Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
CASE REPORT
Rehabilitation program in a patient
with intertrochanteric femoral
fracture
1. Personal data
2. Clinical data
3. Imagistic data
4. Functional data
5. Complete diagnosis
6. Rehabilitation program
1. Personal data
2. Clinical data
3. Imagistic data
4. Functional data
5. Complete diagnosis
6. Rehabilitation program
Personal data
Patient Complaints
Moderate pain and stiffness in left hip, moderate disability in gait
Post surgical (internal fixation of the left intertrochanteric femoral fracture) rehabilitation status
ANAMNESIS (history)
Our 56 year old woman suffered, nine weeks ago, a left intertrochanteric femoral fracture after falling from a height
in her house - falling to the floor, and has underwent surgical treatment.
She had no previous history of postmenopausal osteoporosis (dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry DXA, 3 months ago,
showed a T score of -1.1), lumbar spondylosis and bilateral secondary knee arthrosis (meniscus tears and artroscopy
exploration in both knees, 5 years ago).
Her history reveals pain and disfunctional episods of her knee osteoarthritis disorder. After injury, RA was unable to
stand up and bear weight on her own and needed to lie down for relief. She didn`t reclaim other trauma, vertigo or
loss of consciousness.
She was transported to emergency department immediately, with her left leg in external rotation. After orthopedic
examination, she was diagnosed with left intertrochanteric femoral fracture. The surgical treatment was performed in
the same day for fracture - open reduction and internal fixation with implanted device intramedullary nail / rods -
in femoral shaft and screws in femoral head. Sutures are removed at 15 days. Post operative period was uneventful.
The patient was allowed to bear weight with the help of crutches only after 2 months.
RA is coming in our department to perform and to learn the rehabilitation measures for regaining her gait and her
independence in daily living.
Personal data
Questions (for assessment detailed answers see next page)
1. What is the anatomic fracture type of the intertrochanteric femoral fracture in our patient and how can it
condition the rehabilitation plan?
a. Intracapsular
b. Extracapsular
c. It is no important
R=b
2. Can we identify the contributing factors that determine particular fall in our patient?
a. Yes
b. No
c. Probably
R=a
1. What is the anatomic fracture type of the intertrochanteric femoral fracture in our patient and how can it
condition the rehabilitation plan?
According to what part of the femoral bone is involved, fractures are categorized into three groups: 45% the femoral
neck fractures (intracapsular), 45% fractures around the intertrochanteric crest (extracapsular), a bone segment that
links the greater and lesser trochanters, two bony eminences situated essentially between the femoral neck and the
upper part of the main shaft of the femur, to which the major skeletal muscles are attached (significant consequence
on the rehabilitation program) and 10% subtrochanteric fractures (extracapsular) that involve the femoral shaft itself,
below the lesser trochanter.
2. Can we identify contributing factors that determine particular fall in our patient?
Yes. Our patient is fallen on her left side, landed on hip. Because she made some house activity in height, her
protective reflexes hade to be inadequate to limit the energy of fall. RA has a normal weight, she has not a sufficient
muscle and fat structures around a hip.
Pulmonary, cardiac, digestive and urogenital systems are normal in clinical exam. Mental status is clear.
Vertebral spine lumbar hyperlordosis, back pain.
Upper limb joints ROM and muscle strength with normal values in accordance with her age.
Lower limb ROM of right hip, both knee and ankle joints in normal functional limits, muscle strength of right lower
limb with normal values in accordance with her age.
Left hip joint - minimal pain with any movement of the left leg and minimal groin tenderness on palpation. The skin is
normal, with scar after surgical intervention in the lateral side of the groin. RA had limited ROM to 0-80 degrees
of flexion, 15 degrees of abduction, internal rotation less than 10 degrees, and external rotation less than 15
degrees. Weakness of the hip muscles was noted (the dynamic stabilizers of the pelvis, including hip flexors,
extensors, and abductors had -4, +3 and -4 at MMT, respectively) and the ability to stand and balance on left lower
limb is diminished. A passive straight-leg raise was possible but with pain, like rectus femoris stretch test.
Gait is possible with one crutch, on the right side (partial weightbearing gait on the left lower extremity).
Neurovascular status of lower limbs are intact. Her peripheral pulses are palpable, and she has normal distal sensation
in the both lower extremities.
Vital Signs: temperature 36.5C, blood pressure 130/70 mmHg, rhythmic pulse 72 b/min, 14 respirations / min.
Her medications include oral calcium and vitamin D supplements, paracetamol with tramadolum combination for pain,
chondroprotective agents.
Clinical data
Questions (for assessment detailed answers see next page)
4. Why is it important to perform MMT (manual muscle testing) for all muscles of lower limb?
a. For gait are important both extension and flexion kinetic chains of lower limb
b. For control the hip pain
c. For chose the AINS medication
R=a
Clinical data
Questions` answers
4. What is important to perform MMT (manual muscle testing) for all muscles of lower limb?
All rehabilitation program for gait in patient with hip fracture take into consideration the global kinetic exercises,
after analytic kinetic program. The kinetic muscle chains of the lower limb for extension and for flexion are
very important for independence ambulation, so previous kinetic program must do the MMT.
1. Personal data
2. Clinical data
3. Imagistic data
4. Functional data
5. Complete diagnosis
6. Rehabilitation program
Imagistic data
X-rays.
This type of scan is the most common and widely available diagnostic imaging technique.
The diagnosis of a hip fracture is generally made by an X-ray of the hip and femur.
Necessary radiographs of the hip include an anteroposterior (AP) view of the pelvis and the involved hip and either a
cross-table lateral view or a frog lateral view of the hip. The pelvis radiograph is useful for preoperative planning,
particularly to determine the neck shaft angles for placement of cephalomedullary nails. A traction AP radiograph is
helpful for further delineating the fracture pattern if significant displacement has occurred.
2. The imagistic findings of X-ray scan can suggest the type of fracture (stable / unstable) in our patient?
a. No
b. Yes
c. It is a MRI image of hip
R=b
2. The imagistic findings of X-ray scan can suggest the type fracture (stable / unstable) in our patient?
Cephalomedullary fixation may help with reduction of unstable fractures and prevent excessive shortening from
collapse, in that the nail acts as a calcar rand lateral wall replacement to support the femoral neck. Probably, it was a
"reverse obliquity fracture". In this particulary fractures, the fracture line courses laterally as it extends from proximal
to distal, running perpendicular to the intertrochanteric line. Even if there is no comminution and even if the fracture
line does not reach the subtrochanteric region, this fracture is unstable and prone to displacement with conventional
sliding screws, as the fracture line is parallel to the course of the sliding screw and displaces as the screw slides.
We used:
easily reproducible physical performance measures for activity limitation and participation restriction
VAS = 7 before, 3 after rehabilitation program;
6 Minute Walk, with crutches = 160 meters before; 250 meters after rehabilitation program;
Timed Up and Go, with crutches = 35 seconds before; 20 seconds after rehabilitation program;
scales for condition-specific health status measures
The EQ-5D index - health status part (EQ-5D-3L) of the Euroqol - is based on five dimensions of health-related
quality of life; mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression. Each item has three levels
of severity; no problems, some problems, or major problems. Changes in severity level in each of the five dimensions
of the EQ-5D were 30%, 25%, 12%, 15%, 20%, respectively.
SF-36 (the lower the score the more disability - a score of zero is equivalent to maximum disability; the higher the
score the less disability a score of 100 is equivalent to no disability) = 37 before rehabilitation; 50 after
rehabilitation program.
Functional data
Questions (for assessment detailed answers see next page)
2. The changes in body structures that appeared from surgery may explain?
a. Back pain and lumbar stifness
b. A further disturbance in the neuromuscular status
c. Optimal balance and gait
R=b
3. The final score of the two scales used for our patient The EQ-5D index and SF-36 are in concordance for
disability status ?
a. No
b. It is no possibility to compare the two score scales
c. Yes
R=c
4. How can we explain the values of the two tests used in functional assessment - 6 MWD and Timed Up and Go?
a. There are no explanations
b. The functional status is not improved after intervention
c. The rehabilitation program for muscular joint status takes a few weeks after intervention
R=c
Functional data
Questions` answers
2. The changes in body structures that appeared from surgery may explain?
Additionally, the changes in body structures that appeared from surgery may explain the picture of a further disturbance
in the neuromuscular status. Muscle attachments must be kept in mind in this type of fracture. The abductors and short external rotators
attach to the greater trochanter; the iliopsoas to the lesser. The adductors attach to the shaft below the intertrochanteric region.
3. The final score of the two scales used for our patient The EQ-5D index and SF-36 are in concordance for disability status ?
Yes. The both scales contain the items for quality if life and various daily activities in which the lower limb, hip especially, is
responsible for balance and gait. The gait scheme is disturbed in intertrochanteric femoral fracture. A hip fracture has a dramatic impact
on the patients HRQoL, also for patients with no health-related problems preoperatively. Also, the fracture typically takes 36 months to
heal, the deterioration in HRQoL sustained also twelve months after the fracture.
4. How can we explain the values of the two tests used in functional assessment - 6 MWD and Timed Up and Go?
Complete recovering from intertrochanteric femoral fracture reclaim 2 3 months for plateau in strength and functional gains. The
outcome measures chosen for our patient study are common clinical measures and their associated impairments are theoretically
addressable by targeted rehabilitation techniques, like medical literature data.
1. Personal data
2. Clinical data
3. Imagistic data
4. Functional data
5. Complete diagnosis
6. Rehabilitation program
Complete diagnosis
1. Left intertrochanteric femoral fracture (operated 2 months ago, open reduction and internal fixation
surgery).
2. Mechanical low back pain. Lumbosacral spondylosis.
3. Secondary knee osteoarthritis (bilateral meniscus tears, five years ago).
Complete diagnosis
Questions (for assessment detailed answers see next page)
1. What are the important anatomical aspects for the complete diagnosis and prognosis in our patient ?
a. The vessels around the base of the femoral neck
b. Nerve structure
c. Muscle attachements
R=c
3. Should we mention a complete diagnosis for all patients disorders (knee osteoarthritis for example)? Why?
a. No, it is not an important aspect
b. Yes, because the disorders have an important conditioning for rehabilitation program goals and methods
c. Yes, but not important for rehabilitation program
R=b
Complete diagnosis
Questions` answers
1. What are the important anatomical aspects for the complete diagnosis and prognosis in our patient ?
Intertrochanteric femoral fracture occurs further down the bone and tends to have better blood supply to the fracture
pieces. Cephalomedullary fixation is a percutaneous technique that has the potential for less blood loss, earlier full
weight-bearing, and better reductions. However, it is technically demanding and after the appropriate fixation device
has been placed, the muscles, fascia, and skin are closed.
3. Should we mention a complete diagnosis for all patients disorders (knee osteoarthritis for example)? Why?
The practice of ambulating patients as soon as possible after surgery, in rehabilitation program, has significantly
lowered the incidence of thrombophlebitis and consequent pulmonary embolism. Early mobilization probably
remains the single most effective method for reducing the incidence of these complications. But in gait scheme is
important to be functional and without pain all joints of lower limb and all muscles have to be optimal. Loss of
motion of the lower-extremity joints and muscle hypoatrophy (as described in knee osteoarthritis) are two major
dysfunction parameters.
1. Personal data
2. Clinical data
3. Imagistic data
4. Functional data
5. Complete diagnosis
6. Rehabilitation program
Rehabilitation program (RP)
1. The rehabilitation program (RP) in our patient is similar with other or depends on some factors?
a. Is similar with other rehabilitation program
b. It is not dependent on several factors
c. It is dependent on several factors
R=c
2. Why we should respect the kinetic algorithm program in our patient rehabilitation ?
a. Because ROM exercises must preceded the strength exercise
b. Because it is the patient option
c. Because it is performed open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF)
R=a
3. What are the goals of RP in our patient, when she become in our department ?
a. Initiate functional weightbearing exercises, open kinetic chain AROM and isotonic strengthening exercises
b. Initiate proprioception and gradual gait exercises
c. Restoration of strength, power, and endurance
R = a, b
1. The rehabilitation program (RP) in our patient is similar with other or depends on some factors?
Rehabilitation programs can vary significantly by the type of institution, comprehensiveness of services, intensity of
program, and rehabilitation goals adapted to patient. The optimal setting to provide these rehabilitation services for a
particular patient depends on the number of problems needed to be addressed to achieve full rehabilitation (risk of
fall, gait and lumbar pain); the severity of functional deficits (ICF evaluation); the severity of any comorbid
conditions (osteoporosis and COPD); and access to rehabilitation services (our patient lived in rural location).
2. Why we should respect the kinetic algorithm program in our patient rehabilitation ?
The range of motion, strengthening, and proprioceptive exercises of the involved joint should be initiated and
progressed as indicated and tolerated by the individual. The rehabilitation program is adapted to the surgical
intervention performed for our osteoporotic patient, who has a risk of developing painful non-union status.
3. What are the goals of RP in our patient, when she become in our department ?
The patient is coming in our department after 8 weeks after intervention. The goals of rehabilitation program are:
continuing healing of fracture site, normalizing AROM and impaired proprioception, initiate gradual return to
functional activities and light work activities. All rehabilitation has to respect the progression for optimal control of
patients impairments and functional limitation, to prevent the falls.