Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
Email address:
sbayleyegn130@gmail.com
Received: October 12, 2016; Accepted: October 28, 2016; Published: December 23, 2016
Abstract: In this paper, the solving of a class of both linear and nonlinear Volterra integral equations of the first kind is
investigated. Here, by converting integral equation of the first kind to a linear equation of the second kind and the ordinary
differential equation to integral equation we are going to solve the equation easily. The method of successive approximations
(Neumanns series) is applied to solve linear and nonlinear Volterra integral equation of the second kind. Some examples are
presented to illustrate methods.
Keywords: Volterra Integral Equation, First Kind, Second Kind, Kernel, Method of Successive Approximations
( ) is of the form.
sign [3] & [7].A typical form of an integral equation in and the second kind. By doing this, it helps the researchers to
prepare themselves for more challenging problems that will be
( ) = ( )+ ( , ) ( )
( )
considered in subsequent topics.
( )
(1)
6
It gives clue to extend the concept of integral equation
0 ) ( ) = ( ) ( )345 +& [( ) ( )]
6
to many interdisciplinary areas instead of using
(
differential equations.
It invites other researchers interested on the rest part of
=& ( ) .
integral equations.
(
3. Research Methods
Since, again by [Leibniz rule], : 7(8) ;8 and hence , are
9 <=
<>
continuous functions of > on [:, ?], we may now apply the
In this research, we had used successive approximation
method of integral equations in transforming from ordinary
differential equation (ODE). Integral equations of the rst kind fundamental theorem of calculus I to deduce
0( ) ) = 0( ) )
0( ) = 0)( ) = ( )
' '
are often extremely ill-conditioned. Applying the kernel to a
( ( (
function is generally a smoothing operation, so the solution, (2)
)) ( ), CEF ) ,
A( , =B
0, CEF ) .
nonlinear) are generally suspected of being ill-conditioned or ill- (3)
f(x) or K(x, t) may have a large effect in the numerical solution The function G = G(t, x ) is continuous, except on the line
posed. In such circumstances small changes in
of f(x) of the problem. If the original problem had a solution the given by t = x , and hence integrable. Using Fubinis
perturbed equation may have no solution, and vice-versa. Theorem
'
))
The theories of ordinary and partial differential equations are = (
L (
A( , )
M = (
L 4
( ) )
M =
( ) ( )
a fruitful source of integral equations. The researcher shall '
(
sketch here one of the ways in which integral equations can arise (4)
from ordinary differential equations. Most ordinary differential
Hence proved.
equations can be expressed as integral equations, but the reverse
Now considering the first-order differential equation.
= P ) = ( , P)
is not true [10] & [11].
NO
N
To investigate the relationship between integral and (5)
single one.
[ , !] IR is continuous. Then
Lemma 1: (Replacement Lemma) suppose that obtaining
P
&S T = & ( , P) & P
'
&& ( ) )
= &( ) ( ) , [ , !] R R R
( ( (
= & L , P( )M P( ) P(0)
Proof:Dene F [a, b] IR by
R
0( ) = &( ) ( ) , [ , !] = & L , P( )M
R
(
P( ) = PR L , P( )M , CEUEP(0) = PR
12
R
and t in [a, b], we can use [Leibniz rule] to differentiate F: (6)
V2W
213 Teshome Bayleyegn Matebie: The Method of Successive Approximations (Neumanns Series) of Volterra Integral
Equation of the Second Kind
y(0) = yR , y ) = yY
f d
(7)
P
The argument is reversible, so that here again the
& S T =& ( )
differential equation (7), together with the initial conditions,
R R
is equivalent to the single integral equation (9). We see also
that any solution of (7) satisfies an integral equation of the
P ) ( ) P ) (0) = & ( )
form.
P( ) = ` + a + ( )^ L , P( )M_
4
R
(10) R
d = P(0) = `f = P(e)
R R
h
= ` + ae + & (e ) [L , P( )M]
Whence the second integration
4
P
R
& = & & ([) [
` = d, a = R (e ) [ , P( )]
i h Y
R R R
h h
(11)
Hence, the function y(x) must therefore satisfy the integral = & ( ) & [ = &( ) ( )
R 4 R
equation
Pure and Applied Mathematics Journal 2016; 5(6): 211-219 214
s( ) ( ) = 0( ) + ( , ) ( )
5. Integral Equation
( )
(15)
Definition: Any equation in which the unknown function f(x)
Volterra integral equation of the first kind. Ifg(x) = 0,
appears under the integral sign and integrals of that function to
0 = 0( ) + ( , ) ( )
s( ) ( ) = 0( ) + ( , ) ( )
( ) ( )
(16)
( )
(14)
( ) = 0( ) + ( , ) ( )
classification of integral equations.
( )
An integral equation can be classified as a linear or nonlinear (18)
integral equation as we know in the ordinary and partial
differential equations [4], [6] & [7]. In the previous section, This equation is called Volterra integral equations of
These have noticed that the differential equation can be second kind
( ) = 0( ) + ( , ) ( )
there is a good relationship between these two equations. The
( )
most frequently used integral equations fall under two major
(19)
classes, namely Volterra and Fredholm integral equations. Of
course, These have to classify them as homogeneous or non This equation is called non homogeneous Volterra integral
homogeneous; and also linear or nonlinear. In some practical equations of second kind For non homogeneous Volterra integral
problems. equations is numerical parameter, whereas for homogeneous
This research is focusing on the Volterra integral equations Volterra integral equations is an eigen value parameter because
and its solution by the method of successive approximations in such a case the integral equation presents an eigen value
(Neumanns series) The classification of integral equations problem in which the objective is to determine those values of ,
centers on three basic characteristics which together describe called the eigenvalues for which the integral equation possesses
their overall structure and it is useful to set these down briefly nontrivial solutions called eigen functions.
before entering into greater detail.
I The kind of an equation refers to the location of the 6.1. Kernel of an Integral Equation
unknown function.
First kindequations have the unknown function present When considering numerical methods for integral
under the integral sign only. equations, particular attention should be paid to the character
Secondkind equations also have the unknown function of the kernel, which is usually the main factor governing the
outside the integral. choice of an appropriate quadrature formula or system of
II The historical descriptions Fredholm and Volterra are approximating functions. Various commonly occurring types
concerned with the integration.interval. In a Fredholm of singularity call for individual treatment.
equation the integral is over a finite interval with fixed Likewise provision can be made for cases of symmetry,
endpoints. In a Volterra equation the integral is periodicity or other special structure, where the solution
indefinite. may have special properties and/or economies may be
III The adjective singular is sometimes used when the affected in the solution process. We note in particular the
integration is improper, either. because the interval is following cases to which we shall often have occasion to
infinite, or because the integrand is unbounded within refer in the description of individual algorithms. The
the. given interval. Obviously an integral equation can presence of the kernel under the operator makes the
215 Teshome Bayleyegn Matebie: The Method of Successive Approximations (Neumanns Series) of Volterra Integral
Equation of the Second Kind
)(
6
)=& (k( , )[( )) + ( , )[( ) )
behavior of these equations less transparent than
6
differential equations. Consider the apparently benign
R
(0, )[( )(0))
kernel clearly the form of the kernel is crucial to nature of
( , )[( ) + ( , ) [( ) = )( )
If the equations of the kernel has the form K(x, t) = R
equation, the kernel is called centro-symmetric (22)
Y @
The second way to obtain the second kind Volterra integral
Where the functions and are well behaved.
equation from the rst kind is by using integration by parts, if
6.2. The Conversion First Kind Integral Equations to the we set.
[( ) = ( )
Second Kind Integral Equations
R
(24)
Thus it would appear that Volterra integral equations of
the second kind are more well behaved that Volterra Or equivalently
[() = ( )
integral equation of the rst kind [7]. To the extent that 4
R
this is true, we may replace any Volterra integral equation (25)
of the rst kind with Volterra integral equations of the
Then by using integration by parts,
second kind. The relation between Volterra integral
4 4
( ) = R
k( , ) [( ) (20) which reduces to
= ( ), = ( , ) F =
N{ N| N|
N N N4
[ ( , )( )]45R & 4( , ) ( ) = ( )
4 ( , ) exists and are continuous, then the equation can be
if the derivatives
The first and the simplest way are to differentiate both And finally we get
( , )( ) ( , 0)(0) 4( , ) ( ) = ( )
sides of equation (11) with respect to x and we obtain
R
by using the Leibnitz rule. (26)
Leibniz General Rule
If It is obvious that (0) = 0, and dividing out by K(x, x) we
}(2) }(2)
have
d ( ) =
{' ( )
+
| ( ,4)
( ) 0( ) A( , ) ( )
I(x) = & f(x, t)dt, then I ) (x) = [ & f(x, t)dt]
dx
|( , ) R |( , ) (
(27)
~(2) ~(2)
}(2)
where
= + ([( ), )[) ( ) (( ), ) ) ( ),
( ) {( ,4)
For this second process it is apparently not necessary for
( )
= (k( , )[( ))
f(x) to be differentiable However, the function u(x) must
N({( )
R
finally be calculated by differentiating the function (x)
N given by the formula.
( ) = + ( , ; 1)
{'( ) { '(4)
|( , ) R |(4,4)
(28)
Pure and Applied Mathematics Journal 2016; 5(6): 211-219 216
Where H(x, t 1 is the resolvent kernel corresponding forfR x are 0, 1, and x. Thus, at the limit, the solution f x of
| ,4
. To do this f x must be differentiable the equation (29) is obtained as
| ,
to
eg (34)
6.3. Solution of Volterra Integral Equation
so that the resulting solution f x is independent of the choice
In the previous sections, we have clearly dened the of the zeroth approximation fR x . This process of
integral equations with some useful illustrations. This section approximation is extremely simple. However, if we follow
deals with the Volterra integral equations and their solution the Picards successive approximation method, it needs to set
techniques. The approach of Volterra equations in much the fR x = x , and determine fY x and other successive
same way as it has been done Fredholm equations, but there approximation as follows:
is the problem that the upper limit of the integral is the
independent variable of the equation. For thus choose a Y R
, R @
quadrature scheme that utilizes the endpoints of the interval; R
, Y iY
,
otherwise we will not be able to evaluate the functional
( i@
,
equation at the relevant quadrature points. One could adopt
the view that Volterra equations are, in general, just special R iY (35)
cases of Fredholm integral equation equations.
The last equation is the recurrence relation. Consider
, 4
R
* , , " *
(29)
@ Y R
R
Where K x, t is the kernel of the integral equation, x a , @
,
4
,
R R R
continuous function of x, and a parameter. Here, x and
@ s@
K x, t are the given functions but f x is an unknown
(36)
,
Thus, it can be easily observed from equation (36) that
R
5R s
(30)
(38)
Y R
, R (31)
@ R
, Y (32)
R
, iY (33)
Figure 1. Double integration over the triangular region (shaded area).
for n 1, 2, 3, . .. and fR x is equivalent to any selected real- Integration, we obtain.
valued function. The most commonly selected function
217 Teshome Bayleyegn Matebie: The Method of Successive Approximations (Neumanns Series) of Volterra Integral
Equation of the Second Kind
+ &E i4
\ ( ) + & E 4i () ]
general.
s ( ) = R ( , ) () , = 1, 2, 3, (40) R R
( , ) ( , ), @ ( , ), ( , ), .
Where the iterative kernels
Y 4
= ( ) +&E ( ) + &&E ()
are dened by the
recurrence formula i4 @ i
Y ( , )= @( , ) (, ) R R R
4
(41)
= ( )+ { 5Y ( , ) } ()
In the double integration the order of integration is
will be given be as n
Hence it is also plausible that the solution of equation (29)
( ) = ( ) + &E ( ) + @ &( )E ( )
i4 i4
R R
lim f (x) = f(x) = ( ) + & { ( , ) } () ( )@
+ & E i4
( )
R 5Y
2!
R
= ( )+ R
( , ; ) L ( ) + R
E i4 ( ) M
Thus, continuing in this manner, we obtain as n
(44)
( ) = eg ( )
Where
( , ; ) = 5Y ( , )
= ( )
(45)
+ & E L1 + ( ) + @ ( )@
is known as the resolvent kernel.
Example 1 i4
R
Solve the following Volterra integral equation of the
+ M ( )
second kind of the convolution type using successive
approximation method.
( ) = ( )+ E i4 ( )
= ( ) + &E ( ) ( )
R
E
i4 ( i4)
(46)
R
Solution:
R( )=0 R
(47)
Y( )= ( ) (48)
Here, the resolvent kernel is
( , ; ) = E (Y)( i4)
Using this information in equation (46), the second
approximation is given by.
@( ) = ( ) + &E Y( )
i4
Another method to determine the solution by the
resolvent kernel
R The procedure to determine the resolvent kernel is the
@( )= ( )+ E ( )
i4 following: Given that
R
( ) = ( ) + &E ( )
(49)
i4
R
Proceeding in this manner, the third approximation can be
obtained as
Pure and Applied Mathematics Journal 2016; 5(6): 211-219 218
where the resolvent kernel is given by Where x and x are constants and the equations are
called non linear Fredholm integral equations.
, ; = Y ,
2
5R
f x = F x +& K x, t GLf t Mdt orf x
- 2
In which 2
= F x + & GLx, t, f t Mdt
- 2
Y , = + & , , , F = 1,2,3
4
Where x is constant and xis independent variable the
It is to be noted thatK x, t = K x, t Thus, we obtain equations are called non linear Volterra integral equations.
2 2 The function G f t is non-linear except G =a constant or
K @ x, t = & e 2i
e 2i
d = e 2i
& d = x t e2i G f x = f x in which case G is linear. GLf x M =
f x , forn 2, then function G is non linear.
Example 1
Similarly, proceeding in this manner, we obtain 2
2 f x = x + & x t f @ t dt
xt @
R
K x, t = & e2i e 2i t d = e2i
2!
and
xt 2
K x, t = e2i =
3! x = 1 + & K x, t lnLf t M dt
xt R
K Y x, t = e2i
n!
Are non linear volterra integral equations. By contrast,
Hence the resolvent kernel is solving nonlinear Volterra equations usually involves only a
slight modication of the algorithm for linear equations.
xt
H x, ; = K Y x, t = e2i H x, t;
The Picards method to obtain successive algebraic
n! approximations. By putting numbers in these, we generally
5R 5R
= e Y 2i get excellent numerical results. Unfortunately, the method
can only be applied to a limited class of equations, in which
the successive integrations be easily performed. We shall
Once the resolvent kernel is known therefore succeeded in
treat everal examples by these methods to enable their merits
inverting the integral equation because the right- hand side of
to be compared.
the above formula is a known quantity.
Consider the initial value problem given by the rst-order
6.3.2. The Method of Successive Approximations for nonlinear differential equation.
Non-Linear Integral Equations df/dx = x, f x with the initial condition f a =
Nonlinear integral equations yield a considerable amount batx = a.This initial value problem can be transformed to the
of difficulties. However, due to recent development of novel nonlinear integral equation and is written as
techniques it is now possible to nd solutions of some types
of nonlinear integral equations if not all. In general, the =!+& ,
solution of the nonlinear integral equation is not unique.
(
However, the existence of a unique solution of nonlinear
integral equations with specic conditions is possible. For a rst approximation, we replace
We rst dene a nonlinear integral equation in general, and the f x in Lx, f x Mbyb , for a second approximation, we
then cite some particular types of nonlinear integral replace it by the rst approximation, for the third by the
equations. In general, a nonlinear integral equation is dened second, and so on.
as given in the following equation:
R =! Y =!+& ,!
(
219 Teshome Bayleyegn Matebie: The Method of Successive Approximations (Neumanns Series) of Volterra Integral
Equation of the Second Kind
, !)
7. Conclusion
@ ! & ! &
( (
In thispaper we proposed some of the numerical methods
to solve volterra (linear and non linear) integral equations.
-(2)
( ) = &L + @( )M
R
To solve this for f(x) the choice of the initial data f0(x),
plays an essential role on the speed of the convergence of the
Solution numerical methods, successive approximation method.
The given differential equation can be written in integral Numerical methods have been selected based on the ability to
equation form as obtain rapid convergence, based on existence of reliable and
( ) = &( +
cheaply computable error estimates and personal predilection
@
( ))
When the kernel is simple enough to be closely
R
approximated by a degenerate kernel with a few functions,
1
A solution of the integral equation gives more accurate
( )=& =
2
results than a solution of the differential equation using the
same step size and degree of precision in the integration
R procedure.
( )= + ( ) ,
W
@
@
Second approximation:put in
yielding References
@ @
( ) = & + = +
2 2 20
[1] W. V. Lovitt. (1950). Linear Integral Equations, Dover
Represented.
R
2 20 4 20 400
R R
[4] Peter Linz. (1985). Analytical and Numerical Methods for
x@
x x x YY
= + + +
Volterra Equations.
Proceeding in this manner, Fourth approximation can be [6] F. Smithies (1958). Cambridge Tracts in Mathematics and
written after a rigorous algebraic manipulation as Mathematical Physics.
Fourth approximation [7] Peter J. Collins. (2006). Differential and Integral equations,
x@
x x
7x 3x
x YY Y @R
f(x) = + + + + +
WIT Press.
+ ,
Methods in Science and Mathematics.