Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
Abstract
Lessons learnt from past devastating earthquakes repeatedly emphasize on importance of school buildings. In our country
performance of school structures are worst in past earthquakes and increase vulnerability of school buildings for damage had
multiplied the intensity of impact on society after earthquake occurrence. Collapse of school buildings causes loss of lives of most
sensitive part of society i.e. children. The loss to children has huge impact on the community. The school also serve as shelter to
homeless during the earthquake. Role of schools in pre and post scenario of earthquake event demand Immediate Occupancy level
performance. A large number of school buildings are not earthquake resistant. It is economically not feasible to demolish and build
again all these important buildings with earthquake resistant features. Structural engineers have developed a number of retrofitting
techniques which can be used to upgrade the performance level of existing structure. In this paper as a case study a school building
which has suffered damage in 18th September 2011 earthquake, has been evaluated and retrofitting measures have been suggested to
upgrade performance level of the building to make it safer against future earthquakes.
Keywords: School building; Damage; Earthquake; Immediate Occupancy; Fibre Reinforced Polymer: Retrofitting
----------------------------------------------------------------------***--------------------------------------------------------------------
__________________________________________________________________________________________
Volume: 03 Issue: 06 | Jun-2014, Available @ http://www.ijret.org 496
IJRET: International Journal of Research in Engineering and Technology eISSN: 2319-1163 | pISSN: 2321-7308
3.3 Loading and Load Combinations 2000 through nonlinear analysis for Design Basis Earthquake
(DBE) and Maximum Considered Earthquake (MCE). Using
The weight of floor slabs, corridor slabs, staircase slabs, roof the guidelines of FEMA-356 [6], nonlinear plastic hinges are
truss members, columns, beams, external wall, and partition assigned to beams and columns. The flexural hinges (M3) are
walls have been considered for dead weight calculation. The assigned for the beams at two ends. The interacting P-M2-M3
dead weight of Watertank has been taken for full capacity frame hinges are assigned to all columns at lower and upper
storage i.e. 400gals. Dead loads of slabs are distributed to ends. Expected yield strength of concrete and steel are used
surrounding beam in trapezoidal and triangular loading for nonlinear analysis [3].
according to yield line pattern [9]. The dead weight of
masonry walls are uniformly distributed to beams. The walls
3.6 Analysis of Results
are constructed with brick masonry having unit weight of
20kN/m3. Density of concrete is taken as 25kN/m3. Live load Pushover analysis is performed using software along X and Y
on buildings have been taken as per IS: 875(Part 2)- directions and pushover curves are plotted (Figs 5and 6). Base
1987[11].Earthquake loads are calculated as per IS: 1893- shear and roof displacement at performance point is found out
1975[12]. Gangtok falls under zone IV, therefore Zone factor using ATC-40[3] (Table 2). The status of performance has
(Z) is considered as 0.24 [13]. Value of Importance Factor (I) also been evaluated in terms of number of hinges for DBE and
is taken as 1.5 and Response Reduction factor (R) is MCE level of earthquakes (Table 3). Existing component
considered as 3 since ductile detailing have not been done in response has been evaluated by hinge performance point
the building block design. The earthquake loads have been defined by ATC-40[3] (Fig 7) in which B, C, D, and E
applied in the form of response spectrum. Response spectrum represent effective yield point, yielding with strain hardening,
is taken for medium soil and seismic Zone IV [13]. All strength degradation and final collapse respectively. Between
possible load combinations specified by IS 1893:2002 [13] points B and C three more points Immediate Occupancy (IO),
have been considered to evaluate the safety of the building. Life Safety (LS) and Collapse Prevention (CP) are introduced
to define acceptance hinge criteria [2]. To have IO level
3.4 Modal Analysis performance no hinges should be in the range of IO-LS. But in
the analysis for school building some hinges are located in IO-
To study dynamic response of building modal analysis has LS category under MCE level demand. IO-LS level hinges
been carried out using software. Time periods are evaluated have appeared at the same location where damages have been
for first three fundamental vibration modes of the building observed after the Sikkim earthquake of September 2011.
(Table 1). Location of formation of these hinges has been found in
columns of bathroom areas and corridors mostly (Fig 3).
Table 1: Time Periods (in sec) for first three modes of Hinges have appeared in column before formation of hinges in
vibration beam which shows reinforced concrete frame designed as
Weak column-Strong beam design concept. For ductility in the
Mode No. Time Period (Sec) Vibration Mode structure design should be based on Strong column-Weak
1 0.769 Longitudinal beam concept.
2 0.584 Torsional
3 0.558 Transverse
2500
2000 .054,2117
Base Force(kN)
.030,1756
1500
1000
-PP for DBE
500
- PP for MCE
0
0 0.02 0.04 0.06 0.08 0.1
Roof Displacement(m) Fig 7: Different stages of plastic hinge
Steel/ RC Jacketing: Jacketing of column is one of the member regions based on the deficiency of lateral load resisting
level retrofit techniques. It improves the axial and shear capacity [7]. Vc, VN and Vs contributes to seismic strength of
strength of column in uniform and distributed way [1]. To unstrengthened column where Vc is shear strength due to
improve lateral load capacity of building, jacketing of weak concrete depending on ductility, VN and Vs represents shear
columns are generally carried out in form of reinforced strength contribution due to axial load and transverse steel
concrete jackets or steel jackets [1]. respectively [7]. Vo/ v is the actual shear demand of column
where Vo is shear demand based on full flexural overstrength
FRP (Fibre Reinforced Polymer) overlay on columns: in plastic hinges, and v is strength reduction factor
Winding of high strength carbon/glass fibre around column respectively. Difference of shear demand and capacity can be
surface at the location of formation of hinges enhances lateral provided by shear capacity of FRP jackets. Shear strength Vfrp
load resisting capacity of column [1]. FRP is widely used for and thickness tfrp of frp jacket is given by [7],
retrofitting due to its properties of high degree of confinement,
lightweight, and flexibility in application. Vfrp=2 Eqn (1)
__________________________________________________________________________________________
Volume: 03 Issue: 06 | Jun-2014, Available @ http://www.ijret.org 499
IJRET: International Journal of Research in Engineering and Technology eISSN: 2319-1163 | pISSN: 2321-7308