Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
high percentage of the global job market. In the contemporary world, workplace bias has been
associated with negative connotations such as stereotype, prejudice, and discrimination thereby
portraying it as a bad thing. However, Thiederman (2003) asserts that this is no surprise since
bias refers to the tendency of a party to incline to give an unprejudiced of another party or an
underlying issue. Therefore, it is important to note that bias in the workplace may be positive or
negative because they are often personal. As such, they emanate from the involvement of two or
The modern workplace is filled with numerous types of biases. However, the areas where
biases are most common are universal throughout the world. For instance, biases are usually
common in the hiring, promotion, and remuneration process of a company (Bielby, 2000). In all
this cases, the responsible company personnel to deal with the activity prefer one party over the
other based on attitudes rather than on qualifications and performance. Resultantly, the
perpetrators of such vices should note that they are creating a disharmonious workforce.
Additionally, they are decreasing the morale of the employees because most workers are bound
to lose the motivation to perform better since the paths to a promotion and better pay are
blocked. Consequently, such actions reduce the productivity and reputation of the entire firm.
Nonetheless, there are various steps or strategies that companies can employ to reduce or
eliminate cases of biases in their operations. Firstly, Thiederman (2003) posits that organizations
must encourage their human personnel to discuss all cases of biases that occurs within their
boundaries because the realization of self-awareness denotes the primary step. Workers must
admit and own to possessing them before they can attempt to address such actions. Subsequently,
the employees and staff must understand and realize the effects that biases may cause in the
decision-making process as well as other activities within their firms. Additionally, the
employers or management must survey the employee body regarding their experiences with
either the conscious and unconscious biases or any hidden obstacles within the institution.
The interventions preferred for implementation must be tailored based on the results of
the survey. Afterward, it is essential to implement practices and policies that ensure that the
recognized biases do not impede on the path towards a harmonious workplace. Then, the
structured recruitment processes by employees social networks. The hiring of the companys
personnel must not use sites for assessing the applicants. Ultimately, both federal and private
proprietors may opt to leverage affirmative action compliance as a measure of monitoring the
decisions of top-ranking managers. Such a decision aims at ensuring that all forms of systematic
One the companies that have taken steps towards address bias in their corporate
operations is the Coca-Cola Company (Thiederman, 2003). In this case, Coca-Cola Company
undertook a series of internal surveys that have made it survive the 2000 challenge of diversity.
As a result, the company learned numerous valuable lessons regarding about biases and its
impact on the workplace. Coca-Cola now provides a better job environment compared to before
the study and the subsequent process of reducing biases. Hence, it innocuous to claim that other
firms may learn from Coca Colas experience or undergo comparable mayhem. Nonetheless,
companies operating today are in a better place because they have a choice to make, unlike
Bielby, W. T. (2000). Minimizing Workplace Gender and Racial Bias. Contemporary Sociology,
29(1), 120-129.
Thiederman, S. B. (2003). Making diversity work: 7 steps for defeating bias in the workplace.
Chicago: Dearborn.