Report Fault

Consulting Supervision for Construction of
Karian Multipurpose Dam Project Review Design by Geologist / Grouting Engineer
Dam Site Fault Zone survey report
Table of contents
1. Review of existing report

A. Outline
B. Matters that need to be examined in the
existing report
2. Field geological survey of Karian dam fault zone

A. Geology
B. Fault and active fault
C. The Drilling survey direction and countermeasures
3. Drilling
4. Conclusion
5. Drill log
6. Reference photo
Korea Rural Community Corporation

1
in Consortium with Korea Engineering Consultant Corp,
PT. Indra Karya, PT. Wiratman, PT. Mettana
1. Review of existing report
The opinion about the fault zone is referred to the survey report Multipurpose Dam
Construction Project (1985) by Japan International Cooperation Agency
A. Outline
Usually, geological survey is narrowed down from wide area survey to point survey. After
reviewing existing reports and data, then wide area survey is conducted and through satellite or
aerial photograph general geological condition of the site is comprehended.
As a following step, field geological survey is carried out and with simple tools such as a
geologic hammer and compass, physical eyes we can check general geological condition. The
next step is geophysical prospection, which can correspond to X-ray or CT scan in hospital and
generally elastic wave exploration and electricity resistivity exploration are followed.
For the last step, boring, a concept of point survey will be conducted. This is the final review
of all pre-conducted surveys to confirm all the conclusions of the survey process, which can be
compared to endoscopy in hospital.
The geological survey conducted in 1985 is considered that they would have followed above
steps because these steps are general geological survey steps. According to the above report, the
Karian dam site has clear 3 fault lines along the riverbed and a fault toward NE-SW is
developing through Ciberang river. Also later in the process of project, examining and planning a
measure for the fault zone will be consistently paid attention by officials.
Therefore, after reviewing geological survey, field geological survey was conducted at the
expected location for Karian dam. The followings are our opinions.
B. Matters that need to be examined in the existing report

- According to the survey report 3-4 of the Karian Multipurpose Dam Construction project (1985.
Volume 1,: main report) by Japan International Cooperation Agency, it says that they have found
fault zone from aerial photographs, but according to the recent field survey result, this site has
too dense forest even hard to walk in forest. How is it possible to discover fault zone from aerial
photographs? Why didnt they attach aerial photographs in the report?

2
(photo 1 Satellite Photo by google)
- If the fault zone could be found from aerial photograph, they should have found the evidence
from the field geological survey but they did not mention about it. According to the recent field
geological survey, the outcrop of the bedrock barely has weathered rock and weathering zone of
tuff and the rock floor was almost the same. Therefore there was no sign of fault.
- Even in the elastic wave exploration conducted afterwards, there was no mention about siding
design to examine fault zone. Also in explaining map there was no sign of clear fault, in the
same way in the boring survey which is conducted afterwards.
- The terms well-defined or confirmed were used in description of fault zone in the report,
meanwhile the term assumed was used in the blueprint(fig c-2, c-36), which makes us to think
that this fault zone is just assumed.
- According to the geology part for Cilawang Dam in the same report, it is described that fault is
not found, but according to the geological map of fig 3-1(f-1), fault zone clearly appears which
is at right angles to the dam.
2. Field geological survey
A. Geology distribution
In this area there are the alluvial of holocene, terrace deposit of pleistocene, tuffaceous
sedimentary rock of pliocene to miocene, and southern volcanos of miocene. They are mainly
composed of fine to coarse tuffaceous sediment and pumice tuff with interbedding of lapilli tuffs,
which belong to the Genteng Formation of pliocene in the inundation area.

3
B. Fault and Active Fault

(1) Fault
If the force acting on stratum is over a certain limitation, the middle stratum will be cut and
displaced. Thus this displaced geology structure is called fault. Oblique slip between two dislocated strata
is called fault plane and the stratum which located on fault plane is called hanging wall, located under
fault plane is called lower half. If stratum receives force that pulls horizontally the stratum will be cut and
hanging wall will fall down through fault plane and this structure is called a normal fault. If stratum
gets force which pushes horizontally, hanging wall will go up through fault plane and we call this a
reverse fault.
Although there are different types of fault but considering the lay of the land, the form of stratification
and directivity, if fault exists in dam site it is highly possible that it is normal fault that the hanging wall
falls along the river.
(2) Active fault

Every nation has their own active fault standard, and some European countries do not stipulate it.
In case of the U.S., they stipulate it 1) if there has been a movement observed within 35,000
years which is close to index or moved from index (more than once) or there has been a
movement occurred again within 500,000 years (more than two times) 2) if there is a written
evidence of seismic activity that could explain the direct relation to fault 3) if there has been a
strong earthquake that caused one displacement to be displaced again. Therefore, to verify fault
in dam site and that this fault is active fault, either measuring the absolute age of fault clay
mineral or having a strong earthquake record is needed.
C. The Drilling survey direction and countermeasures

Although we have these questions, ways to confirm the fault zone described in the same report
are as follows:
- It says fault develops clearly through Ciberang River, it can be assumed that one of the
reasons of creating river and making it deep was fault. Also the boundary surface
between the broken stratum and the remaining stratum could not be evident because
many years have passed. However, broken stratums underground bedrock had been
crushed and softened so it might have been different from remaining stratum, which can
be used for assuming that there were fault activities.
To clarify this, we are going to do 6 borings at each 50m spot from where the rivers left and
right topography slope is rapidly changing, which is assumed to be the boundary between the
fallen stratum and the remaining stratum, and will examine the condition of bed rock and joint
orientation. (See picture2 boring survey planning in Karian dam area)

4
picture 2 Boring survey planning in karian dam area
3. Drilling
The drilling was conducted in surrounding area of the river which is considered to be the
stratum distant from fault, and for BH2,5,6 drilling was carried out on the right and left of dam
site that is considered to be the remained stratum.
BH6 also has the purpose to estimate the ground water level of the tunnel under the condition for
the design certificate.
In around the river, a vertical drill and the opposite direction of inclined drill was planned in
order to cross with the estimated fault plane, and we also placed an emphasis on identifying the
lower part of stratum of the river. (See table 1)
The rock that is distributed in this surveyed area, regardless of its rock type or with or without
fault activity, is found that overall degree of weathering is very severe or it has widely
distributed less lithificated stratum of clastic sedimentary by volcanic activity. Also the survey
showed that the foundation ground was formed with weathered rock or weathered an aluvium
that only has form of rock.
Core recovery of the rock including weathered rock slightly exceeds 10%, except the bottom
15m of BH-1(the lower ground of the river, 45 degree slope drill) and BH-2(bored on the left
side of the Mountain crest), and the core recovery of the rock that has more rock strength than
soft rock is only less than 5%.
It is considered that the core recovery on the drill log as a result of drilling that is written on
1985 and 2006 report, does not only include the rock core but also all the numbers collected

5
from weathered rock that is almost like soil that is drilled not using drilling water.
Comparing the survey result to the original direction, the core recovery of the rock in the lower
stratum of the river that was confirmed by inclined boring was expected to be low, but no clear
difference was found.
(TABLE 1) ANALYSIS T.C.R OF DRILLING CORE
T.C.R (%)
Hole Nu
Division Depth (m) Include Weathere Exception Wea Remark
mber
d Rock thered Rock
River Side BH-1 0 - 13 - - Inclined Drilling
13 - 20 8 2 (left-right)
20 - 25 15 3 450
25 - 30 60 46
30 - 39 65 20
BH-3 0 - 5 - - Inclined Drilling
5 - 35 6 - 9 (right-left)
35 - 40 34 4
BH - 4 0 - 10 4 - Right bank
10 - 15 8 2
15 - 20 5 2
20 - 25 50 30
25 - 35 12 2
35 - 40 20 4
Top of the left
Hill side BH - 2 0 - 15 10 - 16 1 - 2 bank
15 - 20 66 36
20 - 25 90 90
25 - 30 74 50
30 - 35 90 60
BH - 5 0 - 15 3 - Right bank
15 - 20 6 1
20 - 25 8 1
25 - 30 12 2
30 - 35 26 6
35 - 40 20 5
BH - 6 0 - 5 2 - Tunnel, right bank
5 - 10 13 3
10 - 15 22 6
15 - 20 19 3

6
4. Conclusion
A. This survey was conducted to identify the existence of the fault zone that is one of the
technical issues by the conditions for the Design Certificate.
B. In the report Multipurpose Dam Construction Project(1985) by Japan International
Cooperation Agency, it was referred to that fault was developed in parallel to the flow of the
river, therefore, the survey direction was set up supposing that the river area is where the
upper half of normal fault has fallen, thus, fallen stratum might be more crushed and softened
than the remaining stratum.
C. For BH-1 and BH-4 drilling that were drilled around the river, inclined boring was carried out
with an angle of 45 degrees to confirm fault plane if obtained data from the foundation
ground of the bottom of the river and the fault planes slope is the same with the left and right
slope. In addition, we tried to get fault clay mineral which is the feature of fault plane.
D. BH-1, 3, 4 borings were constructed around the river that is supposed to be the fallen stratum
of the fault, and BH-2, 5, 6 borings were constructed on both side of the stratum that is
supposed to be the remained stratum of the fault.
E. The out crops which were found from surface geological survey are all weathered rock or
weathered and sedentary soil of bed rock that only has a form of rock. Thus, even though
there is fault plane, visual identification is nearly impossible because of weathering and
erosion.
F. We tried to find fault plane and the evidence existing in fault plane by inclined boring from
the result of drilling, however, we could not confirm fault plane given that the stratum in deep
underground is an unconsolidated stratum or highly weathered stratum.
G. As a result of core logging, it is considered that the discontinuity in this stratum such as
bedding and joint was only impacted by solidification without any big external force in the
sedimentary environment of the time. No sign of magmatic injection or serious diastrophism
shows low possibility of fault occurrence.
H. The surrounding area of the river was found that in sedimentation stage the soft part of the
upper was cut little by little by streams of river, and sediments of river such as sand and
gravel are deposited in 5-10m thickness and foundation ground above soft rock is distributed
under about 20m vertical depth.
I. Overall, left side of the foundation ground appeared to be somewhat better than the right side,
and on the right side softer foundation ground is distributed than the left side and it gets better
towards the deep part.
J. The stratum that rock core is not formed is unconsolidated stratum which is estimated to be N
value 10-30 by standard penetration test in every boring. hard and soft are distributed by turn
and does not show any particular tendency, therefore, it is considered that this is also caused
by the composition and density of the time of sedimentation.
K. As mentioned in the introduction, the referral of fault zone at the planned dam site is
questionable, and the stratum distributed in this area was found as unconsolidated or severely
weathered stratum, not only with drilling survey but also on the ground surface not an
appropriate condition to find characteristics and evidences in fault as slickenside, fault breccia
and fault gouge. Therefore, since we could not confirm the distribution of a particular
fragmentation of stratum in fallen stratum that is taken into account when planning the
drilling survey or fault plane caused by fault activity, we cannot say there was a fault activity
in dam site.
L. Thus, it is considered that there is no need to take any special measures concerning a fault or
an active fault, it is recommended to install measuring tools such as piezometer and
inclinometer during the construction, monitoring ground displacement in a long-term, and
continuously paying heed to and observing as measures.

7
BORING LOG
PROJECT : CONSTRUCTION OF KARIAN MULTI PURSE DAM PROJECT
LOCATION : Dam Site DATE : 02 - 18 Dec 2013
BORE HOLE NO : BH- 01- I BORING METHOD : Coring Sampling
ELEVATION : 121.00 m INCLINATIOIN : 450
COORDINATE : X = 642007,4269. Y = 9290686,9065 DIAMETER OF HOLE : 73 mm
DEPTH : 48.00 m DRILLER : Herman
WATER LEVEL : 10,00 m LOGGER : Ketut Subekti
AVERAGE CORE RECOVERY : 99.80% REVIEWED BY : Zainal Arifin
ROCK
WATER LEVEL
CORE QUALITY
ROCK CLASS
SAMPLING
COULUM DESIGNATION
GROUND
SOIL/ SOIL/ RECOVERY
DATE
DEPTH (RQD)
(m)
(m)
ROCK ROCK Description Cm %
UNIT TYPE SECTION (%) (%)
0 50 100 0 50 100
00.00 Top Soil Clay v v 0,00 - 0,60 M
Top Soil, clay, brown, soft, non plastisity, contain of root. 150
01.00
0,60 - 4,10 m
Clay, brown, soft, medium plastisity.
December, 02, 2013
02.00
Clay
150
03.00
150
04.00
Aluvial (River Deposite)
4,10 - 9,30 m
Gravelly sand, brown, sand loose, coarse sand, gravel form sandstone,
05.00
subrounded - rounded, max size 2 cm. 150
D
Gravelly sand
06.00
December,
03, 2013
100
07.00
90
08.00
90
09.00
December, 04, 2013
90
9,30 - 11,35 m
10.00
Sand, blackish grey, sand loose, fine to medium sand, wet.
Sand
100
0%
10,00 m
11.00
100
12.00
Tuffaceous 11,35 - 12,20 m
sand
v v v Tuffaceous sand, yellowish white, medium loose, medium to coarse sand.
100
12,20 - 14,50 m
Tuffaceous
13.00
v Tuffaceous clay, yellowish grey, soft, medium plastisity.
clay
100
v v
14.00
December, 05, 2013
Tuffaceous Sandstone
100
14,50 - 20,80 m
15.00
v Tuffaceous sandy clay, brownish grey, soft, mediun to coarse sand, sub-
100
v v angular to rounded. CL
Tuffaceous sandy clay
16.00
100
17.00
v
100
v v
18.00
December,
06, 2013
100
19.00
v
v v 100
20.00

8
BORING LOG
LOCATION : Dam site DATE : 02 - 18 Dec 2013
BORE HOLE NO BH-01 - I BORING METHOD : Coring Sampling
ROCK
WATER LEVEL
SAMPLING (m)
ROCK GRADE
SOIL/ CORE QUALITY
COULUM
GROUND
SOIL/ DESIGNATION
ROCK RECOVERY
DATE
(m)
Depth ROCK Description Cm (RQD) %
(m) UNIT TYPE SECTION (%) (%)
0 50 100 0 50 100
20.00 20,80 - 24,50 m #
100
v Tuffaceous clay, dark grey, soft, medium plasticity, #
21.00
v v
Tuffaceous clay
100
December, 06, 2013
22.00
#
100
v #
23.00
v v
100
#
24.00
v #
100
24,50 - 29,80 m
25.00
Tuffaceous sandy clay, greenish grey,soft, fine sand,
100
#
26.00
v #
100
v v
27.00
December, 07, 2013
100
#
28.00
v #
100
Tuffaceous sandstone
v v
29.00
100
v
30.00
0%
29,80 - 35,00 m CL
100
Tuffaceous cleyey sand, greenish grey, medium loose, fine sand,
31.00
Tuffaceous clayey sand
v
100
v v
32.00
100
33.00
v
100
v v
34.00
December, 08, 2013
100
35.00
35.00 - 39,00 m
100
v v v Tuffaceous sand, yellowish grey, medium loose - loose, coarse sand
36.00
Tuffaceous sand
100
v v v
37.00
100
38.00
v v v
100
39.00
Dec,09
Tuffaceous 39,00 - 40,00 m

100
40.00 sand v v v Tuffaceous sand, balckish grey, sand loose, fine to coarse sand

9
BORING LOG
LOCATION : Dam Site DATE : 02 - 18 Dec 2013
BORE HOLE NO BH - 01 - I BORING METHOD : Coring Sampling
ROCK
ROCK GRADE
CORE
LEVEL (m)
SAMPLING
GROUND
SOIL/ SOIL/ COULUM DESIGNATION
WATER
RECOVERY
DATE
(m)
Depth ROCK ROCK Description Cm (RQD) %
0 50 100 0 50 100
Dec,17, 2013 Dec,16, 2013 Dec,15, 2013 Dec,09, 2013
40.00 40,00 - 43,60 m #

100
v v v Tuffaceous sand, balckish grey, sand loose, fine to coarse sand #
Tuffaceous sand
41.00
Water loose at depth : 39.00 - 43.60 m
100
(Fault zone estimated)
42.00
v v v #
100
#
43.00
100
v v v 43,60 - 46,50 m #
0%
44.00 CL
Tuffaceous sand
Tuffaceous sand, yellowish grey, medium to coarse sand, sub angular- #

100
sub rounded.
45.00
v v v
100
#
46.00
#
Dec,18, 2013
100
v v
Tuffaceous
46,50 - 48,00 m
47.00
clay
Tuffaceaous clay, greenish grey, medium hard, non plasitsity.

100
v #
48.00
Finished core drilling 48.00 m #
49.00
60.00
61.00
62.00
63.00
64.00
65.00
66.00
67.00
68.00
69.00
740.00

10
BORING LOG
LOCATION : Dam Site DATE : 30 Dec - 2013 -06 January 2014
BORE HOLE NO : BH- 02- V BORING METHOD : Coring Sampling
ELEVATION : 88.00 m INCLINATIOIN : Vertikal
COORDINATE : X = 642226. Y = 9290882 DIAMETER OF HOLE : 73 mm
ROCK
ROCK CLASS
WEATHERE
CORE
LEVEL (m)
D GRADE
GROUND
WATER
DATE
DEPTH RECOVERY (RQD)

(m)
0 50 100 0 50 100
00.00 Top Sandy v v 0,00 - 1,00 m D
Soil Clay Top Soil, Sandy clay, brown,soft, non plastisity, consist bof root. 150
01.00
v v v 1,00 - 7,00 m
Descember, 30, 2013
Tuffaceous sand, light brown, medium dense, medium - coarse fine,sub -

02.00
angular - sub rounded, containt of tuff fragments 2,00 m 150
v v
Highly weathered
Tuffaceous sand
03.00
150
04.00
v v v
05.00
150
06.00
v v
100
January, 01, 2014
07.00
Clay 7,00 - 7,60 m
100
Clay, dark brown, soft, non plastisity, consist of sand.
08.00
v v v 7,60 - 15,00 m
100
Tuffaceous sand, light brown, medium dense, medium - coarse fine,sub -
09.00
angular - sub rounded, containt of tuff fragments
100
Highly weathered
10.00
0%
v v
Tuffaceous sand
100
CL
11.00
January, 02, 2014
100
12.00
v v v
100
13.00
100
v v
14.00
100
15.00
Sandy 15,00 - 16,00 m
100
January, 03, 2014
Clay Sandy clay, brownish grey, soft, non plastisity, fine sand, sub rounded.
16.00
16,00 - 20,00 m
Highly weathered
100
Tuffaceous sand, Yellowish grey, medium dense, medium - coarse fine,
17.00
Tuffaceous sand
v Subrounded.
100
v v
18.00
100
Jan,03,2014
19.00
100
20.00

11
BORING LOG
LOCATION : Dam Site DATE : 30 Dec - 2013 -06 January 2014
BORE HOLE NO BH- 02- V BORING METHOD : Coring Sampling
ROCK
WEATHERED
ROCK GRADE
SOIL/ CORE
LEVEL (m)
GROUND
SOIL/ COULUM DESIGNATION
WATER
GRADE
ROCK RECOVERY
DATE

0 50 100 0 50 100
Tuffaceo
us sand
20.00 20,00 - 21,00 m #

100
v Tuffaceous sand, light grey, medium dense, coarse fine, Sub rounded
January,03, 2014
#
21.00
21,00 - 23,50 m
100
Clay, dark grey, soft, medium plastisity.
22.00
Highly weathered
Clay
#
100
#
23.00
100
23,50 - 24,50 m #
Sand
24.00
Sand, ligth brown, medium - to coarse sand, sub angular-sub rounded, #
100
Tuffaceous consist of tuff material.
25.00
sand 24,50 - 25,50 m
100
January,04, 2014
Tuffaceous sand, grey, medium dense, medium to coarse sand. #

26.00
25,50 - 28,80 m #
100
Sandy clay
Sandy clay, greeinish grey, soft, non plastisity.

27.00
100
#
28.00
#
100
29.00
28,80 - 33,50 m
100
Tuffaceous sand, greenish grey, medium dense, medium coarse sand,
0%
30.00
Tuffacedous sand
v v v subrounded - rounded.
100
31.00
100
January,05, 2014
v v
Highly weathered
32.00
100
33.00
v v v
100
33,50 - 36,50 m
34.00
Sandy clay, brownish grey, soft, fine sand, sub rounde - rounded.
Sandy clay
100
35.00
100
36.00
100
January,06, 2014
36,50 - 38,00 m
37.00
Clay
Clay, greenish grey, soft, medium plastisity.

100
38.00
38,00 - 40,00 m
Sandy clay
100
Sandy clay, brownish grey, soft, coarse sand, subrounded - rounded.
39.00
100
40.00 Finished core drilling 40,00 m depth.

12
BORING LOG
LOCATION : Dam Site DATE : 20 - 25 January 2014
BORE HOLE NO : BH-03 - I BORING METHOD : Coring Sampling
ROCK
ROCK CLASS
CORE
Weathered
LEVEL (m)
GROUND
WATER
Grade
DATE

(m)
0 50 100 0 50 100
00.00 Top Soil Clay v v 0,00 - 0,40 M
Top Soil, sandy clay, brown, soft, non plastisity,fine sand, contain of root. 150
01.00
0,40 - 11,00 m
Tuffaceous sand, , whitnish brown, medium dense, fine sand,sub angular.
02.00
v v v 150
January, 20, 2014
03.00
150
04.00
v v
Highly weathered
Tuffaceous sand
05.00
150
06.00 CL
100
v v v
07.00
100
08.00
100
January, 21, 2014
09.00
v v
100
10.00
0%
100
11.00
v v v 11,00 - 16,40 m
100
Tuffaceous Clay, brownis white, soft, contain of quartz grain, non plastisity.
12.00
v v v
100
Highly weathered
Tuffaceous Clay
13.00
v
100
v v CL
14.00
100
January, 22, 2014
15.00
v
100
v v
16.00
100
16,40 - 20,10 m
17.00
v Tuffaceous sand, , brownish white, medium dense, coarse sand, containt
Tuffaceous sand
100
Highly weathered
v v of quartz materials, sub angular.

18.00
CL
100
v
19.00
v v
100
20.00

13
BORING LOG
LOCATION : Dam site DATE : 20 - 25 January 2014
BORE HOLE NO BH-03 - I BORING METHOD : Coring Sampling
ELEVATION : 62.00 m INCLINATIOIN 0
: 45
ROCK
ROCK GRADE
SOIL/ CORE
LEVEL (m)
SAMPLING
GROUND
WATER
ROCK RECOVERY
DATE
(m)
0 50 100 0 50 100
20.00 Tuffaceous 20,10 - 21.00 m #
100
Clay v Tuffaceous clay, brownish white, soft, medium plasticity. #
21.00
21,00 - 34,50 m
100
Tuffaceous sand, greenish white, medium dense, coarse sand, sub angular
22.00
contain of quartz material. #
100
January, 23, 2014
v v v #
23.00
100
#
24.00
#
100
v v v
25.00
100
#
26.00
#
Highly weathered
100
vv v v
Tuffaceous sand
27.00
100
#
28.00
#
100
29.00
v v v 29,00 m
100
0%
CL
January, 24, 2014
30.00
100
31.00
v v v
100
32.00
100
33.00
100
34.00
v v v
100
34,50 - 40,00 m
35.00
Tuffaceous sand, brownish white, medium dense, coarse sand,quartz sand
100
v v v
36.00
Tuffaceous sand
Highly weathered
January, 25, 2014
100
v v v
37.00
100
38.00
v v v
100
39.00
100
40.00 v v v Finished core drilling 40,00 m depth.

14
BORING LOG
LOCATION : Dam Site DATE : 21 - 26 December 2014
DEPTH : 40.00 m DRILLER :Aepudin
ROCK
ROCK CLASS
CORE
LEVEL (m)
SAMPLING
GROUND
WATER
DATE

(m)
0 50 100 0 50 100
00.00 v v 0,00 - 4,00 m
Sandy clay, redish brown, soft, non plastisity, consist of root. 150
01.00
December, 30, 2013
Sandy clay
02.00
150
03.00
150
04.00
4,00 - 7,30 m
Sandy clay and gravels
Sandy clay and gravels, dark grey, soft, non plastisity, medium - coarse
05.00
sand, gravel from sandstone, claystone max size 1 cm, subangular - sub - 150
rounded.
06.00
Aluvial (River Deposite)
December, 31, 2013
100
07.00
90
Sandy clay 7,30 - 8,10 m D
08.00
Sandy clay, balck, soft, medium plastisity,fine sand.
90
8,10 - 14,80 m
09.00
Clayey and gravely sand, blackish grey, non plastisity, medium - coarse
90
sand, sand loose, sub angular - rounded, consist of gravel max size 2 cm.
10.00
Clayey and gravelly sand
0%
gravel from sandstone, claystone and siltstone.
90
10,00 m
11.00
January 01, 2014
90
12.00
90
13.00
90
14.00
90
15.00
14,80 -18,15 m
100
January 02, 2014
v v Tuffaceous sandy clay, grenish grey, soft, medium to coarse sand, sub -
16.00
rounded, non plastisity.

100
17.00
v
CL 100
v v
18.00
18,15 - 19,90 m
Sandy clay
100
Jan,03,2014
Sandy clay, grey, soft, non plastisity, fine to medium sand.

19.00
100
20.00

15
BORING LOG
LOCATION : Dam Site DATE : 21 - 26 December 2014
ROCK
ROCK GRADE
SOIL/ CORE
LEVEL (m)
SAMPLING
GROUND
WATER
ROCK RECOVERY
DATE
(m)
0 50 100 0 50 100
20.00 19,90 - 22,10 m
Tuffacdeous
#
100
sanstone
v Tuffaceous Sandy clay, dark grey, soft, non plastisity, medium - coarse #
January,03,2014
21.00
v v sand, sub rounded - rounded.
100
22.00
22,10 - 27,00 m #
100
Clay, grey, soft, medium plastisity. #
23.00
100
#
24.00
#
Clay
100
25.00
100
january, 04 2014
#
26.00
#
100
27.00
27,00 - 30,15 m
100
Tuffaceous sand clay, grey, soft, non plastiscity, mediun - coarse sand, #
28.00
v sub rounded - rounded. #
100
v v
29.00
100
v
0%
30.00 CL
30,15 - 40,00 m
100
Sandy Clay, grey, soft, low plastisity, fine sand.
31.00
100
january, 05 2014
32.00
100
33.00
100
34.00
Sandy clay
100
35.00
100
36.00
100
january, 06 2014
37.00
100
38.00
100
39.00
100

16
BORING LOG
DEPTH : 40.00 m DRILLER :Aepudin
WATER LEVEL : 12.00 m LOGGER : Ketut Subekti
ROCK
ROCK CLASS
CORE
Weathered
LEVEL (m)
GROUND
WATER
Grade
DATE

(m)
0 50 100 0 50 100
00.00 Top Soil Sandy clay v v 0,00 - 0,60 m
100
Sandy clay, dark brown, soft, non plastisity, consist of root.
01.00
Sandy clay
0,60 - 3,25 m
D 100
January, 19, 2014
Sandy Clay, light browrn, soft, low plastisity.

02.00
100
03.00
Highlyweathered
3,25 - 8,10 m
100
Tuffaceaous sand, yellowish brown, medium dense, fine to medium sand,
04.00
v v v sub angular-subrounded.
Tuffaceous sand
100
05.00
CL 100
06.00
v v
100
07.00
100
08.00
v v v 8,10 - 20,00 m
Janujary, 20, 2014
100
Tuffaceaous sand, light brown, medium dense, coarse sand,
09.00
sub angular-subrounded.
100
10.00
0%
v v
100
10,00 m
11.00
100
12.00
v v v
100
Highly weathered
13.00
Tuffaceous sand
100
14.00 CL
v v
100
15.00
100
Janujary, 22, 2014
16.00
v v v
100
17.00
100
18.00
v v v
100
19.00
100
20.00

17
BORING LOG
WATER LEVEL : 12.00 m LOGGER : Ketut Subekti
ROCK
ROCK GRADE
SOIL/ CORE
Weathered
LEVEL (m)
GROUND
WATER
Grade
ROCK RECOVERY
DATE

0 50 100 0 50 100
20.00 20,90 - 25,10 m #
100
Tuffaceaous sand, light brown, medium dense, coarse sand,sub angular - #
21.00
subrounded.
Tuffaceeous sand
Highly weathered
100
v v v
22.00
#
CL 100
Janujary, 22, 2014
#
23.00
100
v v #
24.00
#
100
25.00
25,10 - 35,00 m
100
v Tuffaceous Clay, dark brown, soft, low plastisity. #
26.00
#
100
v
27.00
100
v v v #
28.00
v #
100
v v
Highly weathered
29.00
Tuffaceeous clay
100
v
0%
30.00 CL
100
Janujary, 23, 2014
31.00
v
100
32.00
100
v vv v
33.00
100
34.00
100
35.00
35,00 - 40,00 m
100
Tuffaceous sand, dark grey, medium dense, coarse sand, sub angular
36.00
Tuffaceeous sand
Highly weathered
100
v v v
37.00
Janujary, 24, 2014
CL 100
38.00
v v v
100
39.00
100

18
BORING LOG
LOCATION : TUNNEL DATE : 14 - 17 January, 2014
BORE HOLE NO : BH - 6.V. BORING METHOD : Coring Sampling
ELEVATION : 110 m INCLINATIOIN : Vertical
COORDINATE : X = 641853, Y = 9291116 DIAMETER OF HOLE : 73 mm
ROCK
ROCK CLASS
SOIL/ ROCK
SOIL/ ROCK
CORE
LEVEL (m)
SAMPLING
GROUND
COULUM DESIGNATION
WATER
DATE
DEPTH RECOVERY
TYPE
UNIT
(RQD)
(m)
(m)
Description Cm %
SECTION (%) (%)
0 50 100 0 50 100
00.00 Top soil Sandy clay V V 0,00 - 0,50 m D
100
Top Soil, Sandy clay, dark brown, loose, fine sand.
Tuffaceous sand
01.00
v v v 0,50 - 3,00 m
100
Tuffaceous sand, light brown, medium dense, fine to medium sand.
02.00
january,14, 2014
100
v v
03.00
3,00 - 5,00 m
Tuffaceous
100
v v v Tuffaceous clay, greenish grey, soft, low plasticity.
clay
04.00
100
05.00
5,00 - 10,00 m
100
Tuffaceous sand, greenish grey, medium dense, fine - coarse sand,
06.00
sub angular - sub rounded.
100
Tuffaceous sand
v v v 5,75 m
07.00
100
08.00
January,15, 2014
100
v vv
09.00
100
0%
10.00
10,00 - 12,70 m
Tuffaceous sand
CL
100
Tuffaceous sand, yellowish grey, sand loose, coarse sand, consist of
11.00
gravel and clay.
100
v v v
12.00
100
12,70 - 14,80 m
Tuffaceous clay
13.00
January,16, 2014
v v v Tuffaceous clay, brownish grey, soft, low plastisity.

100
14.00
100
v v v
15.00
14,80 - 20,00 m
100
Tuffaceous sand, brownish grey, medium dense, coarse sand.
16.00
100
Tuffaceous sand
v v v
17.00
January,17, 2014
100
18.00
100
v vv
19.00
100
20.00 Finished Core drilling 20,00 m depth.

19
KARIAN DAM PROJECT

LOCATION : DAM SITE
BH-01.I (48 M, DEPTH) < 45 0
Photo. 5 Boring BH-01-I, 48.00 m depth, Coord. X= 642062,Y= 9291008
KARIAN DAM PROJECT

LOCATION : DAM SITE
BH-04.V ( 40 M, DEPTH)
Photo. 6 Boring BH-04.V, 40.00 m depth, Coord. X= 642822,Y= 9279925

20
KARIAN DAM PROJECT

LOCATION : DAMSITE
BH-02.V (40 M, DEPTH)
Photo. 7 Boring BH-02-V, 40.00 m depth, Coord. X= 642226,Y= 9290882
KARIANN DAM PROJECT

LOCATION : DAM SITE
BH-3.I (40 M, DEPTH) <45
Photo. 8 Boring BH-03.I, 40.00 m depth, Coord. X= 641989,Y= 9291027

21
KARIAN DAM PROJECT

LOCATION : DAM SITE
BH - 05-V (40 M, DEPTH)
Photo. 9 Boring BH-05-V, 40.00 m depth, Coord. X= 641944,Y= 9291062
KARIAN DAM PROJECT

LOCATION : DAM SITE
BH-6.V. (20 M, DEPTH)
Photo. 10 Boring BH-06.V, 20.00 m depth, Coord. X= 641853,Y= 9291116

22

Report Fault

Caricato da

Informazioni sul documento

Titolo originale

Copyright

Formati disponibili

Condividi questo documento

Condividi o incorpora il documento

Opzioni di condivisione

Hai trovato utile questo documento?

Questo contenuto è inappropriato?

Copyright:

Formati disponibili

Report Fault

Caricato da

Copyright:

Formati disponibili

Consulting Supervision for Construction of

Karian Multipurpose Dam Project Review Design by Geologist / Grouting Engineer

Dam Site Fault Zone survey report

1. Review of existing report

2. Field geological survey of Karian dam fault zone

Korea Rural Community Corporation

1. Review of existing report

B. Matters that need to be examined in the existing report

Korea Rural Community Corporation

(photo 1 Satellite Photo by google)

Korea Rural Community Corporation

B. Fault and Active Fault

(2) Active fault

C. The Drilling survey direction and countermeasures

Korea Rural Community Corporation

picture 2 Boring survey planning in karian dam area

Korea Rural Community Corporation

(TABLE 1) ANALYSIS T.C.R OF DRILLING CORE

Korea Rural Community Corporation

Korea Rural Community Corporation

Korea Rural Community Corporation

Tuffaceous 39,00 - 40,00 m

Korea Rural Community Corporation

40.00 40,00 - 43,60 m #

Tuffaceous sand, yellowish grey, medium to coarse sand, sub angular- #

Tuffaceaous clay, greenish grey, medium hard, non plasitsity.

Korea Rural Community Corporation

DEPTH RECOVERY (RQD)

Tuffaceous sand, light brown, medium dense, medium - coarse fine,sub -

Korea Rural Community Corporation

Depth ROCK Description Cm (RQD) %

20.00 20,00 - 21,00 m #

Tuffaceous sand, grey, medium dense, medium to coarse sand. #

Sandy clay, greeinish grey, soft, non plastisity.

Clay, greenish grey, soft, medium plastisity.

Korea Rural Community Corporation

DEPTH RECOVERY (RQD)

v v of quartz materials, sub angular.

Korea Rural Community Corporation

Korea Rural Community Corporation

DEPTH RECOVERY (RQD)

rounded, non plastisity.

Sandy clay, grey, soft, non plastisity, fine to medium sand.

Korea Rural Community Corporation

Korea Rural Community Corporation

DEPTH RECOVERY (RQD)

Sandy Clay, light browrn, soft, low plastisity.

Korea Rural Community Corporation

Depth ROCK Description Cm (RQD) %

Korea Rural Community Corporation

v v v Tuffaceous clay, brownish grey, soft, low plastisity.

Korea Rural Community Corporation

KARIAN DAM PROJECT

Photo. 5 Boring BH-01-I, 48.00 m depth, Coord. X= 642062,Y= 9291008

KARIAN DAM PROJECT

Photo. 6 Boring BH-04.V, 40.00 m depth, Coord. X= 642822,Y= 9279925

Korea Rural Community Corporation

KARIAN DAM PROJECT

Photo. 7 Boring BH-02-V, 40.00 m depth, Coord. X= 642226,Y= 9290882

KARIANN DAM PROJECT

Photo. 8 Boring BH-03.I, 40.00 m depth, Coord. X= 641989,Y= 9291027

Korea Rural Community Corporation

KARIAN DAM PROJECT