Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
1590/1678-4162-7886
1
Faculdade de Agronomia, Medicina Veterinria e Zootecnica Universidade Federal de
Mato Grosso UFMT Cuiab, MT
2
Laboratrio de Endocrinologia PROVET Moema, SP
3
Center for Species Survival, Smithsonian Conservation Biology Institute, 1500
Remount Road, Front Royal, VA, 22630, USA.
ABSTRACT
In this study, four crab-eating fox females (Cerdocyon thous) maintained at the Federal University of
Mato Grosso Zoo, Cuiab, Brazil, were investigated for 12 months, using feces measurement of estradiol
and progesterone concentrations. Fecal collections were performed three times a week for hormone
extraction. Two methods of analysis, Elisa (EIA) and Radioimmunoassay (RIA), were used in the
measurement of progesterone (P4) and estradiol (E2) metabolites. The aim of this study was to compare
and validate two different methods of hormone measurement for C. thous. There were no differences
regarding the method used. The Radioimmunoassay technique proved to be more sensitive, however, both
showed similar results.
RESUMO
concentrations of gonadal steroids. Therefore, L), pH 7.0]. For measurement of P4 and E2 fecal
extraction and assay of hormones or other metabolite concentrations, a solid phase RIA
metabolites in feces and urine are of great (Coat-a-Count, Siemens, Los Angeles, CA,
importance in research centers and zoos, as USA), was conducted at the PROVET
virtually an unlimited number of samples can be Laboratory, So Paulo, SP, Brazil. These assays
collected without physical or chemical restraint were originally developed for quantitative
(Graham et al.,1995; Schwarzenbergeret al., evaluation of P4 and E2 human serum. Quality
1996a; Brown et al.,1997; Schwarzenberger, control of the hormonal assays was determined
2007). by intra- and interassay CVs. The percentage of
B/B0 binding, sensitivity, and minimum dose
The aim of the present study was to acquire new detected were analyzed. For fecal matrix assays,
knowledge regarding different techniques for a set of control samples that were measured in all
measurement of reproductive hormones in crab- hormonal tests was used, as these samples were
eating fox (C. thous) females. The specific submitted for extraction and dilution.
objectives were to compare two techniques: Elisa
(EIA) and Radioimmunoassay (RIA) for The P4 and E2 EIA were conducted at the Center
monitoring the reproductive cycle with a non- for Species Survival, Smithsonian Conservation
invasive technique, analyzing fecal metabolites Biology Institute/USA.
of progesterone (P4) and estradiol (E2).
For P4 EIA 25L of progesterone CL425
MATERIAL AND METHODS antibody (Coralie Munro, UC Davis, California)
in coating buffer [Na2CO3 (1.59g), NaHCO3
The study was carried out with four C. thous (2.93g), H2O Mili-Q (1L), pH (9.6)] (1:10,000)
females maintained at the Federal University of was pipetted on to NUNC microtitre plates and
Mato Grosso Zoo, Cuiab, MT, Brazil, during a incubated overnight at 4C. Plates were washed
12 month interval. Twice daily (morning and five times with MilliQH2O/Tween 20
afternoon), these foxes were fed commercial dog (1:500,000), then standards (4 200pg/well),
food, fruits (papaya and banana), and raw meat, low and high controls, each sample in duplicate
with ad libitum access to water. All procedures and progesterone HRP (Coralie Munro) in assay
were approved by the Committee for Ethics in buffer [Tris (2.42g), NaCl (17.9g), BSA (1g),
Animal Research of the University Tween 80 (1mL) H2O Mili-Q (1L), pH (7.5)]
(23108.002900/08-3) and SISBIO/IBAMA (1:20,000) was pipetted into the microtiter plate
(11167-1). wells and incubated for 2 h at room temperature.
Plates were washed again with
For fecal steroids, analyses samples of feces (for MilliQH2O/Tween 20 and 100 L of 40 L 0.5
determination of steroid hormone concentrations) H2O2, 125L 40mM ABTS and 12.5mL
were collected thrice weekly, between 7:00 and substrate buffer was added to each well. The
8:00. Samples were put into individual plastic absorbance was measured at 450nm/540nm,
bags, identified, and stored at -20C. Fecal using a DYNEX MRX reader (Dynex
hormone extraction was performed as described Technologies, Chantilly, VA, USA).
by (1996b), with minor modifications. Fecal
samples were thawed and mixed. Then, 0.5g was For E2 EIA, 20L of estrone conjugate R522-2
placed in a glass tube with 5.0mL of 80% antibody (Coralie Munro, UC Davis, California)
methanol and homogenized. Tubes were in coating buffer [Na2CO3 (1.59g), NaHCO3
vortexed (30 s) and gently homogenized for 15h. (2.93g), H2O Mili-Q (1L), pH (9.6)] (1:40,000)
Subsequently, samples were centrifuged (1,300g was pipetted onto NUNC microtitre plates and
for 15 min) and the supernatant kept in a water incubated overnight at 4C. Plates were washed
bath at 60C until total evaporation of the 80% five times with MilliQH2O/Tween 20
methanol. (1:500,000), then standards (10 200pg/well),
low and high controls, each sample in duplicate
Radioimmunoassay (RIA) samples were re- and estrone conjugate HRP (Coralie Munro) in
suspended in 1.0mL of methanol (PA) and assay buffer [Tris (2.42g), NaCl (17.9g), BSA
diluted in a gelatin buffer [NaPO4 (13.8 g), NaCl (1g), Tween 80 (1mL) H2O Mili-Q (1L), pH
(9.0g), sodium azide (1.0g) and distilled water (1 (7.5)] (1:20,000) was pipetted into the microtiter
Arq. Bras. Med. Vet. Zootec., v.68, n.3, p.636-640, 2016 637
Paz et al.
plate wells and incubated for 2 h at room concentration measured corresponds to the real
temperature. Plates were washed again with concentration.
MilliQH2O/Tween 20 and 100L of 40L 0.5
H2O2, 125L 40mM ABTS and 12.5mL The parallelism should indicate the correlation
substrate buffer was added to each well. The coefficient (r) near 1, being considered
absorbance was measured at 450nm/540nm, acceptable values of recovery from 0.85 to 1.15
using a DYNEX MRX reader (Dynex (Brown, 2008), and 0.9 to 1.10 (Graham, 2001).
Technologies, Chantilly, VA, USA). In our essay was verified parallelism between the
standard diagnostic set curve and the curve
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION obtained from the pool of females feces to
progesterone and estradiol. The values (r) found
Validation of commercial kits for use in feces were 0.98 for progesterone and 0.99 for estradiol
matrix for both hormones in this species was validating the use of commercial diagnostic kits
performed by the parallelism method using an used.
integral matrix. There was parallelism between
the commercial kit curve and dilution curve of Assay quality control is measured by the
the matrix studied. coefficient of variation (CV), which can be intra
or inter-assay. The intra-assay variation
Sensitivity and percentage of binding assay for coefficient determines the error associated with
P4 was 0.01ng/mL and 94%, and for E2 it was dosage of the same sample in one assay
1.73pg/mL and 94%. The highest limit of the (duplicate or triplicate) and the inter-assay
assays was 40.0ng/mL and 3.6pg/mL for P4 and determines the error observed when the same
E2, respectively. sample is dosed in different tests. The intra-and
inter-assay coefficients of variation should not
The fecal extract pool result across all assays was exceed 10% (Brown, 2008).
7.0% for P4 and 9.58% for E2. The intra- and
inter assay coefficients of variation for the assay Causes of change in the intra-assay coefficient of
were 9.78 and 5.46% (P4) and 5.60 and 1.19% variation generally result from the inadequate
(E2), respectively. Based on the hormonal assays presence of sample or tracer element, and may
of fecal metabolites, both P4 and E2 metabolites also be caused by insufficient mixing of the
were excreted in the feces of C. thous. sample or reagents or pipetting errors. Causes for
change in inter-assay coefficient of variation can
In this study, the mean peak of fecal P4 and E2 be instability of the reagents or errors on the
metabolites were 2.37 - 1.42ng/g and 157.95 - standard curve (Brown, 2008).
82.63pg/g, respectively.
In this experiment the intra and inter-assay
Validation is used to check the amount of variation coefficients did not exceed 10%,
hormone detected and possible interference in indicating that the procedure was performed
the assay. The first step for validation is within the expected quality criteria.
verifying the parallelism with the standard curve.
The standard curve indicates the sensitivity of Figure 1 shows the graphics for fecal estradiol
the test, checking the correlation between the and progesterone metabolite dosages using RIA
amount of hormone detected and correct dilution and EIA techniques in four Cerdocyoun thous
of the sample. Recovery tests are used to verify a females.
possible interference and indicate how the
638 Arq. Bras. Med. Vet. Zootec., v.68, n.3, p.636-640, 2016
Estradiol and progesterone
Female1
6 3000
400,0 8,0
5 2500
300,0 6,0
4 2000
RIA
EIA
RIA
EIA
RIAP4ng/gfeces
3 1500 EIAp4ng/gfeces 200,0 4,0
RIAE2ng/gfeces
EIAE2ng/gfeces
2 1000
100,0 2,0
1 500
0,0 0,0
0 0
8 8000
800 400
Female2
Female2
EIA
RIA
EIA
4 4000 400 200
RIAP4ng/gfeces RIAE2ng/gfeces
EIAP4ng/gfeces EIAE2ng/gfeces
1 1000 100 50
0 0 0 0
5 3500
Female 3 350 160
Female3
5
3000 140
300
120
2500 250
4
100
3
2000 200
RIA
EIA
RIA
EIA
3 80
RIAP4ng/gfeces RIAE2ng/gfeces
1500 EIAP4ng/gfeces 150 EIAE2ng/gfeces
2
60
2
1000 100
40
500 50
20
1
0 0 0 0
04/03/2008
11/03/2008
05/04/2008
15/04/2008
23/04/2008
01/05/2008
09/05/2008
21/05/2008
27/05/2008
03/06/2008
06/06/2008
12/06/2008
24/06/2008
01/07/2008
07/07/2008
17/07/2008
31/07/2008
16/08/2008
26/08/2008
02/09/2008
11/09/2008
16/09/2008
19/09/2008
25/09/2008
02/10/2008
10/10/2008
25/10/2008
06/11/2008
20/11/2008
27/11/2008
04/12/2008
12/12/2008
20/12/2008
04/03/2008
11/03/2008
05/04/2008
15/04/2008
23/04/2008
01/05/2008
09/05/2008
21/05/2008
27/05/2008
03/06/2008
06/06/2008
12/06/2008
24/06/2008
01/07/2008
07/07/2008
17/07/2008
31/07/2008
16/08/2008
26/08/2008
02/09/2008
11/09/2008
16/09/2008
19/09/2008
25/09/2008
02/10/2008
10/10/2008
25/10/2008
06/11/2008
20/11/2008
27/11/2008
04/12/2008
12/12/2008
3 1000
300 100
Female4 Female 4
900 90
250
800 80
70
700
200
2
60
600
RIA
EIA
150 50
RIA
EIA
500
RIAP4ng/gfeces RIAE2ng/gfeces
EIAP4ng/gfeces 40 EIAE2ng/gfeces
400
100
1
30
300
20
200 50
10
100
0 0
0 0
Figure 1. P4 (left) and E2 (right) RIA and EIA results for crab-eating fox (Cerdocyon thous) fecal
analysis.
Arq. Bras. Med. Vet. Zootec., v.68, n.3, p.636-640, 2016 639
Paz et al.
640 Arq. Bras. Med. Vet. Zootec., v.68, n.3, p.636-640, 2016