Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
Prerequisites
BECA 335; BECA major; departmental permission.
Learning Objectives
This class will build on previous studies and your practice of audio for video. Students
collaborate with video students creating documentaries, videos, television, and radio
commercials. Expect to be held to a professional standard.
Suggested Texts
Pro Tools 10 Power!, by Frank D. Cook, 2012
Designing Sound, by Andy Farnell, MIT Press, 2011
Producing Great Sound for Film and Video, Third Edition, by Jay Rose, Focal Press, 2008
The Sound Effects Bible, by Ric Viers, Michael Weise Productsions, 2008
Modern Recording Techniques, by Huber & Runstein, Focal Press, 2005
Audio Culture, Readings in Modern Music, by Christoph Cox, Continuum, 2004
The Microphone Book, by John Eargle, Focal Press, 2004
Sound Design, by David Sonnenschein. Michael Wiese Productions, 2002
Gaffers, Grips, & Best Boys, by Eric Taub, St. Martins Griffin, 1995
Audio-Vision, by Michel Chion. Columbia University Press, 1994
www.filmsound.org/articles/designing_for_sound.htm, sweetwater.com,
http://socialsounddesign.com, jeffjacoby.net.
Grading Criteria
Grades reflect the quality of work, engagement with material, and participation in class.
Late projects are deducted 10 points per week. Absent projects receive 0 points.
Each unexcused absence results in a 2% reduction from your overall grade.
Each unexcused lateness results in a 1% reduction from your overall grade.
More than three unexcused absences will result in course failure.
Assignment Descriptions
Project descriptions are posted on I-Learn. Projects will be shown in class.
Project 2: Final
The final project is your team's collaboration with advanced video students.
Execution
Is the work working? Does it have the intended impact? Was the presentation consistent
with a serious, professional approach? Did the project meet all the stated requirements? Were
the sonics (recordings, transfers, etc.) carefully handled? Does the mix allow the audience to
hear all elements? Were the effects in sync?
Effort
Did the amount of work reflect a genuine effort toward excellence and professionalism? Was
enough time spent to bring creative focus and a nuanced execution?
80-89: Project meets or exceeds expectations. Sonics are generally good and an effort was
made to create a high level of work to class, but there are some overarching an/or specific
issues in approach and/or execution that are discussed in critique to improve future projects.
70-79: Project meets some, but not all expectations, but the work shows a lack of truly
serious effort and/or poorly managed time. The sonics are generally good, but not handled as
carefully as they should be. Serious, overarching, and perhaps overwhelming issues are raised
and discussed in critique to improve future projects.
60-69: An attempt was made to fulfill expectations, however, the project demonstrates a clear
lack of commitment and/or time commitment and/or there are overwhelming issues in
approach and/or sonics that must be addressed in order to meet expectations. Critique is
used to help guide future projects.
Cheating, plagiarism, and copyright infringement will not be tolerated and may lead to
course failure and other disciplinary action by the University. Plagiarism is a form of
cheating or fraud; it occurs when a student misrepresents the work of another as his or her
own. Plagiarism may consist of using the ideas, sentences, paragraphs, or the whole text of
another without appropriate acknowledgment, but it also includes employing or allowing
another person to write or substantially alter work that a student then submits as his or her
own.
Students with disabilities who need reasonable accommodations are encouraged to contact
the instructor. The Disability Resource Center is available to facilitate the reasonable
accommodations process. The DPRC is located in the Student Service Building and can be
reached by telephone (voice/TTY 415-338-2472) or by email (dprc@sfsu.edu).
Weekly Schedule