Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
Ancient Egypt had by tradition a great variety of gods and what today
can be labeled as spirits and divine forces. Some were depicted just as
symbols and others had the form of living createures.
In total they were over 2.000(!) but many had similar characteristics and
appeared all over the country but with different names. This great diversity
is due to the fact that before the country was united the northern Nile
Valley was split up into about forty self ruling areas (later to be provinces -
called nomes) where the ruling tribes had their own deities and leaders.
From the dualism of all gods it's clear that animals were the first to get
divine status and by time got human form.
Because of this all gods had two things in common - they were family
members with counterparts from the opposite sex and manifested them-
selves on earth through animals.
Thus the local wild fauna of birds, crocodiles, snakes, turtles, frogs, plus
cattle, dogs, cats and other domesticated animals were considered to be
the living images of a particular god or goddess and a natural and
indestructible part of the environment in which people lived.
All parts of life were covered and there were gods for - beer, plants,
digestion, the high seas, female sexuality, gardens, partying etc. Many of
them had lots of duties and were with time combined with each other in a great number of ways.
Some of them could appear in rather unusual forms like a goddess (curious even by Egyptian
standards) having a head of a bee and body from a hippopotamus.
When having a glance at a depiction of them shown in upright position with human bodies, the
goddesses are easy to single out since they always had their legs joined together, while the males
used to be seen on the move - striding.
Shrines
As for the veneration of the gods scholars of Egyptology doesn't know exactly how this was made
during the oldest times, or at what point in history the main gods had cult areas replaced by
temples of their own.
One clue might be the god Min (see him) who obviously had a very old cult at Koptos in Upper
Egypt where two statues of him larger then life size were found in the late 1800s. They had no
doubt been situated within a sacred area or by a shrine of some sort, but no remains are left to
reconstruct what it may have looked like.
After the formation of two separate countries along the Nile (Upper and Lower Egypt) a typical
building came to be in each part, which more or less symbolized the country itself in both a
religious and political way and underlined its national identity.
It's most likely that local temples made of clay and reed originally were the cult buildings used by
tribes along the Nile, and with time two shrines were specified where people could make offers to
the main gods. Through their different designs it's easy locate the origin of old writings found
Clothing
When the goddesses and gods were depicted with a human body the variety wasn't so big in the
way they were dressed. Less then half a dozen types of garments covers almost all of them. From
the beginning they all wore white dresses, or at least single colored. This tradition slowly changed
over the years and with time the colors and patterns became elaborated. The peak was reached
during the Greco-Roman period when they were seen in outfits like actors in a costume spectacle
in a theatre.
Excluding the mummy-like creations, here is a type description in brief:
Pharaoh's crown
The gods had a lot of different things to put on their heads, and they surely did. In bright contrast
to the stereotyped positions of their bodies the painters and sculptors were keen on giving the
heads as much attention as possible. This was obviously initiated by pharaoh himself or the
priesthood in order to give their favorite gods as much promotion as possible. The different
crowns could give a hint where the god originally came from, and by wearing the combined crown
for the whole country, the message was given that this god or goddess was important to all
Egyptians. To make them conspicuous all crowns, hats etc. were adorned with plumes, horns,
snakes, flowers, sun discs, leaves etc painted in bright colors. Especially during the Greco-
Roman era the fantasy and elaboration was significant.
Besides royal crowns the gods had a lot of other symbols and things to wear upon their heads.
In some cases the headgear was necessary to identify the deities in ques-tion, when they were
dressed the same, as they often were. Here is a selection of per-sonal things helping to identify
which goddess is depicted in case the written hiero-glyphs don't give a clue. The following
objects below are shown as they looked when the bearer in question was facing right.
Neit had the a stylised form of her shield and crossed arrows on her head. Isis wore a throne on
top, a rather uncomfortable one it seems, and Mat had her standing ostrich feather she was
named after. Nephtys had a building topped with a bowl-like object (for collecting rain water?)
andNut had a pot (or a broad vase) upon her head.
Selkhet wore the dangerous scorpion (without its deadly sting), and Seshat had the holy Persea-
tree with two horns over it as her personal sign. Anat had a stylized cow's uterus as her
Most of these 18 objects worn upon their heads were unique for just one female deity, but
Hathor's solar disc in variations and Anit's object could be worn by others.
Especially the sun (symbolizing the god Re) was seen above the heads of many gods.
Regalia
All paintings, drawings, sculptures and reliefs in Egypt followed a traditional scheme, and
changes came slowly with time. Some artistic features did not alter anything at all, and remained
unchanged for over 3.000 years. The way of depicting people are among these unaltered
expressions of art. The body was normally in profile except for the torso which was shown from
the front like the eye, to make the face more expressive. The gods (and kings) depicted were
seldom empty handed - they usually carried various objects, and the symbolic meaning of some
are still obscure to Egypto-logists. The gods usually had the well known ankh-sign in one of their
hands, with the general meaning "life", and also to be interpreted as joy of living. Since the
Egyptian religion offered eternal life for those who had behaved well on earth, we don't know if
this sign of life meant the next or the present one - or possibly both.
The other hand was holding a staff or scepter of some kind, and here we have half a dozen types.
Goddesses usually had a scepter topped with a flower in different colors (like a white lily from the
Nile) but this was seldom seen among the gods, possibly because it gave a more soft impression
to the observer.
Very common through all times was the Was-scepter for "command" (see pictures below) and
some gods, like Ptah and Osiris, had their own type of this staff.
In the very beginning of time Osiris was king over Egypt and his queen (and
sister) was the goddess Isis.
He was beloved by the people whom he told how to worship the gods and
grow their crops for their daily bread. His brother Set became jealous and
tried to overthrow him and become king himself. When participating in a
feast with Osiris as host, Set began to describe a beautiful coffin he had, in
a way that made the other guests curious.
Osiris
One day she heard that a wonderful tree had sprung on the shores of Byblos in the
north on the Eastern coast of the Mediterranean Sea, where the local king had cut it
down and built a palace from it.
Isis understood that this was the place where the coffin had come to
shore and she went there in disguise. She got a job at the court as a
hairdresser for the queen and now when she could walk freely
inside the castle she began to look for the coffin, and finally she
found it in a remote chamber.
During the night she managed to snatch it and embarked a boat Isis
heading for Egypt. When she came there she hid in the marshlands
in the delta. There she opened the coffin and took a last farewell of her beloved
husband Osiris and began searching for a suitable place to bury him. But Set
was aware of all this and was hiding nearby. When Isis went to rest for the night
he snatched the coffin and cut his brother's body into fourteen pieces and
spread them all over Egypt. Isis became furious and asked her
sister Nephthys and her son Anubis, to help her to find all the pieces of her
husband's body.
They now started a nation wide search that lasted for many
years and finally all the part of Osiris' body were found except
for the penis which had been thrown into the Nile where it was
Horus devoured by a fish.
Isis made a wooden replacement for it and then put the whole
body together. She now asked the sun god Re to make her husband alive just for
one day, which he did, and they could have a last night of love together. The next
day Osiris died and his body was embalmed by Anubis who thus made him the
first mummy. Isis later gave birth to a son who was named Horus and she did all
she could to keep it a secret from Set, but he found them and almost killed them
in an ambush.
They were saved by the god of wisdom - Thoth, and he told them
to hide in the reeds in the marshes once more. But as before Set
found their hiding place and had more wicked things on his
mind. He transformed himself into a snake and gave the little
Horus child a fatal bite. Set
When Isis came back she found her baby almost lifeless, and took him to the
nearest village to get help. A wise old woman examined him and found out that it
must have been Set as a snake who had bitten him. Thoth came to their rescue
once more and drove out the poison from Horus' body and he recovered. He and
his mother stayed hiding in the delta until he was a mature man and sometimes
he took the form of a hawk and scouted out Set for the final showdown - the
revenge on his murdered father. When that moment came they fought for three
days until Thoth stopped the fight. They were both taken to the Court of Law in
the Underworld and there they presented their versions of the story leading to the
combat. The Court did not believe Set, who was sentenced to pull the boat with
the sun across the sky forever. Horus now became the new king of Egypt like his
father Osiris before him, and the good had finally conquered evil.
Thoth Isis put the body of her dead husband in a coffin and had nineteen identical
coffins made in which she put duplicates. Priest from Egypt's twenty biggest
Legends of creation
Ancient Egypt had different stories telling about how the world and all its inhabitants once came
to be. The legends varied from province to province along the Nile, but after the unification a
handful of them grew more popular and others were forgotten.
The priesthood in the cult centers of the creator-gods supported their own version and thus we
meet gods like Atum, Re, Ptah, Khnum and Kheper performing the act as The Great Maker, but in
different ways. There are no Deluge-legends involved in any of the creation stories of the Nile-
people, probably because they had their own big flood every year and the beginning of everything
couldn't possibly involve a banality like that.
The most common and probably one of the oldest stories, said that at the dawn of time there was
nothing but the water called Nun, and the first ground coming out of it was a rock called the "Ben-
Ben stone". From a slightly irregular shape at the begin- ning, with time it was elaborated and
turned into a broad and short obelisk with a pointed top in a four-side pyramid fashion. Some
scholars suggest that this might be the prototype for later pyramids tombs, but others do not.
On the Ben-Ben stone stood Atum and he coughed and spat out Shu and Tefnut.
3) In Sais (in the delta in Lower Egypt) the priests taught the people that their own mighty godd-
ess Neit was behind the origin of the other gods. She was self-begotten and self-produced and
mother of the mighty solar god Re.
4) Another story tells that the creation of The World was wet and dark and Atum-Re arose from the
Nun and appointed the eight reptile gods above (the so called Ogdoad) to their proper places and
brought order from chaos. Here the frogs Niau and Niaut have been changed for Amon and
Amonet which tells that this version is of later date (New Kingdom) when Amon had reached a
lofty position among the gods.
If the heart of the deceased wasn't too heavy with sins from his life on Earth, he went through and
could continue his voyage to the afterlife and was granted a plot of land in the "Field of the
Reeds". This was the paradise for the ancient Egyptians - to grow crops for eternity in a land that
was the very image of the Nile Valley they just had left.
If he failed the test on the other hand - his heart was immediately devoured by the beast Ammut
sitting under the scale ready to have a good blow-out. In that case the dead faced the most
horrible future imaginable for the Egyptians - he was denied an eternal life in the land in the West
and his soul would be restless forever.
The Egyptians believed that every person (during life and after) was followed by an invisible
double called - Ka. He was created at the moment of birth and stood for "force of live" for the
person. He could not be seen or depicted but all big tombs had a "blind door" for him to use. After
death a transformation of rebirth took place and every night he was released to give his dead
master a spiritual travel to the land of the living. The travel itself was made by his soul Ba (see
beyond). This was a link from the tomb to life on earth that was supposed to go on forever.
The poor commoners who couldn't afford an embalming were offered small simple statuettes of
mummies to give their Ka someone to stand beside in the life beyond and thereby please their life-
long companion and get eternal rest themselves.
Ka (left) walking
beside the body
and Ba who was
dwelling within.
The human soul was called - Ba and was depicted as a bird with a human face, sometimes with
the features of the dead person. The Ba (like Ka) appeared for the first time at the moment of birth,
The boat was not provided with sails, but had another way to get power to move. It was simply
pulled across the sky by the evil god Set who had been condemned to do so for killing his brother
Osiris (as told in the Myth of Osiris above).
At night the god Upuaut stood on the prow and navigation was assisted by pilot fish Abtu and
Ant, who swam in front of the boat.
The crew consisted of the gods Geb and Heka plus the companions Hu and Sia. They all helped
Re to overcome the obstacles set up by those who tried to stop his journey - the three monsters
Sebau, Nak, and Apep. The evil creature Apep was the most dangerous one and he took the shape
of a big snake or a crocodile.
Under the protection of war god Maahes, Re fought and killed the monsters every day and thus
secured the way for the sun to rise the next morning. By then the participants were all alive and
kicking again and the daily combat could begin as usual.
Cloudy days were scary to the Egyptians because it might be that Apep had stopped Re in his
By begging Re to come
back in the morning the
Egyptians hoped that daily
life should go on as usual.
Since agriculture was the
base of the country, the life
giving sun was essen- tial
for people's well being and
existents.
Scene from a prayer book.
The most critical days, that thankfully did not come often, were those with solar eclipses in
different stages. It seemed that Apep was swallowing up the sun, but somehow, after extra
ceremonies, Re turned out to be the winner in the end. There were even manuals for people to
help to fight this evil snake/crocodile that could jump up from the heavenly waters and attack the
boat and the people onboard. Even the otherwise bad god Set took part in the struggle, besides
pulling the boat, which underlines the importance of the mission.
The essence of this myth is that the sun (symbolizing life itself) was a constant struggle. A lifetime
for a man was a similar voyage with the birth and peak of living at noon. At twilight life was
coming to an end and people finally reach the glorious Land In the West - the next World, after
their short stay on Earth.
By venerating the gods who struggled every day to make the life-giving sun keep shining, order
and stability was secured. This was what the chief navigator goddess Mat stood for and she
always managed to get the old barge to port.
Burial customs
The basic purpose of mortuary preparation was to ensure the deceased a successful passage into
the next world. The tombs were from the very beginning shallow holes in the sand later to be lined
with a wall of sun dried bricks or stones and topped by a mound of sand or clay. The
substructures were elaborated downwards when pits leading to grave chambers were cut out in
the bedrock starting around 3200 BC. The structures above ground developed into bench-like
brick buildings (mastabas) later to be made of stone and ending with the great pyramids 2.400 BC,
a time span of evo- lution for almost half a millennium.
The amount of grave goods and offerings (for wealthy people) was increasing and be- came more
sophisticated and progress was also seen in the treatment of the body of the deceased - the
mummification. This custom first appeared also in about 3200 BC. and steadily progressed
technically for the next 2.000 years from simple dehydration (made by the dry climate) to prepa-
rations with chemicals.
Originally the dead was placed in a crunched position lying on the side, but with time traditions
changed and they were stretched out on their backs.
The religious belief was that the body should be preserved intact for the soul to dwell within in the
next world. This made kings and other royalties hide their dead protected under mountains of
stone (pyramids) and later in secret hideouts in the desert cliffs. Unfortunately the huge
monuments draw attension from poor people, and Egyptians never separated the valuable
offerings and grave goods from the mummies, which made the robbers plunder it all during
periods of political instability.
Thus the great kings from the Old Kingdom did not come to "the Field of Reeds" after death
despite (or more accurate: just because) they tried to protect themselves under mountains of
stone, which draw attention to everybody, not the least tomb robbers.
The next world was located in more than one place both in a physical and a religious
(metaphysical) sense. It could be 1) in the area around the tomb, 2) among the stars, 3) in the
celestial regions with the sun god or 4) in the Underworld itself.
All places had one thing in common: they were all located in "The Beautiful West" where the day
(and life) ended with the setting sun.
The journey to the next world was fraught with obstacles in the Underworld. It was a trip by boat
through many gates with tricky questions to answer. The judgement after death (see "the Book of
the Dead" above) was a subject often depicted from the New Kingdom and onwards. The belief
itself was much older, probably from before the first dynasty 2000 years earlier. It was the final
judgement whether the deceased had been a good human being or not. Most of them (with means)
could pass by giving offerings to the gods and making declarations about their good behavior on
Earth, true or not.
The Earliest Cultures South and North History Begins The 42 provinces
Origin of the Egyptians Eye Makeup Sumerian Connection Hieroglyphs
Records Early Kings The Unification The Royal Cemetery Pharaoh's titles
The first signs of human activity in the area which today is Egypt, dates
back around 500,000 years. Pebbles and stone axes from the Abu
Simbel region in the far south have been estimated to be of this age.
The majority of the stone age finds are 90.000 to 250.000 years old and
the materials are mostly the stones quartzite and basalt. These
remnants are surely from the dawn of man and not from our own clever
and imaginetive sort Homo Sapiens Sapiens.
The first fragments of "real" humans and an organized society are from
Qadan (250 km south of Aswan) and date back to circa 13.000 to 9.000
BC. and have the first cemeteries with ritual burials.
In the 1890s some remarkable finds were made at the old town of Nekhen, called Hierakonpolis
(Falcon City) by the Greeks. It was situated 140 km south of todays Luxor (yesterday's Thebes) and
placed upon a rocky plateau 400 m out in the flood plain from the western bank of the Nile, which
made it easy to defend during the flooding season when it was surrounded by water. The
foundations and remains of a royal palace told that this was the place where the earliest kings had
resided. Under the ground outside the temple was a cache containing lots of remains from the
earliest pharaohs, and it was obviously brought her for safe keeping from the cemetery at Abydos
up north and possibly some other royal burial ground not yet found. Among the finds were several
figures of clay, ceramics, ivory, stone and bone (picture below) and some types (possibly local)
were never to be seen again in Egyptian art after the start of the first dynasty.
Some small figures made of ivory depicted a god with a broad beard and sometimes a helmet like
cap on his head. He might be the god of fertility - Min, at least in the version with a bald head (see
"Nagada" by the picture atop). If the female figurines are early prototypes for later goddesses is not
known, but the sleeve-less cloak around one of them (above) is very unusual. (See the link "old
king" in the text of king Ka below).
Extensive investigations starting in 2002 have revealed a lot about this oldest royal temple in Egypt,
the Hierakonpolis center. It went through at least three big changes (enlargements) during the time
prior to the union of the countries in around 3.200 BC. In the cemetery of the elite has been found
quite elaborated tombs with offerings dating back as long as 3.700 BC. This unex-pected fact gives
The ancient Egyptians were in general slim hipped with rather broad shoulders and oval faces was
in majority. They depicted themselves with long straight noses from the earliest times through
portraits made in later periods. (Pictures right are from 1.500 and 3.200 BC).
The women hardly never got plump and had no tendency to a large behind like their black sisters
further south did. Their hair color was usually black to dark brown.
More light skinned individuals were present especially in the coastal area west of the Nile delta
among the Libyan tribes (see below).
Considering the homogeneity of the people a fair assumption is that most of the Egyptians have
entered the Nile Valley from the north (and from the now gone savannas west of the river) and
spread to the Red Sea in the east. In the south they stopped at the cataract of Aswan, where the
fruitful shores of mud ended and were replaced by cliffs. This point was for thousands of years the
natural lower border of Egypt, separating them from the black inhabitants further south by a vast
stretch of wasteland.
The first "cultural" remains found are, at the earliest, from around 13,000 BC. These traces are too
few for making conclusions about those who left them. When the annual floods with its fertilizing
mud started grass began to grow by the shores and hunters had possibility to get prey, and this did
not begin to an extent until after the latest Ice Age as recent as around 8,000 BC.
The western part of today's Egypt is just the sterile Sahara desert. Archaeology has shown that
long before and during the Later Stone Age (neoliticum, beginning around 6.000 B.C.) people lived
here as hunters and had a type of culture which to a big part was very similar to the one by the Nile
(Hoffman: Egypt Before the Pharaohs" 1979).
Furthermore, ancient rock art in the mountains show hunters, pray and dometicated ani- mals, but
the lack of dwelling and tombs makes it all difficult to date the single remains. Scholars estimate
within a span of 10.000 to 3.000 years BC. Nontheless this clearly indicates that this region which
then was a savannah, provided the Nile Valley with immigrants and possibly vice versa. As late as
during the Old Kingdom these so called "sand dwellers" (Egyptian name) were many enough to
disurb the state by the Nile which had to take military actions against them bringing back prisoners
and live stock to Egypt.
In the ealiest days the people by the Nile were hunters too, but had additional skills compared to
their neighbors in the deserts. They were used to water and used boats and rafts, could catch fowl,
fish and hunted game like crocodiles and hippos.
In around 5,000 B.C. agriculture came to the Nile Valley and the population increased considerably.
By this time the region had rain falls making the desert areas now flanking the river a grass land
feeding animals like buffaloes, giraffes, gazelles, and present were also the feline predators lions
and cheetas. Then the climate constantly got drier and at the beginning of dynastic times most of
the big grass eaters were extinct. By 2,000 years BC rain falls did appear just occasion-ally and the
nomads in the western savannas were the first ones to abandon their hunting grounds. Activities
(like small scale agriculture) was from now on possible only in the big oases. To maintain the food
supply (crops) the Egyptians had to store and transport water from the river and this could only be
done through canal- and dam building in a huge scale. An firm organization was needed to realize
this and the centralized power was established since the original tribe areas and their chiefs were
inadequate in size to perform such a great task themselves.
The Eastern Mountains towards the Red Sea probably never had any vast grass areas like the
western regions did. Living conditions here were more suitable for small live stock breeding with
animals like goats and sheep. Pictorial remains from the inhabitants are remarkably many, and new
ones are found by hundreds every year today (2007). These pictures have a significant and common
motif which is lacking in the mountains west of the Nile - boats.
This area seems to have been fairly occupied at least until the end of the Old Kingdom. Thereafter
the mountaineers probably got fewer and are not mentioned specifically in hieroglyphic texts any
more. The Egyptian name meaning "easterners" (see text by the picture above) was used also to
designate peoples coming from Asia, mostly those from the Middle East region.
The "real" Egyptians were the farmers by the Nile with their high and developed culture, and they
always considered themselves a separate people from their close neighbors though we can assume
that they shared the same language. These relatives disturbed the Egyptian trade routs through
robbery etc. and this was the main reason for hostility between these cousins.
The Egyptian army was constantly kept alert by maintaining security for their export and import
passing these areas. The Egyptian (slightly degrading) name for inhabitants here was "mountain
dwellers" an analogue to the people in Sahara westbound being called "sand dwellers".
The scene on a knife handle mentioned above shows two types of boats. The ones with a high
prows are believed to be from the northern delta - Lower Egypt - and made of papyrus. The
Egyptians living there called their country "Ta-mehu", the land of the papyrus.
The others boats have their origin in southern - Upper Egypt - "Ta-schema", the land of the reed,
and seem to be partly made of wood. The cabins are different too as shown in the "painted grave"
from Hierakonpolis (see picture in chapter "The historical records" below).
The high prowed boats also occur in Sumeria but there is no evidence that they were brought to the
Nile Valley by invaders or even was a cultural import for that matter, because the reed/papyrus
material simply make this the only practical way of constructing such a boat.
In the mountains in the East Desert from the possible path of the "invaders" a large
number of stone carvings have been found, where boats (often big ones) play a leading
roll. It is obvious that this vehicle played a major part in Egyptian society already in
prehistoric times but there is no evidence that these vessels were for sailing on the
high seas, and the more modest strip of water called the Nile (during the inundation
up to 60 km across) would have been enough.
At the beginning of the 1900's archaeologists examined the skeletal remains of the
earliest graves and found that the remains of the ruling class" indicated that they might
have been of heavier stature than the Egyptians in general. This was the ground for
Cylinder seal, the belief that these had come from outside the country.
cultural import
Evidence of cultural influence from Sumeria before the unification is proven, but
from Sumeria
genetic influence to a notable extent is not.
The newcomers were believed to have brought a falcon god into Egypt and were called after him -
"The followers of Horus". The physical statures of the oldest kings are not known, but remains and
depictions of those from dynasties 0-4 tell that some were heavy-built with broad faces, but
variations within the families were frequent.
The most significant influence from Sumeria was the facade of the royal palace. This was an insignia
for the king, depicted in a stylized way and called a "serek". It came into use before dynasty 1, as
did the new style of mud brick masonry in northern Egypt used in the mastaba-tombs.
<="" a="">
Hieroglyphs - and Egyptian writing
A very early attempt to descript hieroglyphs was made during the 9th and 10th century. Then an
Arab speaking writer and alchemist named Ibn Wahshiyah is said to have had some progress in
finding Coptic words and sounds from hieroglyphic texts. His manuscripts were translated into
English and published in London in 1806 but have never been referred to by scholars.
Since modern Egyptology started at the end of the 1800s, additional stones has constantly been
added to the building of the Egyptian language and have been put in their proper floor, due to the
fact that many changes were made during its long life of at least 3,500 years.
<="" a="">
The historical records
During the 1990s old sites of archaeological interest were dug up again after 100 years, and new
methods brought a fresh light to old conclusions made by scholars of yesterday. We have reason
to believe that prior to the unification progress in various sectors of society like agriculture,
breeding of cattle, metalwork, etc was the same in the delta as in the valley itself. Unfortunately
knowledge of the north is practically nothing from this period, but from the south the development
can be well observed through the advances of modern archaeology. The first areas with centralized
power, "mini kingdoms", were placed around the big "knee" of the Nile, where the water strikes
hard rocks of granite and has to make a right (eastern) turn. These main areas were at This (north
of Abydos), Nagada and above all Hierakonpolis 40 km south of today's Luxor. (See map at top of
page).
At Hierakonpolis a huge fortified area with a temple was dug up in the 1890s. Luckily many objects
from the oldest times to the sixth dynasty were found in a cache called "the Main Deposit" in the
temple yard. The town was situated on an island in the Nile and thus easy to protect, because armed
struggle for power was significant for this time, at least from evidence in remains like grave goods
By the advent of the 12th dynasty in around 2 000 BC the ruler had adopted no
less then five titles in his presentation on monuments and in writings.
The oldest of them was the so called "Horus Name" which is attested for as far
back as when writing began and it was from the beginning connected to the
falcon god Hor (Greek: Horus) which stood for the king himself as a person. The
bird was usually put atop of a rectangular box (a so called serek seen in the
picture left) which symbolized the royal palace and its fancy mud brick facade,
and gates, shown in stripes and squares at the bottom. The picture left shows
the Horus name of king Qaa of the first dynasty.
The well known name "Pharaoh" is a late Greek corruption of two Egyptian
words meaning - great house. From the Greek period (200s BC) and onwards it
was used in writing, just with phonetic hieroglyphs and letters without having a
symbol of its own, and in a context like today's words "His Majesty".
The Horus name
The Nomen was given to the king to be when he was born, and was thus realy a
personal name by which he was called by his family members. From dynasty four
the prefix "Son of Re" was added by a goose (son of) and
the solar disk for Re. It was written within a cartouche
from the third dynasty and onwards. Sometimes the
words "The Good God" could be written just before the
name to put a divine touch to the name of the human
The Son of Re person who could be called Senwosret, Seti or
Amenemhet. The picture right shows this type of personal name from dynasty six, simply saying -
Pepi son of Re.
The question over the years has been if tradition is right about a single military attack from the
south invading the north, and the answer is most likely - it's not. Narmer isn't the only king who
showed himself as the winner smiting enemies and wearing both crowns, because so did Scorpion.
And if Menes wasn't identical with any of those, we have three kings as the presumed founders of
dynasty number one. The theory that's most likely is that it took a long time - maybe generations,
to make Egypt one, and thus we have a possible founder who was the first to rule over the whole
Nile valley. King Aha (see dynasty 1) is a strong candidate for this post since he is the first one to
be present with substantial monuments in both parts of the country.
The only one of these records that was made to give a correct version of the history, is the list of
Manetho. The others were all made for different purposes, not entirely known.
The Palermo and Cairo stones are possibly in a class all by themselves, and so is the Canon of
Turin, written on papyrus. The lists from Karnak and Abydos are both parts of temple decora-tions
and obviously some kings are deliberately omitted for being either too insignificant or politically
incorrect in some way.
The Sakkara list on the other hand, is the only "private" record of substance, coming from a tomb
of a caretaker of cults for dead kings.
By combining these records scholars have got a rather good picture of the order of kings, but the
time span for the earliest dynasties and the order of some rulers (from dynasties 2 and 3) is still a
subject of discussion.
The Palermo stone was a part of a bigger stone slab on which the Egyptians recorded the events
for each year for the earliest kings, and the present one during its making - the fifth dynasty. In the
top row kings from before the unification are noted and if they have existed they are the oldest
persons on earth recorded by their names. In this case the kings from Lower Egypt are those who
have been saved for later times, and in a another similar stone (more damaged) called the Cairo
stone, the rulers from Upper Egypt are depicted but the part with their names is missing. Notable is
that these stones are the oldest records of its kind, and the recording was made at least 600 years
after the unification in around 3.200 BC by the mythical king Menes.
This may seem a long time, but Manetho who made his work nearly 3.000 years after Menes, has
been proven to be correct by archaeology in many cases where other sources have failed or said
otherwise. This shows that the Egyptians kept records of their history, but they were not so keen
on publishing it. Manetho was probably given the task by the king himself, probably one of the two
first in line by the name Ptolmaios. They were of Greek decent and had another view of history and
were not bound to Egyptian traditions. Therefor we can assume (hope) that Manetho (though he
was an Egyptian himself) had a more neutral and "scientific" approach and didn't omit insignificant
and politically "incorrect" rulers from the past that we know was common. His original writings are
regrettably lost, but vital parts have survived through rewritten list made by others which has
effected the content in a negative way. The most quoted of them is a Roman Christian historian
called Africanus who lived in the 3rd century AD.
The Unification
About seven rulers from the second dynasty are without monuments at Abydos, and are most likely
buried in Sakkara. From the third dynasty and onwards the Abydos cemetery wasn't used for royal
burials.
Another fact is that the tombs in the south were all considerably smaller and cruder than those in
the north. But inscribed remains with the names of the kings and side burials (of retainers) were
more frequent in the south, where also half a dozen large enclosed areas were built, obviously for
ceremonies in the cults of the dead pharaohs. The tombs at Abydos were irre-gular rectangular
constructions, built on sand and gravel nearly two kilometers from the Nile. They were obviously
built to be under ground, perhaps with a low wall on the surface imitating the form of the house the
king had resided in during his reign. In Memphis on the other hand, they were fancy rectangular
mud brick mastabas in a northern fashion with slightly sloping walls above ground, and with time
with larger underground chambers hewn down into the bedrock. They stood right on the high
escarpment overlooking the Nile Valley and the capital below and some of them were decorated
with symmetrical patterns painted in bright colors.
The style with sloping walls and recesses (see picture below) was an influence from the Sumerian
culture in Mesopotamia, and went out of fashion at the end of the second dynasty. By that time the
royal court and the administration had moved permanently to Memphis and the southern burial
ground was abandoned for good.
When looking at the style of tombs from royalties and high officials it's not difficult to conclude that
they were reflections of their residences during their earthly life. All the rooms filled with gifts and
all kinds of supplies for the next life, were in life various store rooms for the big household. The
dead shouldn't miss anything from his former life and therefore he also had his bathroom and
lavatory. The chamber with his mummy was of course his bedroom where he now could sleep for
eternal times. As to his harem and other employees in housekeeping it's clear that parts of the staff
of the first kings were sacrificed and followed their master into the next world, but this tradition
disappeared rather quickly. During the first dynasty lots of large mastaba graves were built in
Sakkara, but their contents (in some unique cases undisturbed for nearly 5.000 years) do not point
out for sure that the monument was a tomb for a king. Names of high officials and kings have been
found, and if the owners were officials, the tombs were much bigger and more elaborated than those
of the kings in Abydos. It doesn't seem logical to us, but we don't know the Egyptians' reflections
about it, so this issue has to be unanswered for the time being.
When the first dynasty kings built their tombs in Abydos, things were also happening in the
capital Memphis at the burial ground in Sakkara. On the high desert edge overlooking the capital
and the fertile valley, about 20 large mastabas were built during the c. 175 years of the first dynasty.
The size, type and technical improvements shown in these have no counterparts in Abydos, and
some archaeologists, among them the one the who dug out most of them, thought that these were
the tombs where the kings had been buried. Today the opinion is different due to the fact that more
and more of old monuments (except royal tombs) have been uncovered in Abydos such as large
enclosed areas with thick brick walls and a dozen boat graves from the oldest dynasties.
Nevertheless the Sakkara tombs shows astonishing improvements as the tombs through the years
got an increasing part under ground in the bedrock. Furthermore we have the fact that some
monuments had side burials for servants. The one with the most (dated to the reign of Djer) had 62.
During the reign of Ka the first self supporting vault ever known in the history of architecture was
built.
The general answer to the question who were the owners of these great tombs is: high officials. For
the first and last time in Egyptian history the royal court had been overshadowed in tomb prosperity
by bureaucrats, if this is the right answer. Royal power thus did not gain land from the high officials
in the first 150 years of the existence of the united Egyptian state. It's interesting to make a
comparison between monuments from the first king Aha. The difference between one of his three
separate chambers that made his monument in Abydos, and a mastaba from Memphis' cemetery.
Technical advances
During the second dynasty the Egyptians had performed with brilliant skill in working in hard stone.
The statue of Khasekhemwy from dynasty two is so far the best example of this achievement, with
shaped and polished surfaces in hard stone. On the east bank of the Nile opposite Sakkara, dozens
of graves from wealthy non-royal inhabitants of Memphis were buried in tombs where the
substructures were built of large blocks of fine shaped stones. Notable is that in these days the
hardest metal known by the Egyptians was copper and at this time bronze came into use (a bowl
from Khasekhemwy is known) and to cut out the bedrock they had to use implements made of hard
stone (dolerite). This was the only way they could work for a thousand years(!) when finally tools
made of the new hard metal - iron, came into use.
Noticing the quality of these tombs of lower officials, archaeologists had reason to believe that the
three first kings of the second dynasty whose tombs were not to be found at the cemetery in Abydos
- Raneb, Nynetjer and Hetepsekhemwy had their last resting places hidden somewhere under the
sand in Sakkara, and finds from the beginning of the twentieth century seem to con- firm this
suggestion. There the building of tombs had taken a new big step downwards under ground, and
the developing of new technique in cutting stone and tunneling in the bedrock made it possible to
elaborate the final resting places of the kings. A new era had begun and the Egyptians were able to
master the hardest of stones to make anything from small statuettes to huge monuments.
It was in Sakkara, the necropolis of the capital Memphis this great leap forward was taken and the
site had been used as a burial ground even before the founding of the town itself. Making an
estimation that only one person was buried every year (a very low figure) the total of tombs would
still be 3.000(!) waiting to be excavated. No doubt there is still a lot to be revealed from the sand in
this old cemetery, where new finds come to surface regularly.
In 1901 the Italian archaeologist Barsanti made a scoop when he by coincidence practically
stumbled down into a vast underground gallery of rooms going out from a long corridor ending
with a grave chamber (see picture above).
Clay stoppers from storage jars revealed the owner's name - pharaoh Hotepsekhemwy, the first
king of the second dynasty.
Egyptologists now had an example that cutting stone and tunneling the bedrock was well advanced
at this early state of Egyptian history. A few decades later another gallery of similar shape was
found c. 150 meters to the east. Lots of remains from later times were found within it, but remaining
clues told that this was the tomb of pharaoh Nynetjer, the third king of the same dynasty. The tomb
of the ruler thought to have been in charge between these two - Raneb, hasn't been found yet, but
there is a fitting space between the found galleries that is suitable to contain this monument.
There is no trace of the tomb from the following king from dynasty two - Sened, who according to
Manetho had a long reign of well over 40 years. But 100 m north of Hotepsekhemwy's galleries is a
much bigger one with a length of 350 m and now within the enclosure wall of the later grave complex
of pharaoh Djoser. This, not so well examined, large gallery is most likely what is left of the tomb of
Sened. Unfortunately no structures above ground remains from these three underground tombs,
and we don't know if they had mastaba-like buildings or not.
Further reading about these kings can be found in the chapter of the dynasties 1-2. (Menu above).
Dynasty "0"
In these old times local chiefs ruled over different parts of the Nile Valley.
In Upper Egypt urban areas, "proto kingdoms", emerged around
places like Hierakonpolis, Nagada, and Abydos (This).
Knowledge about Lower Egypt from this time
is still awaiting to be developed
among Egyptologists
of today.
In the 1990s some astonishing finds were made at the old royal cemetery at Abydos. When ex-
cavating the area north of the tombs from the first dynasty and just before, a vast burial ground of
older date was found. The place has been called "Cemetery U" (picture below) and over a dozen
tombs of substance were dug out by the German Institute of Archaeology in Cairo (DAIK).
These new-found monuments were older than those from Cemetery B to the south, where pharaohs
from the first dynasty had their last resting places.
With a few exceptions the older tombs consisted of only one chamber and those with elabo- rated
structures like a couple of connecting store rooms, are probably made close to the first dynasty.
With one possible exception (see tomb J above and Scorpion I) there were no traces of names to
identify the buried by name, but in this early state of hieroglyphic writing it's possible that the
1) Copy from tomb 1549 at Tarkhan. Some see a resemblance to king Crocodile's seal. A
crocodile's head facing left on a line (standard?) is possible. Top sign hard to read.
2 and 3) Rock carvings from the desert east of Armant: square and a crescent with lines
(beams?). Possibly sign P on top and a hnt-sign at bottom. Pe Hor?, Pe Henet?
4) Painting from tomb of king Ka (dyn. I) from Abydos, copied by Petrie 1902. Looks like a boat
(?) with lines going from the hull. Shows no resemblance to any other sign.
5 Serek from tomb of king Qa (dynasty I) from Abydos, found in 1902. Some see the head of a
bird facing right in this uncertain fragmentary sign (see king Bird dynasty 1).
6 Archaeologist's drawing (Petrie Museum) said to be from Tarkhan tomb 315. The findings from
there have no such sign though, and it's possibly a misinterpretation.
7 Painted jar from Tarkhan, tomb 1702. The serek had a big upstanding object outside like #10.
The sign within has been read Hat Hor. Is it a club, scepter, spear or an arm ?
8 Serek from centre of a ceremonial palette with a common motif of dogs? with suckling puppies.
The grid has similarities to king Den's name written in the Abydos list 1300 BC.
9 Jar from Ezbet el-Tell. A line-sign (Narmer?). Circle outside like the sign of god Re.
Crocodile
This ruler is known only from a few remains, and especially an impression coming from a cylinder
seal (link above) found in the wealthy large tomb 414 at Tarkhan.
When it was excavated in 1912, regrettably not a single remain was found of the deceased him- self.
The motif on this remarkable impression is water waves with crocodiles, but unfortunately the
owner has not left a name to identify himself. There is something that might point out his pro-
venance though - in the seal is a standard depicted with a crocodile having two objects standing
on its back. This can be a hint that he was a ruler from the only nome (province) in the country with
this animal as its symbol (picture below right). It was the 6th nome of Upper Egypt, right at the upper
part of the "knee" of the Nile, today known as the "Quena Bend". The capital here was Iunet Tantere,
later to be Dendera.
In a short distance to the south is the old town of Coptos known for its early advanced culture with
monumentalstone statues, around 2,6 m in height, manufactured before the first dynasty. This
region has a strategic location, because from here go the paths between the Nile Valley and the Red
Sea. The road from today's Quift (Coptos), is called Wadi Hammamat, and coils through 120 km of
sterile desert mountains, but 5000 years ago conditions may have been different. A theory among
scientists is that cultural influences (like cylinder seals) possibly came to Egypt from Sumeria by
this route before the first dynasty. If this was the case, the leader of this region would surely have
been the first to observe all news coming from abroad, and maybe the local chief "Crocodile" was
that person.
When the proto-kingdoms slowly were formed in the early times the urban centers were
Hierakonpolis, Nagada and This (Thinis) and possibly leaving the "in between" Dendera
region more or less independent in the middle right by today's "Quena bend". (Kemp 1991, p. 34,
Manley 1996 p. 22). A fact is that this province and its capital is one of the few in Egypt to have a
long tradition of a crocodile cult and the age of the cemeteries goes way back beyond the first
dynasty. The chief ruling this stretch of land could thus make a mini-kingdom of his own and might
be an explanation to the elusive ruler which we for practical reasons call "Pharaoh Crocodile".
Another possible site is the Faiyum basin with its old veneration of the crocodile god Sobek and its
location next door to Tarkhan and the national capital to be (Memphis). But the standards of the
nomes in this region have never included a crocodile.
A tomb at Helwan east of Memphis has revealed an unique cylinder seal showing a crocodile and
an empty serek with the Horus falcon (picture above far left, colors not genuine). Its age has been
estimated to the period just prior to the unification and this can be King Crocodile showing himself
in the new cylinder style manner.
Also occurring is a male figure (the king himself?) with up-raised arms and two long-necked fantasy
animals (or possibly giraffes) flanking two trees. The latter motif is found on old cosmetic palettes
from before the unification. Crocodiles on the other hand, do not occur on these palettes where
several other types of animals (wild, domesticated and fantasy) often were depicted.
The long necked beasts possibly symbolize the two nations with the growing tree(s) being the fertile
Nile they both live in symbiosis with. Note also the crocodile's head and the object(?) upon it, and
compared to the feather from the nome standard far right. The German Egyptologist Werner Kaiser
has put forward the hypothesis that Crocodile might have been a local high official in the Tarkhan
region during the reign of king Narmer, whose name (in variations) also was found in this tomb.
His countryman Gunter Dreyer takes another view and interprets the mud-seal impression from the
Tarkhan tomb as a mark from a "real" king over some area simultaneously with the rulers from
Hierakonpolis in the south and in This downstream (north). He made his conclusion after studying
infrared photographs and other compara- tive objects. He also estimates king Crocodile's reign to
be contemporary to those of Narmer and Iryhor. Since no tomb of Crocodile has been found at
Abydos among the other early rulers buried there, he might have been an opponent to these kings.
If that's the case king Crocodile's tomb might still await to be found somewhere, possibly around
Dendera in his own province.
The fact that both Crocodile's and Narmer's sealing were found in the same Tarkhan tomb does not
have to be puzzling and plausible explanations can be made.
If the tomb belonged to a nome governor or someone else of high rank, and this is highly prob-
able, surely both Narmer and Crocodile would have paid tribute to the deceased by sending funeral
gifts. Sealings from both kings would in that case be present in the tomb, and exactly this is what
was found. Since Narmer seems to have been the most powerful of the two, it is likely that his gifts
were more in numbers, and just so was the case when the remains from the tomb were analysed.
The historical scenario here described is of course made up, but the physical details are all correct
and fit together. In other words: it's quite possible that something like this once happened and was
revealed 5000 years later when the 6 square meters of tomb 414 at Tarkhan was investigated in
1913.
It would take over 1.400 years before the crocodile became the insignia
and name of a king in Egypt again. A row of pharaohs took this animal to their hearts and titles
during the troublesome period of dynasty 13 at the end of the Middle Kingdom.
Scorpion I
In the early 1990s an elaborated tomb (right) marked with "J" was exca-
vated in Abydos (picture right). It was found in the oldest part of the burial
site at the so called Cemetery U 150 meters north of the ones from Narmer
and Aha. The construction was built of dried mud bricks and the walls were
rather thin compared to the monuments of the fol- lowers. The size (7,5 x 10
m) told that the owner had been a person of very great importance. The
original structure was the burial chamber in the upper right corner and nine
offering rooms connected to one an- other (and the grave chamber) by
narrow slits, probably symbolizing doors. The tomb was later enlarged with
two rooms built in two stages, at the south long the side. The date of this
extension is not known, but it was probably made close to in time, or even
just when the original monument was finished, and found too small to
contain all the funeral gifts.
The grave goods found within it were remarkable and a big surprise for the
excavators: images of scorpions in a royal fashion and lots of jars imported
from northern Palestine 1000 km to the north-east possibly to have contained
wine. Some were attached with small ivory tags depicting birds and other
animals and one obviously marked with the name of the town Bast (Greek:
Bubastis, see picture left). That town was situated in the mid-east delta in
Lower Egypt 550 km away at the northern end of the Nile Valley. Obviously
parts of the provisions for the owner came from there, stored in these imported
jars. The archaeologists working at the site were from the German
Archaeological Institute in Cairo (DAIK) under the super- vision of Gnther
Dreyer. He put forward the theory that this could be the tomb of a pharaoh he called Scorpion I, due
to the fact that his "name" or rather insignia had been found.
Another thing is that among several depictions and sculptures of a scorpion at the Main Deposit at
Hierakon- polis, nobody can tell if it's made for Scorpion 1 or 2.
Scorpion II
The biggest and most famous is on the other hand of good quality in the parts
remaining of a magnificent big mace head earlier mentioned. It's today
exhibited at the Ashmolean Museum in Oxford England.
His tomb has not been detected so far (year 2001) but there is a possibility
that his last resting place was in the four-chamber grave (B 50) just 30 meters
south-west of Narmer's in the old part of the royal cemetery at Abydos, or
identical to the tomb thought to be from his namesake number one. The B 50
monument is placed right in the center of the tombs from the pharaohs of the
first dynasty, but has regrettably not left a single shred of evidence to make
an identification of the owner.
Another possibility is that he was not buried in the area at all because he was
a ruler from Hierakonpolis further to the south, and not connected to kings
from Abydos (This). If so his tomb might still be hidden under the sand in the
Hierakonpolis area.
Other remains of Scorpion II are sparse and only a few names in sereks painted on pots can possibly
Iryhor
This ruler is the oldest known by name who is buried in the royal cemetery
of Abydos. He is believed to have reigned in around 3100 BC. The picture
right shows what's left of the two chambers from his tomb. The southern
one seems to have been extended in an irregular way with the original
measures left only in the part facing north. Only the substructure of sun
dried bricks remains and it's possible that no superstructure has ever
existed.
The site was axcavated in 1902 by the English
archaeologist Flinders Petrie and in the 1980s an
expedition from the German Archaeology Institute in
Cairo (DAIK) reexcavated the tombusing modern
methods.
New remnants came to light and the there were found
seal impressions and potsherds with Iryhor's
personal insignia. Parts of a bed and a fine ivory
fragment of a bed-foot made like a bull's leg were
also among the new interesting finds.
The big jar with the carved in falcon (picture left), was
unearthed in 1902 from chamber B 1, the supposed
place of king's body. Then in the 1980s it produced
an incised jar fragment and a astonishing eight ink
inscriptions and a seal impression, plus remains holding the names of
Narmer and Ka (JEA 1993). The amount of finds in such a small place was
unexpected and the fragments with Narmer's name means that the tomb was
opened at a later date (and restored?) and new offerings were placed within.
The reading of Iryhor's name is far from certain, and is interpreted by using
the word for falcon god (Hor) who sits upon a sign for mouth (iry). Petrie
interpreted the sign as Ro. No other ruler had the name of the falcon (the icon of the king himself)
as an integrated part of his name, but it works well as an identification for this ancient leader. His
place in the sequence of reign was given after king Ka by Petrie, despite the fact that this king had
his name within a serek. He made the conclusion on mainly three facts:
1) The big jar with the name (above left) is of a later type that did not occur in the tomb of Ka.
2) The seal with the falcon and the mouth was very alike those of Narmer and Aha and not at all like
Ka's more simple one.
3) The seal impression (of clay) was of yellow marl like the ones made in later times, but Ka's was
of black mud.
Some Egyptologists don't recognize him as a real "king" at all mainly because of the absence of a
Ka
King Ka ruled a generation prior to dynasty I, and was buried in a double tomb
at Abydos. where he is considered to have preceded king Narmer as king of This.
This conclusion is based upon analysis of the ceramics and other offerings from
his grave and its building style and position in the cemetery. Its feature (picture
left) was very alike his supposed predecessor's king Iryhor both in position and
shape, with two chambers beside each other in a "row" with pointing short sides
and a gap between of a couple of meters. When it was excavated in 1902 lots of
remains with the king's name came to light and the identification is thus clear.
He is a well-attested king and his remnants have been
found as far north as the northeast delta in Lower Egypt
plus Helwan opposite Memphis and Tarkhan at the level
of the Faiyum basin. Findings connected to him has not
been found south of Abydos (the area of the old capital
of This). This indicates that he had no relationship to the
(earlier?) rulers from Hierakonpolis. Among the finds
from his tomb were several potsherds found with his
"name", two raised arms, a sign later to mean "soul" and pronounced "ka".
He had it written within a "serek", thought to be a depiction of the facade of
the royal palace (picture right). He was the first pharaoh to adopt this sign
and the falcon on its top, in this illustration (picture right) accompanied with
the plant symbolizing Upper Egypt. Of the two chambers he is likely to have
been buried in southern (B7) and the other (B9) was for offerings and
supplies. He could possibly have been the father of Narmer, whose tomb
was built in a similar style and size, and placed just 30 meters away. A small
very realistic ivory statuette showing an anonymous old king might be a portrait of king Ka, but this
is pure guesswork.
Menes
This pharaoh is the legendary king that came from the town of This (Tinis) in Upper Egypt and took
over Lower Egypt (the North) by force. He then became the first king over the whole country and
founded a new capital for the united Egypt - Memphis (egy. Menefer), just where the two states
Many scholars have tried to point out who he was and the candidates have mostly been Narmer and
Aha. Narmer because he portrayed himself as the ruler of both Upper and Lower Egypt on his
famous green palette found within the temple area of the town of Hierakonpolis in Upper Egypt (as
seen above in the chapter "Historical Records").
King Aha, likely Narmer's son, on the other hand, was the first pharaoh who had monuments of
substance over the whole country, and his large tomb constructions (with buried retainers for the
first time) were in dimensions that far overshadowed his predecessors. He has also left a written
sign interpreted by some as the word "men" (meaning: "established") written beside his ordinary
name at one occasion. This once made him the favorite to be "Menes from Thinis" until the last
decade of the 1900s when the old royal tombs in Abydos were re-excavated. Then came to light two
remarkable seal impressions from the tombs of Den and Qaa, the fifth and eighth ruler of the first
dynasty. The motif was a line of kings in a successive order, and both had Narmer as the founder
of the first dynasty, followed by Aha. Analyzing the Egyptian tradition it looks like the deeds of
Menes might be an amalgam of components from several chiefs and legends, and thus it may not
be fruitful to identify him with a single historical person, though Narmer might have been the one
to finished the job by uniting the to kingdoms.
A linguistic possibility for Narmer being Menes is that the two sound elements Nar and Mer might
have been read in reverse order (common in later Egyptian history), making: Mernar, which gives a
similarity to the sounds of Mena - Meni.
The Earliest Cultures South and North History Begins The 42 provinces
Origin of the Egyptians Eye Makeup Sumerian Connection Hieroglyphs
Records Early Kings The Unification The Royal Cemetery Pharaoh's titles
The first signs of human activity in the area which today is Egypt, dates
back around 500,000 years. Pebbles and stone axes from the Abu
Simbel region in the far south have been estimated to be of this age.
The majority of the stone age finds are 90.000 to 250.000 years old and
the materials are mostly the stones quartzite and basalt. These
remnants are surely from the dawn of man and not from our own clever
and imaginetive sort Homo Sapiens Sapiens.
The first fragments of "real" humans and an organized society are from
Qadan (250 km south of Aswan) and date back to circa 13.000 to 9.000
BC. and have the first cemeteries with ritual burials.
In the 1890s some remarkable finds were made at the old town of Nekhen, called Hierakonpolis
(Falcon City) by the Greeks. It was situated 140 km south of todays Luxor (yesterday's Thebes) and
placed upon a rocky plateau 400 m out in the flood plain from the western bank of the Nile, which
made it easy to defend during the flooding season when it was surrounded by water. The
foundations and remains of a royal palace told that this was the place where the earliest kings had
resided. Under the ground outside the temple was a cache containing lots of remains from the
earliest pharaohs, and it was obviously brought her for safe keeping from the cemetery at Abydos
up north and possibly some other royal burial ground not yet found. Among the finds were several
figures of clay, ceramics, ivory, stone and bone (picture below) and some types (possibly local)
were never to be seen again in Egyptian art after the start of the first dynasty.
Some small figures made of ivory depicted a god with a broad beard and sometimes a helmet like
cap on his head. He might be the god of fertility - Min, at least in the version with a bald head (see
"Nagada" by the picture atop). If the female figurines are early prototypes for later goddesses is not
known, but the sleeve-less cloak around one of them (above) is very unusual. (See the link "old
king" in the text of king Ka below).
Extensive investigations starting in 2002 have revealed a lot about this oldest royal temple in Egypt,
the Hierakonpolis center. It went through at least three big changes (enlargements) during the time
prior to the union of the countries in around 3.200 BC. In the cemetery of the elite has been found
quite elaborated tombs with offerings dating back as long as 3.700 BC. This unex-pected fact gives
The ancient Egyptians were in general slim hipped with rather broad shoulders and oval faces was
in majority. They depicted themselves with long straight noses from the earliest times through
portraits made in later periods. (Pictures right are from 1.500 and 3.200 BC).
The women hardly never got plump and had no tendency to a large behind like their black sisters
further south did. Their hair color was usually black to dark brown.
More light skinned individuals were present especially in the coastal area west of the Nile delta
among the Libyan tribes (see below).
Considering the homogeneity of the people a fair assumption is that most of the Egyptians have
entered the Nile Valley from the north (and from the now gone savannas west of the river) and
spread to the Red Sea in the east. In the south they stopped at the cataract of Aswan, where the
fruitful shores of mud ended and were replaced by cliffs. This point was for thousands of years the
natural lower border of Egypt, separating them from the black inhabitants further south by a vast
stretch of wasteland.
The first "cultural" remains found are, at the earliest, from around 13,000 BC. These traces are too
few for making conclusions about those who left them. When the annual floods with its fertilizing
mud started grass began to grow by the shores and hunters had possibility to get prey, and this did
not begin to an extent until after the latest Ice Age as recent as around 8,000 BC.
The western part of today's Egypt is just the sterile Sahara desert. Archaeology has shown that
long before and during the Later Stone Age (neoliticum, beginning around 6.000 B.C.) people lived
here as hunters and had a type of culture which to a big part was very similar to the one by the Nile
(Hoffman: Egypt Before the Pharaohs" 1979).
Furthermore, ancient rock art in the mountains show hunters, pray and dometicated ani- mals, but
the lack of dwelling and tombs makes it all difficult to date the single remains. Scholars estimate
within a span of 10.000 to 3.000 years BC. Nontheless this clearly indicates that this region which
then was a savannah, provided the Nile Valley with immigrants and possibly vice versa. As late as
during the Old Kingdom these so called "sand dwellers" (Egyptian name) were many enough to
disurb the state by the Nile which had to take military actions against them bringing back prisoners
and live stock to Egypt.
In the ealiest days the people by the Nile were hunters too, but had additional skills compared to
their neighbors in the deserts. They were used to water and used boats and rafts, could catch fowl,
fish and hunted game like crocodiles and hippos.
In around 5,000 B.C. agriculture came to the Nile Valley and the population increased considerably.
By this time the region had rain falls making the desert areas now flanking the river a grass land
feeding animals like buffaloes, giraffes, gazelles, and present were also the feline predators lions
and cheetas. Then the climate constantly got drier and at the beginning of dynastic times most of
the big grass eaters were extinct. By 2,000 years BC rain falls did appear just occasion-ally and the
nomads in the western savannas were the first ones to abandon their hunting grounds. Activities
(like small scale agriculture) was from now on possible only in the big oases. To maintain the food
supply (crops) the Egyptians had to store and transport water from the river and this could only be
done through canal- and dam building in a huge scale. An firm organization was needed to realize
this and the centralized power was established since the original tribe areas and their chiefs were
inadequate in size to perform such a great task themselves.
The Eastern Mountains towards the Red Sea probably never had any vast grass areas like the
western regions did. Living conditions here were more suitable for small live stock breeding with
animals like goats and sheep. Pictorial remains from the inhabitants are remarkably many, and new
ones are found by hundreds every year today (2007). These pictures have a significant and common
motif which is lacking in the mountains west of the Nile - boats.
This area seems to have been fairly occupied at least until the end of the Old Kingdom. Thereafter
the mountaineers probably got fewer and are not mentioned specifically in hieroglyphic texts any
more. The Egyptian name meaning "easterners" (see text by the picture above) was used also to
designate peoples coming from Asia, mostly those from the Middle East region.
The "real" Egyptians were the farmers by the Nile with their high and developed culture, and they
always considered themselves a separate people from their close neighbors though we can assume
that they shared the same language. These relatives disturbed the Egyptian trade routs through
robbery etc. and this was the main reason for hostility between these cousins.
The Egyptian army was constantly kept alert by maintaining security for their export and import
passing these areas. The Egyptian (slightly degrading) name for inhabitants here was "mountain
dwellers" an analogue to the people in Sahara westbound being called "sand dwellers".
The scene on a knife handle mentioned above shows two types of boats. The ones with a high
prows are believed to be from the northern delta - Lower Egypt - and made of papyrus. The
Egyptians living there called their country "Ta-mehu", the land of the papyrus.
The others boats have their origin in southern - Upper Egypt - "Ta-schema", the land of the reed,
and seem to be partly made of wood. The cabins are different too as shown in the "painted grave"
from Hierakonpolis (see picture in chapter "The historical records" below).
The high prowed boats also occur in Sumeria but there is no evidence that they were brought to the
Nile Valley by invaders or even was a cultural import for that matter, because the reed/papyrus
material simply make this the only practical way of constructing such a boat.
In the mountains in the East Desert from the possible path of the "invaders" a large
number of stone carvings have been found, where boats (often big ones) play a leading
roll. It is obvious that this vehicle played a major part in Egyptian society already in
prehistoric times but there is no evidence that these vessels were for sailing on the
high seas, and the more modest strip of water called the Nile (during the inundation
up to 60 km across) would have been enough.
At the beginning of the 1900's archaeologists examined the skeletal remains of the
earliest graves and found that the remains of the ruling class" indicated that they might
have been of heavier stature than the Egyptians in general. This was the ground for
Cylinder seal, the belief that these had come from outside the country.
cultural import
Evidence of cultural influence from Sumeria before the unification is proven, but
from Sumeria
genetic influence to a notable extent is not.
The newcomers were believed to have brought a falcon god into Egypt and were called after him -
"The followers of Horus". The physical statures of the oldest kings are not known, but remains and
depictions of those from dynasties 0-4 tell that some were heavy-built with broad faces, but
variations within the families were frequent.
The most significant influence from Sumeria was the facade of the royal palace. This was an insignia
for the king, depicted in a stylized way and called a "serek". It came into use before dynasty 1, as
did the new style of mud brick masonry in northern Egypt used in the mastaba-tombs.
<="" a="">
Hieroglyphs - and Egyptian writing
A very early attempt to descript hieroglyphs was made during the 9th and 10th century. Then an
Arab speaking writer and alchemist named Ibn Wahshiyah is said to have had some progress in
finding Coptic words and sounds from hieroglyphic texts. His manuscripts were translated into
English and published in London in 1806 but have never been referred to by scholars.
Since modern Egyptology started at the end of the 1800s, additional stones has constantly been
added to the building of the Egyptian language and have been put in their proper floor, due to the
fact that many changes were made during its long life of at least 3,500 years.
<="" a="">
The historical records
During the 1990s old sites of archaeological interest were dug up again after 100 years, and new
methods brought a fresh light to old conclusions made by scholars of yesterday. We have reason
to believe that prior to the unification progress in various sectors of society like agriculture,
breeding of cattle, metalwork, etc was the same in the delta as in the valley itself. Unfortunately
knowledge of the north is practically nothing from this period, but from the south the development
can be well observed through the advances of modern archaeology. The first areas with centralized
power, "mini kingdoms", were placed around the big "knee" of the Nile, where the water strikes
hard rocks of granite and has to make a right (eastern) turn. These main areas were at This (north
of Abydos), Nagada and above all Hierakonpolis 40 km south of today's Luxor. (See map at top of
page).
At Hierakonpolis a huge fortified area with a temple was dug up in the 1890s. Luckily many objects
from the oldest times to the sixth dynasty were found in a cache called "the Main Deposit" in the
temple yard. The town was situated on an island in the Nile and thus easy to protect, because armed
struggle for power was significant for this time, at least from evidence in remains like grave goods
By the advent of the 12th dynasty in around 2 000 BC the ruler had adopted no
less then five titles in his presentation on monuments and in writings.
The oldest of them was the so called "Horus Name" which is attested for as far
back as when writing began and it was from the beginning connected to the
falcon god Hor (Greek: Horus) which stood for the king himself as a person. The
bird was usually put atop of a rectangular box (a so called serek seen in the
picture left) which symbolized the royal palace and its fancy mud brick facade,
and gates, shown in stripes and squares at the bottom. The picture left shows
the Horus name of king Qaa of the first dynasty.
The well known name "Pharaoh" is a late Greek corruption of two Egyptian
words meaning - great house. From the Greek period (200s BC) and onwards it
was used in writing, just with phonetic hieroglyphs and letters without having a
symbol of its own, and in a context like today's words "His Majesty".
The Horus name
The Nomen was given to the king to be when he was born, and was thus realy a
personal name by which he was called by his family members. From dynasty four
the prefix "Son of Re" was added by a goose (son of) and
the solar disk for Re. It was written within a cartouche
from the third dynasty and onwards. Sometimes the
words "The Good God" could be written just before the
name to put a divine touch to the name of the human
The Son of Re person who could be called Senwosret, Seti or
Amenemhet. The picture right shows this type of personal name from dynasty six, simply saying -
Pepi son of Re.
The question over the years has been if tradition is right about a single military attack from the
south invading the north, and the answer is most likely - it's not. Narmer isn't the only king who
showed himself as the winner smiting enemies and wearing both crowns, because so did Scorpion.
And if Menes wasn't identical with any of those, we have three kings as the presumed founders of
dynasty number one. The theory that's most likely is that it took a long time - maybe generations,
to make Egypt one, and thus we have a possible founder who was the first to rule over the whole
Nile valley. King Aha (see dynasty 1) is a strong candidate for this post since he is the first one to
be present with substantial monuments in both parts of the country.
The only one of these records that was made to give a correct version of the history, is the list of
Manetho. The others were all made for different purposes, not entirely known.
The Palermo and Cairo stones are possibly in a class all by themselves, and so is the Canon of
Turin, written on papyrus. The lists from Karnak and Abydos are both parts of temple decora-tions
and obviously some kings are deliberately omitted for being either too insignificant or politically
incorrect in some way.
The Sakkara list on the other hand, is the only "private" record of substance, coming from a tomb
of a caretaker of cults for dead kings.
By combining these records scholars have got a rather good picture of the order of kings, but the
time span for the earliest dynasties and the order of some rulers (from dynasties 2 and 3) is still a
subject of discussion.
The Palermo stone was a part of a bigger stone slab on which the Egyptians recorded the events
for each year for the earliest kings, and the present one during its making - the fifth dynasty. In the
top row kings from before the unification are noted and if they have existed they are the oldest
persons on earth recorded by their names. In this case the kings from Lower Egypt are those who
have been saved for later times, and in a another similar stone (more damaged) called the Cairo
stone, the rulers from Upper Egypt are depicted but the part with their names is missing. Notable is
that these stones are the oldest records of its kind, and the recording was made at least 600 years
after the unification in around 3.200 BC by the mythical king Menes.
This may seem a long time, but Manetho who made his work nearly 3.000 years after Menes, has
been proven to be correct by archaeology in many cases where other sources have failed or said
otherwise. This shows that the Egyptians kept records of their history, but they were not so keen
on publishing it. Manetho was probably given the task by the king himself, probably one of the two
first in line by the name Ptolmaios. They were of Greek decent and had another view of history and
were not bound to Egyptian traditions. Therefor we can assume (hope) that Manetho (though he
was an Egyptian himself) had a more neutral and "scientific" approach and didn't omit insignificant
and politically "incorrect" rulers from the past that we know was common. His original writings are
regrettably lost, but vital parts have survived through rewritten list made by others which has
effected the content in a negative way. The most quoted of them is a Roman Christian historian
called Africanus who lived in the 3rd century AD.
The Unification
About seven rulers from the second dynasty are without monuments at Abydos, and are most likely
buried in Sakkara. From the third dynasty and onwards the Abydos cemetery wasn't used for royal
burials.
Another fact is that the tombs in the south were all considerably smaller and cruder than those in
the north. But inscribed remains with the names of the kings and side burials (of retainers) were
more frequent in the south, where also half a dozen large enclosed areas were built, obviously for
ceremonies in the cults of the dead pharaohs. The tombs at Abydos were irre-gular rectangular
constructions, built on sand and gravel nearly two kilometers from the Nile. They were obviously
built to be under ground, perhaps with a low wall on the surface imitating the form of the house the
king had resided in during his reign. In Memphis on the other hand, they were fancy rectangular
mud brick mastabas in a northern fashion with slightly sloping walls above ground, and with time
with larger underground chambers hewn down into the bedrock. They stood right on the high
escarpment overlooking the Nile Valley and the capital below and some of them were decorated
with symmetrical patterns painted in bright colors.
The style with sloping walls and recesses (see picture below) was an influence from the Sumerian
culture in Mesopotamia, and went out of fashion at the end of the second dynasty. By that time the
royal court and the administration had moved permanently to Memphis and the southern burial
ground was abandoned for good.
When looking at the style of tombs from royalties and high officials it's not difficult to conclude that
they were reflections of their residences during their earthly life. All the rooms filled with gifts and
all kinds of supplies for the next life, were in life various store rooms for the big household. The
dead shouldn't miss anything from his former life and therefore he also had his bathroom and
lavatory. The chamber with his mummy was of course his bedroom where he now could sleep for
eternal times. As to his harem and other employees in housekeeping it's clear that parts of the staff
of the first kings were sacrificed and followed their master into the next world, but this tradition
disappeared rather quickly. During the first dynasty lots of large mastaba graves were built in
Sakkara, but their contents (in some unique cases undisturbed for nearly 5.000 years) do not point
out for sure that the monument was a tomb for a king. Names of high officials and kings have been
found, and if the owners were officials, the tombs were much bigger and more elaborated than those
of the kings in Abydos. It doesn't seem logical to us, but we don't know the Egyptians' reflections
about it, so this issue has to be unanswered for the time being.
When the first dynasty kings built their tombs in Abydos, things were also happening in the
capital Memphis at the burial ground in Sakkara. On the high desert edge overlooking the capital
and the fertile valley, about 20 large mastabas were built during the c. 175 years of the first dynasty.
The size, type and technical improvements shown in these have no counterparts in Abydos, and
some archaeologists, among them the one the who dug out most of them, thought that these were
the tombs where the kings had been buried. Today the opinion is different due to the fact that more
and more of old monuments (except royal tombs) have been uncovered in Abydos such as large
enclosed areas with thick brick walls and a dozen boat graves from the oldest dynasties.
Nevertheless the Sakkara tombs shows astonishing improvements as the tombs through the years
got an increasing part under ground in the bedrock. Furthermore we have the fact that some
monuments had side burials for servants. The one with the most (dated to the reign of Djer) had 62.
During the reign of Ka the first self supporting vault ever known in the history of architecture was
built.
The general answer to the question who were the owners of these great tombs is: high officials. For
the first and last time in Egyptian history the royal court had been overshadowed in tomb prosperity
by bureaucrats, if this is the right answer. Royal power thus did not gain land from the high officials
in the first 150 years of the existence of the united Egyptian state. It's interesting to make a
comparison between monuments from the first king Aha. The difference between one of his three
separate chambers that made his monument in Abydos, and a mastaba from Memphis' cemetery.
Technical advances
During the second dynasty the Egyptians had performed with brilliant skill in working in hard stone.
The statue of Khasekhemwy from dynasty two is so far the best example of this achievement, with
shaped and polished surfaces in hard stone. On the east bank of the Nile opposite Sakkara, dozens
of graves from wealthy non-royal inhabitants of Memphis were buried in tombs where the
substructures were built of large blocks of fine shaped stones. Notable is that in these days the
hardest metal known by the Egyptians was copper and at this time bronze came into use (a bowl
from Khasekhemwy is known) and to cut out the bedrock they had to use implements made of hard
stone (dolerite). This was the only way they could work for a thousand years(!) when finally tools
made of the new hard metal - iron, came into use.
Noticing the quality of these tombs of lower officials, archaeologists had reason to believe that the
three first kings of the second dynasty whose tombs were not to be found at the cemetery in Abydos
- Raneb, Nynetjer and Hetepsekhemwy had their last resting places hidden somewhere under the
sand in Sakkara, and finds from the beginning of the twentieth century seem to con- firm this
suggestion. There the building of tombs had taken a new big step downwards under ground, and
the developing of new technique in cutting stone and tunneling in the bedrock made it possible to
elaborate the final resting places of the kings. A new era had begun and the Egyptians were able to
master the hardest of stones to make anything from small statuettes to huge monuments.
It was in Sakkara, the necropolis of the capital Memphis this great leap forward was taken and the
site had been used as a burial ground even before the founding of the town itself. Making an
estimation that only one person was buried every year (a very low figure) the total of tombs would
still be 3.000(!) waiting to be excavated. No doubt there is still a lot to be revealed from the sand in
this old cemetery, where new finds come to surface regularly.
In 1901 the Italian archaeologist Barsanti made a scoop when he by coincidence practically
stumbled down into a vast underground gallery of rooms going out from a long corridor ending
with a grave chamber (see picture above).
Clay stoppers from storage jars revealed the owner's name - pharaoh Hotepsekhemwy, the first
king of the second dynasty.
Egyptologists now had an example that cutting stone and tunneling the bedrock was well advanced
at this early state of Egyptian history. A few decades later another gallery of similar shape was
found c. 150 meters to the east. Lots of remains from later times were found within it, but remaining
clues told that this was the tomb of pharaoh Nynetjer, the third king of the same dynasty. The tomb
of the ruler thought to have been in charge between these two - Raneb, hasn't been found yet, but
there is a fitting space between the found galleries that is suitable to contain this monument.
There is no trace of the tomb from the following king from dynasty two - Sened, who according to
Manetho had a long reign of well over 40 years. But 100 m north of Hotepsekhemwy's galleries is a
much bigger one with a length of 350 m and now within the enclosure wall of the later grave complex
of pharaoh Djoser. This, not so well examined, large gallery is most likely what is left of the tomb of
Sened. Unfortunately no structures above ground remains from these three underground tombs,
and we don't know if they had mastaba-like buildings or not.
Further reading about these kings can be found in the chapter of the dynasties 1-2. (Menu above).
Dynasty "0"
In these old times local chiefs ruled over different parts of the Nile Valley.
In Upper Egypt urban areas, "proto kingdoms", emerged around
places like Hierakonpolis, Nagada, and Abydos (This).
Knowledge about Lower Egypt from this time
is still awaiting to be developed
among Egyptologists
of today.
In the 1990s some astonishing finds were made at the old royal cemetery at Abydos. When ex-
cavating the area north of the tombs from the first dynasty and just before, a vast burial ground of
older date was found. The place has been called "Cemetery U" (picture below) and over a dozen
tombs of substance were dug out by the German Institute of Archaeology in Cairo (DAIK).
These new-found monuments were older than those from Cemetery B to the south, where pharaohs
from the first dynasty had their last resting places.
With a few exceptions the older tombs consisted of only one chamber and those with elabo- rated
structures like a couple of connecting store rooms, are probably made close to the first dynasty.
With one possible exception (see tomb J above and Scorpion I) there were no traces of names to
identify the buried by name, but in this early state of hieroglyphic writing it's possible that the
1) Copy from tomb 1549 at Tarkhan. Some see a resemblance to king Crocodile's seal. A
crocodile's head facing left on a line (standard?) is possible. Top sign hard to read.
2 and 3) Rock carvings from the desert east of Armant: square and a crescent with lines
(beams?). Possibly sign P on top and a hnt-sign at bottom. Pe Hor?, Pe Henet?
4) Painting from tomb of king Ka (dyn. I) from Abydos, copied by Petrie 1902. Looks like a boat
(?) with lines going from the hull. Shows no resemblance to any other sign.
5 Serek from tomb of king Qa (dynasty I) from Abydos, found in 1902. Some see the head of a
bird facing right in this uncertain fragmentary sign (see king Bird dynasty 1).
6 Archaeologist's drawing (Petrie Museum) said to be from Tarkhan tomb 315. The findings from
there have no such sign though, and it's possibly a misinterpretation.
7 Painted jar from Tarkhan, tomb 1702. The serek had a big upstanding object outside like #10.
The sign within has been read Hat Hor. Is it a club, scepter, spear or an arm ?
8 Serek from centre of a ceremonial palette with a common motif of dogs? with suckling puppies.
The grid has similarities to king Den's name written in the Abydos list 1300 BC.
9 Jar from Ezbet el-Tell. A line-sign (Narmer?). Circle outside like the sign of god Re.
Crocodile
This ruler is known only from a few remains, and especially an impression coming from a cylinder
seal (link above) found in the wealthy large tomb 414 at Tarkhan.
When it was excavated in 1912, regrettably not a single remain was found of the deceased him- self.
The motif on this remarkable impression is water waves with crocodiles, but unfortunately the
owner has not left a name to identify himself. There is something that might point out his pro-
venance though - in the seal is a standard depicted with a crocodile having two objects standing
on its back. This can be a hint that he was a ruler from the only nome (province) in the country with
this animal as its symbol (picture below right). It was the 6th nome of Upper Egypt, right at the upper
part of the "knee" of the Nile, today known as the "Quena Bend". The capital here was Iunet Tantere,
later to be Dendera.
In a short distance to the south is the old town of Coptos known for its early advanced culture with
monumentalstone statues, around 2,6 m in height, manufactured before the first dynasty. This
region has a strategic location, because from here go the paths between the Nile Valley and the Red
Sea. The road from today's Quift (Coptos), is called Wadi Hammamat, and coils through 120 km of
sterile desert mountains, but 5000 years ago conditions may have been different. A theory among
scientists is that cultural influences (like cylinder seals) possibly came to Egypt from Sumeria by
this route before the first dynasty. If this was the case, the leader of this region would surely have
been the first to observe all news coming from abroad, and maybe the local chief "Crocodile" was
that person.
When the proto-kingdoms slowly were formed in the early times the urban centers were
Hierakonpolis, Nagada and This (Thinis) and possibly leaving the "in between" Dendera
region more or less independent in the middle right by today's "Quena bend". (Kemp 1991, p. 34,
Manley 1996 p. 22). A fact is that this province and its capital is one of the few in Egypt to have a
long tradition of a crocodile cult and the age of the cemeteries goes way back beyond the first
dynasty. The chief ruling this stretch of land could thus make a mini-kingdom of his own and might
be an explanation to the elusive ruler which we for practical reasons call "Pharaoh Crocodile".
Another possible site is the Faiyum basin with its old veneration of the crocodile god Sobek and its
location next door to Tarkhan and the national capital to be (Memphis). But the standards of the
nomes in this region have never included a crocodile.
A tomb at Helwan east of Memphis has revealed an unique cylinder seal showing a crocodile and
an empty serek with the Horus falcon (picture above far left, colors not genuine). Its age has been
estimated to the period just prior to the unification and this can be King Crocodile showing himself
in the new cylinder style manner.
Also occurring is a male figure (the king himself?) with up-raised arms and two long-necked fantasy
animals (or possibly giraffes) flanking two trees. The latter motif is found on old cosmetic palettes
from before the unification. Crocodiles on the other hand, do not occur on these palettes where
several other types of animals (wild, domesticated and fantasy) often were depicted.
The long necked beasts possibly symbolize the two nations with the growing tree(s) being the fertile
Nile they both live in symbiosis with. Note also the crocodile's head and the object(?) upon it, and
compared to the feather from the nome standard far right. The German Egyptologist Werner Kaiser
has put forward the hypothesis that Crocodile might have been a local high official in the Tarkhan
region during the reign of king Narmer, whose name (in variations) also was found in this tomb.
His countryman Gunter Dreyer takes another view and interprets the mud-seal impression from the
Tarkhan tomb as a mark from a "real" king over some area simultaneously with the rulers from
Hierakonpolis in the south and in This downstream (north). He made his conclusion after studying
infrared photographs and other compara- tive objects. He also estimates king Crocodile's reign to
be contemporary to those of Narmer and Iryhor. Since no tomb of Crocodile has been found at
Abydos among the other early rulers buried there, he might have been an opponent to these kings.
If that's the case king Crocodile's tomb might still await to be found somewhere, possibly around
Dendera in his own province.
The fact that both Crocodile's and Narmer's sealing were found in the same Tarkhan tomb does not
have to be puzzling and plausible explanations can be made.
If the tomb belonged to a nome governor or someone else of high rank, and this is highly prob-
able, surely both Narmer and Crocodile would have paid tribute to the deceased by sending funeral
gifts. Sealings from both kings would in that case be present in the tomb, and exactly this is what
was found. Since Narmer seems to have been the most powerful of the two, it is likely that his gifts
were more in numbers, and just so was the case when the remains from the tomb were analysed.
The historical scenario here described is of course made up, but the physical details are all correct
and fit together. In other words: it's quite possible that something like this once happened and was
revealed 5000 years later when the 6 square meters of tomb 414 at Tarkhan was investigated in
1913.
It would take over 1.400 years before the crocodile became the insignia
and name of a king in Egypt again. A row of pharaohs took this animal to their hearts and titles
during the troublesome period of dynasty 13 at the end of the Middle Kingdom.
Scorpion I
In the early 1990s an elaborated tomb (right) marked with "J" was exca-
vated in Abydos (picture right). It was found in the oldest part of the burial
site at the so called Cemetery U 150 meters north of the ones from Narmer
and Aha. The construction was built of dried mud bricks and the walls were
rather thin compared to the monuments of the fol- lowers. The size (7,5 x 10
m) told that the owner had been a person of very great importance. The
original structure was the burial chamber in the upper right corner and nine
offering rooms connected to one an- other (and the grave chamber) by
narrow slits, probably symbolizing doors. The tomb was later enlarged with
two rooms built in two stages, at the south long the side. The date of this
extension is not known, but it was probably made close to in time, or even
just when the original monument was finished, and found too small to
contain all the funeral gifts.
The grave goods found within it were remarkable and a big surprise for the
excavators: images of scorpions in a royal fashion and lots of jars imported
from northern Palestine 1000 km to the north-east possibly to have contained
wine. Some were attached with small ivory tags depicting birds and other
animals and one obviously marked with the name of the town Bast (Greek:
Bubastis, see picture left). That town was situated in the mid-east delta in
Lower Egypt 550 km away at the northern end of the Nile Valley. Obviously
parts of the provisions for the owner came from there, stored in these imported
jars. The archaeologists working at the site were from the German
Archaeological Institute in Cairo (DAIK) under the super- vision of Gnther
Dreyer. He put forward the theory that this could be the tomb of a pharaoh he called Scorpion I, due
to the fact that his "name" or rather insignia had been found.
Another thing is that among several depictions and sculptures of a scorpion at the Main Deposit at
Hierakon- polis, nobody can tell if it's made for Scorpion 1 or 2.
Scorpion II
The biggest and most famous is on the other hand of good quality in the parts
remaining of a magnificent big mace head earlier mentioned. It's today
exhibited at the Ashmolean Museum in Oxford England.
His tomb has not been detected so far (year 2001) but there is a possibility
that his last resting place was in the four-chamber grave (B 50) just 30 meters
south-west of Narmer's in the old part of the royal cemetery at Abydos, or
identical to the tomb thought to be from his namesake number one. The B 50
monument is placed right in the center of the tombs from the pharaohs of the
first dynasty, but has regrettably not left a single shred of evidence to make
an identification of the owner.
Another possibility is that he was not buried in the area at all because he was
a ruler from Hierakonpolis further to the south, and not connected to kings
from Abydos (This). If so his tomb might still be hidden under the sand in the
Hierakonpolis area.
Other remains of Scorpion II are sparse and only a few names in sereks painted on pots can possibly
Iryhor
This ruler is the oldest known by name who is buried in the royal cemetery
of Abydos. He is believed to have reigned in around 3100 BC. The picture
right shows what's left of the two chambers from his tomb. The southern
one seems to have been extended in an irregular way with the original
measures left only in the part facing north. Only the substructure of sun
dried bricks remains and it's possible that no superstructure has ever
existed.
The site was axcavated in 1902 by the English
archaeologist Flinders Petrie and in the 1980s an
expedition from the German Archaeology Institute in
Cairo (DAIK) reexcavated the tombusing modern
methods.
New remnants came to light and the there were found
seal impressions and potsherds with Iryhor's
personal insignia. Parts of a bed and a fine ivory
fragment of a bed-foot made like a bull's leg were
also among the new interesting finds.
The big jar with the carved in falcon (picture left), was
unearthed in 1902 from chamber B 1, the supposed
place of king's body. Then in the 1980s it produced
an incised jar fragment and a astonishing eight ink
inscriptions and a seal impression, plus remains holding the names of
Narmer and Ka (JEA 1993). The amount of finds in such a small place was
unexpected and the fragments with Narmer's name means that the tomb was
opened at a later date (and restored?) and new offerings were placed within.
The reading of Iryhor's name is far from certain, and is interpreted by using
the word for falcon god (Hor) who sits upon a sign for mouth (iry). Petrie
interpreted the sign as Ro. No other ruler had the name of the falcon (the icon of the king himself)
as an integrated part of his name, but it works well as an identification for this ancient leader. His
place in the sequence of reign was given after king Ka by Petrie, despite the fact that this king had
his name within a serek. He made the conclusion on mainly three facts:
1) The big jar with the name (above left) is of a later type that did not occur in the tomb of Ka.
2) The seal with the falcon and the mouth was very alike those of Narmer and Aha and not at all like
Ka's more simple one.
3) The seal impression (of clay) was of yellow marl like the ones made in later times, but Ka's was
of black mud.
Some Egyptologists don't recognize him as a real "king" at all mainly because of the absence of a
Ka
King Ka ruled a generation prior to dynasty I, and was buried in a double tomb
at Abydos. where he is considered to have preceded king Narmer as king of This.
This conclusion is based upon analysis of the ceramics and other offerings from
his grave and its building style and position in the cemetery. Its feature (picture
left) was very alike his supposed predecessor's king Iryhor both in position and
shape, with two chambers beside each other in a "row" with pointing short sides
and a gap between of a couple of meters. When it was excavated in 1902 lots of
remains with the king's name came to light and the identification is thus clear.
He is a well-attested king and his remnants have been
found as far north as the northeast delta in Lower Egypt
plus Helwan opposite Memphis and Tarkhan at the level
of the Faiyum basin. Findings connected to him has not
been found south of Abydos (the area of the old capital
of This). This indicates that he had no relationship to the
(earlier?) rulers from Hierakonpolis. Among the finds
from his tomb were several potsherds found with his
"name", two raised arms, a sign later to mean "soul" and pronounced "ka".
He had it written within a "serek", thought to be a depiction of the facade of
the royal palace (picture right). He was the first pharaoh to adopt this sign
and the falcon on its top, in this illustration (picture right) accompanied with
the plant symbolizing Upper Egypt. Of the two chambers he is likely to have
been buried in southern (B7) and the other (B9) was for offerings and
supplies. He could possibly have been the father of Narmer, whose tomb
was built in a similar style and size, and placed just 30 meters away. A small
very realistic ivory statuette showing an anonymous old king might be a portrait of king Ka, but this
is pure guesswork.
Menes
This pharaoh is the legendary king that came from the town of This (Tinis) in Upper Egypt and took
over Lower Egypt (the North) by force. He then became the first king over the whole country and
founded a new capital for the united Egypt - Memphis (egy. Menefer), just where the two states
Many scholars have tried to point out who he was and the candidates have mostly been Narmer and
Aha. Narmer because he portrayed himself as the ruler of both Upper and Lower Egypt on his
famous green palette found within the temple area of the town of Hierakonpolis in Upper Egypt (as
seen above in the chapter "Historical Records").
King Aha, likely Narmer's son, on the other hand, was the first pharaoh who had monuments of
substance over the whole country, and his large tomb constructions (with buried retainers for the
first time) were in dimensions that far overshadowed his predecessors. He has also left a written
sign interpreted by some as the word "men" (meaning: "established") written beside his ordinary
name at one occasion. This once made him the favorite to be "Menes from Thinis" until the last
decade of the 1900s when the old royal tombs in Abydos were re-excavated. Then came to light two
remarkable seal impressions from the tombs of Den and Qaa, the fifth and eighth ruler of the first
dynasty. The motif was a line of kings in a successive order, and both had Narmer as the founder
of the first dynasty, followed by Aha. Analyzing the Egyptian tradition it looks like the deeds of
Menes might be an amalgam of components from several chiefs and legends, and thus it may not
be fruitful to identify him with a single historical person, though Narmer might have been the one
to finished the job by uniting the to kingdoms.
A linguistic possibility for Narmer being Menes is that the two sound elements Nar and Mer might
have been read in reverse order (common in later Egyptian history), making: Mernar, which gives a
similarity to the sounds of Mena - Meni.
Dynasty 3
Manetho's list
2649 - 2575 BC
During this dynasty Egyptian culture advanced rapidly. The beginning is dusky with
more than one candidate to be the founder. The table of Nabil Swelim below
is based on the opinion that the complex of Djoser was a cultural peak
that had developed for a period of about 60-80 years of the dynasty.
There is no general agreement among scholars on this table.
Khaba and Sa are usually put at the end of the dynasty
topped by Sanakht followed by his brother Djoser.
This era is famous for a new type of tomb
which gave Egypt fame through
of all times - the great
Pyramids.
At the temple of Seti I at Abydos (19th dynasty) five cartouches below hold the names of the
pharaohs from the third dynasty. The Turin canon (on papyrus) made half a century later has also
five names: Nebka, Djoser, Djosertety, (unknown name) and Huni.
Over 1.000 years had passed since dynasty 3 and minor rulers were probably excluded and the
positions and lengths of reigns for the others were probably uncertain.
Khaba
The correct position of this pharaoh is probably at the end of the dynasty and likely where the
Turin Canon has the entry "Hudjefa" (see menu left). Though the name Khaba appears in second
position (with a reign of 19 years) it is likely that the knowledge about him was wage when the list
With the intended five steps it would have been about 45 meters in height if it had been completed
but today only 17 meters remain above the sand.
Under ground huge galleries (very similar looking those from the pyramid of Sekhemkhet) were
hewn out but the burial chamber did not contain anything, not even a sarcophagus, when it was
entered in the late 1800s.
Facts that indicate that it was built in the middle or at the end of the dynasty is the increasing
ability of the Egyptians to manage to handle larger and larger stones, culminating during the end
of the Old Kingdom. Khaba's monument is built with stones of bigger size (for the pyramid's core)
than Djoser's, indicating it's younger. The construction has also an almost perfect orientation
North-South that most older monuments (including substructures) don't have.
If king Khaba is the regent historian Manetho calls Necheropes he is by tradition in the second
century BC said to have been in office for 28 years. This seems to be too long considering how
much (or little) have been finished of his monument.
If on the other hand he is the ruler referred to in Egyptian lists as Nebka, archaeological remains
have made an estimation of 3 to 5 years on the throne as more likely. In the Royal Canon of Turin
the name of the ruler noted before Huni is erased, but a reign of six years is readable.
It's disputable to put Khaba as the founder of the third dynasty and the reigns of his and
Sekhemkhet's were brief ones and generally estimated to be after king Djoser's.
The traditional sequence of kings for the dynasty still is among most Egyptologists: Sahnakht-
Djoser-Sekhemkhet-Khaba-Huni added with those who are only known from names in king lists or
fragments and have left no monuments to history.
<="" a="">
<="" a=""> Sa
This obscure king is another example of the scanty remains that history has provided us with
from parts of the third dynasty. If he was a separate king or just another name of someone better
known we don't know for sure but a strong indication is that he is identical to a Djoser (not the
king with the Step Pyramid) which in the Abydos list has the addition "za" to his name. His sereks
contain a single bird facing right and this is a sign also seen from a king (simply called Bird)
believed to have ruled for a short time during one of the dynasties prior to the third. Swelim puts
king Sa as the second in the dynasty and gives him the other names Sadjeser and Djeser and
identifies him with the ruler named Tosorthos from the list of Manetho (Africanus) or Sesorthos
(by Eusebius). This may be correct, but far from all Egyptologists (probably not even a majority)
will agree on this.
For a ruler being on the throne for 19 years (according to Swelim) remarkably little is left of his
deeds as monuments and inscriptions are concerned. All remains are three sereks with is name
marked on stone vessels found in the galleries under the step pyramid of King Djoser.
When looking at these one thing is striking - the identification of the king - the Horus falcon, is
put within the serek and not outside on top as all the other rulers had done in the past. This
design did not appear again from any king in the future and can be an indication that this is
secondary name (Sa) for another ruler better known. Candidates of some Egyptologists are king
Ba (below) and Bird (see this king in table of dynasty 1) whose position is very uncertain and has
been put in late dynasty 1 or in dynasty 2. In his book "Some problems on the history of the third
dynasty" from 1983 page 224, Swelim suggest in a table that the tomb of pharaoh Sa might be
found within the enclosure Gisr el Mudir at Sakkara. After some investigations the past years (up
to 2007) nothing has been found to support this theory.
<="" a="">
<="" a=""> Ba
Nobody knows for sure to which dynasty this obscure king belongs. His sereks were found
already in the first half of the 1800s, but during the end of the 1900s scholars have taken up
the question about when he had his reign.
There is a lack of agreement in this question and Egyptologists' opinions are divided spanning
between the later half of the second dynasty to the end of the third. In the second case he might fit
in to a period not so well known, where historian Manetho has more names on his list than
archaeology has been able to provide so far.
The three known signs building up his Horus-name (within a serek) has a human leg in two cases
and one of them (picture left) has no Horus falcon atop. The third inscription has an additional
sign of a ram and this has confused some Egyptologists and it's not quite sure that it's an
icon of the same pharaoh.
The human leg stands for the letter (and sound value) B and the name of a ram is
pronounced BA making it - BBA a confusing row of letters (possibly read Beba or Baba?). Some
scholars identify this ruler with king Birddue to the fact that the hieroglyphs have more or less the
same sound value. A majority of Egyptologists agree upon that he probably is to be put in during
the third dynasty, likely at the end with a brief period in office. Nabil Swelim and Peter Kaplony
take another view and put him in the first half of the period. Like in the case of pharao Sa above,
Swelim has suggested a place for his tomb and has chosen the so called "Ptahhotep enclosure"
in Sakkara. Nothing has been found (up to 2007) which can verify this theory. (See the table of
Swelim at top at the start of dynasty 3).
The 50 m long mastaba (light blue) was enlarged a bit with another (yellow).
The skeleton remains were found in the chamber (red) and big stone stoppers
(green) blocked the passage for robbers, to the owner's final resting place.
The mastaba at Beit Khallaf is almost untouched since 1902 when it was investigated. What is left
above ground today can be seen here in a couple of photos taken from a visit there in December
2006.
Almost nothing is known of his reign and in the king lists he occurs as in the list of Manetho as
Mesochris with a length of reign of seventeen years according to Swelim's list. Most other
Egyptologists agree on that he is the king called Nebka (Khaba) and that follows the tradition that
he was an elder brother of king Djoser.
The Egyptian lists give no indication of him, at least with a name that can be interpreted as him.
Among the very few remains of him are fragments from two depictions in stone found at the Sinai
peninsula, telling that there was active mining there during his reign. These are the only(?) two
depictions known of him up to now (April 2002).
Some fragments with his name have been recovered from various places like Sakkara and Aswan,
and a mud brick structure at Abw Rawash north of Giza has been connected to him on stylistic
third dynasty grounds as a suggestion. Today only fragments are left of what seems to have been
a quite large enclosed area (330x170m) with a 20 m square pyramid like massive structure in the
center. This place has been suggested by Nabil Swelim (1984) to be his tomb, but no names or
objects pointing towards the king have been found in the vicinity though.
Djoser
Djoser (Netjerykhet) actually meaning "King Ykhet" since Netjer was the Egyptian word for
king, and written as hieroglyphic sign: a flag on a pole, as seen inside his serek to the
right.
He is one of the most outstanding rulers in the whole Egyptian and human history. The remains
from his reign is of such a dignity that it turns a new chapter in the developing of mankind since
the invention of writing half a century earlier.
He was the first king to have the combination: supreme power - long reign, talent to pick officials
to organize the manpower and use the skills of the whole Egyptian people.
One of these officials was a man by the name of Imhotep (see him on Gods' list). He was of
unknown origin and is of some scientists today considered to be the king's son though he was
never mentioned as a prince. Under his supervision was made a gigantic enclosed area with a
building in great size made of hewn stone for the first time in history. It was the great tomb of his
master, the Step Pyramid, that he erected at the cemetery area of the capital Memphis. Today it's
known as the mortuary complex at Sakkara (see below) and is still standing to a great extant and
partly reconstructed. The monument has gone through many changes during its erection from
being a quite modest mastaba at the beginning. The substructure has lots of chambers where
finds from older kings as well have been found. It was obviously gathered here by orders from the
king himself, possibly to prevent robbers from scattering the remains of his forefathers.
Besides the step pyramid another monumental building was built during Djoser's reign. It is a
Sekhemkhet
King Sekhemket appears in the Turin Canon under the name of Djoser-Ti right after Djoser
and in front of an erased entry. His age is not present but the length of his reign is - 6
years. He was totally unknown until 1951 when his monument was excavated at Sakkara,
and after that few new remains of his have been found, the most recent a seal impression from the
remote southern fortified island of Elefantine i Aswan, published in 2005.
By looking at photographs taken from the air archaeologists knew that a long rectangular area
was situated just a couple of hundred meters south west of Djoser's complex. This turned out to
be the remains of the now called "Buried Pyramid". The name is from the title of the book written
by the chief archaeologist who dug it out in the early 1950s. Unfortunately he died before he had
publish a full report of his work.
The pyramid was once intended to be enclosed by a wall, but the whole was abandoned after a
few years of work, obviously because the owner had premature death.
The first one and a half steps were still in place when it was found, and it had a height of eight
meters. Probably it had been twice as high before the work was stopped, and the site had later
been a stone quarry for building material.
The base side was 132 meters and the final height would have been about 70 m, making the
monument larger than Djoser's.
Lots of work had been done to level the topography by a pattern of thick walls in squares filled
with debris. Under ground in the bedrock was a long corridor on three sides of the pyramid, from
which 132 store rooms were connected and exactly under the center was the king's burial
chamber, which held a small sensation.
On the way down into the inner constructions in the bedrock under the monument the floor in the
corridor (made of soft clay that had been brought there) revealed a first class treasure. There were
hundreds of stone bowls, many of them deliberately smashed, and above all - a group of
20 golden bracelets and armlets plus a little gold box made in form of a seashell. This is still (year
2002) the oldest finds of golden jewelry of its kind, from dynasty three and older, found in Egypt.
In a couple of places on the way down masonry blocked the passage and it was clearly shown
that the original work had been broken up and remade.
Inscriptions on a group of bowls gave the name of the owner - a until then unknown king called
Sekhemkhet, a name never seen before, and it was puzzling to science. When another name -
Djeserty, came up, the king could be identified from the list of Manetho as the successor of
pharaoh Djoser (see Swelim's table).
Now Egyptologists could reinterpret a stone relief from Wadi Maghara, a mining area in Sinai, as a
remnant from Sekhemkhet. He is seen in the traditional poses striding wearing the two crowns of
Egypt and slaying enemies with a mace.
When the grave chamber was reached a sensation waited - a sarcophagus made of white half
transparent alabaster and without a lid on top. Instead it had sliding panel at one of the gavels.
It had been repaired from wounds made by bits of rocks falling from the ceiling in the crude hewn
room that contained nothing else but this big coffin plus fragments of wood placed on it in a
circular form, first thought to be flowers. The entry through the sliding panel was sealed wit
gypsum and the expectations were high to find the mummy of the king inside.
When the sliding panel was lifted in 1954 with the world press and prominent guest present, the
stone coffin turned out to be totally empty. A good guess is that the tomb had been robbed a long
time ago and the mummy and the offerings taken away. The burial place had thereafter been
repaired in later times (probably during the New Kingdom) like other old monuments.
By the south side of the pyramid was placed a minor so-called "south tomb" (see picture above),
with remains of a mastaba construction above ground measuring circa 15x30 meters. The
substructure was - like the one of the pyramid, not finished. It was a single shaft with a chamber
30 m below the surface. When entered in 1967 it contained nothing but the remains of a wooden
coffin and the skeleton of a young boy of about 2-3 years of age. This can possibly be a son of the
king but nothing is sure about Sekhemkhet and his brief reign. Stone vases and gold leaf
fragments from jewelry were also found in this obviously looted tomb.
Nebkare
Archaeologist Swelim proposes that Nebkara was the IIIrd Dynasty king who began the huge
Unfinished Pyramid of Zawyiet el Aryan. On a dozen pieces of wood and ivory names in
hieratic writing within the cartouches have been found (picture right). They have been
proposed to be read as Nefer-ka, Neb-ka plus half a dozen more including Ba-ka and Bik-ka which
was a king probably from dynasty 4 (see him).
Some scholars think he is identical to Neferkare below which shows the lack of agreement (and
finds) regarding this period. The only signs readable for sure is the one without a royal cartouche
(bottom) is Nefer-ka, and it's not sure that this name means the same king as the signs within the
typical royal oval that are unique (beside the clearly ka-sign) and have only been found at this site.
Swelim points out that bones found by the archaeologist Wain- wright in the burial chamber of the
very large Mastaba #17 at Meidum (in map at king Huni below), could be those of Nebkare.
The find was rare because the body appeared to have been defleshed and the eyes torn out and
replaced by paste balls. The limbs (including the penis) had been cut off(?) and wrapped in
bandages separately. Wooden models of the royal insignia (mace and crook) were also found in
the chamber (Wainwright: Meidum p. 13 ff and plate XI). The scenario looks like a restoration after
damage made by grave robbers, and the royal insignia is a remarkable piece of evidence that
indicates a burial of a king.
The fact that the big sarcophagus still is in place is due to the fact that it was built into the grave
chamber during the erection of the tomb and impossible to remove without making a huge tunnel
from outside.
Neferkare - Qa-Hedjet
This pharaoh was unknown to Egyptologists as depicted by the name of Qa-Hedjet until the late
1960s when a stele came forward after being hidden for 5.600 years. Instead of hieroglyphs within
the serek with his Horus-name, this pharaoh had a picture of the white royal crown of Upper Egypt
- the Hedjet, (picture below right).
He is embraced by the god Horus, the incarnation of the king's person.
The unusual name can be some sort of expression from the monarch that he descended
from that part of the country. In 1983 Swelim "identified" him with king Huni.
By the artistic style scientists could place the stele as being a work from time of the third
dynasty and today most of Egyptologists think that this is the Horus- name of pharaoh Neferka(-
re) known from several king lists.
The three parts Nefer (beautiful), Ka (soul) and Re (the solar god) were very common at the time
and so were Nub (gold) and Neb. When these parts plus the name of the crown showed up in
writing as "Nebnubhedjet" it could be recognized as probably another form of the name due to the
unique crown.
As for the earthly remains from this ruler, the pages in the history books are blank, or maybe
dusky.
No building has yet been classified as his with certainty. Swelim has stated that Neferka "seems
to have completed the burial chamber of Mastaba 17 at Meidum for the reburial of Nebkare and
filled the trench and pit of the Unfinished Pyramid in the style of architecture that would have
pleased Nebkare". (See text on Nebkare above and picture at Snofru below).
Hudjefa
the lost pharaohs
When the Royal Canon of Turin was made during the 1200s BC, a couple of names in the origi- nal
list that it was copied from were illegible.
To mark this fact the working scribe wrote "hudjefa" (erased) inside the cartouche.
Egyptologists in the early times wrongly took it for a name of a pharaoh.
The entries give the kings' so called "newsy-bity" name starting with the title: "He of the sedge
and the bee". These were the symbols of Upper and Lower Egypt and the title thus means "king
over the two countries".
Next is the cartouche with the king's name, and a seated falcon marking the end of the name.
Then it's a crooked stick for "time" and the circle and half-circle for "rule", followed by the years
of his reign in years and months. The figures after the second black point tell the age of the king
when he died.
In the second entry most of the hudjefa mark is unreadable, but the two birds tell what was
inscribed. Thus we have two anonymous kings and some facts about them. The one from dynasty
two might be king Khaba (see him) who started a pyramid at Zawiyet el Aryan. Here he is put in
dynasty two instead of three.
The one from dynasty three can possibly be one of two named Akhes and Sephuris by Manetho.
At least the position and duration of their reign according to Swelim (table at top of the page) are
rather well fitting.
1) Second last king of dynasty 2: reign - 8 years and 4 months, age: 34 years.
2) Second last king of dynasty 3: reign - 6 years. The rest of the entry is lost.
The Sakkara list is from a private tomb made during the same era. It has just one hudjefa-notation
like the one from the second dynasty above. It's written in the same position replacing the lost
name of an unknown ruler who died in his early thirties.
It is quite possible that we today know his name without knowing that he should be placed where
a Hudjefa sign was put. Some of the single or rarely occurring names of kings found from the
dusky second dynasty period might be his.
He built a pyramid at Meidum close to the northern edge of the Faiyum basin. The identifi-cation of
him as the owner has been made indirectly since his name doesn't appear in the monument itself.
It is very likely that it was finished by his successor Snofru who was either his son or son-in-law.
This pyramid was the first to have straight and smooth sides instead of a number of steps that
was the case of the similar monuments from the earlier period.
Some of the casing of lime stones is still in its original place on one side.
The technique also improved and from now on the stones in the masonry were always placed
horizontally whether the construction was leaning or not. The general assumption up to recently
was that the smooth casing stones put there by Snofru had collapsed a long time ago leaving
what is visible today - the inner core in threes steps looking like a broad tower. However all the
debris surrounding the building are hardly a part of the original construction and thus brought
there later. A guess is that it was a ramp for mining the fine smooth limestone when it was taken
The grave chamber does not contain a sarcophagus (today) and there is no trace of a burial, but
this does not mean that Huni didn't have his final resting place here.
The geographical location of the pyramid shows a break of tradition, because he moved the royal
cemetery 90 kilometers to the south from the Sakkara area. North of the pyramid lots of tombs
from his son Snofru's court are placed. Two of them are the largest mastabas in Egypt and one
(number 16) measures 60 x 120 meters and is a double tomb of Snofru's son Nefermaat and a high
ranked official. Number 17 is situated right by the north-east side of the Huni's pyramid enclosure
(marked D in picture above) and is 100 meters long. The owner's name is not known.
The Egyptologist Nabil Swelim suggests that Huni possibly is the builder of a very small and not
so well known brick pyramid within a large enclosure at Abu Roash 8 km north of Giza. It is placed
in the plain a couple of hundred meters south of the pyramid of Djedefre. Built around a rather
large rock formation it has an ascending corridor from the north side and a grave chamber made
in a way typical for the early fourth dynasty. Though built of mud bricks (unique for the period if
dated correctly) Swelim suggests it might be the work of king Huni.
Dynasty 4
Manetho's list
Snofru
Snofru was the founder of the 4th dynasty and most likely the
son of his predecessor king Huni and one of his secondary
wives - Meresankh I.
His Horus name Neb Maat "Lord Of The Harmony" is seen
within the serek in picture left and his personal namn Snofru
within the cartouche to the right.
By marrying one of his half-sisters Hetepheres I, Snofru
became the pharaoh over the two countries.
His queen seems to have given him only one surviving child -
Khufu, but with two secondary consorts he had: Nefermaat,
Rahotep, Ranofer, Kanofer and Ankh-haf plus one whose
name is unknown. The first two were buried at Meidum.
His internal policy seems to have been focused on
maintaining centralized power and prevent it to spread among high-placed
officials and nobilities. He therefore rearranged the land- ownership nation
wide, probably to prevent these classes from becoming too powerful.
Snofu
Snofru completed the big pyramid at Meidum, a monument presumed to have
The inner design was of similar architectural type in both pyramids - sloping corridors ending with
grave chambers and a couple of rooms. Most chambers had corbelled roofs making it look like an
inverted pyramid from inside.
The impressive northern pyramid became the first "real" pyramid with straight sides and is also
called the "Red Pyramid". Its low angle of ~43 is just like the upper part of its bent neighbor 2
kilometers to the south. It was called "The Shining Pyramid" (picture below left).
No cracks disturbed the project and the inner core of local stone was hewn to
fit more accurately than in the Bent Pyramid. All the casing stones have been
removed a long time ago with exception of an area at the bottom of the east
side where it still is in place.
Evidence in writing from a stone in the Northern Pyramid tells that it was
started on before the other one was finished and thus they were built partly simultaneously.
Snofru was considered to have been a good and wise pharaoh by the after living (his son Khufu
Khufu
Pharaoh Khufu was the son of his predecessor Snofru and
is today best known by the name Kheops.
His Horus name within the serek left means: (He who)
strikes (i.e. crushes the enemies). Old Greek historians gave
him a reign of 50 and 65 years, but these figures are far too
high. The Egyptian Royal canon of Turin gives him 23 years
and modern Egyptologists estimate his reign to be just
about that - a quarter of a century.
He had at least four wives, with whom he had several
children. Queen Henutsen gave him the son Khafre (a king
to be) and another and probably the oldest son was Djedefre
who also was the very next king to take office.
He continued the expansionist policies of his father Snofru
by extending the Egyptian borders to the north-east to Khufu
Medjedu include Sinai and Upper Egypt maintaining mili-tary
presence to protect economic resources like mines. He held economic links
with Syria in the north and Nubia in the south.
Khufu built his funerary monument away from his father's and moved from Dashur 40 km
northwards to the limestone plateau at Giza. There he erected
the Great Pyramid, a monument that has made him one of the most
famous kings of the Ancient Egyptian history. It got the poetic name:
"The pyramid which is the place of sunrise and sunset" (shown in
picture left).
An old misunderstanding is that slaves built the pyramids, but this is
not true. The bulk of the working force toiling on the pyramids were common citizens who had
nothing to do during the flooding of the Nile when the cultivated land was under water. Recent
discoveries (year 2000) from the Giza plateau have shown that they were housed and paid, at least
some of them. They were even buried near the pyramid, and could thus be a part of the king's
eternal life and cult after death.
A Middle Kingdom story from the Westcar Papyrus, describes Khufu as a cruel tyrant with no
respect for life. Right or wrong we don't know, but a fact is that portraits in any form of Khufu
seem to have vanished and only on tiny statuette made of ivory remains, it was found in Abydos
in Upper Egypt. This is a strong indication that his memory for some reason was delibe-rately
erased after his death.
Like his father before him he had a reign relatively free from threats from outside the country. He
took measures to maintain the positions by military force in economically important regions like
the Sinai Peninsula for its valuable minerals and Nubia for its treasures of fine stone, preferably
red granite used for buildings. His aftermath is dark and he was said to have ignored the gods (!),
an accusation that looks like being a political statement by someone trying to strengthen his own
position at the moment. Anyhow Khufu has gone to history as the builder of the single most
impressive monument of all times.
Djedefre
Khafre
Khafre was the son of king Khufu and queen Henutsen, and
followed his elder half-brother as pharaoh. He was married
with his (half?) sister with whom he had the son, Menkaure,
the king to be. At least six more off springs of his are known
by name.
It's not known why he succeeded by his half-brother on the
throne, but it is possible that none of his former king's sons
had survived and that Khafre thus was the oldest surviving
male descendant of their father Khufu.
The Turin canon records a rule for him of more than 20 years
and according to Manetho and Herodotos it was 66. (The two
Greek historians took out "maximum" of years for most of the
pyramid builders to help them to finish their monuments).
Today it's generally accepted however, that he ruled for about
Weserib 26 years, possibly a few more.
In the picture upper left his Horus name is shown within a serek, meaning "Strong of Heart".
During his reign the solar-religion grew in importance and like his brother before him he adopted
the title "Son of Re", a tradition that lasted for over a millennium.
He built his pyramid at Giza a bit south of his father's great monument and in a
loftier position making it look bigger, but it's a bit smaller in all directions. The
humble name it was given was "The Great Pyramid" (hieroglyphs in picture left).
The interior is much simpler than the structures shown within his father's
monument. Down at the Nile he erected an impressive Valley Temple of red
granite that's still standing to a great extent. Just outside alongside the ceremonial path up to the
In front of its paws are the remains of a contemporary building called the "Sphinx Temple" where
10 colossus statues of the king once had stood. It was probably never finished and has a court
yard similar to that in the Mortuary Temple a bit uphill by the pyramid. The present state of this
construction is poorer than his Valley Temple.
Khafre had a reign similar to his father with great prosperity in Egypt and almost no disturb- ance
from the outside. The central power was maintained and stability and continuity were factors that
were put forward. Despite the seemingly conservative society, progress in all sectors were
constantly going on.
Bikka (Nebka)
An unknown pharaoh with a great unfinished monument
Pharaoh Bikka is a shadowy ruler though he is placed right in the middle of the most famous of all
dynasties in Egyptian history - the fourth. His brief reign is the reason to his anonymity among
archaeologists but he is named Bakare (like in the cartouche below right) in later king lists by his
countrymen, and put between Khafre and Menkaure (see picture below).
Menkaure
The King
and his women
Menkaure is shown as a
healthy well built and
rather young man as he
poses with the goddess
Hathor (left) and a deity
guarding a province. It is
today in the Egyptian Mu-
seum in Cairo.
Menkaure is the king from the Old Kingdom that Egyptologists have the best knowledge about as
far as his physical appearance is concerned. This is due to a lucky strike made by American
archaeologist Reisner in 1910 when he found half a dozen undestroyed statues of the king
Shepseskaf
Shepseskaf was probably not of royal stock and if so had
to marry in to the royal family to get hold of the throne.
When he came to power there are indi- cations of some
disorder in Egypt. His first years seem to have been quite
difficult with confron- tations with various groups of
priests and probably parts of the nobility as well. The
most serious was when provinces rebelled against his
authority. If the conflict escalated beyond civil obedience
we don't know, but it probably did not. He restored order
in the country and could to some degree complete his
predecessor Menkaure's monument at Giza.
His Horus name meaning "Horus whose Body Is Noble" is seen within a serek in
the picture left.
The only depiction possibly to be of him is a head of white alabaster (above
right), but its identification is very disputable since it was found in the Valley
Shepseskhet Temple of Menkaure whose characteristics it seems to have.
Shepseskaf is unique in Egyptian history by making an invention of his own for
his grave monument, today called "Mastabat el-Faran" - Pharaoh's
Mastaba.
It was called "the Purified Pyramid" though the hieroglyph in the name (in
picture left) was of another shape. This construction was formed as a
sarcophagus-like mastaba with a slightly vaulted roof, and placed 20 km
south of Giza 3 km south of the old cemetery of Sakkara. If this new
design (never to be repeated) was a sign of some shifting religious beliefs is uncertain, but by this
he broke the building tradition accepted by the pharaohs in the past. The superstructure was of
simple design with the grave chamber placed asymmetric to the geometrical center of the
construction.
An overview of the building shows its great size (100x74x19 m) and it was once cased with white
limestone now long since gone. The whole area was enclosed with two stonewalls in a rectangular
shape as the monument itself. Much of it has been quarried away a long time ago. The stone
blocks in the construction were generally larger than those used in the pyramids at Giza showing
that the Egyptians gradually learned to handle block of greater size.
Nothing much is known of his deeds and when his brief reign of about seven years came to an
end, it closed the dynasty. Never again should the glory like dynasty four repeat itself and no king
should have the means to make similar monuments in the future. When Egypt once again became
a mighty power in the Middle East a great deal of the recourses were put outside its borders to
maintain this strength. The time of divine ruling and gigantic project made in a religious belief of a
living god was ended for good.
Dynasty 5
Manetho's list
Under this dynasty the art and craftsmanship reached its peak.
Eight pyramids from nine rulers are known up to now and most of them
are placed at the new royal burial ground at Abusir.
The faith in the country took a new path with the solar cult as dominant.
The real power was slowly going over from the kings
to influential classes in society.
Table of dynasty V
Name Manetho Reign Manetho Pyramid
1 Userkaf Ogserkeris 7 28 Sakkara
Userkaf
King Userkaf was related to the royal house from more than
one side. He was the grandson of king Djedefre and he
married a daughter of king Menkaure.
His Horus name Userkaf (within the serek left) means "Horus,
Who Does What Is Right", and his personal nomen Userkaf
(within the cartouche right) means "His Ka Is Strong". He
moved to the very heart of the Sakkara cemetery for his tomb
and had the nerve to erect his tomb monument only fifty
meters from the enclosure wall of the mortuary complex of
Djoser, then over 200 years old and probably with his cult still
in action.
Beside the planning of his tomb, Userkaf began a totally new
type of building project at Abusir a couple of kilo- meters to
the north, where most of his followers should erect their
Irimaat pyramids. This was something quite unique - a construction
of a Sun Temple separated from is tomb. Userkaf
This cult center of the sun god Re, had a gigantic stone obelisk as the totem,
symbolizing the sun. An altar was placed for offerings and the Palermo stone (made later in this
dynasty) states that two oxen were sacrificed here every day. This faith had by now grown to a
national cult and from now on the king had as one of his titles: "Son of Re".
When this site was excavated in the 1950s it turned out to be in a severe state of ruin since it had
Userkaf's pyramid
at Sakkara
The effort taken on the inner construction was high and huge blocks were used with great
precision for the grave chambers throughout the dynasty. When the fine casing blocks were taken
away many years later, parts of the core collapsed leaving all the Abusir pyramids in a state of
ruin.
The causeway entered the enclosure wall at the southeast corner, but today nothing is left of it. Its
destination by the Nile - the Valley Temple, is also yet to be found.
Userkaf was a great inventor with his sun temple and great obelisk that became standard for the
rest of the dynasty. This has given him a special position in the Egyptian history though his reign
was only about seven years.
Today four of the original six steps of the core are visible in
Nefererkare's pyramid when the casing stones are gone. The
design was later altered and the sides were made straight.
This first example of this sort of text surely had a long time of development and is this king's most
notable contribution to Egyptology. When decrypted and published in the 1960s it turned out to be
parts of the royal archive at the site. It contained details of the administration for guarding the
temples, taking care of the daily offerings like bread, beer, meat, fowl, corn and fruit. It also
showed tables for regular inspections and records of the equipment in the cult of the dead
pharaohs.
Documenting the deeds of king Neferirkara Kakai is tricky, and one of his officials named Ty is
more known about. Thus we do not know anything about his political affairs within the country
and abroad, nor do we know how he held the borders against nomad tribes. He is likely to have
followed the "scheme" made by his predecessors, and the general impression is that his reign
was a peaceful period.
Shepseskare
Little to nothing is known about king Shepseskare apart from his name.
Almost all Egyptologists agree on that he ruled for a short period between
Neferirkare and Neferefre, but a few think he ruled after these two.
His kinship (if any) to the other kings of the 5th Dynasty is not known. The
Royal Canon of Turin and Manetho (who calls him Sesiris) notes him for a
reign of seven years, and this seems to be a plausible figure.
In the Abydos list he is omitted but his name is present in the Sakkara list.
His Horus-name within a serek (seen in picture right) is "Sekhemkhau"
meaning "The Power Has Appeared" where the club stand for power and the
rising sun for appearance. This was found in the mortuary temple of king
Neferefre.
Very few remains from his time have been found at Abusir. It's seal
impressions dated to his reign and these are almost the only contem- porary
finds from his brief time on the throne so far (2004).
There is a large remnant at Abusir that probably is from him though - what is left
of a big pyramid. It is situated north of the complex of Sahure and was found as
late as in the 1980s. The work on the monument was hardly begun before it was
stopped and consists only of earthwork. The area had been leveled and a
foundation was made for the lowest part of the construction - the burial
chamber. It's possible that the pyramid was intended to be the biggest of all at
Abusir, with a base side measuring just over 100 meters, similar in length to
king Nefererkere's pyramid.
His title (nomen) in his roll as "Son of Re" is seen within the cartouche left. The
duck is a homonym for the word "son" and the sun disc symbolizes his "father"
- the solar god Re.
His name is put together of the components: flag on a pole (or axe), quail, staff,
folded cloth and a mouth and maybe it makes "Netjer-weserw".
Since the kings of dynasty five were completing the buildings of their
predecessors (if they were almost finished) it's likely that Shepseskare just had
started on his own monuments when he passed away and sailed to "the land in
the west". The planned size of his pyramid indicates that he wasn't an old man
when he reached office hoping for a long reign, but obviously he had not.
Neferefre (Raneferef)
Neuserre Izi
Menkauhor
Djedkare Isesi
After several more or less professional diggings over the years the pyramid was examined in the
1980s and found very damaged and difficult to excavate. The valley temple has had just a few brief
investigations and some remains of walls with reliefs from the causeway have been found. At the
Nile side the topography is a heavy slope and great efforts have been taken to make the
foundation to the mortuary temple. Flanking the entrance were two square massive, tower-like
pylons. The entrance hall had very massive walls, perhaps to support a vaulted roof. The entrance
was once paved in alabaster all the way into the temple courtyard.
Unas
King Unas is in many ways a shadowy ruler in
Egyptian history. His Horus name (picture
right) was Wadj-tawy, meaning: "Horus, the
flourishing one of the Two Lands". Science
has not obtained much of the activities during
his long reign and his death seems to have
started some sort of confusion and instability
at the tran- sition into the next dynasty. This
might be due to an estimation that he left no
heir to take over his throne, but his two first
queens are known by name - Khenut and
Nebit. The knowledge about Unas comes to a
great extant from his pyramid at Sakkara,
which he built just outside the south enclosure
wall of Djoser's pyramid complex. It is the smallest but most
technically advanced of all from the Old Kingdom. Its grave
One of few depictions of Unas when chamber is decorated with religious spells cut into the walls, the
he is breast fed by goddess Isis. so-called Pyramid Texts, and it was the first royal tomb to
contain such hieroglyphic writing.
From the well preserved causeway down to his valley temples reliefs have been found from the
walls of this once roofed pathway. Boats are coming with granite columns from the south
quarries, people working in markets places, nomad hunters at the edge of the desert etc.
The pyramid complex of Unas was built in a traditional way but the
building was the smallest of those from the fifth dynasty, 43 m high.
Some reliefs show the effect of famine with poor people looking like skin and bone. Asiatic traders
are seen arriving in Egypt by boat and nomad living at desert edge is illustrated by naturalistic
Dynasties 6-11
Dynasties 6-8
2323 BC. - c.2134 BC.
and
The First Intermediate Period
Dynasties 9-11 c. 2134 - 1991 B.C.
by Ottar Vendel
Dynasty 6
Manetho's list
Teti
Teti's Horus name, Seheteptawy, (picture right) means "He who pacifies the Two
Lands". Most of the court officials from king Unas were still in power during his
reign and through them some of his deeds are known.
We know that he started quarry work in Upper Egypt, and that he maintained
commercial and diplomatic relations with the trade center of Byblos in Syria,
valuable for import of timber. He also may have initiated expeditions like his
predecessors, towards the land Punt and Nubia. As for the latter he is attes-ted
for as far south as the town of Tomas.
At a temple at Abydos we can read about his generous ex- empting from taxes,
probably after a bad season of agriculture
There is only one statue found of him, found by his tomb. He is portrayed as a
middle aged man with fleshy cheeks and big piercing eyes.
The historian Manetho states that Teti ended his life in a very unusual way for a
pharaoh - he was murdered. The men behind the possible asassination are not
mentioned, but an assumption is that the next king to be, who was of obscure Seheteptawy
origin, might have had something to do with his death. No evidence is present
today (2002) though to confirm such a conspiratory theory.
His pyramid was built at south Sakkara a couple of hundred meters northeast of Djoser's
complex. It contains pyramid texts, written on the limestone-covered walls of the burial- and
antechambers. This tradition was begun by his prede- cessor and followed by most pyramid
builders after him. When the burial ch- amber was entered an unfinished decorated sarcophagus
(now gone) was found and an arm and shoulder of a mummy, presumed to be the king's, was
found on the floor. This looks like a grave robbery executed in haste.
The valley temple and causeway are located to the southeast and have not been properly
investigated. Outside the main complex are small pyramids of his con- sorts and tombs of his two
viziers Mereruka and Kagemni known for their well preserved tombs with many fancy reliefs and
paintings.
Modern Egyptians call for some reason Teti's monument "The Prison Pyramid" and name
in hieroglyphs was a pillar of strength (Djed), three thrones and a pyramid (picture
below) meaning - "The Pyramid which is Enduring of Places". The places are the green
thrones and the pillar was the symbol of stability and continuity, which the Egyptians were
keen on maintaining.
About 90 meters north of Teti's complex are situated two small pyramids (c. 20 x 20 x 20 meters)
from his first queen Iput (I) and another of his favorites called Khuit. Their remains were
discovered in the beginning of the 20th century and no valley temples, cult pyramids or
causeways seems to have been built. In 2008 investigations started at the site and hopefully new
information on these tombs will come to light.
Userkare
Pepi I
One of the names of Pepi I was "The Ka (soul) of Re is power- ful" (in
picture left) and reflects back on the traditional solar cult from Heliopolis
that was slowly loosing its grip as the most imp- ortant manifestation of
the diver- ted religion of Egypt.
When he ascended the throne he had the name of his predecessor king Userkare
removed wherever possible, indicating a feud in the royal family.
Many building projects of his are known from Bubastis in the delta to Aswan in
the south, but little of it remains. Some of it was possibly incorporated into later
projects made by other rulers, but he did leave behind many inscriptions from
his time telling about his deeds during his three decade reign.
He organized expeditions to Sinai and Nubia and has left rock carving in Wadi
Hammamat, a 120 km long path between the Nile valley and the Red Sea.
One most remarkable find from this king was made in Hierakonpolis in Upper
Egypt. It was a large copper statue of him and his little son Merenre, which is
Pepi unique in Egyptian history. The head in the picture above in from this piece of
art.
He built his pyramid complex at south Sakkara four kilometers south of Djoser's complex and a
couple of hundred metres from the pyramid of fifth dynasty king Djedkare Isesi. During the 19th
dynasty it was restored and text from this occasion tells that it was in good condition at that time,
though it by then had been standing for almost a millenium.
When early Egyptologists entered the subterranean rooms from the north side entrance in the late
1800s, they found pyramid texts incised in the walls, spreading light over the builder of the
monument and more. The valley temple and causeway are still to be investigated, but the remains
of them seem to be very few. The mortuary complex was almost a duplicate of Teti's and the
pyramid was of six dynasty standard size: a 79 m square with a height of 53. It also had a
name of its own: "The Established and Beautiful Pyramid" (picture below).
Today this beauty is a twelve-meter high ruin.
In a single papyrus document an officer tells about his participation in the king's five
campaigns into Palestine reaching as far as up to mount Carmel. These military actions were
made both on land trough infantry and cavalry, and by the Egyptian navy at sea.
Merenre I
(Nemtyemsaf I)
The relationships within the royal family were more complicated than usual during Merenre's time
and his younger half brother (the Pepi II to be) was also his cousin, stepson and son-in-law(!).
This plus the fact that several persons wore the same names makes it tricky to make a table to
make a grip of the royal family structure.
A most valuable find of his is and totally unique for Egypt and the Middle East region as well, is
a copper statue found at Hierakonpolis in Upper Egypt.
Other remains from his time are:
1) A small sphinx of him in the National Museum of Scotland, Edinburgh.
2) A box made of hippopotamus ivory in the Louvre Museum in Paris France.
3) An inscriptions on ivory found at his pyramid temple at Giza.
4) Notes in biographies from owners of private tombs in Abydos (2 notations), Elephantine, Deir
el-Gabrawi, Edfu and Sakkara.
His name has also been found in rocks carvings in the Wadi Hammamat path between the Nile
Valley and the Red Sea, and in alabaster quarries.
The name of Merenre's pyramid was: "The Shining and Beautiful Pyramid". The sign for
shining (at far left) was the red sun with its yellow beams by the horizon folowed by the
sign "nefer" standing for beauty.
Except for finds at his burial ground the mayor remains of Pepy II are:
1) A statuette made of calcite with the young king sitting on his mother's lap.
2) A stone head found in a shrine at Koptos can possibly be a depiction of him.
3) A big (58 cm) brown stone relief fragment with his name, found at Koptos.
4) Five written decrees found at Giza, Abydos, Koptos (3) plus another (now
in the Egyptian Museum in Cairo) recording one of his many Sed festivals.
5) Inscription found in the mortuary temple of Ipwet II, Merenre I's daughter.
6) The king mentioned in tombs of Djau at Abydos and Ibi at Deir el-Gabrawi.
7) Smaller items like - a calcite vessel, faience plaques, an ivory headrest with
his name and titles written on it and various objects found at Byblos in Syria.
8) A small shrine at Abydos may have been a Ka-chapel built during his reign.
Merenre II
(Nemtyemsaf II)
Merenre Djefaemsaf
The sixth dynasty was coming to an end in many ways, and civil disorder and lack of central
power speeded up this process.
Pharaoh Merenre Nemtyemsaf II (whose whole nomen and prenomen "Merenre Djefaemsaf" is
seen in the cartouche above) had not reign but a year when he was murdered, and this is quite
unique in Egyptian history despite several periods of decline and civil war.
Both the historian and the Royal Canon of Turin agree on the facts that his reign was little over a
year, not long enough to leave any material remains. Thus we do not know where his tomb is, nor
do science have any depictions in any form to tell what he looked like.
This lack of information can be partly compensated by his better known and more written about
sister/widow Nitokris below which contains a history told by a Greek historian how he ended his
days by being murdered.
Nitokris
Nitekreti
Romantic myths have been told in later times about Queen Nitokris (in Egyptian: Neitkrety or
Where to put Nitokris instead is now anybody's guess, and maybee she's just a ro- mantic
fabrication by people to tell by the camp fire in the evenings. This tale was later taken as a
description of real historical events by scholars like Manetho and has been carried on as such
well into the 20th century.
Dynasty 7
2150 - 2134?
During this period chaos ruled the country and civil disorder split the nation into different centers
of power. Thus the names of the pharaohs can be many since at times three of them had their
reign simultaneously over unknown areas. The Turin Canon has few entries and notes this was
955 years after the unification by king Menes, a semi mythical event that likely happened around
3150 BC.
Manetho uses a metaphor to discribe the state in which Egypt was during this period: "70 kings
ruled for 70 days". The Abydos list has 17 kings (see below) for dynasties 7-8. Other minor
sources have given the names: Menkamin I-II, Nefer- kare V-VI, Ibi I, Sekhemkare, Iti, Imhotep, Isu
and Iytenu. No one of these rulers has been attested for by archaeological remains of substance
except their names.
Neferkahor
Dynasty 8
2150 - 2134 BC ?
By this time Egypt had been divided into at least three parts. The capital Memphis had no longer
power over Upper Egypt (Herakleopolis) and parts of the delta.
Aboute a dozen kings from Memphis are known, just by their names
at the Abydos list and have left no traces from their reigns. From
what's possibly dynasty 8 and onwards the Turin Canon has
two notations similar to the Abydos list. The color of
the numbers below indicate where the entry
comes from. The Abydos list only (blue
numbers) or from the Turin
Canon as well (black).
1 2 3 4 5 6
Wadjkare
King Wadjkare (meaning: "Prosperous is the Soul of Re") is known from a written
remain from his exemption decree with a cartouche containing his throne name. A very
long birth name (Demedjibtawy) has by some scholars been considered his, and
others claim that he (Wadjkare) actually was a king from dynasty ten or nine with the
possible name Neferkare II.
His residence was probably located in the capital Memphis and he is one of few kings
from this dusky era (dynasties 7-10) who has left archaeological remnants confirming
Qakare Ibi
The ruler stands out from others during this period and is
confirmed by the Turin Canon and the temple wall of Abydos,
plus a quite substantial amount of graffiti in a remote place in
Nubia called Tomas.
Nothing about his deeds during his short reign (possibly just a
few years) is known. His throne name as pharaoh: Qakare Ibi
means, "Strong is the Soul of Re" (in the picture left) and his
birth name was the shorter Ibi (picture right). He built a
small pyramid located at South Sakkara, near the same type of
monument from Pepi II. It was the last to be built on this
classical burial ground (see its plan in the illustration below).
It was investigated already in the early 1800s by the German
Egyptologist Lepsius who found it to be a true pyramid though
it by then looked more like a mastaba in its ruined state. The
identification of the builder has been made through reading
hieroglyphic writings on the walls inside the grave chamber, the latest so called "pyramid texts"
known. Today the inscriptions are protected by concrete con-structions within the monument,
which is just a pile of rubble, three meters high.
The whole complex was not oriented in the cardinal directions (see picture above) and the
mortuary temple was built of bricks and hardly more elaborated in size than a small chapel. No
causeway has been detected leading from it and there possibly never was one, and the same goes
for a valley temple.
The measures of the pyramid are roughly estimated but the sides are likely to have been 31,5
meters and the height of the building about 21 meters.
<="" a="">
Dynasties 9 and 10.
c. 2134 - 1970 B.C.
Dynasties 9-10 from Herakleopolis in the north saw around 18 kings during almost a century and
for a period the north seem to have control down to Abydos area just before Thebes conquered
the whole country. Seven kings were called Khety it's the same name as Akhtoy in Greek:
Achtoes. Beneath are the entries from the Turin Canon (damaged just there) and probably all
kings are from Herakleopolis.
Neferkare Khety, ..., Senen..., Meribre?, Shed...y, H... Meribre, Khety (four kings), Neferkare
Ankhtify, Kaneferre, Merikare, Neferkare Khety, Wahkare Khety, Meryhathor, Iytjenu.
The division into two dynasties is not from contemporary text, but added later.
<="" a="">The two kings closing dynasty 10 have been rather well known:
Meribre Khety VII has left a famous document in which he gives his son (below) instructions how
to deal with disobedient nobilities and social crisis and explains how to strengthen the power of
the state (i.e. the king) during troublesome times.
Merikare
Merikare has been known to the afterworld mainly for two reason:
Closing this period is a mysterious king from Middle Egypt by the name:
Khui
An obscure ruler with a big monument
The name of pharaoh Khui means "protector" (seen within the cartouche right)
and has been found just once under rather odd circumstances. It was in
connection to the investigation of quite an object for this unstable period of
disorder and a weak central power. This king possibly built (or at least worked
on) a very big tomb at the otherwise unknown site of Dara located 35 km
downstream (north of) the town Asyut in Middle Egypt.
It was probably intended to be a pyramid or mastaba of some sort, and it still
stands clearly visible in its ruined state today.
The first notation of substance of it comes from a digging there in the early
years of the 1900s, resulting in a short article in the Egyptian Museum magazine
ASAE in 1912.
Some forty years later it was investigated again for two sea- sons (1946-1948) by
the French archaeologists Raymond Weill who wrote about the digging in a 12
page article in the same publication in 1947. He concluded his work by an adding
up in a thin book of around 130 pages in 1958, and regrettably just published in Khui
French.
The tomb is located on the western bank around 300 meters from the flood plain and the remains
of the construction makes it unclear whether it was a pyramid or some kind of stepped mastaba,
because the remnants of the mud brick walls have sloping sides and are built in steps. This has
left the door open for ideas about what it once could have looked like and thus it has generated
some more or less plausible theories.
As expected opinions among Egyptologists are divided about its original (or inten- ded) design as
wella as its age. The plan is slightly rectangular with the impres- sing measurements 146 by 136
meters, the far largest since tombs of mighty rulers from the Old Kingdom times.
It's also turned slightly counter clockwise from a north-south direction, just like many Old
Kingdom tombs are. In addition a very exclusive detail was found when trying to determine its
outer limits - the corners were heavily rounded (diameter: c. 23 m) and this is a very rare feature in
ancient Egyptian architecture.
Today (year 2008) it's in a ruined state and it's difficult to say if it was dismantled after once being
finished, or if it was finished at all, which it probably wasn't.
A strong possibility, not to say a likely explanation, is that Khui's building origi-nally was an
unfinished Old Kingdom monument, which has been taken over by local leaders during history.
An examination using modern methods might give results complementing those from the 1940s
and dates from more than one period are not excluded but rather to be expected.
Dynasty 11
c. 2134 - 1991 B.C. (c. 143 years)
Some charts put this dynasty into the Middle Kingdom and most have six rulers
starting with Antef I. The kings called Mentuhotep can be three or four depending
on which one is concidered the first "real" pharaoh. Their throne names is the
best way for an identification. After 85 years of ruling just the area of Thebes, a
king from there started a war and reunited Egypt after 15 years of struggle. The
lifestyle and local gods of the south were then introduced to the whole country.
Mentuhotep (I)
Chief of Thebes
Antef I
King Antef I was the founder of the 11th Dynasty
and son of the local tribe chief of Thebes -
Mentuhotep (above).
His Horus name Sehertawy (within a serek right)
had the meaning: "The one who makes the Two
Lands satis- fied". When he entered office the
two lands were divided and he set the task to
reunite them and make the Nile Valley a
prosperous land once again after a couple of
decades of anarchy and chaos in the
administration and finances. History tells he
made a good job, and one of his offsprings
finally succeeded a century later.
He started to subdue the towns in the neighborhood such as Hierakonpolis and
el-Kab to the south and Nagada, Koptos and Dendera to the north. The land
further downstream (north) was held by the kings of Herakleopolis, a town by the
border of the Faiyum basin in a distance of 600 km from Thebes.
The "Saff tomb" made by the Antefs I-III and the last kings of dynasty 11.
A courtyard was cut into the hillside ending with several tombs for the royal
During his reign of about 16 years of civil war (though with separated areas and a
visible front/border) Antef didn't manage to extend his small kingdom further and
this was the task and challenge he left for his son and successor. Since this son
of his had a reign of almost half a century, it's quite likely that Antef I died rather
young, hardly reaching his middle age.
He (and the two Antefs to come) was buried in a long, narrow rock cut tomb a so
called saff-tomb or row tomb (picture above). They were placed at the west bank
of Thebes at today's Dra Abu el-Naga 3 km east of Deir el-Bahri. The design was
unique with no known forerunner as prototype. It consisted of a big open "row"
or courtyard going in to the mountain side where it ended with several chambers
cut in to the sides.
They were probably made for the king's closest family members like consorts,
sisters, brothers, sisters in law etc. A notable fact is that the king's tomb (burial
chamber) was not significantly bigger than the others. A question is if the small
pyramids placed within the yards (indications tell of such buildings) could have
been the final resting places for the kings, but this is just a theory.
Antef II
Antef II was the second king of the 11th
dynasty and his Horus name Wah-ankh
(in the serek right) means "Strong in
life".
His mother was a certain Neferu, and
his reign was, according to the Turin
king list, 49 years long and dur- ing this
period he manage to consolidate his
territory to a great extent.
The rulers of the contempo- rary 9th
and 10th dynasties in middle and
northern Egypt were joining forces and
tried to take back the territory they had lost previously
to Antef I, and started to moved south towards Theban
dominated areas.
Antef II, who was ruling the 7 provinces in the south of the country, struck back,
and the front was moving many times from north to south before he finally
manage to drive his oponents as far north as a good stretch of valley north of
Abydos up to the 13th province right at today's Asyut. By doing so half of Upper
Egypt was in his hands, and the rest of his reign was peaceful. In the south he
Antef III
Antef III was the third king of the 11th Dynasty and very little is
known about what happened in the country during his brief reign of
around eight years. He is thereby the one less known about of the
three Antefs.
His long Horus name Nekhet-neb-tep-nefer (shown within a serek
at picture right) has the humble meaning: "Horus, The Victorious
One, Lord Of The Good Beginning".
The Royal canon of Turin gives him a reign of at least eight years,
though his name is lacking but fragment of a title is visible at the
row. It seems that during his reign a sort of status quo was at hand
in the country, because he did not gain nor lose any territory to his
northern enemies in the civil war, the kings of the 9-10 dynasties
from Herakleopolis.
He was probably buried in a narrow rock cut saff-tomb at Western
Thebes next to Antef II, 3 km east of Deir el-Bahri, the site where
his famous son and successor built himself a famous mortuary
complex. No proof has been found at the site to clearly identify the
tomb as his and the only real archaeo- logical evidence from him,
is a door jamb with his name within a royal cartouche found at Abydos.
He made his most resolute contribution to Egyptian history in cooperation with a
woman named Iah. Whether she was his first queen, a secondary consort or had
another status, we don't know. Anyhow - they produced the next king to be,
Mentuhotep II (below), one of the most distinguished kings ever in the Nile
Valley.
Even during the re-conquest of Egypt, Mentuhotep had built or restored several
monuments in Upper Egypt like those of Dendera, Abydos, el Kab and Elephan-
tine at Aswan. He paid special homage to Thebes's war-god Mentu, who had
helped him to accomplish his task, by adopting his name and build temples to
him at Medamud, Armant and Tod.
Mentuhotep III
Architecture and works of art were characterized by innovation during his reign
and the reliefs are known to have a quality not to be seen even during the Middle
Kingdom to come. At Medinet Habu he built a triple sanctuary for triads of gods.
At the "Thoth Hill" nearby he erected a small temple to the god Thoth (see picture
below) on the ground where a sanctuary from the first dynasty once had stood. In
its quite remote location it wasn't found until 1904. The crude quality complex is
made of mud brick and had once an entry with pylons and surrounding walls.
He began building his tomb near his father's monument at Deir el Bahri, but it was
unfinished when he died. It consists of a causeway and a sloping passage ending
a bit into the bedrock. Graffiti inscriptions in the vicinity indicate that his last
resting place still might be to be found nearby.
Considering the rather short time king Mentuhotep III had on the throne he must
have been a very ambitious ruler with monuments built all over the country, and
some of them were no doubt initiated by his predecessor, his father.
In one of the few depictions of him (a relief from Armant in picture above) he is
depicted as a young man wearing the traditional head-dress - the nemes, a
striped cloth which was worn exclusively by kings. In another depiction of him
(through menu left) he i wearing the red crown of Lower Egypt.
His throne name (within the cartouche at top right) means "The One Who Feeds
The Ka Of Re".
In the late 1990s was made an archaeology discovery which might solve the pro-
blem about where he was buried. A tomb which likely is his was found placed
right below the peak of the hill upon which his small sanctuary stood atop.
The fact that his tomb wasn't finished, though it ought to be if efforts had been
made, and the fact that very few depictions of him remain, and possibly never
was to be, makes one think that he was a ruler not eager to put his person at
front. He rather, it seems, at first hand saw to the results of his deeds and got
satisfaction through all building projects he fulfilled all over the country.
This gives the impression that Mentuhotep III was a modest man of great
wisdom.
Mentuhotep IV
At the very end of the eleventh dynasty the central power of Thebes seems to
have declined for a while, at least where the authority over the province of Nubia
was concerned. In nine cities an otherwise unknown "king" made his presence
known by recording his name on rocks. He had both a throne name - Kakare, and
a personal nomen - Antef. Maybe he was heading for the throne in Thebes but he
obviously did not reach that far.
Another ruler manifesting himself in Nubia was probably called Ibkhenetre and he
only showed himself with a fancy cartouche (below).
A third chief is known during the same period and he was called Segerseni with
the throne name Menkhkare. He is attested for only in rock inscriptions near the
town of Umbarakab in Lower Nubia.
We don't know if these local chiefs ruled simultaneously or if they succeeded
each other. Egyptologist von Beckerath advocates that their reigns were at the
same time ruling different parts of Nubia.
By Ottar Vendel
Dynasty 12
Manetho's list
This dynasty should bring back the values from the Old Kingdom with
divine kingship, but all in the minds of the pharaohs themselves.
Its glory lies in the fact that the rulers were able leaders
developing agricultural methods and exploiting
the Faiyum. They all tried to imitate the
great pharaohs from the passed.
Egypt was prosperous and
the era saw at least
seven more
pyramids.
Amenemhet I
Few monuments of his are located at Thebes and he abandoned his completed tomb there for a
pyramid at the new capital. The reason for this is a mystery to Egypto- logists and would later in
In his 29th year in office he strengthened trading and quarrying in Nubia to get raw materials and
metals and drove his army possibly as far south as the second cataract. He founded a fortress at
Semna in the same region.
Amenemhet started several building projects. Besides the fortresses he also built or restored
religious monuments at Babastis, el-Khatana, Tanis, Karnak, Koptos, Abydos, Dendera and at the
old capital Memphis, where he built a temple to the local god Ptah.
He appears to have been a wise leader, though hard, eager to protect Egypt's borders from
intruders. A literary work from the time of his successor tells that he was brutally murdered in a
harem plot. If ths is a tale without any connection to real history, is not known. Anyhow, this way
to depart from earthly life was unique for Egyptian pharaohs and he must have been a rather old
man by then, at least in his sixties.
Senwosret I
The valley temple is not exactly located and the long causeway, now hidden under the
sand, still (year 2010) awaits a proper investigation.
The inner enclosure wall was built of limestone and had panels every five meters decorated
with reliefs. A total of 150 were originally pre-sent topped with the king's names. The mortuary
temple was almost completely ruined when excavated in 1894. Its court yard had 24 pillars and
there was found a granite altar with inscriptions and reliefs. In its rear came to light the feet of a
statue that originally had shown the king about 2.7 meters tall.
Eight standing large statues, and a catch with ten more than life-size statues of pharaoh sitting on
a square block, have been found here.
The entrance to the pyramid's interior is located below the pavement of a little chapel on the north
side where a corridor made of granite goes down to the grave chamber passing a barrier of huge
blocks weighing 20 tons a piece.
This construction is today below ground water level and has never been entered by modern
archaeologists. In parallel corridor made by robbers, some items were found in the 1880s
including parts of wooden boxes, alabaster containers, a gold dagger sheath etc.
All subsidiary pyramids did not receive burials because some lack a grave chamber. These tombs
probably all belong to members of the royal family and some cases the owner has been identified.
One of these - Nofret I, the king's first queen and sister, had her name written within a cartouche.
This was the first time in Egyptian history that another person but the pharaoh had this privilege.
Amenemhet II
Amenemhet II started his reign by taking the Horus name
Hekenenmaat, meaning "The One Who is Praised By Maat" seen in
the serek in picture right.
He chose to build his pyramid at Dahshur in a lonely pyramid field
from the 4th Dynasty.
His monument was called "The Mighty Pyramid" and was placed
east of the Red Pyramid of Snofru. Today it's called "The White
Pyramid" and is in a ruined state and the side is estimated to have
had a length of about 53 meters.
Amenemhet The broad causeway is probably not investigated at all and the
valley temple is yet to be found at the old bank of the Nile just 250
meters from the complex. The mortuary temple is almost completely de- stroyed
and has not been properly examined.
Two tower-like structures like pylons are visible in the temple's east facade (see
picture below). The core of the pyramid was built much like that of his father's
but here the filling in-between the rough blocks was only sand. Hekenenmaat
His trade with foreign countries reach all over the known parts of the Wadj-wer (Great Green) as
the Egyptians called the Mediterranean Sea.
Pottery and commodities coming all the way from Crete and the Minoan islands are thus found
from his time in tombs and temples.
Though he wasn't making any military actions northwards, he kept his army in shape and had a
good watch for potential hostilities from Mesopotamia. Lucky for him the Babylonian state was
engaged in a prolonged conflict to the north with a growing warrior tribe later to be a real threat to
Egypt - The Assyrians.
Senwosret II
Pyramid of Senwosret II
at Lahun
Eight mastabas (brown) and
a minor pyramid was
situated by the north side
and instead of a mortuary
temple to the east a small
chapel was placed there.
Causeway and valley temple
have not been found so far
(2002) but may have once
been there and was later
dismantled for reusing, like
the pyramid's casing of fine
smooth white limestone.
Senwosret III
Senwosret III took office with the Horus name which means "Horus
Divine of Shape", seen in the serek in picture right. He had a long
and prosperous time on the throne and he was military active
during most of his reign. He is well attested for in many surviving
statues that during the Middle Kingdom were realistic how the king
should be portrayed. Thus we can se the pharaoh like he really was
- a mature man with an introvert and somewhat arrogant look on his
face seeming almost tired of all the responsibility his high position
has put on his shoulders (picture below left).
Senwosret He initiated a series of five campaigns into Nubia and protected the
trading routes and mineral resources and to make transport-ation
easy he extended an Old Kingdom bypass canal around the first cataract at
Aswan. In Semna he erected a stele bragging about how he killed the male
population, enslaved their women and children, burnt their crops and poisoned
their wells.
Neterikheperu
He personally lead a campaign into Syria, described on
a private stele by a participant as an invasion of plunder.
Senwosret III built a temple to the old Theban war god Mentu north of
Karnak and divided the country into three adminis- trative regions. This
was to weaken the power of the local governors who were a constant
threat to central power during most all the Middle Kingdom. As a side
effect of this the middle class grew larger and more politically
influential.
He built his pyramid at Dahshur. It was the largest of the 12th dynasty
pyramids and had a mud brick core cased by limestone. The entrance
was hidden under the courtyard pavement west of the pyramid and the
burial chamber does not lie close to the vertical axes (see illu- stration
below). Due to its position (like the one in his father's pyramid) there is a slight possibility that the
found chamber was for the first queen and the king's is yet to be found. When entered in the
1890s it contained a big empty granite sarco-phagus by its west wall and the only objects found
were a few vases and pieces of a bronze dagger with an ivory handle.
The location of the valley temple has never been retrieved and the causeway ap-proaching from
the southeast, has not yet been investigated (year 2002).
In the lower galleries under the small pyramids to the north 300 pieces of jewelry were found
belonging to princess Sit-Hathor, probably the king's sister and possibly also his wife. From the
western most of the tombs at the south side a tunnel leads to a burial chamber with a granite
sarcophagus under the corner of the king's pyramid (see illu- stration above). This was found in
1994 and belonged to his mother Weret.
If Senwosret ever was buried in his pyramid is doubtful because he also had a tomb at Abydos
with a similar layout as a pyramid complex. From a valley temple a 900 metre long causeway leads
to the mortuary temple within an enclosure area. The huge underground tomb was once
considered the largest in Egypt. To the south a town was built to support this huge funerary
complex.
Amenemhet III
Amenemhet
The king decided to build another pyramid to replace the cracked one, and chose the location
Hawara just at the entrance to great Faiyum basin.
It was also built in typical 12th Dynasty fashion with a mud brick core and a casing of white
limestone but was technically different to the one at Dahshur.
The whole complex was oriented north-south and surrounded by an enclosure wall covering some
28,000 square meters, the largest from the Middle Kingdom. The valley temple and the causeway,
have not been investigated seriously.
The huge mortuary complex (now gone) was once called "the Labyrinth" and well known to
tourists during the Greco-Roman era and is said to have been the prototype for its namesake later
built for king Minos in Crete. Historian Strabo tells the halls were as many as the provinces in
Egypt (42), each honoring its main god. Underground galleries for the local crocodile deity Sobek
is also mentioned, but they have never been found.
Pyramid at Hawara
After the dismantling of the fine
white casing stones the whole
Hawara pyramid has decayed
to a pile of mud brick rubble.
Under the sand are the scanty
remains of the attraction that
brought tourists here already in
Roman times - The Labyrinth.
This was the mortuary temple.
In 1889 the burial chamber was entered, but was found only to contain an empty sarcophagus.
Within the nearby antechamber was found duck shaped bowls, a wooden coffin and an alabaster
Amenemhet IV
Amenemhet IV had the Horus name Kheperkheperu which means
"Horus (is) the Multiple Transformer", seen within the serek in
picture right.
He was probably a son of his predecessor and had a brief period
as pharaoh of about ten years at the most.
He was married to his half sister (below) and possibly built a
pyramid at Mazghuna. No name of his has been found at the site
and the estimated age of the monu- ment has been made by
looking at the architectural and technical details.
Amenemhet We do not know anything about his relatives like the names of his
mother, sisters and brothers, or for that matter the true confirm- ation of the
identity of his father. There is a possibility that his pre- decessor on the throne
was his uncle or even his grandfather.
He is known to have completed several temples and other buildings which were
under construction when he entered office. In Nubia rock inscriptions confirm Kheperkheperu
that he was able to hold the territory that was captured by the Egyptian army almost a hundred
years earlier, during the reign of king Senwosret III.
Nothing is known of a heir of his (if there was one) and the fact that he was suc-ceeded by his
widow indicates that he had no son to put on the throne.
An example from the sparse remains of his is a magnificent piece of jewelry shown in the
illustration below.
Up to now (year 2002) no depictions in paintings and reliefs etc. has been found showing the
looks of Amenemhet IV. Nor is there any statue or statuette that can be attested to him with
Sobeknefrure
Sobeknefrure (sometimes Neferusobek) had the Horus name
Merire which means "Horus, [who is] Beloved by Re", seen in
the serek in picture right. Her throne name (seen within the
cartouche left) means "Three times Beautiful is Sobek", by this
praising the crocodile god from the Faiyum. The two
hieroglyphs at the bottom mark that this is a name of a woman.
She was most likely a daughter of Amenemhet III and is
mentioned in Manetho's text, in the Karnak and Sakkara lists
but not noted in the canon from Abydos temple wall.
She was probably the sister or half sister to her husband
Amenemhet IV whose title and occu-pation she took over
shortly after his death. Often her name app- ears with the
addition Shedty, meaning "from Shedet" and this might indicate
that she was involved in a religious movement in this town in Meritre
Sobeknefrure Faiyum. This cult praised the crocodile god Sobek and it's
possible, though not confirmed, that priests of this old local deity were the ones
who backed her up as a national leader though their power (and hers) obviously was limited. This
would also explain her break of tradition by taking the name aof the crocodile god Sobek as
pharaoh for the first time in Egyptian history. After her a row of kings did so due to the upraise of
this animal from the swamps of Faiyum where it was more common than along the shores of the
Nile itself.
Dynasty 13
1802 - 1649 BC (Ryholt) (c. 140 years)
Known only from Upper Egypt and NOT present in the Turin Canon are:
Mentuhotep VI, Djehuty, Neferhotep III, Nebiryraw I, Smenre, Bebiankh, Snaaib, Monthemsaf,
Senwosret IV, Nebmaatre, Dedumose I-II, Wepwawemsaf, Pantjeny.
Sobekhotep I
The founder of the dynasty is well attested for and he was the
first (male) pharaoh to include Faiyum's crocodile god into his
name. He was the son of king Amenemhet IV of dynasty 12 and
is incorrectly noted as king number 19 in the Turin Canon,
obvious interchanged with king Wegaf in position #21 who was
ruling in about forty years later.
The duration of his reign is not to be seen in the damaged list,
but a probable figure is estimated for at least three a period of
years around 1800-1797 BC. His prenomen (seen within the
cartouche in picture right) means: "Life of Re is Appearing",
made thru the three hieroglyphs: sunrise (mean- ing "appear"),
ankh ("life") and the sun, standing for the solar god Re. His
name occurs on at least a dozen remnants from buildings of
stone plus some papyrus inscriptions and an axe blade of
Sobekhotep unknown provenance. Khaankhre
Sekhemkare Sonbef
King Sekhemkare Sonbef was a son of Amenemhet III and by some considered identical to
Amenemhet Sonbef
Sekhemkare Seankhtawy
Amenemhet V
Amenyqemau
King Amenyqemau had a brief reign of a few years
around 1790 BC. By coincident he was re- discovered and
came to be known better some 3,750 years later - in 1957.
While working at South Dashur an American expedition tried
their luck by excavating a low structure of mud brick rubble
never worked on before. Soon they discovered a substructure
that made them determine that this was a true pyra- mid, until
then unknown to science.
The owner was soon identified as king Ameny Kemau (usualy
today written Amenyqemau), a little known ruler from the 13th
dynasty, and hard to place in the long line of minor regents
from this dusky period. In the Turin Canon appears a pharaoh
called Se-hotep-ib-Re with a noted reign of just one year,
which may be him. Another suggestion is that he was the son
of (and perhaps predecessor to) pharaoh Amenemhet V, but
this has not been confirmed, but it might be possible.
Ameni Kemau His name (in the picture right) clearly confirms his status by Nefer-netjer
the signs at the very bottom (the goose and the sun) which neb-tauy
says: "Son of Re", meaning nobody but the king. And in the picture left his
personal name is seen within a royal cartouche.
Pyramid of Amenyqemau
The entrance to the substructure
was made in a fashion well known
from the mid dynasty 13.
A huge block of stone (green) was
a stopper at the threshold of the
buri- al chamber (red).
Nothing was found of any mortuary
temple, causeway or valley temple.
It's doubtful if there ever were any
built and if the pyramid itself was
ever finished.
The base side was originally about
52 meters and the height about 35.
The entrance corridor (picture above) was at the east side, and had two stairways before entering
the large antechamber outside the grave chamber holding a huge block of quartzite stone. Into
this craftsmen had cut two niches for the storage of the king's mummy coffin and the chest
containing four jars with his embalmed inner organs. After the burial a big stone slab outside the
door was put into place blocking the entrance to pharaoh's final resting place.
Despite these precautions taken by the architect, the monument was entered by grave robbers
who ransacked it of its valuable things leaving only fragments of the canopy chest behind. Luckily
for the afterworld it was on these pieces of stone that the king's name was found some 3,700
years later (the serek-pictures above left).
The pyramid of Amenyqemau was one of the last monumental pyramid for a king's final resting
place to be built in Egypt, and as such it is a valuable object for studying the long development of
this famous type of tomb.
Sobekhotep II
Hor I
King Hor
Wegaf
Pharaoh Wegaf (also spelt Ugaf) is in most lists put in first
position of the dynasty with a reign of about a good two years
around 1765 BC. The Turin Canon gives him - two years, three
months and twenty-seven days on the throne.
He is likely to have ruled from the capital Itj-tawy as the first in
a row of about ten kings who had rather stable rules. His throne
name (within cartouche right) means: "Re Protects the Two
Lands", and sometimes the signs at row three and at the
bottom are left out. At left his per-sonal name Wegaf is seen
written with phonetic hieroglyphs.His remains are rather few (7)
and just a single scarab-seal is documented from his time as
the senior commander of Egypt's military forces before he
became pharaoh.
Wegaf Khwitawyre
Khendjer
Nothing is known of the deeds of this pharaoh. His fame comes
from his mortuary complex with his pyramid which was
discovered at far south in the burial ground of Sakkara in 1929,
and was identified as his two years later.
His name was known before, from a stele, but here another
throne name was used. For some time the question was if there
were two kings called Khendjer, but soon scientists agreed on
that it was one and the same pharaoh from the stele found at
Sakkara and the one possibly mentioned in the Canon of Turin.
His Horus name "Djed Kheperu" (firm is Kheper) is seen within
a serek right, and his reign would have lasted circa 4 years
around 1750 BC.
The whole pyramid area of his had once been enclosed by two
walls, the outer made of mud brick. The inner one was of
limestone and had niches and panels and remains indicated it Khendjer
apparently had replaced an unusual wavy wall, just like the one surrounding the
pyramid at Mazghuna South from king Amenemhet IV around half a century earlier (see above).
The mortuary temple was located on the east side between the walls and the only remains were
bits of reliefs and parts of the pavement from the court yard. Luckily fragments from columns
were inscribed with his name, and thereby identifying the constructions as his. Investigations of
the fragmentary pyramid lead to the conclu-sion that it once had a base side of 53 meters and a
height of about 37. After having been quarried away over the years it is considerably reduced in
height today (2002). Compared to what it once had looked like in its prime. Many fragments of the
black granite pyramidon (capstone) was found in a rather well preserved condition at the east side
and is now reconstructed (put together). It's inscribed with the king's throne name - Userkare. A
chapel to the north was built against the pyramid's facade. It stood on a platform and was reached
by two stairways.
Fragments of reliefs that once adorned the walls have been found, depicting scenes of offerings
and other well known motifs. The entrance was at the west side (picture above) with a stairway
leading down to a portcullis that never was engaged and 39 steps further down was a room with
stopper number two. Prior to the superstructure the grave chamber was built in a shaft cut out in
the bedrock. Huge blocks were sealing it from the top and lowered to their final position by a
devise making them fall into place when the sand they temporary lay on was drained out from
below through small channels. This technically advanced method is also known from the pyramid
remains at Mazghuna South attributed to Amenemhet IV (see above).
Just outside the inner wall at the north west corner are the underground remains of a small (c. 20
m square) subsidiary pyramid possibly built for his first queen. Within the area are also shaft
tombs most likely belonging to other family members. All of it was found in an unfinished state
when it was discovered in the late 1920s, and poss-ibly never used for burials. An inscription on
the sarcophagus in the grave chamber below the queen's pyramid, gives an indication of the
duration of the king's short reign - four years. Apart from his tomb all remains left of pharaoh
Khendjer are three statuettes of him, three cylinder seals with his name, a few scarab seals and a
stele.
If Khendjer was coming from outside Egypt (and his Semitic name indicates this) he may have
been the first recognised Pharaoh of non-Egyptian origin.
Sobekhotep III
Neferhotep I
Neferhotep is the first king in a row of several bearing this
rather odd name meaning "Beauty and satisfaction" and he
was an elder brother to the next king: Sobekhotep IV.
The hieroglyph for satisfaction is a loaf of bread on a reed mat
(cartouche left) indicating the serious- ness the Egyptians had
in their relation to food.
He is listed as number 27 in the Turin Canon and noted to have
been in office almost a dozen years around 1742-1731 BC. His
throne name (within the cartouche in the picture right) means:
"Mighty is the Appear-ance of Re". Neferhotep I came from a
military family of none royal stock (at least on his father's side)
and possibly from Thebes. The name of his first queen is
known as Senebsen and they likely resided in the main capital
from witch the king ruled the country - Itjtawy, situated near
Neferhotep Lisht by the Fayum basin in Middle Egypt. Khasekhemre
Knowledge about his deeds could be better but artifacts from his reign are many and on Sehel
island at Aswan his name is cut into the rocks in seven occasions. He has left two stelae from
Abydos made in his second and forth year in office and another has been found at Byblos in
Lebanon. His scarab-seals are more than 60 and two cylinders seals are known. Three statues of
him have survived - one at Elefantine in Aswan and two from the Karnak temple area at Thebes.
His successor was his younger brother Sobek- hotep IV (below) and they might also have ruled
together because many monument have both their names inscribed.
Sobekhotep IV
In the Turin Canon Sobekhotep IV is listed in position 21.
His throne name (within the car- touche in the picture
right) was Kha- ineferre meaning: "The Beautiful
Appearance of Re".
He was one of the most powerful kings of the dynasty and
is known to have secured the southern frontier by
sending troops down into Nubia, i.e. below the Egyptian
south border.
His reign (and his brother's before him) can be considered
as the peak of the 13th dyna- sty, which was a rather
shaky and politically troublesome period. Luckily there is
a fine unbroken statue left of him showing his looks
(picture left). He is sitting on his throne and his face is
made in typical Middle Kingdom style with big ears
pointing out. This unique piece is today to be seen at the Kha inefer re
Louvre Museum in Paris.
He was a younger brother to Neferhotep I whom he succeed- ed on the
throne. Their father was a priest and their mother was possibly of royal
stock and if so possibly a (grand?) grandchild of Amenemhet III from
dynasty 12. His queen was called Tjan and has left an inscription (probably
made after her husbands death) where she tells how he went to Heliopolis
and studied the old scripts and took a statue of the god Osiris in a
procession. It ended in the old capital down at Abydos in the so called
"Osiris' Tomb", where the priests performed the well known story of his
deeds. The duration of his reign is not noted in the Turin Canon, but is
estimated to have been a dozen years around 1732-1720 BC. During his
reign the Hyksos made their first appearance, and took control of the town
Sobekhotep VI
Pharaoh Sokbekhotep VI had the throne name Khahotep
Re (within the cartouche right), with the meaning: Perfect
In Appear- ence is Re". He was a ruler from Thebes and
probably the son of his predecessor with the same name
(and number 5) who is known to have a son bearing this
name.
His time in office was not very long and his reign as ruler
number 25 of this dynasty is estimated to a period of
about five years (the Turin Canon says four) around the
period 1720-1715 BC.
Little to nothing is known about his deeds and the only
remnant of substance left from his time on the throne
besides some (10) scarab seals, (including impressions
and a cylinder ditto), is a statuette found in Kerma in Nubia, now in the Museum
in Berlin (seen in picture left). This find indicates that Egypt though week, had Khahotepre
influence possibly next to control over this remote region known for its own
identity and struggle for independence throughout the long Egyptian history.
Wahibre
Pharaoh Wahibre (meaning "Re Is Strong Of Heart") had the
personal nomen Iaib (also Ib- iaw) as seen in the cartouche
right. He is noted in the Turin Canon as the 29th ruler and with
a possible additional four king in a damage part of the papyrus
earlier in the dynasty, he may have entered the throne as
number 33 in suc-cession.
With his successor Aya he is ending a line of kings with well
attested rather long reigns and the followers all are estimated
for very short periods on the throne.
From his almost eleven years in office (10 years, 8 months and
29 days in Turin Canon) around the years 1712-1701 BC. some
remains are left that confirms his existence and they are: 1)
Nine scarab-seals of
which one was found in Byblos (Lebanon). 2) Three cylinder-
Iaib (Ibiaw) seals. 3) A bead and stamp seal(?) with his name found at Wahibre
Lisht. 4) A cup from Kahun. 5) A stele of unknown provenance
now in the British Museum.
Seal of Wahibre
Dedumes I (Dedumose I)
Pharaoh Dedumose I had the throne name: Djed-hotep-Re
(seen within the cartouche left) meaning "The One Bringing
Lasting Peace".
He is known from Manetho's historical work as the king who
had to give up his country to the attacking Hyksos people. In
this chronicle he is given his Greek name Totemaios.
For some unknown reason he is not present in the Turin Canon
and is only attested for by remains from Upper Egypt, but this
doesn't mean that the invasion scenario told about him
(starting in Lower Egypt) is not a fact. There might have been
more than one ruler at the time and a king with the same name
and given the number II (two) has initiated a discussion about
his true position in the 13th dynasty.
Danish Egyptologist Kim Ryholt has (1997) in his work about
Djedhotepre this period put him in the 16th dynasty in a place not to be Dedumes
determined in the sequence of names. This lack of agreement
among the experts is due to the fact that at least three (by some scholars up to five) dynasties
were operating at the same time in the split up Egypt. (See textlink "Second Intermediate Period"
at dynasty 13 above).
Dynasty 14
1750 - c. 1670 BC. (c. 85 years)
Egypt was now split up and dynasty 14 (parallel at least to the mid 13th) was ruling from Xois in
the north eastern delta and was (at least indicated by some names) of Asiatic (Hyksos) origin. The
Canon of Turin note 32 names in a list which has space (rows) for about 60. Several lists and
theories are at hand, like suggestions that they were province leaders, vassals, made up, or
ancestors(!) to the living pharaohs.
Schloars of today (year 2002) distribute some names among all dynasties 13-15.
Manetho (through Africanus) writes that 76 kings ruled for 184 years.
The duration of their reigns indicate about two years each on the throne in average, and these
unlikely figures still awaits an explanation.
Just a few kings from dynasty 14 are known from seals in shapes of scarabs (see picture), and
besides Nehesy's below the only remain of substance is a stone stele.
Hyksos Period
By Ottar Vendel
Dynasty 15
Six Hyksos kings ruled for 108 years c. 1655 - 1547 BC.
This is the pure Hyksos dynasty also called "The Great". Turin Canon has six
lines with only fragments of figures from their reigns and a summation of 108
years. Manetho (Africanus) has also six names: Saites, Bnon, Pachnan, Staan,
Archles and Aphophis. They are noted for very long reigns and a duration for the
dynasty for 250 years, but today a figure around 100 years is generally agreed
on.
One theory states that at least 3 of the first kings ruled for almost 30 years and
were followed by Khyan and Apepi who hade reigns of about 40 years each. At
the very end Khamudi should have been just a year on the throne before he was
defeated by the Egyptian army and driven out of the country. The text below is a
general proposal based upon conclusions from scholars over the years. In 1997
the Danish Egyptologist Kim Ryholt suggested a short chronology for the
Salitis
Manetho writes that king Salitis (also called
Saites) conquered Egypt when it was ruled by
pharaoh Tutimaios, that is Dedumose I of
dynasty 13. A king with the name amu- qenu
appears in the Canon of Turin and he might be
the same ruler, possibly.
When they founded the first Hyksos dynasty it
is clear that this Asian people had been
nomading in the country (the Delta) for a good
many years. He resided in Memphis and is
credited for making Avaris the new capital and
fortified stronghold. This event was at hand at
the ver middle of the 1600s BC, when he had
been in office for about five years. The
Sark (Salk) northern part of Egypt was now to be ruled by Sehaenre
Hyksos until the end of their era some 110
years later. His reign is estimated to have been about 8 years around 1655-1647
BC.
Manetho gives him 19 years on the throne and he is usually identified with a king
called Sark (or Salk) mentioned only once in a list made by priests from Memphis
(cartouche above left). An attached throne name, Se-ha-en-Re (cartouche above
right), means - "The one introduced by Re", might be his. Remnants from his
reign are few, only his name written on three occasions on blocks of stone taken
from larger monuments. Where these originally stood is not known.
Sheshi
Seal of Sheshi
Yakub-Her
King Yakub-Her's throne name (seen within a
cartouche in picture to the right) means -
"Strong is the Love of Re".
Practically nothing is known from the reign of
this king (sometimes called Yakobner) and it's
doubtful if he has left any remain beside being
mentioned in king list written 1500 years after
his time on the throne.
His Aramean name is related to the biblical
Jacob, and has made some groups see this as
"evidence" that the Hyksos people were the
Israelites. This theory has of course no
scientific value. He is by some thought to fit
into one of the gaps in the 14th dynasty along
Yakub-Her with some 11 other rulers with Hyksos names Meruserre
not present in the Canon of Turin. He seems in
that case to place at the end of that dynasty, and if he is from dynasty 15 his
reign might be 8 years around 1634-1626 BC. His remains are from scarab-seals
only (about two dozens) found mostly in Egypt, but also a few from Palestine and
a single one from Nubia in the south.
Khyan
Khyan Seuserenre
Apepy (Apophis)
This ruler is well attested for and he was
probably the one who had the longest reign of
all Hyksos kings. Manetho (by Flavius) gives
him a reign of a good 36 years and today's
Egyptologist up to 42 around 1600-1559 BC.
His personal nomen Apepy (Greek: Apopis)
was possibly taken from the wicked Egyptian
god Apep (a gigantic mean ser-pent) and his
throne name (seen within a cartouche in the
picture right) can be read - [I am] "Great and
Powerful Like Re".
Apepi is mentioned in two papyri, a list from
priests in Memphis and many pieces of
architecture which give the names of his
Apepy sisters Tani and Tcharydjet and daughter Auserre
Harta. There is strong indications pointing to
the fact that he was an usurper with no relation to the rulig line of Hyksos kings
(his name was Egyptian) or domestic royalty. He is believed to have been a well
educated ruler who got into war in his older days, possibly tricked by forces
within his own government. He didn't improve his relationship with his southern
neighbor the Egyptian king Tao II in Thebes by sending him a very provocative
letter (today in the British Museum) where he has a complaint which was, so say
the least, really odd.
Khamudy
Khamudy was the king who concluded the
Hyksos period in Egypt. Manetho calls him
Assis (Aseth) or Archles, and gives him a rule
of 49 years but today (2006) his reign is
estimated to have been a period of 10-12 years
around 1558-1547 BC.
He was militarily defeated and eventually had
to withdraw his people from the Nile Valley
after living there for generations.
His possible throne name was Ib-Hetep-Re,
(as seen within a cartouche in picture left) and
is not connected to him with certainty.
The Egyptian king Ahmose from Thebes
started a full scale war against him in year 11
Ib-hetep-re of his reign and after that the big town of Khamudy
Heliopolis was captured. He then saw the
beginning of the end to the long Hyksos rule. In the year after Khamudy
negotiated with the Egyptians about the withdrawal of the Hyksos army from his
capital Avaris and most of the Delta, but the determined Egyptians didn't take his
Dynasty 16
1663 - 1555 BC (108 years)
alt. 1660 - 1580 BC (80 years)
This dynasty is either thought to have been ruling as vassals to the Hyksos
dyna-sty 15 and then located around the town of Pelusium in the eastern Delta
(the traditional theory), or being an independent line of Egyptian kings ruling
from Thebes in the far south and finally taken over by the Hyksos for a short
period, (the more recent theory). The latter point of view combined with a parallel
dyn-asty at the neighboring Abydos makes it possible to deal with more known
kings as possible candidates. If the latest theory is correct the two rulers with
foreign sounding names presented below should be put in another dynasty.
In 1997 the Danish scientist Kim Ryholt suggested a choronology for dynasty
16.
The Canon of Turin has 15 lines for this dynasty with 7 names partly visible and
large gaps. Those readable are considered to be, in sequence:
Sekhemresementawy Djehuty, Sekhemresewosretawy Sobekhotep III, Sekhem-
resankhtawy Neferhotep III, Sankhenre Menthotepi, Sewadjenre Nebiryraw I,
Nebiryraw II, Semenre, Sewoserenre Bebiankh, Sekhemreshedwaset.
Then follow five rows with lost names and in this position fits a group of kings
well known but not placed. These are (according to the Abydos theory):
Dedumose I-II, Mentuemsaf, Mentuhotep VI, Senwosret IV.
These five names are pressed into the last less than ten years of the dynasty
thought to have been around the 1560s BC. Manetho writes that the Hyksos
invaded Egypt when king Tutimaios (Dedumose I) sat on the throne. When he
studied the old files, 1 300 years had passed since the Hyksos era.
User-anat, Semqen, Zaket, Wasa, Qar, Pepi III, Nebmaatre, Nikare II, Aahotepre,
Aaneterire, Nubankhre, Nubuserre, Khauserre, Khamure, Yoam, Amu
and possibly others.
Two rulers are presented below and they both have hyksos names.
Yakbim (Yacobaam)
This king had a West Semitic (Ammorite)
name like his predecessor and there are
different ways to transcribe the sounds. Two
other suggestions: Yakbemu and Jacbaam.
His name has not been found on bigger
artifacts like stelae or rests of buildings, only on small scarab-seals. On the other
hand they are as many as at least 112 with his name written on them and found
in a wide geographical area from deep down in Lower Nubia in the south (2) to
Palestine in the north (7). The remaining 103 are all of unknown provenance like
the only cylinder seal known of him. A fair guess might be that the bulk of them
have their origin in Egypt itself.
He's not on Manetho's list and has been identified, with rather fair accuracy, by
the throne name (prenomen) Sekhaenre. His reign was of unknown duration in
around 1560-1565 BC.
According to the modern theory that dynasty 16 was an Egyptian line of kings
from Thebes, Yakbim with his foreign name must be placed elsewhere, maybe
among the first five kings in the 14th dynasty where the Turin Papyrus seems to
have a large piece missing.
1 Woser(...)re ...
2 Woser(...)re ...
3-10 Names lost. ...
11 (...)hebre ...
12-14 Names lost. 2, 2, 4 years
15 (...)hebre? 3-4 years
16 (...)webenre 3-4 years
1) Wepwawemsaf Sekhemreneferkhaw
2) Pantjeny Skhemrekhutawy
3) Snaaib Menkhawre
Dynasty 17
c. 1660-1560 BC. or c. 1580-1550 BC.
From Thebes the kings controlled southern Egypt independent of the Hyksos in
the north. Between them might have been another line of rulers for some time
(the Abydos Dynasty). It seems to have been peaceful period for most of a
century until a 17th dynasty king started a war to "liberate" the rest of the
country. This was achieved after campaigns in periods over about 20 years.
The pharaohs had new designed so called saff- or row-tombs in the hillside at
Dra Abu el-Naga in Western Thebes, possibly with small (8-15 meters square)
sharp agled pyramids built in the enclosed yards. Today (2001) almost nothing is
left but crude remains of their grave chambers in the hillside. In 1997 the Danish
Egyptologist Kim Ryholt suggested a chronology for dynasty 17.
The nine kings below written in blue text are the ones most known.
Rahotep
Rahotep (his throne name is seen within the
cartouche left) was likely the one who found- ed
the seventeenth dynasty at Thebes, when Egypt
was ruled by multiple kings and dyna-sties
governing different areas. The political situation
was (simplified) that different weak Egyptian
kings tried to maneuver against the recently
invaded Hyksos. At the far south the area
controlled by Thebes stood firm while the
others gradually were overrun.
Rahotep is well known in this respect as the one
who restored the damaged walls of the Temple
of Abydos to increase the city's capa-bility to
Sekhemrewahkhaw repel the expect attacks from the Hyksos Rahotep
advancing upstream from the north. A stele from Koptos tells that he also made
restorations of the local Min temple. A private stele bears his name as do some
scarab amulets. Historians have agreed on that this period, though its unstable
politically situation, was a peaceful and rather flourishing period de- spite what
some kings may have stated. This is probably following the tradition to make
themselves great leaders (and bold warriors) like the kings from the past.
Sobekemsaf I
Antef VIII
Sobekemsaf II
Sekhemre
Shedtawy
Tao I (Siamun?)
The birth name of king Tao (in picture left) is
by some scholars questioned to be his, but
his throne name Sa-nakht-en-re (within the
cartouche in the right picture) is clearly
established. It means: "[I am] Perpetuated like
Re".
The name form Ta is used by Egyptolo-gists
since the 1980s but if it's proper for this king
is far from sure, but the name sound-ing like
Siamun plus his name to the right is clear.
Thus it's quite possible that there never was a
Tao the 1st and the only pha- raoh who held
this name is the well att- ested follower below.
If this ruler was re- lated (some say father) to
Tao I the king Tao II coming next, is anybody's Senakhtenre
guess. Those in favor have a queen to him
called Tetisheri who then would be the mother to a new ruling family, unrelated
to the Antefs.
Not very much (i.e. nothing) is known from his rule but three remnants are known
Kamose
A valuable historical record for understanding this period is the fact that Kamose
made several stelae telling about his victories on the battlefield and is attested
for by items in his secondary tomb at Dra Abu el-Naga. Among the objects are a
famous ceremonial axe head, scarabs seals, pedants and jewelry.
His follower on the throne was his brother (or possibly nephew) Ahmose I who
"liberated" Egypt after an additional dozen years of combat.
This ruler was the founder of a new dynasty (the 18th), and he would start the
golden era in Egyptian history called - The New Kingdom but that's another
story.
Comments
on dynasties 13-17
This period is by far the most dusky in Egyptian history and many attempts have
been made to stow all kings (names) from dynasties 13-14 into the limited space
of time available. It's tempting to suggest more parallel dynasties to swallow
them all up like Ryholt in 1997 suggesting an Abydos dynasty. But he claims
dynasties 16 and 17 to have been in succession and no exra space is thus given.
Many names are still (year 2008) not possible to put in sequence or dynasty, and
various king lists made by scholars have their own solutions. Suggestions
(mostly from early Egyptology in the late 1800s) have tried to eliminate many