Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
BioOne (www.bioone.org) is a nonprofit, online aggregation of core research in the biological, ecological, and
environmental sciences. BioOne provides a sustainable online platform for over 170 journals and books published
by nonprofit societies, associations, museums, institutions, and presses.
Your use of this PDF, the BioOne Web site, and all posted and associated content indicates your acceptance of
BioOnes Terms of Use, available at www.bioone.org/page/terms_of_use.
Usage of BioOne content is strictly limited to personal, educational, and non-commercial use. Commercial inquiries
or rights and permissions requests should be directed to the individual publisher as copyright holder.
BioOne sees sustainable scholarly publishing as an inherently collaborative enterprise connecting authors, nonprofit publishers, academic institutions, research
libraries, and research funders in the common goal of maximizing access to critical research.
J. Parasitol., 90(4), 2004, pp. 845852
q American Society of Parasitologists 2004
ABSTRACT: A capture enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) using a new monoclonal antibody (mAb MM3) is reported
for the detection of Fasciola hepatica excretorysecretory antigens (ESAs) in feces of infected hosts. The mAb MM3 was
produced by immunization of mice with a 7- to 40-kDa purified and O-deglycosylated fraction of F. hepatica ESAs, which has
previously been shown to be specific for the parasite. The specificity and sensitivity of the MM3 capture ELISA were assessed
using feces from sheep and cattle. Sheep feces were obtained from a fluke-free herd (with most animals harboring other nematodes
and cestodes), from lambs experimentally infected with 540 F. hepatica metacercariae and in some cases treated with tricla-
bendazole at 14 wk postinfection (PI), and from uninfected control lambs. Cattle feces were collected at the slaughterhouse from
adult cows naturally infected with known numbers of flukes (from 1 to 154) or free of F. hepatica infection (though in most
cases harboring other helminths). The MM3 capture ELISA assay had detection limits of 0.3 (sheep) and 0.6 (cattle) ng of F.
hepatica ESA per milliliter of fecal supernatant. The assay detected 100% of sheep with 1 fluke, 100% of cattle with 2 flukes,
and 2 of 7 cattle with 1 fluke. The false-negative animals (5/7) were probably not detected because the F. hepatica individuals
in these animals were immature (511 mm in length). As expected, coproantigen concentration correlated positively (r 5 0.889;
P , 0.001) with parasite burden and negatively (r 5 0.712; P , 0.01) with the time after infection at which coproantigen was
first detected. Nevertheless, even in animals with low fluke burdens (136 parasites), the first detection of F. hepaticaspecific
coproantigens by the MM3 capture ELISA preceded the first detection in egg count by 15 wk. In all sheep that were experi-
mentally infected and then untreated, coproantigen remained detectable until at least 18 wk PI, whereas in sheep that were
experimentally infected and then flukicide treated, coproantigen became undetectable from 1 to 3 wk after treatment. None of
the fecal samples from sheep or cattle negative for fascioliasis but naturally infected with other parasites including Dicroelium
dendriticum showed reactivity in the MM3 capture ELISA. These results indicate that this assay is a reliable and ultrasensitive
method for detecting subnanogram amounts of F. hepatica antigens in feces from sheep and cattle, facilitating early diagnosis.
Fascioliasis is a zoonotic disease caused by Fasciola spp., 2001). Alternatively, active infections by Fasciola spp. can be
trematode parasites that infect a wide range of mammals diagnosed using immunological tests for the detection of met-
throughout the world. The prevalence of infection is often high abolic products of flukes located in liver bile ducts, which are
in sheep and cattle, probably because of close contact with in- released and passed into feces. Together with the fact that large-
fective metacercariae on pasture and a high sensitivity to infec- scale fecal sampling is evidently easier than large-scale blood
tion. Consequently, fascioliasis causes major economic losses sampling, this meant that research has focused on the devel-
in many countries. opment of enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) tests
One of the main problems in the control of this disease is for the detection of parasite antigens in host stools, i.e., co-
the lack of sensitive and convenient tests for the diagnosis of proantigens.
Fasciola spp. infection in large herds under field conditions and Using capture ELISA tests based on polyclonal antibodies
for monitoring the efficacy of flukicide treatments. Diagnosis raised against whole ESAs, it has been proved possible to detect
of animal fascioliasis is largely based on microscopic demon- F. hepatica coproantigens in experimentally infected sheep (Al-
stration of parasite ova in feces, but Fasciola spp. egg shedding mazan et al., 2001) and rats (Paz-Silva et al., 2002). The spec-
is intermittent and irregular and does not begin until 1012 wk ificity of these tests was not evaluated in depth, but it can be
postinfection (PI) or later (Zimmerman et al., 1982). Besides expected to be low because some polypeptides present in whole
its low sensitivity, which can result in underdiagnosis of weak F. hepatica ESA preparations are shared by other helminths
infections (Conceicao et al., 2002), coproscopy is a laborious commonly present in the digestive tract of grazing ruminants.
technique requiring each sample to be examined individually In addition, antisera produced in this way show considerable
by trained personnel so that it is not suitable for analyzing large among-batch variability so that results may vary substantially
herds. from batch to batch. In contrast, monoclonal antibody technol-
Immunological techniques using selected excretorysecreto- ogy produces reagents with well-defined affinity and specificity
ry antigens (ESA) from Fasciola spp. allow the detection of and enables production of large quantities with homogeneous
specific antiparasite circulating antibodies within 35 wk of the quality. Several monoclonal antibodies have been raised against
infection (Mezo et al., 2003) and can readily be automated. F. hepatica ESAs and somatic antigens (Hanna and Trudgett,
Nevertheless, obtaining sera is difficult with large herds, and 1983; Hanna et al., 1988; Solano et al., 1991), but to our knowl-
tests of this type are of limited diagnostic value in endemic edge, only 2 have been reported to date as useful for the de-
areas because antibody titers remain at high levels even when tection of coproantigens in humans and animals with fascioli-
animals have been successfully treated (Sanchez-Andrade et al., asis. One monoclonal antibody (mAb) named F10 (Abdel-Rah-
man et al., 1998, 1999) was reported to specifically identify
feces from calves with 10 or more flukes, whereas mAb ES78
Received 23 July 2003; revised 4 November 2003; accepted 4 No- (Espino and Finlay, 1994; Dumenigo et al., 1996, 2000; Espino
vember 2003.
* Laboratorio de Parasitologa, Facultad de Farmacia, Universidad de
and Dumenigo, 2003) specifically identified 100% of feces from
Santiago de Compostela, 15782 Santiago de Compostela, Spain. calves with 5 or more flukes. However, ES78 was not tested in
To whom correspondence should be addressed. animals with very low parasite burdens, i.e., less than 5 flukes.
845
846 THE JOURNAL OF PARASITOLOGY, VOL. 90, NO. 4, AUGUST 2004
In this report, we describe a capture ELISA assay using a new Affinity chromatography with the monoclonal antibody MM3
monoclonal antibody (MM3, IgG1/k) that detects specific F. The F. hepatica ESAs recognized by the MM3 mAb were purified
hepatica ESA coproantigens in feces from sheep with 1 fluke by affinity chromatography with the mAb immobilized on a HiTrap
and cattle with 12 flukes. This MM3 capture ELISA is much NSH-activated HP column (Amersham Biosciences), according to the
suppliers instructions. Fasciola hepatica ESAs (1.2 mg/ml) were ap-
more sensitive than previously described assays. plied to the affinity column previously equilibrated with PBS, and the
unbound fraction was washed through with 10 bed volumes of PBS.
MATERIALS AND METHODS Bound proteins were eluted with 0.1 M glycineHCl, pH 2.5, then neu-
tralized with Tris, dialyzed against PBS, and concentrated by ultrafil-
Fasciola hepatica ESAs
tration using Centricon YM-10 centrifugal filter devices (Millipore Cor-
Fasciola hepatica ESAs were obtained as described previously poration).
(Mezo et al., 2003). In brief, live adult flukes collected from bile ducts
of naturally infected cows were washed, first in sterile saline solution Immunoblotting
containing antibiotics (100 IU/ml penicillin and 100 mg streptomycin)
and glucose (2 mg/ml) at 38 C and then in Roswell Park Memorial The F. hepatica antigens obtained by MM3 affinity chromatography
Institute (RPMI) cell culture medium (RPMI 1640 supplemented with were separated by polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis under reducing
20 mM N-2-hydroxyethylpiperazine-N9-2-ethanesulfonic acid, 0.3 g/L conditions (sodium dodecyl sulfatepolyacrylamide gel electrophoresis
L-glutamine, 2 g/L sodium bicarbonate, and antibiotics) at 38 C under [SDS-PAGE], 520% linear gradient, as per Laemmli, 1970) and then
5% CO2 in air. Flukes were then transferred to 75-cm2 tissue culture analyzed by immunoblotting. In brief, after blocking with 5% dry
flasks (Iwaki, Sciteck Div. Asahi Techno Glass, Funabashi City, Chiba, skimmed milk in Tris-buffered saline (20 mM, pH 7.4), the nitrocellu-
Japan) and maintained in culture medium (3 ml/fluke) at 38 C under lose membranes were first incubated with fluorescein isothiocyanate
5% CO2 in air. After 24 hr of incubation, the medium containing ESA (FITC)labeled mAb MM3 (as described by Liddell and Cryer, 1991),
was removed and centrifuged at 10,000 g for 20 min at 4 C in the then with peroxidase-conjugated rabbit anti-FITC Ig (DAKO Diagnos-
presence of protease inhibitors. The supernatant was passed through a ticos SA, Barcelona, Spain; dilution 1:500), and finally with the sub-
0.45-mm pore filter disk and then concentrated using an Amicon 8050 strate (3,3-diaminobenzidine tetrahydrochloride tablets, SigmaAl-
ultrafiltration cell (Amicon, Inc., Beverly, Massachusetts) equipped with drich). As a positive control, we used membranes incubated with the
a YM10 membrane (10,000 molecular weight cutoff), dialyzed against rabbit antiF. hepatica polyclonal IgG antiserum and peroxidase-con-
phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) (10 mM sodium phosphate buffer, 150 jugated goat anti-rabbit IgG (SigmaAldrich; 1:2,000).
mM NaCl, pH 7.4), sterilized by filtration, and stored at 280 C until
required. Protein concentration was measured by the bicinchonionic Two-site capture ELISA
acid method (Pierce Biotechnology Inc., Rockford, Illinois). A 2-site capture ELISA was used to evaluate whether the epitope
A fraction containing F. hepaticaspecific antigens was purified from recognized by mAb MM3 is present at single or multiple sites on the
whole F. hepatica ESA by size exclusion chromatography using an fast target antigen. Polystyrene microtiter plates (Nunc Immuno Plate Max-
protein liquid chromatographyhigh-performance liquid chromatogra- isorp Surface, NUNC, Roskilde, Denmark) were coated at 37 C for 2
phy system (AKTA Basic 10, Amersham Biosciences Europe GmbH, hr with 100 ml/well of a solution containing 10 mg/ml of MM3 in PBS.
Barcelona, Spain) on a Superdex 75 HR 10/30 column (Amersham Bio- After blocking uncoated sites with 5% skimmed dry milk in PBS, 100
sciences), as described previously (Mezo et al., 2003). The column was ml of the MM3 affinity-purified antigen fraction (protein content 5 mg/
calibrated with a mixture of knownmolecular weight proteins (Gel Fil- ml in PBS) was added to each well. After incubation for 2 hr at 37 C,
tration LMW Calibration Kit, Amersham Biosciences). The fractions in the plates were washed and then incubated (90 min at 37 C) with 100
the fourth peak (peak IV), which eluted between chymotrypsinogen A ml/well of FITC-labeled MM3 diluted 1:100 in PBS with 0.2% Tween
(25 kDa) and ribonuclease A (13 kDa), were pooled, concentrated by 20 and 1% skimmed dry milk (PBS-T). After washing 6 times, the
ultrafiltration using Centricon YM-10 centrifugal filter devices (Milli- reaction was detected by incubation first with peroxidase-conjugated
pore Corporation, Bedford, Massachusetts), and stored at 220 C until rabbit anti-FITC Ig (DAKO Diagnosticos SA) diluted 1:1,000 in PBS-
used. Some of these antigens were O-deglycosylated with 0.01 M T and then with the substrate (buffered H2O2 and o-phenylenediamine
NaOH as described previously (Lorenzo et al., 2000) and used to im- [OPD] SigmaAldrich, Madrid, Spain). After incubation for 30 min at
munize mice as indicated below. room temperature, the optical density (OD) was measured at 492 nm.
As a positive control to detect the antigenMM3 complex, we used
Monoclonal antibody production rabbit antiF. hepatica polyclonal IgG antiserum detected in turn with
The IgG1/k monoclonal antibody MM3 was obtained by fusion with peroxidase-conjugated goat anti-rabbit IgG (SigmaAldrich; 1:20,000).
P3-X63-Ag8.653 myeloma cells of spleen cells from BALB/c mice hy-
perimmunized with the F. hepatica O-deglycosylated antigens con- Detection of Fasciola hepatica coproantigens in ovine and bovine
tained in peak IV. The immunization protocol consisted of 3 intraperi- feces
toneal injections, 3 wk apart, of 50 mg of peak-IV proteins (for the first Sheep: Feces were obtained from an autochtonous Galician sheep
injection emulsified in Freunds complete adjuvant) and a final intra- strain (raza gallega), from a fluke-free herd (group A), from lambs
venous booster of 75 mg of protein administered 3 days before killing experimentally infected with very small numbers of F. hepatica meta-
and spleen cell fusion. Positive hybridomas producing antibodies that cercariae (group B), and from uninfected lambs (group C, control). The
recognized F. hepatica but not Dicrocoelium dendriticum antigens were group-A feces were obtained from fifty 4- to 6-mo-old lambs just before
obtained and selected according to the procedure described previously slaughter. Specifically, fecal samples were taken from each animal just
(Estevez et al., 1994; Iglesias et al., 1997). MM3 hybridoma cells were before inspection to confirm the absence of fascioliasis. Other parasitic
intraperitoneally injected into pristan-primed BALB/c mice, and the infections were diagnosed by visual examination and microscopic anal-
antiF. hepatica IgG1/k antibodies were purified from the ascitic fluid ysis of feces: 4 of the 50 lambs did not have detectable parasite infec-
by affinity chromatography on a protein G column (5 ml HiTrap Protein tion, whereas the remaining 46 had intestinal nematodes from 1 or more
G, Amersham Biosciences), according to the manufacturers protocol. genera of Trichostrongylidae, Molineidae (Nematodirus spp.), Ancylo-
stomatidae, Strongylidae, and Trichuridae (Trichuris spp.). Of the 46
Rabbit polyclonal antibodies
parasite-infected animals, 21 had gastrointestinal nematodes alone,
Polyclonal IgG antibodies were raised by hyperimmunization of 2 whereas the remaining 25 had double or triple infections with lung
New Zealand White rabbits with 4 subcutaneous injections, at 3-wk nematodes (1 or more of Cystocaulus ocreatus, Dyctiocaulus filariae,
intervals, of 200 mg of F. hepatica ESAs emulsified in either Freunds or Neostrongylus linearis), Moniezia spp., or Cysticercus tenuicollis.
complete adjuvant (for the first injection) or Freunds incomplete ad- The group-B feces were obtained from twenty-one 4-mo-old lambs
juvant (for the 3 booster injections). A week after the last immunization, reared under parasite-free conditions and subsequently infected once
the animals were bled, and the serum was obtained. The IgG fraction with 5 (n 5 3), 10 (n 5 3), 20 (n 5 3), or 40 (n 5 12) F. hepatica
was purified from serum on a protein G column, as above. metacercariae obtained in our laboratory from experimentally infected
MEZO ET AL.FASCIOLA HEPATICA COPROANTIGENS IN SHEEP AND CATTLE 847
FIGURE 4. Plot of the week PI at which MM3 capture ELISA of FIGURE 5. Percentages of experimentally infected lambs testing pos-
fecal supernatants tested positive against the number of flukes recovered itive by MM3 capture ELISA and by fecal examination for eggs, at
at necropsy. With the exception of the point at 3 flukes, 8 wk, repre- different times after infection. Specific F. hepatica coproantigens were
senting 3 lambs, all other points represent individual experimentally considered to be present if OD values were higher than the cutoff
infected lambs (15 lambs in total). (0.065) calculated as mean plus 4 SD of the OD values for fecal su-
pernatants from 50 lambs from a fluke-free herd (group A).
TABLE I. Fecal egg counts (eggs per gram [e.p.g.]) and coproantigen levels (OD values) in experimentally Fasciola hepaticainfected lambs
before (n 5 15) and after flukicide treatment (n 5 6). Fluke burdens were recorded at necropsy. The number of lambs testing positive (by ELISA
or egg count) is given in parentheses. OD492 cutoff value 5 0.065. Flukicide treatment with triclabendazole was done at week 14 PI.
Weeks postinfection
14 15 16 17 18
Untreated animals
Mean e.p.g. 6 SD 56 6 73 (15) 64 6 93 (15) 59 6 92 (15) 95 6 115 (15) 100 6 102 (15)
Mean OD 6 SD 2.042 6 0.189 (15) 1.981 6 0.298 (15) 2.135 6 0.105 (15) 2.005 6 0.275 (15) 2.139 6 0.224 (15)
Range fluke burden ND ND ND ND 136 (15)
Treated animals
Mean e.p.g.* 6 SD 67 6 65 (5) 0 (0) 5 6 3 (5) 12 6 13 (2) 45 6 59 (2)
Mean OD* 6 SD 1.873 6 0.294 (6) 0.530 6 0.06 (1) 0.130 6 0.025 (1)
Range fluke burden ND ND ND ND 0 (0)
* Mean OD values and mean e.p.g. counts, both in triplicate, were calculated using data from positive animals only.
850 THE JOURNAL OF PARASITOLOGY, VOL. 90, NO. 4, AUGUST 2004
TABLE II. Fecal egg counts (eggs per gram [e.p.g.]) in naturally Fasciola hepaticainfected cattle, classified (columns) by fluke burden at necropsy.
Egg count
Mean e.p.g.* 6 SD 3 6 1.1 6.1 6 4.4 14.4 6 22.2 9.4 6 4.3 30.7 6 28.8
Number of positive animals (%) 1 (14.3) 16 (47.1) 13 (76.5) 12 (80) 7 (100)
Total animals 7 34 17 15 7
* Mean e.p.g. counts were calculated using data from positive animals only (three independent determinations).
MEZO ET AL.FASCIOLA HEPATICA COPROANTIGENS IN SHEEP AND CATTLE 851
tecting F. hepatica infections in sheep and cattle, capable of , M. MARCET, AND C. M. FINLAY. 1997. Fasciola hepatica: De-
detecting subnanogram amounts of specific ESAs in feces. Pre- tection of antigenemia and coproantigens in experimentally infect-
ed rats. Experimental Parasitology 85: 117120.
liminary work in our laboratory seems to indicate that MM3, ESTEVEZ, J., J. LEIRO, M. T. SANTAMARINA, J. DOMNGUEZ, AND F. M.
like other antiF. hepatica mAbs, may also be useful for de- UBEIRA. 1994. Monoclonal antibodies to turbot (Scophthalmus
tecting circulating F. hepatica antigens in infected animals, as maximus) immunoglobulins: Characterization and applicability in
well as for the determination of antiFasciola serum antibodies immunoassays. Veterinary Immunology and Immunopathology 41:
353366.
in animals and human infections. HANNA, R. E. B., AND A. G. TRUDGETT. 1983. Fasciola hepatica: De-
velopment of monoclonal antibodies and their use to characterize
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS a glycocalyx antigen in migrating flukes. Parasite Immunology 5:
409425.
We thank Antonio Lagares, chief veterinary officer of the M. F. Mon- , , AND A. ANDERSON. 1988. Fasciola hepatica: Devel-
tellos abattoir (Betanzos, A Coruna, Spain), for freely facilitating sam- opment of monoclonal antibodies and their characterization by ul-
pling for this study. This work was supported in part by grants SC00- trastructural localization of antibody binding. Journal of Helmin-
085 from Instituto Nacional de Investigaciones Agrarias (Spain) and thology 62: 1528.
SAF2002-04057-02 from Ministerio de Ciencia y Tecnologa (Spain). IGLESIAS, R., J. LEIRO, M. T. SANTAMARINA, M. L. SANMARTN, AND F.
M. UBEIRA. 1997. Monoclonal antibodies against diagnostic Ani-
LITERATURE CITED sakis simplex antigens. Parasitology Research 83: 755761.
LAEMMLI, U. K. 1970. Cleavage of structural proteins during the assem-
ABDEL-RAHMAN, S., K. L. OREILY, AND J. B. MALONE. 1998. Evaluation bly of the head of bacteriophage T4. Nature 277: 680685.
of a diagnostic monoclonal antibody-based capture enzyme-linked LANGLEY, R. J., AND G. V. HILLYER. 1989. Detection of circulating par-
immunosorbent assay for detection of a 26- to 28-kd Fasciola he- asite antigen in murine fascioliasis by two-site enzyme-linked im-
patica coproantigen in cattle. American Journal of Veterinary Re- munosorbent assays. American Journal of Tropical Medicine and
search 59: 533537. Hygiene 41: 472478.
, , AND . 1999. Biochemical characterization and LIDDELL, J. E., AND A. CRYER. 1991. Characterization, purification and
localization of Fasciola hepatica 2628 kDa diagnostic coproan- labelling. In A practical guide to monoclonal antibodies, J. W. God-
tigen. Parasite Immunology 21: 279286. ing (ed.). Academic Press Inc., London, U.K., p. 105138.
ALMAZAN, C., G. AVILA, H. QUIROZ, F. IBARRA, AND P. OCHOA. 2001. LORENZO, S., F. ROMARS, R. IGLESIAS, M. T. AUDCANA, J. M. ALONSO,
Effect of parasite burden on the detection of Fasciola hepatica J. LEIRO, AND F. M. UBEIRA. 2000. O-Glycans as a source of cross-
antigen in sera and feces of experimentally infected sheep. Veter- reactivity in determinations of human serum antibodies to Anisakis
inary Parasitology 97: 101112. simplex antigens. Clinical and Experimental Allergy 30: 551559.
ANDERSON, N., T. T. LUONG, N. G. VO, K. L. BUI, P. M. SMOOKER, AND MARCET, R., A. DAZ, E. ARTEAGA, C. M. FINLAY, AND J. SARRACET.
T. W. SPITHILL. 1999. The sensitivity and specificity of two methods 2002. Passive protection against fascioliasis in mice by immuni-
for detecting Fasciola infections in cattle. Veterinary Parasitology zation with a monoclonal antibody (ES-78 MoAb). Parasite Im-
83: 1524. munology 24: 103108.
BEHM, C. A., AND N. C. SANGSTER. 1999. Pathology, pathophysiology MEZO, M., M. GONZALEZ-WARLETA, AND F. M. UBEIRA. 2003. Optimized
and clinical aspects. In Fascioliasis, J. P. Dalton (ed.). CABI Pub- serodiagnosis of sheep fascioliasis by FPLC fractionation of Fas-
lishing, Oxon, U.K., p. 185224. ciola hepatica excretory-secretory antigens. Journal of Parasitology
CONCEICAO, M. A., R. M. DURAO, I. H. COSTA, AND J. M. CORREIA DA 89: 843849.
COSTA. 2002. Evaluation of a simple sedimentation method (mod- MONTREUIL, J., S. BOUQUELET, H. DEBRAY, J. LEMOINE, J. C. MICHALSKI,
ified McMaster) for diagnosis of bovine fascioliasis. Veterinary G. SPIK, AND G. STRECKER. 1994. Glycoproteins. In Carbohydrate
Parasitology 105: 337343. analysis, a practical approach, M. F. Chaplin and J. F. Kennedy
DAZ, A., A. M. ESPINO, R. MARCET, O. OTERO, D. TORRES, C. M. (eds.). IRL Press, New York, p. 181293.
FINLAY, AND J. SARRACENT. 1998. Partial characterization of the PAZ-SILVA, A., J. PEDREIRA, R. SANCHEZ-ANDRADE, J. L. SUAREZ, P.
epitope on the excretory-secretory products of Fasciola hepatica DAZ, R. PANADERO, P. DEZ-BANOS, AND P. MORRONDO. 2002. Time-
recognized by monoclonal antibody ES78. Journal of Parasitology course analysis of coproantigens in rats infected and challenged
84: 5561. with Fasciola hepatica. Parasitology Research 88: 568573.
DUMENIGO, B. E., A. M. ESPINO, AND C. M. FINLAY. 1996. Detection of SANCHEZ-ANDRADE, R., A. PAZ-SILVA, J. L. SUAREZ, R. PANADERO, J.
Fasciola hepatica antigen in cattle feces by a monoclonal antibody- PEDREIRA, P. DEZ-BANOS, AND P. MORRONDO. 2001. Effect of fas-
based sandwich immunoassay. Research in Veterinary Science 60: ciolicides on the antigenemia in sheep naturally infected with Fas-
278279. ciola hepatica. Parasitology Research 87: 609614.
, , , AND M. MEZO. 2000. Kinetics of antibody- SOLANO, M., R. K. RIDLEY, AND H. C. MINOCHA. 1991. Production and
based antigen detection in serum and feces of sheep experimentally characterization of monoclonal antibodies against excretory-secre-
infected with Fasciola hepatica. Veterinary Parasitology 89: 153 tory products of Fasciola hepatica. Veterinary Parasitology 40:
161. 227239.
ESPINO, A. M., AND B. E. DUMENIGO. 2003. Fasciola hepatica. In In- WENSVOORT, P., AND H. J. OVER. 1982. Cellular proliferation on bile
ternational handbook of foodborne pathogens, M. D. Milliotis and ductules and gamma-glutamyl transpeptidase in livers and sera of
J. W. Bier (eds.). Marcel Dekker, Inc., Basel, Switzerland, p. 539 young cattle following a single infection with Fasciola hepatica.
562. Veterinary Quarterly 4: 161172.
, AND C. M. FINLAY. 1994. Sandwich enzyme-linked immuno- ZIMMERMAN, G. L., L. W. JEN, J. E. CERRO, K. L. FARNSWORTH, AND R.
sorbent assay for detection of excretory secretory antigens in hu- B. WESCOTT. 1982. Diagnosis of Fasciola hepatica infections in
mans with fascioliasis. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 32: 190 sheep by an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. American Jour-
193. nal of Veterinary Research 43: 20972100.