Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
Education of
Rudyard Kipling
BY MUKUND BELLIAPPA
Rudyard was the first child of Alice and John Lockwood Kipling
recently married twenty-seven year-olds who had arrived in Bombay
months before their first-born was expected. Both parents were artistic
and would prove to be powerful influences on their son. John Lock-
woodwhose appointment as a lecturer of architectural sculpture
and design at the J. J. School of Arts had brought them to Indiawas
a journalist, artist, and illustrator whose insatiable curiosity about In-
dian society would find abundant purpose in his sons later efforts. The
fathers fingerprints have been noticed on many of the sons works; by
most accounts, the Paters contributions to Kim were closer to that
of a collaborator. Before her marriage, Alice Kipling had been a cen-
tral figure in a clique of pre-Raphaelite artists in London that included
Edward Burne-Jones, William Morris, and Dante Gabriel Rossetti.
Socially astute, she would guide the family through the intricacies of
class-conscious Anglo-Indian society.
Kiplings five-year-long childhood in Bombay is considered by
his admirers to have deeply influenced his later artistry. The typical
colonial-era, Anglo-Indian Babaespecially a pre-school toddler
was likely to develop a social and linguistic intimacy with servant-
class Indians, which was denied to most white adults by the rigid stric-
tures of Victorian Raj society. Kipling admirers are likely to credit the
mystique of Kiplings allusive and scintillating prose to a vernacu-
lar translation device (to borrow the description of the GreatGame
historian PeterHopkirk), which developed from the tots interactions
with, mainly, Portuguese-Goan maids. On the other hand, dissenters
like Salman Rushdieare likely to discount these first five years by
pointing out how narrowly pragmatic, even prosaic, Kiplings use of
Indian words was: lots of jaldis, salaams, mallums, and bahut achas,
but little else.
Members of Post-Sepoy-Mutiny, Anglo-Indian society like the
Kiplings tended to regard themselves as missionaries of progress and
secular modernity. The renowned jurist James Fitzjames Stephen
The Unsentimental Education of Rudyard Kipling 211
The months around the date of the Mayo assassination were eas-
ily the most traumatic of Kiplings youth. During these months the
six-year-old was being wrenchingly adjusted from his pampered Baba
life in Bombay (that Hindi-warbling center of attention, and worry,
for a small crew of doting Indian servants) to life under the excori-
ating and bleak regime of an English boarding facility called Lorne
Lodge in Southsea (near Portsmouth.) Around Kiplings five South-
sea yearsaround the life in a house smelling of aridity and emp-
tiness; under the evangelical tyranny of the soon-to-be-widowed
Mrs.Holloway, who took in the school-aged children of Anglo-Indian
parents; in a milieu where the six-year-olds adorable Baba vivacity
was viewed as a trait to be flayed offKipling scholars have erected
an often trite Dickensian mythology. Some criticsmost compel-
lingly Elliot L.Gilbert and EdmundWilsonhave made this period
crucial to understanding Kiplings oeuvre. Going by the (clearly au-
tobiographical, but as clearly nonjudgmental) novella Baa Baa Black
Sheep, Kipling endured beatings, mental torture, food deprivations,
and enforced memorizations of passages from the Bible. But no con-
clusive estimate of the impact of these years on his work, or on his
world view, is possible.
One reason for this obscurity is that all members of the incredibly
tight Kipling clan, at different times, have been prodigious destroyers
of family correspondence. Some biographers have mentioned bonfires
of personal papers. Very little survives from these years. Compound
this family-wide obsession with privacy with Kiplings unfathomable
and lifelong prickliness, and, over that, compute the incalculable ef-
fect of a slowly but steadily deteriorating eyesight, which would re-
main undetected and uncorrected for more than a year, and even the
most keen-eyed biographer is likely to feel like hes groping around
in pitch darkness. In all this uncertainty, however, if theres a central
logic that can be applied to the widespread agreement of the impor-
tance of this harrowing period toward Kiplings artistic development
it is (to quote Erik Erikson) that it is human to have a long childhood;
it is civilized to have an even longer childhood. That is to say that
some aspects of Kiplings childhood ended at Southsea; some aspects
of civilization were never given a chance to take root. It explains at
least partly the brutish worldview projected by so many of the stories
of this otherwise gentle, even shy, soul.
A closer inspection of the timeline shows how powerfully the
Mayo assassination may have dominated all family exchanges during
214 The Antioch Review
have to shape his own destiny and do it with the inklings of the dis-
heartening reality that any fool . . . could write. The first two years
passed grappling with the tedium of being an employee of a privately
owned newspaper that was little noticed outside the Punjab while not
altogether giving up original writingsomething that at this point
he could more easily name than identify.
The Civil and Military Gazette, true to its name, existed to give
official news to a readership of officials. This it did primarily by
overusing the common system of scrapsa reflection as much of
its editor Stephen Wheelers imagination as of the expectations of
its readership. The contents of the newspaper were mainly produced
by applying a thoughtful scissorone was never far from Rudyards
elbowto news reports telegraphed in from major European news-
papers and from the newspapers of the three Indian presidency capi-
tals. No matter how much enthusiasm Kipling injected into descrip-
tions of his duties, it was abjectly provincial labor that, on account of
Wheelers frequent illnesses and accidents, often fell exclusively to
Rudyards lot.
The responsibilities of his job left Kipling little time to write
originally, and, perhaps, even to think and act originally. The great
comfort of being able to live in his fathers large bungalow came with
restrictions. Most of the bawdy after-hours club life, the weekend
hunting trips, polo tournaments, and (that charming Victorian chap-
eroned occasion for romance) picnicsall de rigueur for the young
male colonialwere vetoed either by mollycoddling Alice or by John
Lockwood (an animal lover). On many an evening shooting pestilen-
tial parrots in the garden while lying supine on a hammock had to pass
for entertainment. Lahores Anglo-Indian society was centered around
the cantonment at Mian Mir, a few miles away. Dinners theresit-
down affairs, large gatherings, with families, where everyone from the
top military brass down to lowly civilians confirmed their positions in
Anglo-Indian society and their distinction from Indian societywere
clearly cherished. But the teenage journalists demeanor in that set-
tingin the presence of older, more experienced, and, physically, far
more imposing, subalternsnever seemed to graduate past one of
awed silence. It was probably here, mingling with officers and men
who were circulated in and out of the many military camps between
Lahore and the Afghan borderthe big stations like Rawalpindi and
Peshawar and the smaller far-flung ones like DeraIsmailKhan and
Abbottabadthat Kipling first learned about the real state of the
216 The Antioch Review
hardly edifying. They ranged from the banalWe may safely assume
that Russia will annex, more or less formally and completely, every
inch of ground in Central Asia, [which is] not defended and safeguard-
ed by Englandto the vague and unsubstantiatedwe seem even
now, from time to time, to come across the [tracks of] . . . paid agents
of Russia [who] would seek . . . to establish intimate relations with . . .
those [Indians who are] dissatisfied with our rule, to the meticulously
researched but sensationalist, as when, on rumors that the Russians
intended to lay siege to Herat (the gateway to Afghanistan from the
west), after a compilation from all available publications on Russian
shipping in the Caspian sea, Kipling computed the size of an army that
the Russians could deliver for such a siege and, based on this inflated
estimate, concluded that within the next few weeks . . . the Indian
government may be compelled to occupy Kandahar, if not march on
Herat. It was all very amateurish. But he was only nineteen.
The Afghan Boundary Commission lost relevance as the weeks
slipped by. The Empire was vast; its troubles were many. In the same
weeks, other calamitiesIrish bombs in London, a disastrous defeat
in Khartoumsnatched the headlines. Then, because London re-
vealed the separate, and high-level, diplomatic line it was running to
St.Petersburg, the Commissions activities became a sideshow. It vir-
tually vanished from the newspapers at the announcement of another
far more promising development.
Viceroy Dufferin had orchestrated what promised to be a clinch-
ing move in this chapter of the GreatGame: AmirAbdurRahman had
accepted an invitation to a grand durbar at Rawalpindi. Based on the
sheer volume of reporting the assistant editor had done on the subject
over the past six months (the Gazette had also published a biography
of Abdur Rahman which was at least partly authored by Kipling) the
proprietors thought him fit to cover the event as a Special Correspon-
dent. The Amir was supposed to enter India through Peshawar, just
miles from the Afghan border. Kipling, like all the journalists covering
the event, was expected to trail the Amir and his entourage from Pe-
shawar to Rawalpindi and then to report on the durbar. He was going
to get his first, and only, glimpse of Afghanistan.
Theres no sign that Kipling was given a choice when it came to cover-
ing the Dufferin-Abdur Rahman durbar. It was obviously a rare oppor-
tunityin an entirely different class from that of editing the reports
The Unsentimental Education of Rudyard Kipling 219
these months. But even in Simla, the most English town in the Eastern
hemisphere, the terrors of Afghanistan were inescapable.
The soldiers of all lands take a tender and proprietary interest in
the alien whom he wishes to slay, the special correspondent wrote
from Simla for the Gazette. Hence the possessive, your man, your
object, your prisoner. One could only speculate at the reasoning that
had led him to a lecture at the United Service Institute (the only other
attendees were military officers) on the best means whereby a Ghazi
might be stopped in mid rush with a revolver and sword. A strip of
chain, sewn from elbow to wrist into ones jacket, could serve well
during such an attack. But beyond that, the defender had some difficult
decisions to make. Even if you ran the attacker through the body with
your sword, he could still cleave you open with one mighty final
effort. The concern when, with a heavy sword, one tried to make col-
lops of the attacker, was that the standard-issue British army sword
broke easily. The lecturer had designed a new sword, good for both
cutting and thrusting, which he exhibited lovingly and tenderly.
Revolvers posed problems as well. The new standard-issue ammuni-
tion fitted badly into the standard-issue revolver and lacked the punch
to stop an attacker unless you hit your man in the eye. Delivered
in a low, even monotone, the lecture might have been on geology
[or on] river frontages in the Gangetic valley. It ended with a vote of
thanks by a geriatric general who, to the amazement and amusement
of all, spoke about his early days in the army when he had been trained
on flintlocks.
The fanfaronade of the Dufferin-Abdur Rahman durbar might
have stalled the Russians but it had changed nothing on the border.
Attacks on Britishers high and low were still common. In considering
this state of affairs, a sense of humor was essential. The frivolous tone
of the report on the Simla lecture appears next only several months
later (months spent partly in the flirtatious company of the petite, at-
tractive Mrs.IsabellaBurtonthe real-life Mrs. Hauksbeeand her
milieu of grass widows who populate Plain Tales from the Hills) when
Kipling was back in Lahore. It made its appearance in a letter to Lio-
nel Charles Dunsterville, that most intimate of USC chums (and the
model for Stalky in Stalky & Co.). Lieutenant Dunsterville had just
arrived in India and was making his way to his post at Rawalpindi. Af-
ter a page or two of old school banter, we get this: You may get your
chance of something festive here. In the past few days, a colonel had
been killed near the Khyber Pass. Retribution was inevitable. Nota
The Unsentimental Education of Rudyard Kipling 223
Bene, the reporter cautioned, never close with an Afghan; plug him
from a distance. Theres no glory if he sticks you and precious little if
you pot him. I had an experience at Jamrud which brought this home
to me. I stood far off and heaved rocks at mine adversary like David
did and providentially smote him on the mouth insomuch that he lost
interest in me and departed. He had a knife and seemed to object to my
going on foot toward the Khyber.
It was the application of the knowing, experienced tone of the
lecturer in Simla to the report of an incident that, in all likelihood, had
been imagined, and that perhaps only for the edification of that most
admired of creaturesa Sandhurst man. In the approximately dozen
detailed reports Kipling had sent back from Peshawar and Rawalpin-
di, and in everything he had written in the ten months since, there had
been no mention of the attempt to enter the Khyber Pass from Jamrud,
as ill-advised and unlikely a venture as possible at a time when it was
crawling with armed tribals, and especially by that sleep-deprived and
edgy reporter. The conversion of personal experience into convincing
fiction was underway.