Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
The Warsaw Convention is formally called The Convention for the Unification of Certain Rules Relating to International Transportation by Air. The
Warsaw Convention dated October 12, 1929 was ratified by the Philippines on November 9, 1950 and took effect on February 7, 1951. It was
amended by the Hague protocol dated September 28, 1955 and the Philippines acceded to this Hague Protocol on November 30, 1966; the Hague
Protocol took effect on February 7, 1951. The Warsaw Convention was later amended by the Guatamala and Montreal Protocols in 1971 and 1975,
respectively, but the Philippines has not yet acceded to the said Protocals.
BINDING EFFECT
The Warsaw Convention to which the Republic of the Philippines is a party and which has the force and effect of law in this country applies to all
international transportation of persons, baggage or goods performed by an aircraft gratuitously or for hire. As enumerated in the Preamble of the
Convention, one of the objectives is to regulate in a uniform manner the conditions of international transportation by air. Section 14.2 of CAB
Economic Regulation No. 9 provides that for international flights, the relevant convention shall apply with respect to delayed, lost and damaged
baggage, meaning, the Warsaw Convention.
PURPOSES
The Warsaw Convention was designed to protect and promote the international airline industry that was, at the time of the drafting of the treaty,
still in its infancy.
WARSAW CONVENTION
The Convention Applies to international transportation by air. There is international transportation when:
1) The place of departure and the place of destination are within the territories of two contracting countries regardless of whether or not
there was a break in the transportation or transhipment;
2) The place of departure and the place of destination are within territory of a single contracting country if there is an agreed stopping place
within a territory subject to the sovereignty, mandate or authority of another power, even though the power is not a party to the
Convention. (Maps vs CA)
TRANSPORTATION BY AIR
The period during which the baggage or goods are in charge of the carrier, whether in an airport or on board an aircraft or in the case of a landing
outside an airport, in any place whatsoever (Sec.18(b), WC).
1) It does not cover any transportation by land, by sea, or by river performed outside an airport.
2) If the transportation takes place in the performance of a contract for transportation by air, for the purpose of loading, delivery, or
transhipment, any damage is presumed, subject to proof to the contrary, to have been the result of an event which took place during the
transportation by air (Sec. 18(c), WC).
Checked baggage or goods damage occurred during air transportation or when there is delay (Secs. 18 and 19, WC)
Note: in determining the amount of the carriers liability, only the total weight of the package or packages concerned shall be considered,
except when the value of other packages covered by the same baggage check or the same airway bill are affected, the total weight of
such other package or packages shall also be taken into consideration in determining the limit of liability.
Objects of which the passenger takes charges himself- 5,000 francs per passengers
Note: The Guatamala Protocol of 1971 increased the limit for passengers to US $100,000 and $1,000 for baggage. However, the SC
noted in Santos III vs Northwest Orient Airlines, et al. That the Guatamala Protocol is still ineffective.
TORT LIABILITY
The Warsaw Convention does not provide for an exclusive enumeration of instances when the carrier is liable. It does not provide for an absolute
limit of liability and it does not preclude the application of the Civil Code and other pertinent local laws. Hence, a complaint for quasi-delict can still
be filed even if the filing is beyond the prescriptive provided for under the Convention so long as it is within the prescriptive period of four (4) years
under the Civil Code.
a) The Warsaw Convention, however, denies to the carrier availment of the provisions which exclude or limit his liability, if the damaged is
caused by his willful misconduct or by such default on his part as, in accordance with the law of the court seized of the case, is considered
to be equivalent to willful misconduct, or if the damage is (similarly) caused.... by any agent of the carrier acting within the scope of his
employment (WC, as amended by the Hague Protocol and Montreal Agreement)