Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
AN OVERVIEW
BOOK 2
Stadler Brits
ComSatPro LTD
PO Box 10604
Centurion
Gauteng
South Africa
0046
Tel/Fax: +27 (0) 12 998 4577
E-mail: sbrits@comsatpro.com
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1 VSAT Systems 1
1.1 The market for VSAT Applications 1
1.2 The users 1
1.3 One-way VSAT services 1
1.4 Two-way VSAT Services 2
1.5 The drivers 2
1.6 Advantages 3
1.7 Disadvantages 3
1.8 Benefits of One-Stop Shop Solutions to customers 4
1.9 The value derived by end-users 4
1.10 A Definition of VSAT's 4
1.11 VSAT Network Topologies or Architectures 5
1.11.1 System types 5
1.11.2 Connectivity 5
1.11.3 Architecture issues 7
1.12 Gateway, Hub and Hubless networks 8
1.12.1 Hubs 8
1.13 VSAT Technology Developments 10
1.14 IPVSAT Systems 10
1.15 VSAT Network implementation 10
1.16 VSAT Network Design 10
1.17 User Requirement Specifications 11
1.18 Functionality Specifications 12
1.19 Capacity planning and sizing 12
1.20 The network design phase 12
1.21 VSAT Network Economics 12
1.21.1 Capital Cost items 12
1.21.2 Operational costs 13
1.22 Pilot Network Installations 13
1.23 A Typical VSAT Terminal 14
2 Open standards 15
3 SATELLITE orbits 16
3.1 Geosynchronous orbit 16
3.2 Geostationary Orbit (GSO) 17
3.2.1 What is the GSO? 17
3.2.2 Orbital Positions 18
3.2.3 Hot Orbital Positions 19
3.2.4 Hotbird 19
3.3 LEO's MEO's & GEO's & HEO's 20
3.3.1 Low Earth Orbit (LEO) 20
3.4 Space Debris 22
3.5 Inclined Orbits, Orbital positions and GSO Slot Positions 23
3.6 Summary 23
4 Some More on satellites 24
5 some more on frequencies 24
5.1 The Major Frequency Bands 24
5.1.1 Polarisation 27
6 Terminology 27
6.1 Bandwidth (BW) 27
6.2 Footprints and coverage 28
6.3 "Uplinks" and "Downlinks" 28
6.4 Transponders 28
6.5 Link budgets 28
6.6 Redundancy 29
6.7 "Bent Pipe" 29
6.8 Regenerative 29
6.9 On-Board processing 29
6.10 On-Board switching 29
6.11 Modulation Schemes 29
6.11.1 Amplitude Modulation 30
6.11.2 Frequency Modulation 30
6.11.3 Phase modulation 30
6.12 Multiple Access Schemes 30
6.13 Multibeam Satellite Systems 32
6.13.1 Beams 33
1 VSAT SYSTEMS
1.1 The market for VSAT Applications
VSAT technologies have evolved to the point where VSATs are able to address very effectively
most of the connectivity needs of ICT users, from the residential market to through to the corporate
market.
VSAT systems have traditionally only seen application within large corporates because of the costs
involved. This has been changed substantially since the advent of DTH television broadcasting,
where it has been shown that VSAT receive only technologies can be applied in the consumer end-
user markets. The success of these deployments has been largely due to:
• The development of open standards that have lowered the costs of TVRO terminals
• The launching of GSO satellites utilising Ku band frequencies that in turn allow the
deployment of smaller remote terminals
• Modern GSO satellites deliver high power spot beams that are able to focus directly on
specialised market areas
• The development of multibeam satellites with improved connectivity arrangements
• The desire by large corporations for redundant and alternative networks, independent of
terrestrial infrastructure.
• The need for connectivity that is always available, regardless of geographical and political
constraints.
• The increasing need for high-speed services and multimedia connectivity direct to end-
users
• The needs for more and more connectivity
1.6 Advantages
Satellite communication systems have some advantages that can be exploited for the provision of
connectivity. These are:
• Costs Insensitive to Distance
• Single Platform service delivery (one-stop-shop)
• Flexibility
• Upgradeable
• Network life cycle costs are lower than some alternatives
• Fast Deployment:
• Install & Commission: 1/2 - 2 Days
• Reliable Service: 99.9% for Data; 99.5%+ for Voice
• MTBF > 25,000 Hours (3 Years)
• Proven in 100+ Countries
• Unrestricted ubiquitous coverage of large geographical areas by single systems
• Low incremental costs per unit
1.7 Disadvantages
However like all systems there are disadvantages also. Some of these are
• High start-up costs (hubs and basic elements must be in place before the services can be
provided)
• Lack of adequate coverage in some parts of the world (Africa is the last continent that does
not have dedicated GSO satellite bandwidth available that will allow single satellite
connectivity anywhere on the continent).
• Higher than normal risk profiles
• Severe regulatory restrictions imposed by countries that prevent VSAT networks and
solutions from reaching critical mass and therefore profitability
• Some service quality limitations such the high signal delays (latency)
• Natural availability limits that cannot be mitigated against
• Lack of skills required in the developing world to design, install and maintain satellite
communication systems adequately
Some of these limitations and disadvantages are nothing else than opportunities that can be
overcome.
1.11.2 Connectivity
Satellite systems are all about the provision of connectivity over vast distances, unaffected by
geographical constraints such as terrain, rivers, oceans etc, and man-made constraints, such as
borders. There are three categories of connectivity.
Thirdly, star VSAT networks use terms such as "outbound" and "inbound" routes to try to
differentiate between the bandwidths and link qualities offered by these two services. The drawing
below illustrates these concepts. These terms only have real relevance when used within the context
of Star topologies.
1.12.1 Hubs
The term "Hub" is used to describe Star networks and also to describe networks that require one of
the earth stations in the network to manage and control the services provided. It is important to
understand the context within which the word "hub" is used.
Star networks
Users of star network topologies have two choices. They can use networks designed around a
dedicated company owned hub or "lease their services from a network provided by a service operator
on a "shared hub" facility.
In a closed user group star network providing services to only that group, the "Hub" could mean
simply the station that monitors and controls (manages) the services being provided. That same
station would (in most cases) also be the central station in a star network. In a "shared" VSAT service,
the term "hub" is used almost exclusively to describe the station that manages the services provided to
many users. If the shared VSAT service is based on a Star topology, then that station is also the
central station of the network. However if the service being provided is based on meshed or hybrid
topologies, then the term again is used to describe the management station.
A "controlling hub" is another way to describe the management hub. A VSAT network designed
to provide billed voice services will always have a station called the hub, because it is at that point
where the service management systems will be installed, in particular the "billing" system.
The following guidelines can be used to try to decide between a dedicated and a shared hub
service.
This assumes that a customer has the regulatory freedom to choose in the first place, and that if
not that the licensed VSAT service providers are prepared to allow customers to operated dedicated
hubs under their licences!
Dedicated Hubs are desirable if
1. The services to be provided are provided from a centrally located point where all connectivity
and data requirements reside.
2. That the customer wishes to eliminate (or is allowed to) the need for a long backhaul link
from the central offices to the location of a shared hub facility
3. The total number of remote VSATs in the network is large, certainly more than about 200.
4. The applications are considered to be strategic or total redundancy is required from
terrestrial infrastructure.
5. The highest possible level of availability and performance is required.
6. The customer is prepared to take on total network responsibility and train personnel to
operate a VSAT hub.
7. High bandwidth services are required (such as full broadcast quality video)
8. The customer is prepared to spend the money or can justify the life cycle costs in some way.
Shared Hubs are desirable if
1. The company wishes to become a VSAT service provider and can obtain the much-needed
licences to operate VSAT services. Star networks generally are expensive and the fixed
costs can then be shared between many customers.
2. Customers are happy and can get suitable (reliable) backhaul circuits to connect their
centrally based networks to the hub facility.
3. The company is prepared to satisfy the individual needs of customers (availability,
performance, data throughput, etc.).
4. Satellite bandwidth costs are high and only available in large blocks (complete transponder)
5. Individual customers requiring less than 200 VSATs are looking for services.
6. Technical expertise is scarce.
7. Technologies are changing rapidly.
8. Capital resources are not available to individual customers.
Gateways
The term "gateway" is relatively new. It should be used to describe the station in a VSAT network
that provides connectivity to other networks such as PSTN's PLMN's, Internet networks (WWW) and
data networks. VSAT networks of all types are connected to other networks in a country or anywhere
in the world through "gateways".
VSAT networks do not have to only have one "gateway" either. Thus it is possible to define a
station in a VSAT network as a "local" or "national" gateway and another (or the same one) as the
"international" gateway.
The only controlling factor is the services that are provided by the VSAT network.
"Hubless" networks
VSAT network technologies are traditionally complex, requiring a large amount of resources to
configure, monitor and control the services provided. Technological developments have reduced the
complexity of these systems to the point where it is now possible for any station on a network to
undertake the network management functions and thus the term "hubless" networks. In truth there is
no such thing as a "hubless" network. Please note that "hubless" networks are almost always meshed
or hybrid networks, because of the quality requirements needed to be able to achieve all the
management functionality needed. "Hubless" VSAT networks also imply that the networks are "self
healing" in that a failure at the "designated hub" station will be detected and a standby hub station will
be able to take over network management automatically, resulting in less total network downtime.
• Remote terminal costs. This must include critical items such as installation, on site spares
holdings, power supply upgrades and housekeeping items such as air-conditioning and
accommodation requirements.
• Initial licence fees for VSAT terminals and hubs.
• System redundancy costs
• Gateway equipment costs
• Overall network installation and commissioning costs.
• Supply of interface equipment to other networks.
• Network management equipment and systems.
• Personnel training costs that include the cost of training VSAT service users.
• Clear time limits for the acceptance testing process must be laid down.
• The end-user customer must accept responsibility for all costs related to the provision of
the VSAT services for the duration of the test such as the bandwidth costs.
• Acceptance of the network by the customer must also mean that the services will have
been deemed to be provided as of the start of the pilot test phase.
VSAT service providers offering pilot networks on shared hubs are able to recover the costs of
shared resources from other customers but need to ensure that they are not left with unrecoverable
costs associated with equipment installed at new customer premises.
2 OPEN STANDARDS
The success of the GSM open standards showed that it is possible to create an open standard that
many suppliers could build equipment for. The same has now happened with the development of the
so-called DVB-RCS standard. For the first time, inter-operability between VSAT equipment from
numerous suppliers is now possible, although only a few niche market suppliers have started to
produce systems based on these standards.
By far the biggest driver has been the successes that have been achieved in the DTH VSAT
market where the combination of MPEG standards with the work done on Digital Video Broadcasting
standards, have shown that open standards in VSATs are possible and very desirable.
The DVB standards are designed to optimise bandwidth utilisation with any system designed to
deliver vast quantities of data to remote sites. The DVB standards provide a common transport
stream layer allowing for many MPEG signals to be multiplexed together onto a single carrier for
delivery to large numbers of remote sites. The standards provide for common service information
interfaces, common Reed Solomon Forward error correction coding schemes. DVB further supports
media specific modulation schemes, thus making the standard ideal for combination with FDM TDM
and CDM satellite modulation schemes. DVB also allows for common conditional access encryption
schemes to be imbedded in the main baseband.
A family of standards, each one optimised (but mutually compatible at baseband level) for different
media has been developed, some of which are listed below:
• DVB-S/S2: configured for use across different frequency bands, bandwidths and power
levels on satellite systems
• DVB-C: for cable television systems
• DVB-T: for terrestrial systems
The DVB-S standard is ideally suited to VSAT applications where demand is for high information
delivery in one direction is required. Some examples are, data broadcasting and Internet
information delivery to remote sites. The standard ensures that a SCPC system fully utilising a
complete transponder can deliver up to 45 Mbps over a vast geographical area. This has allowed
the integration of many ICT service with normal digital broadcasting through a common DVB
multiplex unit.
The DVB-RCS standard has been specifically developed for use in Star networks for the delivery of
low cost Internet access services direct to the home market, as an integral part of normal DTH
services or as stand alone systems. This standard should allow for the mass manufacture of low cost
VSAT terminals. The standard is ideally suited for Star network topologies and services. The
standard is not suitable for use in the corporate, SME and Soho market segments because these
networks generally require larger return channels. However the combination of DVB with traditional
ICT SCPC DAMA systems provides an alternative method to deliver return path bandwidths of up to 2
Mbps. The following drawing shows how the various systems can be provided to address the new IP
based markets.
The sketch shows how successfully the mature tried and tested technologies have been combined
with the new standards to produce truly remarkable new solutions for digital IP based services. The
services are fully integrated OSS services. Most suppliers are providing a family of products that can
be provided over any type of network topology. Some systems are even able to adapt to the type of
traffic delivery form a Star to a mesh to a hybrid topology on demand.
3 SATELLITE ORBITS
Satellite communication systems make use of satellites that orbit the earth at different altitudes
above the surface of the earth. Many orbits are used for communication systems. The section below
describes the most important orbits used by communication systems.
36,000 km
The geostationary orbit, also named the Clarke orbit in honour of Arthur C Clarke, as he was the
first person to postulate the idea of using this orbit for communication satellites.
The geostationary orbit is a special case of the general geosynchronous orbit. The GSO meets
certain fundamental conditions. These are:
• The GSO's orbital plane is the same as the earth's equatorial plane. This means that the
inclination angle, with respect to the equatorial plane, is zero .
• A satellite in GSO moves in the same direction as the earth rotates, i.e. from West to East.
• The angular velocity of the satellite is the same as that of the earth.
• The altitude of the satellite above the equator is 35 786 km, (note this is the average value).
A satellite in a geostationary orbit will appear fixed above the surface of the Earth. In practice, the
orbit has small non-zero values for inclination and eccentricity, causing the satellite to trace out a small
figure of eight in the sky.
The other properties or characteristics associated with the GSO and GSO satellites are:
• The maximum angle that the earth is viewed from the satellite is 17,4º.
• The footprint, or service area of a geostationary satellite covers almost 1/3 of the Earth's
surface (from about 75º South- to about 75º North-latitude), so that near-global coverage is
possible, with a minimum of three satellites in orbit.
• The propagation delay of a radio signal transmitted earth-to-satellite-earth lies between 238
milliseconds and 278 milliseconds.
Minimum = 2R0/C
Maximum = 2{(R0 + RE)/C} cos(17,4/2)
Where:
Ro is the satellite altitude measured from a point on the equator directly
below the satellite, = 35 786 km
RE is the radius of the earth, = 6 378 km
C is the speed of light, a constant, = 300 000 km/sec
Later the idea of nominal band plans was extended to the FSS services as well for basically the
same reasons because very few broadcast services (if any) have been provided using the BSS
frequencies allocated. Most broadcast services in use today use FSS allocations simply because
equipment is available for these portions of the band AND because BSS and FSS are able to occupy
one satellite AND because in most cases the only way to make a satellite economically viable is to
combine BSS and FSS services.
Now that service convergence is a de facto reality between broadcasting, voice data and Internet,
there is even less motivation for separating out the BSS services into their own frequencies and band
plan allocations.
At first it was believed that the closest that satellites could be placed would every 5º. Modern
methods used in station keeping now suggest that the spacing could be reduced to 2º apart.
No an orbital position represent a "cube of space nominally centred every 2º apart on the GSO
extending vertically above and below the GSO nominal orbit and East and West by + and – 0.2
degrees.
Orbital positions are always quoted relative to The Greenwich meridian as X degrees West or Y
degrees EAST of GMT. A look at any of the websites of a typical satellite operator will clearly show
what this means.
The orbital positions are approximately 1472 km apart, on the GSO.
3.2.4 Hotbird
Some satellite operators have been able to corner the market for broadcasting within a certain
geographical area. When this happens, all the broadcasters providing material for reception in that
area try to get capacity on the same satellite and hence the satellite then becomes known as a
"Hotbird", very much in demand.
LEO's are either elliptical or circular orbits at a height of less than 2,000 km above the surface of
the earth. The orbit period varies between 90 minutes and 2 hours. Satellites in LEO are affected by
atmospheric drag, which causes the orbit to gradually deteriorate. The radius of the footprint of a
communications satellite in LEO varies from 3 000 to 4 000 km. In other words, a LEO satellite using
an antenna that generates a circular footprint will provide coverage in a circular area that moves over
the earth in step with the movement of the satellite. The maximum time during which a satellite in
LEO orbit is above the local horizon for an observer on the earth is up to 20 minutes. Any
communications system using this type of orbit requires a large number of satellites in a number of
different inclined orbits to provide the same coverage, as that would be achieved by a GSO satellite.
When a satellite serving a particular user moves below the local horizon, it needs to be able to hand
over the service to a succeeding one in the same or adjacent orbit. Satellite communication systems
such as the Iridium and GlobalStar systems involved many satellites placed in complex orbit patterns
to provide coverage for the target markets that these systems proposed to, or tried to serve. There
are many technical challenges that these systems faced. One of these related to the chosen orbit
(LEO) is known as Doppler Shifts. The effect of the movement of the satellite is to increase the
frequency of the received signal as a satellite approaches a ground station and to decrease the
frequency of the received signal as a satellite moves away from a ground station. The GlobalStar
system originally proposed to use 48 satellites in 8 orbital planes (at about 1 400 km above the earth)
whereas the Iridium system proposed to use 66 satellites in 6 orbital planes (at about 780 km above
the earth). Ground feeder link stations and remote terminals would have to "track" the satellites for
optimal performance. Hand held terminals using omni-directional antennas similar to those used by
normal cellphones. Thus, it is possible to make dual handsets capable of connecting to LEO systems
and to terrestrial cellular networks.
Many other systems were proposed none of which saw the light of day, and now that both
GlobalStar and Iridium are no longer seen as viable projects in the long-term.
Once again the problems of implementing these systems were under estimated even if shown to
be technically feasible and the only project that came close to implementation was The ICO project,
consisting of 10 satellites in inclined orbits at about 10 000 km above the earth.
A polar orbit is inclined at about 90º to the equatorial plane, covering both poles. The orbit is fixed
in space, and the Earth rotates underneath. A single satellite in a Polar Orbit provides in principle
coverage to the entire globe although there are long periods during which the satellite is out of view of
a particular ground station. Communications systems of the store-and-forward type can make use of
satellites in Polar Orbits, but without many satellites being place in these orbits continuous coverage
would not be possible.
Most Small-LEO systems employ polar, or near-polar orbits. An example of such a system is the
COSPAS-SARSAT Maritime Search and Rescue system. This system uses 8 satellites in 8 near-
polar orbits: Four SARSAT satellites move in 860 km orbits, inclined at 99º, which makes them sun-
synchronous. Four COSPAS satellites move in 1000 km orbits, inclined at 82º.
The problem is no less serious for the GSO orbit. The GSO orbit and its slot positions are a scarce
resource; so used "end of life" satellites cannot be allowed to remain in place. This is besides the fact
that station keeping requires fuel on board the satellite to fire rockets to keep the satellite in place.
The ITU and the US government have a set of rules that require all GSO satellite operators to place
"end of life satellites into a "graveyard orbit" about 300 km above the GSO orbit. However the Inter-
Agency Space Debris Co-ordinating Committee (IADC) is in the process of changing the rules to allow
satellites to placed into an orbit only 235 km above the GSO. It is believed that these satellites will
slowly be "captured" by the sun and drawn ever so slowly towards it until finally they will burn up in the
sun.
Not all operators have followed the rules however. Some have allowed their satellites to be used
until all fuel resources have been used up and none was available for transfer into their "end-of-life
orbits". In 1997-1998 38 GSO satellites were taken out of service. 13 were placed into an orbit way
beyond the IADC requirement, 9 beyond the 300 km ITU/US requirement and 12 were abandoned in
GSO. Of these, only one belonged to a USA operation. The others were all either Russian or
Chinese.
The issue is that the fuel that has to be kept in reserve for the placing of the satellite into the
graveyard orbit comes at a cost. That cost is measured in terms of the number of weeks of useful life
that has to be sacrificed, and the higher the orbit the more it costs. Each 25 km of altitude required by
the rules means one week less of life.
GSO satellites have to be accurately maintained in their orbital positions. This process will be
described later. As satellites age, satellite operators extend the life of satellites by placing satellites in
"inclined" orbits. The inclination is measured in degrees away from the equatorial plane. These
satellites are said to "drift" North or South, and no longer appear stationary. Satellite transponder
capacity on these satellites is normally cheaper than normal, but users must make use of tracking
antennas to be able to provide continuous communication links using such satellites.
3.6 Summary
The types of orbit available for satellite communication systems are numerous as can be seen from
the above. The selection of an appropriate orbit for any satellite system is dependent on the system
that is to be provided and the functionality required of the system. Not all orbit types are equally suited
to all systems. The most favourable orbits are:
• The HEO orbits inclined at about 64 to the equatorial plane. This orbit is stable with respect to
irregularities in terrestrial gravitational forces. The orbit is useful for mobile communication systems
where low elevation angles very often result in shielding effects from buildings and terrain factors.
Also such system can be very effectively used to provide coverage of the Polar Regions.
• ICO circular inclined orbits are very popular in earth observation and imaging systems. The
altitude of the satellite is constant and with near 90º inclination angles, such a satellite system will
pass over every region of the earth according to a regular and predictable timetable. An example is
the SPOT system at an altitude of 830 km an inclination angle of 98,7º and a period of 101 minutes.
• The GSO orbit, with an inclination angle of zero degrees, an altitude of 35 786 km and the most
useful orbit for stable high quality communication and broadcasting systems.
The choice of an orbit depends on the purpose of the system to be provided. Some of the
parameters that must be considered when making a design choice are:
• The coverage required especially in the Polar Regions.
• The altitude of the satellite has minimal effect on overall performance and quality of
communication systems for a given coverage area. The signal attenuation varies according to the
inverse square of the distance that would tend to make one believe that LEO satellites offer better
performance because of the low attenuation that has to be taken into account in the link budgets.
However when one factors in the coverage area requirements then some areas will involve longer
paths with more atmospheric interference and lower performance.
• The elevation angles of earth stations. HEO and Polar Orbit systems offer very high elevation
angles and thus do not suffer from blocking factors, but are not always visible. GSO satellites placed
at some locations may offer very low "look angles" where local obstacles come to play. The elevation
angles are affected by the location of the earth station on the earth's surface.
• By far the most over played aspect is that of propagation delay. GSO offers a constant but long
250 ms whereas LEO systems promise shorter RTT's but this has to be weighed against the
increased complexity of the systems if continuous communication facilities are required.
• Interference with other systems using the radio frequency spectrum. GSO systems involve
satellites in known locations and thus non-interfering bandplans have been developed. Interference
probabilities are much higher and more complex to deal with for orbiting satellite systems.
• The costs involved in launching satellites. The costs are almost directly proportional to the total
mass of the satellite, but GSO satellites require two launches for a given coverage area with an in-
orbit spare, but a LEO system requires many launches to achieve the same result even though the
mass of the satellites are much less.
The following table shows the ITU band numbers and a few other designations. There is even an
attempt underway to give the bands new codes just to add to the confusion!
The other very crucial sections of the radio regulations referring to satellite communication matters
are the famous (or infamous) Appendix 30, Appendix 30A and appendix 30B. These appendices
contain the details of the nominal GSO satellite band plans that govern all slot position allocations for
each and every country. The nominal band plans were created to try to ensure that all countries get
("their fair share" of the available slot positions. The sad part is that very few countries have to date
been in a position to launch their own satellites! Thus many of the satellites that are in orbit at the
moment make use of slot positions that have been "ceded" to those countries that can afford their own
satellites. The USA, the European Community, Russia, and a very small handful of domestic satellite
programs dominate the GSO orbit.
5.1.1 Polarisation
An electromagnetic wave radiated by an antenna consists of an electric field and a magnetic field.
These two fields are at right angles to each other and to the direction of propagation.
Now it is possible to design a transmitter to transmit what is known as circularly polarised signals
where the wave "rotates" either right-hand (Clockwise) or left-hand (anticlockwise) as well as non-
rotating waves (linearly polarised signals) that are either vertically polarised or horizontally polarised.
The significance of all this (besides the highly complex antenna design, the mathematics and other
technical issues) is that:
1. Antennas designed for transmission and reception of circular polarised waves cannot
receive or transmit linearly polarised signals.
2. Antennas designed for linearly polarised signals cannot transmit or receive circular
polarised signals.
3. Antennas can however be designed to receive both left-hand and right-hand signals or both
vertical and horizontal polarisations.
4. This allows for the same frequency to be used at the same site for both modes of
transmission thus improving on the total utilisation of the frequency spectrum.
5. Antennas can also be designed to receive all forms of polarisation. These antennas are
costly and are not generally used for commercial systems anymore.
The ITU uses this property of circular and linear polarisation in the band plans by allocating the
same frequencies to many satellites in such a way that there would be no interference between
adjacent services.
The commercial impact of all of this is that:
• Network designers must know, before any ground station equipment is purchased, which
satellite is to be used so that the correct antennas can be specified
• Network designers must know if both polarisations are to be used on the same antenna,
also before the antenna is specified
• Network designers cannot move services from one satellite to another that uses a different
polarisation scheme on a whim.
For example, most Intelsat satellites in operation use circular polarisation, and PanAmSat uses
linear polarisation. In South Africa, DSTV services on PAS 10 are all linearly polarised. Most point-to-
point services offered by Telkom make use of circular polarisation.
6 TERMINOLOGY
6.1 Bandwidth (BW)
Bandwidth is a generic term used to describe a portion of the frequency spectrum that has a lower
limit and an upper limit. It is used in many different contexts, sometimes to illustrate that a
transmission is restricted to certain values and other times to indicate what bandwidth is required for a
particular service.
The downlink is that part of the space segment that transmits the signal back to the ground
including the transmitter on the satellite.
6.4 Transponders
A satellite payload is made up of paired transmit/ receive devices known as transponders. It
includes any equipment involve in the frequency conversion process and also any regenerative
equipment that may also be provided. There are different transponder types. A regenerative
transponder includes a regeneration stage and a hopping transponder is frequency agile and able to
be remotely reconfigured for a different bandwidth and frequency.
Satellite operators invariably insist on being provided with the results of the Link budget
calculations so that they can verify that the planned link will not overload a transponder. This is not so
important if the transponder is entirely dedicated to one user as if this happens only he will be
affected. A shared transponder however means that all the users must jointly stay within the limits set
by the operator and thus he will insist on the calculations. He may even demand some changes to
ensure the total limits are not exceeded. Many users get the satellite operator to do the calculations
for them as a result and then just implement the "link" according to the operators' requirements.
The whole purpose of the link budget therefore is to get optimal performance from the link at the
lowest possible transponder utilisation level using the lowest possible power levels but still meeting the
link performance criteria required for the service.
The only parameters available to the end user are antenna sizes, output powers of the transmitters
and receiver and demodulator performance criteria.
6.6 Redundancy
Redundancy is used to describe any and all network elements or components provided in a design
for back-up purposes. Satellites provide spare transponders that can be used for back-up and may
other components that can be remotely switched into a circuit if a component fails. This is of course
totally dependent on the equipment on the satellite that controls this process!
6.8 Regenerative
Regenerative satellites do process the signals. In effect the satellite then becomes an earth station
in the sky because the signal is demodulated and re modulated after processing for retransmission.
This process allows in digital systems for all interference and noise added to the signal in the uplink
stage to be removed and transmitted afresh as if it came direct from the original earth station. Such
satellites are more complex than bent pipe satellites. They also have to be designed for very specific
services in mind and are not as flexible as "bent pipe" satellites. Users of such satellites have to be
very sure of the market they want address and the services they want to provide, as changes are not
possible after the satellite is launched.
A further issue that is relevant to satellite systems is that Multiple access can also be implemented
by providing multiple access to a particular transponder or to a particular channel on a transponder.
The three techniques differ only in that the division is done by either using frequencies or by using or
by using the same frequency at different times or by applying a coding scheme to the transmission
and using the same frequency with different codes.
All that has to be addressed is how to prevent the wrong messages from being passed onto other
channels at the other end.
In FDMA the signals occupy different sub-bands, in the time domain the times are carefully
synchronised across the links and in the coding system each signal is identified by a unique signature.
The next step in the process is to add the aspect of a single channel per carrier (SCPC) or a
multiple channel per carrier (MCPC) to the equation.
This in satellite system we talk of SCPC/FDMA or MCPC/FDMA and similarly for the others.
FDMA is simple to implement but lacks flexibility and capacity is lost when loads increase and the
carriers have to always be transmitted in the same order
TDMA requires time synchronisation to achieve the use of the time domain. The advantages are
that only a single carrier has to be transmitted occupying all of the bandwidth available. Transmission
throughput remains high even under load conditions. There is no need to control transmitter power
and all stations transmit and receive on the same frequencies. The disadvantages are the need for
timing synchronisation and the need to correctly dimension the network to achieve the desired
throughput.
CDMA is also simple to implement once the technique is understood. It does not require
synchronisation and it offers protection against interference and interception.
The last aspect is that of Demand Assignment, where channels are only allocated if and when
required on a per channel basis and on a per repeater basis. Again two methods can be used, that of
fixed assignment and on demand assignment.
Thus we get to the point where some services are referred to as DAMA Demand Assignment
Multiple Access or PAMA permanently assigned Multiple Access. The difference is simply that the
one only assigns channels when required and the other.
The diagram below best describes these techniques.
The most popular method is a combination of the first two where some transponders are used for
cross-strapped connections either fixed or variable and others using transponder hopping techniques.
6.13.1 Beams
There are five types of beams:
• Global beams that provide coverage of the complete portion of the earth that the satellite
can "see". Global beams are usually circular beams produced by reflecting antennas.
• Zone beams that provide coverage of only a portion of the earth. Shaped beams may be
a combination of reflecting antennas and/or phased array antennas produce these.
• Spot beams that deliberately focus energy on a particular area of the earth. Spot beams
are normally circular beams produced by reflecting steerable antennas.
• Multiple beam coverage implies many beams using different frequency bands and
different polarisations.
• Lattice beams using a defined frequency pattern (3 or 7 pattern).
Shaped beams are produced by altering the shape of the reflector, or by using a horn feed array
driven by mechanical phase shifters, the so-called phased array antenna.
Phased array antennas are more efficient at concentrating power within the desired footprint with
less interference outside of the footprint. Phased array antennas allow electronic manipulation of the
antenna shape by electronically changing the phase distribution and the amplitude of the radiating
elements. Such methods allow "fine tuning of footprints after satellite launch, by telecommands sent
form the TT&C station.
The disadvantage of using phased array antennas and electronic manipulation of the elements is
complexity, increased power drain and increased risk of component failure.
Multiple beam coverage can be done using separate beams with normally circular footprints all
using the same frequencies but different polarisations in a grid format, or by contiguous beams that
may overlap each other to some extent but using different frequencies and different polarisations.
Lattice beams are used in mobile satellites in particular where generally only the frequencies are
changed to allow mobile earth station equipment and handsets to roam within the larger "footprint".
Note that the higher the number of frequencies used in the pattern, the less interference possibilities
exist but this goes hand in hand with reduced overall capacity per beam is possible.