Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
1/2/3/4, 2014
Reference to this paper should be made as follows: Pack, K., Ahn, K., Huh, H.
and Lou, Y. (2014) Fracture modelling of DP780 sheets using a hybrid
experimental-numerical method and two-dimensional digital image
correlation, Int. J. Materials and Product Technology, Vol. 48, Nos. 1/2/3/4,
pp.3446.
Yanshan Lou graduated from Jiamusi University and Jilin University for his
Bachelors and Masters degrees, respectively. He joined CSMD in 2007 and
completed his PhD dissertation in 2012 with the development of a new ductile
fracture criterion and its application to various components made out of steel
sheets. His interest was extended to general plasticity models. He is currently
working at Swinburne University as a Postdoctoral Associate.
1 Introduction
Basically, four or five types of ductile fracture tests are performed covering a wide
range of stress states, and the strain value at the onset of failure (fracture strain) should be
defined as well as representative stress states in order to calibrate this model. There are
largely two methods to determine fracture strain: 2D-DIC, where the fracture strain is
calculated with measured in-plane strain components based on the definition of
equivalent plastic strain in the plane stress condition; a hybrid experimental-numerical
method, in which the fracture strain is defined as the maximum equivalent plastic strain
predicted in finite element simulation when the same amount of displacement as in an
actual test up until onset of failure is applied to the boundary of a finite element model
for each type of specimen. In this study, the applicability of 2D-DIC to fracture
modelling of DP780 sheets is investigated by comparing fracture envelopes constructed
by both methods. For sheet metal application, fracture loci, which satisfy the plane stress
condition, were taken out from each envelope, drawn in the space of the equivalent strain
to fracture and the stress triaxiality, and compared with each other. Furthermore, the
fracture loci were transformed into fracture forming limit diagrams (FFLD), which are a
more extensively used description of ductility in sheet metal forming community.
2 Experiment
2.1 Material
For the present study, DP780 steel sheets with 1.2 mm thickness and the minimum
ultimate tensile strength of 780 MPa were provided by POSCO. A dual-phase steel in the
class of advanced high strength steels has now come into wide use as an auto-body plate
to enhance the crashworthiness and fuel efficiency. Its microstructure features scattered
martensite islands in a soft ferrite matrix. The chemical composition of DP780 sheets
analysed with the Electron Probe Micro Analyzer is summarised in Table 1.
Table 1 Chemical composition of DP780 1.2 t in wt%
Element Mn Si C P S
wt% 2.23 1.01 0.069 0.014 0.002
F ( 22 33 ) + G ( 33 11 ) + H ( 11 22 )
2 2 2
Hill = (1)
+2 L 232 + 2M 312 + 2 N12 2
Fracture modelling of DP780 sheets 37
The Lankford ratios measured with DIC were r0 = 0.83, r45 = 0.99 and r90 = 0.92. Since
out-of-plane shear tests are not feasible, L and M are assumed to be 1.5, which
corresponds to isotropic condition. The hardening curve was also obtained in the rolling
direction and fitted with Swift power law equation. Hills coefficients along with Swift
parameters are given in Table 2. For a reliable numerical simulation even after necking, it
should be an integral part to identify the stress-strain relation in the post necking region.
To this end, a so-called inverse method was used, following the procedures by Dunand
and Mohr (2010).
F G H L M N A 0 n
In order to calibrate the MMC fracture model, four types of basic ductile fracture tests
were performed on specimens; with a central hole (CH) of 8 mm in diameter;
two symmetric circular notches (TSCN) of 10 mm radii; flat grooved (FG); diagonally
double notched (DDN). These four specimens characterise the fracture property in
uniaxial tension, condition between plane strain and biaxial tension, plane strain tension,
and shear loading, respectively. Only rolling direction was considered, and each
specimen was tested using INSTRON 5583, with load-displacement curves recorded
in real time and deformation images captured all the way to fracture with a single
high speed camera, Phantom v9.0. For the purpose of measuring fracture strain with
2D-DIC, CH specimens were replaced by DB specimens because DIC technique is not
applicable to the point of fracture in CH specimens, which lie in the intersection of a
hole and the transverse axis of symmetry. Figure 2 shows photographs of specimens
before and after tests.
38 K. Pack et al.
Figure 2 Photograph of fractured specimen, (a) with a central hole (b) TSCN (c) FG (d) DDN
(e) DB (see online version for colours)
(d) (e)
obtained load-displacement curve was represented along with those from three
experiments in Figure 3, which shows that the predicted load-displacement curve agrees
well with experimental ones. The reliability of simulation was more strictly verified by
comparing the evolution of the largest component of axial logarithmic strain on the
surface of a specimen measured by DIC with the one obtained from simulation as
demonstrated in Figure 4. When it comes to a DDN specimen, equivalent plastic strain
was compared instead of axial logarithmic strain because a finite rotation of the gauge
section in this type of specimen with deformation makes an axial component of strain
meaningless, and the absence of recognisable necking in shear loading adds the
dominance of planes stress condition. A blue curve without symbol in Figure 3 denotes
the evolution of the equivalent plastic strain at the fracture initiation point. The change in
the slope of the curve indicates the development of diffuse or localised necking, which
accelerates deformation. Each specimen features a different necking phenomenon, and
this is mainly due to the different stress states inside of it. The fracture strain was defined
as the maximum equivalent plastic strain at the average of three displacements to fracture
measured from experiments. In addition, to identify loading paths at the fracture initiation
point, the histories of the stress triaxiality and the normalised Lode angle defined as
equation (2) were investigated.
m 6 2 J
= , = 1 = 1 cos 1 33 (2)
2
Figure 3 Load-displacement curve from experiment and finite element simulation, and the
evolution of equivalent plastic strain, (a) with a central hole (b) TSCN (c) FG (d) DDN
(see online version for colours)
(a) (b)
(c) (d)
40 K. Pack et al.
Figure 4 Evolution of axial logarithmic strain and equivalent plastic train on the surface of each
type specimen, (a) with a central hole (b) TSCN (c) FG (d) DDN (see online version
for colours)
(a) (b)
(c) (d)
Even though all the specimens were designed such that stress states are kept as constant
as possible, these two parameters vary with deformation, especially after necking. Thus,
weighted averages during the entire process in the form of equation (3) were used as
representative stress states for the calibration of the MMC model.
f f
( p ) d p ( p ) d p
avg = 0
, avg = 0
(3)
f f
Stress triaxiality, 0.320 0.624 0.628 0.0281 0.388 0.533 0.569 0.0287
Lode angle, 0.905 0.217 0.0696 0.0820 0.824 0.275 0.0787 0.101
Fracture modelling of DP780 sheets 41
Figure 5 Distribution of strain right before fracture, (a) DB (b) TSCN (c) FG (d) DDN
(see online version for colours)
(a) (b)
(c) (d)
42 K. Pack et al.
The fracture surface strain was calculated by substituting measured in-plane strain
components at the point of onset of failure until the first visible crack is detected into the
work-conjugate equivalent plastic strain of the Hill 1948 yield function in the plane stress
condition, which is derived as equation (4).
1
d p = {( F + H )d112 + ( H + G )d222 + 2 Hd11d22 } + 2 d122 (4)
FH + HG + GF N
To avoid the inaccuracy or uncertainty of measured values that DIC might intrinsically
cause, only three significant figures were taken with round-off.
Loading paths of the fracture initiation point were extracted from a surface element of
finite element models used for the hybrid method because the strain was measured on the
surface of a specimen. In the same way as the hybrid method, the average stress
triaxiality and normalised Lode angle were calculated based on equation (3) and are
written down in Table 3 along with the measured fracture surface strain. It is noted that
fracture strains measured with 2D-DIC are smaller than the ones determined through the
hybrid method except a diagonally double-notched specimen since they were measured
on the surface of a specimen, not on the mid-plane where the actual fracture initiation
point lies. However, they can still be a meaningful calibration points. Because their stress
states satisfy the plane stress condition, which prevails in sheet metals, they can play an
important role in predicting the onset of failure with shell finite elements.
Figure 6 represents the tendency of increase in the equivalent plastic strain at the
fracture initiation point for different types of specimens. For easier comparison, the
displacement and the equivalent plastic strain were normalised by their maximum values,
which are the displacement to fracture and the equivalent strain to fracture. For a TSCN
specimen, the equivalent plastic strain evolves through two consecutive increases in the
slope, which correspond to diffuse and localised necking, respectively. A FG specimen
undergoes only one sudden rise in the strain rate caused by localised necking since
adjacent materials prevent the centre point from being deformed in the transverse
direction. A DDN specimen does not show any conspicuous change in the slope, and thus
it can be confirmed that shear-dominated deformation is not accompanied by necking.
These tendencies agree well with the result of finite element simulation exhibited in
Figure 3.
Figure 6 Evolution of the normalised equivalent plastic strain at the fracture initiation point for
three kinds of specimen (see online version for colours)
Fracture modelling of DP780 sheets 43
4 Fracture envelope
A 3
f = c3 + (1 c3 ) sec 1
c2 2 3 6
1 (5)
1 + c12 1
n
cos + c1 + sin
3 6 3 6
This model was extended from the original Mohr-Coulomb criterion, which was
developed for geo-materials, due to its advantage of capturing the effects of both the
stress triaxiality and the Lode angle on ductility. The equivalent plastic strain to fracture
exponentially decays with the increasing stress triaxiality and shows asymmetric
dependency on the normalised Lode angle. A and n are Swift law parameters, and c1, c2,
and c3 should be determined based on the result of ductile fracture tests. A simple
MATLAB code was developed such that the least square difference between equation (5)
and test points in Table 3 is minimised. Figure 7 shows the finally constructed fracture
envelopes in the space of the stress triaxiality, the normalised Lode angle, and the
equivalent plastic strain to fracture. Each point on the fracture envelope indicates the
maximum strain a material can resist in the proportional loading condition, where the
stress parameters, and , are kept constant. Two lines on each envelope correspond to
the plane stress condition, for which the stress triaxiality has a unique relation with the
normalised Lode angle written as equation (6).
27 2 1
= sin (6)
2 3 2
Figure 7 Fracture envelopes constructed with the MMC fracture creation, (a) using the hybrid
method (b) using 2D-DIC (see online version for colours)
(a) (b)
44 K. Pack et al.
As opposed to Figure 7(a), all the calibration points in Figure 7(b) are placed on these
lines, which substantiates that average loading paths of them satisfy the plane stress
condition.
For direct comparison between two fracture envelopes, the two-dimensional fracture
locus satisfying equation (6) was extracted from each envelope and represented in the
space of the stress triaxiality and the equivalent plastic strain to fracture as illustrated in
Figure 8(a). It is noteworthy that there is little difference between two fracture loci, which
verifies the applicability of 2D-DIC to define the onset of failure for DP780. A fracture
locus is not popular with the sheet metal forming community, so it was transformed into a
FFLD, a better-known representation of strain limit in the space of major and minor
strain. The term, Fracture is added in front of the general FLD because this limit of
ductility was defined based on the onset of failure, not on necking. Fig. 8b shows
transformed FFLDs. Five dotted lines in Fig 8a and Fig. 8b refer to representative loading
paths: uniaxial compression, pure-shear, uniaxial tension, plane strain tension, equibiaxial
tension. There are two additional branches from uniaxial compression to uniaxial tension,
which does not appear in a conventional forming limit diagram. Great emphasis is put on
these branches because some researchers report that fracture of advanced high strength
steels sometimes occurs in these regions (Li et al., 2010). Again, two methods predict
similar FFLDs with a trivial discrepancy in the state of plane strain tension, and thus it is
concluded that 2D-DIC can be adopted for the purpose of modelling the fracture of
DP780 sheets.
Figure 8 (a) Fracture locus in the plane stress condition (b) Fracture forming limit diagram
(see online version for colours)
(a) (b)
5 Conclusions
In this study, four kinds of basic ductile fracture tests were carried out in the uniaxial
loading frame to characterise the fracture behaviour of DP780 sheets. Two up-to-date
Fracture modelling of DP780 sheets 45
techniques, the hybrid method and 2D-DIC, were used to define the fracture strain and
identify loading histories all the way to fracture. Based on the established data, two
fracture envelopes of DP780 were constructed with the three-parameter MMC model. For
direct comparison, two-dimensional fracture loci were taken out from each envelope and
transformed into FFLDs as an alternative representation, which show that they are almost
identical. Thus, 2D-DIC without complicated procedures is shown to be applicable to
fracture modelling of DP780 sheets. It is also expected that 2D-DIC can be used to
investigate the dynamic effect on fracture thanks to its simplicity but reasonable
accuracy.
References
Bai, Y. and Wierzbicki, T. (2008) A new model of metal plasticity and fracture with pressure and
Lode dependence, International Journal of Plasticity, Vol. 24, No. 6, pp.10711096.
Bai, Y. and Wierzbicki, T. (2010) Application of extended Mohr-Coulomb criterion to ductile
fracture, International Journal of Fracture, Vol. 161, No. 1, pp.120.
Bao, Y. and Wierzbicki, T. (2004a) A comparative study on various ductile crack formation
criteria, Journal of Engineering and Materials and Technology, Vol. 126, No. 3, pp.314324.
Bao, Y. and Wierzbicki, T. (2004b) On fracture locus in the equivalent strain and stress triaxiality
space, International Journal of Mechanical Sciences, Vol. 46, No. 1, pp.8198.
Beese, A.M., Luo, M., Li, Y., Bai, Y. and Wierzbicki T. (2010) Partially coupled anisotropic
fracture model for aluminium sheets, Engineering Fracture Mechanics, Vol. 77, No. 7,
pp.11281152.
Brozzo, P., Deluca, B. and Rendina, R. (1972) A new method for the prediction of formability in
metal sheets, Proceedings of the 7th Biennial Conference of the International Deep Drawing
Research Group, Zurich, Switzerland.
Clift, S.E., Hartley, P., Sturgess, C.E.N. and Rowe, G.W. (1990) Fracture prediction in plastic
deformation processes, International Journal of Mechanical Sciences, Vol. 32, No. 1,
pp.117.
Cockcroft, M.G. and Latham, D.J. (1968) Ductility and the workability of metals, Journal of the
Institute of Metals, Vol. 96, No. 2, pp.3339.
Dunand, M. and Mohr, D. (2010) Hybrid experimental-numerical analysis of basic ductile fracture
experiments for sheet metals, International Journal of Solids and Structures, Vol. 47, No. 9,
pp.11301143.
Dunand, M. and Mohr, D. (2011) On the predictive capabilities of the shear modified Gurson and
the modified Mohr-Coulomb fracture models over a wide range of stress triaxialities and Lode
angles, Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids, Vol. 59, No. 7, pp.13741394.
Huh, H., Song, J.H. and Lee, H.J. (2012) Dynamic constitutive equation of the auto-body steel
sheet with the variation of temperature, Int. J. Automotive Technology, Vol. 13, No. 1,
pp.4360.
LeRoy, G., Embury, J.D., Edwards, G. and Ashby, M.F. (1981) A model of ductile fracture based
on the nucleation and growth of voids, Acta Metallurgica, Vol. 29, No. 8, pp.15091522.
Li, Y., Luo, M., Gerlach, J. and Wierzbicki, T. (2010) Prediction of shear-induced fracture in sheet
metal forming, Journal of Materials Processing Technology, Vol. 210, No. 14,
pp.18581869.
Lou, Y., Huh, H., Lim, S. and Pack, K. (2012) New ductile fracture criterion for prediction of
fracture forming limit diagrams of sheet metals, International Journal of Solids and
Structures, Vol. 49, No. 25, pp.36053615.
Luo, M. and Wierzbicki, T. (2009) Ductile fracture calibration and validation of anisotropic
aluminium sheets, Proceedings of the SEM Annual Conference, Albuquerque, USA.
46 K. Pack et al.
Luo, M. and Wierzbicki, T. (2010) Numerical failure analysis of a stretch-bending test on dual-
phase steel sheets using a phenomenological fracture model, International Journal of Solids
and Structures, Vol. 47, Nos. 2223, pp.30843102.
Oh, S., Chen, C. and Kobayashi, S. (1979) Ductile failure in axisymmetric extrusion and drawing,
part 2, workability in extrusion and drawing, Journal of Engineering for Industry, Vol. 101,
No. 1, pp.3644.
Wierzbicki, T., Bao, Y., Lee, Y.W. and Bai, Y. (2005) Calibration and evaluation of seven fracture
models, International Journal of Mechanical Sciences, Vol. 47, Nos. 45, pp.719743.