SUMMERY POINTS

We are mentioning herewith the points which were declared as mistake as per
drawings forwarded to us for construction.

1. In the admin office building, there is aluminum window of 8M in the front

elevation of the building, on the other hand, partitioning walls are also attached
to this window. We are unable to understand, how these partitioning walls will
be attached to the window.
2. In the admin office building, PCL has given brickwork of 900MM above the stair
landing and above the 900MM there is window of 1500MM height, now
keeping in mind the total height of the floor, we have to break the already
constructed 1st floor slab and peripheral beam. Same is the case with second
floor too. Kindly clear it.
3. In the admin office building, PCL didnt provide Lintel Beam drawings related
to doors and windows. Upon our emails they provided us drawings of the lintel
beams upto 16feet span whereas the width of the span is 25feet, we again
asked them to provide us relevant drawings. Now as per current drawings
provided by them, they are asking us to stay the lintel beams on the columns
but they didnt instructed us the leave the dowel while constructing the columns.
Now how can we stay lintel beams on the columns?
4. Backside stair structure in main plant building is the scope of IZHAR it was
informed by M/s PCL (Mr. Farhan). Then we contacted M/s Izhar, they totally
refused and asked us to contact M/s PCL and then M/s PCL reacted.
5. While carrying out the work on recycling pool, it was pointed out by us that it
is overlapping with the adjacent pile cap. Then matter cleared by PCL but we
pointed out that mismatch.
6. In the main plant building, brick work detail was not available in the drawing
provided by PCL, later on, on telephonic discussion with Mr. Farhan, PCL
provided brick details but upon studying the same detail was not satisfactory
and again matter was discussed with PCL and gravel filling added under
brickwork upon our advice.
7. Layout plan was furnished to us but it was without coordinates. We were not
in a position to locate the structure on ground. It was again pointed out to PCL
 for the clearance of the same. They furnished the coordinates upon our
insistence.
8. The four columns of washing area which were coming in the main plant
building, the detail of these columns was missing in the drawings provided by
PCL, we contacted PCL for detail of said columns but they were unable to
understand that we are requiring which detail. We clarified the matter to PCL
on telephone and then they sent the same.
9. In structural drawings, 3 septic tanks were of the same size but when we
consulted layout drawings, they were of different sizes. We pointed this
mismatch to PCL for rectification. After rectification in layout drawings, when
we started physical layout of the same manholes, it were overlapping with the
adjacent pile caps.
10. One thing further to be pointed out is that whenever PCL sent us revised
drawings, the revision was not properly marked on the drawing and we
were unable to understand to follow which of the drawing. This was the question
mark for us to work on which particular drawing.
11. We did pile works for pressure filter foundation as per issued drawings by
PCL, later on they intimated that the location of pressure filter foundation is
somewhere different as compared to earlier drawing. Resultantly, shifting came
to lose of financial impact i.e. 15 Nos. piles.
12. On receiving structural drawings for the admin office, we started the work as
per drawing. Later on, we asked for stair structure and upon studying the same,
we found that the foundation of stair is coming from raft foundation which we
had already constructed.