Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
23/02/2012
LOAD CALCULATIONS
As for a conventional variable volume air-conditioning system.
Room design conditions: It is the intention to design a 2-stage evaporative cooling
system for the same internal conditions as we would for
conventional air-conditioning, lets go for:
23.5 oC max / 21.0 oC min
Supply air temperature (Pretoria): Variable volume relies on a constant supply air temperature. In
the case of 2-stage evaporative cooling, this temperature is
determined by the local climate conditions. For Pretoria, we
know that we can get the way, most of the time, with:
17.5 oC unit leaving / 18.5 oC room entering (constant)
Note that this temperature is only there to get a first-pass idea
of the required air quantity. The final equipment capacities will
be simulated through simulation, as will be demonstrated later,
Use peak climate data for ever month. September to May for cooling and June to August for heating.
First pass calculations: subdivide building into areas according to orientation (North-, East-, South-,
West perimeter, Interior, ) and calculate peak air quantity and heating load for every area (room,
zone) plus the peak air quantity for every air handling unit.
Example:
Results for rooms
ROOM AREA AIR HEATING
m2 l/s l/s-m2 W W/m2
Page 1 of 9
Toon Herman 2-Stage Evaporative Cooling Design Guidelines Part 1
23/02/2012
Results for (total of) Air Handling Units (= 2-Stage Evaporative Cooling Units):
ROOM LIST
Name No. Name No.
CB_NO 1 NB_NO 1
CB_EA 1 NB_EA 1
CB_SO 1 NB_SO 1
CB_WE 1 NB_WE 1
CB_INT 1 NB_INT 1
SB_NO 1
SB_EA 1
SB_SO 1
SB_WE 1
SB_INT 1
Total area: 23 280 m2
Climate data used: PEAK Weather for PRETORIA
The plant starts at 7 hr and stops at 19 hr
Unit leaving Dry bulb temperature 17.5 oC
Wet bulb temperature 16.5 oC
Note the Unit air quantity: 190 m 3/s (and this includes 5% leakage). Compare with the sum of the room
peak air quantities: 220 m3/s. Because of the different orientations, the rooms peak at different times.
SIMULATION
The above data are now entered as equipment capacities into a simulation model.
As we have no means of knowing how the space is used from hour to hour, we let the computer
decide. This is done by means of random fluctuations of the occupancy level and of the use of lights,
equipment and shading devices. Because of this, no two consecutive runs of the same simulation are
ever identical, but it is surprising how consistent the results are.
The climate data are now real, typical hourly weather data. Originally, 7 consecutive days were used
per month, to represent the full month. Now, computers are so powerful and fast that there is no
reason not to use the full 365 days of a typical reference year. We now go even one step further:
instead of a reference year, we use several real years and compare the results. From those, a
judgement decision has to be made. There is however little difference from year to year.
Page 2 of 9
Toon Herman 2-Stage Evaporative Cooling Design Guidelines Part 1
23/02/2012
As a minimum, the following climate data are required for every hour: drybulb temperature, relative
humidity and cloud cover. From those, the following type of climate files are derived:
MNTH DAY HR Alt Azim Direct Rad Sky Rad Drybulb Wetbulb
(deg) (deg) (W/m2) (W/m2) (oC) (oC)
.. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. ..
3 4 16 26 285 777 85 27.0 18.2
3 4 17 13 277 531 58 27.8 18.4
3 4 18 0 0 0 0 25.8 19.9
3 4 19 0 0 0 0 22.3 19.7
3 4 20 0 0 0 0 20.3 18.6
3 4 21 0 0 0 0 19.3 17.6
3 4 22 0 0 0 0 18.2 17.0
3 4 23 0 0 0 0 17.5 16.7
3 4 24 0 0 0 0 17.4 16.8
3 5 1 0 0 0 0 16.5 16.1
3 5 2 0 0 0 0 16.3 15.8
3 5 3 0 0 0 0 15.7 15.3
3 5 4 0 0 0 0 15.6 15.0
3 5 5 0 0 0 0 15.5 15.1
3 5 6 0 0 0 0 15.5 15.3
3 5 7 13 83 478 74 17.9 16.0
3 5 8 26 75 466 205 19.4 16.6
3 5 9 39 66 702 220 21.9 18.7
3 5 10 51 52 925 102 24.0 19.5
3 5 11 60 31 946 104 25.6 19.8
3 5 12 64 0 667 362 25.7 19.6
3 5 13 60 329 946 104 27.2 19.9
3 5 14 51 308 832 190 27.6 19.8
3 5 15 39 294 263 301 26.7 19.5
3 5 16 26 285 0 128 22.0 19.6
3 5 17 13 277 0 53 20.7 19.6
3 5 18 0 0 0 0 21.0 19.0
3 5 19 0 0 0 0 20.1 18.9
3 5 20 0 0 0 0 19.6 18.8
3 5 21 0 0 0 0 18.8 17.6
3 5 22 0 0 0 0 19.6 15.6
3 5 23 0 0 0 0 18.6 15.1
3 5 24 0 0 0 0 17.6 15.1
3 6 1 0 0 0 0 16.9 15.3
Etc. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. ..
Page 3 of 9
Toon Herman 2-Stage Evaporative Cooling Design Guidelines Part 1
23/02/2012
below 17.0 oC, return air is introduced and mixed with outside air to achieve the required 17.0 oC.
Typical summer day:
MNTH DAY HR OADB OAWB SAT %DIR %INDIR %OA %RA
Page 4 of 9
Toon Herman 2-Stage Evaporative Cooling Design Guidelines Part 1
23/02/2012
The target supply temperature is not always achievable. For Pretoria, the distribution is as follows:
Operating hours 3 432 hrs
For 10% of the time, the supply temperature will be above 17.0 oC and this will affect the room
temperature.
Investigating this is part of the simulation process.
Room temperatures.
During simulation, the room temperatures are (must be) calculated, both during operating hours and
after hours.
The room temperature is controlled at 22.0 oC 1.0 degC.
Here is an example:
MNTH DAY HR TSA CB_NO CB_EA CB_SO CB_WE CB_INT UNIT
As can be seen, a supply temperature above 17.0 oC does not necessarily have a proportional effect
on the room temperatures.
As it is not practical to study the full model simulation output for every room for every hour of the year,
we have to call on statistics to make sense of the results.
This is shown below.
Page 5 of 9
Toon Herman 2-Stage Evaporative Cooling Design Guidelines Part 1
23/02/2012
In percentages
Room temperature >23.0 0.10% 1.29% 0.50% 0.20% 0.20%
>23.5 0.00% 0.69% 0.10% 0.00% 0.00%
>24.0 0.00% 0.40% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%
>24.5 0.00% 0.10% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%
>25.0 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%
Although the target supply temperature is exceeded for 10% of the time, there is little effect on the
room temperatures. Even the worst room (CB_EA) exceeds 23 oC for only 1.29% of the time.
However, room CB_EA stands out for its high loads and high temperature. See also the load
calculation results on page 1. It is clear that the faade needs to be looked at again. (Remember, this
was only the first pass calculation.)
One can also see from the average temperatures that, most of the year, there is more than sufficient
cooling capacity. Maybe move the setpoint up by a degree and see what happens.
Relative humidity
Relative humidity is of concern with evaporative cooling and should be checked as part of the
simulation process.
Average for the building on a typical summer day:
MNTH DAY HR Temp (oC) Hum (kg/kg) RH (%)
Page 6 of 9
Toon Herman 2-Stage Evaporative Cooling Design Guidelines Part 1
23/02/2012
A day in October:
MNTH DAY HR Temp (oC) Hum (kg/kg) RH (%)
The impact of humidity on comfort is discussed in detail in a separate article Comfort with 2-Stage
Evaporative Cooling, which can be found on this website.
The air demand exceeds the fan capacity for 99 hours (2.9%). The duct pressure might not be
maintained during those periods.
The maximum heating demand is only 68% of the installed capacity.
NOTE: No heating is required in the air handling units.
Page 7 of 9
Toon Herman 2-Stage Evaporative Cooling Design Guidelines Part 1
23/02/2012
Fresh Air
A 2-stage evaporative cooling system is basically an all-outside air system, except when the outside
air drybulb drops below 17.0 oC. Return air is then introduced to mix with outside air in order to
achieve the required supply temperature. There are no heaters in the air handling units and we rely
solely on the heat in the return air. It is therefore necessary to check if the outside air does not drop
below acceptable levels.
Here is a typical example (from the simulation process).
Fresh air statistics
Air-conditioned area: 23 280 m2
Occupation density: 17 m2 per person
Number of people: 1 369
@ 5.0 l/s-person (norm) 6.8 m3/s
No. of hrs exceeded 3 432 100%
@ 7.5 l/s-person (+50%) 10.3 m3/s
No. of hrs exceeded 3 432 100%
@ 10.0 l/s-person (+100%) 13.7 m3/s
No. of hrs exceeded 3 432 100%
@ 12.5 l/s-person (+150%) 17.1 m3/s
No. of hrs exceeded 3 408 99%
@ 15.0 l/s-person 20.5 m3/s
No. of hrs exceeded 3 391 99%
@ 17.5 l/s-person 24.0 m3/s
No. of hrs exceeded 3 378 98%
@ 20.0 l/s-person 27.4 m3/s
No. of hrs exceeded 3 255 95%
@ 25.0 l/s-person 34.2 m3/s
No. of hrs exceeded 3 279 96%
@ 30.0 l/s-person 41.1 m3/s
No. of hrs exceeded 3 197 93%
@ 35.0 l/s-person 47.9 m3/s
No. of hrs exceeded 3 112 91%
@ 40.0 l/s-person 54.8 m3/s
No. of hrs exceeded 3 027 88%
@ 45.0 l/s-person 61.6 m3/s
No. of hrs exceeded 2 962 86%
Page 8 of 9
Toon Herman 2-Stage Evaporative Cooling Design Guidelines Part 1
23/02/2012
Equipment
Page 9 of 9