Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
Paper
TP1165EN.doc Jun-08
Assumptions are included in the total capital costs, using a
percentage of the total equipment cost.
This paper will focus on the last tool: RO plus EDI
versus IX for new projects. Life cycle costs of various Design 1 is a traditional co-current regenerated ion
combinations of these technologies will be exchange system. It contains a Strong Acid Cation
evaluated. A sensitivity study is carried out to vessel followed by a Decarbonator to remove CO2
determine the precise effect of feed and waste (when required) and a Strong Base Anion system.
water cost, feed water salinity (TDS), energy, and Mix Bed ion exchange is used for polishing. Co-
chemical (caustic) costs on the total cost to produce current flow is the simplest IX design. Resin is
high purity water. The tool provides guidance as to regenerated in the same downward direction as the
what combination of technologies is most attractive service flow.
for a new boiler feed water project. Design 1: Co-current Ion Exchange (CFR) or Design 2:
Counter-current Ion Exchange (RFR)
While economic comparisons between membrane
technology and ion exchange have been conducted
in various papers [1-3], most of these comparisons
date back 5 to 10 years. Changes in chemical and
water costs, and new technical developments in MB
SBA SAC
low energy membranes and more efficient IX, and SAC SBA
High
addition of new technologies such as EDI, make it Purity
necessary to update and expand these reject
Water
comparisons.
In this evaluation, typical North American and
European designs, feed waters, and input costs Design 2 is similar to Design 1 but with a packed
have been used. Pretreatment to the RO or IX bed, counter-current regenerated ion exchange
systems is not considered, as it is assumed that the system. In these systems, regenerant is applied in a
water has limited suspended solids (SDI < 3) for all direction opposite to the service flow. This has the
system designs. In any case there would be little advantage of providing better water quality, higher
difference in this pretreatment, so the impact on chemical efficiency, and reduced wastewater flow
economics is modest. Of course, the addition of an (higher water recovery). Most new IX systems are of
ultrafiltration system, clarifier or multi media filter the counter-current design. For both IX options we
must be considered if the feed water has a high applied a safety factor of 0.85 for cation and 0.8 for
fouling potential. This paper is focused on the anion resin to simulate a 5 years operating period.
demineralization steps.
Design 3: Reverse Osmosis + Mixed Bed (RO-MB)
System Design
All designs are assumed to contain industrial grade
equipment using a conservative design philosophy. MB
In all cases, multiple trains are considered with an SAC
SBA
High
N+1 redundancy for the IX systems. The RO and E- Purity
Cell* EDI systems are designed with a minimum reject Water
flow rate of 2 x 80% design flow for the smaller
flows and N+1 redundancy for the larger flows. Design 3 is a Reverse Osmosis system followed by a
Feed water and product water storage are not Decarbonator (when required) and a MB polishing
considered. Storage tanks and distribution pumps unit. The RO is equipped with standard medium
between unit operations are included, when pressure membrane elements. The mixed bed unit
required. All systems are designed to achieve a final requires a chemical regeneration facility, bulk
product water quality of < 0.1 S/cm conductivity storage tanks, and neutralization facilities similar to
with silica and sodium levels each < 10 ppb. design 1 and 2.
Equipment installation and commissioning costs
NaOH NaOH
softener
sAC
High High
reject Purity reject Purity
Water Water
Design 4 is a sodium cycle ion exchange softener Design 6 considers the use of double pass RO.
(when required) followed by a RO and final polishing Permeate of the 1st RO is used to feed the 2nd RO.
by an E-Cell EDI system. Softening the RO feed Caustic can be dosed between the passes to
water results in several advantages for RO convert CO2 to Bicarbonate to reduce the CO2 level
operation: reduced fouling, higher recovery, higher in the 2nd pass RO permeate. Final polishing is
specific flux and the option to raise feed pH to accomplished with an E-Cell unit. The double pass
reduce CO2 levels in the permeate. The concentrate design provides great flexibility in the salinity of the
of the E-Cell unit is re-circulated back to the front of feed water that can be tolerated (i.e. up to 10,000
the RO. ppm or higher).
Table 1 provides the water analyses used for the IX- Regenerant dosage H2SO4 (100%) NaOH (100%)
comparisons. Case 1 is a low TDS water, at 48.8 Co-current (CFR) 6 lb/ft3 5 lb/ft3
ppm as CaCO3 (0.98 meq/l), which is typical in the
Northern parts of Europe or North America. In Case Counter-current (RFR) 5 lb/ft3 4 lb/ft3
2 to 5 salinity gradually increases to 488.9 ppm as Mixed Bed 8 lb/ft3 8 lb/ft3
CaCO3 (9.78 meq/l). Case 5 could be a typical well
water in a coastal area with some seawater RO Feed Pressure ( psi ) With GE PRO membranes
intrusion. Case 4, with a feed water TDS of 292.7 Design 3 (RO one Pass) 230.8
ppm as CaCO3 (5.85 meq/l), is the base water
analysis used for the initial evaluations prior to the Design 4 (RO one Pass) 302.8 Includes E-Cell
sensitivity studies. Design 5 (RO one Pass) 230.8
Cost ( $ )
1,000,000
Cation, resin cleaners will not be required 5,520
750,000
Anion, resin cleaners and or brine squeeze will not 4,590 500,000
be required 250,000
Labor savings in possible personnel reallocation 44,029 Annualized Site specific savings on Operation
Annualized Site specific savings on Capital & Inst.
Total 81,480 Annual financing cost
Net annual operating cost
900,000
Table 3: Estimated Site Specific saving, Membrane
800,000
versus IX design 700,000
600,000
Cost ( $ )
500,000
The system flow rates that have been evaluated are 400,000
300,000
110, 242, 440, 1100 and 2642 usgpm, which cover
200,000
the flow rate of most industrial boiler systems. 100,000
0
The flow rate of 440 usgpm is used for the
1 2 3 4 5 6
sensitivity analysis. Design
2.50
The base case assumes a relatively low water and
2.00
waster water cost of $0.76/1000 usg and $0.19
1.50
/1000 usg respectively. Despite this low water cost
1.00 it represents a significant portion of the overall cost
0.50 in all cases. For the IX designs water cost is lower
0.00 due to the higher recovery compared to the
1 2 3 4 5 6 membrane designs. Energy consumption is higher
Design
for the membrane designs but chemicals
consumption is lower compared to the IX designs.
Fig. 3: Produced water cost per Kusg for base case
Figs. 5 to 7 show the capital and operating cost
Fig. 4 provides a detailed breakdown of the total numbers for the base case TDS of 293 ppm as
cost to produce water. Water cost includes the feed CaCO3 (5.85 meq/l). Fig. 5 shows the effect of
water plus the cost to dispose of the wastewater. system flow rate. Note the effect on operating cost
For the IX options, the chemicals cost includes the is quite small for all system designs.
acid and caustic for regeneration, plus the cost for
neutralization and resin cleaning. Energy cost 3 .50
of resin replacement.
$/1000 usg
2 .0 0
$/1000 usg
options, the cost is more linear with flow rate. 3 .0 0
2 .0 0
15,000
Design 1 Design 2
1.0 0
12,000 Design 3 Design 4
$ per installed usgpm
Design 5 Design 6
0 .0 0
9,000
110 242 440 110 1 2642
Flow rate usgpm
6,000
5.50
5.00
Design 1 Design 2 Design 3
4.50
Design 4 Design 5 Design 6
4.00
6.00
$/1000 usg
3.50
5.50
3.00
5.00
2.50
4.50
2.00
4.00
1. 5 0
$/1000 usg
3.50
1. 0 0
3.00
0.50
2.50
0.00
2.00 0 50 10 0 15 0 200 250 300 350 400 450 500 550
1. 5 0
TDS PPM as CaCO3
1. 0 0
0.50
Fig. 9: Cost per 1000 usg versus TDS for 2642
0.00
0 50 10 0 15 0 200 250 300 350 400 450 500 550 usgpm
TDS PPM as CaCO3
Fig. 8: Cost per 1000 usg versus TDS for 440 usgpm
$/1000 usg
For the highest cost membrane design 6 (2RO-EDI)
the break-even point is at TDS 210 ppm as CaCO3
(4.2 meq/l) for a 440 usgpm flow rate and at TDS 2.00
shift relative to each other with increasing flow rate. TDS PPM as CACO3
The reason is that the cost lines are not smooth Fig. 10: Cost per 1000 usg versus TDS for 110
curves. This is caused by the need for additional usgpm
equipment at higher feed water TDS levels.
At a higher CO2 level a decarbonator is often At higher flow rate this changes as is shown in fig.
needed and a softener might be required when feed 11. Above a TDS of 150 ppm as CaCO3 (3 meq/l) the
water total hardness increases. MB option is more attractive than the E-Cell options
at a flow rate of 1100 usgpm.
This additional equipment obviously affects the
water cost. Design 1 Design 2 Design 3
Design 4 Design 5 Design 6
Fig. 10 provides a close up view of the membrane
options at a flow rate of 110 usgpm. It shows that 3.00
$/1000 usg
versus IX options. 4.00
3.50
2.50
chemical cost. The cost of NaOH has more than 2.00
tripled in most geographies since 2004. The 1.50
resulting effect on the Ion Exchange options is 1.00
considerable. 0.50
0.00
Figure 12 shows the result of varying the cost of 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 500 550
TDS PPM as CaCO3
NaOH from $ 0.18 to 0.36 per lb, for a 100%
solution. This represents the current range in NaOH
Fig. 12: Effect of NaOH costing on water cost for
costs worldwide. For comparison, data is provided
440 usgpm
for the lowest NaOH cost reported in 2004, which
was $ 0.045 /lb.
The effect of NaOH cost for the membrane options Break-even point TDS PPM as CaCO3
is small. For this reason, and for simplicity only the $
0.27/lb cost numbers are shown. Comparing the NaOH Cost ($/lb) 0.18 0.27 0.36
lowest cost IX design 2 with the highest cost Design 3 110 75 <50
membrane design 6 the break-even point ranges
Design 4 60 <50 <50
from TDS of 135 to 225 ppm as CaCO3 (2.7 to 4.5
meq/l). Design 5 110 75 50
For all other membrane designs the break-even Design 6 225 160 135
point is at TDS 75 ppm as CaCO3 (1.5 meq/l) or
Table 4: Break-even point at varying NaOH cost
below as is shown in table 4 for a NaOH cost of $
0.27/lb. comparing membrane designs vs. design 2
This is one of the reasons why there has been a Table 5 shows a range of 50 to 160 ppm TDS as
clear shift towards membrane technology during CaCO3 (1.0 to 3.2 meq/l) for design 4 and 5.
recent years, not only for high TDS waters, but now,
for the first time, also for low TDS waters.
5.00
4.50
4.00
Fig. 14: Effect of Raw Water cost on produced water
3.50 cost for 440 usgpm flow rate
3.00
$/1000 usg
2.50
Break-even point TDS PPM as CaCO3
2.00
RW Cost ($/1000 usg) 0.19 0.76 1.89 3.79
1.50
Design 3 50 100 160 250
1.00
Design 4 <50 70 100 200
0.50
Design 5 65 110 185 280
0.00
0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 500 550 Design 6 180 215 285 340
TDS PPM as CaCO3
Fig. 13: Effect of Electricity cost on water cost for Table 6: Break-even point at varying raw water cost
440 usgpm flow rate of membrane designs vs. design 2
Fig. 14 provides the cost of produced water with a The impact of the waste water cost is less dramatic
raw water cost ranging from $ 0.19 to 3.79 / 1000 on the produced water cost than the raw water
usg for options 2 and 6. The wastewater cost is kept cost but if both the raw water cost and waste water
constant in this graph at the base case value of $ cost increase simultaneously the effect is large as is
0.19 / 1000 usg. shown in fig. 15.
2.10
$/1000 usg
Table 7: Break-even point at varying raw water and Fig. 16: Effect of membrane selection on produced
wastewater cost of membrane designs vs. design 2 water cost for 440 usgpm flow rate
Design 6 - PRO - Electr. $ 0.06/kWh Design 6 - PRO - Electr. $ 0.12/kWh Low electricity cost.
5.00
Design 6 - PRO LE - Electr. $ 0.06/kWh Design 6 - PRO LE - Electr. $ 0.12/kWh
4. If one or more of the last 4 conditions apply, the
4.50
break-even point favoring the membrane
4.00 designs versus ion exchange could be as low as
TDS of approx. 50 ppm as CaCO3 (1.0 meq/l) or
$/1000 usg
3.50
100 S/cm conductivity.
3.00
References
1. P.A. Newell, S.P. Wrigley, P. Sehn and S.S.
Whipple, An Economic Comparison of Reverse
Osmosis and Ion Exchange in Europe, Ion
Exchange Developments and Applications, p.
58-66, Proceedings of IEX 96, Royal Society of
Chemistry
2. S. Whipple, E. Ebach and S. Beardsley, UltraPure
Water, October 1987
3. Beardsley, S., Coker, S., and Whipple, S., The
Economocs of Reverse Osmosis and Ion
Exchange, paper presented at WATERTECH 94,
Nov 9-11, 1994
4. Rohm and Haas, IXCalc Ion Exchange Design
Software
5. Owens DL, Practical Principals of Ion Exchange
water treatment, Tall Oaks Publishing Inc., 1985
6. BetzDearborn Handbook of Industrial Water
Conditioning, 9th edition 1991
7. R. Gerard, H. Hachisuka, M. Hirose, Desalination
119 (1998) 47-55
8. Strathmann H., Membrane and Membrane
Separation Processes Ellmanns Encyclopedia
of Industrial Chemistry, (2005),
http://mrw.intersience.wiley.com [2008-2-15]
9. Bornak W, Ion Exchange deionization for
industrial users, Tall Oaks Publishing Inc., 2003
Capital & Operating Cost evaluation RO-EDI versus Demin - Mixed bed
Raw water analysis Fill in yellow cells Select the unit system you want to use: 1 1=US , 2=Metric Euro , 3= Metric $
Water source City Equipment selection for Demin system, Mixed Bed, RO, Softener & E-Cell
PPM PPM / mg/l meq/l System criteria
ions mg/l ion as CACO3 Please enter the average High Purity Water Production 440.3 usgpm
Calcium 45.00 112.5 2.25 The system calculation takes into account that one unit is always on standby
Magnesium 12.00 49.4 0.99 ( Demin train, Mixed bed, Softener, RO & E-cell )
Sodium 60.00 130.80 2.62 A decarbonator will be selected if flow > 99 usgpm and M alk (as CaCO3) > 59 ppm
Potassium 0.00 0 0.00 Decarbonator will be in place? 1 1 = Yes, 0 = No Type 1
+2
Iron Fe 0.00 0.00 0.00 Regeneration effluent will be neutralised? 1 1 = Yes, 0 = No
+2
Mangenese Mn 0.00 0.00 0.00 What kind of acid will be used? 2 1 = HCl, 2 = H2SO4
Lead 0 0.00 0.00 Demin system: capacity based on Rohm & Haas resin SAC IR1200, SBA IRA4200
Barium 0 0.00 0.00 Regenerants dosage CFR Acid 6.0 lb/ft3 Caustic 5.0 lb/ft3
Strontium 0 0.00 0.00 Regenerants dosage RFR Acid 5.0 lb/ft3 Caustic 4.0 lb/ft3
Aluminium 0 0.00 0.00 Regenerants pricing Acid 0.05 $/lb Caustic 0.18 $/lb
Chloride 76.2 107.40 2.15 Resin life expectation Cations 6 years Anions 4 years
Sulfate 60.0 62.36 1.25 Water cost Raw water 0.76 $/Kusg Waste 0.19 $/Kusg
HCO3- M Alkalinity 150.0 123.0 2.46 Safety factor for resin capacity SAC 0.85 SBA 0.80
Fluoride 0.00 0.00 0.00 Mixed Beds system :
Nitrate 0.00 0.00 0.00 Regenerants dosage Acid 8.0 lb/ft3 Caustic 8.0 lb/ft3
pH 7.10 Resin life expectation Cations 5 years Anions 5 years
Silica 10.00 8.30 0.17 Equipment Ammortization Period, months 240 Interest Rate, % 7%
CO2 19.49 22.21 0.44 Equipment installation cost express as % of capital cost Demin 40% RO + EDI 25%
Calculated TDS 413.12 RO to MB or Softener one pass % Recovery 75% PSI increase 230.80 psi
Conductivity mmhos 590 Softener to RO - one pass % Recovery 85% PSI increase 302.80 psi
TOC - ppm 1.10 Two pass - RO - fisrt pass % Recovery 75% PSI increase 253.80 psi
NTU - Turbidity 1.2 Two pass - RO - second pass % Recovery 85% PSI increase 390.35 psi
TSS - ppm 1.0 Select the type of RO membranes to be used 1 Pro RO 365 Pump efficiency % 65%
Total Cation 292.720 5.85 AVERAGE water temperature 59.0 F Motor efficiency % 95%
Total Anion 292.708 5.85 Anion regen, energy cost Fuel Cost, $/MM BTU 8.50 Electricity cost 0.06 $/Kwh
Charge balance 0.00% MK-3 System Parameters E-cell Energy consum. 1-Pass 0.760 KWh/Kusg
Adjusted Chloride value to be enter in cell C20 76.18 Stack life expectation 7 years Energy consum. 2-Pass 0.380 KWh/Kusg
TEC 292.720 5.85 Rectifier efficiency % 70% 40% - 95% Target Resistivity (Mohm.cm)
TEA 324.322 6.49 Rectifier DC output (Volts) 300 300 or 400 VDC 10 1-18 MW cm
Option # colored in red : This option is not recommended, ( TDS going into the E-Cell is too high )
Including the site specific savings impact on Capital & Operating Cost
Annual Operating cost Annual
Capital cost +
including project cost & Operating $/1000 usg
installation cost financing cost only
Options Systems produced
Option -1- Conventional demin system ( CFR ) follow by mixed bed 1,981,300 $ 847,100 $ 662,800 3.66 $
Option -2- Amberpack demin system ( RFR ) follow by mixed bed 1,949,500 $ 729,400 $ 548,000 3.15 $
Option -3- RO system ( 1 Pass ) followed by Mixed Bed 1,299,083 $ 454,304 $ 333,464 1.96 $
Option -4- Softener - RO system ( 1 Pass ) followed by E-cell 860,715 $ 435,120 $ 355,020 1.88 $
Option -5- RO system ( 1 Pass ) - Softener followed by E-cell 913,315 $ 433,720 $ 348,720 1.87 $
Option -6- RO two pass system followed by E-cell 1,107,415 $ 547,580 $ 444,580 2.37 $
2,500,000
2,000,000
1,500,000
1,000,000
500,000
0
1 2 3 4 5 6
Options
800,000
700,000
600,000
500,000
400,000
300,000
200,000
100,000
0
1 2 3 4 5 6
Options
4.00
3.50
3.00
2.50
2.00
1.50
1.00
0.50
0.00
1 2 3 4 5 6
Options
4.00
3.50
3.00
2.50
2.00
1.50
1.00
0.50
0.00
1 2 3 4 5 6
Options
50.0%
45.0%
40.0%
35.0%
30.0%
25.0%
20.0%
15.0%
10.0%
5.0%
0.0%
1 2 3 4 5 6
Water 26.2% 27.8% 48.7% 43.2% 47.9% 41.5%
Chemicals 40.8% 35.0% 9.1% 10.6% 5.3% 6.3%
Energy 8.4% 9.2% 13.5% 16.1% 16.0% 24.9%
Equipment consumables 3.1% 3.4% 4.5% 11.1% 10.9% 8.1%
Annualized Equipment 21.5% 24.5% 24.3% 19.0% 20.0% 19.2%
18.4% 0.29%
99.4 100.6 18.61% 1.29
Reject usgpm Reject Total usgpm usgpm Reject
Equipment selection Capital cost Annual Operating cost Cost $/1000 usg produced
Demin system # of units Cost Water cost 225,300 $ 0.974 $
-raw water 215,300 $ 0.930 $
SAC-CFR-96-S 3 335,200 $ -Waste water 10,000 $ 0.043 $
PRO-FDD-60 PRE Decarbonator 1 46,100 $ Treated water pumps electricity 18,100 $ 0.078 $
SBA-CFR-72-S 3 298,400 $ DM-Regenerant (acid & caustic) 332,200 $ 1.436 $
Anion regeneration Energy cost 40,100 $ 0.173 $
Acid & caustic pumps skid 2 144,400 $ Demin-Neutralization cost Caustic 0 $ 0.000 $
Acid & NaOH tanks 2 107,500 $ Demin- Resin replacement 22,300 $ 0.096 $
Neutralisation tank 1 100,000 $ Decarbonator - Electricity 13,900 $ 0.060 $
PLC 1 36,800 $ MB-Regenerant (acid & caustic) 5,800 $ 0.025 $
PRO-MB-60-S 3 333,100 $ MB-Neutralization cost Acid 500 $ 0.002 $
Blower 1 13,700 $ MB - Resin replacement 4,600 $ 0.020 $
Total equipment 1,415,200 $ Total annual operating cost 662,800 $ 2.864 $
Installation cost 566,100 $ Annualized project Equipment Cost 184,300 $ 0.796 $
Total equipment + installation 1,981,300 $ Total annual oper. including Project cost 847,100 $ 3.661 $
All calculations are done pre-tax. No credit is calculated for the decreased tax effect of the depreciation stream.
For full accounting of the project, after-tax, consult your customer accounting department for their incremental tax rate and treatment of depreciation.
Equipment selection Capital cost Annual Operating cost Cost $/1000 usg produced
Demin system # of units Cost Water cost 205,800 $ 0.889 $
-raw water 199,700 $ 0.863 $
SAC-AP-72-S 3 294,200 $ -Waste water 6,100 $ 0.026 $
PRO-FDD-60 PRE Decarbonator 1 46,100 $ Treated water pumps electricity 16,800 $ 0.073 $
SBA-AP-60-S 3 279,500 $ DM-Regenerant (acid & caustic) 245,300 $ 1.060 $
Anion regeneration Energy cost 37,400 $ 0.162 $
Acid & caustic pumps skid 2 131,700 $ Demin-Neutralization cost Acid 700 $ 0.003 $
Acid & NaOH tanks 2 107,500 $ Demin- Resin replacement 20,400 $ 0.088 $
Resin BackWash Tank 2 64,900 $ Decarbonator pump - Electricity 13,900 $ 0.060 $
Neutralisation tank 1 85,000 $ MB-Regenerant (acid & caustic) 2,900 $ 0.013 $
PLC 1 36,800 $ MB-Neutralization cost Acid 200 $ 0.001 $
PRO-MB-60-S 3 333,100 $ MB - Resin replacement 4,600 $ 0.020 $
Blower 1 13,700 $
Total equipment 1,392,500 $ Total annual operating cost 548,000 $ 2.368 $
Installation cost 557,000 $ Annualized project Equipment Cost 181,400 $ 0.784 $
Total equipment + installation 1,949,500 $ Total annual oper. including Project cost 729,400 $ 3.152 $
All calculations are done pre-tax. No credit is calculated for the decreased tax effect of the depreciation stream.
For full accounting of the project, after-tax, consult your customer accounting department for their incremental tax rate and treatment of depreciation.
592.7 0.97%
usgpm 4.26
% Recovery Reject 25% usgpm Reject to waste
RO pressure 230.80 75% 148.2 usgpm Decarbonator 152.44 Total Reject RO + MB
psi RO reject to waste 25.7%
Equipment selection Capital cost Annual Operating cost Cost $/1000 usg produced
RO system # of units Cost Water cost 251,100 $ 1.085 $
-raw water 235,900 $ 1.019 $
Chemical injection skid ( 2 products ) 1 8,000 $ -Waste water 15,200 $ 0.066 $
PRO-300 2 306,300 $ Treated water pumps electricity 8,800 $ 0.038 $
CIP skid for RO cleaning 1 9,400 $ RO Power Cost (electricity) 50,800 $ 0.220 $
PRO-FDD-60 PRE Decarbonator 1 46,100 $ RO chemicals cost (antiscalant + dechlore) 19,000 $ 0.082 $
PRO-MB-60-S 3 333,100 $ Membranes chemical cleaning cost 6,000 $ 0.026 $
Acid & caustic pumps skid 2 131,700 $ Membranes replacement cost 13,000 $ 0.056 $
Acid & NaOH tanks 2 107,500 $ Cartridge filters replacement 5,500 $ 0.024 $
Neutralisation tank 1 85,000 $ Decarbonator pump electricity 9,900 $ 0.043 $
PLC 1 36,800 $ MB-Regenerant (acid & caustic) 19,200 $ 0.083 $
Blower 1 13,700 $ MB-Neutralization cost Acid 2,600 $ 0.011 $
Total equipment 1,077,600 $ MB - Resin replacement 4,600 $ 0.020 $
Installation cost 269,400 $ Total annual operating cost 390,500 $ 1.687 $
Total equipment + installation 1,347,000 $ Annualized project Equipment Cost 125,300 $ 0.541 $
Total annual oper. including Project cost 515,800 $ 2.229 $
All calculations are done pre-tax. No credit is calculated for the decreased tax effect of the depreciation stream.
For full accounting of the project, after-tax, consult your customer accounting department for their incremental tax rate and treatment of depreciation.
Treated
Water Tank Option -4- Softener - RO system ( 1 Pass ) followed by E-cell
556.4
usgpm 463.5 High Purity
3 # of units 2 463.5 usgpm usgpm Water produced
softener S84-VN-S PRO-300 Permeate 440.3 usgpm
sAC NaOH inj. Recirc. 2
Conc. GEMK3-24
3.0%
531.3 13.90 2.00%
Reject usgpm usgpm 9.27
25.1 % Recovery Reject 15% usgpm Reject electrolyte to waste
usgpm RO pressure 302.80 85% 81.8 usgpm 116.16 Total Reject Softener + RO + E-Cell
4.5% psi RO reject to waste 20.9%
13.90 usgpm
Equipment selection Capital cost Annual Operating cost Cost $/1000 usg produced
Softener # of units Cost Water cost 233,000 $ 1.007 $
S84-VN-S 3 123,700 $ -raw water 221,400 $ 0.957 $
-Waste water 11,600 $ 0.050 $
RO system Treated water pumps electricity 14,500 $ 0.063 $
Chemical injection skid ( 2 products ) 1 8,000$ Softener Salt cost 29,300 $ 0.127 $
caustic pump skid 1 4,000 $ Softener- Resin replacement 3,500 $ 0.015 $
PRO-300 2 306,300 $ RO- Caustic injection cost 8,700 $ 0.038 $
CIP skid for RO cleaning 1 9,400 $ RO Power Cost 61,400 $ 0.265 $
RO chemicals cost (antiscalant + dechlore) 13,300 $ 0.057 $
E-Cell Membranes chemical cleaning cost 6,000 $ 0.026 $
GEMK3-24 2 428,800 $ Membranes replacement cost 13,000 $ 0.056 $
Cartridge filters replacement 5,500 $ 0.024 $
Total equipment 880,200 $ E-Cell Power Cost 10,600 $ 0.046 $
Installation cost 220,100 $ E-Cell replacement Cost 37,700 $ 0.163 $
Total equipment + installation 1,100,300 $ Total annual operating cost 436,500 $ 1.886 $
Annualized project Equipment Cost 102,400 $ 0.442 $
Total annual oper. including Project cost 538,900 $ 2.329 $
All calculations are done pre-tax. No credit is calculated for the decreased tax effect of the depreciation stream.
For full accounting of the project, after-tax, consult your customer accounting department for their incremental tax rate and treatment of depreciation.
Equipment selection Capital cost Annual Operating cost Cost $/1000 usg produced
RO system # of units Cost Water cost 257,300 $ 1.112 $
-raw water 240,900 $ 1.041 $
Chemical injection skid ( 2 products ) 1 8,000 $ -Waste water 16,400 $ 0.071 $
PRO-300 2 306,300 $ Treated water pumps electricity 9,200 $ 0.040 $
CIP skid for RO cleaning 1 9,400 $ RO Power Cost 53,100 $ 0.229 $
PRO-FDD-60 PRE Decarbonator 1 46,100 $ RO chemicals cost (antiscalant + dechlore) 19,800 $ 0.086 $
Softener Membranes chemical cleaning cost 6,000 $ 0.026 $
S84-VN-S 3 123,700 $ Membranes replacement cost 13,000 $ 0.056 $
E-Cell Cartridge filters replacement 5,500 $ 0.024 $
GEMK3-24 2 428,800 $ Decarbonator pump electricity 12,900 $ 0.056 $
Softener Salt cost 2,700 $ 0.012 $
Softener- Resin replacement 2,400 $ 0.010 $
Total equipment 922,300$ E-Cell Power Cost 10,600 $ 0.046 $
Installation cost 230,600 $ E-Cell replacement Cost 37,700 $ 0.163 $
Total equipment + installation 1,152,900 $ Total annual operating cost 430,200 $ 1.859 $
Annualized project Equipment Cost 107,300 $ 0.464 $
Total annual oper. including Project cost 537,500 $ 2.323 $
All calculations are done pre-tax. No credit is calculated for the decreased tax effect of the depreciation stream.
For full accounting of the project, after-tax, consult your customer accounting department for their incremental tax rate and treatment of depreciation.
Equipment selection Capital cost Annual Operating cost Cost $/1000 usg produced
RO system # of units Cost Water cost 270,200 $ 1.168 $
-raw water 251,200 $ 1.085 $
Chemical injection skid ( 2 products ) 1 8,000 $ -Waste water 19,000 $ 0.082 $
First Pass RO Treated water pumps electricity 9,380 $ 0.041 $
GE PRO-450-PRE-FRP-60 2 422,300 $ RO Fisrt pass Power Cost 68,600 $ 0.296 $
caustic pump skid 1 4,000 $ RO Second pass Power Cost 79,100 $ 0.342 $
Second Pass RO RO Power Cost 147,700 $ 0.638 $
GE PRO-300-PRE-FRP-60 2 306,300 $ RO chemicals cost (antiscalant + dechlore) 20,200 $ 0.087 $
CIP skid for RO cleaning 1 10,800 $ RO 2- Caustic injection cost 8,680 $ 0.038 $
E-Cell Membranes chemical cleaning cost 12,100 $ 0.052 $
GEMK3-15 2 326,200 $ Membranes replacement cost 28,700 $ 0.124 $
Cartridge filters replacement 7,300 $ 0.032 $
Total equipment 1,077,600 $ E-Cell Power Cost 5,300 $ 0.023 $
Installation cost 269,400 $ E-Cell replacement Cost 16,500 $ 0.071 $
Total equipment + installation 1,347,000 $ Total annual operating cost 526,060 $ 2.273 $
Annualized project Equipment Cost 125,300 $ 0.541 $
Total annual oper. including Project cost 651,360 $ 2.815 $
All calculations are done pre-tax. No credit is calculated for the decreased tax effect of the depreciation stream.
For full accounting of the project, after-tax, consult your customer accounting department for their incremental tax rate and treatment of depreciation.
4,590 Anion, resin cleaners and or brine squeeze, will not be needed anymore