0 valutazioniIl 0% ha trovato utile questo documento (0 voti)
41 visualizzazioni2 pagine
A video news service sued YouTube for allowing its users to upload copyrighted video footage. The RIAA and MPAA trot out their spokespeople at conferences, repeating their talking points. Your freedom runs up against intellectual property (IP) in each of these instances.
A video news service sued YouTube for allowing its users to upload copyrighted video footage. The RIAA and MPAA trot out their spokespeople at conferences, repeating their talking points. Your freedom runs up against intellectual property (IP) in each of these instances.
Copyright:
Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
Formati disponibili
Scarica in formato DOC, PDF, TXT o leggi online su Scribd
A video news service sued YouTube for allowing its users to upload copyrighted video footage. The RIAA and MPAA trot out their spokespeople at conferences, repeating their talking points. Your freedom runs up against intellectual property (IP) in each of these instances.
Copyright:
Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
Formati disponibili
Scarica in formato DOC, PDF, TXT o leggi online su Scribd
July 17, 2006 YouTube Sued YouTube has been sued in federal court for copyright infringement. A Los Angeles video news service sued YouTube Inc. on Friday in federal court for allowing its users to upload copyrighted video footage onto the popular Web site, including the... [Read more] July 11, 2006 YouTube and Copyright The Hollywood Reporter Esq. (a new publication aimed at entertainment industry lawyers, but interesting to cyberlaw types, as well) asked me to write a short piece describing YouTube's relationship to copyright law. Many people have wondered whether YouTube may be... [Read more] July 11, 2006 Frequently Awkward Questions for the Entertainment Industry The RIAA and MPAA trot out their spokespeople at conferences and public events all over the country, repeating their misleading talking points. Innovators are pirates, fair use is theft, the sky is falling, up is down, and so on. Their... [Read more]
All IP posts from DeepLinks »
EFF's IP archive » Full list of cases, subdirectories, and documents You'd like to move the tracks you bought from Rhapsody to a personal stereo like Apple's iPod, but the copy protection prevents you. Creating or using the software necessary to make the switch could put you behind bars. You want to distribute your hip hop band's music, but the P2P system that's revolutionized your ability to reach listeners is being sued out of existence, a company claiming to own a patent to all streaming media technology is demanding licensing fees, and record labels are breathing down your neck over the samples you've looped. You want to criticize Vivendi Universal on your website or blog, but the plug's been pulled on your "vivendisucks" domain name because of its unflattering reference to the company's trademark. You want to build an open-source video recorder, but threats of a "broadcast flag" technology mandate are driving the TV tuners you need off the market. In each of these instances and many more, your freedom runs up against intellectual property (IP). IP serves important public purposes: encouraging creativity (copyrights) and innovation (patents and trade secrets) and protecting the public from being defrauded by misleading advertising (trademarks). At the same time, IP must be carefully limited to protect your rights to create, access, and distribute information, as well as to develop new ways to do so. In the move from analog to digital, offline to online, this delicate balance is becoming dangerously tilted, as legislators, courts, and IP holders push for ratcheting up IP rights. EFF fights to preserve balance and ensure that the Internet and digital technologies continue to empower you as a consumer, creator, innovator, scholar, and citizen.