Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
EDCI 5550
Dr. Burrows
June 23, 2017
Book Review EDCI 5550
communication of successful and unsuccessful practices among peers in order to provide a better
service. Doug Lemov, in his work Teach Like a Champion 2.0, posits that in its ideal execution,
the act of teaching ought to include the finesse of being an art while simultaneously include the
practiced methodology of being a science. In order to supplement and demonstrate this point, he
also provides report on 62 techniques that he has witnessed through inspecting successful
teachers in their classrooms. Lemovs intention in accumulating data on these techniques and
sharing them is to communicate successful methods to other teachers so that they may benefit
from them. The following review will examine several of those concepts, techniques, and
Throughout his work, Lemov refers to the idea of developing a culture in the classroom.
One type of culture that he describes frequently is the Culture of Error, where the educator
establishes a tone and understanding in their classroom in which students can feel comfortable
not only making mistakes, but admitting to them as well. Lemov illustrates this, stating once
this Culture of Error is created, once its safe to be wrong, students are as likely as not to want to
expose their mistakes to their teacher. This shift from defensiveness or denial to openness is
critical (63). Not only does a Culture of Error create an air of openness in a classroom, but it
corrected- and it enables the educator to be able to help them do so. The Culture of Error helps
the educator by revealing the honest level of understanding of their students without having their
students attempt to cover up mistakes and, in doing so, giving a false front of proficiency. Lemov
also provides examples of how one might go about encouraging a Culture of Error among them
and their students. He describes one case of Culture of Error where a teacher, Katie, provides
Excellence questions to her students each day of the week, keeps note of wrong answers
during the first four days, but only grades the questions assigned on Friday (63). This
simultaneously encourages students to admit their errors, ask questions regarding what they did
wrong, as well as gives the educator necessary insight regarding what students are grasping and
what needs to be gone over in more detail. Lemov goes further, describing how Katie establishes
a Culture of Error long run, stating in terms of long-term investment in Culture of Error, Katie
notes, In the beginning of the year, I praise students who are brave enough to ask questions
(65). Making sure that students know that it is acceptable to make errors and are encouraged to
share them from the onset of the class is, according to Lemov, imperative.
As described in the Culture of Error, students themselves also play a role in setting a tone
of error acceptance in a classroom. That said, it is up to the educator to instruct them how to
contribute appropriately towards the Culture of Error. Lemov writes shaping how students
respond to one anothers struggles is therefore a must (66). In order to foster a Culture of Error
among ones students, expectations and guidelines for protocol concerning peer error must be
established at the beginning of the school year and touched upon when violated. Lemov tells
teachers to explain how you expect them to act when someone struggles with the rationale,
practice those expected behaviorsand when a breech inevitably occurs, reset the culture firmly,
but with understanding (66). The concept of a Culture of Error appears to be increasingly
important to Lemov as he references it frequently not only in the chapter where it is introduced,
but throughout the book. In order to have success in any of the techniques that Lemov writes
about, it is clear that he believes that one must have in place that Culture of Error.
Another culture that Lemov describes is a culture of rigor, or, Academic Ethos.
Regarding rigor in the classroom, Lemov writes champion teachers are always pushing to create
an environment in which the maximum level of academic rigor is expected, practiced, and
valued (81). In order to cultivate such high expectations for ones class, Lemov provides
suggestions in forms of techniques as well as the principle of rigorous learning material yields a
rigorous classroom. Says Lemov it is very hard to have a rigorous lesson or rigorous classroom
without rigorous content (81). This is key to the concept of a culture of rigor as it sets the tone
The techniques that Lemov describes to set high academic expectations include No Opt
Out, Right is Right, Stretch It, and Without Apology. The No Opt Out technique
encourages students to answer the question to the best of their knowledge- whether they know
the answer or not. This harkens back to the Culture of Error as it would be necessary to have
acceptance of wrong answers in this practice. In the No Opt Out technique, educators politely
hold expectations for an answer stalwart even when students claim they do not know the answer.
Lemov explains how this is beneficial, stating No Opt Out can help ensure that all students,
especially reluctant ones, take responsibility for learning (88). Demanding an answer
The Right is Right technique utilizes part of the No Opt Out technique as it stresses that
an educator ought to hold out for the completely correct answer, rather than filling in the rest of
an answer if the student only delivers part of it. Lemov describes this as a common teacher habit
this case, the student is not learning and the educator is allowing a half-baked answer. I feel as if
this method is beneficial in that it also establishes academic rigor since it does not let students
give shoddy answers and it encourages them to develop more educated and contemplated
responses.
The Stretch It technique also involves question answering, but goes deeper than that to
instigate academic rigor. Instead of letting a correct answer be just that, Stretch It involves
asking pertinent follow-up questions, which establishes a culture of rigor as the educator lets
students know that there are always going to be future tests of their knowledge (108). Lemov
states that Stretch It leads to building a culture around those interactions that helps students
embrace, and even welcome, the notion that learning is never done (108) Surely this technique
aids in setting a tone for academic rigor as it challenges to know more and, ideally, to know
more.
Without Apology is a technique that silently instills a culture of rigor. Instead of having
to do with answering questions, it involves refraining from apologizing for the difficulty of the
lesson or material at hand in any way. Lemov succinctly sums up the dangers of apologizing as a
teacher, stating a belief that content is boring is self-fulfilling prophecy (122). I can see how
apologizing in any way for the boringness or difficulty of content would cheapen the rigorous
There are many other techniques in this work, as well as technical facets that have to do
with those techniques, such as data collection. I have chosen to review more closely those
techniques and technical facets that stood out to me most. That is not to say, however, that those
I did not discuss are not worthwhile. There were slight parts that I disagreed with such as the
hand gestures of support described during the No Opt Out technique (67), but overall, I not
only found affirmation of what I have done as a substitute teacher and during practicum, but also
teaching philosophies as being most conducive to academic rigor. I recognize, of course, that
other philosophies can be just as rigorous. That being said, it felt as if Lemov was writing to a
more traditional educator, which is what I am aspiring to be. He states himself that he prefers
rows to desk groups (141), and the techniques I list above and throughout the book encourage
that aforementioned academic rigor, which I associate with a positive-yet-strict demeanor. One
possible criticism might be that the scenarios that Lemov writes about are all localized and might
not apply everywhere. Some of the techniques provided might not include explanation on what
collect the data and examples he uses and he admits himself that not all of these techniques
would be applicable to all teachers in all situations (19). Teaching is oftentimes a case-by-case
profession, after all. In reviewing this work, I would certainly utilize its techniques in my future
classroom.
Teach Like a Champion 2.0: Field Guide
In the Teach Like a Champion 2.0s accompanying work, Teach Like a Champion 2.0:
Field Guide, Doug Lemov et al provide a condensed, concentrated and interactive sequel to the
aforementioned title. The work reads like a general guide to using specific techniques described
in Teach Like a Champion 2.0, with more suggestions as to how to implement those techniques
and areas in the book to test and record them. It also includes several videos for visual
presentation of the execution of the techniques for better understanding. Since so much of this
piece harkens back to its accompanying work, the content of this review is likely to sound
repetitive.
Just as in Teach Like a Champion 2.0, this work stresses the development of various
cultures in ones classroom and how to utilize studied techniques to achieve them. That said,
being a field guide, it more so focuses on how to properly implement the techniques. One such
technique expanded upon is Technique 10: Own and Track, which can be considered to aid in
maintaining a culture of academic excellence in ones classroom. Regarding Own and Track,
Lemov posits that an educator ought to encourage students to find their own mistakes and to
follow through in understanding what they got wrong so they can seek to correct them in the
future. Says Lemov students must Own and Track: learn from and reflect on what they have
learned in the process of getting from incorrect to correct (Location 4483). In training students
to be able to Own and Track, educators can free up their time in the classroom as well as
concentrate on what students are grasping well and what they are struggling on. In this field
guide, Lemov also provides possible reflections on techniques that were not provided in its
associated work. A reflection for Own and Track describes how it might help educators, claiming
from a teachers point of view, not having students Own and Track whats right makes it more
difficult to verify whether they can truly apply what they learned from discussion (Location
4501). If implemented correctly, and if the educator is able to ensure a regiment through which
students can effectively check their own work Technique 10: Own and Track would increase
In order to see success in Own and Track, Lemov asserts that an educator must have
already established the aforementioned Culture of Error, described in the review of the
supplementary text. That is to say, before students will be comfortable finding and correcting
their own mistakes, they need to be comfortable admitting their mistakes. This work dives deeper
into how to instill a Culture of Error in ones classroom. Lemov breaks down how an educator
can accomplish this more succinctly in this work, claiming, four specific actions can help you
build a Culture of Error: Expect error, withhold the answer, manage the tell, praise risk-taking
(Location 3809). These are all concepts touched in the complementary text, but the field guide
provides examples for each step locations 3861 through 3896 of the e-text. Also unique to the
field guide, Lemov provides areas for discussion and collaboration with peers. In the case of
managing ones tell to encourage a Culture of Error, Lemov writes brainstorming with a
colleague if you can, add other tells you think teachers have, including your own, for correct and
incorrect answers (Location 3872). This encourages the reader towards personal introspection.
Another way in which the field guide goes into greater detail about techniques is in including
suggested language to use in the classroom. Such examples for encouraging the Culture of Error
Other helpful tools found in the field guide include prompts and hypothetical scenarios in
which issues are addressed with the techniques in question. For instance, prompts are provided
for an educator to try using the Stretch It technique described in the first part of this review
(Location 5817). In order to better explain the technique Format Matters, which involves
students properly formatting their written responses, Lemov provides various scenarios for each
school topic (Location 6311). This proved to be particularly helpful as an educator of any
concentration can see how the technique can be applied to their own classroom.
As the Teach Like a Champion 2.0: Field Guide is such a supplemental book to the
original piece, I would certainly use it in my classroom. All of the techniques I found appealing
in the initial text are better explained, with examples and how-to guides provided as well. In
addition, it might be repetitive at times, but having those techniques described twice using
different language gave me a better grasp at what Lemov is explaining. Particular techniques that
resonated with me are Stretch It, Culture of Error, and Right is Right in regards to academic rigor
and Tracking, Not Watching, Exit Ticket, and Own and Track in regards to data collection.
The Growth Mindset Coach
This third text follows the trend of the past two, describing educating as a profession that
requires finesse as a practice that is unambiguous. In their work The Growth Mindset Coach,
Annie Brock and Heather Hundley offer guidance for developing ones classroom from
traditional methods towards a more growth-oriented environment. The text is organized into
mantras and concepts for every month, or chapter. Each following chapter builds on the
procession of developing a growth mindset and how to face challenges that might appear along
the way. This review will discuss various concepts from each month and examine what goes into
In chapter 1, August, Brock and Hundley establish the premise of moving from a fixed
mindset towards a growth mindset. A fixed mindset, referred to as where people operate in
absolute stereotypes, is described as it assumes that intelligence and other qualities, abilities,
and talents are fixed traits that cannot be significantly developed (Location 203). Conversely, a
growth mindset is one that contests the purportedly fixed aspects of ones person, that
assumes that intelligence and other qualities, abilities, and talents can be developed with effort,
In regard to how to implement a growth mindset in school, Brock and Hundley describe
that teachers ought to seek to dissuade students from pigeonholing themselves as bad at a subject
and encourage and educate them towards being successful at it. A growth mindset surmounts
using such dismissive stances, and attempts to encourage that student that they can achieve
anything they set their efforts and goals to. This is not a one-sided equation, either. Brock and
Hundley assert that the most effective and most positively memorable teachers develop a growth
mindset environment in their classrooms and encourage students towards success, no matter the
preconceived barrier. They list plausible growth mindset teachers that successful people
In chapter 2, September, Brock and Hundley cite the specific research that supports
teaching the growth mindset in schools. They reference the Project for Educational Research
That Scales (PERTS) center at Stanford and its executive director David Pauneskus study of
students to the growth mindset. According to the Brock and Hundleys work, looking at the
scores of these at-risk students, the researchers found a noticeable increase in the grade point
averages of the students receiving interventions (Location 477). Given the research behind the
growth mindset as being successful, Brock and Hundley go on to provide a lesson plan outline to
introduce the growth mindset to ones students on locations 507 through 683 of the e-book.
Chapter 3 includes the science of how the brain works and Brock and Hundley describe
how to teach your students about neuroplasticity. This involves disregarding what standardized
test scores indicate regarding ones proclivity towards any particular subject and thus using it as
means to pigeonhole oneself to just being bad at it. This serves as self-imposed barriers against
ever trying to get better at that subject. Instead, as Brock and Hundley cite several neuroscience
journals, our mind is a muscle that can grow past those barriers. They cite the Journal of
Neuroscience in particular to equate the way the brain can essentially rewire itself to get past the
communication hurdle of deafness to being able to rewire ones brain to get past any
complications they might have with understanding and comprehending a certain topic.
In several ways, chapter 4 has similarities to Teach Like a Champion 2.0. It discusses the
establishment of a growth mindset zone, which sounds akin to the sort of environment Lemov
encourages educators to establish in a Culture of Error. In a growth mindset zone, students and
teachers alike respect each other and project positivity with a mutual understanding that
everyone is present to learn and fulfill their best potential in that class. The chapter proceeds to
describe the growth mindset in student-teacher relations. Similar to the mannerisms and
projected positivity described by Lemovs section regarding Cold Call, growth mindset in
teacher-student relations involves an atmosphere where students know that the teacher has faith
in their ability to achieve, among other similar criteria (Location 1232). The chapter contains
other similarities between the two texts, such as hand signals and code words, feeling secure
around the teacher, and the educator projecting positivity (Location 1316).
Later on in their work, Brock and Hundley discuss mistakes as opportunities. Similar to
Lemovs explanation of how the Culture of Error works, Brock and Hundley offer a three-step
strategy to utilize mistakes as learning experiences. They posit the steps of 1. Normalize
(Location 2416). Students must feel comfortable making mistakes, so that teachers may correct
curriculum and classroom. Say Brock and Hundley challenge is at the crux of the growth
mindset; without it, students dont get the opportunities to take risks, learn to fail, and figure out
how to pick themselves up again (Location 1563). This is similar to Lemovs concept of
This piece read as if it were written more so for elementary teachers. It felt as if it had
more examples of elementary school situations as well as the lesson plans felt directed for
elementary level learners. Some of the famous people who have/knew people with the growth
mindset pieces of the work read as fluff and some of the studies cited felt a bit stretched to fit
relevance, such as some of the neurology studies regarding mice or deafness. When the text
described philosophy is where I benefitted from it the most. Discussing scaffolding, turning
mistakes into learning opportunities, and how to conduct oneself in the classroom effectively are
all some of the topics I feel the text described particularly well. As such, I would be inclined to
use parts of this text after cutting through the arguably off topic, or fluff parts.
What is Your Teaching Style? 5 Effective Teaching Methods for Your Classroom
In Eric Gills online article What is Your Teaching Style? 5 Effective Teaching Methods
for Your Classroom, the reader learns about different teaching styles, how to best utilize them in
the classroom and how they benefit different types of students. In addition, it discusses various
concepts such as the teaching style inventory and it addresses the question of what teaching
style is best for todays students? The following is a review regarding various key ideas that are
To start, the article lists 5 styles of teaching, being Authority, Demonstrator, Facilitator,
Delegator, and Hybrid. I feel as if these styles, as they are described, are too similar to the
them provide unique takes on how one might teach. For instance, while Authority style is
described as teacher-centered and frequently entails lengthy lecture sessions (Gill) which could
involving subjects that warrant peer feedback, like debate and creative writing (Gill). The
piece goes on to list pros and cons regarding these different styles and, while personally I lean
more towards the more structured Authority style, I know that I would end up being some sort of
Hybrid style since I know that there are bits and pieces from each style that can contribute
Regarding the teaching style inventory, Gill cites Anthony F. Grasha, a professor of
psychology at the University of Cincinnati (Gill) and how he developed the aforementioned
teaching styles. Gill posits that each style brings some aspect to the classroom that is beneficial
to students. As I mentioned earlier, I can see those benefits that each style might bring in their
best forms, and this is supported as Gill states Grasha warned against boxing teachers into a
single category. Instead, he advocated that teachers play multiple roles in the classroom (Gill).
Finally, the article attempts to answer the question of what teaching style is best for
todays students (Gill). It goes on to list aspects of the modern classroom and how the teaching
styles might play a role in those aspects. Listing pros and cons of each, as well as popular
criticisms, it is easy to note that not one particular style is perfectly suitable for students today.
That said, I would argue that if one who used any of the styles maintained a versatile and growth
mindset, he or she would be effective, regardless of the negative aspects of whichever style.
I would use this piece in the future. Even though it provides significantly less techniques
and tips as the other pieces, I feel as if it has enough guidance to be helpful. What I like
especially about this piece is that it not only discusses various types of teaching, but it also
discusses pros and cons of each, but how those cons can be surmounted.
Teaching Classroom Educators to be More Effective and Creative Teachers
In his work Teaching classroom educators how to be more effective and creative
teachers, Joseph Simplicio discusses the concept and value of teacher creativity. Regarding
teacher creativity in particular, the author brings up the impacts of technology, how teachers can
be creative, and how much versatility and new techniques they must employ.
Regarding technology, the piece discusses how students now have access to various
technologies- particularly the internet- to spend time on. The piece describes As a result
teachers now find themselves competing for student time and attention (Simplicio). From my
substitute teaching experience, I can attest to this as accurate since I had to maintain student
attention and police them on their phones frequently. The piece also goes on to describe how a
teacher might utilize technology to gain and maintain student attention. This no doubt is true as
skeptical since it requires heavy monitoring to ensure students are using technology for
Versatility is also a main point in the article. Says the author it can also as reasonably
argued that much of what educators do, and how they do it, leaves ample room for modification,
teacher and retain students genuine interests, an educator must be versatile, or maintain a growth
mindset. To be versatile, an educator must not vice their minds to absolutes and I agree that
versatility not only in being creative, but also in handling situational circumstances, is valuable.
This piece can be related to Teach Like a Champion 2.0 as it discusses teachers learning
new techniques to remain creative in the eyes of students. Teach Like a Champion 2.0 provides
many techniques for teachers to try and implement, but this piece stresses that while an educator
could use new techniques to remain creative, they should do so with caution. Therefore, it is
essential that teachers not only attempt to utilize new and creative methods of instruction, but
that they do so only after they have a firm understanding and mastery of these techniques
(Simplicio).
This piece was an interesting read, but I do not think I would use it in my classroom. It
felt too concentrated on one topic to be useful as a general tool. In addition, it discusses
technology at length, which will possibly be out-of-date by the time I get to run my own
classroom.
Works Cited
Brock, A., & Hundley, H. (2016). The growth mindset coach: a teachers month-by-month
Gill, E. (2013, January 5). What is Your Teaching Style? 5 Effective Teaching Methods for Your
strategies/5-types-of-classroom-teaching-styles/
Lemov, D. (2015). Teach like a champion 2.0: 62 techniques that put students on the path to
Lemov, D., Hernandez, J., & Kim, J. (2016). Teach like a champion 2.0 field guide: a practical
resource to make the 62 techniques your own. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass, a Wiley
Brand.
EFFECTIVE AND CREATIVE TEACHERS." Education, vol. 120, no. 4, 2000, p. 675.
link.galegroup.com/apps/doc/A63815682/OVIC?u=wylrc_uwyoming&xid=abf383be.