What The Consumer Financial Protection Bureaus Ban On Class Action Waivers In Arbitration Agreements Means For Your Company
By: publication to adopt a resolution and news
Jason Anderson outlets are reporting that the Senate looks janderson@sycr.com unlikely to vote on the resolution in the (949) 725-4233 month of August.
This means that the CFPB arbitration rule is
likely to go into effect and companies need Katie Beaudin to reevaluate the agreements they have in kbeaudin@sycr.com place while also preparing for a potential (949) 725-4074 spike in consumer litigation.
The CFPB rule will become effective in eight
months, so companies within CFPB jurisdiction need to start reviewing existing consumer agreements to ensure that The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau arbitration provisions are included and (CFPB) published a new rule on July 19 drafted in accordance with the new rule. barring companies that the CFPB oversees This includes not only agreements with from inserting class action waivers in consumers, but also terms and conditions mandatory arbitration clauses that are featured on company websites. The included in their contracts with consumers. proposed rule requires the following The rule will prohibit class action waivers in language: We agree that neither we nor agreements relating to checking or savings anyone else will use this agreement to stop accounts, credit cards, student loans, you from being part of a class action case in payday loans, some payment processing court. You may file a class action in court or services, consumer reports and credit you may be a member of a class action scores, prepaid cards, and consumer debt even if you do not file it. collection, among others. The CFPB describes the rule as making it easier for Companies may also see more consumer consumers to band together when harmed class action litigation once the final rule by a financial service provider. goes into effect. The CFPB studied current arbitration data and found that over the CFPB rules are subject to override either by three-year period of 20102012, consumers Congress power under the Congressional only filed an average of 411 claims for Review Act or the Financial Stability arbitration in consumer financial services Oversight Council, a panel of regulators products. The rule will likely see a huge created by the Dodd-Frank Act. The spike in the number of suits companies Council forewent a challenge to the rule, face. leaving the fate of the CFPB arbitration rule in the hands of Congress. The U.S. House Stradlings Consumer Class Action Practice of Representatives voted to block the rule, Group is prepared to help companies better and the Senate Banking Committee also understand how this rule affects them from introduced their own version of the drafting new consumer agreements and resolution blocking the rule. However, the later defending consumer class actions. Congressional Review Act only gives both chambers 60 legislative days after a rules
Louis Mickens-Thomas v. Donald Vaughn Pennsylvania Board of Probation and Parole, The Pennsylvania Board of Pardons The Attorney General of The State of Pennsylvania, 355 F.3d 294, 3rd Cir. (2004)