See

discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/259486796

Achieving Business Benefits from ERP Systems

Chapter August 2008

DOI: 10.4018/978-1-59904-531-3.ch005

CITATIONS READS

4 9,441

1 author:

Alok Mishra
Atilim University
166 PUBLICATIONS 953 CITATIONS

SEE PROFILE

Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects:

HiCure Project View project

All content following this page was uploaded by Alok Mishra on 14 January 2014.

The user has requested enhancement of the downloaded file.

 

Chapter V
Achieving Business Benefits
from ERP Systems
Alok Mishra
Atilim University, Turkey

ABStRAct

Enterprise resource planning (ERP) systems are becoming popular in medium and large-scale organi-
zations all over the world. As companies have to collaborate across borders, languages, cultures, and
integrate business processes, ERPs will need to take globalization into account, be based on a global
architecture, and support the features required to bring all the worldwide players and processes together.
Due to the high cost of implementation for these systems, organizations all over the world are interested
in evaluating their benefits in the short and long terms. This chapter discusses various kinds of business
benefits in a comprehensive way in order to justify the acquisition and implementation of ERP systems
in organizations in the present global context.

intRoDUction tories, shortening cycle times, lowering costs, and

Enterprise resource planning (ERP) systems have
become very important in modern business opera-
tions as ERP has played a major role in changing
organizational computing for the better. One
study found that more than 60% of Fortune 500
companies had adopted an ERP system (Stewart,
Milford, Jewels, Hunter, & Hunter 2000). These
systems have been credited with reducing inven-
improving supply chain management practices.
ERP has been credited with increasing the speed
with which information flows through a company
(Davenport, 1998). ERP has also been credited
with creating value through integrating activities
across a firm, implementing best practices for each
business process, standardizing processes within
organizations, creating one-source data that results
in less confusion and error, and providing online

Copyright 2008, IGI Global, distributing in print or electronic forms without written permission of IGI Global is prohibited.

access to information (OLeary, 2000). All of these
features facilitate better organizational planning,
communication, and collaboration (Olson, 2004).
Applied Robotics increased on-time deliveries
40% after implementing ERP, and Delta Electron-
ics reduced production control labor requirements
by 65% (Weil, 1999). Therefore, in the last decade,
organizations around the world have made huge
investments in enterprise systems. According to
a report by Advanced Manufacturing Research,
the ERP software market was expected to grow
from $21 billion in 2002 to $31 billion in 2006,
and the entire enterprise applications market which
includes customer relationships management and
supply chain management software will top $70
billion (AMR Research, 2002). It was estimated
that in the 1990s about $300 billion was invested
in ERP systems worldwide and that this was ex-
pected to grow to $79 billion annually by 2004
(Carlino, Nelson, & Smith, 2000).
Enterprise systems include enterprise resource
planning, customer relationship management
(SCM), supply chain management (SCM), product
lifecycle management (PLM), and e-procure-
ment software (Shang & Seddon, 2002). ERP
software integrates management information
and processes, such as financial, manufacturing,
distribution, and human resources, for the pur-
pose of enabling enterprise-wide management of
resources (Davenport, 1998; Deloitte Consulting,
1998; Klaus, Rosemann, & Gable, 2000).
ERP helps organizations to meet the challenges
of globalization with a comprehensive, integrated
application suite that includes next-generation
analytics, human capital management, financials,
operations, and corporate services. With sup-
port for industry-specific best practices, ERP
helps organizations improve productivity, sense
and respond to market changes, and implement
new business strategies to develop and maintain
a competitive edge. ERP is designed to help
businesses succeed in the global marketplace
by supporting international legal and financial
compliance issues, and enabling organiza-

Achieving Business Benefits From ERP Systems
tions to adapt internal operations and business
processes to meet country-specific needs. As
a result, organizations can focus on improving
productivity and serving their customers instead
of struggling to ensure they are in compliance
with business and legal requirements around the
world. Companies that automate and streamline
workflows across multiple sites (including suppli-
ers, partners, and manufacturing sites) produced
66% more improvement in reducing total time
from order to delivery, according to Aberdeens
2007 study of the role of ERP in globalization.
Those companies that coordinate and collaborate
between multiple sites, operating as a vertically
integrated organization, have achieved more than
a 10% gain in global market share. The majority
of companies studied (79%) view global markets
as a growth opportunity, but of those companies,
half are also feeling pressures to reduce costs
(Jutras, 2007). Those companies that coordinate
and collaborate between multiple sites, operat-
ing as vertically integrated organizations, have
achieved more than a 10% gain in global market
share (Marketwire, 2007).
BUSineSS BeneFitS FRoM eRP
SySteMS
With the growing proliferation of ERP systems,
including midsize companies, it becomes critical
to address why and under what circumstances one
can realize the benefits of an ERP system (Gefen
& Ragowsky, 2005). ERP systems can provide the
organization with competitive advantage through
improved business performance (Hitt, Wu, &
Zhou, 2002; Kalling, 2003) by, among other things,
integrating supply chain management, receiving,
inventory management, customer orders manage-
ment, production planning and managing, ship-
ping, accounting, human resource management,
and all other activities that take place in a modern
business (Gefen & Ridings, 2002; Hong & Kim,
2002; Kalling, 2003). Thus, business benefits from
Achieving Business Benefits From ERP Systems
ERP systems use are multidimensional, ranging
from operational improvements through decision-
making enhancement to support for strategic goals
(Davenport, 2000; Deloitte Consulting, 1998;
Markus & Tanis, 2000; Ross & Vitale, 2000;
Irani & Love, 2001; Wilderman, 1999; Cooke &
Peterson, 1998; Campbell, 1998). Gartner Group
(1998) also mentions enterprise systems benefits in
these areas, including both tangible and intangible
benefits. While some companies claim to have
reduced their cycle time, improved their financial
management, and obtained information faster
through ERP systems, in general they still have
a high initial implementation failure rate (Hong
& Kim, 2002; Songini, 2004). Many prior studies
examining the relationship between investing in
IT and the performance level of the organization
(Weil, 1999) dealt with the ratio of total IT invest-
ment (i.e., software, hardware, personnel) to the
entire organizations performance (the total profit
of the organization).
Many early studies found no positive rela-
tionship between the two variables. Strassmann
(1985) examined service-sector firms but found
no significant relationship between investment in
IT and high-performing firms. Berndt and Mor-
rison (1992) even found a negative relationship
between the growth in productivity and investment
in high-tech, although, as they point out, this may
have been the result of measurement problems. As
Brynjolfsson (1993) summarizes, positive returns
from investing in IT may not have shown up in
previous research because of the inadequate way
it was measured. When measuring IT investment
on a per-user basis, there is a positive correlation
between IT investment and overall productivity
(Brynjolfsson, 2003). Although there is a large
variance among companies in the benefit they
achieve from their IT investment (Brynjolfsson,
2003), on average there is a $10 gain in company
valuation for each dollar invested in IT (Bryn-
jolfsson et al., 2002). Showing such a positive
relationship is important because it affects MIS
funding.
According to Parker and Benson (1988), in
order for enterprise to gain competitive advantage,
the way in which IT is justified financially must
change. Classical quantitative techniques (e.g.,
cost-benefit analysis) are not adequate for the
evaluation of IT applications, except when dealing
with cost-avoidance issues, which generally occur
at the operational level. If these methodologies are
to be enhanced, additional measuressuch as per-
ceived value to the business, increased customer
satisfaction, and the utility of IT in supporting
decision makingmust be considered (Katz,
1993). Investment in ERP systems payoff remains
a controversial question (Hitt et al., 2002; Sarkis &
Sundarraj, 2003; Kalling, 2003). ERP systems are
very complicated software packages that support
the entire set of organizational activities. Hence,
it is possible that there are many unknown factors
that impact the relationship between investment
in ERP and organizational productivity. This
chapter observes the managers perception of the
benefits their organization gains from using ERP
systems and what impacts this benefits.
ERP system investments are strategic in
nature, with the key goal often being to help a
company grow in sales, reduce production lead
time, and improve customer service (Steadman,
1999). In IT, evaluation costs are hard to quantify
in post-implementation audits and benefits are
harder to identify and quantify (Hochstrasser
& Griffiths, 1991; Willcocks & Lester, 1999;
Irani, Sharif, & Love, 2001; Seddon, Graeser, &
Willcocks, 2002). Management of organizations
that adopt ERP expects many benefits from the
systems. These expectations are often difficult to
meet. ERP can be seen to provide more responsive
information to management. There also is more
interaction across the organization and more ef-
ficient financial operation (Olson, 2004). There
is weaker perceived benefit from operational per-
formance, such as improved operating efficiency,
inventory management, and cash management.
While more information is available at higher
quality, this does not directly translate to cost
efficiencies across the board.


SAP-ERP delivers business benefits where
they matter mostto the bottom lineand
addresses the internal and external business re-
quirements of global enterprise. Organizations
can invest in mySAP ERP with confidence that
expansion or change in any country or division
will be supported. The solution provides global
businesses with concrete benefits that enable
success, including the following (My SAP ERP,
2007):
Improved productivity for greater efficiency
and responsiveness
Increased insight for more assured decision
making
Advanced flexibility and adaptability to cut
costs and speed change
A partner for long-term growth
In addition, businesses can reduce the costs
associated with compliance and administration,
in part by creating flexible processes that balance
global demands with local needs and that can be
adapted quickly as regulations change. Compre-
hensive financial and reporting features ensure
that globally consolidated financial reports can be
generated quickly. Support for internal controls
Table 1. Expected benefits of ERP systems (Mabert et al., 2000; Olhager & Selldin, 2003)
ERP Performance Outcomes
Quicker information response time
Increased interaction across the enterprise
Improved order management/order cycle
Decreased financial close cycle
Improved interaction with customers
Improved on-time delivery
Improved interaction with suppliers
Lowered inventory levels
Improved cash management
Reduced direct operating costs
0
Achieving Business Benefits From ERP Systems
improves financial management and reduces the
risk of noncompliance. In conjunction with the
Collaboration Folders (cFolders) application,
employees can work in seamless virtual project
teams with other departments, partners, and
suppliers around the world. Analytical capabili-
ties help organizations improve strategic insight
and performance through better identification
of global market opportunities and drivers (My
SAP ERP, 2007).
Benefits perceived from adopting an ERP
system were studied by Mabert, Soni, and Ven-
kataraman (2000) in Midwestern U.S. manufac-
turing, and replicated in Sweden by Olhager and
Selldin (2003). Both studies used a 1 to 5 scale,
with 1 representing not at all and 5 representing
to a great extent. Average ratings are given in
Tables 1 and 2.
Here, the results are very similar. ERP systems
were credited with making information more
available, at higher quality, and with integrating
operations (Olson, 2004). There was neutral sup-
port for crediting ERP with providing benefits
in specific materials management and financial
functions. The ratings of support for customer
response and personnel management were quite
low (although the Swedish rating for customer
United States Sweden
3.51 3.81
3.49 3.55
3.25 3.37
3.17 3.36
2.92 2.87
2.83 2.82
2.81 2.78
2.70 2.60
2.64 2.54
2.32 2.74
Achieving Business Benefits From ERP Systems

Table 2. Areas benefiting from ERP systems

Area United States Sweden

Availability of information 3.77 3.74

Integration of business operations/process 3.61 3.42

Quality of information 3.37 3.31

Inventory management 3.18 2.99

Financial management 3.11 2.98

Supplier management/procurement 2.99 2.94

Customer responsiveness/flexibility 2.67 2.95

Decreased information technology costs 2.06 2.05

Personnel management 1.94 2.06

response was very close to neutral). Interestingly,
both surveys found low support for crediting ERP
systems with decreasing information technology
costs. With an ERP, an organization can better
negotiate with suppliers and reduce the cost of
raw materials by as much as 15% (Schlack, 1992).
Hence, the higher the cost of raw material, the
higher the value of raw material cost reduction
out of the cost of the product.
eRP BeneFitS FRAMeWoRk
Shang and Seddon (2000) provided a comprehen-
sive framework of the benefits of ERP systems.
In their survey of 233 vendor success stories and
34 follow-up phone interviews from three major
ERP vendor Web sites, they found that all orga-
nizations derived benefit from at least two of the
five categories, and all the vendors products had
returned customer benefit in all five categories.
In the beginning of 1997 during the re-en-
gineering process, most of the multinational
organizations perceived the following benefits
of implementing ERP system:
Common processes across the globe
Centralized operations
Multi-language and currency capabilities
Better tracking of inventory
Improved utilization of raw materials
Tighter integration of production with sales
and distribution
Tax advantages through improved asset
management
Removal of a number of existing legacy
systems
Improved development and support environ-
ment
Real-time functional system enhancement
capability
In Table 3, the first three categories are based
on Anthonys (1965) much cited work on planning
and control systems. Many IS benefit analyses
and frameworks have been organized around
Anthonys trinity of operational, managerial and
strategic levels of management. One example is
Shang and Seddon (2000):
Weil (1990) evaluated the payoff from three
types of IS investmentin transactional,
informational, and strategic systemsin
the U.S. valve industry. He found that the
greatest benefits came from investment in
transactional level IT.


 Achieving Business Benefits From ERP Systems

Table 3. ERP benefits framework and extent of tangibility and quantifiability (adapted from Shang &
Seddon, 2000)

Dimension/Sub-Dimensions Tangible Quantifiable

1. Operational
1.1 Cost reduction Full Full
1.2 Cycle time deduction Most Full
1.3 Productivity improvement Most Full
1.4 Quality improvement Some Most
1.5 Customer services improvement Some Most
2. Managerial
2.1 Better resource management Some Most
2.2 Improved decision making and planning Some Some
2.3 Performance improvement Most Most
3. Strategic
3.1 Support business growth Some Full
3.2 Support business alliance Low Most
3.3 Build business innovations Some Some
3.4 Build cost leadership Some Some
3.5 Generate product differentiation Some Low
3.6 Build external linkages Low Some
4. IT infrastructure
4.1 Build business flexibility for current and future changes Low Low
4.2 IT costs reduction Full Full
4.3 Increased IT infrastructure capability Some Some
5. Organizational
5.1 Support organizational changes Low Low
5.2 Facilitate business learning Low Low
5.3 Empowerment Low Low
5.4 Build common visions Low Low

Gorry and Scott Morton (1971) and oth-
ers (Silver, 1990; Demmel & Askin, 1992)
reported significant benefits from using IT
for managerial decision suport.
Porter and Miller (1985) and others (Mc-
Farlan, 1984; Rackoff, Wiseman, & Ullrich,
1985; Clemons, 1991; Venkataraman, Hen-
derson, & Oldach 1993) noted significant
benefits from the use of IT in pursuing
strategic goals.
Mirani and Lederer (1998) adapted Antho-
nys framework to build an instrument for
assessing the organizational benefits of IS
projects.
Hicks (1997), Reynolds (1992), and Schul-
theis and Sumner (1989) also used Anthonys
categories in classifying IT benefits as opera-
tional, tactical, and strategic. The categories
were also used as frameworks for analyzing
the benefits of general and enterprise-wide


Achieving Business Benefits From ERP Systems
information systems (Wysocki & DeMichi-
ell, 1997; Irani & Love, 2001).
Willcocks (1994) and Graeser, Willcocks,
and Pisanias (1998) adapted Kaplan and Nor-
tons (1996) balanced scorecard approach in
assessing IS investment in financial, project,
process, customer, learning, and technical
aspects, and measured organizational per-
formance along Anthonys three levels of
business practice.
Therefore, there are very strong precedents
in the IS literature for attempting to classify the
benefits of enterprise systems in terms of organi-
zational performance along Anthonys three levels
of business practice.(Shang & Seddon, 2000).
intAnGiBLe BeneFitS in it AnD
eRP PRoJectS
Webster (1994) defines a tangible item as some-
thing that is capable of being appraised at an
actual or approximate value. But the value management and accounting processes including
is monetary worth, or some other measure like
customer satisfaction is not certain. According to
Hares and Royle (1994), an intangible is anything
that is difficult to measure, and the boundary
between tangible and intangible is fuzzy at best.
Determining the intangible benefits derived from
information systems implementation has been
an elusive goal of academics and practitioners
alike (Davern & Kauffman, 2000). Remenyi and
Sherwood-Smith (1999) pointed out that there are
seven key ways in which information systems
may deliver direct benefits to organizations. They
also indicated that information systems deliver
intangible benefits that are not easily assessed.
Nandish and Irani (1999) discussed the difficulty
of evaluating IT projects in the dynamic environ-
ment, especially when intangibles are involved in
the evaluation. Tallon, Kraemer, and Gurbaxni
(2000) cited a number of studies indicating that
economic and financial measures fail to assess
accurately the payoff of IT projects and suggested
that one means of determining value is through
the perception of executives. They focused on the
strategic fit and the contributions of IT projects,
but indicated that researchers need somehow to
capture or represent better the intangible benefits
of IT. In the technology arena, as in the busi-
ness areas, many projects deliver benefits that
cannot be easily quantified (Murphy & Simon,
2002). Many benefits related to the information
technology projects cannot be easily quantified,
for example better information access, improved
workflow, interdepartmental coordination, and
increased customer satisfaction (Emigh, 1999).
These are also the features that are listed as key
attributes of ERP systems (Mullin, 1999; Dav-
enport, 2000). ERP systems are implemented to
integrate transactions along and between business
processes. Common business processes include
order fulfillment, materials management, produc-
tion planning and execution, procurement, and
human resources (Murphy & Simon, 2002). ERP
systems enable efficient and error-free workflow
in-depth auditing. These systems feature a single
database to eliminate redundancy and multiple
entry errors, and they provide in-depth reporting
functionality. ERP systems provide information
for effective decision making on all organizational
levels (Murphy & Simon, 2002). According to
Hares and Royle (1994), there are four main
intangible benefits in IT investment:
1. Internal improvement: This includes pro-
cesses, workflow, and information access.
2. Customer service: This ensures quality,
delivery, and support.
3. Foresight: This is vision regarding markets,
products, and acquisitions in the future.
4. Adaptability: This is the ability to adapt
change in rapidly changing industry.
The third and fourth sets of intangibles are
future oriented and include spotting market trends
and the ability to adapt to change.


Hares and Royle (1994) stated that the first set
of ongoing intangible benefits are those concerned
with internal improvement of company operations
or performance. These include changes in produc-
tion processes, methods of operations manage-
ment, and changes to production value and process
chains with resulting benefits in increased output
or lower production costs. The second group of
ongoing benefits, customer-oriented intangibles, is
more difficult to measure because their effective-
ness is determined by external forces. The benefits
of improving customer service are greater reten-
tion of customers and customer satisfaction. The
third group of intangibles embodies the spotting
of new market trends. If new trends can be antici-
pated, then technology may be able to transform
or create products, processes, or services to gain
new sales and market position. The final group of
intangible benefits is the ability to adapt to change.
As with the identification of market trends, the
benefits derived include adapting products and
services to market trends and the modification of
production processesa critical ability for firms
in rapidly changing industries.
ERP system investments are strategic in
nature, with the key goal often being to help a
company grow in sales, reduce production lead
time, and improve customer service (Steadman,
1999). Organizations turned up an average value
of -$1.5 million when quantifiable cost savings
and revenue gains were calculated against system
implementation and maintenance costs. Improved
customer service and related intangible benefits
such as updated and streamlined technical infra-
structure are important intangible benefits that
organizations are often seeking when making
these investments. The development and imple-
mentation of ERP systems is longer in duration
and cost intensive. It is difficult to quantify in
monetary terms because of the intangible nature
of many of the derived benefits, for example,
improved customer service (Murphy & Simon,
2002).

Achieving Business Benefits From ERP Systems
The literature suggests that intangibles can be
converted into monetary terms through the ability
to take care of the following observations:
1. Maintain and increase sales
2. Increase prices
3. Reduce costs
4. Create new business
Hares and Royle (1994) give a procedure to
quantify intangible benefits. The major steps
are:
1. Identify benefits to be quantified
2. Make intangible benefits measurable
3. Predict the benefits in physical terms
4. Evaluate cash flow terms
enteRPRiSe SySteM BeneFit
FRAMeWoRk
According to Shang and Seddon (2002), the fol-
lowing five-dimensional framework, which is
built on a large body of previous research into IT
benefits, has been organized around operational
efficiency and managerial and strategic effective-
ness, as the outlook of strategic managers are too
broad to identify casual links between enterprise
system investment and benefit realization, and
those of operational managers are too narrow to
consider all relevant organizational goals. The
most appropriate management level is business
managers (middle-level management control), as
they have a comprehensive understanding of both
the capabilities of ES and the business plans for
system use. It is not expected that all organizations
will achieve benefits in all 25 sub-dimensions, or
even in all five main dimensions, but it provides
an excellent checklist of benefits that have been
accomplished in organizations using enterprise
systems.
Achieving Business Benefits From ERP Systems
1. Operational Benefits:
1.1 Cost reduction:
Labor cost reduction in customer
service, finance, human resources,
purchasing, IT services, and train-
ing.
Inventory cost in inventory turns,
dislocation costs, and warehousing
costs.
Administrative expenses reduction in
printing and other business supplies.
1.2 Cycle time reduction:
Customer support activities in order
fulfillment, billing, delivery, and
customer enquiries.
Employee support activities in month-
end closing, requisition, HR and pay-
roll, and learning.
Supplier support activities in order
processing, information exchange, and
payment.
1.3 Productivity improvement:
Production per employee, production
by labor hours, production by labor
costs, increased work volume with
same workforce, and reduced over-
time.
1.4 Quality improvement:
Error rate, data reliability to data ac-
curacy.
1.5 Customer service improvement:
Ease of data access and inquiries.
2. Managerial Benefits
2.1 Better resource management:
Better asset management for improved
cost, depreciation, relocation, custody,
physical inventory, and maintenance
records control, both locally and
worldwide.
Better inventory management in shift-
ing products where they were needed
and responding quickly to surges or
dips in demand. Managers are able
to see the inventory of all locations
in their region or across boundaries,
making possible a leaner inventory.
Better production management for
coordinating supply and demand, and
meeting production schedules at the
lowest cost.
Better workforce management for
improved workforce allocation and
better utilization of skills.
2.2 Improved decision making and planning:
Improved strategic decisions for
greater market responsiveness, fast
profit analysis, tighter cost control,
and effective strategic planning.
Improved management decisions for
flexible resource management, ef-
ficient processes, and quick response
to operational changes.
Improved customer decisions with
f lexible customer services, rapid
response to customer demands, and
prompt service adjustments.
2.3 Performance improvement in a variety of ways
in all levels of the organization:
Financial performance by lines of
business, by product, by customers, by
geographies, or by different combina-
tions.
Manufacturing performance moni-
toring, prediction, and quick adjust-
ments.
Overall operational efficiency and
effectiveness management.
3. Strategic Benefits
Strategic benefits are in a wide spectrum of
activities in internal and external areas in terms


of general competitiveness, product strategies,
strategic capabilities, and competitive position
of the organization.
3.1 Support business growth:
In transaction volume, processing
capacity and capability.
With new business units.
In products or services, new divi-
sions, or new functions in different
regions.
With increased employees, new poli-
cies and procedures.
In new markets.
With industrys rapid changes in com-
petition, regulation, and markets.
3.2 Support business alliance by:
Efficiently and effectively consolidat-
ing newly acquired companies into
standard business practice.
Building consistent IT architecture
support in different business units.
Changing selling models of new
products developed by a merged com-
pany.
Transiting new business units to a
corporate system.
Integrating resources with acquired
companies.
3.3 Building business innovation by:
Enabling new market strategy.
Building new process chains.
Creating new products or services.
3.4 Building cost leadership by:
Building a lean structure with stream-
lined processes.
Reaching business economies of scale
in operation.
Shared services.
3.5 Generating product differentiation by:
Providing customized product or

Achieving Business Benefits From ERP Systems
services, such as early preparation
for the new EMU currency policy,
customized billing, individualized
project services to different customer
requirements, and different levels of
service appropriate for various sizes
of customer organizations.
Providing lean production with make-
to-order capabilities.
3.6 Enabling worldwide expansion:
Centralized world operation.
Global resource management.
Multicurrency capability.
Global market penetration.
Cost-effective worldwide solution
deployment.
3.7 Enabling e-commerce by attracting new
customers or getting closer to customers through
the Web integration capability. The Web-enabled
ES provides benefits in business to business and
business to individual in:
Interactive customer service.
Improved product design through
customer direct feedback.
Expanding to new markets.
Building virtual corporations with vir-
tual supply and demand consortia.
Delivering customized service.
Providing real-time and reliable data
enquiries.
3.8 Generating or sustaining competitiveness:
Maintaining competitive efficiency.
Building competitive advantage with
quick decision making.
Staying ahead of competitors for better
internal business support.
Using opportunities generated by en-
terprise systems to pull abreast of world
leaders by using the same software and
being compatible with customers.
Achieving Business Benefits From ERP Systems
4. IT Infrastructure Benefits
4.1 Building business flexibility by rapid response
to internal and external changes at lower cost
and providing a range of options in reacting to
changing requirements.
4.2 IT cost reduction in:
Total cost of maintaining and integrat-
ing legacy systems by eliminating
separate data centers and applications,
as well as their supporting costs.
IT staff reductions.
Mainframe or hardware replace-
ment.
System architecture design and devel-
opment.
System upgrade maintenance.
System modification and future
changes.
Technology research and develop-
ment.
4.3 Increase IT infrastructure capability:
Stable and flexible support for the current and fu-
ture business changes in process and structure.
Stability:
Reliable platforms.
Global platforms with global knowl-
edge pipeline.
Transformed IS management and
increased IS resource capability.
Continuous improvement in process
and technology.
Flexibility:
Modern technology adaptability.
Extendibility to external parties.
Expandability to a range of applica-
tions.
Customizable and configurable.
5. Organizational Benefits
Organizational benefits can be evaluated in indi-
vidual attitudes, employee morale and motivation,
and interpersonal interactions.
5.1 Changing work pattern with shifted focus:
Coordination between different inter-
disciplinary matters.
Harmonization of interdepartmental
processes.
5.2 Facilitating business learning and broaden
employee skills:
Learned by entire workforce.
Shortened learning time.
Broadened employee skills.
Employees with motivation to learn
the process.
5.3 Empowerment:
Accountability, more value-added
responsibility.
More proactive users in problem
solving, transformed from doers to
planners.
Working autonomously.
Users with ownership of the system.
Greater employee involvement in busi-
ness management.
5.4 Building common visions:
Acting as one and working as a com-
mon unit.
Consistent vision across different
levels of organizations.
5.5 Shifting work focus:
Concentrate on core work.
Focus on customer and market.
Focus on business process.
Focus on overall performance.


5.6 Increased employee morale and satisfaction:
Satisfied users with better decision-mak-
ing tools.
Satisfied users with increased work
efficiency.
Satisfied users in solving problems
efficiently.
Satisfied users in increased system
skills and business knowledge.
Increased morale with better business
performance.
Satisfied employees for better em-
ployee service.
DiScUSSion
The above benefits were reported by all selected
cases as mentioned by Shang and Seddon (2002);
also, examples of each benefit dimension were
found in cases from each ES vendor. Every busi-
ness achieved benefits in at least two dimensions.
Operational and infrastructure benefits were the
most quoted benefits: 170 cases (73% of 233)
claimed to have achieved operational benefits,
and 194 cases (83%) claimed IT infrastructure
benefits (Shang & Seddon, 2002). Operational
benefits such as cost, speed, and error rates are
measurable in many cases. Managerial benefits,
although less tangible, are linked directly with
information used at different decision-making
levels and with different resources. The most
useful information on both these dimensions
was provided by business managers or process
owners, who had a clearer picture of the impact
of the adoption of ES on the overall organization,
including their own and their colleagues decision
making. Strategic benefits appear to flow from a
broad range of activities in internal and external
areas, and are described in terms of general
competitiveness, product strategies, and other
strategic capabilities. Organizational benefits
are mainly reflected in individual attitudes (e.g.,
employee morale) and interpersonal interactions.

Achieving Business Benefits From ERP Systems
Operational benefits may come with increased
managerial effectiveness, strategic benefits rely
on operational efficiency, and organizational ben-
efits can be realized in parallel with managerial
benefits (Shang & Seddon, 2002).
Regardless of tangible or intangible benefits,
it is progressively more difficult to measure
managerial, organizational, and strategic benefits
than infrastructure or operational benefits; this
has been an issue of debate since information
systems advanced beyond transaction processing
systems (Murphy & Simon, 2002). With ERP
systems, success has been determined based
on the organizations acceptance of the changes
that the system introduces. Further, Murphy and
Simon (2002) observed that organizational and
managerial classification benefits are not only the
most difficult to obtain, but also are the hardest
to quantify.
FUtURe ReSeARch DiRectionS
Empirical studies of ERP benefits assessments
in different organizations and their comparisons
might be an interesting area for further work in
this direction. Furthermore, assessment of ERP
benefits can be performed at two levels: first at an
enterprise level, where the entire ERP system can
be assessed regarding different types of benefits
derived from the ERP; and second at a specific
module (application) level, which offers interesting
areas for future research. Future research efforts
should focus on managerial, organizational, and
strategic benefits, which are still unexplored
in terms of intangible benefits measurement to
quantify.
concLUSion
Assessing whether investment in enterprise sys-
tems pays off is an important issue. Organizations
can achieve a number of tangible and intangible
Achieving Business Benefits From ERP Systems
benefits due to successful implementation of ERP
systems. These benefits can be derived globally,
and in the context of globalization it is important
to understand an organizations managerial people
and shareholders as well. ERP helps organiza-
tions meet the challenges of globalization with
a comprehensive, integrated application suite
that includes next-generation analytics, human
capital management, financials, operations, and
corporate services. ERP is designed to help
businesses succeed in the global marketplace
by supporting international legal and financial
compliance issues, and enabling organizations to
adapt internal operations and business processes
to meet country-specific needs. This will be help-
ful for decision makers (managerial people) of
organizations to evaluate various available ERPs
in acquisition and implementation. This will also
a further aid managers in assessing the benefits of
their existing ERPs in the organization in a more
objective way all over the world .
ReFeRenceS
AMR Research. (2002). AMR Research pre-
dicts enterprise applications market will reach
$70 billion in 2006. Retrieved from http:www.
amrresearch.com
Anthony, R.N. (1965). Planning and control
systems: A framework for analysis. Graduate
School of Business Administration, Harvard
University, USA.
Berndt, E.R., & Morrison, C.J. (1992). High-tech
capital formation and economic performance in
U.S. manufacturing: An exploratory analysis.
Economics, Finance and Accounting Working
Paper #3419, Sloan School of Management, Mas-
sachusetts Institute of Technology, USA.
Brynjolfsson, E. (1993). The productivity paradox
of information technology. Communications of
the ACM, 36(12), 67-77.
Campbell, S. (1998). Mining for profit in ERP soft-
ware. Computer Reseller News, (October), 19.
Carlino, J., Nelson, S., & Smith, N. (2000). AMR
Research predicts enterprise applications market
will reach $78 billion by 2004. Retrieved from
http://www.amrresearch.com/press/files/99518.
asp
Cooke, D.P., & Peterson, W.J. (1998, July). SAP
implementation: Strategies and results. R-1217-
98-RR, The Conference Board, New York,
USA.
Clemons, E.K. (1991). Evaluation of strategic
investments in information technology. Com-
munications of the ACM, 34, 22-36.
Davenport, T.H. (1998). Putting the enterprise into
the enterprise system. Harvard Business Review,
(July/August), 121-131.
D a v e n p o r t , T. H . ( 2 0 0 0 ) . M i s s i o n
criticalRealizing the promise of enterprise
systems. Boston: Harvard Business School.
Davern, M.J., & Kauffman, R.J. (2000). Discover-
ing potential and realizing value from information
technology investments. Journal of Information
Management Information Systems, 16, 121-143.
Deloitte Consulting. (1998). ERPs second
waveMaximizing the value of ERP-enabled
processes. New York.
Demmel, J., & Askin, R. (1992). A multiple-objec-
tive decision model for the evaluation of advanced
manufacturing systems technology. Journal of
Manufacturing Systems, 11, 179-194.
Emigh, J. (1999). Net present value. Computer-
world, 33, 52-53.
Gartner Group. (1998). 1998 ERP and FMIS
studyExecutive summary. Stamford, CT.
Gefen, D., & Ragowsky, A. (2005). A multi-level
approach to measuring the benefits of an ERP

 Achieving Business Benefits From ERP Systems

system in manufacturing firms. Information Jutras, C. (2007). The role of ERP in globalization.
System Management, (Winter), 18-25. Retrieved from http://www.aberdeen.com/sum-
mary/report/benchmark/RA_ERPRoleinGlobal-
Gefen, D., & Ridings, C. (2002). Implementa-
ization_CJ_3906.asp
tion team responsiveness and user evaluation
of CRM: A quasi-experimental design study of Kalling, T. (2003). ERP systems and the strategic
social exchange theory. Journal of Management management processes that lead to competitive
Information Systems, 19(1), 47-63. advantage. Information Resources Management
Journal, 16(4), 46-67.
Gorry, A., & Scott Morton, M.S. (1971). A frame-
work for management information systems. Sloan Kaplan, R., & Norton, D.P. (1996). Using the bal-
Management Review, 13, 49-61. ance scorecard as a strategic management system.
Harvard Business Review, (January/February),
Graeser, V., Willcocks, L., & Pisanias, N. (1996).
75-85.
Developing the IT scorecard. London: Business
Intelligence. Katz, A.I. (1993). Measuring technologys busi-
ness value: Organizations seek to prove IT benefits.
Hicks, J.O. (1997). Management information
Information Systems Management, 10, 33-39.
systems: A user perspective. Minneapolis/St.
Paul: West. Klaus, H., Rosemann, M., & Gable, G.G. (2000).
What is ERP? Information System Frontiers, 2,
Hitt, L.M., Wu, D.J., & Zhou, X. (2002). ERP
141-162.
investment: Business impact and productivity
measures. Journal of Management Information Mabert, V.M., Soni, A., & Venkataraman, N.
Systems, 19(1), 71-98. (2000). Enterprise resource planning survey of
U.S. manufacturing firms. Production and Inven-
Hares, J., & Royle, D. (1994). Measuring the value
tory Management Journal, 41(2), 52-58.
of information technology, 7, 109-122.
Marketwire. (2007). Thinking global? Dont
Hochstrasser, B., & Griffiths, C. (1991). Control-
lose sight of profitable growth. Retrieved from
ling IT investment: Strategy and management.
http://www.marketwire.com/mw/release_html_
London: Chapman & Hall.
b1?release_id=224493
Hong, K., & Kim, Y. (2002). The critical success
Markus, L.M., & Tanis, C. (2000). The enterprise
factors for ERP implementation: An organiza-
systems experienceFrom adoption to success.
tional fit perspective. Information & Management,
In R.W. Zmud (Ed.), Framing the domains of
40(1), 25-40.
IT research: Glimpsing the future through the
Irani, Z., & Love, P.E.D. (2001). The propaga- past. Cincinnati, OH: Pinnaflex Educational
tion of technology management taxonomies for Resources.
evaluating investments in information systems.
McFarlan, F.W. (1984). Information technology
Journal of Management Information Systems,
changes the way you compete. Harvard Business
17, 161-178.
Review, (May/June), 98-103.
Irani, Z., Sharif, A.M., & Love, P.E.D. (2001).
Mirani, R., & Lederer, A.L. (1998). An instru-
Transforming failure into success through organi-
ment for assessing the organizational benefits of
sational learning: An analysis of a manufactur-
IS project. Decision Sciences, 29, 803-838.
ing information system. European Journal of
Information Systems, 10, 55-66.

0
Achieving Business Benefits From ERP Systems
MIT. (n.d.). Economic performance in U.S. manu-
facturing: An exploratory analysis. Economics,
Finance and Accounting Working Paper #3419,
Sloan School of Management, Massachusetts
Institute of Technology, USA.
Mullin, R. (1999). ERP users say payback is pass.
Chemical Week, 161, 25-26.
Murphy, K.E., & Simon, S.J. (2002). Intangible
benefits valuation in ERP projects. Information
Systems Journal, 12, 301-320.
MySAP ERP. (2007). Globalization with localiza-
tion. Retrieved from www.sap.com/usa/solutions/
grc/pdf/BWP_mySAP_ERP_Global_Local.pdf
Nandish, V.P., & Irani, Z. (1999). Evaluating in-
formation technology in dynamic environments:
A focus on tailorable information. Logistics
Information Management, 12, 32.
OLeary, D.E. (2000). Enterprise resource plan-
ning systems: Systems, life cycle, electronic
commerce, and risk. Cambridge: Cambridge
University Press.
Olhager, J., & Selldin, E. (2003). Enterprise
resource planning survey of Swedish manufac-
turing firms. European Journal of Operational
Research, 146, 365-373.
Olson, D.L. (2004). Managerial issues of enter-
prise resource planning systems. McGraw-Hill
International.
Parker, M., & Benson, R. (1988). Information
economics: Linking business performance to
information technology. London: Prentice Hall.
Porter, M.E., & Miller, V.E. (1985). How informa-
tion gives you competitive advantage. Harvard
Business Review, 63, 149-160.
Rackoff, N., Wiseman, C., & Ullrich, W.A. (1985).
Information systems for competitive advantage:
Implementation of a planning process. MIS Quar-
terly, 9, 285-294.
Remenyi, D., & Sherwood-Smith, M. (1999).
Maximize information systems value by continu-
ous participative evaluation. Logistics Information
Management, 12, 14-25.
Reynolds, G.W. (1992). Information systems for
managers. Minneapolis/St. Paul, MN: West.
Ross, J.W., & Vitale, M. (2000). The ERP revo-
lution. Surviving versus thriving. Information
System Frontiers, 2(2), 233-241.
Sarkis, J., & Sundarraj, R.P. (2003). Managing
large scale global enterprise resource planning
systems: A case study at Texas Instruments. In-
ternational Journal of Information Management,
23(5), 431-442.
Schultheis, R., & Sumner, M. (1989). Manage-
ment information systems: The managers view.
Boston: Irwin.
Seddon, P.B., Graeser, V., & Willcocks, L. (2002).
Measuring organizational IS effectiveness: An
overview and update of senior management
perspectives. The Database for Advances in
Information Systems, 33, 11-28.
Schlack, M. (1992). IS has a new job in manufac-
turing. Datamation, (January 15), 38-40.
Stewart, G., Milford, M., Jewels, T., Hunter, T.,
& Hunter, B. (2000). Organizational readiness
for ERP implementation. In Proceedings of the
Americas Conference on Information Systems
(pp. 966-971).
Shang, S., & Seddon, P.B. (2002). Assessing and
managing the benefits of enterprise systems: The
business managers perspective. Information
Systems Journal, 12, 271-299.
Shang, S., & Seddon, S. (2000). A comprehensive
framework for classifying the benefits of ERP
systems. Proceedings of Americas Conference
on Information Systems.

 Achieving Business Benefits From ERP Systems

Silver, M. (1990). Decision support systems: Direct Wysocki, R., & DeMichiell, R.L. (1997). Manag-
and non-directed changes. Information Systems ing information across the enterprise. New York:
Research, 1, 47-88. John Wiley & Sons.
Songini, M.C. (2004, August 23). Ford abandons Wilderman, B. (1999). Enterprise resource man-
Oracle procurement systems, switches back to agement solutions and their value. Stanford, CT:
mainframe apps. Retrieved from http://www. MetaGroup.
computerworld.com/softwaretopics/erp/sto-
ry/0.10801,95404,00.html
Steadman, C. (1999). Calculating ROI. Comput- ADDitionAL ReADinG
erworld, 33, 6.
Bingi, P., Sharma, M.K., & Godla, J.K. (1999).
Strassmann, P. (1985). Information payoff: The
Critical issues affecting an ERP implementation.
transformation of work in the electronic age.
Information Systems Management, (Summer),
London: Collier Macmillan.
121-131.
Tallon, P., Kraemer, K., & Gurbaxni, V. (2000).
Litecky, C.R. (1981). Intangibles in cost/benefit
Executives perception of business value of infor-
analysis. Journal of Systems Management, 32,
mation technology: A process-oriented approach.
15-17.
Journal of Management Information Systems,
16(4), 145-173. Motwani, J., Mirchandani, D., Madan, M., &
Gunasekaran, A. (2002). Successful implemen-
Venkataraman, N., Henderson, J., & Oldach, S.H.
tation of ERP projects: Evidence from two case
(1993). Continuous strategic alignment: Exploiting
studies. International Journal of Production
IT capabilities for competitive success. European
Economics, 75.
Management Journal, 11, 139-149.
Olson, D.L. (2004). Managerial issues of enter-
Weil, M. (1999). Managing to win. Manufacturing
prise resource planning systems (international
Systems, 17(November), 14.
ed.). Singapore: McGraw-Hill.
Willcocks, L.P., & Lester, S. (Eds.). (1999). Be-
Simms, J. (1997). Evaluating IT: Where cost-
yond the IT productivity paradox. Chichester:
benefit can fail. Australian Accountant, (May),
John Wiley & Sons.
29-31.
Willcocks, L. (Ed.). (1994). Information manage-
van Everdingen, Y., van Hellegersberg, J., &
ment: Evaluation of information systems invest-
Waarts, E. (2000). ERP adoption by European
ments. London: Chapman & Hall.
midsize companies. Communications of the ACM,
43(4), 27-31.



View publication stats