Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
1. What is the lecture/talk all about? Give brief detail of his lecture.
2. What is most interesting topic(s) for you? How this became the most logical/essential
topic(s) for you?
The most interesting part of the lecture is the researchers that should not do or
specifically the author responsibilities. As a researcher, our work should be new and is
original, that papers result should be true, complete and are significant findings. That it
should not include any type of plagiarism and other falsification research practices. And
lastly that proper permission or citation should be observed on research papers.
Researchers should be aware of these as papers can be examined by even more
anonymous reviewers and if ever to be published this cannot be replicated by other
researches if the results are a product of fabrication. Likewise, data manipulation might
also mislead their co-researchers and might impede other researchers progress in
conducting a more reliable research. These violations are most likely the reasons why
some researchers become trust worthless enough nowadays.
3. What is the importance of the lecture for your entire MS study program and as student
attending to fishery resource management class?
This broadens my knowledge to perform ethical responsibilities as an integral
obligation of a researcher to become accountable and trustworthy and to extend
knowledge from what is done. From the concept of fisheries, we have a wide range of
scope in which we might be dealing with samples from human, plants to animal and even
non-living things, but with research ethics, we became aware of the consequences from
the violations of ethical standards to produce a meaningful and reliable research
endeavor. A promising, worthwhile and full of confidence research paper is a success
once research ethics is given an attention. And this is what a student attending to fishery
resource management class should be realized.