IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRIGNIA

ALEXANDRIA DIVISION

JANICE WOLK GRENADIER Case No. 1:17 cv 00280

Plaintiff

v.

JUDGE JAMES C. CLARK

Defendant

MOTION FO R NEW SUBPEONAS TO BE SIGNED IMMEDIATELY TO BE SERVED

RECONSIDERATION FOR SUBPEONAS DENIED FOR DISCOVERY TO BE
RECOSIDERED BY JUDGE HILTON
THE SUPBEONAS ARE FOR WITNESS EXAMINATION IN A COURT HEARING FILED AND
ON THE DOCKET FOR JUNE 2, 2017

COMES NOW the court should take notice the defendants counsel and the Plaintiff Janice Wolk
Grenadier have agreed to switch the hearing from March 26, 2017 to June 2, 2017. Plaintiff demands
this court to give due process to a Pro Se Litigant that has been denied subpoenaed witnesss at any
and all hearings. We are here today due to the Scheme the State of Virginia who supported Judge
James Clark in his Cover Up of the criminal spree of Divorce Lawyer Ilona Grenadier Heckman.

That Janice Wolk Grenadier when she filed this case it was given to Judge Ellis. Janice then learned
that Judge Anderson and Divorce Lawyer Ilona Grenadier Heckman were possible involved in a
physical and personal relationship. Two days later Janice Wolk Grenadier gets a Google alert that
Judge Anderson has removed the case from Judge Ellis and moved it to himself and Judge Hilton. This
evidence will be submitted into the court on the hearing on May 12, 2017. Judge Anderson by his
Order on May 3, 2017 refusing to recuse has stated clearly that he has no direct or indirect physical
and or personal relationship with Divorce Lawyer Ilona Grenadier Heckman by stating the charges are
unfounded.

That the appearance is that on June 2, 2017 Plaintiff in front of Judge Hilton has to argue why this case
should not be dismissed. That is of course unless the Scheme and the Obstruction of Justice was
planed that this would all be decided in Judges Chambers to deny an open court hearing to Janice
Wolk Grenadier along with witnesss that could expose the truth.
1
That Rule 45 clearly states the right to subpoena witnesses for lawyers yet Pro Se Litigants are
expected to ask permission of a Judge this is in direct conflict with my Constitutional Rights under the
5th and 14th Amendments to Due Process. Further my Constitutional Rights under the 1st Amendment
to speak about my case with others is denied with having to Certify that I under penalty and perjury
have not spoken to a lawyer for advice. But, I am threaten and Dismissed under JUDGES frivolous
whims to protect the Judiciary, the Government and the Elected Officials in the Scheme of Covering
up for each other, while I can not afford a lawyer.

The Following Subpoenas are attached:

Governor Terry McAuliffe Edward Davis
Attorney General Mark Herring James Bodie
Judge Donald Haddock James Michael McCauley
Judge Lisa Kemler Jeff Goldberg
Judge Richard Bowen Potter Ret Joe Defeo
Judge James McGrath Ret Dave Albo
Judge Nolan Dawkins Brian Moran
Judge James Clark Christopher Spera
Judge Brian Kenny Ann Schmidt
Judge Beryl A. Howell Howard Bierman
Judge Reggie Walton Ilona Ely Freedman Grenadier Heckman
Judge Gerald Lee Ben DiMuro
Judge Leonia Brinkema Michael Weiser
Judge T.S. Ellis III S. Mohsin Reza
Judge Merrick Garland Heba Carter
Justice Donald Lemons H. Carter Land
Joseph Guzinski Craig Parker
Thomas P. Gorman Judge John Tran
Diane Fiske Andrea Mosley
Katherine Baldwin Burnett Mayor Allison Silberberg
Donald Curry Jonathan Termer
Yoav Katz James L. Banks

2
Ed Semonian James Comey
Bryan Porter Marcus Wilson
Randy Sengel Captain Williams
Julie Goble Lt Rea
P. Taylor Dana Lawhorne
M Vaccaco Hunt Burke
BL. Evans
Officer Germat

Relief Requested: That these Subpoena request go to Judge Hilton. That under Rule 45 Plaintiff has
a right to subpoena witnesss for hearings. That all Subpoenas should immediately be signed. That a
Courts policy is full disclosure along with the Constitution calling for the right of all litigants to
receive BLIND Justic, due process and a fair open court hearing by a Judge with Jurisdiction. Further
sitting in Judge Hiltons court room Plaintiff heard him very clearly to another Pro Se Litigant you
must bring your evidence to the court for me to review so I can see what took place and that is
exactly what Plaintiff is trying to do. Further the subpoenas should be immediately approved or
specific law why they are being denied and how it does not prevent Due Process and Fair and unbiased
hearing on June 2, 2017.

May 5, 2017
Respectfully Submitted,

Janice Wolk Grenadier

15 W. Spring Street
Alexandria, VA 22301
202-369-7178
jwgrenadier@gmail.com

CERTIFICATION: I declare under penalty and perjury: That (1) No attorney has prepared or assisted in the
preparation of this document. Janice Wolk Grenadier Name of Pro Se Party.
_______________________________
May 5, 2017
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

Where is Janice / Plaintiff on May 2, 2017 will sent through e-mail, hand deliver, or USPS mail to:
Margeaux. S. Serrano, 202 North Ninth Street, Richmond, VA 23219. 804-786-2071
mserrano@oag.state.va.us
3