Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
Fire Ratings
Guideline on
February 2000
Fire Ratings of Archaic Materials and Assemblies
Foreword
Older buildings often contain materials that are fire safe but not list-
ed in current fire ratings sources. This lack of documentation hin-
ders the modernization and reuse of our nations building stock.
The Guideline on Fire Ratings of Archaic Materials and Assemblies
is a compilation of fire ratings from earlier sources for a wide vari-
ety of materials and assemblies found in buildings from the nine-
teenth to the mid-twentieth centuries. This guideline also provides
methods for calculating the fire resistance of general classes of
archaic materials and assemblies for which no documentation can
be found.
Susan M. Wachter
Assistant Secretary for Policy Development and Research
iv Fire Ratings of Archaic Materials and Assemblies
Fire Ratings of Archaic Materials and Assemblies v
Acknowledgments
Table of Contents
Foreword . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .iii
Acknowledgments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .v
Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .1
2Building Evaluation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .4
2.1 Preliminary Evaluation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .4
Figure II. Preliminary Evaluation Field Notes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .7
Figure III. Preliminary Evaluation Worksheet . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .9
2.2 Fire Resistance of Existing Building Elements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .8
2.3 Effects of Openings and Penetrations in Fire Resistant Assemblies on Fire
Endurance and Fire Resistance Ratings . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .8
4Summary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .20
4.1 Application for Listed Building Elements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .21
4.2 Application for Unlisted Building Elements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .21
4.3 General Application . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .22
Introduction
weakened by age or deteriora-
tion. Such an assessment may be
Modern building codes state the
fire performance of key building
The purpose of the Guideline on difficult because process and elementssuch as walls,
Fire Ratings of Archaic Materials quality control were not good in floor/ceiling assemblies, doors,
and Assemblies is to assist archi- many industries and variations and shaft enclosurein perfor-
tects, engineers, preservationists, among locally available raw mat- mance terms, as hours of fire
and code officials in evaluating erials and manufacturing tech- resistance. It does not matter
the fire safety of older buildings niques often resulted in products whether these elements were
by providing documentation on or installations that varied con- built in 1850 or 2000, only that
the fire-related performance of a siderably in strength and durabil- they provide the degree of fire
wide variety of archaic building ity. The properties of iron and resistance required by local
materials and assemblies, and, steel, for example, exhibited building regulations. This Guide-
for those cases where documen- great variation depending on the line is intended to provide a
tation cannot be found, by pro- mill and the process used. basis for the continued accep-
viding ways to evaluate general tance of archaic materials and
With this caveat, there is nothing
classes of archaic materials and assemblies that otherwise meet
inherently inferior about archaic
assemblies. The term "archaic" modern fire performance
materials or construction tech-
encompasses materials and requirements.
niques. The pressures that pro-
assemblies typical of an earlier mote changes in construction
time and no longer in common are most often economic and
use. "Fire-related performance"
includes fire resistance, flame
technologicalmatters not nec- 1
characterized in terms of "fire The fire resistance of a given properties and performance is
resistance" and require exposed building element is established widely available.
materials to be characterized in by subjecting a sample of the
Flame spread and smoke density
terms of "flame spread." assembly to a "standard" fire
are discussed below. Test results
test to determine its fire resis-
Fire resistance and flame spread for eight common species of
tance. This is essentially its
are fundamentally different para- lumber, published in an Under-
resistance to destruction (i.e.,
meters, affecting life and proper- writer's Laboratories' report of
specified loss of function)
ty safety in different ways. Fire 1952 (104), are reproduced in
throughout a prescribed time
resistance relates to structural Figure 1. Similar data can also
period in a fully developed fire.
fire performance and becomes be found in the USDA Forest
The test follows a "standard"
important only after a fire has Service, Wood Handbook
time-temperature curve derived
become established and threat- (Agriculture Handbook 72), avail-
from a methodology that has
ens a building's structural able online at www.fs.fed.us.
changed little since the 1920s.
integrity. Flame spread relates to
The fire resistance test results
the potential for fire growth
tabulated in Appendix A have
Flame Spread
within a structure. Properties
been reviewed and conservatively For regulatory purposes, the
related to flame spread are most
adjusted to reflect criteria found flame spread of interior finishes
important in the early stages of a
in the currently accepted ver- is most often measured using
fire and usually measure the per-
sions of consensus-based stan- the ASTM E 84 "tunnel test."
formance of exposed or "finish"
dard fire resistance test methods. This test measures how far and
materials within building spaces.
how fast flames spread across
Flame spread and smoke produc-
For archaic materials, flame the surface of the test sample.2
tion, not always tested for in ear-
spread properties, unlike fire The resulting flame spread rat-
lier years, are measured according
resistance properties, generally ing (FSR) is expressed as a num-
to the ASTM E 84 test method.
can be deduced through the ber on a continuous scale where
Archaic materials evaluated for
examination of materials, cement-asbestos board is 0 and
these properties generally can be
through testing according to red oak is 100 (materials with a
assumed to fall within a well-
ASTM E 84, or other methods. flame spread greater than red
known range of values because
Published data for the flame oak have a FSR greater than
the principal combustible compo-
spread properties of specific 100.) The scale is divided into
nent of these materials is cellu-
assemblies is limited, however, distinct groups or classes. The
lose. Smoke production,
except for recent products listed most commonly used flame
expressed as smoke density, con-
in handbooks. spread classifications are:
tinues to be important today.
The mitigation or treatment of Early flame spread tests, devel-
potential problems related to oped in the 1940s, included a test 2
Other accepted standard test methods for
flame spread (for example, the for smoke density (104).
assessing fire growth characteristics related
removal of suspect or defective to flame spread of finish materials include
Plastics, one of the most impor-
finish materials, or their treat- room fire tests. These may be useful for
tant classes of contemporary
ment with an appropriate coating conducting evaluations of finish materials
materials, were not found in the under the alternative materials and meth-
or low flame spread finish) will
review of archaic materials. If ods provisions of adopted codes in lieu of
generally cost less than the
plastics are to be used in a reha- providing tunnel test data. Such test meth-
treatment of fire resistance defi-
bilitated building, they should ods are typified by ASTM E 603, Standard
ciencies since the latter may Guide for Room Fire Experiments , as well
be evaluated by contemporary
affect large numbers of door as NFPA 265 and UBC Standard 8-2, both
standards. Information and doc -
assemblies or entire building of which provide a "Test Method for Evalu-
umentation of their fire-related ating Room Fire Growth Contribution of
structural systems.
Textile Wall Covering."
Fire Ratings of Archaic Materials and Assemblies 3
Smoke Density
Species of Lumber Flame Spread Smoke Density
The measurement of the density
Western White Pine 75 50 of smoke produced is specifically
Northern White Pine 120215 6065 part of the ASTM E 84 tunnel test
Ponderosa Pine 80215 100110 procedure. For the eight species
of lumber shown in Figure I, the
Yellow Pine 180190 275305
highest levels are 275305 for
Red Gum 140155 4060
yellow pine, but most of the oth-
Yellow Birch 105110 4565 ers are less smoky than red oak,
Douglas Fir 651000 10100 which has an index of 100. With
Western Hemlock 6075 40120 the exception of values observed
for some wood composites, the
smoke values listed in Figure 1
Figure I. Tunnel Test Results for Eight Species of Lumber
are well below the general limita-
tion of 450 adopted by most
building codes.
Class I or A, with a 025 FSR have higher flame spread prop-
Class II or B, with a 2675 erties than those based on the
FSR original wood species tested as a 1.2
thicker specimen. This effect Combustible
Class III or C, with a
needs to be considered in mak-
76200 FSR
ing design decisions. Construction Types
These classifications are typically One of the earliest forms of tim-
Whole wood is defined as wood
used in modern building codes ber construction used exterior
used in the same form as sawn
to restrict the rate of early fire load-bearing masonry walls with
from the tree. This is in contrast
spread on material surfaces. masonry columns or timber
to contemporary reconstituted
Since they differ, not all classes posts supporting timber beams
wood products such as plywood,
of materials can be used in all and floors in the interior of the
fiberboard, hardboard, particle
places throughout a building. building. This form of construc-
board, and oriented-strand board
For example, the flame spread tion, often called "mill" or
(OSB). If a combustible archaic
of interior finishes in vertical "heavy timber" construction, dis-
material such as a non-fire retar-
exit ways or corridors leading to plays fire resistance in excess of
dant ceiling tile is not fabricated
exits is more strictly regulated one hour. The exterior masonry
from whole wood, its flame
than are finishes in private walls will generally contain the
spread classification could be
dwelling units. fire within the building.
well over 200 and thus would be
In general, inorganic archaic particularly unsuited for use in With the development of dimen-
materials such as brick and tile exits and other critical locations sional lumber, there was a
can be expected to be in Class I. in a building. Some plywoods and switch from heavy timber to
Materials of whole wood are various wood fiberboards have "balloon frame" construction.
mostly Class II or the lower end flame spreads over 200. Although The balloon frame uses load-
of Class III, although the thick- they can be treated with fire bearing exterior wood-frame
ness of specific products is retardants to reduce their flame walls with long studs that often
important. For example, thin ply- spread, it would be advisable to extend from foundation to roof.
wood or wood-grained particle assume that all such products When long studs became scarce,
board panels reconstituted from have a flame spread of over 200 another form of construction,
whole wood and based on a unless there is information to the the "platform frame," replaced
given wood species will generally contrary. the balloon frame. This occurred
4 Fire Ratings of Archaic Materials and Assemblies
from the 1850s to the 1920s in compared to local code require- inal construction. Plans may be
different areas of the country, ments. Potential problems such on file with the local building
depending on the supply of long as performance at levels below department or in the offices of
studs. If information on the ini- local requirements are noted for the original designers or their
tial construction date of a wood- closer study. The final evaluation successors. If plans are available,
framed building is known, along phase involves developing solu- the investigator should verify
with information about local tions to upgrade, where needed, that the building was construct-
practices followed at the time of materials and assemblies to the ed according to the plans and
construction, the likelihood that required flame spread and fire whether or not the plans have
a building includes balloon resistance performance; prepar- been modified to include later
framing may be assessed and ing working drawings and speci- alterations. Earlier editions of
addressed. fications; and securing necessary the local building code may be
code approvals. on file in the building depart-
The difference between the two
ment. The code in effect at the
systems is significant because
time of construction will contain
platform framing is automatically 2.1 fire performance criteria under
fire-blocked at every floor, while
balloon framing commonly has
Preliminary Evaluation which the original building was
constructed. While this is no
concealed spaces that extend The preliminary evaluation
guarantee that the required per-
unblocked from basement to should begin with a building sur-
formance was actually provided,
attic. The architect, engineer, vey to note existing materials,
it does give the investigator
and code official must be alert the general arrangement of the
some guidance as to the level of
to the presence of such con- structure, the use of occupied
performance that may be expect-
struction details because of the spaces, and the details of con-
ed. Current code administration
ease with which fire can spread struction. The designer needs to
procedures and enforcement
in concealed building spaces. know "what is there" before a
practices will define whether the
Requirements for fire blocking decision can be reached about
requirements of the code in
and fire stopping and what to keep, what to remove,
effect at the time of construction
allowances for combustible and and what to upgrade during the
complies with currently required
noncombustible concealed rehabilitation process.
levels of performance.
spaces are set forth in local
The evaluation must take into
building regulations. Figure II illustrates one method
account the former and project-
for organizing preliminary field
ed uses of the building and
notes, with space provided for
modifications to its mechanical,
2
plumbing, and electrical sys-
noting the materials, dimen-
sions, and condition of the prin-
tems. Seismic events, fires, and
Building Evaluation
other accidents as well as non-
cipal building elements. Each
floor of the structure should be
A given rehabilitation project conforming alterations must be
visited. In practice, there will
will most likely go through sev- researched. Finally, archaic
often be identical materials and
eral stages. The preliminary materials and assemblies must
construction on every floor, but
evaluation process involves sur- be evaluated against applicable
any exceptions may be of vital
veying the prospective building, code requirements.
importance. A schematic dia-
where the flame spread perfor- Two possible sources of infor- gram should be prepared for
mance and fire resistance per- mation helpful in the prelimi- each floor showing the layout of
formance of existing building nary evaluation are the original exits and hallways and indicating
materials and construction building plans and the building where each element described in
systems are identified and code in effect at the time of orig- the field notes fits into the
Fire Ratings of Archaic Materials and Assemblies 5
structure as a whole. The loca- openings as well as the thick- Figure II includes categories for
tions of stairways and elevators ness and framing of any wired several types of walls. Since
should be clearly marked on the glass. The protection of open- under some circumstances a
drawings. All exterior means of ings adjacent to and potential- building may have only one type
escape should be identified. ly affecting any exterior means of wall construction and in others
The exact arrangement of interi- of egress, such as exterior it may have several, the occur-
or walls is of secondary impor- stairs and fire escapes, is also rence and function of walls
tance from a fire safety point of important. The ground floor must be carefully noted and
view and need not be shown on drawing should locate the evaluated.
the drawings unless they are building on the property and
The field investigator should be
required by code. indicate precise distances to
alert for differences in function
adjacent buildings.
The following notes explain the as well as in materials and con-
entries in Figure II. Interior Bearing Walls. It may struction details. In multiunit
be difficult to tell whether or buildings, for example, wall
Exterior Bearing Walls. Many
not an interior wall is load bear- details within apartments gener-
old buildings utilize exterior
ing, but the field investigator ally are not as important as the
walls to support the
should attempt to make this functions of separation walls or
floor/ceiling assemblies at
determination. At a later stage walls along defined egress paths
the building perimeter. There
of the rehabilitation process, and stairwells.
may be columns or interior
this question will need to be
bearing walls within the struc- The preliminary field investiga-
answered exactly. Therefore,
ture, but the exterior walls tion should attempt to deter-
the field notes should be as
and their fire resistance are an mine the thickness of all walls.
accurate as possible.
important factor in assessing A term introduced below called
the building's fire safety. Note Interior Nonbearing Walls
"thickness design" will depend
how the floor/ceiling assem- (Partitions). A partition is a
on an accurate ( 1/4 inch)
blies are supported at their "wall that extends from floor
determination of thickness. Even
interface with the exterior to ceiling and subdivides
though this initial field survey is
walls of the building. If col- space within any story of a
called "preliminary," the data
umns are incorporated in the building" (48). Besides provid-
generated should be as accurate
exterior walls, the walls may ing for general separation of
and complete as possible.
be considered nonbearing. spaces within buildings, parti-
tions also may have fire safety The field investigator should
Exterior Nonbearing Walls.
functions that entail specific note the exact location from
The fire resistance of exterior
fire resistance requirements. which his or her observations
walls is an important factor
Examples include party walls, are recorded. For instance, if a
for two reasons. These walls
occupancy separations, hole is found through a stairwell
(both bearing and non-bearing)
smoke barriers, and corridor wall that allows a cataloguing of
are depended upon to contain
and exit enclosures. These the construction details, the
a fire within the building of
must be clearly identified and field investigation notes should
origin, or to keep a fire origi-
may include fire-rated walls reflect the location of the "find."
nating outside of a building
that provide the same func- At the preliminary stage it is not
from igniting that building
tions. When such walls necessary to core walls, since
either on the exterior or the
enclose a means of egress, the interior details of construc-
interior. It is, therefore,
the required flame spread tion usually can be determined
important to indicate on the
properties of finish materials at some location.
drawings the location and
also must be accounted for.
construction of all windows,
doors, shutters, and other
6 Fire Ratings of Archaic Materials and Assemblies
Structural Frame. There may attention should be paid to Materials. The field investiga-
or may not be a complete the cover on structural steel tor should be able to identify
skeletal frame, but usually elements and the nature and commonly found building
there are columns, beams, condition of suspended ceil- materials in a given geographic
trusses, or similar elements. ings and similar membranes. area. In situations where an
The dimensions and spacing Roofs. If it is apparent that unfamiliar material is found,
of the structural elements the roof is sound for ordinary a sample should be obtained.
should be measured and indi- use and can be retained in the Thickness. The thickness of
cated on the drawings. For rehabilitated building, it then all materials should be
instance, if 10-inch-square becomes necessary to evaluate measured accurately since
columns are located on a its fire performance. The field under most circumstances
30-foot-square grid through- investigator must measure the anticipated levels of fire resis-
out the building, this should thickness and identify the tance are very sensitive to the
be noted. The structural mate- types of materials that have material thickness.
rial and its protective cover- been used. Be aware that there Condition. The method of
ing, if any, should be identi- may be several layers of roof- attaching the various layers
fied wherever possible. The ing materials present and that and facings to one another or
thickness of the cover materi- the number may be limited by to the supporting structural
als should be determined to the local building code. element should be noted
an accuracy of 1/4 inch. In a
Doors. Doors to corridors and under the appropriate build-
case in Chicago, local code
exits represent some of the ing element. The "secureness"
officials found that in many
most important fire resistive of the attachment and the
older buildings slated for ren-
elements within a building. general condition of the layers
ovation, original wood timber
The uses of the spaces sepa- and facings also should be
columns had been replaced
rated by the doors largely con- noted.
by nonfire-rated metal col-
trols the level of fire perfor- Notes. The "Notes" column
umns, degrading the struc-
mance necessary. Walls and can be used for many purpos-
ture's potential fire endur-
doors enclosing stairs or ele- es, including providing specific
ance. The performance of the
vator shafts normally require references to other field notes
metal columns was readily
a higher level of performance or drawings, such as those
upgraded, however, by pro-
than between a bedroom and describing the occupancy of
viding fire resistive cladding
bath. The various uses are the building or space and the
to achieve the required hourly
differentiated in Figure II. functions of its components.
fire ratings.
Careful measurements of the
Floor/Ceiling Structural After the building survey is com-
thickness of door panels
Systems. A sketch of the pleted, the data collected must
must be made and the type of
cross section of the structural be analyzed. A suggested work
core material within each
system should be made. If sheet for organizing this infor-
door must be determined.
there is no location where mation is shown in Figure III.
Note whether doors have self-
accidental damage has opened
closing devices and check the Requirements for fire resistance
the floor/ceiling construction
general operation of the and the flame spread properties
to visual inspection, it is nec-
doors. Latches should engage of each building element are nor-
essary to make such an open-
and doors should fit tightly in mally established by the local
ing. An evaluation of the fire
the frame. Hinges should be building code. The fire perfor-
resistance of a floor/ceiling
in good condition. Identify mance of the existing materials
assembly requires detailed
any door glazing and note its and assemblies should be
knowledge of the materials
framing material. estimated using one of the
and their arrangement. Special
Fire Ratings of Archaic Materials and Assemblies 7
Exterior nonbearing
walls
Interior nonbearing
walls or partitions A
B
Structural frame:
Columns
Beams
Other
Floor/ceiling structural
system:
Spanning
Roofs
Doors (including
frame and hardware):
Enclosed vertical
exitway
Enclosed horizontal
exitway
Other
techniques described below. If floor/ceiling assemblies, beams, ation: if the existing assembly is
the fire performance of the and doors. Within each building not one of the smaller number of
existing building element(s) is element, the tables are organized entries with a lower than re-
equal to or greater than that by type of construction, such as quired fire resistance, there is a
required, the materials and masonry, metal, or wood frame, strong possibility the existing
assemblies may be considered then further divided by minimum assembly will be acceptable.
acceptable as they are. If the fire dimensions or the thickness of
At some point, the existing
performance is less than the building element.
building component or assembly
required, corrective measures
A histogram precedes every must be located within the tables.
must be taken.
table that has ten or more If not, its fire resistance must be
The most common methods of entries. Its X-axis measures fire determined through one of the
upgrading the level of protec- resistance in hours and its other techniques presented here-
tion are either the removal and Y-axis shows the number of in. Locating the building compo-
replacement of the existing entries in that table having a nent in the tables in Appendix A
building elements or repairing given level of fire resistance. not only documents the accuracy
and upgrading them. Other fire The histograms also contain the of its fire resistance rating, but
protection measures, such as location of each entry within the provides a source of that docu-
automatic sprinklers or detec- table for easy cross referencing. mentation for the building official.
tion and alarm systems, also can
Because they are keyed to the
be considered, but they are
beyond the scope of this Guide-
tables, the histograms usually 2.3
Exterior nonbearing
walls
Interior nonbearing
walls or partitions A
B
Structural frame:
Columns
Beams
Other
Floor/ceiling structural
system:
Spanning
Roofs
Doors (including
frame and hardware):
Enclosed vertical
exitway
Enclosed horizontal
exitway
Other
refers to passages for mechani- A fully developed fire generates sent in buildings (as well as
cal or electrical services for tra- substantial quantities of heat and mechanical or electrical/commu-
versing assemblies found in a gaseous fuels capable of pene- nication systems whose compo-
building. Each requires a differ- trating unprotected openings or nents are associated with fire
ent fire resistance test method non-fire-stopped holes that resistive assemblies or compo-
to be evaluated, and each gener- might be present in the walls or nents) must be carefully consid-
ates different information. floors and ceilings of a fire- ered. Materials available to miti-
affected compartment. The pres- gate these potential problems
The most common examples of
ence of such unprotected open- include listed intumescent and
penetrations are pipes and utili-
ings and penetrations can lead to other insulating firestopping
ty wires passed through holes
a severe degradation of the fire materials, systems, and assem-
poked through an assembly.
resistance of those building ele- blies as found in listing hand-
Their performance will have
ments and to a greater potential books from approved third
been qualified for use in new
for fire spread. This is particular- party laboratories.
buildings by testing according to
ly true for penetrations located
the ASTM E 814, Standard Test Building codes require doors
high in a compartment where the
Method for Fire Tests of installed in fire resistive walls to
positive pressure of the fire can
Through-Penetration Fire Stops, resist the passage of fire for a
force unburned gases through
and its derivative standards pro- specified period of time. If the
such a penetration.
mulgated by ANSI and NFPA. door to a room with a fully
During the life of the building, Unprotected penetrations in a developed fire is not closed, a
however, many penetrations floor/ceiling assembly will gen - large plume of fire will typically
may have been added, and by erally completely negate the bar- escape through the doorway,
the time a building is ready for rier qualities of the assembly preventing anyone from using
rehabilitation it is not sufficient and will lead to rapid spread of the space outside the door while
just to consider the fire resis- fire to the space above. It will allowing the fire to spread. This
tance of the assembly as origi- not be a problem, however, if is why the presence of effective
nally constructed. the penetrations are filled with door closers and an absence of
noncombustible or other fire- obstacles to the timely closing
It is also necessary to consider
rated materials adequately of fire doors in an emergency
all classes of penetrations and
attached to the structure. The are so important.
openings and their relative
threat to the upper two-thirds of
impact upon fire performance. Glass in doors and transoms can
walls exposed to fire will be sim-
For instance, the fire resistance be expected to shatter rapidly
ilar to that experienced by the
of a corridor wall may be less unless constructed of listed or
floor/ceiling assemblies under-
important in a given building approved wired glass in a steel
going a fire exposure from
application than the effect of frame or other contemporary
below. This is because a positive
plain glass being present in fire-rated glazing products now
pressure can be reasonably
doors or transoms since the lat- available. As with other building
expected to be present in the
ter will lead to very early fail- elements, non-firestopped pene-
top of any room exposed to a
ures. Generally speaking, a trations or nonrated openings
fully developed fire, and such an
building's doors and associated including those created by win-
exposure can be expected to
installation features (hardware, dows and transoms must be
push hot and burning gases
frames, transoms, and glazing) upgraded or otherwise protected.
through any penetrations pre-
represent the most important
sent unless they are completely As part of ongoing rehabilitation
single class of openings having a
sealed. In the same context, the efforts in older buildings, signif-
crucial fire safety function that
performance of all components icant research directed at
needs to be addressed.
related to HVAC systems pre- upgrading the fire resistance of
Fire Ratings of Archaic Materials and Assemblies 11
be costly and time consuming lation and mathematical model - of the individual layers when
because specimens must be ing, thermodynamics, heat-flow
exposed separately to fire.
taken from the building and analysis, and materials science
transported to the testing labo- to predict the fire performance The minimum performance of an
ratory. For testing of flame of a material or assembly. untested assembly can be esti-
spread of finish materials by mated if the fire endurance of
Where properties other than fire
ASTM E 84, testing will require a the individual components is
endurance are concerned, the
sample two feet wide and 25 known. Though the exact rating
evaluation of materials for heat
feet long, which may be taken in of the assembly cannot be stated,
release through the use of cone
three sections. For testing by the endurance of the assembly
calorimeter techniques (see
ASTM E 119 of a load-bearing is greater than the sum of the
ASTM E 1354) or through use of
assembly that has continuous endurance of the components.
the intermediate scale calorime-
reinforcement, the test specimen This rule can be exemplified by
ter "ICAL" (see ASTM E 1623)
must be removed from the the fact that the fire endurance
may be appropriate. Such an
building, transported, and tested of multiple sheets of gypsum
evaluation can be included as
in one piece. wallboard, such as those of
one component of a fire hazard
In special cases, a "nonstandard" analysis conducted for review by other fire-rated materials, will
small-scale test may be used the code official for a given pro- exceed the fire endurance of
with the concurrence of the ject design. The evaluation of individual fire-rated slabs of the
building official for fire flame spread by the LIFT (linear same total thickness.
endurance testing. Sample sizes ignition and flame travel) appa- When a building assembly or
need only be 10 to 25 square ratus (see ASTM E 1321) or component is found to be defi-
feet, while full-scale tests room fire testing of unusual or cient, the fire endurance can be
require test samples of either poorly characterized finish upgraded by providing a protec-
100 or 180 square feet in size. materials based on the tech- tive membrane. This membrane
The small-scale test is best suited niques found in ASTM E 603, could be a new layer of brick,
for testing non-load bearing cited earlier, also may be of use. plaster, or drywall. The fire
assemblies against thermal endurance of this membrane is
One theoretical method is the
transmission only. called the "finish rating." Tables
"Ten Rules of Fire Endurance
For alternates to flame spread Rating," published by T. Z. 1.5.1 and 1.5.2 in Appendix A
testing according to ASTM E 84, Harmathy in the May 1965 edi- contain the finish ratings for the
consider the methods described tion of Fire Technology (35). most commonly employed materi-
in the next section. Harmathy's Rules provide a als (see also the notes to Rule 2).
foundation for extending the The test criteria for the finish
data in Appendix A. rating is the same as for the
3.2 thermal fire endurance of the
The Theoretical Approach total assembly: average tempera-
Harmathy's Ten Rules ture increases of 250F above
Theoretical methods offer an
alternative to the full-scale fire
of Fire Endurance Rating
tests discussed above. For exam-
ple, most codes allow alternate Rule 1: The "thermal" fire
3
The thermal fire endurance is the time at
materials and methods to be endurance3 of a construction which the average temperature on the
used based on test data and consisting of a number of par- unexposed side of a construction exceeds
engineering analyses in lieu of allel layers is greater than the its initial value by 250F when the other
full-scale tests. These analyses side is exposed to the standard fire speci-
sum of each "thermal" fire fied by ASTM Test Method E 119.
may draw upon computer simu-
endurance that is characteristic
Fire Ratings of Archaic Materials and Assemblies 13
ambient or 325F above ambient rule should not be applied with- exceptions to this rule because of
at any one place with the mem- out careful consideration. the possible development of
brane being exposed to the fire. burning in the gap.
Particular care must be taken if
The temperature is measured at
the material added is a good There are numerous examples
the interface of the assembly
thermal insulator. Properly locat- of this rule in the tables. For
and the protective membrane.
ed, the added insulation could instance:
improve the "thermal" perfor- Table 1.1.4; Item W-8-M-82: Cored
Rule 2: The fire endurance mance of the assembly. Improp- concrete masonry, nominal 8-inch
of a construction does not erly located, the insulation could thick wall with one unit in wall thick-
decrease with the addition of block necessary thermal trans- ness and with 62% minimum of
further layers. mission through the assembly, solid material in each unit, load
thereby subjecting the structural bearing (80 psi). Fire endurance:
Harmathy notes that this rule is
elements to greater tempera- 2 1/2 hours.
a consequence of the previous
tures for longer periods of time,
rule. Its validity follows from the Table 1.1.5; Item W-10-M-11:
and could cause premature
fact that the additional layers Cored concrete masonry, nominal
structural failure of the support- 10-inch thick wall with two units in
increase both the resistance to
ing members. wall thickness and a 2-inch air
heat flow and the heat capacity
of the construction. This, in turn, Under this rule, the addition of space, load bearing (80 psi).
reduces the rate of temperature new components, such as EIFS The units are essentially the same
rise at the unexposed surface. systems, must be evaluated with
as item W-8-M-82. Fire endurance:
3 1/2 hours.
care where they can affect fire
This rule is not just restricted to
performance. These walls show 1-hour greater
"thermal" performance but
fire endurance by the addition
affects the other fire test crite-
ria: direct flame passage, cotton Rule 3: The fire endurance of of the 2-inch air space.
waste ignition, and load bearing constructions containing con-
performance. This means that tinuous air gaps or cavities is Rule 4: The farther an air gap
certain restrictions must be greater than the fire endur- or cavity is located from the
imposed on the materials to be ance of similar constructions exposed surface, the more
added and on the loading condi- of the same weight, but con- beneficial is its effect on the
tions. One restriction is that a fire endurance.
taining no air gaps or cavities.
new layer, if applied to the
exposed surface, must not pro- Voids in a construction provide Radiation dominates the heat
duce additional thermal stresses additional resistance in the path transfer across an air gap or
in the construction, i.e., its ther- of heat flow. Numerical heat cavity and it is markedly higher
mal expansion characteristics flow analyses indicate that a 10 where the temperature is higher.
must be similar to those of the to 15 percent increase in fire The air gap or cavity is thus a
adjacent layer. Each new layer endurance can be achieved by poor insulator if it is located in
must also be capable of con- creating an air gap at the mid- a region that attains high tem-
tributing enough additional plane of a brick wall. Since the peratures during fire exposure.
strength to the assembly to sus- gross volume is also increased Some of the clay tile designs take
tain the added dead load. If this by the presence of voids, the air advantage of these factors. The
requirement is not fulfilled, the gaps and cavities have a benefi- double cell design, for instance,
allowable live load must be cial effect on stability as well. insures that there is a cavity near
reduced by an amount equal to However, constructions contain- the unexposed face. Some
the weight of the new layer. ing combustible materials within floor/ceiling assemblies have air
Because of these limitations, this an air gap may be regarded as gaps or cavities near the top sur-
14 Fire Ratings of Archaic Materials and Assemblies
face and these enhance their Rule 7: The fire endurance of materials such as dense
thermal performance. asymmetrical construction concrete. In general, one can
assume that extremely old con-
constructions that are not
Rule 5: The fire endurance identical on both sides of their
crete has developed enough
of a construction cannot be minor cracking that this factor
central linedepends on the should not be significant.
increased by increasing the direction of heat flow.
thickness of a completely
This rule is a consequence of Rule 9: Load-supporting
enclosed air layer.
Rules 4 and 6 as well as other elements, such as beams,
Harmathy notes that there is factors. This rule is useful in girders and joists, yield higher
evidence that if the thickness of determining the relative protec - fire endurances when subject-
the air layer is larger than about tion of corridors and stairwells
1/2 inch, the heat transfer
ed to fire endurance tests as
from the surrounding spaces. In
through the air layer depends parts of floor, roof, or ceiling
addition, there are often situa-
only on the temperature of the tions where a fire is more likely, assemblies than they would
bounding surfaces, and is practi- or potentially more severe, from when tested separately.
cally independent of the dis- one side or the other. One of the fire endurance test
tance between them. This rule is
criteria is the ability of a load-
not applicable if the air layer is Rule 8: The presence of mois- supporting element to carry its
not completely enclosed, i.e., if
ture, if it does not result in intended live and dead load. The
there is a possibility of fresh air
explosive spalling, increases element will be deemed to have
entering the gap at an apprecia-
the fire endurance. failed when the load can no
ble rate.
longer be supported.
The flow of heat into an assem-
Rule 6: Layers of materials of bly is greatly hindered by the Failure usually results for two
reasons. Some materials, partic-
low thermal conductivity are release and evaporation of the
moisture found within cementi- ularly steel and other metals,
better utilized on that side of
tious materials such as gypsum, lose much of their structural
the construction on which fire strength at elevated tempera-
Portland cement, or magnesium
is more likely to happen. tures. Physical deflection of the
oxychloride. Harmathy has
As in Rule 4, the reason lies in shown that the gain in fire supporting element, due to
the heat transfer process, endurance may be as high as decreased strength or thermal
though the conductivity of the 8 percent for each percent (by expansion, causes a redistribu-
solid is much less dependent on volume) of moisture in the con- tion of the load forces and
the ambient temperature of the struction. It is the moisture stresses throughout the element.
materials. The low thermal con- chemically bound within the con- Structural failure often results
ductor creates a substantial tem- struction material at the time of because the supporting element
perature differential to be estab- manufacture or processing that is not designed to carry the
lished across its thickness under leads to increased fire redistributed load.
transient heat flow conditions. endurance. There is no direct Roof, floor, and ceiling assem-
This rule may not be applicable relationship between the relative blies may have primary (e.g.,
to materials undergoing physi- humidity of the air in the pores beams) and secondary (e.g., floor
cal-chemical changes accompa- of the material and the increase joists) structural members. Since
nied by significant heat absorp- in fire endurance. the primary load-supporting ele-
tion or heat evolution. ments span the largest distances,
Under certain conditions there
may be explosive spalling of their deflection becomes signifi-
low permeability cementitious cant at a stage when the strength
Fire Ratings of Archaic Materials and Assemblies 15
of the secondary members the performance of this latter Is this assembly capable of provid-
(including the roof or floor sur- element is not known from a ing a 2-hour protection?
face) is hardly affected by the separate (beam) test. Because of Solution
heat. As the secondary members the load-reducing effect of the
follow the deflection of the pri- secondary elements that results (1) This partition does not appear in
the tables in Appendix A.
mary load-supporting element, from a test performed on an
an increasingly larger portion of assembly, the performance of (2) Bricks of this thickness yield fire
the load is transferred to the the supporting element alone endurances of approximately 75 min-
secondary members. cannot be evaluated by simple utes (Table 1.1.2, Item W-4-M-2).
arithmetic. This rule also indi- (3) The 1 1/4 inch thick plywood has
When load-supporting elements
cates the advantage of perform- a finish rating of 30 minutes.
are tested separately, the
ing separate fire tests on primary
imposed load is constant and (4) The 3/8-inch gypsum wallboard
load-supporting elements.
equal to the design load through- has a finish rating of 10 minutes.
out the test. By definition, no dis-
(5) Using the recommended values
tribution of the load is possible Illustration of from the tables and applying Rule 1,
because the element is being
tested by itself. Without any
Harmathy's Rules the fire endurance (FI) of the
assembly is larger than the sum of
other structural members to Harmathy provided one schematic
the individual layers, or
which the load could be trans- figure that illustrated his Rules.4
ferred, the individual elements It should be useful as a quick FI > 75 + 30 + 10 = 115 minutes
cannot yield a higher fire reference to assist in applying Discussion
endurance than they do when his Rules. (See Figure IV.)
tested as parts of a floor, roof This example illustrates how the
tables in Appendix A can be utilized
or ceiling assembly. Example Application of to determine the fire resistance of
Harmathy's Rules assemblies not explicitly listed.
Rule 10: The load-supporting
elements (beams, girders, The following examples, based Example 2
joists, etc.) of a floor, roof, or in whole or in part upon those Problem
ceiling assembly can be presented in Harmathy's paper
(35), show how the Rules can be (1) A number of buildings to be
replaced by such other load- rehabilitated have the same type of
applied to practical cases.
supporting elements that, roof slab that is supported with dif-
when tested separately, yielded Example 1 ferent structural elements.
fire endurances not less than Problem (2) The designer and contractor
that of the assembly. A contractor would like to keep a would like to determine whether or
not this roof slab is capable of yield-
This rule depends on Rule 9 for partition that consists of a 3 3/4 inch
ing a 2-hour fire endurance. Accord-
its validity. A beam or girder, if thick layer of red clay brick, a 1 1/4
ing to a rigorous interpretation of
capable of yielding a certain per- inch thick layer of plywood, and a
ASTM E 119, however, only the roof
formance when tested separately, 3/8-inch thick layer of gypsum wall-
assembly, including the roof slab as
will yield an equally good or bet- board, at a location where 2-hour
well as the cover and the supporting
ter performance when it forms a fire endurance is required.
elements, can be subjected to a fire
part of a floor, roof, or ceiling test. Therefore, a fire endurance
assembly. It must be empha- classification cannot be issued for
sized that the supporting ele-
4
Reproduced from the May 1965 Fire
the slabs separately.
Technology (vol. 1, no. 2). Copyright
ment of one assembly must not
National Fire Protection Association, (3) The designer and contractor
be replaced by the supporting Boston. Reproduced by Permission. believe this slab will yield a 2-hour
element of another assembly if
16 Fire Ratings of Archaic Materials and Assemblies
fire endurance even without the including the slabs, cannot be less (4) The supporting structure or ele -
cover, and any beam of at least than 2 hours. ment would have to have at least a
2-hour fire endurance will provide 2-hour fire endurance when tested
(3) The recommended procedure
satisfactory support. Is it possible to separately.
would be to review the tables to see
obtain a classification for the slab
if the slab appears as part of any Discussion
separately?
tested roof or floor/ceiling assembly.
If the tables did not include tests on
Solution The supporting system can be
assemblies that contained the slab,
regarded as separate from the slab
(1) The answer to the question is yes. one procedure would be to assem-
specimen, and the fire endurance of
ble the roof slabs on any convenient
(2) According to Rule 10, it is not the assembly listed in the table is at
supporting system (not regarded as
contrary to common sense to test least the fire endurance of the slab.
part of the specimen) and to subject
and classify roofs and supporting There would have to be an adjust-
them to a load that, besides the
elements separately. Furthermore, ment for the weight of the roof cover
usually required superimposed load,
according to Rule 2, if the roof slabs in the allowable load if the test
includes some allowances for the
actually yield a 2-hour fire endur- specimen did not contain a cover.
weight of the cover.
ance, the endurance of an assembly,
fire resistance of an assembly For other types of building ele- method of analysis, an x-ray,
listed in the table having a simi- ments (e.g., beams, columns), the often cannot provide the neces-
lar design but with less cover or tables in Appendix A can be used sary detail. It is for these, and
thinner slabs. For other structur- to establish a minimum level of similar reasons, that a fire test
al elements (e.g., beams and fire performance, eliminating the may still be necessary.
columns), the element listed in need for a fire test. For doors,
It is often possible to upgrade
the table must also be of a simi- however, this cannot be done. The
the fire performance of an exist-
lar design but with less cover data contained in Appendix A,
ing door. Existing and modified
thickness. "Table 5.1, Resistance of Doors to
doors can be evaluated side-by-
Fire Exposure," and Appendix B,
side in a single series of fire
"Upgrading the Fire Resistance of
3.4 Wood Panel Doors," only can pro-
tests, where the failure of the
unmodified door is expected.
Evaluation of Doors vide guidance as to whether a suc-
Because doors upgraded after an
cessful fire test is even feasible.
A separate section on doors is initial failure must be tested
included in this Guideline For example, a door required to again, the side-by-side approach
because the process for evalua- have 1-hour fire resistance is can save time and money.
tion presented below differs noted in the tables as providing
The most common ways that the
from those suggested previously only 5 minutes. The likelihood of
fire resistance of door assem-
for other building elements. The achieving the required 1 hour,
blies is reduced are: the pres-
impact of unprotected openings even if the door is upgraded, is
ence of ventilating elements,
or penetrations in fire-resistant remote. The ultimate need for
including transoms; the pres-
assemblies has been discussed replacement of the doors is rea-
ence of plain, non-fire-resistant
in Section 2.3 and the impor- sonably clear, and the expense
glass; insufficient thickness or
tance of door performance on and time needed for testing can
poor condition of plywood door
life safety has been stressed. be saved. However, if the perfor-
panels and panel inserts; and
Consistent with this, it is suffi- mance documented in the table is
the improper fit of a door in its
cient to note here that improp- near or in excess of what is being
frame.
erly or inadequately protected required, then a fire test should
door openings will likely lead to be conducted. The test documen- Approaches to solving these
failure of the wall in which they tation can then be used as evi- problems, as shown in Figure V
are installed under actual fire dence of compliance with the and Appendix B, are as follows:
conditions. required level of performance. Permanently sealing ventilat-
The table entries cannot be used ing elements, such as tran-
In all cases, local code require-
as the sole proof of performance soms or ventilation openings
ments for opening protection
of the door in question because in doors, and upgrading their
should be carefully evaluated
since many (but not all) 1-hour there are other variables that fire resistance to match that
wall assemblies, for example, could measurably affect fire per- of their door assemblies,
formance. The wood may have unless they can be made to
require only 20-minute-rated
become embrittled over the years, close automatically when a
doors to be used. Thus, use of a
or multiple coats of flammable fire threat is present. Note
1-hour rated fire door assembly
varnish could have been added. that the health and comfort
under such conditions would
Minor deviations in the internal consequences of sealing ven-
present an unwarranted eco-
construction of a door can also tilating elements must be
nomic hardship.
result in significant differences in thoroughly evaluated before
performance. Methods of secur- such work is performed.
ing inserts in panel doors can
vary. The major non-destructive
Fire Ratings of Archaic Materials and Assemblies 19
Replacing plain glass in doors, Because the interior construc - which sufficient construction
transoms and sidelights with tion of a door cannot be deter- materials are present to provide
approved or listed wired glass mined by a visual inspection, needed fire endurance but that
or a contemporary fire-resis- there is no absolute guarantee fail because of untimely door
tant glazing product installed that the remaining doors are opening are well known to fire
in an approved steel or wood identical to the one(s) tested. testing laboratories and
frame (167). But the same is true for doors engineers. See Figure V.
Upgrading panel inserts either constructed today, and reason
by replacing existing panel and judgment must be applied.
materials with materials of Doors that appear identical
upon visual inspection can be
4
4.1
4.2
be greater than that specified
in the table.
Application for
Application for
4.3
General Application
The fire resistance of building
elements can be established
by applying Harmathy's Ten
Rules of Fire Endurance
Rating as set forth in Section
3.2, subject to the following
The data from the tables can
be utilized subject to the limi-
tations in 4.2, above.
Test reports from recognized
journals or published papers
can be used to support data
utilized in applying Harmathy's
Rules.
Calculations utilizing recog-
nized and well established
computational techniques can
be used in applying Harmathy's
Rules. These include, but are
not limited to, analysis of heat
flow, mechanical properties,
deflections, and load bearing
capacity.
Appendix AFire Rating Tables A-1
Table of Contents
Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .A3
2.5.1.1 Steel Columns/Concrete Encasements . . . .Minimum Dimension less than 6" . . . . . . . .A82
2.5.2.1 Steel Columns/Brick and Block Encasements .Minimum Dimension 10"12" . . . . . . . . . . . .A96
2.5.2.2 Steel Columns/Brick and Block Encasements .Minimum Dimension 12"14" . . . . . . . . . . . .A-97
2.5.2.3 Steel Columns/Brick and Block Encasements .Minimum Dimension 14"16" . . . . . . . . . . . .A97
3.4 Hollow Clay Tile with Reinforced Concrete . .Assembly Thickness . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .A118
Introduction
Thickness. This column iden-
tifies the dimension with the
column is labeled "Time" and
denotes the actual fire
The tables and histograms that greatest impact on fire resis- endurance time observed in
follow are to be used only with- tance. The critical dimension the fire test.
in the analytical framework for walls (the example shown Reference Number. This col-
described in this Guideline. here) is thickness, but it dif- umn refers to the 1942
fers for other building ele- National Bureau of Standards
Histograms precede any table ments. For instance, the criti- publication, Building Material
with ten or more entries. The cal dimension for beams is Standard 92, "Fire-Resistance
use and interpretation of the
depth and for some floor/ Classifications of Building
histograms is explained in
ceiling assemblies it is mem- Constructions" (1). The col-
Section 2, above. brane thickness. The dimen- umn is subdivided into three
The table format is similar to sion shown is the one mea- parts: Pre-BMS-92, BMS-92,
the one used by the model sured at the time of actual and Post BMS-92. Table
codes. Figure VI below, taken testing to within 1/8-inch tol- entries refer to the number of
from an entry in Table 1.1.2, erance. The thickness includes the entry in the bibliography
explains the column headings: facings when they are part of containing the original source
Item Code. This column con- the wall construction. reference for the test data.
tains the item code for each Construction Details. This Notes. The entries in this col-
building element. The code column provides a brief umn refer to notes at the end
consists of a four-place description of the building of the table that contain a
series, such as W-4-M-50, element. more detailed explanation of
where: Performance. This column is certain aspects of the test. In
W = type of building element; subdivided into two columns some tables, note numbers
W = walls, F = floors, etc. in most tables. The first is also appear under the head-
labeled "Load" and either lists ings "Construction Details"
4 = the building element thickness
the load that the building ele- and "Load."
rounded down to the nearest one-
ment was subjected to during Rec Hours. This column lists
inch increment (for example, 4 5/8"
the fire test or refers to a the recommended fire
is rounded off to 4").
note at the bottom of the endurance rating, in hours or
M = the general type of material table that provides informa- minutes, of the subject build-
from which the building element is tion on the load or other sig- ing element. This rating is
constructed; M = masonry, W = nificant details. If the build- always less than or equal to
wood, etc. ing element was not subject- the rating under the "Time"
50 = the sequence number of the ed to a load during the test, column.
particular building element in a the entry will be "n/a" for
table. "not applicable." The second
Section IWalls
Figure 1.1.1
Table 1.1.1
Masonry Walls, 0" to less than 4" thick 15. Two cells in wall thickness.
partitions.
19. Medium-burned clay tile.
that hose stream testing where carried out was run on test specimens
contemporarily done.
8. Hose streampass.
27. Blocks laid in 1:3 sanded gypsum mortar voids in blocks not to exceed
11. For clay tile walls, unless the source or density of the clay can be pos-
30%.
for the fire endurance of a clay tile partition of that thickness be followed.
28. Units of expanded slag or pumice aggregates.
12. See appendix for construction and design details for clay tile walls.
30. Units of calcareous sand and gravel. Coarse aggregate, 60% or more cal-
13. Load80 psi for gross wall area.
cite and dolomite.
Note 39, Table 1.1.1. Designs of tiles used in The four types of construction used in fire-test partitions.
fire-test partitions.
Appendix AFire Rating Tables A-7
36. Ratings based on one unit and one cell in wall thickness.
39. See Clay Tile Partition Design Construction drawings, opposite page.
Figure 1.1.2
Masonry Walls, 4" (100 mm) to less than 6" (150 mm) thick
A-8 Fire Ratings of Archaic Materials and Assemblies
Table 1.1.2
Masonry Walls, 4" (100 mm) to less than 6" (150 mm) thick
Table 1.1.2Notes 4. For clay tile walls, unless the source of the clay can be positively iden-
Masonry Walls, 4" to less than 6" thick tified, it is suggested that the most pessimistic hour rating for the fire
endurance of a clay tile partition of that thickness be followed.
1. Tested at NBS under ASASpec. No. A 21934. Identified sources of clay showing longer fire endurance can lead to
longer time recommendations.
2. Failure modemaximum temperature rise.
5. See appendix for construction and design details for clay tile walls.
3. Tested at NBS under ASASpec. No. 421934 (ASTM C-19-53) except
that hose stream testing where carried out was run on test specimens 6. Failure modeflame thru or crack formation showing flames.
exposed for full test duration, not for a reduced period as is contem-
porarily done. 7. Hole formed at 25 minutes; partition collapsed at 42 minutes on
removal from furnace.
8. Failure modecollapse.
Appendix AFire Rating Tables A-15
clay or shale.
29. Units of calcareous sand and gravel. Coarse aggregate, 60% or more cal-
12. One cell in wall thickness.
cite and dolomite.
15. One cell in wall thickness, cells filled with broken tile, crushed stone,
32. Unit at least 62% solid.
35. Ratings based on one unit and one cell in wall thickness.
18. Not less than 5/8" thickness of 1:3 sanded gypsum plaster.
26. Laid in 1:3 sanded gypsum mortar. Voids in hollow units not to
exceed 30%.
Note 36, Table 1.1.2. Designs of tiles used in The four types of construction used in fire-test partitions.
fire-test partitions.
A-16 Fire Ratings of Archaic Materials and Assemblies
Figure 1.1.3
Masonry Walls, 6" (150 mm) to less than 8" (200 mm) thick
Table 1.1.3
Masonry Walls, 6" (150 mm) to less than 8" (200 mm) thick
43. Concrete units made with calcareous sand and gravel. Coarse aggregate,
24. All tiles laid in portland cement-lime mortar. 60% or more calcite and dolomite.
25. Load80 psi for gross cross-sectional area of wall. 44. Concrete units made with siliceous sand and gravel. 90% or more quartz,
27. Minimum % of solid material in concrete units: 52. 45. Laid in 1:3 sanded gypsum mortar.
28. Minimum % of solid material in concrete units: 54. 46. Units of expanded slag or pumice aggregate.
29. Minimum % of solid material in concrete units: 55. 47. Units of crushed limestone, blast furnace slag, cinders, and expanded
clay or shale.
48. Units of calcareous sand and gravel. Coarse aggregate, 60% or more cal-
31. Minimum % of solid material in concrete units: 62. cite and dolomite.
32. Minimum % of solid material in concrete units: 65. 49. Units of siliceous sand and gravel. 90% or more quartz, chert, or flint.
33. Minimum % of solid material in concrete units: 70. 50. Unit minimum 49% solid.
34. Minimum % of solid material in concrete units: 76. 51. Unit minimum 62% solid.
35. Not less than 1/2" of 1:3 sanded gypsum plaster. 52. Unit minimum 65% solid.
36. Noncombustible or no members framed into wall. 53. Unit minimum 73% solid.
37. Combustible members framed into wall. 54. Ratings based on one unit and one cell in wall section.
38. One unit in wall thickness. 55. See Clay Tile Partition Design Construction drawings, below.
Note 55, Table 1.1.3. Designs of tiles used in The four types of construction used in fire-test partitions.
fire-test partitions.
A-22 Fire Ratings of Archaic Materials and Assemblies
Figure 1.1.4
Masonry Walls, 8" (200 mm) to less than 10" (250 mm) thick
Table 1.1.4
Masonry Walls, 8" (200 mm) to less than 10" (250 mm) thick
W-8-M-9 8" Core: clay or shale structural tile; See notes 1 hr 45 min - 1 - 1,2,6,9,18, 1 3/4
no facings 20,21
W-8-M-10 8" Core: clay or shale structural tile; See notes 45 min - 1 - 1,2,6,9,19, 3/4
no facings 20,21
W-8-M-11 8" Core: clay or shale structural tile; See notes 2 hrs - 1 - 1,2,6,10,18, 2
no facings 20,21
W-8-M-12 8" Core: clay or shale structural tile; See notes 45 min - 1 - 1,2,6,10,19, 3/4
no facings 20,21
W-8-M-13 8" Core: clay or shale structural tile; See notes 2 hrs 30 min - 1 - 1,3,6,12,18, 2 1/2
no facings 20,21
W-8-M-14 8" Core: clay or shale structural tile; See notes 1 hr - 1 - 1,2,6,12,19, 1
no facings 20,21
W-8-M-15 8" Core: clay or shale structural tile; See notes 3 hrs - 1 - 1,2,6,16,18, 3
no facings 20,21
W-8-M-16 8" Core: clay or shale structural tile; See notes 1 hr 15 min - 1 - 1,2,6,16,19, 1 1/4
no facings 20,21
W-8-M-17 8" Units in wall thickness: 1; cells in See notes 2 hrs 30 min - 1 - 1,44 2 1/2
wall thickness: 1; minimum % solids:
70; cored clay or shale brick; no facings
W-8-M-18 8" Cored clay or shale bricks; units in wall See notes 5 hrs - 1 - 1,45 5
thickness: 2; cells in wall thickness:
2; minimum % solids: 87; no facings
W-8-M-19 8" Core: solid clay or shale brick; no facings See notes 5 hrs - 1 - 1,22,45 5
W-8-M-20 8" Core: hollow rolok of clay or shale See notes 2 hrs 30 min - 1 - 1,22,45 2 1/2
W-8-M-21 8" Core: hollow rolok of clay or shale; See notes 4 hrs - 1 - 1,45 4
no facings
A-24 Fire Ratings of Archaic Materials and Assemblies
41. Concrete units made with expanded burned clay or shale, crushed lime-
42. Concrete units made with calcareous sand and gravel. Coarse aggregate,
43. Concrete units made with siliceous sand and gravel. 90% or more quartz,
Figure 1.1.5
Masonry Walls, 10" (250 mm) to less than 12" (300 mm) thick
Table 1.1.5
Masonry Walls, 10" (250 mm) to less than 12" (300 mm) thick
Masonry Walls, 10" to less than 12" thick 25. Failed by sudden collapse with no preceding signs of impending failure.
17. Not less than 5/8" thickness of 1:3 sanded gypsum plaster.
stone, air-cooled slag, or cinders.
Figure 1.1.6
Masonry Walls, 12" (300 mm) to less than 14" (350 mm) thick
Table 1.1.6
Masonry Walls 12" (300 mm) to less than 14" (350 mm) thick
17. Not less than 5/8" thickness of 1:3 sanded gypsum plaster.
34. Minimum % of solid material in concrete units: 62%.
42. Concrete units made with calcareous sand and gravel. Coarse aggregate,
Figure 1.1.7
Table 1.1.7
17. Not less than 5/8" thickness of 1:3 sanded gypsum plaster.
35. Minimum % of solid material in concrete units: 65%.
42. Concrete units made with calcareous sand and gravel. Coarse aggregate,
Figure 1.2.1
Metal Frame Walls, 0" (0 mm) to less than 4" (100 mm) thick
15
A-44 Fire Ratings of Archaic Materials and Assemblies
Table 1.2.1
Metal Frame Walls, 0" (0 mm) to less than 4" (100 mm) thick
Figure 1.2.2
Metal Frame Walls, 4" (100 mm) to less than 6" (150 mm) thick
Table 1.2.2
Metal Frame Walls, 4" (100 mm) to less than 6" (150 mm) thick
Table 1.2.3
Metal Frame Walls, 6" (150 mm) to less than 8" (200 mm) thick
TABLE 1.2.4
Metal Frame Walls, 8" (200 mm) to less than 10" (250 mm) thick
Table 1.3.1
Wood Frame Walls, 0" (0 mm) to less than 4" (100 mm) thick
Table 1.3.1Notes
Wood Frame Walls, 0" to less than 4" thick
1. Achieved "Grade C" fire resistance (British).
2. Nominal 2 x 4 wood studs of No. 1 Common or better lumber set edgewise,
2 x 4 plates at top and bottom and blocking at mid-height of wall.
3. All horizontal joints in facing material backed by 2 x 4 blocking in wall.
4. Load = 360 psi of net stud cross-sectional area.
5. Facings secured with 6 d casing nails. Nail holes predrilled and 0.02"0.03"
smaller than nail diameter.
6. The wood-wool core is a pressed excelsior slab which possesses insulating
properties similar to cellulosic insulation.
A-52 Fire Ratings of Archaic Materials and Assemblies
Figure 1.3.2
Wood Frame Walls, 4" (100 mm) to less than 6" (150 mm) thick
Table 1.3.2
Wood Frame Walls, 4" (100 mm) to less than 6" (150 mm) thick
Table 1.3.2Notes 31. Nominal 2" x 4" studs of yellow pine or Douglas fir spaced 16" on center
Wood Frame Walls, 4" (100 mm) to less than 6" (150 mm) thick in a single row.
1. All specimens 8' or 8'8" x 10'4"i.e., 1/2 of furnace size. See note 42 for
32. Studs as in note 31 except double row, with studs in rows staggered.
3. Test per ASANo. A-2-1934 except where unloaded. Also, panels were of
35. Wood laths were nailed with either 3 d or 4 d nails, one nail to each
"half" size of furnace opening. Time value signifies a thermal failure time.
bearing, and the end joining broken every 7th course.
4. 2" x 4" studs, 16" O.C.; where 10'4", blocking @ 2'4" height.
36. 1/2" thick fiberboard plaster base nailed with 3 d or 4 d common wire nails
10. Walls were tested beyond achievement of first test end point. A load
bearing time in excess of performance time indicates that although ther- 41. Mineral wool bats, 0.9 lb/ft 2 .
12. Hose stream test specimen. See table entry of similar design for recom- 18 ft. test furnace
mended rating.
17. Nominal 2" x 4" wood studs of No. 1 common or better lumber set edge-
wise. 2" x 4" plates at top and bottom and blocking at mid-height of wall.
18. Cavity insulation consists of rock wool bats 1.0 lb/ft2 of filled cavity area.
19. Cavity insulation consists of glass-wool bats 0.6 lb/ft 2 of filled cavity area.
20. Cavity insulation consists of blown-in forck wool 2.0 lb/ft2 of filled cavity
area.
21. Mix proportions for plastered walls as follows: first ratio indicates scratch
coat mix, weight of dry plaster to dry sand; second ratio indicates brown
coat mix.
25. Nominal 2" x 4" studs per note 17, spaced at 16" on center.
26. Horizontal joints in facing material supported by 2" x 4" blocking within
wall.
27. Facings secured with 6 d casing nails. Nail holes predrilled and were
28. Cavity insulation consists of mineral wool bats weighing 2 lb/ft2 of filled
cavity area.
G
29. Interior wall face exposed to fire.
Table 1.3.3
Wood Frame Walls, 6"(150 mm) to less than 8" (200 mm) thick
Table 1.3.3Notes
Wood Frame Walls,6"(150 mm) to less than 8" (200 mm) thick
1. Nominal 2 x 4 wood studs of No. 1 common or better lumber set edgewise.
2 x 4 plates at top and bottom and blocking at mid-height of wall.
2. Mix proportions for plastered walls as follows: first ratio indicates scratch
coat mix, weight of dry plaster to dry sand; second ratio indicates brown
coat mix.
3. Load = 360 psi of net stud cross-sectional area.
4. Nominal 2 x 4 studs of yellow pine or Douglas fir spaced 16" in a double
row, with studs in rows staggered.
5. Mineral wool bats, 0.19 lb/ft 2 .
A-62 Fire Ratings of Archaic Materials and Assemblies
Table 1.4.1
WallsMiscellaneous Materials, 0" (0 mm) to less than 4" (100 mm) thick
Table 1.4.1Notes
WallsMiscellaneous Materials, 0" to less than 4" thick
1. No failure reached at 1 hour.
2. These glass blocks are assumed to be solid based on other test data avail-
able for similar but hollow units that show significantly reduced fire
endurance.
3. Minimum of 1/2" of 1:3 sanded gypsum plaster required to develop this
rating.
Table 1.4.2
WallsMiscellaneous Materials, 4" (100 mm) to less than 6" (150 mm) thick
Table 1.4.2Notes
Miscellaneous Materials, 4" to less than 6" thick
1. 1/2" sanded gypsum plaster. Voids in hollow blocks to be not more
than 30%.
Appendix AFire Rating Tables A-63
Figure 1.5.1
Table 1.5.1
Table 1.5.1Notes
Finish RatingsInorganic Materials
1. The finish rating is the time required to obtain an average temperature rise
of 250F, or a single point rise of 325F, at the interface between the
material being rated and the substrate being protected.
2. Tested in accordance with the Standard Specifications for Fire Tests of
Building Construction and Materials, ASANo. A2-1932.
3. Mix proportions for plaster as follows: first ratio, dry weight of plaster to dry
weight of sand for scratch coat; second ratio, plaster to sand for brown
coat.
4. Neat plaster means unsanded wood-fiber gypsum plaster.
Appendix AFire Rating Tables A-65
Table 1.5.2
Table 1.5.2Notes
Finish RatingsOrganic Materials
1. The finish rating is the time required to obtain an average temperature rise
of 250F, or a single point rise of 325F, at the interface between the
material being rated and the substrate being protected.
2. Tested in accordance with the Standard Specifications for Fire Tests of
Building Construction and Materials, ASANo. A2-1932.
3. Plaster ratios as follows: first ratio is for scratch coat, weight of dry plaster
to weight of dry sand; second ratio is for the brown coat.
General Note
The finish rating of thinner materials, particularly thinner woods, have not
been listed because the possible effects of shrinkage, warpage, and
aging cannot be predicted.
A-66 Fire Ratings of Archaic Materials and Assemblies
Section IIColumns
Table 2.1.1
Table 2.1.1Notes
Reinforced Concrete Columns, Minimum Dimension 0" to less than 6"
1. Collapse.
2. British test.
Appendix AFire Rating Tables A-67
Figure 2.1.2
Minimum Dimension 10" (250 mm) to less than 12" (300 mm)
Table 2.1.2
Minimum Dimension 10" (250 mm) to less than 12" (300 mm)
Table 2.1.2, continued (Reinforced Concrete Columns, Minimum Dimension 10" to less than 12")
Item Min. Construction Details Performance Reference Number Notes Rec
Code Dimen. Load Time Pre Post- Hours
BMS BMS BMS
92 92
C-10-RC-4 10" 10" square columns; aggregate 46.5 tons 2 hrs - - 7 2, 7 2
concrete (5206 psi); reinforcement:
vertical four 1/2" rebars; horizontal
5/16" ties @ 6" pitch; cover 1"
C-10-RC-5 10" 10" square columns; aggregate 46.7 tons 2 hrs - - 7 1 2
concrete (5674 psi); reinforcement:
vertical four 1/2" rebars; horizontal
5/16" ties @ 6" pitch; cover 1"
C-10-RC-6 10" 10" square columns; aggregate 66 tons 1 hr 43 min - - 7 1 1 3/4
concrete (5150 psi); reinforcement:
vertical four 1 1/2" rebars; horizon -
tal 5/16" ties @ 6" pitch; cover 1"
C-10-RC-7 10" 10" square columns; aggregate 62.5 tons 1 hr 38 min - - 7 1 1 1/2
concrete (5580 psi); reinforcement:
vertical four 1/2" rebars; horizontal
5/16" ties @ 6" pitch; 1" cover
C-10-RC-8 10" 10" square columns; aggregate 72.8 tons 1 hr 48 min - - 7 1 1 3/4
concrete (4080 psi); reinforcement:
vertical four 1/8" rebars; horizontal
5/16" ties @ 6" pitch; 1 1/8" cover
C-10-RC-9 10" 10" square columns; aggregate 51 tons 2 hrs 16 min - - 7 1 2 1/4
concrete (2510 psi); reinforcement:
vertical four 1/2" rebars; horizontal
5/16" ties @ 6" pitch; cover 1"
C-10-RC-10 10" 10" square columns; aggregate 45 tons 2 hrs 14 min - - 7 12 2 1/4
concrete (2170 psi); reinforcement:
vertical four 1/2" rebars; horizontal
5/16" ties @ 6" pitch; cover 1"
C-10-RC-11 10" 10" square columns; gravel 46.5 tons 2 hrs 6 min - - 7 1 2
aggregate concrete (4015 psi); rein-
forcement: vertical four 1/2" rebars;
horizontal 5/16" ties @ 6" pitch;
cover 1"
C-11-RC-12 11" 11" square columns; gravel 61 tons 1 hr 23 min - - 7 1 1 1/4
aggregate concrete (4150 psi); rein-
forcement: vertical four 1 1/4"
rebars; horizontal 3/8" ties @ 7 1/2"
pitch, cover 1 1/2"
C-11-RC-13 11" 11" square columns; gravel aggregate 61 tons 1 hr 26 min - - 7 1 1 1/4
concrete (4380 psi); reinforcement:
vertical four 1 1/4" rebars; horizontal
3/8" ties @ 7 1/2" pitch; cover 1 1/2"
C-11-RC-14 11" 11" square columns; gravel aggregate 61 tons 3 hrs 9 min - - 7 1 3
concrete (4140 psi); reinforcement:
vertical four 1 1/4" rebars; horizon -
tal 3/8" ties @ 7 1/2" pitch; steel
mesh around reinforcement; cover
1 1/2"
Appendix AFire Rating Tables A-69
Table 2.1.2, continued (Reinforced Concrete Columns, Minimum Dimension 10" to less than 12")
Item Min. Construction Details Performance Reference Number Notes Rec
Code Dimen. Load Time Pre Post- Hours
BMS BMS BMS
92 92
C-11-RC-15 11" 11" square columns; slag aggregate 91 tons 2 hrs - - 7 25 2
concrete (3690 psi); reinforcement: ver-
tical four 1 1/4" rebars; horizontal 3/8"
ties @ 7 1/2" pitch; cover 1 1/2"
C-11-RC-16 11" 11" square columns; limestone aggregate 91.5 tons 3 hrs 41 min - - 7 1 3 1/2
concrete (5230 psi); reinforcement: ver-
tical four 1 1/4" rebars; horizontal 3/8"
ties @ 7 1/2" pitch; cover 1 1/2"
C-11-RC-17 11" 11" square columns; limestone aggregate 91.5 tons 3 hrs 47 min - - 7 1 3 1/2
concrete (5530 psi); reinforcement:
vertical four 1 1/4" rebars; horizontal
3/8" ties @ 7 1/2" pitch; cover 1 1/2"
C-11-RC-18 11" 11" square columns; limestone aggregate " 91.5 tons 2 hrs - - 7 24,6 2
concrete (5280 psi); reinforcement:
vertical four 1 1/4" rebars; horizon -
tal 3/8" ties @ 7 1/2" pitch; cover 1
1/2
C-11-RC-19 11" 11" square columns; limestone aggregate 71.4 tons 2 hrs - - 7 2,7 2
concrete (4180 psi); reinforcement:
vertical four 5/8" rebars; horizontal
3/8" ties @ 7" pitch; cover 1 1/2"
C-11-RC-20 11" 11" square columns; gravel concrete 58.8 tons 2 hrs - - 7 2,3,9 1 1/4
(4530 psi); reinforcement: vertical
four 5/8" rebars; horizontal 3/8" ties
@ 7" pitch; cover 1 1/2" with 1/2"
plaster
C-11-RC-21 11" 11" square columns; gravel concrete variable 1 hr 24 min - - 7 1,8 2
(3520 psi); reinforcement: vertical
four 5/8" rebars; horizontal 3/8" ties
@ 7" pitch; cover 1 1/2"
C-11-RC-22 11" 11" square columns; aggregate concrete 58.8 tons 2 hrs - - 7 2,3,10 2
(3710 psi); reinforcement: vertical
four 5/8" rebars; horizontal 3/8" ties
@ 7" pitch; cover 1 1/2"
C-11-RC-23 11" 11" square columns; aggregate concrete 58.8 tons 2 hrs - - 7 2,3,10 2
(3190 psi); reinforcement: vertical
four 5/8" rebars; horizontal 3/8" ties
@ 7" pitch; cover 1 1/2"
C-11-RC-24 11" 11" square columns; aggregate concrete 86.1 tons 1 hr 20 min - - 7 1 1 1/3
(4860 psi); reinforcement: vertical
four 5/8" rebars; horizontal 3/8" ties
@ 7" pitch; cover 1 1/2"
C-11-RC-25 11" 11" square columns; aggregate concrete 58.8 tons 1 hr 59 min - - 7 1 1 3/4
(4850 psi); reinforcement: vertical
four 5/8" rebars; horizontal 3/8" ties
@ 7" pitch; cover 1 1/2"
C-11-RC-26 11" 11" square columns, aggregate concrete 71.4 tons 53 min - - 7 1 3/4
(3834 psi); reinforcement: vertical
four 5/8" rebars; horizontal 5/16"
ties @ 4 1/2" pitch; cover 1 1/2"
A-70 Fire Ratings of Archaic Materials and Assemblies
Table 2.1.2Notes
Reinforced Concrete Columns, Minimum Dimension 10" to
less than 12"
1. Failure modecollapse.
2. Passed 2-hr fire exposure.
3. Passed hose stream test.
4. Reloaded effectively after 48 hours but collapsed at load in excess of origi-
nal test load.
5. Failing load was 150 tons.
6. Failing load was 112 tons.
7. Failed during hose stream test.
8. Range of load 58.8 tons (initial) to 92 tons (92 min.) to 60 tons (80 min.).
9. Collapsed at 44 tons in reload after 96 hours.
10. Withstood reload after 72 hours.
11. Collapsed on reload after 48 hours.
Table 2.1.3
Minimum Dimension 12" (300 mm) to less than 14" (350 mm)
Table 2.1.3Notes chert, and flint, if held in place with wire mesh or expanded metal having
Reinforced Concrete Columns, Minimum Dimension 12" to less than 14" not larger than 4-in. mesh, weighing not less than 1.7 lb/yd2 placed not
more than 1 in. from the surface of the concrete.
1. Failure modeunspecified structural.
Group IVincludes concrete having siliceous aggregates containing a
2. Group Iincludes concrete having calcareous aggregate containing a com-
combined total of 60 percent or more of quartz, chert, and flint, and tied
bined total of not more than 10 percent of quartz, chert, and flint for the
with No. 5 gauge steel wire wound spirally over the column section on a
coarse aggregate.
pitch of 8 in., or equivalent ties.
Group IIincludes concrete having trap-rock aggregate applied without 3. Groupings of aggregates and ties are the same as for structural steel
metal ties and also concrete having cinder, sandstone, or granite aggre- columns protected solidly with concrete, the ties to be placed over the
gate, if held in place with wire mesh or expanded metal having not larger vertical reinforcing bars and the mesh, where required, to be placed
than 4-in. mesh, weighing not less than 1.7 lb/yd2, placed not more than within 1 in. from the surface of the column.
1 in. from the surface of the concrete.
Column Aworking loads are assumed as carried by the area of the
Group IIIincludes concrete having cinder, sandstone, or granite aggre - column inside of the lines circumscribing the reinforcing steel.
gate tied with No. 5 gauge steel wire, wound spirally over the column sec-
tion on a pitch of 8 in., or equivalent ties, and concrete having siliceous Column Bworking loads are assumed as carried by the gross area of
aggregates containing a combined total of 60 percent or more of quartz, the column.
Table 2.1.4
Minimum Dimension 14" (350 mm) to less than 16" (400 mm)
Table 2.1.4Notes not larger than 4-in. mesh, weighing not less than 1.7 lb/yd2 placed not
Reinforced Concrete Columns, Minimum Dimension 14" to less than 16" more than 1 in. from the surface of the concrete.
1. Failure modemain rebars buckled between links at various points. Group IVincludes concrete having siliceous aggregates containing a
combined total of 60 percent or more of quartz, chert, and flint, and tied
2. Group Iincludes concrete having calcareous aggregate containing a com-
with No. 5 gauge steel wire wound spirally over the column section on a
bined total of not more than 10 percent of quartz, chert, and flint for the
pitch of 8 in., or equivalent ties.
coarse aggregate.
3. Groupings of aggregates and ties are the same as for structural steel
Group IIincludes concrete having trap-rock aggregate applied without columns protected solidly with concrete, the ties to be placed over the
metal ties and also concrete having cinder, sandstone, or granite aggre- vertical reinforcing bars and the mesh, where required, to be placed
gate, if held in place with wire mesh or expanded metal having not larger within 1 in. from the surface of the column.
than 4-in. mesh, weighing not less than 1.7 lb/yd2, placed not more than 1
in. from the surface of the concrete. Column Aworking loads are assumed as carried by the area of the
column inside of the lines circumscribing the reinforcing steel.
Group IIIincludes concrete having cinder, sandstone, or granite aggre -
gate tied with No. 5 gauge steel wire, wound spirally over the column sec- Column Bworking loads are assumed as carried by the gross area of
tion on a pitch of 8 in., or equivalent ties, and concrete having siliceous the column.
aggregates containing a combined total of 60 percent or more of quartz,
chert, and flint, if held in place with wire mesh or expanded metal having
Figure 2.1.5
Minimum Dimension 16" (400 mm) to less than 18" (450 mm)
Table 2.1.5
Minimum Dimension 16" (400 mm) to less than 18" (450 mm)
Table 2.1.5Notes, continued Group IVincludes concrete having siliceous aggregates containing a
Group IIincludes concrete having trap-rock aggregate applied without combined total of 60 percent or more of quartz, chert, and flint, and tied
metal ties and also concrete having cinder, sandstone, or granite aggre- with No. 5 gauge steel wire wound spirally over the column section on a
gate, if held in place with wire mesh or expanded metal having not larger pitch of 8 in., or equivalent ties.
than 4-in. mesh, weighing not less than 1.7 lb/yd2, placed not more than
9. Groupings of aggregates and ties are the same as for structural steel
1 in. from the surface of the concrete.
columns protected solidly with concrete, the ties to be placed over the
vertical reinforcing bars and the mesh, where required, to be placed
Group IIIincludes concrete having cinder, sandstone, or granite aggre -
within 1 in. from the surface of the column.
gate tied with No. 5 gauge steel wire, wound spirally over the column sec-
tion on a pitch of 8 in., or equivalent ties, and concrete having siliceous
Column Aworking loads are assumed as carried by the area of the col-
aggregates containing a combined total of 60 percent or more of quartz,
umn inside of the lines circumscribing the reinforcing steel.
chert, and flint, if held in place with wire mesh or expanded metal having
not larger than 4-in. mesh, weighing not less than 1.7 lb/yd2, placed not
Column Bworking loads are assumed as carried by the gross area of
more than 1 in. from the surface of the concrete.
the column.
Table 2.1.6
Minimum Dimension 18" (450 mm) to less than 20" (500 mm)
Table 2.1.6Notes not larger than 4-in. mesh, weighing not less than 1.7 lb/yd2, placed not
Reinforced Concrete Columns, Minimum Dimension 18" to less than 20" more than 1 in. from the surface of the concrete.
1. Group Iincludes concrete having calcareous aggregate containing a com- Group IVincludes concrete having siliceous aggregates containing a
bined total of not more than 10 percent of quartz, chert, and flint for the combined total of 60 percent or more of quartz, chert, and flint, and tied
coarse aggregate. with No. 5 gauge steel wire wound spirally over the column section on a
pitch of 8 in., or equivalent ties.
Group IIincludes concrete having trap-rock aggregate applied without
metal ties and also concrete having cinder, sandstone, or granite aggre- 2. Groupings of aggregates and ties are the same as for structural steel
gate, if held in place with wire mesh or expanded metal having not larger columns protected solidly with concrete, the ties to be placed over the
than 4-in. mesh, weighing not less than 1.7 lb/yd2, placed not more than vertical reinforcing bars and the mesh, where required, to be placed
1 in. from the surface of the concrete. within 1 in. from the surface of the column.
Group IIIincludes concrete having cinder, sandstone, or granite aggre - Column Aworking loads are assumed as carried by the area of the col-
gate tied with No. 5 gauge steel wire, wound spirally over the column sec- umn inside of the lines circumscribing the reinforcing steel.
tion on a pitch of 8 in., or equivalent ties, and concrete having siliceous
aggregates containing a combined total of 60 percent or more of quartz, Column Bworking loads are assumed as carried by the gross area of
chert, and flint, if held in place with wire mesh or expanded metal having the column.
Figure 2.1.7
Minimum Dimension 20" (500 mm) to less than 22" (550 mm)
Table 2.1.7
Minimum Dimension 20" (500 mm) to less than 22" (550 mm)
Table 2.1.7Notes tion on a pitch of 8 in., or equivalent ties, and concrete having siliceous
Reinforced Concrete Columns, Minimum Dimension 20" to less than 22" aggregates containing a combined total of 60 percent or more of quartz,
chert, and flint, if held in place with wire mesh or expanded metal having
1. Passed 2-hr fire test. not larger than 4-in. mesh, weighing not less than 1.7 lb/yd2, placed not
more than 1 in. from the surface of the concrete.
2. Passed hose stream test.
3. Failed during reload at 300 tons. Group IVincludes concrete having siliceous aggregates containing a
combined total of 60 percent or more of quartz, chert, and flint, and tied
4. Passed reload after 72 hours. with No. 5 gauge steel wire wound spirally over the column section on a
5. Failure modecollapse. pitch of 8 in., or equivalent ties.
6. Group Iincludes concrete having calcareous aggregate containing a com- 7. Groupings of aggregates and ties are the same as for structural steel
bined total of not more than 10 percent of quartz, chert, and flint for the columns protected solidly with concrete, the ties to be placed over the
coarse aggregate. vertical reinforcing bars and the mesh, where required, to be placed
within 1 in. from the surface of the column.
Group IIincludes concrete having trap-rock aggregate applied without
metal ties and also concrete having cinder, sandstone, or granite aggre- Column Aworking loads are assumed as carried by the area of the col-
gate, if held in place with wire mesh or expanded metal having not larger umn inside of the lines circumscribing the reinforcing steel.
than 4-in. mesh, weighing not less than 1.7 lb/yd 2, placed not more than
1 in. from the surface of the concrete. Column Bworking loads are assumed as carried by the gross area of
the column.
Group IIIincludes concrete having cinder, sandstone, or granite aggre -
gate tied with No. 5 gauge steel wire, wound spirally over the column sec-
Table 2.1.8
Minimum Dimension 12" (300 mm) to less than 14" (350 mm)
Table 2.1.8Notes
Hexagonal Reinforced Concrete Columns, Minimum Dimension 12" to
less than 14"
1. Failure modecollapse.
2. Test stopped at 1 hour.
A-78 Fire Ratings of Archaic Materials and Assemblies
Table 2.1.9
Minimum Dimension 14" (350 mm) to less than 16" (400 mm)
Table 2.1.9Notes
Hexagonal Reinforced Concrete Columns, Minimum Dimension 14" to
less than 16"
1. Withstood 2-hr fire test.
2. Withstood hose stream test.
3. Withstood reload after 48 hours.
Table 2.1.10
Table 2.1.10Notes
Hexagonal Reinforced Concrete Columns, Diameter16" to less than 18"
1. Failure modecollapse.
2. Failed on furnace removal.
Appendix AFire Rating Tables A-79
Table 2.1.11
Table 2.2
Figure 2.3
Table 2.3
C-SG-3 130 in. 2 2" solid blocks with wire mesh in - 2 hrs - 1 - - 2
horizontal joints, 1" mortar on
flange, reentrant space filled with
block and mortar
C-SG-7 300 in.2 4" solid blocks with wire mesh in - 4 hrs - 1 - - 4
horizontal joints, 1" mortar on
flange, reentrant space filled with
block and mortar
C-SG-9 85 in.2 2" solid blocks with cramps at - 2 hrs 30 min - 1 - - 2 1/2
horizontal joints, mortar on flange
only at horizontal joints, reentrant
space not filled
C-SG-11 95 in.2 3" hollow blocks with cramps at - 2 hrs 30 min - 1 - - 2 1/2
horizontal joints, mortar on flange
only at horizontal joints, reentrant
space not filled
Table 2.4
Table 2.4Notes
Timber Columns, Minimum Dimension
1. Minimum area: 120 in 2
2. Type of wood: Long leaf pine or Douglas fir.
Table 2.5.1.1
Table 2.5.1.1Notes
Steel ColumnsConcrete Encasements
Minimum Dimension less than 6"
1. Failure modecollapse.
Appendix AFire Rating Tables A-83
Table 2.5.1.2
Steel ColumnsConcrete Encasements 6" (150 mm) to less than 8" (200 mm) thick
Table 2.5.1.2Notes
Steel ColumnsConcrete Encasements 6" to less than 8" thick
1. Failure modecollapse.
A-84 Fire Ratings of Archaic Materials and Assemblies
Figure 2.5.1.3
Minimum Dimension 8" (200 mm) to less than 10" (250 mm)
Table 2.5.1.3
Minimum Dimension 8" (200 mm) to less than 10" (250 mm)
Table 2.5.1.3, continued (Steel ColumnsConcrete Encasements, Minimum Dimension 8 to less than 10)
Item Min. Construction Details Performance Reference Number Notes Rec
Code Dimen. Load Time Pre Post- Hours
BMS BMS BMS
92 92
C-8-SC-3 8" 8" x 10" concrete encased column; 90 tons 1 hr 58 min - - 7 1 1 3/4
8" x 6" x 35 lb H beam; protection:
aggregate concrete (3750 psi) with
4"16 SWG mesh, reinforcing 1/2"
below column surface
C-8-SC-4 8" 6" x 6" steel column with 2" outside - 5 hrs - 1 - 2 5
protection; Group I
C-8-SC-5 8" 6" x 6" steel column with 2" outside - 3 hrs 30 min - 1 - 2 3 1/2
protection; Group II
C-8-SC-6 8" 6" x 6" steel column with 2" outside - 2 hrs 30 min - 1 - 2 2 1/2
protection; Group III
C-8-SC-7 8" 6" x 6" steel column with 2" outside - 1 hr 45 min - 1 - 2 1 3/4
protection; Group IV
C-9-SC-8 9" 6" x 6" steel column with 3" outside - 7 hrs - 1 - 2 7
protection; Group I
C-9-SC-9 9" 6" x 6" steel column with 3" outside - 5 hrs - 1 - 2 5
protection; Group II
C-9-SC-10 9" 6" x 6" steel column with 3" outside - 3 hrs 30 min - 1 - 2 3 1/2
protection; Group III
C-9-SC-11 9" 6" x 6" steel column with 3" outside - 2 hrs 30 min - 1 - 2 2 1/2
protection; Group IV
Table 2.5.1.3Notes
Steel ColumnsConcrete Encasements
Minimum Dimension 8" to less than 10"
1. Failure modecollapse.
2. Group Iincludes concrete having calcareous aggregate containing a com-
bined total of not more than 10 percent of quartz, chert, and flint for the
coarse aggregate.
Figure 2.5.1.4
Steel ColumnsConcrete Encasements
Minimum Dimension 10 (250mm) to less than 12 (300 mm)
Table 2.5.1.4
Minimum Dimension 10" (250 mm) to less than 12" (300 mm)
Table 2.5.1.4, continued (Steel ColumnsConcrete Encasements, Minimum Dimension 10 to less than 12)
Item Min. Construction Details Performance Reference Number Notes Rec
Code Dimen. Load Time Pre Post- Hours
BMS BMS BMS
92 92
C-10-SC-3 10" Column: 10" x 12"; 8" x 6" x 35 lb 90 tons 3 hrs 17 min - - 7 2 3 1/4
H beam; protection: concrete of
crushed stone and sand (3930 psi)
6" x 4"13 SWG mesh; 1" below
column surface
C-10-SC-4 10" Column: 10" x 12"; 8" x 6" x 35 lb 90 tons 3 hrs 22 min - - 7 2 3 1/3
H beam; protection: Concrete of
crushed basalt and sand (4350 psi)
6" x 4" 13 SWG mesh; 1" below col-
umn surface
C-10-SC-5 10" Column: 10" x 12"; 8" x 6" x 35 lb 90 tons 3 hrs 39 min - - 7 2 3 1/2
H beam; protection: concrete gravel
aggregate (5570 psi) 6" x 4" mesh;
13 SWG
C-10-SC-6 10" Column: 10" x 16"; 8" x 6" x 35 lb 90 tons 4 hrs 32 min - - 7 2 4 1/2
I beam; protection: gravel concrete
(4950 psi) 6" x 4" mesh 13 SWG; 1"
below column surface
C-10-SC-7 10" 10" x 12" concrete encased steel 90 tons 2 hrs - - 7 3,4 2
column; 8"x 6" x 35 lb H beam; pro-
tection: aggregate concrete (1370
psi) with 6" x 4" mesh; 13 SWG
reinforcing 1" below column surface
C-10-SC-8 10" 10" x 12" concrete encased steel 86 tons 3 hrs 36 min - - 7 2 3 1/2
column; 8" x 6" x 35 lb H column; pro-
tection: aggregate concrete (4000 psi)
with 13 SWG iron wire loosely wound
around column @ 6" pitch about 2"
beneath column surface
C-10-SC-9 10" 10" x 12" concrete encased steel 86 tons 2 hrs 8 min - - 7 2 2
column; 8" x 6" x 35 lb H beam;
protection: aggregate concrete
(3290 psi; 2 cover minimum
C-10-SC-10 10" 10" x 14" concrete encased steel column; 90 tons 4 hrs 28 min - - 7 2 4 1/3
8" x 6" x 35 lb H column; protection:
crushed brick-filled concrete (5310 psi);
with 6" x 4" mesh; 13 SWG reinforce-
ment 1" beneath column surface
C-10-SC-11 10" 10" x 12" concrete encased column; 90 tons 1 hr 2 min - - 7 2 1
8" x 6" x 35 lb H beam; protection:
aggregate concrete (3420 psi) with
6" x 4" mesh; 13 SWG reinforce-
ments 1" below surface
C-10-SC-12 10" 10" x 12" concrete encased steel 90 tons 3 hrs 2 min - - 7 2 3
column; 8" x 6" x 35 lb H beam;
protection: aggregate concrete
(4480 psi) four 3/8" vertical rebars
@ H beam edges with 3/16" spac-
ers @ beam surface @ 3' pitch and
3/16" binders @ 10" pitch; 2" con-
crete cover
A-88 Fire Ratings of Archaic Materials and Assemblies
Table 2.5.1.4, continued (Steel ColumnsConcrete Encasements, Minimum Dimension 10 to less than 12)
Item Min. Construction Details Performance Reference Number Notes Rec
Code Dimen. Load Time Pre Post- Hours
BMS BMS BMS
92 92
C-10-SC-13 10" 10" x 12" concrete encased steel 90 tons 3 hrs 59 min - - 7 2 3 3/4
column; 8" x 6" x 35 lb H beam; protec-
tion: aggregate concrete (5070 psi) with
6" x 4" mesh; 13 SWG reinforcing @ 6"
beam sides wrapped and held by wire
ties across (open) 8" beam face; rein-
forcements wrapped in 6" x 4" mesh;
13 SWG throughout with 1/2" cover to
column surface
C-10-SC-14 10" 10" x 12" concrete encased steel 90 tons 2 hrs 50 min - - 7 2 2 3/4
column; 8" x 6" x 35 lb H column; pro-
tection: aggregate concrete (4410 psi)
6" x 4" mesh; 13 SWG reinforcement
1 1/4" below column surface; 1/2" lime-
cement plaster with 3/8" gypsum plaster
finish
C-10-SC-15 10" 10" x 12" concrete encased steel 90 tons 3 hrs 54 min - - 7 2 3 3/4
column; 8" x 6" x 35 lb H beam;
protection: crushed clay brick-filled
concrete (4260 psi) with 6" x 4"
mesh; 13 SWG reinforcing 1" below
column surface
C-10-SC-16 10" 10" x 12" concrete encased steel 90 tons 3 hrs 54 min - - 7 2 3 3/4
columns; 8" x 6" x 35 lb H beam; pro-
tection: limestone aggregate concrete
(4350 psi) 6" x 4" mesh; 13 SWG rein-
forcing 1" below column surface
C-10-SC-17 10" 10" x 12" concrete encased steel 90 tons 3 hrs - - 7 4,5 3
column; 8" x 6" x 35 lb H beam; protec-
tion: limestone aggregate concrete
(5300 psi) with 6" x 4"; 13 SWG wire
mesh 1" below column surface
C-10-SC-18 10" 10" x 12" concrete encased steel 90 tons 3 hrs - - 7 4,5 3
column; 8" x 6" x 35 lb H beam; protec-
tion: limestone aggregate concrete
(4800 psi) with 6" x 4"; 13 SWG mesh
reinforcement 1" below surface
C-10-SC-19 10" 10" x 14" concrete encased steel 118 tons 2 hrs 42 min - - 7 2 2
column; 12" x 8" x 65 lb H beam; pro-
tection: aggregate concrete (3900 psi)
4" mesh; 16 SWG reinforcing 1/2"
below column surface
C-10-SC-20 10" 10" x 14" concrete encased steel 177 tons 2 hrs 8 min - - 7 2 2
column; 12" x 8" x 65 lb H beam; pro-
tection: aggregate concrete (4930 psi);
4" mesh; 16 SWG reinforcing 1/2"
below column surface
Appendix AFire Rating Tables A-89
Table 2.5.1.4, continued (Steel ColumnsConcrete Encasements, Minimum Dimension 10 to less than 12)
Item Min. Construction Details Performance Reference Number Notes Rec
Code Dimen. Load Time Pre Post- Hours
BMS BMS BMS
92 92
C-10-SC-21 10 3/8" 10 3/8" x 12 3/8" concrete encased 90 tons 2 hrs - - 7 3,4 2
steel column; 8" x 6" x 35 lb H
beam; protection: aggregate con-
crete (835 psi) with 6" x 4" mesh;
13 SWG reinforcing 1 3/16" below
column surface; 3/16" gypsum plas-
ter finish
C-11-SC-22 11" 11" x 13" concrete encased steel 90 tons 3 hrs - - 7 6,7 3
column; 8" x 6" x 35 lb H beam;
protection: "open texture" brick-filled
concrete (890 psi) with 6" x 4"
mesh; 13 SWG reinforcing 1 1/2"
below column surface; 3/8" lime
cement plaster; 1/8" gypsum plaster
finish
C-11-SC-23 11" 11" x 12" column; 4" x 3" x 10 lb 12 tons 6 hrs - - 7 7,8 6
H beam; gravel concrete (4550 psi);
6" x 4"13 SWG mesh reinforcing;
1" below column surface
C-11-SC-24 11" 11" x 12" column; 4" x 3" 10 lb 16 tons 5 hrs 32 min - 7 2 51/2
H beam; protection: gravel aggre-
gate concrete (3830 psi) with 4" x
4" mesh; 16 SWG; 1" below column
surface
C-10-SC-25 10" 6" x 6" steel column with 4" outside - 9 hrs - 1 - 9 9
protection; Group I
C-10-SC-26 10" Description as per C-10-SC-25; - 7 hrs - 1 - 9 7
Group II
C-10-SC-27 10" Description as per C-10-SC-25; - 5 hrs - 1 - 9 5
Group III
C-10-SC-28 10" Description as per C-10-SC-25; - 3 hrs 30 min - 1 - 9 3 1/2
Group IV
C-10-SC-29 10" 8" x 8" steel column with 2" outside - 6 hrs - 1 - 9 6
protection; Group I
C-10-SC-30 10" Description as per C-10-SC-29; Group II - 4 hrs - 1 - 9 4
C-10-SC-31 10" Description as per C-10-SC-29; Group III - 3 hrs - 1 - 9 3
C-10-SC-32 10" Description as per C-10-SC-29; Group IV - 2 hrs - 1 - 9 2
C-11-SC-33 11" 8" x 8" steel column with 3" outside - 8 hrs - 1 - 9 8
protection; Group I
C-11-SC-34 11" Description as per C-11-SC-33; Group II - 6 hrs - 1 - 9 6
C-11-SC-35 11" Description as per C-11-SC-33; Group III - 4 hrs - 1 - 9 4
C-11-SC-36 11" Description as per C-11-SC-33; Group IV - 3 hrs - 1 - 9 3
A-90 Fire Ratings of Archaic Materials and Assemblies
Table 2.5.1.4Notes
Steel ColumnsConcrete Encasements, Minimum Dimension 10" to Group IIincludes concrete having trap-rock aggregate applied without
less than 12" metal ties and also concrete having cinder, sandstone, or granite aggre-
gate, if held in place with wire mesh or expanded metal having not larger
1. Tested under total restraint load to prevent expansionminimum load than 4-in. mesh, weighing not less than 1.7 lb/yd2, placed not more than
90 tons. 1 in. from the surface of the concrete.
2. Failure modecollapse.
Group IIIincludes concrete having cinder, sandstone, or granite aggre -
3. Passed 2-hr fire test (Grade "C"British). gate tied with No. 5 gauge steel wire, wound spirally over the column sec-
tion on a pitch of 8 in., or equivalent ties, and concrete having siliceous
4. Passed hose stream test. aggregates containing a combined total of 60 percent or more of quartz,
5. Column tested and passed 3-hr grade fire resistance (British). chert, and flint, if held in place with wire mesh or expanded metal having
not larger than 4-in. mesh, weighing not less than 1.7 lb/yd2, placed not
6. Column passed 3-hr fire test. more than 1 in. from the surface of the concrete.
7. Column collapsed during hose stream testing. Group IVincludes concrete having siliceous aggregate containing a
8. Column passed 6-hr fire test. combined total of 60 percent or more of quartz, chert, and flint, and tied
with No. 5 gauge steel wire wound spirally over the column section on a
9. Group Iincludes concrete having calcareous aggregate containing a com- pitch of 8 in., or equivalent ties.
bined total of not more than 10 percent of quartz, chert, and flint for the
coarse aggregate.
Figure 2.5.1.5
Table 2.5.1.5
Minimum Dimension 12" (300 mm) to less than 14" (350 mm)
Table2.5.1.5, continued (Steel ColumnsConcrete Encasements, Minimum Dimension 12 to less than 14))
Item Min. Construction Details Performance Reference Number Notes Rec
Code Dimen. Load Time Pre Post- Hours
BMS BMS BMS
92 92
C-13-SC-15 13" Description as per C-13-SC-14; Group II - 7 hrs - 1 - 2 7
C-13-SC-16 13" Description as per C-13-SC-14; Group III - 5 hrs - 1 - 2 5
C-13-SC-17 13" Description as per C-13-SC-14; Group IV - 3 hrs 30 min - 1 - 2 3 1/2
Table 2.5.1.5Notes
Steel ColumnsConcrete Encasements
Minimum Dimension 12" to less than 14"
1. Failure modecollapse.
2. Group Iincludes concrete having calcareous aggregate containing a
combined total of not more than 10 percent of quartz, chert, and flint for
the coarse aggregate.
Figure 2.5.1.6
Table 2.5.1.6
Minimum Dimension 14" (250 mm) to less than 16" (400 mm)
Table 2.5.1.6, continued (Steel ColumnsConcrete Encasements, Minimum Dimension 14 to less than 16)
Item Min. Construction Details Performance Reference Number Notes Rec
Code Dimen. Load Time Pre Post- Hours
BMS BMS BMS
92 92
C-14-SC-4 14" Description as per C-14-SC-3; - 9 hrs - 1 - 2 9
Group II
C-14-SC-5 14" Description as per C-14-SC-3; - 7 hrs - 1 - 2 7
Group III
C-14-SC-6 14" Description as per C-14-SC-3; - 5 hrs - 1 - 2 5
Group IV
C-14-SC-7 14" 12" x 12" steel column with 2" - 8 hrs - 1 - 2 8
outside protection; Group I
C-14-SC-8 14" Description as per C-14-SC-7; - 6 hrs - 1 - 2 6
Group II
C-14-SC-9 14" Description as per C-14-SC-7; - 5 hrs - 1 - 2 5
Group III
C-14-SC-10 14" Description as per C-14-SC-7; - 3 hrs - 1 - 2 3
Group IV
C-15-SC-11 15" 12" x 12" steel column with 3" - 11 hrs - 1 - 2 11
outside protection; Group I
C-15-SC-12 15" Description as per C-15-SC-11; - 8 hrs - 1 - 2 8
Group II
C-15-SC-13 15" Description as per C-15-SC-11; - 6 hrs - 1 - 2 6
Group III
C-15-SC-14 15" Description as per C-15-SC-11; - 4 hrs - 1 - 2 4
Group IV
Table 2.5.1.6Notes
Steel ColumnsConcrete Encasements
Minimum Dimension 14" to less than 16"
1. Collapse.
2. Group Iincludes concrete having calcareous aggregate containing a
combined total of not more than 10 percent of quartz, chert, and flint for
the coarse aggregate.
Table 2.5.1.7
Minimum Dimension 16" (400 mm) to less than 18" (450 mm)
Table 2.5.1.7Notes
Steel ColumnsConcrete Encasements
Minimum Dimension 16" to less than 18"
1. Group Iincludes concrete having calcareous aggregate containing a com-
bined total of not more than 10 percent of quartz, chert, and flint for the
coarse aggregate.
Table 2.5.2.1
Minimum Dimension 10" (250 mm) to less than 12" (300 mm)
Table 2.5.2.1Notes
Steel ColumnsBrick and Block Encasements
Minimum Dimension 10" to less than 12"
1. Failure modecollapse.
2. Passed 2-hr fire test (Grade "C"British).
3. Passed hose stream test.
4. Passed reload test.
5. Passed 2-hr fire exposure but collapsed immediately following hose
stream test.
Appendix AFire Rating Tables A-97
Table 2.5.2.2
Minimum Dimension 12" (300 mm) to less than 14" (350 mm)
Table 2.5.2.2Notes
Steel ColumnsBrick and Block Encasements, Minimum Dimension
12" to less than 14"
1. Failure modecollapse.
Table 2.5.2.3
Minimum Dimension 14" (350 mm) to less than 16" (400 mm)
Table 2.5.3.1
Minimum Dimension 6" (150 mm) to less than 8" (200 mm)
Table 2.5.3.1Notes
Steel ColumnsPlaster Encasements
Minimum Dimension, 6" to less than 8"
1. Failure modecollapse.
Appendix AFire Rating Tables A-99
Table 2.5.3.2
Minimum Dimension 8" (200 mm) to less than 10" (250 mm)
Table 2.5.3.2Notes
Steel Columns - Plaster Encasements
Minimum Dimension, 8" to less than 10"
1. Failure modecollapse.
2. Passed 2-hr fire exposure test (Grade "C"British).
3. Passed hose stream test.
4. Passed reload test.
A-100 Fire Ratings of Archaic Materials and Assemblies
Table 2.5.4.1
Minimum Dimension 6" (150 mm) to less than 8" (200 mm)
Table 2.5.4.1Notes
Steel ColumnsMiscellaneous Encasements
Minimum Dimension 6" to less than 8"
1. Failure modecollapse.
Table 2.5.4.2
Minimum Dimension 8" (200 mm) to less than 10" (250 mm)
Table 2.5.4.2Notes
Steel ColumnsMiscellaneous Encasement
Minimum Dimension 8" to less than 10"
1. Passed 2-hr fire exposure test.
2. Collapsed during hose stream test.
Appendix AFire Rating Tables A-101
Table 2.5.4.3
Minimum Dimension 10" (250 mm) to less than 12" (300 mm)
Table 2.5.4.3Notes
Steel ColumnsMiscellaneous Encasements
Minimum Dimension 10" to less than 12"
1. Passed 2-hr fire exposure test (Grade "C"British).
2. Passed hose stream test.
3. Passed reload test.
4. Passed 4-hr fire exposure test.
Table 2.5.4.4
Minimum Dimension 12" (300 mm) to less than 14" (350 mm)
Table 2.5.4.4Notes
Steel ColumnsMiscellaneous Encasements
Minimum Dimension 12" to less than 14"
1. Passed 4-hr fire exposure (Grade "B"British).
2. Passed hose stream test.
3. Passed reload test.
A-102 Fire Ratings of Archaic Materials and Assemblies
Figure 3.1
RC
Table 3.1
Table 3.1Notes
Floor/Ceiling AssembliesReinforced Concrete
1. British test.
2. Failure modelocal back face temperature rise.
3. Tested for grade "C" (2 hr) fire resistance.
4. Collapse imminent following hose stream.
5. Failure mode: flame-thru.
6. Void formed with explosive force and report.
7. Achieved grade "B" (4 hr) fire resistance (British).
8. Failure modecollapse.
9. Test was run to 2 hrs, but specimen was partially supported by the furnace
Note 15, Table 3.1
at 1 1/4 hrs
10. Failure mode: average back face temperature.
11. Recommended endurance is for non-load-bearing performance only.
12. Floor maintained load-bearing ability to 2 hrs at which point test was
terminated.
13. Test was run to 3 hrs at which time failure mode 2 (above) was reached in
spite of crack formation at 29 min.
14. Tested for grade "A" (6 hr) fire resistance.
15. See drawing.
16. Load unspecified.
17. Total assembly thickness 5 1/2". Three-inch thick-blocks of molded excel-
sior bonded with portland cement used as inserts with 2 1/2" cover (con-
crete) above blocks and 3/4" gypsum plaster below. Nine-inch-wide ribs
containing reinforcing steel of unspecified size interrupted 20" wide seg-
ments of slab composite (i.e., plaster, excelsior blocks, concrete cover).
A-108 Fire Ratings of Archaic Materials and Assemblies
Figure 3.2
Table 3.2
Table 3.2Notes
Floor/Ceiling AssembliesSteel Structural Elements
1. No protective membrane over structural steel.
2. Performance time indicates first end point reached; only several tests were
continued to points where other failures occurred.
3. Load failure.
4. Thermal failure.
5. This is an estimated time to load bearing failure. The same joist and deck
specimen was used for a later test with different membrane protection.
6. Test stopped at 3 hr to reuse specimen; no end point reached.
7. Test stopped at 1 hr to reuse specimen; no end point reached.
8. All plaster used = gypsum.
9. Specimen size18' x 13 1/2'. Floor deck base material1/4" x 18' steel
plate welded to I beam.
10. I beams24" O.C.
11. I beams48" O.C.
12. Apply to open web joints, pressed steel joists, or rolled steel beams, which
are not stressed beyond 18,000 lb/in 2 in flexure for open-web pressed, or
light rolled steel joists and 20,000 lb/in2 for American standard or heavier
rolled beams.
13. Ratio of weight of portland cement to fine and coarse aggregates com-
bined for floor slabs shall not be less than 1:6 1/2.
14. Plaster for ceiling shall be applied on metal lath that shall be tied to sup-
ports to give the equivalent of single No. 18 gauge steel wires 5" O.C.
15. Load: maximum fiber stress in steel not to exceed 16,000 psi.
16. Prefabricated units 2 ft. wide with length equal to the span, composed of 2
pieces of No. 18 gauge formed steel welded together to give 4 longitudi-
nal cells.
17. Depth not less than 3" and distance between cells not less than 2".
18. Ceiling: metal lath tied to furring channels secured to runner channels
hung from cellular steel.
19. Load: rolled steel supporting beams and steel plate base shall not be
stressed beyond 20,000 psi in flexure. Formed steel (with wide upper
flange) construction shall not be stressed beyond 16,000 psi.
20. Some type of expanded metal or woven wire shall be imbedded to pre-
vent cracking in concrete flooring.
21. Ceiling plaster shall be on metal lath wired to rods or channels that are
clipped or welded to steel construction. Lath shall be no smaller than 18
gauge steel wire and not more than 7" O.C.
22. The securing rods or channels shall be at least as effective as single
3/16" rods with 1" of their length bent over the lower flanges of beams
with the rods or channels tied to this clip with 14 gauge iron wire.
Fire Ratings of Archaic Materials and Assemblies A-115
Figure 3.3
Table 3.3
Table 3.3Notes 11. Joist failure17 min., flame thru20 min., collapse43 min.
Floor/Ceiling AssembliesWood Joist 12. Joists: 2" x 10" southern pine or Douglas fir; No. 1 common or better; sub-
1. Thickness indicates thickness of first membrane protection on ceiling sur- floor: 3/4" wood sheathing diaphragm of asbestos paper, and finish of
face. tongue and grove wood flooring.
2. Failure modeflame thru. 13. Loadings: not more than 1000 psi maximum fiber stress in joists.
3. Failure modecollapse. 14. Perforations in gypsum lath are to be not less than 3/4" diameter with one
perforation for not more than 16/in 2 diameter.
4. No end point reached at termination of test.
15. "Distemper" is a British term for a water-based paint such as whitewash or
5. Failure imminenttest terminated. calcimine.
6. Joist failure11 1/2 min., flame thru13 min., collapse24 min.
7. Joist failure17 min., flame thru18 min., collapse33 min.
8. Joist failure18 min., flame thru8 min., collapse30 min.
9. Joist failure12 min., flame thru8 min., collapse22 min.
10. Joist failure11 min., flame thru17 min., collapse27 min.
A-120 Fire Ratings of Archaic Materials and Assemblies
Figure 3.4
Table 3.4
Table 3.4, continued (Floor/Ceiling AssembliesHollow Clay Tile with Reinforced Concrete)
Item Assemb. Construction Details Performance Reference Number Notes Rec
Code Thick- Load Time Pre Post- Hours
ness BMS BMS BMS
92 92
F/C-HT-4 6" Cover: 1 1/2" concrete (6280 psi); 115 psf 2 hrs 23 min. - - 7 1,3,7 2 1/3
3 cell hollow clay tiles 12" x 12" x 4";
3 1/4" concrete between tiles including
21/2" rebars with 3/4" concrete cover;
1/2" plaster cover, lower
F/C-HT-5 6" Cover: 1 1/2" concrete (6470 psi); 122 psf 2 hrs - - 7 1,3,5,8 2
three-cell hollow clay tiles 12" x 12" x
4"; 3 1/4" concrete between tiles includ-
ing 21/2" rebars with
1/2" cover; 1/2" plaster cover, lower
F/C-HT-6 8" Floor cover: 1 1/2" gravel cement 165 psf 4 hrs - - 7 1,3,9,10 4
(4300 psi); tiles: three-cell 12" x 12" x
6"; 3 1/2" space between tiles including
21/2" rebars with 1" cover from con-
crete bottom; 1/2" plaster cover, lower
F/C-HT-7 9" (nom) Deck: 7/8" T&G on 2" x 1 1/2" 95 psf 2 hrs 26 min - - 7 4,11,12,13 2 1/3
bottoms (18" O.C.) 1 1/2" concrete
cover (4600 psi); 3 cell hollow clay tiles
12" x 12" x 4"; 3" concrete between tiles
including 13/4" rebar 3/4" from tile
bottom; 1/2" plaster cover
F/C-HT-8 9" (nom) Deck: 7/8" T&G on 2" x 1 1/2" 95 psf 3 hrs 28 min - - 7 4,11,12,13 -
bottoms (18" O.C.) 1 1/2" concrete
cover with 3850 psi; 3 cell hollow clay
tiles 12" x 12" x 4"; 3" concrete between
tiles including 13/4" rebar 3/4" from
tile bottoms; 1/2" plaster cover
F/C-HT-9 9" (nom) Deck: 7/8" T&G on 2" x 1 1/2" bottoms 95 psf 2 hrs 14 min - - 7 3,5,8,11 -
(18" O.C.) 1 1/2" concrete cover
(4200 psi); 3 cell hollow clay tiles
12" x 12" x 4"; 3" concrete between tiles
including 13/4" rebar 3/4" from tile
bottoms; 1/2" plaster cover
F/C-HT-10 5 1/2" Fire clay tile (4" thick); 1 1/2" concrete See note 14 1 hr - - 43 15 1
cover; for general details see note 15
F/C-HT-11 8" Fire clay tile (6" thick); 2" cover See note 14 1 hr - - 43 15 1
F/C-HT-12 5 1/2" Fire clay tile (4" thick); 1 1/2" cover; See note 14 1 hr 30 min - - 43 15 1 1/2
5/8" gypsum plaster, lower
F/C-HT-13 8" Fire clay tile (6" thick); 2" cover; 5/8" See note 14 2 hrs - - 43 15 1 1/2
gypsum plaster, lower
A-122 Fire Ratings of Archaic Materials and Assemblies
4. Failure modecollapse. 13. Concrete in item 7 is P.C.-based but with crushed brick aggregates, while
in item 8 river sand and river gravels are used with the P.C.
5. Test stopped before any end points were reached.
14. Loadunspecified.
6. A generalized cross section of this floor type follows. See figure below.
15. The 12" x 12" fire-clay tiles were laid end to end in rows spaced 2 1/2" or
7. Failure modethermal; back face temperature rise. 4" apart. The reinforcing steel was placed between these rows and the
concrete cast around them and over the tile to form the structural floor.
8. Passed hose stream test.
SECTION IVBeams
Table 4.1.1
Table 4.1.2
Table 4.1.2Notes
Reinforced Concrete Beams, depth 12" to less than 14"
1. Qualified for 2-hr use. (Grade "C"British) test included hose stream and
reload at 48 hours.
2. Load concentrated at mid-span.
3. British test.
4. British testqualified for 6-hr use (Grade "A").
5. See figure below.
6. See figure below.
7. See figure below.
8. See Table 4.1.3, Note 5. Note 7, Table 4.1.2
Table 4.1.3
Table 4.1.3Notes "Restraint may be provided by the lateral stiffness of supports for
Reinforced Concrete Beams, depth 14" to less than 16" floor and roof assemblies and intermediate beams forming part of
the assembly. In order to develop restraint, connections must
1.Load concentrated at mid-span. adequately transfer thermal thrusts to such supports. The rigidity
of adjoining panels or structures shall be considered in assessing
2.Achieved 6-hr fire rating (Class "A"British).
the capabilities of a structure to resist thermal expansion."
3. See Figure.
Because it is difficult to determine whether an existing building's structural
4. See Figure. system is capable of providing the required restraint, the lower hourly
ratings of a similar, but unrestrained assembly have been recommended.
5. Section 43.147 of the 1979 Edition of the Uniform Building Code Standards
provides: 6.Hourly rating based upon Table 4.1.2, Item B-12-RC-2.
Table 4.2.1
Table 4.2.1Notes
Reinforced Concrete BeamsUnprotected, depth 10" to less than 12"
1. Concentrated at mid-span.
A-130 Fire Ratings of Archaic Materials and Assemblies
Table 4.2.2
Table 4.2.2Notes
Steel BeamsConcrete Protection, depth 10" to less than 12"
1. Load concentrated at mid-span.
2. Specimen 10'3" clear span simply supported.
3. Passed Grade "C" fire resistance (British) including hose stream and
reload.
4. Specimen 11' clear spanrestrained.
5. Passed Grade "B" fire resistance (British) including hose stream and
reload.
6. See Table 4.1.3, Note 5.
7. Hourly rating based upon B-SC-1 above.
Fire Ratings of Archaic Materials and Assemblies A-131
SECTION VDOORS
Figure 5.1
42
Table 5.1
Table 5.1Notes 11. The doors reported in these tests represent the type contemporaries used
Resistance of Doors to Fire Exposure as 20-minute solid core wood doors. The test results demonstrate the
necessity of having wall anchored metal frames, minimum cleaners possi-
1. All door frames were of standard lumber construction. ble between door, frame, and stops. They also indicate the utility of long
throw latches and the possible use of intumescent paints to seal doors to
2. Wood door stop protected by asbestos millboard.
frames in event of a fire.
3. Wood door stop protected by sheet metal.
12. Minimum working clearance and good latch closure are absolute necessi-
4. Door frame protected with sheet metal and weather strip. ties for effective containment for all such working door assemblies.
The fire resistance data is based This material is used with the
on tests performed in accor- permission of English Heritage,
dance with British Standard 476, 23 Savile Row, London W1X 1AB,
Fire Tests on Building Materials www.english_heritage.org.
and Structures. The actual fire
resistance of each door treat-
ment will vary with the doors
condition, the quality of its con-
struction, and the hardware
used. See Section 2.3 for addi-
tional information.
Excerpted from English Heritage Technical Guidance Note, Timber Paneled Doors and Fire
Excerpted from English Heritage Technical Guidance Note, Timber Paneled Doors and Fire
Excerpted from English Heritage Technical Guidance Note, Timber Paneled Doors and Fire
Excerpted from English Heritage Technical Guidance Note, Timber Paneled Doors and Fire
Excerpted from English Heritage Technical Guidance Note, Timber Paneled Doors and Fire
Excerpted from English Heritage Technical Guidance Note, Timber Paneled Doors and Fire
Excerpted from English Heritage Technical Guidance Note, Timber Paneled Doors and Fire
Appendix CBibliography
1. Central Housing Committee Structures, Report BMS 151, Buildings or Structures, New
on Research, Design, and National Bureau of Standards, York, 1949.
Construction; Subcommittee Washington, Nov. 1957.
11. Department of Scientific and
on Fire Resistance Classifica-
6. Shoub, H., and Ingberg, S. H., Industrial Research and of the
tions, "Fire-Resistance Classi-
"Fire Resistance of Steel Deck Fire Offices' Committee, Joint
fications of Building Con-
Floor Assemblies, Building Committee of the Building
structions, Building Materials
Science Series, 11, National Research Board, "Fire Grad-
and Structures, Report BMS
Bureau of Standards, Wash- ings of Buildings, Part I.
92, National Bureau of Stan-
ington, Dec. 1967. General Principles and
dards, Washington, Oct. 1942.
Structural Precautions," Post-
(Available from NTIS No. 7. Davey, N., and Ashton, L. A.,
War Building Studies, No. 20,
COM-73-10974) "Investigations on Building
Ministry of Works, London,
Fires, Part V: Fire Tests of
2. Foster, H. D., Pinkston, E. R., 1946.
Structural Elements," National
and Ingberg, S. H., "Fire
Building Studies, Research 12. Lawson, D. I., Webster, C. T.,
Resistance of Structural Clay
Paper, No. 12, Dept. of and Ashton, L. A., "Fire
Tile Partitions, Building
Scientific and Industrial Enduranceof Timber Beams
Materials and Structures,
Research (Building Research and Floors," National Building
Report BMS 113, National
Station), London, 1953. Studies, Bulletin, No. 13, Dept.
Bureau of Standards,
of Scientific and Industrial
Washington, Oct. 1948. 8. National Board of Fire
Research and Fire Offices'
Underwriters, Fire Resistance
3. Ryan, J. V., and Bender, E. W., Committee (Joint Fire Re-
Ratings of Beam, Girder, and
"Fire Endurance of Open Web search Organization), London,
Truss Protections, Ceiling
Steel-Joist Floors with Con- 1951.
Constructions, Column Pro-
crete Slabs and Gypsum
tections, Floor and Ceiling 13. Parker, T. W., Nurse, R. W.,
Ceilings, Building Materials
Constructions, Roof Construc- and Bessey, G. E., "Investi-
and Structures, Report BMS
tions, Walls and Partitions, gations on Building Fires, Part
141, National Bureau of
New York, April 1959. I: The Estimation of the Max-
Standards, Washington, Aug.
imum Temperature Attained
1954. 9. Mitchell, N. D., Bender, E. D.,
in Building Fires from Exam-
and Ryan, J. V., "Fire Resis-
4. Mitchell, N. D., "Fire Tests of ination of the Debris, and
tance of Shutters for Moving-
Wood-Framed Walls and Part II: The Visible Change in
Stairway Openings," Building
Partitions with Asbestos- Concrete or Mortar Exposed
Materials and Structures,
Cement Facings, Building to High Temperatures,"
Report BMS 129, National
Materials and Structures, National Building Studies,
Bureau of Standards, Wash-
Report BMS 123, National Technical Paper, No. 4, Dept.
ington, March 1952.
Bureau of Standards, of Scien-tific and Industrial
Washington, May 1951. 10. National Board of Fire Research (Building Research
Underwriters, National Station), London, 1950.
5. Robinson, H. E., Cosgrove, L.A.,
Building Code: An Ordinance
and Powell, F. J., "Thermal 14. Bevan, R. C., and Webster,
Providing for Fire Limits, and
Resistance of Airspace and C. T., "Investigations on
Regulations Governing the
Fibrous Insulations Bounded Building Fires, Part III:
Construction, Alteration,
by Reflective Surfaces, Radiation from Building
Equipment, or Removal of
Building Materials and Fires," National Building
C-2 Fire Ratings of Archaic Materials and Assemblies
Studies, Technical Paper, No. 21. Kidder, F. E., Building Committee, No. VII, London,
5, Dept. of Scientific and Construction and Superinten- 1912.
Industrial Research (Building dence, rev. and enl., by T.
28. Egan, M. D., Concepts in
Research Station), London, Nolan, W. T. Comstock, New
Building Firesafety, J. Wiley,
1950. York, 19091913, 2 vols.
New York, 1978.
15. Webster, D. J., and Ashton, 22. National Fire Protection
29. Sachs, E. O., and Marsland,
L. A., "Investigations on Association, Committee on
E., "The Fire Resistance of
Building Fires, Part IV: Fire Fire Resistive Construction,
Floors being Tabulated:
Resistance of Timber Doors," The Baltimore Conflagration,
Results of Fire Tests Conduc-
National Building Studies, 2nd ed., Chicago, 1904.
ted by the Committee,"
Technical Paper, No. 6, Dept.
23. Przetak, L., Standard Details Journal of the British Fire
of Scientific and Industrial
for Fire-Resistive Building Prevention Committee, No. VI,
Research (Building Research
Construction, McGraw-Hill London, 1911.
Station), London, 1951.
Book Co., New York, 1977.
30. Sachs, E. O., and Marsland,
16. Kidder, F. E., Architects' and
24. Hird, D., and Fischl, C. F., E., "The Fire Resistance of
Builders' Handbook: Data for
"Fire Hazard of Internal Partitions being Tabulated:
Architects, Structural Engin-
Linings," National Building Results of Fire Tests Conduc-
eers, Contractors, and
Studies, Special Report, No. ted by the Committee,"
Draughtsmen, comp. by a
22, Dept. of Scientific and Journal of the British Fire
Staff of Specialists and H.
Industrial Research and Fire Prevention Committee, No. IX,
Parker, editor-in-chief, 18th
Offices' Committee (Joint Fire London, 1914.
ed., enl., J. Wiley, New York,
Research Organization),
1936. 31. Ryan, J. V., and Bender,
London, 1954.
E. W., "Fire Tests of Precast
17. Parker, H., Gay, C. M., and
25. Menzel, C. A., Tests of the Cellular Concrete Floors and
MacGuire, J. W., Materials and
Fire-Resistance and Strength Roofs," National Bureau of
Methods of Architectural
of Walls Concrete Masonry Standards Monograph, 45,
Construction, 3rd ed., J. Wiley,
Units, Portland Cement Washington, April 1962.
New York, 1958.
Association, Chicago, 1934.
32. Kingberg, S. H., and Foster,
18. Dietz, A. G. H., Dwelling
26. Hamilton, S. B., "A Short H. D., "Fire Resistance of
House Construction, The MIT
History of the Structural Fire Hollow Load-Bearing Wall
Press, Cambridge, 1971.
Protection of Buildings Tile," National Bureau of
19. Crosby, E. U., and Fiske, H. Particularly in England," Standards Research Paper,
A., Handbook of Fire Protec- National Building Studies, No. 37, (Reprint from NBS
tion, 5th ed., The Insurance Special Report, No. 27, Dept. Journal of Research, Vol. 2)
Field Company, Louisville, of Scientific and Industrial Washington, 1929.
Ky., 1914. Research (Building Research
33. Hull, W. A., and Ingberg,
Station), London, 1958.
20. Crosby, E. U., Fiske, H. A., S. H., "Fire Resistance of
and Forster, H. W., Handbook 27. Sachs, E. O., and Marsland, Concrete Columns," Techno-
of Fire Protection, 8th ed., E., "The Fire Resistance of logic Papers of the Bureau of
R. S. Moulton, general editor, Doors and Shutters being Standards, No. 272, Vol. 18,
National Fire Protection Tabulated: Results of Fire Washington, 1925, pp.
Association, Boston, 1936. Tests Conducted by the 635708.
Committee," Journal of the
British Fire Prevention
Appendix CBibliography C-3
34. National Board of Fire National Bureau of Standards, 48. Central Housing Committee
Underwriters, Fire Resistance Washington, April 1953. on Research, Design, and
Ratings of Less than One Construction, Subcommittee
42. Ingberg, S. H., "Fire Tests of
Hour, New York, Aug. 1956. on Definitions, "A Glossary of
Brick Walls," Building
Housing Terms," Building
35. Harmathy, T. Z., "Ten Rules Materials and Structures,
Materials and Structures,
of Fire Endurance Rating," Report BMS 143, National
Report BMS 91, National
Fire Technology, Vol. 1, May Bureau of Standards,
Bureau of Standards,
1965, pp. 93102. Washington, Nov. 1954.
Washington, Sept. 1942.
36. Son, B. C., "Fire Endurance 43. National Bureau of Stan-
49. Crosby, E. U., Fiske, H. A.,
Test on a Steel Tubular dards, "Fire Resistance and
and Forster, H. W., Handbook
Column Protected with Sound Insulation Ratings for
of Fire Protection, 7th ed.,
Gypsum Board," National Walls, Partitions, and Floors,"
D. Van Nostrand Co., New
Bureau of Standards, NBSIR, Technical Report on Building
York 1924.
73-165, Washington, 1973. Materials, 44, Washington,
1946. 50. Bird, E. L., and Docking, S. J.,
37. Galbreath, M., "Fire Tests of
Fire in Buildings, A. & C.
Wood Door Assemblies," Fire 44. Malhotra, H. L., "Fire
Black, London, 1949.
Study, No. 36, Div. of Building Resistance of Brick and Block
Research, National Research Walls," Fire Note, No. 6, 51. American Institute of Steel
Council Canada, Ottawa, May Ministry of Technology and Construction, Fire Resistant
1975. Fire Offices' Committee Joint Construction in Modern Steel-
Fire Research Organization, Framed Buildings, New York,
38. Morris, W. A., "An Investi-
London, HMSO, 1966. 1959.
gation into the Fire Resis-
tance of Timber Doors," Fire 45. Mitchell, N. D., "Fire Tests of 52. Central Dockyard Labora-
Research Note, No. 855, Fire Steel Columns Protected with tory, "Fire Retardant Paint
Research Station, Boreham Siliceous Aggregate Concrete," Tests: A Critical Review," CDL
Wood, Jan. 1971. Building Materials and Struc- Technical Memorandum, No.
tures, Report BMS 124, P87/73, H. M. Naval Base,
39. Hall, G. S., "Fire Resistance
National Bureau of Standards, Portsmouth, Dec. 1973.
Tests of Laminated Timber
Washington, May 1951.
Beams," Timber Association 53. Malhotra, H. L., "Fire
Research Report, WR/RR/1, 46. Freitag, J. K., Fire Prevention Resistance of Structural
High Sycombe, July 1968. and Fire Protection as Applied Concrete Beams," Fire
to Building Construction: A Research Note, No. 741, Fire
40. Goalwin, D. S., "Fire Resis-
Handbook of Theory and Research Station, Boreham-
tance of Concrete Floors,"
Practice, 2nd ed., J. Wiley, wood, May 1969.
Building Materials and
New York, 1921.
Structures, Report BMS 134, 54. Abrams, M. S., and
National Bureau of Standards, 47. Ingberg, S. H., and Mitchell, Gustaferro, A. H., "Fire Tests
Washington, Dec. 1952. N. D., "Fire Tests of Wood and of PokeThru Assemblies,"
Metal-Framed Partition," Research and Development
41. Mitchell, N. D., and Ryan,
Building Materials and Bulletin, 1481-1, Portland
J. V., "Fire Tests of Steel
Structures, Report BMS 71, Cement Association, Skokie,
Columns Encased with
National Bureau of Standards, 1971.
Gypsum Lath and Plaster,"
Washington, 1941.
Building Materials and 55. Bullen, M. L., "A Note on the
Structures, Report BMS 135, Relationship between Scale
Fire Experiments and
C-4 Fire Ratings of Archaic Materials and Assemblies
Standard Test Results," Paper, No. 18, Dept. of 69. Structural Clay Products
Building Research Scientific and Industrial Institute, "Fire Resistance,"
Establishment Note, N51/75, Research (Building Research Technical Notes on Brick and
Borehamwood, May 1975. Station), London, HMSO, Tile Construction, 16 rev.,
1953. Washington, 1964.
56. The America Fore Group of
Insurance Companies, 62. Building Research Establish- 70. Ramsey, C. G., and Sleeper,
Research Department, Some ment, "Timber Fire Doors," H. R., Architectural Graphic
Characteristic Fires in Fire Digest, 220, Borehamwood, Standards for Architects,
Resistive Buildings, Selected Nov. 1978. Engineers, Decorators, Build-
from 20 years record in the ers, and Draftsmen, 3rd ed., J.
63. Massachusetts State Building
files of the N.F.P.A. "Quart- Wiley, New York, 1941.
Code, Recommended Provi-
erly." New York, c. 1933.
sions, Article 22: "Repairs, 71. Underwriters' Laboratories,
57. Spiegelhalter, F., "Guide to Alterations, Additions, and Fire Protection Equipment List,
Design of Cavity Barriers and Change of Use of Existing Chicago, Jan. 1957.
Fire Stops," Current Paper, CP Buildings," Boston, Oct. 23,
72. Underwriters' Laboratories,
7/77, Building Research 1978.
Fire Resistance Director; with
Establishment, Borehamwood,
64. Freitag, J. K., Architectural Hourly Ratings for Beams,
Feb. 1977.
Engineering; with Especial Columns, Floors, Roofs, Walls,
58. Wardle, T. M. "Notes on the Reference to High Building and Partitions, Chicago, Jan.
Fire Resistance of Heavy Construction, Including Many 1977.
Timber Construction," Examples of Prominent Office
73. Mitchell, N. D., "Fire Tests of
Information Series, No. 53, Buildings, 2nd ed., rewritten,
Gunite Slabs and Partitions,"
New Zealand Forest Service, J. Wiley, New York, 1906.
Building Materials and
Wellington, 1966.
65. Architectural Record, Structures, Report BMS 131,
59. Fisher, R. W., and Smart, P. Sweet's Indexed Catalogue of National Bureau of Standards,
M. T., "Results of Fire Building Construction for the Washington, May 1952.
Resistance Tests on Elements Year 1906, New York, 1906.
74. Woolson, I. H., and Miller, R.
of Building Construction,"
66. Dept. of Commerce, Building P., "Fire Tests of Floors in the
Building Research
Code Committee, "Recom- United States," Proceedings,
Establishment Report, G R6,
mended Minimum International Association for
London, HMSO, 1975.
Requirements for Fire Testing Materials, VI
60. Serex, E. R., "Fire Resistance Resistance in Buildings," Congress, New York, 1912,
of Alta Bates Gypsum Block Building and Housing, No. 14, Section C, pp. 3641.
Non-Load Bearing Wall," National Bureau of Standards,
75. Underwriters' Laboratories,
Report to Alta Bates Com- Washington, 1931.
"An Investigation of the
munity Hospital, Structural
67. British Standards Institution, Effects of Fire Exposure upon
Research Laboratory Report,
"Fire Tests on Building Hollow Concrete Building
ES-7000, University of Calif.,
Materials and Structures," Units, Conducted for Amer-
Berkeley, 1969.
British Standards, 476, Pt. 1, ican Concrete Institute,
61. Thomas, F. G., and Webster, London, 1953. Concrete Products
C. T., "Investigations on Association, Portland Cement
68. Lonberg-Holm, K., "Glass,"
Building Fires, Part VI: The Association, Joint
The Architectural Record, Oct.
Fire Resistance of Reinforced Submittors," Retardant
1930, pp. 345357.
Concrete Columns," National Report, No. 1555, Chicago,
Building Studies, Research May 1924.
Appendix CBibliography C-5
76. Dept. of Scientific & Indust- 81. California State Historical 88. Heselden, A. J. M., Smith,
rial Research and of the Fire Building Code, Draft, 1978. P. G., and Theobald, C. R.,
Offices' Committee, Joint "Fires in a Large
82. Fisher, F. L., et al., "A Study
Committee of the Building Compartment Containing
of Potential Flashover Fires in
Research Board, "Fire Grad- Structural Steelwork: Detailed
Wheeler Hall and the Results
ings of Buildings, Part IV: Measurements of Fire
from a Full Scale Fire Test of
Chimneys and Flues," Post- Behavior," Fire Research Note,
a Modified Wheeler Hall Door
War Building Studies, No. 29, No. 646, Fire Research
Assembly," Fire Research
London, HMSO, 1952. Station, Borehamwood, Dec.
Laboratory Report, UCX 77-3;
1966.
77. National Research Council of UCX-2480, University of
Canada. Associate Committee Calif., Dept. of Civil Eng., 89. Ministry of Technology and
on the National Building Berkeley, 1977. Fire Offices' Committee Joint
Code, Fire Performance Fire Research Organization,
83. Freitag, J. K., The Fireproof-
Ratings, Suppl. No. 2 to the "Fire and Structural Use of
ing of Steel Buildings , 1st ed.,
National Building Code of Timber in Buildings: Proceed-
J. Wiley, New York, 1906.
Canada, Ottawa, 1965. ings of the Symposium Held
84. Gross, D., "Field Burnout at the Fire Research Station,
78. Associated Factory Mutual
Tests of Apartment Dwellings Borehamwood, Herts, on 25th
Fire Insurance Companies,
Units," Building Science Series, October, 1967," Symposium,
The National Board of Fire
10, National Bureau of No. 3, London, HMSO, 1970.
Underwriters, and the Bureau
Standards, Washington, 1967.
of Standards, Fire Tests of 90. Shoub, and Gross, D., "Doors
Building Columns: An 85. Dunlap, M. E., and as Barriers to Fire and
Experimental Investigation of Cartwright, F. P., "Standard Smoke," Building Science
the Resistance of Columns, Fire Tests for Combustible Series, 3, National Bureau of
Loaded and Exposed to Fire or Building Materials," Proceed- Standards, Washington, 1966.
to Fire and Water, with Record ings of the American Society
91. Ingberg, S. H., "The Fire
of Characteristic Effects. for Testing Materials, vol. 27,
Resistance of Gypsum Parti-
Jointly conducted at Under- Philadelphia, 1927, pp.
tions," Proceedings of the
writers' Laboratories, Chicago, 534546.
American Society for Testing
191719.
86. Menzel, C. A., "Tests of the and Materials, vol. 25, Phila-
79. Malhotra, H. L., "Effect of Fire Resistance and Stability delphia, 1925, pp. 299314.
Age on the Fire Resistance of of Walls of Concrete Masonry
92. Ingberg, S.H., "Influence of
Reinforced Concrete Units," Proceedings of the
Mineral Composition of
Columns," Fire Research American Society for Testing
Aggregates on Fire Resistance
Memorandum, No. 1, Fire Materials, vol. 31, Philadel-
of Concrete," Proceedings of
Research Station, Boreham- phia, 1931, pp. 607660.
the American Society for
wood, April 1970.
87. Steiner, A. J., "Method of Testing and Materials, vol. 29,
80. Bond, H., ed., Research on Fire-Hazard Classification of Philadelphia, 1929, pp.
Fire: A Description of the Building Materials," Bulletin of 824829.
Facilities, Personnel and the American Society for
93. Ingberg, S. H., "The Fire
Management of Agencies Testing and Materials, March
Resistive Properties of
Engaged in Research on Fire, 1943, Philadelphia, 1943, pp.
Gypsum," Proceedings of the
a Staff Report, National Fire 1922.
American Society for Testing
Protection Association,
and Materials, vol. 23,
Boston, 1957.
C-6 Fire Ratings of Archaic Materials and Assemblies
Philadelphia, 1923, pp. 100. Central Housing Committee 105. Steingiser, S., "A Philosophy
254256. on Research, Design, and of Fire Testing," Journal of
Construction, Subcommittee Fire & Flammability, vol. 3,
94. Gottschalk, F. W., "Some
on Building Codes, "Recom- July 1972, pp. 238253.
Factors in the Interpretation
mended Building Code
of Small-Scale Tests for Fire- 106. Yuill, C. H., Bauerschlag,
Requirements for New
Retardant Wood," Bulletin of W. H., and Smith, H. M., "An
Dwelling Construction with
the American Society for Evaluation of the Compar-
Special Reference to War
Testing and Materials, ative Performance of 2.4.1
Housing, Report," Building
October 1945, pp. 4043. Plywood and Two-Inch
Materials and Structures,
Lumber Roof Decking under
95. Ministry of Technology and Report BMS 88, National
Equivalent Fire Exposure,"
Fire Offices' Committee Joint Bureau of Standards,
Fire Protection Section, Final
Fire Research Organization, Washington, Sept. 1942.
Report, Project No. 717A-3-211,
"Behaviour of Structural Steel
101. De Coppet Bergh, D., Safe Southwest Research Institute,
in Fire: Proceedings of the
Building Construction: A Dept. of Structural Research,
Symposium Held at the Fire
Treatise Giving in Simplest San Antonio, Dec. 1962.
Research Station Boreham-
Forms Possible Practical and
wood, Herts, on 24th January 107. Ashton, L. A., and Smart,
Theoretical Rules and
1967," Symposium No. 2, P. M. T., Sponsored Fire
Formulae Used in Construc-
London, HMSO, 1968. Resistance Tests on Structural
tion of Buildings and General
Elements, London, Dept. of
96. Gustaferro, A. H., and Instruction, new ed., thor-
Scientific and Industrial
Martin, L. D., Design for Fire oughly rev. Macmillan Co.,
Research and Fire Offices'
Resistance of Pre-cast Con- New York, 1908.
Committee, London, 1960.
crete, prep. for the Prestress-
102. Cyclopedia of Fire Preven-
ed Concrete Institute Fire 108. Butcher, E. G., Chitty, T. B.,
tion and Insurance: a General
Committee, 1st ed., Chicago, and Ashton, L. A., "The
Reference Work on Fire and
PCI, 1977. Temperature Attained by
Fire Losses, Fireproof Construc-
Steel in Building Fires," Fire
97. "The Fire Endurance of tion, Building Inspection..., prep.
ResearchTechnical Paper,
Concrete: A Special Issue," by architects, engineers, under-
No. 15, Ministry of Techno-
Concrete Construction, vol. writers and practical insur-
logy and Fire Offices' Com-
18, no. 8, Aug. 1974, pp. ance men. American School of
mittee, Joint Fire Research
345440. Correspondence, Chicago,
Organization, London, HMSO,
1912.
98. The British Constructional 1966.
Steelwork Association, 103. Setchkin, N. P., and Ingberg,
109. Dept. of the Environment
"Modern Fire Protection for S. H., "Test Criterion for an
and Fire Offices' Committee,
Structural Steelwork," Incombustible Material,"
Joint Fire Research Organiza-
Publication No. FP1, London, Proceedings of the American
tion, "Fire-Resistance
1961. Society for Testing Materials ,
Requirements for Buildings
vol. 45, Philadelphia, 1945,
99. Underwriters' Laboratories, A New Approach; Proceedings
pp. 866877.
"Fire Hazard Classification of of the Symposium Held at the
Building Materials," Bulletin 104. Underwriters' Laboratories, Connaught Rooms, London,
No. 32, Sept. 1944, Chicago, "Report on Fire Hazard Class- 28 September 1971,"
1959. ification of Various Species of Symposium, No. 5, London,
Lumber," Retardant, 3365, HMSO, 1973.
Chicago, 1952.
Appendix CBibliography C-7
110. Langdon Thomas, G. J., 117. Ferris, J. E., "Fire Hazards 123. Structural Clay Products
"Roofs and Fire," Fire Note, of Combustible Wallboards," Institute, "Estimating the Fire
No. 3, Dept. of Scientific and Commonwealth Experimental Resistance of Clay Masonry
Industrial Research and Fire Building Station Special WallsII", Technical Notes on
Offices' Committee, Joint Fire Report, No. 18, Sydney, Oct. Brick & Tile Construction , vol.
Research Organization, 1955. 4, no. 1, San Francisco, Jan.
London, HMSO, 1963. 1953.
118. Markwardt, L. J., Bruce,
111. National Fire Protection H. D., and Freas, A. D., "Brief 124. Building Research Station,
Association and the National Description of Some Fire-Test "Fire: Materials and Struc-
Board of Fire Underwriters, Methods Used for Wood and tures," Digest, No. 106,
Report on Fire in the Edison Wood-Based Materials," Forest London, HMSO, 1958.
Phonograph Works, Thomas Service Report, No. 1976,
125. Mitchell, N. D., "Fire Hazard
A. Edison, Inc., West Orange, Forest Products Laboratory,
Tests with Masonry Chim-
N.J., December 9, 1914, Madison, 1976.
neys," NFPA Publication, No.
Boston, 1915.
119. Foster, H. D., Pinkston, Q-43-7, Boston, Oct. 1949.
112. Thompson, J. P., Fire E. R., and Ingberg, S. H., "Fire
126. Clinton Wire Cloth
Resistance of Reinforced Resistance of Walls of Gravel-
Company, Some Test Data on
Concrete Floors, Portland Aggregate Concrete Masonry
Fireproof Floor Construction
Cement Association, Chicago, Units," Building Materials and
Relating to Cinder Concrete,
1963. Structures, Report, BMS 120,
Terra Cotta and Gypsum,
National Bureau of Standards,
113. Forest Products Laboratory, Clinton, 1913.
Washington, March 1951.
"Fire Resistance Tests of
127. Structural Engineers
Plywood Covered Wall Panels," 120. Foster, H. D., Pinkston, E.R.,
Association of Southern
Information reviewed and and Ingberg, S. H., "Fire
California, Fire Ratings
reaffirmed, Forest Service Resistance of Walls of Light-
Subcommittee, "Fire Ratings,
Report, No. 1257, Madison, weight-Aggregate Concrete
A Report," part of Annual
April l961. Masonry Units," Building
Report, Los Angeles, 1962,
Materials and Structures,
114. Forest Products Laboratory, pp. 3038.
Report BMS 117, National
"Charring Rate of Selected
Bureau of Standards, Wash- 128. Lawson, D. I., Fox, L. L., and
WoodsTransverse to Grain,"
ington, May 1950. Webster, C. T., "The Heating
Forest Service Research Paper,
of Panels by Flue Pipes," Fire
FLP 69, Madison, April 1967. 121. Structural Clay Products
Research, Special Report, No.
Institute, "Structural Clay Tile
115. Bird, G. I., "Protection of 1, Dept. of Scientific and
Fireproofing," Technical Notes
Structural Steel Against Fire," Industrial Research and Fire
on Brick & Tile Construction,
Fire Note, No. 2, Dept. of Offices' Committee, London,
vol. 1, no. 11, San Francisco,
Scientific and Industrial HMSO, 1952.
Nov. 1950.
Research and Fire Offices'
129. Forest Products Laboratory,
Committee, Joint Fire 122. Structural Clay Products
"Fire Resistance of Wood
Research Organization, Institute, "Fire Resistance
Construction," excerpt from
London, HMSO, 1961. Ratings of Clay Masonry
"Wood HandbookBasic
WallsI," Technical Notes on
116. Robinson, W. C., The Parker Information on Wood as a
Brick & Tile Construction,
Building Fire, Underwriters' Material of Construction with
vol. 3, no. 12, San Francisco,
Laboratories, Chicago, c. 1908. Data for its Use in Design and
Dec. 1952.
Specification," Dept. of
Agriculture Handbook, No. 72,
C-8 Fire Ratings of Archaic Materials and Assemblies
Washington, 195_, pp. and Lime Plaster Interior 144. Hold, H. G., Fire Protection
337350. Finish," Publication, SP.1.230, in Buildings, Crosby, Lock-
Chicago, Nov. 1922. wood, London, 1913.
130. Goalwin, D. S., "Properties
of Cavity Walls," Building 137. Underwriters' Laboratories, 145. Kollbrunner, C. F., "Steel
Materials and Structures, "Report on Interior Building Buildings and Fire Protection
Report BMS 136, National Construction Consisting of in Europe," Journal of the
Bureau of Standards, Metal Lath and Gypsum Structural Division, ASCE, vol.
Washington, May 1953. Plaster on Wood-Supports," 85, no. ST9, Proc. Paper 2264,
Retardant, No. 1355, Chicago, Nov. 1959, pp. 125149.
131. Humphrey, R. L., "The Fire-
1922.
Resistive Properties of 146. Smith, P., "Investigation and
Various Building Materials," 138. Underwriters' Laboratories, Repair of Damage to Concrete
Geological Survey Bulletin, "An Investigation of the Caused by Formwork and
370, Washington, 1909. Effects of Fire Exposure upon Falsework Fire," Journal of the
Hollow Concrete Building American Concrete Institute,
132. National Lumber Manufac-
Units," Retardant, No. 1555, vol. 60, Title no. 6066, Nov.
turers Association, "Compar-
Chicago, May 1924. 1963, pp. 15351566.
ative Fire Test on Wood and
Steel Joists," Technical Report, 139. Moran, T. H., "Comparative 147. "Repair of Fire Damage," 3
No. 1, Washington, 1961. Fire Resistance Ratings of parts, Concrete Construction,
Douglas Fir Plywood," Doug- MarchMay, 1972.
133. National Lumber Manufac-
las Fir Plywood Association
turers Association, "Compar- 148. National Fire Protection
Laboratory Bulletin, 57-A,
ative Fire Test of Timber and Association, National Fire
Tacoma, 1957.
Steel Beams," Technical Codes: A Compilation of NFPA
Report, No. 3, Washington, 140. Gage Babcock & Assoc- Codes, Standards, Recom-
1963. iation, "The Performance of mended Practices and
Fire Protective Materials Manuals, 16 vols., Boston,
134. Malhotra, H. L., and Morris,
under Varying Conditions of 1978.
W. A., "Tests on Roof Con-
Fire Severity," Report 6924,
struction Subjected to 149. Ingberg, S. H. "Tests of
Chicago, 1969.
External Fire," Fire Note, No. Severity of Building Fires,"
4, Dept. of Scientific and 141. International Conference of NFPA Quarterly, vol. 22, no.
Industrial Research and Fire Building Officials, Uniform 1, July 1928, pp. 4361.
Offices' Committee, Joint Fire Building Code, Whittier, CA,
150. Underwriters' Laboratories,
Research Organization, 1979.
"Fire Exposure Tests of
London, HMSO, 1963.
142. Babrauskas, V., and Ordinary Wood Doors,"
135. Brown, C. R., "Fire Tests of Williamson, R. B., "The Hist- Bulletin of Research, no. 6,
Treated and Untreated Wood orical Basis of Fire Resistance Dec. 1938, Chicago, 1942.
Partitions," Research Paper, Testing, Part I and Part II,"
151. Parson, H., "The Tall
RP 1076, part of Journal of Fire Technology, vol. 14, no. 3
Building under Test of Fire,"
Research of the National & 4, Aug. & Nov. 1978, pp.
Red Book, no. 17, British Fire
Bureau of Standards, vol. 20, 184194, 205, 304316.
Prevention Committee,
Washington, Feb. 1938, pp.
143. Underwriters' Laboratories, London, 1899.
217237.
"Fire Tests of Building Con-
152. Sachs, E. O., "The British
136. Underwriters' Laboratories, struction and Materials," 8th
Fire Prevention Committee
"Report on Investigation of ed., Standard for Safety,
Testing Station," Red Book,
Fire Resistance of Wood Lath UL263, Chicago, 1971.
Appendix CBibliography C-9
no. 13, British Fire Prevention 163. Engineering Record, vol. 35,
Committee, London, 1899. Jan. 2, 1897, pp. 9394; May
29, 1897, pp. 558560; vol.
153. Sachs, E. O., "Fire Tests
36, Sept. 18, 1897, pp.
with Unprotected Columns,"
337340; Sept. 25, 1897, pp.
Red Book, No. 11, British Fire
359363; Oct. 2, 1897, pp.
Prevention Committee,
382387; Oct. 9, 1897, pp.
London, 1899.
402405.
154. British Fire Prevention
164. Babrauskas, Vytenis, "Fire
Committee, "Fire Tests with
Endurance in Buildings," PhD
Floors: A Floor by the
Thesis. Fire Research Group,
Expended Metal Company,"
Report, No. UCB FRG 76-16,
Red Book, no. 14, London,
University of California,
1899.
Berkeley, Nov. 1976.
155. Engineering News, vol. 56,
165. The Institution of Struc-
Aug. 9, 1906, pp. 135140.
tural Engineers and The
156. Engineering News, vol. 36, Concrete Society, Fire Resis-
Aug. 6, 1896, pp. 9294. tance of Concrete Structures,
London, Aug. 1975.
157. Bauschinger, J.,
Mittheilungen de Mech.-Tech. 166. English Heritage, Timber
Lab. der K. Tech. Hochschule, Paneled Doors and Fire , An
Munchen, vol. 12, 1885. English Heritage Technical
Guidance Note, London, May
158. Engineering News, vol. 46,
1997.
Dec. 26, 1901, pp. 482486,
489490. 167. Ruikar, V.G. "Report on the
1-Hour Fire Endurance Test of
159. The American Architect and
Superlite I XL Glazing in a
jBuilding News, vol. 31, March
Hollow Metal Frame and Door
28, 1891, pp. 195201.
System," WHI Report No.
160. British Fire Prevention 4951324 of 1/17/95,
Committee, First International Inchscape Testing Services,
Fire Prevention Congress, Warnock Hersey, Pittsburg,
Official Congress Report, California.
London, 1903.
HUD USER
Rockville, MD 20849
Permit No. G-795
_______________________
Official Business
February 2000