Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/41826980
CITATIONS READS
11 103
12 authors, including:
Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects:
All content following this page was uploaded by Wolfgang Hitzl on 16 August 2017.
Original Article
Purpose. To evaluate the prevalence and association of different types and severities of cataract or
pseudophakia with visual impairments in older European drivers.
Methods. In this prospective European multicenter study, 2211 active drivers, 45 years of age and
older, participated in an ophthalmologic examination, the measurement of visual functions, and were
asked to fill in the NEI-VFQ-25 and another questionnaire about driving habits, driving difficulties, and
self-reported accidents.
Results. Prevalence of moderate and severe forms of cataract in an active driving population is lower
than that in the general population, but could be found in both eyes in 20% (95% confidence interval
[CI] 16%25%) and 17% (95% CI:13%21%) of subjects 75 years of age and older. In addition, there
is a strong relationship between severity of cataract and parameters such as age, visual acuity, intrao-
cular straylight, and contrast sensitivity.
Conclusions. Cataract is not as highly prevalent in the elderly active driving population as in the general
population, but is frequently present in drivers over 65 years of age. Lower prevalence of severe bilate-
ral cataracts in countries with mandatory tests of visual functions of drivers suggest that this could be
a suitable measure to detect and to reduce the number of active drivers with severe bilateral cataracts.
(Eur J Ophthalmol 2010; 20: 892-901)
color (NC: 0.16.9), and cortical (C: 0.15.9) and posterior about driving habits, driving difficulties, and self-reported
subcapsular (P: 0.15.9) cataract, using the Lens Opacities accidents. The other questionnaire was the NEI-VFQ-25
Classification System (LOCS) III (17). According to the ave- about quality of life and quality of vision (24, 25). In ad-
rage LOCS III value (average of NO, NC, C, P), lens opaci- dition, all subjects were asked for a brief medical and
ties were defined as no cataract (avLOCS<1.5), mild cata- ophthalmologic history.
ract (1.5avLOCS<2), moderate cataract (2avLOCS<3),
and severe cataract (avLOCS3). Statistical analysis
In addition, lens opacities were categorized into 5 groups
of different types. To compare outcome between different Analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to test for signi-
types of cataracts, only cataracts with a defined range of ficant differences between means. Categorized whisker
intensity were used for this evaluation: nuclear (2NO4, plots together with 95% confidence intervals (CI) for the
2NC4, C<2, P1.5), cortical (NO<2, NC<2, 2C4, corresponding means were used to illustrate results. Pear-
P1.5), posterior subcapsular ((NO<2, NC<2, C<2, son chi square tests were used to test for significance of
1.5P4), mixed nuclear-cortical (2NO4, 2NC4, the relationship between categorical variables. 95% CIs for
2C4, P1.5), and mixed nuclear-cortical-posterior age-specific prevalences were computed based on Pear-
subcapsular (2NO4, 2NC4, 2C4, 1.5P4). The son-Clopper intervals. The Kruskal-Wallis test was used to
presence of surgical aphakia or an intraocular lens was re- compare 3 or more samples as a nonparametric alternative
corded as well as the presence of posterior capsule opa- to one-way (between-groups) ANOVA for continuous and
cification. ordinal scaled variables. The Z-test was used to test for
significance between 2 sample proportions. All results of
Vision measurement statistical analysis refer to right eyes. If left eyes differed
significantly, these differences were reported. All statisti-
Driving visual acuity (DVA) with habitual glasses and best- cal analyses and illustrations were done with STATISTICA
corrected distance visual acuity (BCDVA) were measured 6.0 (StatSoft, Inc., STATISTICA for Windows, Tulsa, OK:
monocularly using the Early Treatment of Diabetic Retino- StatSoft, Inc., 1999.).
pathy Study (ETDRS) chart (18). Both were determined as
the smallest completed line read correctly by the examinee
at a test distance of 4 meters and a constant luminance of Results
80 to 90 cd/m2, and expressed as logarithm of the minimal
angle of resolution (logMAR) units. Contrast sensitivity (CS)
was measured in each eye with the Pelli-Robson (PR) chart
Prevalence of cataract and pseudophakia
and expressed as log (percentage contrast) (19). A compu-
terized straylight meter was used for measuring intraocular Figure 1 shows the frequencies of different types of cata-
straylight (IOSL). For the purpose of traffic studies, it has ract and their overlap in our study population. The most
been modified from the conventional straylight meter. Ma- common type of cataract in active driving persons of ol-
jor modifications included measurement by means of a 2 dest age category IV was a nuclear opacification of the
alternative force choice strategy and the inclusion of com- lens (NO2), which could be found in 68% of female and
puter routines to allow calculation of measurement quality 80% of male participants (Tab. I). A cortical opacification
(20, 21). Trial glasses were provided according to the di- (CO) of 2 in the LOCS III classification system could be
stance correction of the subject, with a near addition ac- detected in 56% (female) and 68% (male) and posterior
cording to age. Each eye was measured twice. Data were subcapsular cataract of a intensity 2 in 12% (female) and
also expressed as log (straylight parameter). 36% (male) of the oldest age category. For all 3 types of
lens opacification, a positive relation between age and pre-
Perceived driving disability and medical history valence could be found, indicating increasing prevalence
with increasing age. In age categories IIIV, more male than
Subjects were asked to fill in 2 questionnaires. One que- female persons could be recruited.
stionnaire that was used in previous studies (22, 23) was In addition, we categorized eyes of examined subjects by
TABLE I - NUMBER OF ACTIVE DRIVERS [PREVALENCE (%)] WITH LENS OPACITIES BY AGE AND SEX
2.0 <3.0
4554 323 44 (13.6) 293 38 (13.0) 323 25 (7.7) 291 40 (13.7) 240 4 (1.7) 222 3 (1.4)
5564 296 79 (26.7) 355 106 (29.9) 296 68 (23.0) 355 84 (23.7) 233 16 (6.9) 276 20 (7.2)
6574 179 58 (32.4) 268 93 (34.7) 178 49 (27.5) 266 113 (42.5) 153 17 (11.1) 200 35 (17.5)
75 79 23 (29.1) 151 46 (30.5) 79 27 (34.2) 151 60 (39.7) 71 15 (21.1) 132 35 (26.5)
3.0 <4.0
4554 6 (1.9) 7 (2.4) 0 (0.0) 0 (0.0) 1 (0.3) 1 (0.3)
5564 29 (9.8) 25 (7.0) 10 (3.4) 11 (3.1) 1 (0.3) 3 (0.8)
6574 34 (19.0) 50 (18.7) 18 (10.1) 29 (10.9) 5 (1.9) 7 (2.6)
75 21 (26.6) 44 (29.1) 11 (13.9) 34 (22.5) 1 (0.7) 17 (11.3)
4.0
4554 0 (0.0) 1 (0.3) 0 (0.0) 0 (0.0) 0 (0.0) 0 (0.0)
5564 5 (1.7) 6 (1.7) 0 (0.0) 1 (0.3) 1 (0.3) 1 (0.3)
6574 14 (7.8) 19 (7.1) 7 (3.9) 2 (0.8) 3 (1.1) 0 (0.0)
75 10 (12.7) 31 (20.5) 6 (7.6) 9 (6.0) 2 (1.3) 3 (2.0)
2.0
4554 50 (15.5) 46 (15.7) 25 (7.7) 40 (13.7) 5 (1.7) 4 (1.4)
5564 113 (38.2) 137 (38.6) 78 (26.4) 96 (27.0) 18 (5.1) 24 (6.8)
6574 106 (59.2) 162 (60.4) 74 (41.6) 144 (54.1) 25 (9.4) 42 (15.8)
75 54 (68.4) 121 (80.1) 44 (55.7) 103 (68.2) 18 (11.9) 55 (36.4)
TABLE II - NUMBER OF ACTIVE DRIVERS [PREVALENCE (%)] WITH CATARACT OR PSEUDOPHAKIA BY SEVERITY OF
CATARACT AND AGE
Cataract classification (LOCS III) Age I (4554 y), Age II (5564 y), Age III (6574 y), Age IV (75 y), All (45 y),
n (%) n (%) n (%) n (%) n (%)
No cataract (<1.5)
OD 508 (82.5) 361 (55.0) 144 (29.1) 51 (15.6) 1064 (50.9)
OS 501 (81.3) 361 (55.0) 144 (29.1) 56 (17.2) 1062 (50.8)
OU 491 (79.7) 343 (52.3) 135 (27.3) 43 (13.2) 1012 (48.4)
Mild cataract (1.5 <2)
OD 84 (13.6) 178 (27.1) 134 (27.1) 42 (12.9) 438 (20.9)
OS 84 (13.6) 179 (27.3) 128 (25.9) 39 (12.0) 430 (20.6)
OU 75 (12.2) 175 (26.7) 116 (23.5) 27 (8.3) 393 (18.8)
Moderate cataract (2 <3)
OD 17 (2.8) 93 (14.2) 128 (25.9) 92 (28.2) 330 (15.8)
OS 18 (2.9) 94 (14.3) 135 (27.3) 85 (26.1) 332 (15.9)
OU 14 (2.3) 79 (12.0) 114 (23.1) 66 (20.2) 273 (13.0)
Severe cataract (3)
OD 1 (0.2) 4 (0.6) 49 (9.9) 67 (20.6) 121 (5.8)
OS 1 (0.2) 6 (0.9) 49 (9.9) 72 (22.1) 128 (6.1)
OU 1 (0.2) 4 (0.6) 41 (8.3) 55 (16.9) 101 (4.8)
Pseudophakia
OD 2 (0.3) 7 (1.1) 37 (7.5) 66 (20.2) 112 (5.4)
OS 4 (0.6) 8 (1.2) 36 (7.3) 67 (20.6) 115 (5.5)
OU 2 (0.3) 5 (0.8) 28 (5.7) 52 (16.0) 87 (4.2)
LOCS = Lens Opacities Classification System; OD = right eye; OS = left eye; OU = both eyes.
ferent intensities of lens opacities or pseudophakia in both in because of vision (p<0.02), and staying in home alone
eyes. Increasing density of cataract resulted in a significant because of the persons eyesight (p<0.004).
(p<0.01) reduction of kilometers driven per year and a re-
duction of self-reported driving speed. Driving during bad Cataract type.With or without adjustment for age or cata-
weather or at night causes problems for about half of all ract intensity, no statistically significant difference between
the subjects, with no difference between groups. groups was found for questions about driving behavior or
Self-reported accident rate of persons with bilateral severe the NEI-VFQ-25 questionnaire (data not shown).
forms of cataract did not differ significantly from all other
groups. Participants with bilateral severe cataract or pseu-
dophakia had the highest self-reported accident rate, with DISCUSSION
4.3 accidents per million driven kilometers. Additionally, it
is of interest to note that the percentage of subjects who The development of lens opacities is a concomitant of
did not answer the question about involvement in traffic aging in every human population study. Up until now, our
accidents, but did answer the other questions of the dri- knowledge about prevalence of cataract in a population
ving habits questionnaire, was also the highest in the se- is based mainly on 4 major studies that were not perfor-
vere cataract and pseudophakic group. Driving behavior of med in European countries: The Blue Mountains Study, the
persons with bilateral pseudophakic eyes was, even after Melbourne Visual Impairment Project, the Beaver Dam Eye
age adjustment, related to reduced kilometers per year and Study, and the Framingham Eye Study (8, 9, 26, 27). Ho-
more frequently reported accidents per driven million kilo- wever, very little is known about the prevalence of cataract
meters, but not related to subjective difficulties in parking and pseudophakia and their effects on visual functions and
or driving during rush hour and not related to self-reported driving behavior in an active driving population.
reduced speed. The strengths of this study are the high number of inclu-
In the NEI-VFQ-25 questionnaire, statistically significant ded subjects and the participation of different clinics in a
differences (Pearson chi square) between different groups variety of European countries. If we compare our results,
of cataract severity could be found for questions about found in active drivers, with prevalence studies of cataract
general health (p<0.0001), general vision (p<0.0001), dif- in the general population, which used different cataract
ficulties seeing and enjoying programs on TV (p<0.03), li- grading methods, we can find similar results for frequen-
mitations in kinds of activities the persons can participate cy of mild/early cataract in patients between the ages of
TABLE III - DRIVING HABITS AND DRIVING DIFFICULTIES OF SUBJECTS WITH THE SAME INTENSITY OF LENS OPACIFICA-
TION IN BOTH EYES AFTER CORRECTION FOR AGE, MEAN (95% CONFIDENCE INTERVAL)
Cataract severity (OU) Km per year, Accidents Reduced Bad Self-reported driving Night
(LOCS III) mean per million speed weather difficulties
km
Parking Highway Rush hour
*Indicates corrected number of accidents per million driven kilometers when subjects who did not answer this question but did answer all other questions were
counted.
LOCS = Lens Opacities Classification System; OD = right eye; OS = left eye; OU = both eyes.
45 and 64 years. However, our results clearly demonstrate ces in BCDVA (0.06 vs 0.05 logMAR), intraocular straylight
that advanced stages of cataract in drivers have a preva- (1.29 vs 1.27 log [IOSL]), or contrast sensitivity (1.47 vs
lence that is significantly lower than that in the general po- 1.48 log [PR]), underscoring that reduced visual functions
pulation. Vision impairment by dense cataract could also in pseudophakic eyes are mainly age-related.
be a reason to abandon driving, which seems to be more Because lens opacities are heterogeneous, which could
likely for female subjects and for inhabitants of countries influence the optical quality of the retinal image and con-
with mandatory visual function tests for drivers. Whether sequently visual functions, we additionally evaluated our
they stopped driving by their own judgment or they had data according to different types of cataract. We have
to stop because of not passing tests for visual functions found statistically significant differences in visual impai-
which have to be performed regularly and are obligatory in rment between nuclear or cortical types of cataract and
counties like Spain or the Netherlands could not be evalua- mixed types of cataract. Mean values between nuclear
ted in this study. and cortical or posterior subcapsular cataracts differed for
Cataract classification was performed in our study without all evaluated visual functions, but were not statistically si-
pupillary dilatation, which could lead to an underestimation gnificant. However, the infrequent occurrence of pure PSC
of cataract severity, especially for cortical and posterior (only 23 eyes were available for this study) suggests that
subcapsular types of cataract. the data relating to this type of cataract must be interpre-
As we show in this study, there is a strong correlation ted cautiously.
between impairment of visual functions and intensity of Differences of visual function between different types of ca-
lens opacification independent of age. In addition to other taracts have been shown in many studies (35-39). Several
studies, we showed that visual acuity alone is not always studies suppose that a perfectly uniform, constant density
well related to vision impairment. Other aspects of visual of a medium, often seen in nuclear opacities, exhibits only
functions (IOSL, CS) may be as important even with reaso- a small amount of scattered light away from the forward
nably good visual acuity (28-30). direction (40). However, in cortical or posterior subcapsular
Interestingly, patients with pseudophakic eyes showed opacities, the medium contains more special fluctuations
comparable performance on visual function tests as per- in density, discontinuities in the refractive index, or sharp
sons with moderate cataract severity. One would expect limited ruptures of lens fibers, which can lead to a signi-
that after cataract surgery and implantation of a clear lens, ficant increase in light scatter, and consecutively decrea-
visual functions of this group would be much better than se of visual functions (40, 41). Additionally, the correlation
we found. The main reasons for this limited improvement between forward scatter that causes disability glare and
or decrease of visual functions after cataract surgery are backscatter derived from slit-lamp image seems to be low.
pseudophakia-related changes, such as posterior capsular Backscatter is clearly largest for nuclear cataract, but very
fibrosis or intraocular lens decentration, and most impor- small for cortical, and intermediate for posterior subcapsu-
tantly age-related changes of the eye. Decreasing visual lar cataract (42).
functions with age are not only lenticular of origin, but also Contrary to a report of Owsley et al., we could not detect
influenced by age-related pigmentation changes, such as any significant difference between crash rates of subjects
migration of uveal pigment from iris, or loss of melanin in with severe bilateral cataract and bilateral pseudophakia
the retinal pigment epithelium (31-33). In a previous study, (5). Although these 2 groups did not differ in age, driven
we showed that noncataractous straylight values increa- kilometers per year, or reported difficulties during challen-
se strongly with age to the power of 4 (34). On average, ging driving situations, they differed significantly in visual
straylight doubles in noncataractous eyes by the age of 65 functions and subjectively estimated speed compared to
years and triples by the age of 77 years as compared with the other traffic. It seems that the high self-reported crash
the young eye (34). Therefore it is not surprising that the rate we found in pseudophakic patients results from lower
pseudophakic group with a mean age of 76 years does not self-awareness of driving difficulties due to improved vi-
have similar visual functions as our no cataract group with sual functions after cataract surgery, which may result in
a mean age of 59 years. If we compare visual functions of driving at higher speed, one common risk factor for vehicle
the noncataractous age group IV (mean age of 77 years) accidents in general (43).
with the pseudophakic group we do not find any differen- In summary, we found that cataract is not as highly pre-
valent in the elderly active driving population than in the Salzburg part was supported by the Ernst Fuchs Stiftung. The
general population, but is still very frequent in drivers over Belgian part was supported and the Dutch part cosupported
the age of 65 years. Interestingly, there were significant dif- by Pearle BV. The German part was cosupported by Vistech
ferences in prevalence of bilateral severe forms of cataract GmbH. The RACC Automvil Club supported recruitment of
in active drivers between European countries. The regular subjects in Barcelona.
and mandatory testing of visual functions of active drivers
in Spain and the Netherlands seems to result in a signi-
ficantly lower percentage of drivers with severe forms of The Netherlands Ophthalmic Research Institute has a proprietary in-
terest in the straylight meter. None of the authors has any proprietary
bilateral cataract that impaired visual functions greatly. In
or financial interest in any of the tests that were used or in any of the
order to detect and reduce the number of these impaired results that were obtained in this study.
active drivers in other countries, regular and mandatory
eye examinations of drivers performed by ophthalmolo-
gists should be considered.
REFERENCES cataract: driving habits and crash risk. J Gerontol Med Sci
1999; 54: M203-11.
1. Eberhard JW. Driving is transportation for most older adults. 11. McGwin G, Chapman V, Owsley C. Visual risk factors for driv-
Geriatrics 1998; 53 (Suppl 1): S53-5. ing difficulty among older drivers. Accid Anal Prev 2000; 32:
2. Foley DJ, Heimovitz HK, Guralnik JM, Brock DB. Driving life 735-44.
expectancy of persons aged 70 years and older in the United 12. Mangione CM, Phillips RS, Seddon JM, et al. Development of
States. Am J Public Health 2002; 92: 1284-9. the activities of daily vision scale: a measure of visual func-
3. Statistics Austria. Bevoelkerung Oesterreichs im 21 Jahrhun- tional status. Med Care 1992; 30: 1111-26.
dert. Statistische Nachrichten 2004; 12: 1030-4. 13. Ball K, Owsley C, Stalvey B, Roenker DL, Graves M. Driving
4. Freeman EE, Munoz B, Turano KA, West SK. Measures of avoidance and functional impairment in older drivers. Accid
visual function and their association with driving modification Anal Prev 1998; 30: 313-22.
in older adults. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2006; 47: 514-20. 14. Szlyk JP, Seiple W, Viana M. Relative effects of age and com-
5. Owsley C, McGwin G Jr, Sloane M, Wells J, Stalvey BT, Gau- promised vision on driving performance. Hum Factors 1995;
theraux S. Impact of cataract surgery on motor vehicle crash 37: 430-6.
involvement by older adults. JAMA 2002; 288: 841-9. 15. Marottoli RA, Mendes de Leon CF, Glass TA, et al. Driving
6. Owsley C, McGwin G Jr, Ball K. Vision impairment, eye dis- cessation and increased depressive symptoms: prospec-
ease, and injurious motor vehicle crashes in the elderly. Oph- tive evidence from the New Haven EPESE. J Am Geriatr Soc
thalmic Epidemiol 1998; 5: 101-13. 1997; 45: 202-6.
7. Owsley C, Stalvey BT, Wells J, Sloane ME, McGwin G Jr. Vi- 16. Ruckhofer J, Grabner G. Driving behavior of patients before
sual risk factors for crash involvement in older drivers with cataract operation - is an unlimited drivers license justifiable?
cataract. Arch Ophthalmol. 2001; 119: 881-7. Results of an analysis of 1,124 patients of the ophthalmology
8. Klein BEK, Klein R, Linton KLP. Prevalence of age-related department of a central hospital. Klin Monatsbl Augenheilkd
lens opacities in a population: the Beaver Dam Eye Study. 1998; 212: 106-10.
Ophthalmology 1992; 99: 546-52. 17. Chylack LT Jr, Wolfe JK, Singer DM, et al. The lens opacities
9. Mitchell P, Cumming RG, Attebo K, Panchapakesan J. Preva- classification system III. The Longitudinal Study of Cataract
lence of cataract in Australia. Ophthalmology 1997; 104: 581-8. Study Group. Arch Ophthalmol 1993; 111: 831-6.
10. Owsley C, Stalvey B, Wells J, Sloane ME. Older drivers and 18. Ferris FL, Kassoff A, Bresnick GH, Bailey IL. New visual acu-
ity charts for clinical research. Am J Ophthalmol 1982; 94: 31. Ijspeert JK, de Waard PWT, van den Berg TJTP, de Jong
91-6. PTVM. The intraocular straylight function in 129 healthy vol-
19. Pelli DG, Robson JG, Wilkins AJ. The design of a new letter unteers; dependence on angle, age and pigmentation. Vision
chart for measuring contrast sensitivity. Clin Vis Sci 1988; 2: Res 1990; 30: 699-707.
187-99. 32. Van den Berg TJTP, Ijspeert JK, de Waard PWT, Meire F.
20. Van den Berg TJTP, Coppens JE, Franssen L. New Approach Functional quantification of diaphany. Doc Ophthalmol 1990;
for Retinal Straylight Assessment: Compensation Compari- 75: 239-46.
son. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2005; 46: E-Abstract 4315. 33. Sarna T, Burke JM, Korytowski W, et al. Loss of melanin from
21. Franssen L, Coppens JC, van den Berg TJTP. Compensa- human RPE with aging: possible role of melanin photooxida-
tion comparison method for assessment of retinal straylight. tion. Exp Eye Res 2003; 76: 89-98.
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2006; 47: 768-76. 34. Van den Berg TJTP, Van Rijn LJ, Michael R, et al. Straylight ef-
22. Nischler C, Emesz M, Hufnagl C, et al. Driving habits of pa- fects with aging and lens extraction. Am J Ophthalmol 2007;
tients with glaucoma. Klin Monatsbl Augenheilkd 2005; 222: 144: 358-63.
1002-7. 35. Stifter E, Sacu S, Weghaupt H, et al. Reading performance
23. Emesz M, Egger SF, Nitsch S, Ruckhofer J, Hitzl W, Grabner depending on the type of cataract and its predictability on the
G. Automobile drivers with retinal diseases: a prospective visual outcome. J Cataract Refract Surg 2004; 30: 1259-67.
analysis. Klin Monatsbl Augenheilkd 2001; 218: 670-6. 36. Stifter E, Sacu S, Benesch T, Weghaupt H. Impairment of
24. Mangione CM, Lee PP, Gutierrez PR, et al. Development of visual acuity and reading performance and the relationship
the 25-item National Eye Institute Visual Function Question- with cataract type and density. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci
naire. Arch Ophthalmol 2001; 119: 1050-8. 2005; 46: 2071-5.
25. Mangione CM, Lee PP, Pitts J, et al. Psychometric properties 37. Stifter E, Sacu S, Weghaupt H. Functional vision with cata-
of the National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire racts of different morphologies: Comparative study. J Cata-
(NEI-VFQ). NEI-VFQ Field Test Investigators. Arch Ophthal- ract Refract Surg 2004; 30: 1883-91.
mol 1998; 116: 1496-504. 38. Maraini G, Rosmini F, Graziosi P, et al, and the Italian Ameri-
26. Kahn HA, Leibowitz HM, Ganlez JP, et al. The Framingham can Study Group. Influence of type and severity of pure forms
Eye Study: outline and major prevalence findings. Am J Epi- of age-related cataract on visual acuity and contrast sensitiv-
demiol 1977; 106: 17-41. ity. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1994; 35: 262-7.
27. Livingston PM, Carson CA, Stanislavsky YL, Lee SE, Guest 39. Rouhiainen P, Rouhiainen H, Salonen JT. Contrast sensitiv-
CS, Taylor HR. Methods for a population-based study of eye ity in different types of early lens opacities. Acta Ophthalmol
disease: the Melbourne visual impairment project. Ophthal- Scand 1996; 74: 379-83.
mic Epidemiol 1994; 1: 139-48. 40. Pau H. Cortical and subcapsular cataracts: Significance of
28. Van Rijn LJ, Nischler C, Gamer D, et al. Measurement of stray physical forces. Ophthalmologica. 2006; 220: 1-5.
light and glare: comparison of Nyktotest, Mesotest, stray 41. Tang D, Borchman D, Schwarz AK, et al. Light scattering
light meter, and computer implemented stray light meter. Br J of human lens vesicles in vitro. Exp Eye Res 2003; 76:
Ophthalmol 2005; 89: 345-51. 605-12.
29. Rubin GS, Adamsons IA, Stark WJ. Comparison of acuity, 42. De Waard PWT, Ijspeert JK, Van den Berg TJTP, De Jong
contrast sensitivity, and disability glare before and after cata- PTVM. Intraocular light scattering in age-related cataracts.
ract surgery. Arch Ophthalmol 1993; 111: 56-61. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1992; 33: 618-25.
30. Meacock WR, Spalton DJ, Boyce J, Marshall J. The effect 43. Blows S, Ameratunga S, Ivers RQ, Lo SK, Norton R. Risky
of posterior capsule opacification on visual function. Invest driving habits and motor vehicle driver injury. Accid Anal
Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2003; 44: 4665-9. Prev 2005; 37: 619-24.
on line
This paper has been selected to appear on the
EJOWEB page free of charge
www.eur-j-ophthalmol.com