Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
1
Overview of Steel Surface Preparation
H. William Hitzrot
64
Table 2. Surface Cleanliness Standards.
65
removing dirt and soil, oil and grease, chemical micrometer. These techniques are described in more
contaminants, mill scale, rust and paintall of which detail in the inspection chapter of this book.
require a different approach. It is important, therefore,
to thoroughly examine the steel surface and determine Environmental Impact on Surface
what surface preparation procedures will be required Preparation
to meet a given cleanliness level: Such factors as job location, presence of
Evidence of oil and grease (SSPC-SP 1) hazardous materials, and abrasive disposal can
Spot welding produced weld spatter and some rough influence the surface preparation method:
welds (SSPC-SP 2) If surface preparation occurs inside a production
Steel structure in an industrial area with evidence of facility, power-tool cleaning methods may be required
chemical contaminants on the surface. (SSPC-SP 1 to minimize disruptions.
water washing or steam cleaning) If the job is located in a residential area and the
Steel surface must be blast cleaned to meet a coating being removed contains hazardous materials,
commercial level of cleanliness. (SSPC-SP 6/NACE 3 containment is required during blast cleaning to
Commercial Blast Cleaning)6 minimize the environmental impact.
If abrasive disposal after blast cleaning is a problem,
By devising and following a surface prepara- use of a recyclable abrasive is dictated.
tion protocol, the job will proceed smoothly and
minimize future surface preparation-related problems. It is evident from these examples that job
location plays an important role in any surface
Surface Profile preparation process. Carefully review the surrounding
Generating a surface profile is a consequence environment before establishing a surface preparation
of any surface preparation method involving abrasive protocol.
blast cleaning. It is important to know the profile
requirements of the coating system to be applied to Summary
the blast-cleaned surface. For example, if the coating Because the life of a coating system depends
system requires a 2 mil profile, the blast cleaning on the quality of the surface preparation, it is essential
abrasive used should generate a 2 mil profile. Test to establish a surface preparation protocol that will
panels can be prepared prior to blasting to be certain meet the requirements of the subsequent coating
that a given abrasive media will generate the required system. The surface preparation protocol should begin
profile. with a careful examination of the entire project to
If surface preparation involves blast cleaning determine the answers to these questions:
to remove an existing coating system, remember that What pre-cleaning is required?
there is an existing blast cleaned profile under the Are there surface defects to be removed?
original coating. Subsequent blast cleaning to remove What mechanical cleaning methodsabrasive blast
the original coating will change but not remove that cleaning, high-pressure water, power toolswill be
original profile. Any new coating system should be required to accomplish the job?
compatible with the altered, potentially deeper profile What degree of SSPC specified surface cleanliness
of the reblast-cleaned surface. is required?
What type of abrasive or method of mechanical
Profile Measurement cleaning will clean the steel and generate sufficient
The two most commonly used methods for surface profile to meet the coating system require-
field measurement of surface profile of blast-cleaned ments?
steel are ASTM D 4417, Method A (comparator) and C Can the proposed surface preparation protocol
(replica tape).7 In Method A, the blasted steel surface comply with the environmental constraints of the job
is visually compared to standards prepared with location?
various profile depths. In Method C, a composite
plastic tape is impressed into the steel surface profile Once the surface preparation protocol is
forming a reverse image that is measured with a established, it is then time to begin the job.
66
References
1. Schwab, Lee K.; Drisko, Richard W. Relation of
Surface Profile to Coating Performance. In Corrosion
Control by Coatings; Henry Leidheiser, Jr., ed., NACE:
Houston, 1981.
2. SSPC-SP 1. Solvent Cleaning; SSPC: Pittsburgh.
3. SSPC-SP 12/NACE 5. Surface Preparation and
Cleaning of Steel and Other Hard Materials by High-
and Ultra High-Pressure Waterjetting Prior to
Recoating; SSPC: Pittsburgh and NACE: Houston.
4. SSPC-SP 2. Hand Tool Cleaning; SSPC: Pittsburgh.
5. SSPC-SP COM. Surface Preparation Commentary
for Steel and Concrete Substrates; SSPC: Pittsburgh.
6. SSPC-SP 6/NACE 3. Commercial Blast Cleaning;
SSPC: Pittsburgh and NACE: Houston.
7. ASTM D 4417. Test Method for Field Measurement
of Surface Profile of Blast Cleaned Steel; ASTM: West
Conshohocken, PA.
Acknowledgements
The author and SSPC gratefully acknowledge the
participation of Joe Brandon, Carl Mantegna, Hugh
Roper, and Don Sanchez in the peer review process
for this document.
H. William Hitzrot
Bill Hitzrot, prior to his retirement, was an active
member of SSPC for about 30 years, chair of the
abrasives committee and member of the SSPC Board
of Governors. He was also an active participant in the
Chesapeake Chapter of SSPC. Bill retired as vice
president of Chesapeake Specialty Products, a
manufacturer of steel abrasives and iron oxides for
industrial use. He remains active in SSPC assisting in
updating publications and training programs in the
areas of surface preparation and abrasives.
67