Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
Dr Mostafa Ghasemi
Email: mostafa.baboli@utp.edu.my
Ext:7375
Room: No.8, 2nd floor, Block J3
First Complication: Wellbore Storage
Wellbore Storage
Wellbore Storage
Figure 2
Wellbore Storage
Figure 3 shows the difference that
exists in the flow rate at the surface
and the flow rate at the sandface, or
perforations. There is a time delay
before the flow rate from the
reservoir equals the flow rate at the
surface. Essentially, this wellbore
storage effect causes the reservoir
flow rate to gradually, rather than
instantaneously, reach the surface
flow rate. It is important that we
incorporate or account for the
wellbore unloading when we
interpret the pressure/flow data Figure 3
collected during a well test.
Quiz: Wellbore Storage
Just as there is a delay in flow-rate response during the opening of a
well for a drawdown test, there is also a delay when a well is shut in
at the surface to begin a buildup test ( Figure 4 ).
In this case the surface flow stops instantaneously, while the sandface
flow gradually drops to zero. This condition is a second wellbore
storage effect that is often referred to as after flow.
Figure 4
Flow Regime
Dr Mostafa Ghasemi
Email: mostafa.baboli@utp.edu.my
Ext:7375
Room: No.8, 2nd floor, Block J3
Pseudo Steady state
Skin Effect
Skin Effect
Figure 5
Skin Effect
Figure 6
Damage caused by Production
Skin Effect
Skin is the term used to refer to the alteration of permeability that
exists near the wellbore.
The skin factor, s, is used to quantify the skin. If the well has been
damaged, there is an additional pressure drop at the wellbore for a
given flow rate and the skin factor is positive. If the well has been
stimulated and the pressure drop at the wellbore has been decreased,
the skin factor is negative.
We should point out that, unlike well-bore storage, which has an effect
only on the early data, the skin effect is constant throughout a well test
(unless the skin is a function of flow rate). A supplemental positive or
negative pressure drop caused by the skin remains throughout the test.
Its magnitude will change as the flow rate changes.
Drawdown Test- No Damage
Reasons for Positive Skin
Damaged perforations
Gravel Pack
Partial completion
Pre-Acid Treatment Post-Acid Treatment
Perforation Damage Completion Damage
Reasons for Negative Skin
Acidizing
Hydraulic Fracturing
Natural Fractures
Solution Incorporating Skin
Drawdown Test
Ei function solution
Ei -function solution (line-source solution) is first proposed by Matthews and Russell in
1967. It is based on the following assumptions:
Infinite acting reservoir, i.e., the reservoir is infinite in size.
The well is producing at a constant flow rate.
The reservoir is at a uniform pressure, , when production begins.
The solution has the following form:
70.6 948 2
, = + (1)
(3)
For the bottomhole flowing pressure, i.e., @r= , at any time, Eq. 3
can be rewritten as:
p wf pi
162.6Qo Bo o kt
log
3.23 (4)
o ct rw
2
kh
The skin effect
Skin due to damage Skin due to stimulation
(ks > k)
(ks < k)
The skin effect contd
Where
141.2
= (5)
= additional pressure drop due to skin effect
S= skin factor
Skin factor (S) is a dimensionless variable used to quantify the magnitude of skin effect.
Incorporating skin into the Ei-Function solution
For rw r rs
70.6 948 2
, = + 2
For r > rs
70.6 948 2
, = +
For r=rw
70.6 948 2
= + 2
Log approximation to the Ei-Function
For r=rw
162.6
= 2 3.23 + 0.8686
Skin and permeability
Skin and permeability contd
2 1
=
log 2 log(1 )
Question 1
=4412 psi h= 69 ft
=0.8 cp =3.9%
=0.198 ft = 17e-6 psi-1
B=1.136 bbl/STB
Solution
1
= 1.151 + 3.23
2
Dr Mostafa Ghasemi
Email: mostafa.baboli@utp.edu.my
Ext:7375
Room: No.8, 2nd floor, Block J3
Well Testing and the Ideal Reservoir
Model
A test that involves opening the well to flow at a constant rate is called
a drawdown test. The pressure response is a form of pressure
transient, and our interpretation of it comprises one aspect of
pressure transient analysis.
If we solve the equations that describe transient radial flow into the
wellbore for our "ideal" reservoir model, it is then possible to specify
the pressure distribution in our reservoir as a function of time.
Reservoir Pressure Response During a Drawdown
Test
Radius of Investigation
1
kot 2
ri
948 o c t
Reservoir Pressure Response During a Drawdown
Test
Figure 2
Reservoir Pressure Response During a Drawdown
Test
There are two important conclusions that can be drawn from this information: first,
we note that if a well test is intended to investigate a certain distance into the
reservoir, the required duration of the test will depend upon the relative values of
permeability, fluid viscosity, porosity, and total compressibility.
Equation 1 implies that if the mobility of one reservoir is five times less than that of
another, the former must be tested 5 times longer if the same radius is to be
investigated in both cases. This assumes, of course, that the porosity and fluid
compressibility are the same in both cases.
Reservoir Pressure Response During a Drawdown Test
The second conclusion we may draw for our ideal reservoir system is
that the radius of investigation does not depend upon the production
rate.
The pressure transient will move outward to the same distance in the
same period of time whether the production rate is high or low. (The
rate affects only the magnitude of the pressure response.)
Let us consider the base case ( Figure 1 ) and see what happens as we
change one variable at a time. The results are given in Figure 3 (The
effect of mobility on pressure transients during a drawdown test) and
Figure 4 (The effect of production rate on pressure transients during a
drawdown test).
Reservoir Pressure Response During a
Drawdown Test
Figure 3
Reservoir Pressure Response During a
Drawdown Test
Figure 4
Pressure Transients During a
Drawdown Test in a Finite Reservoir
It is helpful to see how the
pressure profiles change in a
reservoir that is not "infinite." To
do so we must modify our
theoretical model to show a finite
volume reservoir with an
impermeable barrier. Let us use an
enclosing no-flow outer boundary
with an outer radius of re. No flow
takes place across this outer
radius. In Figure 5 (The effect of a
finite reservoir outer boundary on
pressure transients)
Figure 5
Pressure Transients During a Drawdown Test in a
Finite Reservoir
we see that the presence of a finite outer boundary with an outer radius
of re will not affect the pressure profile until the radius of investigation
reaches re, but that thereafter the pressure profile drops more rapidly.
This occurs because, in the finite case, all of the production must
come from the finite reservoir volume.
Pressure Transients During a Drawdown Test in a Finite Reservoir
Prior to the pressure transient reaching the finite outer boundary, we have
what is referred to as transient flow conditions.
Reservoir Pressure Response During a Drawdown-
Buildup Test Sequence
The pressure distribution
in the reservoir is shown
in Figure 8 . Note that the
well is shut in at t = t4 and
that the pressure builds up
thereafter. In buildup
tests, except for the early
influence of decaying well
rates on pressure
response, the majority of
test data relate to a
condition where the rate is
zero and thus not
changing. Figure 8
Injectivity and Fall off Tests
Figure 9
Early, Middle and Late Time
Pressure Behavior
Dr Mostafa Ghasemi
Email: mostafa.baboli@utp.edu.my
Ext:7375
Room: No.8, 2nd floor, Block J3
Early, Middle and Late Time Pressure Behavior
Typical drawdown test pressure behavior
Early time flow is dominated by wellbore storage.
Middle time (transient) flow is a period where the
reservoir act as an infinite. i.e. a semilog plot of
Pwf versus t is a straight line which can be used
to determine permeability.
Late time flow is a flow period where the
pressure data is dominated by boundary effects.
Can be used to calculate the size and shape of
the reservoir.
Early time region (ETR) pressure behavior
During drawdown During buildup
Early time region (ETR) pressure behavior
Falling/rising fluid
level
1/
Falling/risin
g fluid level
Early time region (ETR) pressure behavior
Falling/rising
fluid level
Effect of wellbore storage on pressure
Example 2: Wellbore storage calculation
The well is 2600 ft deep and has 6.625, 24lb/ft casing (5.921 ID). The bottomhole pressure is
1690 psi. If the well is filled with water ( = 4 106 1 ). What is the wellbore storage
coefficient?
Solution:
For fluid filled wellbore
=
=
2 2
2
5.921 1
= = = = 0.191 2
2 2 144
6 3
3
= 497.154 4 10 = 1.989 10
= 3.542 104
Wellbore storage from pressure transient test data
(psi)
Unit slope
period of the test line
=
24
Where = for drawdown and
= @=0 for buildup
10000 . .
= =
1000 = . /
p, psi
100
(0.045 hrs, 100
psi)
10
1
0.01 0.1 1 10 100
, hrs
Middle time region (MTR) pressure behavior
During this period, the reservoir is producing fluids, and pressure versus time data contains reservoir
information.
The straight line on semilog graph, whose slope is related to effective permeability of the flowing
phase, usually occurs during this period.
The straight line is called the correct semilog straight line
Late time region (LTR) pressure behavior
0.234 162.6
= 2 log + 0.351 + 0.869
Late time region (LTR) pressure behavior
0.234
=
0.234
= ( 3 )
The time to reach pseudo steady-state in a cylindrical reservoir can
be estimated from:
1190 2
= (hr)
ETR, MTR and LTR pressure behavior
0.234 162.6
= 2 log + 0.351 + 0.869
=
24
162.6
= 3.23 + 0.869
2