Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
TI Journals
ISSN
International Journal of Economy, Management and Social Sciences 2306-7276
www.tijournals.com
2013 Int. j. econ. manag. soc. sci. All rights reserved for TI Journals.
1. Introduction
Creation value of people and institutions that are looking for their interests in the organizations plays a basic role in managing new
organizations. Among beneficiaries, shareholders are in special situation, as their basic role in entrepreneurship and forming the institute
and risk taking. The value is made for the shareholders, through valuing for other beneficiaries of the organization; and management art is
incorporating and giving a balance to Creation value for a group of beneficiaries, in a way that the shareholders will get their expected
values and find continuing to invest in the firm suitable, finally [3]. Therefore, investors and financial managers expect to obtain the
information related to benefits, cash status of the institute, income potential, suitable growth if the firm and risk analysis though reliable
measure; in a way that choosing a criterion to evaluate the suitable performance and controlling the firm and gaining the goals of the firm
by using the criterion leads to make evaluating the performance, suitably, important.
So, important accounting variables like sale, profit and percentage of profit to sale have been used in many firms traditionally, to evaluate
the firm performance. Though these measures are used practically, but are not suitable measure to evaluate managers performance; as a
section profit relates to investing rate, closely; and none of these traditional methods consider investing price [2]. Since the measure based
on accounting profit are manipulating, most analysts claim that the measure based on cash flow are less distorting, so that cash flows are
used in current valuation model of cash flow popularly. In next sections, new models based on FCF are introduced.
The firms FCF represents the amount of cash flow available to investorsthe providers of debt (creditors) and ownersafter the firm has
met all operating needs and paid for investments in net fixed assets and net current assets. It is called free not because it is without cost
* Corresponding author.
Email address: meysamkaviani@gmail.com
230 Meysam Kaviani et al.
Int ernational Journal of Ec onomy, Mana ge me nt and Soci al Sc iences , 2(6) June 2013
but because it is available to investors. It represents the summation of the net amount of cash flow available to creditors and owners
during the period. Free cash flow can be defined by Equation 2.
The net fixed asset investment (NFAI) can be calculated as shown in Equation 3.
Looking at Equation 3, we can see that if the depreciation during a year is less than the decrease during that year in net fixed assets, the
NFAI would be negative. A negative NFAI represents a net cash inflow attributable to the fact that the firm sold more assets than it
acquired during the year. The final variable in the FCF equation, net current asset investment (NCAI), represents the net investment made
by the firm in its current assets.
Net refers to the difference between current assets and spontaneous current liabilities, which typically comprise accounts payable and
accruals. (Because they are a negotiated source of short-term financing, notes payable are not included in the NCAI calculation. Instead,
they serve as a creditor claim on the firms FCF.) Equation 4 shows the NCAI calculation [5].
NCAI=Change in current assets - Change in spontaneous current liabilities (Accounts payable +Accruals) (4)
When using the FCFF, all inputs have to be based on accounting figures that are calculated before any interest payments are paid out to the
debt holders. The FCFE in contrast uses figures from which interest payments have already been deducted. Applying the FCFF as base for
the analysis will result in the enterprise value of the firm, using the FCFE will give the equity value. Since an acquirer usually takes over all
liabilities, debt and equity, the FCFF is more relevant than the equity approach [4] .
The basic idea is that we can arrive at FCFF by starting with one of four different financial statement items (net income, EBIT, EBITDA, or
CFO) and then making the appropriate adjustments. Then we can calculate FCFE from FCFF or by starting with net income or CFO.
Calculating FCFF from net income. FCFF is calculated from net income as:
Where:
NI = net income
NCC = noncash charge
Int = interest expense
FCInv = fixed capital investment (capital expenditure)
WCInv = working capital investment
Calculating FCFF from EBIT. FCFF can also be calculated from earnings before interest and taxes (EBIT):
Where:
EBIT = earnings before interest and taxes
Dep = depreciation
Calculating FCFF from EBITDA. We can also start with earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization (EBITDA) to arrive
at FCFF:
FCFF= [EBITDA (1-tax rate)] + (Dep tax rate) - FCInv WCInv (7)
Where:
EBITDA= earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization
Valuation of Firm through CVFCFF and CVFCFE as New Models Based on Free Cash Flow 231
Internat ional Jour nal of Economy, Mana ge ment and Social Sciences , 2(6) June 2013
Calculating FCFF from CFO. At last, FCFF can also be estimated by starting with CFO from the statement of cash flows:
Where:
CFO = cash flow from Operating
Calculating FCFE from FCFF. Calculating FCFE is easy once we have FCFF:
Calculating FCFE from Net Income. We can also calculate FCFE from net income by making some of the usual adjustments. The two
differences between this FCFE from net income formula and the FCFF from net income formula are (1) after-tax interest expense is
NOT added back and (2) net borrowing is added back.
Calculating FCFE from CFO. Finally, we can calculate FCFE from CFO by subtracting out fixed capital investment (which reduces cash
available to shareholders) and adding back net borrowing (which increases the cash available to shareholders).
The weighted average cost of capital is the required return on the firms assets. Its a weighted average of the required return on common
equity and the after-tax required return on debt.
Required Return to Equity (also called cost of Equity) is the Return that Shareholders expect to obtain in order to feel sufficiently
remunerated. The Required Return to Equity depends on the interest rates of long-term treasury bonds and the firms risk
The required return on equity is the sum of the interest rate of long-term Treasury bonds plus a quantity that is usually called the firms risk
premium:
Or Required Return to Equity is calculated through balanced models like Capital Asset Pricing Model (CAPM) and Arbitrage Pricing
Theory (APT).
For example, you can see the value of the firm through Single-Stage model of FCFE and FCFF, which states the difference of two
equations with various interest rates.
The WACC is the weighted average of the rates of return required by each of the capital suppliers (usually just equity and debt). The
WACC is one of the most important input factors in the DCF model. Small changes in the WACC will cause large changes in the firm
value. The WACC is calculated by weighting the sources of capital according to the firms financial structure and then multiplying them
with their costs. Therefore the formula for the WACC calculation is [4] :
FCFE1 FCFE 0 (1 g )
Value of the Equity (14)
rg rg
Where:
FCFE1 = expected free cash flow to equity in one year
FCFE0 = starting level of FCFE
g = constant expected growth rate in FCFE
r = required return on equity
Some investors knows FCF (that is provided by considering investment expenditures and other necessary ones for continuing the activity)
as the most accurate measure for yield, therefore FCF yield is preferred to share return. So that, through replacing FCF yield per share is
measured by FCFE and FCFF to Free Cash Flow to Firm Yield and Free Cash Flow to Equity Yield.
Effective variables in this ration are similar to P/E. Changing the growth rate in FCF and the risk of cash flow fluctuations in a time space
should be considered as an essential factor. According to the relation between FCFE and FCFF and its nature to Cash Flow from Operating
of the firm, FCF can be used in the equation.
Therefore, to create the value in a time space based on FCFE and FCFF models, the yields of free cash flow to firm and free cash flow to
equity should be more than cost of capital and cost of equity in the firm, respectively; so the created value from the models based on FCF
(created value of the firm in one year) is obtained when the firm performance increases more than expected. This model has been given by
Meysam Kaviani (2013) and is calculated through following equations:
And also:
CVFCFE= EMVt [(FCFE t+1/ EMVt) r)] (20)
Or
CVFCFE= FCFE t+1 (EMVt r) (21)
Where:
CVFCFE = Created Value from Free Cash Flow to Equity
EMVt = Equity Market Value at the beginning of the year
FCFEt+1 = Free Cash Flow to Equity in one year
r = Required Return to Equity
7. Conclusion
By looking at the basis of performance evaluation, it is found that the necessity to use more accurate measure is felt more than before, while
scientific progresses and human evolution can be seen; in a way that investors and financial managers expect to investigate the information
about real profit of the institute, cash state of the institute currently and in future, revenue potential, sustainable development of the firm and
risk analysis through reliable measure, nowadays. Therefore, new measures have been proposed for evaluating the performance that can
cover common weaknesses in last measure and be a reliable evaluation tool in decision making by investors.
In this article, giving the models based in FCF can eliminate the distorting effects of the measure based in profit and it is expected that they
are examined with other evaluating measure in traditional and novel performance to make practical, financial and investment decision, in
various studies.
References
[1] Bhundia, A. (2012). A comparative study between free cash flows and earnings management. Business Intelligence Journal, Vol.5 No.1, 123-29.
[2] Kaviani, M. (2012). "Study of and explain the relationship between the Financial Leverage and new Performance Metrics (EVA, MVA, REVA, SVA,
CVA): Evidence from Automotive Industry Tehran Stock Exchange". Thesis of financial management, Islamic Azad University, Science and Research
Branch, Tehran, Iran.
[3] Nikoomaram, H. & Asgari, M.R. (2009). Proposing a Model for Predicting Tehran Stock Exchange Output Using REVA, EVA, EP and EPS metrics.
http://www.sid.ir.
[4] Steiger F. (2008). The Validity of Firm Valuation Using Discounted Cash Flow Methods Seminar Paper, 1-25.
[5] www.aw.com/gitman
[6] http://www.investopedia.com