Sei sulla pagina 1di 20




By Wilson Ometan. B.A. Hons, (Dipl. IT) London


ADVICE TO THE READER: This article has 27 pages in length; the reader should take absolute
patience to read this resource material. It should be read more than once to get the literal and cultural
meanings attached to the names and storyline. I will welcome criticisms and questions from sane,
reasonable, Inquiring and genuine minds to illuminate where necessary.

This is a rejoinder to Reverend Dr. Charles E. Osume’s attack on me for daring to say; in my article
titled, “The origin of Okpe Ethnic group controversy” that Okpe people are Urhobo. I sympathize with
Uncle Reverend Osume’s position because he is caught between myth (Religion) and reality & his
moral entrepreneurship is lost in his bent to remove Okpe from Urhobo, a decision informed by racism.

This article is also an attempt to disabuse the minds of Urhobo people who think and believe that they
are subservient to other tribes; for, lacking original history makes kings believe that they are inferior.

It is true that if a people are unable to unearth their history; others will do it for them and this is why
the oldest book of Esiri (Osiris), also known as book of Revelation, aptly revealed in chapter two verse
nine, (Rev. 2:9) that those who call themselves Jews are not Jews. In the same vain; people who claim
to be royals from the beginning of time, when properly investigated one can discover that they were not
(I’m not referring to Okpe here).

The Urhobo of today; based on collective ignorance believed that they are a small ethnic group whose
ancestors contributed little to the civilisation of the world and therefore thoughts are abound as
conquered people in the small map of Nigeria. To the contrary. Urhobo history is what rules the world
today to my surprise after research. Indeed Urhobo and Yoruba are the greatest tribes that brought
civilisation to the world. This is the reality and no myth.

It becomes injurious to hear that; some parts of Urhobo are bent on tarnishing her name in the mud in
the fashion of her past conquerors as many nations have done to themselves.

My grouse with the Okpe scholars have been the minimalist grouping of us (Okpe) under Benin of the
seventeen century history and thereby advertising us short. The basing of our lineage ancestry of King
Esezi of seventeen century is too modern and places us as new kingdom with no father hence I say now
that the first Okpe king, known in history was the second king of ancient Egypt called MENA before
the zero dynasty of 3150 BC, being the second king after Esiri (Greeks changed it to Osiris). A further
investigation is needed to unravel this hidden and suppressed history. The Greeks also changed Mena’s
name to menes. I know these names to be Urhobo i.e. Esiri and Mena because of the antecedents of the
culture of our people and their names stored in my genetic memory bank. When you consider the name
Lemuria; a name when pronounced in Urhobo “Nemuria”, a serpent people of a dissolved civilisation,
then you will agree with me that they are Urhobo people. For instance the image which symbolises this
Nemuria Island is a snake (serpent) which looks at its tail when it makes a gesture to eat it (the tail).
Literally; this is the movement of the sun which rises in the morning and dies in the evening, thereby
forming a circle of the Zero, of which is the shape of the sun. The sun on its own is a nuclear reactor
(See and click on ATUMU (ATOM: First to be: In Creation), ATAMU
where said to have annihilated themselves by an explosion or implosion in the distant past. The Niger
Delta and some West African countries are a place where the serpent is worshipped till today. This is
not all about witch-craft but the worship of the true God; a religion which had been suppressed, stolen
and transformed to be Christianity and Islam today in the form of Ekpeti-Ra (petra) that is the rock of
the church. I leave more of this to some other write-ups.

In this order; there was Nemuria (Lemuria), Atlantis islands and Ancient Egypt civilisations. I found
out that these civilisations’ had the culture of Urhobo and for lack of history (not lack of it) in Urhobo,
we cannot move forward because there are no role models to emulate but mundane and forged
historiography of others who are part of us. Where-as our ancestors have excelled and ruled the world
before, some of their records were destroyed and others usurped to make way for emperors, empires,
empirical data, Christianity and Islam. For instance; Esiri’s (Osiris, also known as Aesa, Assa, Asa, Esa
etc.) and Uroh’s (Horus) characteristics were used for the invention of Christianity. Esiri married his
Sister Isi (gene of Isi, Genesis), was killed by Seth his brother (Greek Typhon) because of jealousy. “At
the time of his death; he and Isi had no child but Isi who was a virgin made him impregnate her while
dead by immaculate conception, and this is re-echoed in Christianity. Their offspring was named Uroh
(Penis). A name that was changed to Horu and pluralized to Horus. Surprisingly; all the characteristics
of Uroh was used for Jesus. Please see ( (Igbo) priest and
prophet in the Bible) for full details. And Uroh (Horus) was raised secretly in the marshes of the Nile
Delta to protect him from his evil uncle Seth” (Historical deception: the untold story of Ancient Egypt,
Moustafa Gadalla, p55, some are my emphassis). So was Jesus who was raised in hiding from King
Herod. Indeed, the Greek number four alphabet is the triangle representing the Pyramid and the number
4 is known as Ene in Uvwie, an Urhobo ethnic group. Today, we still live in the Niger Delta away from
the Delta of the Nile River with the Itsekiri who lived in Goshen of the Nile. Remember, Aesa or Esa is
the Trinitiy and Divinity of Esiri, Horus and Isi which represents Esiri for root, Uroh in the middle and
Isi for Head. Three Chakras. No coincidence please we built the Pyramids. Furthermore, Aesa (Esiri,
Horus, Asa, Esa,) was resurrected as a soul to rule and judge in the nether land (ibid). The fact is, this
same history can be seen in many books of Ancient Egypt about Esiri’s resurrection and judgement of
the world. Besides, the Muslims know Jesus as Issa (Essa). But do we see anything like this in
Christianity some six-ten thousand (6000-10.000) years after? Yes of course; this is where the fear of
heavenly world is placed, Urhobo belief system. This reminds me of an utterance accredited to an
Urhobo prolific writer & Author on a BBC TV programme where he is at sea with his own musing that
“he is unable to find his own tribal gods” some four to five years ago. I was dumbfounded and
scandalised. Urhobo gods are everywhere in their symbols.

Before proceeding to compare the so-called mythical creation stories by three ethnic groups of the
World; I will like to say that, efforts had been made by Governments, tribes and Religions to distort, re-
edit, copy and obfuscate the Egyptian history. In this case, Greece and the State of Israel stands out
boldly as people who have usurped the Egyptian history. When I explain some of the god names of
Ancient Egypt in the world creation story, you will be left with no doubt as to the origin and
authenticity of these names. But nonetheless, these people should be commended for the translation
from hieroglyphs to other languages and English for our eyes to see today though others tried to
destroy all our history but never knew some facts will filter out one day to contradict their story line of
the Bible.


The Ancient creation story of the world according to Ancient Egyptians who were Urhobos states that;
the world began as a watery mass called “Nun” (which from our Urhobo language is ENUN for mouth)
from which the sun and or tongue “Atum” (Urhobo for ATUMU, i.e. first to stand or be) came out on a
mound. Atum then begot the deities of Shu (Urhobo expression for surprise and the onomatopoeia for
sneeze) the god of Air, and “Tephnut” (Urhobo for Otavenu, i.e. word and mouth) which is moisture.
And these in-turn begat “Keb” (Kebe, ground on which we plant ebe, trees and fruits, shrubs etc) which
is the earth. And “Nut” (Enute, Urhobo for reach up) the sky deity. From the deity of Enute (also
Kenute) we also got Canoe of the English word for small boat because the zodiac of Kenute goddess
resembles’ a small boat.

Kebe and Enute (Earth and Sky deities respectively) then went on to produce our first Ancestor King
and Queen in Ancient Egypt known as Esiri and Isi (Osiris and Isis, in pluralized form). Including Set
and Nephthys (I’m yet to crack who Set and Nephthys are). (The Gods of the Egyptians, E.A. Wallis
Bulge p308) also ( History of Urhobo.htm) [Some are my

It is obvious that the story makes sense in relation to the names and meanings in Urhobo and no other
tribe in the world.


YORUBA VERSION: Olodumare. Yoruba God of creation sent Orumila down on earth with a rooster
which carries some quantity of sand in its claws when the earth was in void and water. In the mist of
this vast water, Orumila using the rooster spread the sand to form land. Oduduwa, the Ancestor of the
Yoruba race had eight children who went to form various communities before he came down to earth
on a chain from the sky. The chain is probably the rainbow.

BENIN VERSION: Osanobuah. Benin God of Creation sent three Sons to populate the world in the
mist of vast water with a tree in the middle and a hornbill bird perched on it. These children has
different skills chosen by the first two which include magical skills, wealth management respectively
and the last chose a snail shell by the guidance of the hornbill [ Interestingly, a dramatic weather
change during the end of the ice age between 15,000 and 10,000BCE left many sea shells in the
Egyptian desert ](My emphasis). As the children were travelling through space to earth, the youngest
and bearer of the shell release its content with stream of endless sand to form land. And God came
down with a chain from the sky.

As we can see from above, the Yoruba and the Benin version mimic one another and an indication that
they are of one origin i.e. Jacob and Oduduwa, Izoduwa, Asaduwa. But Asa, Aesa is an element of
Asaduwa which means Aesa, Asa or Essa has reached the world. Are we not all children of the same
trinity of Asa, Aesa etc.? On the other hand, the Ancient Egyptian Creation narratives of the world is
pure Urhobo. Whoever argues with this should read the legends of the Gods by E.A. Wallis Budge. It is

Anyway, Esiri and Isi then begat Uroh (Horus) thereby forming the trininty of Esa, Aesa or Ausar who
will judge the world [Historical deception: the untold story of Ancient Egypt, Moustafa Gadalla, page
40]. Add “H” to Ausar and you get Hausar.

In the same vein add the roman figure of one hundred i.e. “C” to Aesar and you get Caesar. Also; Czar
is a derivative of Aesar. Uroh was changed to Horus and Hours while the children of Oran, Ra i.e.
Emora or Amora was changed to Rome or Roma respectively {I will pay $500 to any person that finds
these names otherwise}. And so was Genesis from Gene of Isi, Geneva from Gene of Eva (Okpe) and
Paris from Opar (Opo, Opa, stick) of Isi. For instance, two French Authors wrote that,

“The name Gomorrah in hebrew is Amora which means people [Children] of Ra or people of Pharaoh”
(Secrets of the Exodus, Messod and Roger Sabbah, page 71).

Also, the name Osarsephe, is Egyptian which every Priest or King after going through an initiation is
known as Osarsephe (Osesephe: is father-Esiri who generates wealth). The funerary papyrus of Iouiya,
(Eyuya, Juya,[this is suffer], Joseph) explains that he was presented with a gold chain and he was the
bearer of the Seal of lower Egypt. Soon after he was presented with this office, he became known as
Sephe. This is why we have him as Yusephe which became Yuseph (Yoruba rendition) and Joseph
(Hebrew rendition) (The Hebrew Pharaohs of Egypt, Ahmed Osman, page 119, and also Genesis 41:42,
some are my emphasis). In other words, Joseph the fourth generation of Abraham has obtained a
Chieftaincy title from the Kingdom of Esau (Esiri) and taking an oath of office with the name of Asa,
Osa, Ose (Esiri) etc. thereby completing the four generation which Abram said his Children will be in
bondage in Egypt. Truly, the 18th Dynasty saw the end of Yoruba rule in Ancient Egypt when General
Horemhobo took over.

It was probably the same Isi the wife and sister of Esiri that Reverend Dr. C. Osume is referring to as
Izu of Okpe Nationhood. If Assa can be changed to Essa, Asa, Aesa, Ausa, Ausar and Hausar etc, Isi
too can be referred to as Isis, Auset, Izu and Eva by any ethnic group emanating from her. An indication
denoting children of one mother or rather, other ethnic groups can adopt her name as their mother
which is exactly what genesis has accomplished today. Gene of Isi.

Furthermore, Reverend Dr. Osume’s pandering to Benin does not hold water because he failed to tell us
the link apart from Okpe being prince and Igboze this Igboze that. He should know that during the
Coronation of the present Oba of Benin probably in 1979, the Oba traveled the length and breadth of
Nigeria in a thank you tour but did he travel to Okpe land? If you are so related and valued at such, he
will come to you as equals and related people.

The Benins speaks a variant of Urhobo mixed with Yoruba. This is so because we owned the Land of
Aka until we were driven out. Therefore, the Benin language is bound to reflect Urhobo just like the
Igbo person domiciled in Lagos and of course he will learn to speak Yoruba to do his business. Perhaps
I should refer Dr. C. Osume to a News blog of where Dr. Nowa Omoigui wrote to messr
Benjamin, Victor, Rita and Cynthia regarding matters of seniority in Esan land where the writer
consulted late Chief Orosaye’s book: History of Ancient Benin Kingdom and Empire-pages 31-33. In
the history-account, Okpe was not mentioned except Urhobo and Amon (Amen). I thought this history
is suspect because of its empirical data Dr. Osume craves for and also did not mention Egypt where the
Urhobos originate from but Sudan. I will re-iterate here that the Urhobos did not come from Sudan but
the Yoruba did. They are the true Israelites whom Jakob their ancestral father reconciled with Esau
who was already established in Egypt and the Benins are the first Children of Jakob (Israel). I stand to
be corrected. The wrestling engagement of Jakob and a stranger spirit which disjointed his thigh is
nothing more but his initiation in the mystery school in Egypt.

To further clear the confusion that the Benin came from Sudan and Egypt, Benjamin Imhonde asked
Nowa of the futility of not finding any evidence of Benin culture in the Sudan and Egypt Valley. Nowa
started his explanation using the mythological tradition of God-Osanobua using the snail shell to
create the first land. He is making reference inadvertently to the dramatic weather change during the
end of the ice age between 15,000 and 10,000BCE which left many sea shells in the Egyptian desert
thereby denoting some guesswork of the period in time when the Yoruba went to Egypt starting from
Abram and later Jakob. Egypt story of world Creation on the other hand is the oldest in civilsation.

The Benin name for God is Osonobua, whilst in Urhobo is Osonobrughwe.

The Very Reverend, Professor S.U. Erivwo gave an insight in the name we accord our God thus:

“Oso-no-bruwhe had been suggested to be a Benin name, or corruption of Edo Osanobua. But this may
or may not be so. If it were a borrowing from Benin or a corruption of the Benin Osanobua with which
it appears to be clearly related, then the meaning attaching to Osanobua would have to be given to
Osonobruwhe since according to E.B. Idowu, Osanobua means Asa (compare Yoruba Orisa) who holds
and sustains the universe, this same meaning might have to be given to the Urhobo Osonobruwhe”
(Traditional Religion and Christianity on Nigeria: The Urhobo people, Very Reverend, Professor S.U.
Erivwo, page 11, some are my emphassis).

Indeed, Asa which was mentioned by Idowu is the same Aesa, Aesar, Assa and Essa which I have
explained elsewhere in this write-up.

The historical theft of Esiri’s heritage also known as Aesa, Assa and Asa etc. is dumb-founding. Almost
every civilization embraced Esiri in either Religious or Secular matters. For instance; in the Bible he is
known as Esau because he promised to kill his brother Jacob when the latter cheated and named him
ESHU. You will get Esau when the “H” in ESHU is crowned to be “A”. But where-as the benevolent
Urhobo deity is given “ETCHE” as an appellation and symbol, the bad and evil deity is known as
“ETCHU”. The antecedents of the Yoruba is known in the pronunciation of Urhobo as Usobo. Is it not
also convenient to call ETCHU as ESHU? The changing of Eshu to Esau was the handwork of the
Hebrew re-writers also known as redactors.
This history of Assa, Asa, Esa, Aesa, Aesar etc. was deliberately left out in the kingship of Egypt and
was used to create Christianity as we find it in the biblical history of Jesus (Iyesuwa) and his brother
Chrestus (Omatie). Iyesuwa disciples were known as Essa-Ene (Essenes) which means Essa for three
(3) and Ene meaning four (4). 3 times 4 equal 12 disciples. That is the trinity of Esiri, Horus and Isi
multiplied by four of Iyesuwa, Omatie, Mariamune and Tiberius which gives the full strength of
spiritual power. This name Asa or Assa also reflects the meaning that the Urhobo God lives or stays in
Asa (“Place” called the sky). And He will Brughwe (appropriate) wealth or blessings to all non sinning
people on earth. Osa or Oso no Brughwe therefore is the God that appropriate wealth and blessings to

Okpe people also know and call God Osonobrughwe. Not only that, the Okpe also agrees with other
Urhobo ethnic groups that God resides up there in the sky which is Ekete (Akete). But to my surprise,
Akete is also indicative of high horizon (Akhet, Akhete) in Ancient Egypt. Or taken from another
perspective of the Very Reverend Erivwo,

“when they describe the horizon as Asa Oghene de vwobototo, i.e. where God torches the earth” (Ibid
page 14).

The link here is Akete, Ekete, Asa etc. all meaning the same Urhobo vernacular name for God’s place
in the sky and these shows our common root (Esiri).

The Okpe ethnic group are of Urhobo Origin judging from the fact that

they originate from Esiri, Isi and Uroh. And many kings in Ancient Egypt including Horemhobo
(Oremhobo) inherited the name Esiri or Uroh and it is from these names i.e. “Uroh and Oremhobo”
Urhobo came forth. Other well meaning people of Urhobo; for example Reverend Vincent
Edafejirhaye of the Agape Gospel Mission of Orerokpe agrees with me in the preface of “The origin of
Urhobo Nation of Federal Republic of Nigeria by David Ejoor” that the Urhobo Nation comprises of
twenty two (22) kingdoms and Okpe is listed as number fifteen (15).

We are not stupid with using history as some myth that raises its head as a monster to destroy its
children. On the contrary, history is to teach mankind to emulate their ancestors, educate them of their
ancestral exploits, developments and inventions. Where ugly in history is found, mistakes are corrected
to prevent such happening again to move forward. Historical Education should bind us together but not
divide us.

So far, I have been objective in giving the accounts of other historians and commentators alike. Some
of these historians have taken our history as theirs especially the Europeans and Americans and this is
because, if you don’t write your history others will do so for you. Africans themselves does not help
matters in evaluating the African history. What we hear from our African writers is empirical data to
determine the African History written by Africans which is self doubt and pity. The ardent self doubting
African writer needs the white-colour cosmetic make-up to authenticate his own history. A metaphoric
haircut to constantly measure his mental capability and spiritual helplessness. I feel sorry for them. For
me, If I should wake up next morning to receive a phone call from an Okpe King in 200 BC, his
language will not be confusing to me. It is the same Urhobo language with variations here and there.
Neither will I be at sea by his picture, statue, names of people and places, objects used for Chieftaincy
traditions and rituals etc. presented to me in museums and other places in foreign lands. This is why I
am not in the hue of those who cannot read their history along the lines. In other words, I do not follow
follow, thereby relying on empirical data to control their thinking and ultimately for the purpose of
economic capital of the empire of religion. For, religion has killed many humans on earth than any
other causes. Be that as it may, academics, Scholars, academicians and other professionals among us
who are in the fields of archaeology, astrology and linguistics should do their best to renew their
knowledge of ancient Egypt to authenticate and correct the history and forgery heaped on African


Esau or Esiri lineage can be seen in the book of Genesis 36 where it is said that he married up to three
wives who gave him multitude of children known as dukes. But if these children were dukes; it is then
correct to believe that Jacob (Uyakoba, Yakoob, Yakubal etc) was a king but nothing in the Bible
indicates such events happening. On the other hand, it is safe to surmise that Esau was a king but
because the thieves of history wants these records for themselves, the authentic history was turned on
its head and deliberately misappropriated anachronistically to other tribes, and in place of Esiri, Esau,
they placed Mena (Greek Menes). The latter is the truth because in Egypt, the culture of the Kings
(Pharaohs) is to name the great Pyramid after an epoc-making King. Such culture reflects in naming the
Pyramid in the time of Esiri, Akhenaten and Horemhobo. For Esiri period, it was Seir. The clever guys
merely brought the “E” in Esiri to the front of “S” and omitted the last vowel “I” which is the custom
of Hieroglyphic text writing. During time of Akhenaten (Moses), the Great Pyramid was known as Sina
whilst during Horemhobo’s (Aaron) time, it was known as Horeb. The process of initiation into the
mysteries is carried out under the Great Pyramid and the Sphinx. In other words, magic mount Seir,
Sina (later Sinai) and Horeb are nothing but the Great Pyramid. But you may ask, If things such as
kingship is addressed with kinship in ancient times, is it not correct to say that Mena must be the Son of
Esiri (Esau) who also married Adah? And is it not possible that Adah is of Ibo origin. Adah is the
daughter of Elon (Elonu ?, Genesis 36:2). Furthermore, Ekete (Akhete) is the high horizon for the stars
which means “place” in Okpe. But in Genesis 36:27, Akan ethnic group of Ghana have the same
culture with the Ibo people of weaving the same colourful Kente and Akwete clothe respectively. The
colours are of the rainbow/stars in the high horizon. Surprisingly, the first slave castle in Ghana was
named Osu castle. The Akan name may have origin in Aka because a person from Nigeria is known as
Nigerian. The man who chaired the commission to edit the Bible was Ezra in 400 BC; Ezra is an
abbreviated name for EzeOra. And Akan was one of the children of Ezra (Genesis 36:27) who has the
root of Esiri (Esau). The Ghanian Akan tongue is similar to Okpe, Uvwie and Ibo because I can pick
some words from their speaking of it. Furthermore and to buttress my point that Aka represents Esau
and the latter is also Esiri (Osiris), the Gnostic Nag Hammadi Library collection of Religious text
comes to mind. When decoded, the name Nag Hammadi becomes Anagho Ammadi. This in Ibo has to
do with the “God of Ammadi is going, gone or where is it going”. On the other hand, the Ghanian
knows some Nigerians as Anagho people. But decode “Anagho” and the result becomes “Ghana”.
These are the people who share the same language variables with Ibo people. Definitely these can’t be

Yet another link to Aka by Ghana is from the name of a tribe known as Asanti. Asanti or Asante are the
same. Asa as we can see is the root. The other syllable “Nti” means man. Therefore; Asanti means Asa
man. Asa as we know already is the trinity of Esiri, Isi and Uroh. The Asanti tribe is an umbrella for
other ethnic groups which come together at some time in history but the suppression law of the
Ghanian Chietaincy rule known as
“Obi nkyere obi ase” which is one of the pillars on which Asanti was built made it as a law restricting
any individual from revealing the identities of the congeries of ethnic groups that came to form Asanti
federation” (The life and Work of Nkrumah, Edited by Kwame Arhin, page 14).

Because of this law, we have difficulty in ascertaining who these ethnic groups are but suffice here that
with Asa and Nti, we can deduce that they may be one of us the Esiri children while Nti group might
come from East Africa representing the Bantu. For Nti stands for man and Ntu stands for men

The code for Aka is 63336 (mystery code number for Asa, Esiri). While the prison code for Nelson
Mandela was 64446 (Xhosa ethnic group of South Africa believe they are descendants of Amonhotope,
Solomon). The number 6 is Era. 3 is Esa (Asa) in Uvwie. Whilst 4 is Ene as I have explained before.
So, this indicates that Mandela is from the root of Solomon, David and subsequently Jesus, because the
number 4 is attributed to Jesus thereby representing his two parents and twin brother Omatie. These can
be verified in the Zodiac. This zodiac (Izodiaca), Just like Izoduwa, is the Ogisoic name for Asadiaca.
Zodiac mean, the sun (represented by Esiri) lives in or has reached Aka. Each house of Izodiaca is an
Age or era of 2661years or near this figure. But on the scale of twelve months, each age is one month.


Read from the house of Ram backwards, Ram for Ramese (that is, call him Ra)[Aries], followed by
Bull (Bull stand for Baal [Baale, Freemasonry; by Jack. M. Driver, page 141][Taurus]) and Twins
[twins stands for Iyesuwa and Omatie, Jesus and Chrestus][Gemini], these are numbered 1, 2 and 3
anti-clockwise out of the twelve houses which also stand for twelve months in a year. But before Ram
(ese), there is Pisces which is two fishes and the next third house in front is the Archer (Sagittarius)
man who is holding Bow and Arrow signifying a Soldier. One thing of note is that, Ramese was also
known as Pa Ramese, a corruption of Opo/Opa Ramese (stick, Opa in Yoruba, Okpo in Urhobo).
Ramese was the king who struggled with Akhenaten for the right to the thrown. He produced his
Opo/Okpo after Akhenaten/Moses did in order to tell the king makers that he has the right to the throne.
This is echoed in the Bible when Moses produces a staff of Office, errorneously said to be the magic
stick which produces a snake. Big lie, the stick with a bronze snake-head is indicative of Ra God and
right to the kingship of Egypt.

In any case, counting anti-clockwise gives a clear symbolic history of Urhobo the Egyptians handing
over the era to Yoruba starting from Ramese, to the Baale and finally to the age of the twins of Iyesuwa
and Omatie who started their ministries in the age of the Pisces. Remember, Jesus fed the multitude
with two fishes. The two fishes (indicative of twin birth) is represented with the fish hat of the Pope in
Rome who in-turn represents the twins father Tiberius who was Roman. Tiberius was a Roman
General in the Holy land and Syria.

Also note that the three world mythical creation stories of Egypt (Urhobo), Yoruba and Benin clearly
mirrors the Zodiac three ages of Ram, Bull and Twins, i.e. Ram for Ramese which is Urhobo, Bull for
Baale which is Yoruba and Twins for Iyesuwa and Omatie which are Uzebu or Ijebu (Benin) origin.

Indeed, the bible is full of our history. This is why I am calling for a new historiography for the
Urhobos, Itsekiris and Yorubas to unravel the grand theft of our history instead of separating ourselves
from each other because of small economic capital. I believe that the war against marginalization is not
to be fought within Urhobo but in the bigger world of Nigeria and the entirety of the planet earth.
Modern democracy is about inclusion not seclusion whereby the number in our population is reduced
because of some short sighted individuals that are aggrieved of one offence or the other. The genuine
religious people and Patriots like us do not fight for individual wealth of money but for the pride and
dignity for our father and mother land.

Dr. Osume’s skewed analysis of proving his own version of Okpe group’s difference by employing one
third land mass geography and comparative study of lexico-statistical percentages of one compared to
those of another related language is a beggers belief. It reminds me of the Jehovah’s witness hoax of
144000 people to inherit the earth. The problem of our people is probably identifying with the name
Urhobo; who he was and what is the origin of this precious name. This is why, it is important to devise
ways to educate Urhobo people of our history taken from the Bible and ancient Egyptian history. In this
hidden resource, the truth and facts are hidden; we should come together as a matter of urgency to
unveil the secrets so that we can remove ourselves from this damaging self destruct. For lack of this
knowledge, other kingdoms in Nigeria have hoodwinked us to believe that we are their offsprings. We
cannot continue to be spring chickens while the world is usurping our history to their advantage and
our disadvantage. Mr. S. Obruche, the UK Chair of Urhobo Historical Society at one time gave an
account of how some Benin history enthusiasts spoke to him in innuendoes of Urhobo people’s lack of
knowledge of their own rich and authentic history in the wake of Itsekiri people’s belligerence in the
former Mid West State against the Urhobo. The failure they recognized and held-on to it in their claim
that we were children of Benin. A fraud which I once believed but not now. Annexing Urhobo to Benin
is a wrong history the Okpe Scholars has clothed themselves in. It feels comfortable to be clothed in
another man’s cloths when you think that you cannot have one. I will re-iterate that, how can you cloth
your self with the cloths of the great (Uku) world that drove other worlds including you away? (Uku
Akpolokpolo), and your name representing the driven one (Orodje, Igboze). Orodje means a person who
runs away and Igboze means Igbo runs away too. The etymology of our names and words, best explain
our relationship with other ethnic groups and among ourselves.

The similarities in our names i.e. Esiri, Asa, Asaduwa, Izoduwa etc. came about because we are of one
origin Abram; a fact Dr. Osume is not allowing me to say. But I will nevertheless explain one point
here, the similarity in the name of Asa, Asaduwa, Izoduwa is significant. People say Asaduwa
(Izoduwa) married an Urhobo woman just as Abram married an Ancient Egyptian woman Hagar. Are
these Patriarchs not the same person? (Genesis 16:1-3, Genesis 21:1-12, Genesis 22:1-14). The story
goes that when Sarah finally had a son Isaac, Sarah admonished Abram not to allow this bond child
(Ismael who mocks) inherit his estate and Abram promptly sent Hagar away.

From Urhobo point of view; when you marry your relative by mistake, you will have to perform rituals
to appease the gods and Irinvwin (The Dead) because it is forbidden (Aghar, Hagar). The couple’s
hands are tied, flogged symbolically and both runs away while a goat is slaughtered. In Yoruba this
tradition is called Sarah. Is it not sensible to say that Abram killed a goat as Sarah-appeasement instead
of Isaac? The Mount Moriah in this story means I have found a wife in Yoruba language. Futhermore,
Ismael the son of Aghar was made up of three syllable name of gods of Egypt (Asa, means three in
Uvwie), Isi, Maat and Eloho, [Is from Isi, Ma from maat, El from Eloho]). We know who Isi and Eloho
are. Maat means the god of truth and Judgment. So therefore, could our Asaduwa be the biblical Abram
also known as Aramfe in Yoruba? In Genesis 22 verse 14, Abram re-named the land where he was to
sacrifice Isaac as Jehovah-“jireh”. The word Jireh is an expression for praise in Urhobo and Hagar
when decoded becomes Aghar thereby denoting the forbidden marriage between Sarah and Abram.
But, was there any Sarah? Because Sarah is also known as appeasing the gods, it is this ritual of
appeasing the gods that must be done to remove the curse of the gods. Please someone should awaken
Jerome (UyaRome, Yarome, suffer of Rome) from the dead to explain to us how he redactioned the
Bible for the Romans.

The users of Esau, Esiri, Essa, Ausar history did not stop at usurping the name. Esiris’ spiritual
concepts, prayers and rules were also taken on-board for other purposes. For instance the meticulous
work of an Australian author (Tony Bushby) exposes the grand theft of our heritage. Chief
Omokomoko, the singer sang the lords’ prayer in some times past; by the time of rhythmic
composition, chief Omokomoko probably thought that the prayer belongs to Oyinbo as all of us
thought. To the contrary; it is of Esiri origin.

In-fact, the Lord’s prayer, the book of revelation and the ten commandments were originated by Esiri
(Asar, Essa, Osiris, Oziri etc.) and his wife Isi [The crucifixion of Truth, Tony Bushby, page 279-280,
also; Moses and Akhenaten, Osman Ahmed, page 172, also Moses Mysteries, Gary Greenberg, page
153 and Secret in the Bible, Tony Bushby, pages 298-299].

This will be expanded on below.

Tony Bushby categorically states in his titled page of:

“the forerunner writing to the Book of revelation (C. 500 BC)” that the document known as the
apocalyptic writing of the Sibyl of Tarquin was originally called “Mysteries of Osiris and Isis (Esiri
and Isi, my emphasis). That; it was the true origin of the book of Revelation and the probable source of
the concept of the essenes’ two precious prayers to the heavenly father and earthly mother” (The
crucifixion of truth, Tony Bushby, page179)

i.e. Oseravware r’bojuvwu, our father….etc. In other words, the lords prayer is for Esiri, i.e. Assa,
Aesa, Osonobrughwe, Osanobua, (Osiris) who is in heaven.

Not to be left behind, the author Ahmed Osman further exposes the fraud in the bible when he states in
his book of Moses and Akhenaten that the

“Ten Commandments given by the Lord God of Moses to the Israelites in Sinai are clearly an Egyptian
tradition and would seem to have common roots with the Egyptian Book of the Dead” (Moses and
Akhenaten, Ahmed Osman, page 172). The negative confessions of the Ancient Egyptians which are
part of a funerary ritual for the deceased, judged by Esiri (Osiris) and his forty two (42) assessor Judges
and forty two Principles clearly illuminate our minds that the Ten commandments was lifted from the
Osirian culture (The Moses Mysteries, Gary Greenberg, page 153, some are my emphasis).


Looking from the perspective of Reverend Dr. C. Osume, one will not blame him for obvious mistakes.
He had been brain-washed by the mighty Church that has designed programmes to perpetually
hypnotize adherents for them to remain where they are. As I have referred him before, the book of
revelation which was interfered with, probably by the redaction Roman or English re-writers have it in
REVELATION 2 verse 9 that those who call themselves Jews are not Jews. They are not Jews. [We
should note here that these re-writers actually added verses 1-7 in Chapter 1 into the book of
revelations as explained by the author of the Secret in the Bible, Tony Bushby] Yet my brother still held
on the view that the Jews are the chosen people of which he cited some cranky authors.

Those who claim to be Israelites today were the same people who stole our history “as a result of the
bitter divorce (18th dynasty upheaval, my emphasis), ancient Egypt became permanent casualty of the
chosen people, the Jewish scribes reflected the political and religious disputes of those ancient times by
mixing history and fiction in their re-editing of the Bible. They changed names and chronology of
events to complete their cover-up scheme” (Tutankhamun, Moustafa Gadalla, page 30)

In my write-up published in, under the title “A brief and authentic history
of Abram (Aramfe), Isaac (Ooni), Esau (Esiri), Jacob (Uyakoba) etc. I made it clear by citing some
Jewish writers and scholars that the Jews of today are not the Israelites that Dr. C. osume is looking up
to. To be serious, from all my indications of research, the Israelites referred to in the Bible are the
Yorubas who came to Egypt to mix with the Urhobos. It is them who joined the Urhobos in
worshipping Isi, Ra, and Eloho i.e. ISRAEL. From these three gods we have Israel (Is’is’, ‘Ra’,
‘El’oho). What other literal meaning can Osume religiously get. Isi is our mother, Ra is the sun god,
because the Urhobo language knows the sun to come in the morning and go in the evening and we say
Yan Ra, or Sha Ra. Walk to me. And El from Eloho is the god of vegetation. i.e. Okpa god. Or, is it
possible that Eloho is Okpe god? Hence we should hazard a guess that Okpe name was taken from
Okpa god which is Eloho?

One more important point was made by no other more relevant personality than our Own Urhobo role
model. He said that:

“Urhobos are among the twelve tribes of Israel and Hebrew. And Ibo (Igbo) people are the prominent
ethnic group of Hebrew in Nigeria” (The origin of Urhobo nation of the Federal Republic of Nigeria,
by Major General David Akpode Ejoor, page 1).

I agree by half. What the author did not say is that, by mixed marriages some Urhobos became
Hebrews during the periods of Yoruba entering into Egypt; for example, the people of Orogun whom he
said were Ibos are also mixed with Itsekiris. This is why they are a mix of Yoruba (Itsekiri), Ibo and
Urhobo. Furthermore, the Hebrew language is a combination of African, Greek and Palestinian
languages and this includes Urhobo. But where-as the name ISRAEL is authentic to Urhobo because Isi
(Izu) was our mother, Ra and Eloho were our Sun and Vegetation gods respectively.

Therefore, where lies the evidence of the Biblical Jews that they are the chosen people. Indeed, Gary
Greenberg also asked the same question thus:

How do we know; independent of the Bible, that Israel ’s presence in Egypt was preceded by an earlier
presence in Palestine ? [ as those who assume the name are claiming to be the real Israelites, my
emphasis]. Why is there no archaeological record of Israel or Hebrew people prior to the thirteen (13th)
Century BC. Why is there no extra biblical evidence linking any Semitic tribes to the Hebrew people?
And why did the so-called ten lost tribes of Israel disappear from history without any archaeological
trace of their existence? (The Moses Mysteries: The African Origins of the Jewish people, Gary
Greenberg, page 2).

For Reverend Osume’s information; there are no lost tribes of Israel . If he reads his Bible carefully
without holding to the tally of indoctrination, he will see that the Biblical children of Israel are
everywhere in the world with Nigeria their base. These are the Oduduwa children in the Bible book of,
Genesis 25:8-10, Genesis 29:30-35 and Genesis 30:1-24. It is no co-incidence that Oduduwa had 13
children just as Jacob did. Re-Uben was the first child of Jacob and so was Benin for Oduduwa. Juya
was the Eight child of Oduduwa, so was Joseph to Jacob, Benjamin was close to Joseph and so the
Itsekiri language is close to Benue language. Dinah, a woman is the last daughter of Jacob and so was
Telu, the Oluwo of Iwo to Oduduwa. These two women were the only daughters of their heroic fathers.
Are these co-incidence? No! Please think deep.

But people say that Oduduwa had up to fifteen children but none had been able to say exactly who the
two lineages which when added to the thirteen we know of makes it fifteen. One certain place I have
researched is Gary Greenberg’s book where my mind was illuminated that:

“the Calebites and the Kenites are two children which made Jacobs children 15 in number and they
were from the root of Moses co-opted into his (jacob’s) children (The Moses mysteries: The African
Origins of the Jewish people, Gary Greenberg, page 256).

So, are these Calebites and Kenites the same people as Ikale and Okenne/Ikenne who increased the
number of Oduduwa children to fifteen? Gary Greenberg also wrote that the Calebites have links with
Hebrew. It is exactly the same with the Ikale ethnic group who have links with Ibo.


It is obvious in Reverend Dr. Osume’s write-up that he does not know the meaning of Urhobo. I will
help him. The Colonialists know who the real Ancient Egyptians were in Africa. They also know their
neighbours. They had withheld this information from us because of the economic capital involved.
Those who are in the know among we Africans, are related to the Colonialists by intermarriage and
close-quarters intelligence Officers. Others are deep researchers with third eye. One such person was:

“Yamu Numa (1950) who said the Urhobo probably came ultimately from Egypt, and they are
descendants of Prince Urhiabo and the ancient ruling caste of Egypt who left Egypt in 812 BC for Ile
Ife” (The Urhobo People, page 23).

The editors of “the Urhobo People” book did not take him seriously because the virus of empirical data
rules. Of course Yamu Numa got it spot on though I am not sure of the date. Horemhobo of the 18th
Dynasty Egypt assumed the name of Horus (Uroh, Urho, Urhoh). Other Kings before him too also
assumed the name on coming to the throne.

It is even said that Jesus has Uroh name. The book “Tut-Ankh-Amen by Gadalla gives blow by blow
account of how the history of the Boy King Tutankhamen resemble’s the history of Jesus.
Tutankhamen’s Horus name is “Nefer-Hebo Gere-Tawi (Nebti)” (The Hebrew Pharaohs of Egypt;
Ahmed Osman, page 117). The “Nefer-Hebo” is clearly an Urhobo name badly spelt. It is actually
“Nefer’Urhobo” meaning look at the wealth of Urhobo. The boy’s various names and those of his
parents clearly shows that he is Itsekiri of Yoruba tribe whose great grand mother is Urhobo known as
Tiye the Egyptian.

For the self all knowing group of a section of Okpe Scholars headed by sentimental Reverend Dr.
Charles Osume to hazard a guess that Okpe people are not Urhobo beat my imagination to say the least.
First their narratives is woven round their allegation that Igboze is the progenitor of Okpe and hailed
from Bini between 1550 and 1650.

Perhaps if we are to disbelieve the four traditions of origin of the Urhobo people as properly
researched and enunciated by Onigu Otite et al, which are:- Emigration from original Edo
territory, traditions of origin from Ife, Autochthony and traditions of origin from the Sudan and
Egypt. Then Dr. Osume and his co-travellers should be aware of what Egharevwa meant below:

“by the 14th century when some of the emigrants left Benin (sic), they found in their destinations
in Urhobo territory some Edo speaking settlers”(The Urhobo People; Onigu Otite in citing
Egharevwa, page 10).

Is it not obvious that if Igboze left Benin in the 16th or 17th century, then this alleged progenitor
cannot father the Okpe people because other Okpe people had already established themselves in
Urhobo Land?

Secondly, they alleged that Prince Igboze founded Olomu. Thirdly, the senior son of Okpe left Olomu
settlement for his nephew also known as Olomu in order to avoid conflict. Olomu was the son of
Okpe’s sister. Okpe and his relatives then founded Okpe-Isoko also known as Okpe r’ikpere. And much
later, Okpe’s three children founded Orerokpe Whilst Orhoro the 2nd son founded Ozoro.

It is impossible for Okpe people’s lineage to begin in 1550 or 1650. Dr. Osume’s article written to
diminish my point on this matter also tried to diminish the research work of Onigu Otite et al’s
multi-disciplinary approach of their book “The Urhobo People”, a huge field work originating
from Urhobo Kings, Chiefs, Elders, Opinion leaders, Scholars, Historians etc. All what Urhobo
Patriots concluded included the point that, Okpe people are Urhobos. For the self appointed
scholars of some section to avaricely say Okpe belong to some mundane history is grossly
insulting. Such history belongs to the cabinet of instrumental history where classes of people
struggles for positions and self aggrandizements.

I cannot understand Osume and his supporters when they hypothesize that Igboze founded Olomu; yet
his child Okpe left the settlement of Olomu to the nephew begotten by Okpe’s sister. At least, we know
that Okpe did not sleep with his sister. Olomu therefore was founded by the man whom the sister
married. Simple logic. it does not make sense for Igboze to found a settlement and let his brother in-law
name it after himself thereby disenfranchising himself and his family. Gleaning the narratives here and
there, one could conclude that Olomu has elements of Ibo origin but the history of Olomu from another
perspective says more to this. Below is one perception.

Going by our history of Urhobo; the man Igboze had no child. But Mr. Alaka who eloped with Igboze’s
mother to Olomu fathered three children, these were, Uhurie, Eyanvwen and a daughter who
married Oghoro an Izon Prince from Ekiagbodo. And through these three lineages, the royal house
of Olomu revolves till today.

The following are the royal families in Olomu and from here many migrated to other areas of Urhobo
as Okpe people. (The origin of Urhobo nation…., Major General David Ejoor, page 24)


Okpavuerhe Okpara

Okpe Ophori Ovwor

Agbon Oviri Ovwodokpokpor

Oguname Akpere Aloba




These are the kindred which makes part of Urhobo Nation of today & Okpe
is one of them

Though Igboze was a Prince of Benin, he was short-changed for Obaship. His mother left Benin in
annoyance with another man (Alaka) to Olomu. Igboze later followed with three Ogiso Ovwor (Staff of
Office) to Olomu where his mum is in hiding. He married an Izon woman whom he killed for ritual to
obtain spiritual power in order to be Oba of Benin. The gamble failed. He fathered no children.
Nonetheless, the Olomu People used Igboze’s name as an advantage to buy Ovieship from Benin (Ibid
page 26).

In another viewpoint; Okpe is said to be related to Uvwie. In Evwrun (Effurun), we have three ruling
quarters, these are, Erovie, Alaka and Ogbe quarters. The past King Eruohwo the 2nd was from
Edjekohwo family. In Ekpan, we have two main ruling quarters; Edjekuvwie and Eyaye with one late
arrival known as Izegbo whom was said to have run away from Benin. In Djedo, we have Esezi ruling
quarter. Geographically these ruling quarters when lined up in a graph, they give a picture of a beeline
graph in a map. My question is; is this not the same Alaka that eloped with Igboze’s mother to Olomu
who is now domiciled in Effurun? And is this not the same Igboze that changed his name to Izegbo in
Ekpan? I leave that to conjecture.

And in the final analysis of the quarters; these names also strike a chord, they are: Edjekohwo,
Edjekuvwie, Igboze, Izegbo, Djedo. These names have one thing in common, RUN. They all have to
do with run. But running away from what in Aka or Benin. If they are so related, why should they run
away? I posit that they are all running away from invaders who some may be related. This is why the
suggestion that:

“what may be called the autochthons were so strongly organized and established that other immigrating
Urhobo fitted in easily while Bini Warrior/rulers-settlers were absorbed into the local culture”(The
Urhobo People; Onigu Otite et al, page 24).

becomes Very Relevant.


For once, the racism in Reverend Dr. C. Osume mind did not allow him to reason that the Name Izu
could have root and origin as he well know that African names are important with their symbolism. Just
like Asaduwa and Izoduwa have origin in their root of Assa, asa, Ausa, Esiri, and Osiris, Izu too could
have taken its root from Isi. For example, from Isi we have Genesis (gene of Isi). This Ancestral mother
was worshipped for many years and in different evolutionary names e.g. Madonna, Maria-Amune
(daughter of herod, Doreh?), Mary Magdalene and Sybil [Sybil, could be a corruption of Isi Obiren or
Obirin, i.e. Isi is a woman] [Isi waador, Igbe waador] all took her characteristics before Constantine
and his supporters suppressed her worship. We still have her heritage in Churches today and whilst in
France , Paris was dedicated or named after her Temple i.e. Paris . This means in Urhobo, Opo of Isi, in
Yoruba, Opar of Isi, equals to Par isi and later Temples was built for her in many places in Europe and
the Mediterranean which also transformed into Churches today. Remember that most of the Urhobo
names where changed to Yoruba in ancient Egypt when the dynasty changed hands during the inception
of the 18th dynasty or earlier. In other words, Izu or Isi might be the same Great Mother that Dr. Osume
is referring to.

Furthermore, intermarriages could cause the change of Isi to Izu. The Levites who lived alongside the
Nile and opposite side of Amon could be a source of cultural mix among Urhobo, Izon, Itsekiri and
others who co-inhabited Ancient Egypt. We have names like Butulezi, Tutu , Zimbabwe , Zambia , and
Zambezi . But coming down to earth in Nigeria , the Izu could well identify with Ibo who share the
same cultural costume of Red Hat and garments with Okpe. There are names like Ozuzu in Igbo
language. But the name Igboze strikes a chord in my mind that there are situations whereby people
have to run and this involves the Igbos and Urhobos which is why we have Onodje and Orodje. Being
that as it may, the Benin Royalty is having Uku Akpolokpolo meaning (in Yoruba and Urhobo) the
great world has driven another world away. This becomes poignant when we remember that the Oba of
Benin in his thank you tour after Corronation, went to the length of Nigeria but never reached Urhobo
Land . So, how can people be related yet lives so widely apart.

But in reality, the Okpe language stands out and away from the Benin which is mixed with Yoruba.
People are always in resonance and harmony with what they wear in relation to the ancestral culture.
Okpe Chieftaincy attire is bright red and Uvwie is white. These are representative in Ancient Egypt as
Upper Egypt and Lower Egypt respectively. The Benin Royalty is attired in both Red and White
thereby denoting unification of Upper and Lower Egypt in the past. But did Benin Royalty unify us in
the past? That is subject to more investigation.


The Lions Dr. Osume is proud of but ignorantly claiming to be of Benin , is actually of Urhobo origin.
The Sphinx is the main Aka with other smaller ones adorning the Temples and Pyramids of Egypt.
Under the Pyramids and the Sphinx is where our ancestors learn the mysteries and perform rituals to
God almighty. The culture was stolen by the freemasons and they claim that an Ancient Egyptian Sage
known as Orme bequeath it on them. Orme is an Urhobo name for mine and that is exactly what
Michael Baigent et al said is the meaning of Orme in their book. The Egyptians in this mystery school
of Esiri performs rituals under the Lion (Sphinx, Aka) and this the Freemasons symbolically perform as
gripping the lion’s arm. Orme and later Ormius which means OURS was clearly explained in Holy
Blood, and Holy Grail page 123, by Michael Baigent et al that, it is of Ancient Egypt. The Benin only
lived in Avaris for a certain time after invading Ancient Egypt but were driven out by King Ahmose
(Urhobo name for “children of one father”). This is where they embraced the name Aka for the first
time because Avaris was originally Zevbaka and this name much sound like Okpe which means “Run
to the safety of Aka the Lion”.
So, the Aka which is lion is not originally Benins ’ but of Urhobo’.

Painfully, the smarting of Dr. Osume could not give us the “identifiable history of Okpe which he
traced to Benin whilst in his boasting that he can reasonably trace our genealogical line from a common
parentage, i.e. from Igboze to Okpe and to the four quarters, i.e. Adene Okpe.


As I have said in the past; the Ogisos are the Hyksos. The Ogisos and later Benins came from the root
of Jacob (Uyakoba, Yakoob, Yakub aal). It is likely that their entry or invasion into Egypt and joining
the children of Esau (Esiri) may coincide with the eruption of the Thera Volcano- (But could this also
coincide with the anachronistic naming of Abram’s father as Tera?). This becomes obvious in their
mythical world creation story that sounded almost the same as that of the Yoruba. (See both Yoruba and
Benin stories above).

Indeed, “the Hyksos was roughly contemporaneous with a period of global cooling, which may have
been caused by a massive volcanic explosion spewing large amounts of dust into upper atmosphere.
The massive eruption of Thera has been dated to 1628 BCE using tree-ring records, although historians
prefer to date the eruption to circa 1500BCE. David Rohl dates the beginning of early Hyksos period to
circa 1450 BCE Following the exodus of the Israelites”
(http://www.mystae/restricted/streams/thera/exodus.htm/#1kings). The receding water of the volcanic
wave will definitely leave Sea shells, fishes and other marine life for birds to pick and this might have
been used to transform in symbolic form the story heralding a new life in a new environment after a

It was Josehpus Flavius who stated that the whole nation styled themselves Hyksos using sacred dialect
with the aspiration of Egyptian tongue which means Shepherd Kings. That, the first syllable “Hyk”
means King whilst “Sos” means Shepherd. (Against Apion, Josephus Flavius, page 1:14). Is this not
same as Kings of the Sky which the Benins call Ogie-So? Josephus further re-iterate that, Hyksos is
derived from Egyptian words Hekau-rulers and Khaswet-foreign hill neighborhood and that, the
Egyptians had used this term since the middle kingdom to describe normadic Chieftains on the North
eastern border (Ibid, with my emphasis).

If the Egyptians (Urhobos) had used Hekau-rulers [eka people](King Shepherds) and Khaswet-foreign
hill dwellers to describe this people then they are the Uzebu of Benin. For, the Uzebus are known as
Cattle Rearers in Benin history. The Urhobo on the other hand know them as Idjebu people while in
Yoruba language, they are known as Ijebu. That brings the question, could this be the original
occupation of the Benins in time past but with time they relinquish it when they saw greener pastures?

In other to get to the root of this, I have used the sacred Egyptian text of language to decipher Hyksos
and this is the result below.

The sacred language is actually Evba (Evwa, Ifa). And Hekau is a text and name from Evba but both
Evba text and name were taken over by the formation of Hebrew language which comprises African,
Palestinian and Greek Languages. Eka the Evba Egyptian word becomes Ogisoic word of Hekau when
it was transformed into Yoruba and Urhobo-mixed word. This Ogisoic word of Hekau later was
transformed to Hykso the Hebrew and the sacred evba became known also later as Zohar, Torah and
Tarot. It is during this transformation of words that Evwurun (Ephron, Ephrun) was said to be the Son
of Zohar, who is the Hitite that is in the front of Mamre (Ekpan)[Genesis 25:9] Zoh means come in
Hausa, Ra means come in Uvwie. Pronounce “Ar” which is in front of Zohar backward and you will
get come come. Indeed, the Uvwie people call the Moon “Amon” from Omeramon. Amon means it is
coming. The Zoh hereby indicate our journey from Egypt through Hausa land. i.e. our coming from

Using Evba or Equidistant letter sequencing; the alphabets below are changed or swapped with
interchangeable Greek and African alphabets.


African O African G African I African S African O

remain O becomes becomes remain S becomes
Greek K Greek y Greek H


When decoded in a mirror image, it will read HSYKO. Using ELS sequencing of IHVH (Code of God,
and Iyevwe, Iyehowa and Jehovah); i.e. “I” stand for Father, “H” stands for Mother and “V” stands for
Child, “the “Y” in HSYKO which is also “I” is brought back besides “H”, and “S” is put in front of
“K” to read HYKSO, for, these alphabets have numerical associations and works in harmony of
seniority. This is exactly how Evba or Ifa and Zohar (Oracle) works. Evba (Ifa, Voodoo) works in
Binary numbers.

The long and short of this analysis is that; either the Benins are part of Idjebu ethnic group of Yoruba or
they assimilated the Idjebus or were intermarried.


I don’t know If Reverend Osume was prevaricating or totally ignorant of the fact that if any scholar is
to be spurious; it is only in the invention of religion that such soubriquets can be found especially in the
Roman Church. Mixing Political struggle with religious oppression is not alien to the church.
Constantine in 325 AD onwards did steal our history, kill some of his family members and others to
actualize himself on the throne of Rome. In that struggle, his supporters and

“Biblical scribes wrote our history upside down as historical accounts of the Bible but there is no
historical evidence of these beneficiaries in history to support the manipulated accounts” (Tutu-ankh-
amon; Moustafa Gadalla, page 104, some are my emphasis).

Dr. Osume questioned the time-line of Moses and Akhenaten, Horemhobo, Aaron and their
historiography that are separated with over a century apart. Be that as it may; how can the Reverend
explain the fact that “despite the hard work of Biblical Scholars; historians and archaeologists, no
single piece of evidence has been found to support the period of the supposed united monarchy of
David and Solomon. Scholars have been confused by the biblical chronology which presents David and
Solomon as having belonged to the period following both the exodus and the settlement in the promise
land” (Ibid, page 1).

The Reverend can probably explain this scenario of “no one knows the Tomb or grave of Moses; so
was the case of Akhenaten. (B) Moses life and religion match precisely with those of Akhenaten (1367-
1361 BC). (C) King David’s war accounts match precisely with those of King Tuthmosis the third
(1490-1436 BC), (D) King Solomon’s life and lack of wars match precisely with those of King
Amenhotep the third (1436-1413 BC)”(Ibid, page 84).

He also argued that Moses and Aaron departed the scene long before Akhenaten and Horemhobo
appeared on the scene. Since the plagiarizers anachronistically used the history of Tuthmosis and
Amenhotep for David and Solomon respectively, is it not also convenient for them to use the history of
Akhenaten and Horemhobo for Moses and Aaron anachronistically? After-all, knowledgeable
Egyptians have been massacred and others driven away from Egypt and their Libraries destroyed. Lets
have a look on the table below to see how many years separates Akhenaten (Moses) and Aaron


Tuthmosis (David) 54 1490-1436 BC

Amenhotep 2nd 23 1436-1413 BC

Tuthmosis 1V 8 1413-1405 BC

Amenhotep 3rd 38 1405-1367 BC


Akhenaten (Moses) 6 1367-1361 BC

Semenkhare - 1361-1361 BC

Tutankhamun 9 1361-1352 BC

Aye (Ephraim) 4 1352-1348 BC

Horemhobo (Aaron) 13 1348-1335 BC

The 18th Dynasty of the Kings of Egypt (Historical Deception, by Moustapha Gadalla).

From the above table, it is clear that the difference between Akhenaten (Moses) and Horemhobo
(Aaron) is only thirteen years.
Historians, archaeologists and Egyptologists has agreed with my position that Aaron is the same person
as Horemhobo as seen below:

“three names that was inscribed in the cartouche of Horemhobo reveals the three characters of Aaron,
Miriam his sister and Miriam’s son Horus and this confirms that Aaron is indeed Pharaoh Horemhobo”
(Secrets of the Exodus; Messod and Roger Sabbah, page 127)

These two authors also cited Claude Vandersleyen that Hor (Hor, is therefore Uroh, because the
Ancient Egyptians writes from right to left and the first or last vowels are removed) was Horemhobo’s
proper name until the Greeks messed it up by adding “S” to become Horus. (Ibid)


Finally, It is important to address the language Reverend Dr. Charles Osume used to categorize my
work. I refute the appellation he gave me especially when it comes to serious issues as ethnicity and
ancestral origins. If anybody or groups are to be spurious in their works, the Church is legendary. And
here I will prove it by citing a little of the many lies the Church has invented.

“Shortly after the closing of the Council of Nicaea in 325 AD, a forged reference to Jesus Christ
appeared in Josephus records and it is today called the testimony of Flavius” (Antiquities, xv111, ch. 3,
Testimonium Flavianum). Theologians later discovered that it was Bishop Eusebius who forged the
passages after the latter owned up to re-writing a copy of Josephus works in 329 AD. Eusebius
admitted by saying this words “It is an act of Virtue to deceive and lie, when by such means the
interests of the church might be promoted” (Ecclesiastical History, Eusebius, Vol. 1, pages 381-382),
also in (The Twin Deception; Tony Bushby, page 82).

Not too long after Emperor (Emperor for Empirical data), Constantine had invented Christianity from
his lineage by democratically electing to use Jesus and Chrestus to be the Roman God, Pope Damasus
offered Jerome a contract to restructure the Bible which became the Vulgate. In a letter to Pope
Damasus, Jerome wrote “It was useless to correct the New Testament, for versions of scripture which
already exist in the language of others show that their additions are false”. In other words, Pope
Damasus had asked Jerome to corrupt the Bible and this was confirmed by the Catholic Encyclopedia
of its refutal of the virgin birth as events not based on fact thus:

“There seems to be no doubt that the infancy narratives of Matthew and Luke were later additions to
the original body of apostolic Catechesis” (New Catholic Encyclopedia, 1967 Ed. Vol. x1v, page 693),
also in (The Twin Deception, Tony Bushby, page 201)

The comment of Pope Leo X really sum it up during an Easter Friday banquet. Holding a chalice of
wine in the air, he toasted by saying:

How well we know what a profitable superstition this fable of Christ has been for us and our
predecessors (Ibid, page 239).
From this journey so far, I believe one hundred percent that I have proved beyond reasonable doubt that
the Okpe people are Urhobo but not Benin. That Urhobo people once owned Aka which is known today
as Benin. The Benins on the other hand are children of Oduduwa also known as Izoduwa which may be
the same person as Asaduwa who married an Urhobo Woman. The Okpe people cannot be children of
Benin who are their cousins. That the history of Okpe predates Benin in the dynasty of Mena the
second King of Egypt. In Uvwie we say Mi rireni, and in Urhobo of Agbaroh dialect I say Mi
yenrovwan which means I greet you all.


1.; Wilson Ometan, 2004

2. Secrets of the Exodus; Did the Pharaohs write the Bible?, Messod and Roger Sabbah, 2000
3. Tutu-ankh-amen; Moustafa Gadalla, 1999
4. http://www.mystae/restricted/streams/thera/exodus.htm/#1kings
5. The Moses Mysteries: The African Origins of the Jewish people, Gary Greenberg, 1996
6. The crucifixion of Truth; Tony Bushby, 2004
7. Moses and Akhenaten; Osman Ahmed, 2002
8. The origin of Urhobo nation…; Major General David Ejoor, 2004
9. The Secret in the Bible; Tony Bushby, 2003
10.Traditional Religion and Christianity on Nigeria: The Urhobo people; Very Reverend, Professor
S.U. Erivwo, 2003
11.Historical deception: the untold story of Ancient Egypt; Moustafa Gadalla, 1999
12.The Holy Bible; Trinitarian Bible Society, 1989
13.The Hebrew Pharaohs of Egypt; Ahmed Osman, 2003
14.The Gods of the Egyptians; E.A. Wallis Bulge, 1969
15.Freemasonry; by Jack. M. Driver, 2006
16.Holly Blood and Holly Grail; Michael Baigent et al, 1996
17.The Twin Deception; Tony Bushby, 2005
18.Antiquities; X111V, ch.3, Testimonium Flavianum
19.Eccliasiastical History; Bishop Eusebius, Vol.1, pages 381-382
20.The Nag Hammadi Library; James M. Robinson, 1990
21.New Catholic Encyclopedia; 1967 Ed. Vol. x1v, page 693
22.The life and Work of Nkrumah; Edited by Kwame Arhin, 1993
23.The Okpe People: Notes for research; Professor Sam Oyovbaire
24.The Urhobo People; Onigu Otite, 1982