ChanRobles Virtual Law Library | chanrobles.

com

Like 0
Tweet Share Share
Search
Tweet

Philippine Supreme Court Jurisprudence > Year 2013 > July 2013 Decisions > G.R. No. 191566, July 17, 2013 -
PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES, Petitioner, v. EDGARDO V. ODTUHAN, Respondent.:

Custom Search Search

G.R. No. 191566, July 17, 2013 - PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES, Petitioner, v. EDGARDO V. ODTUHAN,
Respondent.

ChanRobles On-Line Bar Review

THIRD DIVISION

G.R. No. 191566, July 17, 2013

PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES, Petitioner, v. EDGARDO V. ODTUHAN, Respondent.

DECISION

PERALTA, J.:

This is a petition for review on certiorari under Rule 45 of the Rules of Court filed by petitioner People of
the Philippines, represented by the Office of the Solicitor General, against respondent Edgardo V.
Odtuhan assailing the Court of Appeals Decision1 dated December 17, 2009 and Resolution2 dated
March 4, 2010 in CA-G.R. SP No. 108616. The assailed decision granted the petition for certiorari filed
by respondent, and ordered the Regional Trial Court (RTC) of Manila, Branch 27, to give due course to
and receive evidence on respondents motion to quash and resolve the case with dispatch, while the
assailed resolution denied petitioners motion for reconsideration.

The facts of the case follow:cralavvonlinelawlibrary

DebtKollect Company, Inc.
On July 2, 1980, respondent married Jasmin Modina (Modina).3 On October 28, 1993, respondent
married Eleanor A. Alagon (Alagon).4 Sometime in August 1994, he filed a petition for annulment of his
marriage with Modina.5 On February 23, 1999, the RTC of Pasig City, Branch 70 granted respondents
petition and declared his marriage with Modina void ab initio for lack of a valid marriage license.6 On
November 10, 2003, Alagon died. In the meantime, in June 2003, private complainant Evelyn Abesamis
Alagon learned of respondents previous marriage with Modina.7 She thus filed a Complaint-Affidavit8
charging respondent with Bigamy.

On April 15, 2005, respondent was indicted in an Information9 for Bigamy committed as follows: cralavvonlinelawlibrary

That on or about October 28, 1993, in the City of Manila, Philippines, the said accused
being then legally married to JASMIN MODINA and without such marriage having been
legally dissolved, did then and there willfully, unlawfully and feloniously contract a second
or subsequent marriage with ELEANOR A. ALAGON, which second/subsequent marriage
has all the essential requisites for validity.

Contrary to law.10
ChanRobles Intellectual Property
Division
July-2013 Jurisprudence
G.R. No. 161921, July 17, 2013 - JOYCE V. ARDIENTE,
Petitioner, v. SPOUSES JAVIER AND MA. THERESA
PASTORFIDE, CAGAYAN DE ORO WATER DISTRICT AND
GASPAR GONZALEZ,* JR., Respondents.
G.R. No. 199114, July 16, 2013 - ROSALINDA
DIMAPILIS-BALDOZ, IN HER CAPACITY AS THEN
ADMINISTRATOR OF THE PHILIPPINE OVERSEAS
EMPLOYMENT ADMINISTRATION (POEA), Petitioner, v.
COMMISSION ON AUDIT, REPRESENTED BY CHAIRMAN
REYNALDO A. VILLAR AND COMMISSIONER JUANITO G.
ESPINO, JR., Respondent.
G.R. No. 196529, July 01, 2013 - WILLIAM T. GO,
Petitioner, v. ALBERTO T. LOOYUKO, SUBSTITUTED BY
HIS LEGAL HEIRS TERESITA C. LOOYUKO, ALBERTO
LOOYUKO, JR., ABRAHAM LOOYUKO AND STEPHANIE
LOOYUKO (MINORS, REPRESENTED BY THEIR MOTHER
TERESITA LOOYUKO), ALVIN, AMOS, AARON, DAVID,
SOLOMON AND NOAH, ALL SURNAMED PADECIO,
Respondents.
G.R. No. 172206, July 03, 2013 - OFFICE OF THE
OMBUDSMAN, Petitioner, v. ERNESTO M. DE CHAVEZ,
ROLANDO L. LONTOC, SR., DR. PORFIRIO C. LIGAYA,
ROLANDO L. LONTOC, JR. AND GLORIA M. MENDOZA,
Respondents.
G.R. No. 180281, July 01, 2013 - PEOPLE OF THE
PHILIPPINES, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. JOEMARIE
JALBONIAN alias Budo, Accused-Appellant.
G.R. No. 183805, July 03, 2013 - JAMES WALTER P.
CAPILI, Petitioner, v. PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES
AND SHIRLEY TISMO-CAPILI, Respondents.
G.R. No. 201061, July 03, 2013 - SALLY
On February 5, 2008, respondent filed an Omnibus Motion11 praying that he be allowed to present
evidence to support his motion; that his motion to quash be granted; and that the case be dismissed.
Respondent moved for the quashal of the information on two grounds, to wit: (1) that the facts do not
charge the offense of bigamy; and (2) that the criminal action or liability has been extinguished.12
On September 4, 2008, the RTC13 issued an Order14 denying respondents Omnibus Motion. The RTC
held that the facts alleged in the information that there was a valid marriage between respondent and
Modina and without such marriage having been dissolved, respondent contracted a second marriage
with Alagon constitute the crime of bigamy. The trial court further held that neither can the
information be quashed on the ground that criminal liability has been extinguished, because the
declaration of nullity of the first marriage is not one of the modes of extinguishing criminal liability.
Respondents motion for reconsideration was likewise denied in an Order15 dated February 20, 2009.
Aggrieved, respondent instituted a special civil action on certiorari under Rule 65 of the Rules of Court16
before the CA, assailing the denial of his motion to quash the information despite the fact that his first
marriage with Modina was declared null and void ab initio prior to the filing of the bigamy case.17
On December 17, 2009, the CA rendered the assailed decision, the dispositive portion of which reads: cralavvonlinelawlibrary
WHEREFORE, premises considered, the instant petition for certiorari is hereby
GRANTED. The RTC, Branch 27, Manila is hereby ordered to give due course to and
receive evidence on the petitioners motion to quash and resolve the case with dispatch.
SO ORDERED.18
The CA applied the conclusion made by the Court in Morigo v. People,19 and held that there is cogent
basis in looking into the motion to quash filed by respondent, for if the evidence would establish that his
first marriage was indeed void ab initio, one essential element of the crime of bigamy would be
lacking.20 The appellate court further held that respondent is even better off than Morigo which thus
calls for the application of such doctrine, considering that respondent contracted the second marriage
after filing the petition for the declaration of nullity of his first marriage and he obtained the favorable
declaration before the complaint for bigamy was filed against him.21 The CA thus concluded that the RTC
gravely abused its discretion in denying respondents motion to quash the information, considering that
the facts alleged in the information do not charge an offense.22
With the denial of the motion for reconsideration before the CA, petitioner filed a petition before the
Court in this petition for review on certiorari under Rule 45 of the Rules of Court based on the following
grounds: cralavvonlinelawlibrary
THE COURT OF APPEALS COMMITTED REVERSIBLE ERROR WHEN IT RENDERED ITS
DECISION DATED DECEMBER 17, 2009 GRANTING RESPONDENTS PETITION FOR
CERTIORARI AND THE RESOLUTION DATED MARCH 4, 2010 DENYING PETITIONERS
MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION, CONSIDERING THAT: cralavvonlinelawlibrary
I.
THE INFORMATION CHARGING RESPONDENT OF BIGAMY SUFFICIENTLY
ALLEGES ALL THE ELEMENTS CONSTITUTING SAID OFFENSE.
II.
THE SUBSEQUENT COURT JUDGMENT DECLARING RESPONDENTS FIRST
MARRIAGE VOID AB INITIO DID NOT EXTINGUISH RESPONDENTS
CRIMINAL LIABILITY WHICH ALREADY ATTACHED PRIOR TO SAID
JUDGMENT.23
The petition is meritorious.
The issues are not novel and have been squarely ruled upon by this Court in Montaez v.
Cipriano,24Teves v. People,25 and Antone v. Beronilla.26
In Montaez, respondent Cipriano married Socrates in April 1976, but during the subsistence of their
marriage on January 24, 1983, respondent married Silverio. In 2001, respondent filed a petition for the
annulment of her marriage with Socrates on the ground of psychological incapacity which was granted
on July 18, 2003. On May 14, 2004, petitioner filed a complaint for bigamy against respondent. The
latter, however, moved for the quashal of the information and dismissal of the criminal complaint
alleging that her first marriage had already been declared void ab initio prior to the filing of the bigamy
case.
In Teves, petitioner married Thelma on November 26, 1992. During the subsistence of their marriage
on December 10, 2001, he again married Edita. On May 4, 2006, petitioner obtained a declaration of
her marriage with Thelma null and void on the ground that the latter is physically incapacitated to
comply with her marital obligations. On June 8, 2006, an Information for Bigamy was filed against
petitioner. The court eventually convicted petitioner of the crime charged.
In Antone, petitioner married respondent in 1978, but during the subsistence of their marriage,
respondent contracted a second marriage in 1991. On April 26, 2007, respondent obtained a
declaration of nullity of her first marriage which decision became final and executory on May 15, 2007.
On June 21, 2007, the prosecution filed an information for bigamy against respondent which the latter
sought to be quashed on the ground that the facts charged do not constitute an offense.
The present case stemmed from similar procedural and factual antecedents as in the above cases. As in
Antone and Montaez, respondent moved to quash the information on the grounds that the facts do not
charge the offense of bigamy and that his criminal liability has been extinguished both because of the
declaration of nullity of the first marriage. The RTC refused to quash the information. On petition for
certiorari, the CA, however, reached a different conclusion.
As defined in Antone, a motion to quash information is the mode by which an accused assails the
validity of a criminal complaint or information filed against him for insufficiency on its face in point of
law, or for defects which are apparent in the face of the information. It is a hypothetical admission of
the facts alleged in the information. The fundamental test in determining the sufficiency of the material
GO-
BANGAYAN, Petitioner, v. BENJAMIN BANGAYAN, JR.,
Respondent.
A.M. No. P-09-2690 [Formerly A.M. OCA IPI No. 08-
2889-P], July 09, 2013 - OFFICE OF THE COURT
ADMINISTRATOR, Complainant, v. NOEL R. ONG,
DEPUTY SHERIFF, BRANCH 49, AND ALVIN A.
BUENCAMINO, DEPUTY SHERIFF, BRANCH 53 OF THE
METROPOLITAN TRIAL COURT, CALOOCAN CITY,
Respondents.
G.R. No. 195481, July 10, 2013 - ORIENTAL
PETROLEUM AND MINERALS CORPORATION, Petitioner,
v. TUSCAN REALTY, INC., Respondent.
A.M. No. 08-5-305-RTC, July 09, 2013 - RE: FAILURE
OF FORMER JUDGE ANTONIO A. CARBONELL TO DECIDE
CASES SUBMITTED FOR DECISION AND TO RESOLVE
PENDING MOTIONS IN THE REGIONAL TRIAL COURT,
BRANCH 27, SAN FERNANDO, LA UNION.
G.R. No. 203241, July 10, 2013 - RIZAL COMMERCIAL
BANKING CORPORATION, Petitioner, v. FEDERICO A.
SERRA, Respondent.
G.R. No. 202709, July 03, 2013 - PEOPLE OF THE
PHILIPPINES, Appellee, v. ROMEO ONIZA Y ONG AND
MERCY ONIZA Y CABARLE, Appellants.
A.M. No. CA-13-51-J, July 02, 2013 - RE: LETTER
COMPLAINT OF MERLITA B. FABIANA AGAINST
PRESIDING JUSTICE ANDRES B. REYES, JR.,
ASSOCIATE JUSTICES ISAIAS P. DICDICAN AND
STEPHEN C. CRUZ; CARAG JAMORA SOMERA AND
VILLAREAL LAW OFFICES AND ITS LAWYERS ATTYS.
ELPIDIO C. JAMORA, JR. AND BEATRIZ O. GERONILLA-
VILLEGAS, LAWYERS FOR MAGSAYSAY MARITIME
CORPORATION AND VISAYAN SURETY AND INSURANCE
CORPORATION.
G.R. No. 188711, July 08, 2013 - TAN BROTHERS
CORPORATION OF BASILAN CITY THROUGH ITS
OWNER/MANAGER, MAURO F. TAN, Petitioners, v.
EDNA R. ESCUDERO, Respondent.
G.R. No. 197789, July 08, 2013 - PNOC-ENERGY
DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION AND/OR PAUL A.
AQUINO, FRANCIS A. PALAFOX, Petitioners, v.
JOSELITO L. ESTRELLA, Respondent.
G.R. No. 185734, July 03, 2013 - ALFREDO C. LIM,
JR., Petitioner, v. SPOUSES TITO S. LAZARO AND
CARMEN T. LAZARO, Respondents.
G.R. No. 198680, July 08, 2013 - HEIRS OF
MAGDALENO YPON, NAMELY, ALVARO YPON, ERUDITA
Y. BARON, CICERO YPON, WILSON YPON, VICTOR
YPON, AND HINIDINO Y. PEALOSA, Petitioners, v.
GAUDIOSO PONTERAS RICAFORTE A.K.A. GAUDIOSO
E. YPON, AND THE REGISTER OF DEEDS OF TOLEDO
CITY, Respondents.
A.C. No. 6490 [Formerly CBD Case No. 03-1054], July
09, 2013 - LILIA TABANG AND CONCEPCION TABANG,
Complainsnts, v. ATTY. GLENN C. GACOTT, Respondent.
A.C. No. 7749, July 08, 2013 - JOSEFINA CARANZA
VDA. DE SALDIVAR, Complainant, v. ATTY. RAMON SG
CABANES, JR., Respondent.
G.R. No. 170245, July 01, 2013 - THE HEIRS OF
SPOUSES DOMINGO TRIA AND CONSORCIA CAMANO
TRIA, Petitioners, v. LAND BANK OF THE PHILIPPINES
AND DEPARTMENT OF AGRARIAN REFORM,
Respondents.
G.R. No. 195649, July 02, 2013 - CASAN MACODE
MACQUILING, Petitioner, v. COMMISSION ON
ELECTIONS, ROMMEL ARNADO Y CAGOCO, AND LINOG
G. BALUA, Respondents.
G.R. No. 179256, July 10, 2013 - FIRST PHILIPPINE
INDUSTRIAL CORPORATION, Petitioner, v. RAQUEL M.
CALIMBAS AND LUISA P. MAHILOM, Respondents.
G.R. No. 186366, July 03, 2013 - HEIRS OF JOSE
FERNANDO, Petitioners, v. REYNALDO DE BELEN,
Respondent.
A.C. No. 6942, July 17, 2013 - SONIC STEEL
INDUSTRIES, INC., Complainant, v. ATTY. NONNATUS
P. CHUA, Respondent.
G.R. No. 177050, July 01, 2013 - CARLOS LIM,
CONSOLACION LIM, EDMUNDO LIM,* CARLITO LIM,
SHIRLEY LEODADIA DIZON,** AND ARLEEN LIM
FERNANDEZ, Petitioners, v. DEVELOPMENT BANK OF
THE PHILIPPINES, Respondent.
G.R. No. 198759, July 01, 2013 - PHILIPPINE
AIRLINES, INC., Petitioner, v. COMMISSIONER OF
INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent.
G.R. Nos. 206844-45, July 23, 2013 - COALITION OF
ASSOCIATIONS OF SENIOR CITIZENS IN THE
PHILIPPINES, INC. [SENIOR CITIZENS PARTY-LIST],
REPRESENTED HEREIN BY ITS CHAIRPERSON AND
averments in an Information is whether or not the facts alleged therein, which are hypothetically
admitted, would establish the essential elements of the crime defined by law. Evidence aliunde or
matters extrinsic of the information are not to be considered.27 To be sure, a motion to quash should be
based on a defect in the information which is evident on its fact.28 Thus, if the defect can be cured by
amendment or if it is based on the ground that the facts charged do not constitute an offense, the
prosecution is given by the court the opportunity to correct the defect by amendment.29 If the motion
to quash is sustained, the court may order that another complaint or information be filed30 except when
the information is quashed on the ground of extinction of criminal liability or double jeopardy.31
An examination of the information filed against respondent, however, shows the sufficiency of the
allegations therein to constitute the crime of bigamy as it contained all the elements of the crime as
provided for in Article 34932 of the Revised Penal Code, to wit: cralavvonlinelawlibrary
(1) That the offender has been legally married; chanroblesvirtualawlibrary
(2) That the first marriage has not been legally dissolved or, in case his or her spouse is
absent, the absent spouse could not yet be presumed dead according to the Civil Code;
chanroblesvirtualawlibrary
(3) That he contracts a second or subsequent marriage; and
(4) That the second or subsequent marriage has all the essential requisites for validity.33
Here, the information contained the following allegations: (1) that respondent is legally married to
Modina; (2) that without such marriage having been legally dissolved; (3) that respondent willfully,
unlawfully, and feloniously contracted a second marriage with Alagon; and (4) that the second marriage
has all the essential requisites for validity. Respondents evidence showing the courts declaration that
his marriage to Modina is null and void from the beginning because of the absence of a marriage license
is only an evidence that seeks to establish a fact contrary to that alleged in the information that a first
valid marriage was subsisting at the time he contracted the second marriage. This should not be
considered at all, because matters of defense cannot be raised in a motion to quash.34 It is not proper,
therefore, to resolve the charges at the very outset without the benefit of a full blown trial. The issues
require a fuller examination and it would be unfair to shut off the prosecution at this stage of the
proceedings and to quash the information on the basis of the document presented by respondent.35
With the presentation of the court decree, no facts have been brought out which destroyed the prima
facie truth accorded to the allegations of the information on the hypothetical admission thereof.
Respondents motion to quash was founded on the trial courts declaration that his marriage with Modina
is null and void ab initio. He claims that with such declaration, one of the elements of the crime is
wanting. Thus, the allegations in the information do not charge the offense of bigamy, or at the very
least, such court decree extinguished his criminal liability. Both respondent and the CA heavily relied on
the Courts pronouncement in Morigo v. People36 where the accused therein was acquitted because the
elements of the crime of bigamy were incomplete. In said case, the first marriage was declared null and
void, because the parties only signed the marriage contract without the presence of a solemnizing
officer. Considering, therefore, that the declaration of nullity retroacts to the date of the first marriage,
the Court held that there was no marriage to speak of when the accused contracted the second
marriage. Logically, the accused was acquitted.
The Family Code has settled once and for all the conflicting jurisprudence on the matter. A declaration of
the absolute nullity of a marriage is now explicitly required either as a cause of action or a ground for
defense.37 It has been held in a number of cases that a judicial declaration of nullity is required before
a valid subsequent marriage can be contracted; or else, what transpires is a bigamous marriage,
reprehensible and immoral.38
What makes a person criminally liable for bigamy is when he contracts a second or subsequent marriage
during the subsistence of a valid marriage.39 Parties to the marriage should not be permitted to judge
for themselves its nullity, for the same must be submitted to the judgment of competent courts and only
when the nullity of the marriage is so declared can it be held as void, and so long as there is no such
declaration, the presumption is that the marriage exists. Therefore, he who contracts a second marriage
before the judicial declaration of nullity of the first marriage assumes the risk of being prosecuted for
bigamy.40 If we allow respondents line of defense and the CAs ratiocination, a person who commits
bigamy can simply evade prosecution by immediately filing a petition for the declaration of nullity of his
earlier marriage and hope that a favorable decision is rendered therein before anyone institutes a
complaint against him.41
Respondent, likewise, claims that there are more reasons to quash the information against him, because
he obtained the declaration of nullity of marriage before the filing of the complaint for bigamy against
him. Again, we cannot sustain such contention. In addition to the discussion above, settled is the rule
that criminal culpability attaches to the offender upon the commission of the offense and from that
instant, liability appends to him until extinguished as provided by law and that the time of filing of the
criminal complaint or information is material only for determining prescription.42
Thus, as held in Antone:
cralavvonlinelawlibrary
To conclude, the issue on the declaration of nullity of the marriage between petitioner and
respondent only after the latter contracted the subsequent marriage is, therefore,
immaterial for the purpose of establishing that the facts alleged in the information for
Bigamy does not constitute an offense. Following the same rationale, neither may such
defense be interposed by the respondent in his motion to quash by way of exception to
the established rule that facts contrary to the allegations in the information are matters of
defense which may be raised only during the presentation of evidence.43
In view of the foregoing, the CA erred in granting the petition for certiorari filed by respondent. The RTC
did not commit grave abuse of discretion in denying his motion to quash and to allow him to present
evidence to support his omnibus motion.
WHEREFORE, the petition is hereby GRANTED. The Court of Appeals Decision dated December 17,
2009 and Resolution dated March 4, 2010 in CA-G.R. SP No. 108616, are SET ASIDE. Criminal Case No.
05-235814 is REMANDED to the Regional Trial Court of Manila, Branch 27 for further proceedings.
SO ORDERED.
Velasco, Jr., (Chairperson), Abad, Mendoza, and Leonen, JJ., concur.
July 26, 2013
FIRST NOMINEE, FRANCISCO G. DATOL, JR., Petitioner, N O T I C E OF J U D G M E N T
v. COMMISSION ON ELECTIONS, Respondent.; G. R. NO.
206982 - COALITION OF ASSOCIATIONS OF SENIOR
CITIZENS IN THE PHILIPPINES, INC. (SENIOR Sirs/Mesdames:
CITIZENS), REPRESENTED BY ITS PRESIDENT AND
cralavvonlinelawlibrary

INCUMBENT REPRESENTATIVE IN THE HOUSE OF

Please take notice that on July 17, 2013 a Decision, copy attached herewith, was rendered by the
REPRESENTATIVES, ATTY. GODOFREDO V. ARQUIZA,
Petitioner, v. COMMISSION ON ELECTIONS, Supreme Court in the above-entitled case, the original of which was received by this Office on July 26,
Respondent. 2013 at 10:25 a.m.

G.R. No. 191247, July 10, 2013 - FRANCISCO L. Very truly yours,
ROSARIO, JR., Petitioner, v. LELLANI DE GUZMAN, (SGD)
ARLEEN DE GUZMAN, PHILIP RYAN DE GUZMAN, AND LUCITA
ROSELLA DE GUZMAN BAUTISTA, Respondents. ABJELINA
SORIANO
G.R. No. 189686, July 15, 2013 - UNIVERSAL ROBINA Division Clerk of
CORPORATION AND LANCE Y. GOKONGWEI, Court
Petitioners, v. WILFREDO Z. CASTILLO, Respondent.

G.R. No. 191411, July 15, 2013 - RAFAEL L.

COSCOLLUELA, Petitioner, v. SANDIGANBAYAN (FIRST
Endnotes:
DIVISION) AND PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES,
Respondents.
1 Penned by Associate Justice Remedios A. Salazar-Fernando, with Associate Justices
G.R. No. 202867, July 15, 2013 - PEOPLE OF THE
PHILIPPINES, Appellee, v. REGIE LABIAGA, Appellant. Isaias P. Dicdican and Romeo F. Barza, concurring; rollo, pp. 37A-47. cralawlibrary

G.R. No. 196741, July 17, 2013 - PHILIPPINE 2 Id. at 48-49. cralawlibrary

TOURISM AUTHORITY (Now known AS TOURISM

INFRASTRUCTURE AND ENTERPRISE ZONE 3 Records, p. 8.
AUTHORITY), Petitioner, v. MARCOSA A. SABANDAL-
cralawlibrary

HERZENSTIEL, PEDRO TAPALES, LUIS TAPALES, AND 4 Id. at 7.

ROMEO TAPALES, Respondents. cralawlibrary

G.R. No. 176111, July 12, 2013 - CAROLINA B. JOSE, 5Rollo, p. 144. cralawlibrary

Petitioner, v. PURITA SUAREZ, Respondent.

6 Records, pp. 15-19.
G.R. No. 192306, July 15, 2013 - JESSIE G.
cralawlibrary

MARTINEZ, Petitioner, v. CENTRAL PANGASINAN 7 Id. at 5.

ELECTRIC COOPERATIVE, INC. (CENPELCO), cralawlibrary

Respondent.
8 Id. at 4-6. cralawlibrary

G.R. No. 179334, July 01, 2013 - SECRETARY OF THE

DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS AND HIGHWAYS AND 9 Id. at 1-2.
DISTRICT ENGINEER CELESTINO R. CONTRERAS,
cralawlibrary

Petitioners, v. SPOUSES HERACLEO AND RAMONA 10 Id. at 1.

TECSON, Respondents. cralawlibrary

G.R. No. 179786, July 24, 2013 - JOSIELENE LARA 11 Id. at 66-71. cralawlibrary

CHAN, Petitioner, v. JOHNNY T. CHAN, Respondent.

12 Id. at 66.
G.R. No. 186264, July 08, 2013 - DR. LORNA
cralawlibrary

C.FORMARAN, Petitioner, v. DR. GLENDA B. ONG AND 13 Branch 27, Manila.

SOLOMON S. ONG, Respondents. cralawlibrary

G.R. No. 191068, July 17, 2013 - PEOPLE OF THE 14 Penned by Judge Teresa P. Soriaso; records, pp. 104-105. cralawlibrary

PHILIPPINES, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. CHRIS CORPUZ Y

BASBAS, Accused-Appellant. 15 Records, pp. 121-122. cralawlibrary

G.R. No. 175142, July 22, 2013 - BONIFACIO WATER 16 CA rollo, pp. 2-26.
CORPORATION (FORMERLY BONIFACIO VIVENDI cralawlibrary

WATER CORPORATION), Petitioner, v. THE

COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent. 17 Id. at 9. cralawlibrary

G.R. No. 200895, July 31, 2013 - ROLANDO M. 18Rollo, p. 46. (Emphasis in the original)
MENDIOLA, Petitioner, v. COMMERZ TRADING INTL.,
INC., Respondent. 19 466 Phil. 1013 (2004). cralawlibrary

G.R. No. 199294, July 31, 2013 - RALPH LITO W.

LOPEZ, Petitioner, v. PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES, 20Rollo, p. 44. cralawlibrary

Respondent.
21 Id. at 44-45.
G.R. No. 206505, July 24, 2013 - JEREME G.
cralawlibrary

VILLANUEVA, SR., Petitioner, v. BALIWAG 22 Id. at 46.

NAVIGATION, INC., VICTORIA VDA. DE TENGCO AND cralawlibrary

UNITRA MARITIME CO., LTD., Respondent.

23 Id. at 16-17. cralawlibrary

G.R. No. 188500, July 24, 2013 - PROVINCE OF

CAGAYAN, REPRESENTED BY HON. ALVARO T. 24 G.R. No. 181089, October 22, 2012, 684 SCRA 315.
ANTONIO, GOVERNOR, AND ROBERT ADAP,
cralawlibrary

ENVIRONMENTAL AND NATURAL RESOURCES OFFICER, 25 G.R. No. 188775, August 24, 2011, 656 SCRA 307.
Petitioners, v. JOSEPH LASAM LARA, Respondent. cralawlibrary

G.R. No. 193874, July 24, 2013 - REPUBLIC OF THE 26 G.R. No. 183824, December 8, 2010, 637 SCRA 615. cralawlibrary

PHILIPPINES, Petitioner, v. RICORDITO N. DE ASIS,

JR., Respondent. 27People v. Balao, G.R. No. 176819, January 26, 2011, 640 SCRA 565, 573; Go v. The
Fifth Division, Sandiganbayan, 549 Phil. 783, 805 (2007).
G.R. No. 172346, July 24, 2013 - SPOUSES NAMEAL
cralawlibrary

AND LOURDES BONROSTRO, Petitioners, v. SPOUSES

28Santos v. People, G.R. No. 173176, August 26, 2008, 563 SCRA 341, 368.
JUAN AND CONSTANCIA LUNA, Respondents. cralawlibrary

A.M. OCA IPI No. 02-1321-P, July 16, 2013 - 29 The Revised Rules of Criminal Procedure, Rule 117, Section 4. cralawlibrary

CONCERNED CITIZEN, Complainant, v. NONITA V.

CATENA, COURT STENOGRAPHER III, REGIONAL TRIAL 30 The Revised Rules of Criminal Procedure, Rule 117, Section 5.
COURT, BRANCH 50, PUERTO PRINCESA, PALAWAN,
cralawlibrary

Respondent.
31 The Revised Rules of Criminal Procedure, Rule 117, Section 6. cralawlibrary

A.C. No. 6664, July 16, 2013 - FERDINAND A.

SAMSON, Complainant, v. ATTY. EDGARDO O. ERA,
Respondent.
G.R. No. 191566, July 17, 2013 - PEOPLE OF THE
PHILIPPINES, Petitioner, v. EDGARDO V. ODTUHAN,
32 Art. 349. Bigamy. The penalty of prision mayor shall be imposed upon any person
who shall contract a second or subsequent marriage before the former marriage has been
legally dissolved, or before the absent spouse has been declared presumptively dead by
means of a judgment rendered in the proper proceedings.
cralawlibrary

Respondent. 33Nollora, Jr. v. People, G.R. No. 191425, September 7, 2011, 657 SCRA 330, 342; Teves
G.R. No. 197537, July 24, 2013 - PEOPLE OF THE v. People, supra note 25, at 312; Antone v. Beronilla, supra note 26, at 627-628. cralawlibrary

PHILIPPINES, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. NINOY ROSALES Y

ESTO, Accused-Appellant. 34Antone v. Beronilla, supra note 26, at 628. cralawlibrary

G.R. No. 190340, July 24, 2013 - PEOPLE OF THE 35

PHILIPPINES, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. ROGELIO RAMOS Id. at 627. cralawlibrary

AND MARISSA INTERO RAMOS, Accused-Appellants.

36 Supra note 19. cralawlibrary

G.R. No. 179638, July 08, 2013 - HEIRS OF

NUMERIANO MIRANDA, SR., namely: CIRILA 37Teves v. People, supra note 25, at 313.
(deceased), CORNELIO, NUMERIANO, JR., ERLINDA,
cralawlibrary

LOLITA, RUFINA, DANILO, ALEJANDRO, FELIMON, 38

TERESITA, ELIZABETH AND ANALIZA, ALL SURNAMED Id. at 313-314. cralawlibrary

MIRANDA, Petitioners, v. PABLO R. MIRANDA,

39Montaez v. Cipriano, supra note 24, at 325.
Respondent. cralawlibrary

G.R. No. 173587, July 15, 2013 - ZUELLIG PHARMA 40 Id. at 325-326.
CORPORATION, Petitioner, v. ALICE M. SIBAL, MA.
cralawlibrary

TERESA J. BARISO, PRESCILLANO L. GONZALES, LAURA 41Teves

B. BERNARDO, MAMERTA R. ZITA, JOSEPHINE JUDY C. v. People, supra note 25, at 314. cralawlibrary

GARCIA, MENDOZA,* AND MA. ASUNCION B. HERCE,

42 Id.
EDITHA D. CARPITANOS, MA. LUZ B. BUENO, DANTE C. cralawlibrary

VERASTIGUE,** AGNES R. ALCOBER, ARWIN Y. CRUZ,

ADONIS F. OCAMPO, SOPHIA P. ANGELES, JOEL B. 43Antone v. Beronilla, supra note 26, at 632. (Italics in the original)
BUSTAMANTE, EDITHA B. COLE, LUDIVINA C. PACIA,
ROSELLE M. DIZON, RODOLFO A. ABCEDE, WILFREDO
RICAFRENTE, RODOLFO R. ROBERTO, ROSALIE R.
LUNAR, BENJAMIN R. CALAYCAY, GUILLERO YAP
CADORNA, THROVADORE TOBOSO, CAROLINA S. UY,
Ads by Google Marriage Law GR In Annulment
MARIA LORETTO M. REGIS, ALMAR C. CALUAG,** Ads by Google Case GR Judge VS Republic VS
VILMA R. SAPIWOSO, ANATALIA L. CALPITO, FELIPE S. Ads by Google No GR Court Cases GR V
CALINAWAN, VIVIELIZA DELMAR MANULAT, MA. LIZA
L. RAFINAN,** AMMIE V. GATILAO, ALEX B. SADAYA
AND REGINO EDDIE PANGA, Respondents.
Back to Home | Back to Main
G.R. No. 174912, July 24, 2013 - BPI EMPLOYEES
UNION-DAVAO CITY-FUBU (BPIEU-DAVAO CITY-FUBU),
Petitioner, v. BANK OF THE PHILIPPINE ISLANDS
(BPI), AND BPI OFFICERS CLARO M. REYES, CECIL QUICK SEARCH
CONANAN AND GEMMA VELEZ, Respondents.

G.R. No. 197360, July 03, 2013 - PEOPLE OF THE

PHILIPPINES, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. RONALD CREDO 1901 1902 1903 1904 1905 1906 1907 1908
AKA ONTOG, RANDY CREDO AND ROLANDO CREDO Y
SAN BUENAVENTURA, Accused-Appellants. 1909 1910 1911 1912 1913 1914 1915 1916
1917 1918 1919 1920 1921 1922 1923 1924
G.R. No. 199082, G.R. NO. 199085, G.R. NO. 199118,
July 23, 2013 - JOSE MIGUEL T. ARROYO, Petitioner, v. 1925 1926 1927 1928 1929 1930 1931 1932
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE; COMMISSION ON 1933 1934 1935 1936 1937 1938 1939 1940
ELECTIONS; HON. LEILA DE LIMA, IN HER CAPACITY AS
SECRETARY OF THE DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE; HON. 1941 1942 1943 1944 1945 1946 1947 1948
SIXTO BRILLANTES, JR., IN HIS CAPACITY AS 1949 1950 1951 1952 1953 1954 1955 1956
CHAIRPERSON OF THE COMMISSION ON ELECTIONS;
AND THE JOINT DOJ-COMELEC PRELIMINARY 1957 1958 1959 1960 1961 1962 1963 1964
INVESTIGATION COMMITTEE AND FACT-FINDING 1965 1966 1967 1968 1969 1970 1971 1972
TEAM, Respondents.; G.R. NO. 199085 - BENJAMIN S.
ABALOS, SR., Petitioner, v. HON. LEILA DE LIMA, IN 1973 1974 1975 1976 1977 1978 1979 1980
HER CAPACITY AS SECRETARY OF JUSTICE; HON. 1981 1982 1983 1984 1985 1986 1987 1988
SIXTO S. BRILLANTES, JR., IN HIS CAPACITY AS
COMELEC CHAIRPERSON; RENE V. SARMIENTO, 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996
LUCENITO N. TAGLE, ARMANDO V. VELASCO, ELIAS R. 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004
YUSOPH, CHRISTIAN ROBERT S. LIM AND AUGUSTO C.
LAGMAN, IN THEIR CAPACITY AS COMELEC 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012
COMMISSIONERS; CLARO A. ARELLANO, GEORGE C. 2013 2014 2015 2016
DEE, JACINTO G. ANG, ROMEO B. FORTES AND
MICHAEL D. VILLARET, IN THEIR CAPACITY AS
CHAIRPERSON AND MEMBERS, RESPECTIVELY, OF THE
JOINT DOJ-COMELEC PRELIMINARY INVESTIGATION
COMMITTEE ON THE 2004 AND 2007 ELECTION FRAUD
RESPONDENTS.; G.R. NO. 199118 - GLORIA
MACAPAGAL-ARROYO, Petitioner, v. COMMISSION ON Main Indices of the Library ---> Go!
ELECTIONS, REPRESENTED BY CHAIRPERSON SIXTO S.
BRILLANTES, JR., DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE,
REPRESENTED BY SECRETARY LEILA M. DE LIMA, JOINT
DOJ-COMELEC PRELIMINARY INVESTIGATION
COMMITTEE, SENATOR AQUILINO M. PIMENTEL III,
AND DOJ-COMELEC FACT-FINDING TEAM, Respondents.

G.R. No. 175844, July 29, 2013 - BANK OF THE

PHILIPPINE ISLANDS, Petitioner, v. SARABIA MANOR
HOTEL CORPORATION, Respondent.

G.R. No. 192571, July 23, 2013 - ABBOTT

LABORATORIES, PHILIPPINES, CECILLE A. TERRIBLE,
EDWIN D. FEIST, MARIA OLIVIA T. YABUT-MISA,
TERESITA C. BERNARDO, AND ALLAN G. ALMAZAR,
Petitioners, v. PEARLIE ANN F. ALCARAZ, Respondent.

A.M. No. 11-10-03-0, July 30, 2013 - RE: LETTER

DATED APRIL 18, 2011 OF CHIEF PUBLIC ATTORNEY
PERSIDA RUEDA-ACOSTA REQUESTING EXEMPTION
FROM THE PAYMENT OF SHERIFFS EXPENSES

G.R. No. 179607, July 24, 2013 - CIRILA MANOTA,

FOR HERSELF AND IN BEHALF OF HER CHILDREN,
CLAIRE, CATHERINE, CHARLES, PHILIP CHRISTOPHER,
CARMI JOY, CARLO JOHN AND CEDRIC JAMES,
Petitioners, v. AVANTGARDE SHIPPING CORPORATION
AND/OR SEMBAWANG JOHNSON MANAGEMENT PTE.,
LTD, Respondents.

G.R. No. 185740, July 23, 2013 - THE PROVINCIAL

GOVERNMENT OF CAMARINES NORTE, REPRESENTED
BY GOVERNOR JESUS O. TYPOCO, JR., Petitioner, v.
BEATRIZ O. GONZALES, Respondent.

G.R. No. 179146, July 23, 2013 - HOLY CHILD

CATHOLIC SCHOOL, Petitioner, v. HON. PATRICIA STO.
TOMAS, IN HER OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS SECRETARY OF
THE DEPARTMENT OF LABOR AND EMPLOYMENT, AND
PINAG-ISANG TINIG AT LAKAS NG ANAKPAWIS HOLY
CHILD CATHOLIC SCHOOL TEACHERS AND EMPLOYEES
LABOR UNION (HCCS-TELU-PIGLAS), Respondents.

G.R. No. 170677, July 31, 2013 - VSD REALTY &

DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, Petitioner, v. UNIWIDE
SALES, INC. AND DOLORES BAELLO TEJAD,
Respondents.

G.R. No. 183608, July 13, 2013 - FAUSTINO T.

CHINGKOE AND GLORIA CHINGKOE, Petitioners, v.
REPUBLIC OF THE PHILIPPINES, REPRESENTED BY THE
BUREAU OF CUSTOMS, Respondent.

G.R. No. 203585, July 29, 2013 - MILA CABOVERDE

TANTANO AND ROSELLER CABOVERDE, Petitioners, v.
DOMINALDA ESPINACABOVERDE, EVE CABOVERDE-YU,
FE CABOVERDE-LABRADOR, AND JOSEPHINE E.
CABOVERDE, Respondents.

G.R. No. 194709, July 31, 2013 - MINETTE BAPTISTA,

BANNIE EDSEL SAN MIGUEL, AND MA. FE DAYON,
Petitioners, v. ROSARIO VILLANUEVA, JANETTE
ROLDAN, DANILO OLAYVAR, ONOFRE ESTRELLA,
CATALINO LEDDA, MANOLO GUBANGCO, GILBERT
ORIBIANA, CONSTANCIO SANTIAGO, RUTH BAYQUEN,
RUBY CASTANEDA, ALFRED LANDAS, JR., ROSELYN
GARCES, EUGENE CRUZ, MENANDRO SAMSON,
FEDERICO MUNOZ AND SALVADOR DIWA,
Respondents.

G.R. No. 172846, July 24, 2013 - MANILA POLO CLUB

EMPLOYEES UNION (MPCEU) FUR-TUCP, Petitioner, v.
MANILA POLO CLUB, INC., Respondent.

G.R. No. 189028, July 16, 2013 - NATIONAL ARTIST

FOR LITERATURE VIRGILIO ALMARIO, NATIONAL
ARTIST FOR LITERATURE BIENVENIDO LUMBERA,
NATIONAL ARTIST FOR VISUAL ARTS (PAINTING)
BENEDICTO CABRERA, NATIONAL ARTIST FOR VISUAL
ARTS (SCULPTURE) NAPOLEON ABUEVA, NATIONAL
ARTIST FOR VISUAL ARTS (PAINTING AND
SCULPTURE) ARTURO LUZ, NATIONAL ARTIST FOR
PRODUCTION DESIGN SALVADOR BERNAL,
UNIVERSITY PROFESSOR EMERITUS GEMINO ABAD,
DEAN MARVIC M.V.F. LEONEN (UP COLLEGE OF LAW),
DEAN DANILO SILVESTRE (UP COLLEGE OF
ARCHITECTURE), DEAN ROLAND TOLENTINO (UP
COLLEGE OF MASS COMMUNICATION), PROF. JOSE
DALISAY, DR. ANTON JUAN, DR. ALEXANDER CORTEZ,
DR. JOSE NEIL GARCIA, DR. PEDRO JUN CRUZ REYES,
PROF. JOSE CLAUDIO GUERRERO, PROF. MICHAEL M.
COROZA, PROF. GERARD LICO, PROF. VERNE DE LA
PENA, PROF. MARIAN ABUAN, PROF. THEODORE O. TE,
DR. CRISTINA PANTOJA-HIDALGO, PROF. JOSE
WENDELL CAPILI, PROF. SIR ANRIAL TIATCO, PROF.
NICOLO DEL CASTILLO, PROF. HORACIO DUMANLIG,
PROF. DANTON REMOTO, PROF. PRISCELINA PATAJO-
LEGASTO, PROF. BELEN CALINGACION, PROF. AMIEL Y.
LEONARDIA, PROF. VIM NADERA, PROF. MARILYN
CANTA, PROF. CECILIA DELA PAZ, PROF. CHARLSON
ONG, PROF. CLOD MARLON YAMBAO, PROF. KENNETH
JAMANDRE, PROF. JETHRO JOAQUIN, ATTY. F.D.
NICOLAS B. PICHAY, ATTY. ROSE BEATRIX ANGELES,
MR. FERNANDO JOSEF, MS. SUSAN S. LARA, MR.
ALFRED YUSON, MS. JING PANGANIBAN-MENDOZA,
MR. ROMULO BAQUIRAN, JR., MR. CARLJOE JAVIER,
MS. REBECCA T. ANONUEVO, MR. JP ANTHONY D.
CUNADA, MS. LEAH NAVARRO, MR. MARK MEILLY, MR.
VERGEL O. SANTOS, MR. GIL OLEA MENDOZA, MR.
EDGAR C. SAMAR, MS. CHRISTINE BELLEN, MR. ANGELO
R. LACUESTA, MS. ANNA MARIA KATIGBAK-LACUESTA,
MR. LEX LEDESMA, MS. KELLY PERIQUET, MS. CARLA
PACIS, MR. J. ALBERT GAMBOA, MR. CESAR
EVANGELISTA BUENDIA, MR. PAOLO ALCAZAREN, MR.
ALWYN C. JAVIER, MR. RAYMOND MAGNO GARLITOS,
MS. GANG BADOY, MR. LESLIE BOCOBO, MS. FRANCES
BRETANA, MS. JUDITH TORRES, MS. JANNETTE
PINZON, MS. JUNE POTICAR-DALISAY, MS. CAMILLE DE
LA ROSA, MR. JAMES LADIORAY, MR. RENATO
CONSTANTINO, JR., AND CONCERNED ARTISTS OF THE
PHILIPPINES (CAP), Petitioners, v. THE EXECUTIVE
SECRETARY, THE SECRETARY OF THE DEPARTMENT OF
BUDGET AND MANAGEMENT, THE CULTURAL CENTER
OF THE PHILIPPINES, THE NATIONAL COMMISSION ON
CULTURE AND THE ARTS, MS. CECILE GUIDOTE-
ALVAREZ, MR. CARLO MAGNO JOSE CAPARAS,1 MR.
JOSE MORENO, MR. FRANCISCO MAOSA, AND ALL
PERSONS, PUBLIC AND PRIVATE, ACTING UNDER
THEIR INSTRUCTIONS, DIRECTION, CONTROL AND
SUPERVISION IN RELATION TO THE CONFERMENT OF
THE ORDER OF THE NATIONAL ARTIST AND THE
RELEASE OF FUNDS IN RELATION TO THE CONFERMENT
OF THE HONORS AND PRIVILEGES OF THE ORDER OF
NATIONAL ARTISTS ON RESPONDENTS GUIDOTE-
ALVAREZ, CAPARAS, MORENO AND MAOSA,
Respondents.

G.R. No. 189316, July 01, 2013 - PHILIPPINE

NATIONAL BANK, Petitioner, v. SPOUSES BERNARD
AND CRESENCIA MARAON, Respondents.

G.R. No. 184908, July 03, 2013 - MAJOR JOEL G.

CANTOS, Petitioner, v. PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES,
Respondent.
 G.R. No. 192394, July 03, 2013 - ROY D. PASOS,
Petitioner, v. PHILIPPINE NATIONAL CONSTRUCTION
CORPORATION, Respondent.

G.R. No. 177763, July 03, 2013 - PEOPLE OF THE

PHILIPPINES, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. GARY VERGARA Y
ORIEL AND JOSEPH INOCENCIO1 y PAULINO, Accused-
Appellants.

G.R. No. 181277, July 03, 2013 - SWEDISH MATCH

PHILIPPINES, INC., Petitioner, v. THE TREASURER OF
THE CITY OF MANILA, Respondent.

G.R. No. 198240, July 03, 2013 - LUISA NAVARRO

MARCOS*, Petitioner, v. THE HEIRS OF THE LATE DR.
ANDRES NAVARRO, JR., NAMELY NONITA NAVARRO,
FRANCISCA NAVARRO MALAPITAN, SOLEDAD
NAVARRO BROCHLER, NONITA BARRUN NAVARRO, JR.,
IMELDA NAVARRO, ANDRES NAVARRO III, MILAGROS
NAVARRO YAP, PILAR NAVARRO, TERESA NAVARRO-
TABITA, AND LOURDES BARRUN-REJUSO, Respondents.

G.R. No. 188217, July 03, 2013 - FERNANDO M.

ESPINO, Petitioner, v. PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES,
Respondent.

G.R. No. 199932, July 03, 2013 - CAMILO A.

ESGUERRA, Petitioner, v. UNITED PHILIPPINES LINES,
INC., BELSHIPS MANAGEMENT (SINGAPORE) PTE LTD.,
AND/OR FERNANDO T. LISING, Respondents.

G.R. No. 159213, July 03, 2013 - VECTOR SHIPPING

CORPORATION AND FRANCISCO SORIANO, Petitioners,
v. AMERICAN HOME ASSURANCE COMPANY AND
SULPICIO LINES, INC., Respondents.

G.R. No. 198534, July 03, 2013 - JENNY F. PECKSON,

Petitioner, v. ROBINSONS SUPERMARKET
CORPORATION, JODY GADIA, ROENA SARTE, AND RUBY
ALEX, Respondents.

G.R. No. 192179, July 03, 2013 - PEOPLE OF THE

PHILIPPINES, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. LITO HATSERO,
Accused-Appellant.

G.R. No. 182349, July 24, 2013 - REMAN RECIO,

Petitioner, v. HEIRS OF THE SPOUSES AGUEDO AND
MARIA ALTAMIRANO, NAMELY: ALEJANDRO,
ADELAIDA, CATALINA, ALFREDO, FRANCISCO, ALL
SURNAMED ALTAMIRANO; VIOLETA ALTAMIRANO
OLFATO, AND LORETA ALTAMIRANO VDA. DE MARALIT
AND SPOUSES LAURO AND MARCELINA LAJARCA,
Respondents.

G.R. No. 185160, July 24, 2013 - POLYMER RUBBER

CORPORATION AND JOSEPH ANG, Petitioners, v.
BAYOLO SALAMUDING, Respondent.

G.R. No. 192896, July 24, 2013 - DREAM VILLAGE

NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATION, INC., REPRESENTED
BY ITS INCUMBENT PRESIDENT, GREG SERIEGO,
Petitioner, v. BASES CONVERSION DEVELOPMENT
AUTHORITY, Respondent.

A.C. No. 7686, July 31, 2013 - JAIME JOVEN AND

REYNALDO C. RASING, Ccomplainants, v. ATTYS.
PABLO R. CRUZ AND FRANKIE O. MAGSALIN III,
Respondents.

G.R. No. 181539, July 24, 2013 - PEOPLE OF THE

PHILIPPINES, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. EDWIN ALEMAN Y
LONGHAS, Accused-Appellant.

G.R. No. 188046, July 24, 2013 - LAND BANK OF THE

PHILIPPINES, Petitioner, v. AMERICAN RUBBER
CORPORATION, Respondent.

G.R. No. 181163, July 24, 2013 - ASIAN TERMINALS,

INC., Petitioner, v. PHILAM INSURANCE CO., INC.
(NOW CHARTIS PHILIPPINES INSURANCE, INC.),
Respondent.

G.R. No. 181444, July 17, 2013 - BOBBY ABEL

AVELINO Y BULAWAN, Petitioner, v. PEOPLE OF THE
PHILIPPINES, Respondent.

G.R. No. 197250, July 17, 2013 - PEOPLE OF THE

PHILIPPINES, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. REYNALDO ANDY
SOMOZA Y HANDAYA, Accused-Appellant.

G.R. No. 201728, July 17, 2013 - PEOPLE OF THE

PHILIPPINES, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. MARVIN CRUZ,
Accused-Appellant.

G.R. No. 160739, July 17, 2013 - ANITA MANGILA,

Petitioner, v. JUDGE HERIBERTO M. PANGILINAN,
ASST.CITY PROSECUTOR II LUCIA JUDY SOLINAP, AND
NATIONAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION (DIRECTOR
REYNALDO WYCOCO), Respondents.

G.R. No. 173307, July 17, 2013 - PEOPLE OF THE

PHILIPPINES, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. VICTORINO REYES,
Accused-Appellant.

G.R. No. 157900, July 22, 2013 - ZUELLIG FREIGHT

AND CARGO SYSTEMS, Petitioner, v. NATIONAL LABOR
RELATIONS COMMISSION AND RONALDO V. SAN
MIGUEL, Respondents.

G.R. No. 189343, July 10, 2013 - BENILDA N.

BACASMAS, Petitioner, v. SANDIGANBAYAN AND
PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES, Respondents.; G.R. NO.
189369 - ALAN C. GAVIOLA, Petitioner, v. PEOPLE OF
THE PHILIPPINES, RESPONDENT.; G.R. NO. 189553 -
EUSTAQUIO B. CESA, Petitioner, v. PEOPLE OF THE
PHILIPPINES, Respondent.

G.R. Nos. 168951& 169000, July 17, 2013 - DR.

ROGER R. POSADAS AND DR. ROLANDO P. DAYCO,
Petitioners, v. SANDIGANBAYAN AND PEOPLE OF THE
PHILIPPINES, Respondents.

G.R. No. 201979, July 10, 2013 - GILDA C.

FERNANDEZ AND BERNADETTE A. BELTRAN,
Petitioners, v. NEWFIELD STAFF SOLUTIONS,
INC./ARNOLD JAY LOPEZ, JR., Respondents.

G.R. No. 198020, July 10, 2013 - PEOPLE OF THE

PHILIPPINES, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. JOSEPH BARRA,
Accused-Appellant.

G.R. No. 195528, July 04, 2013 - PEOPLE OF THE

PHILIPPINES, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. JOSE CLARA Y
BUHAIN, Accused-Appellant.

G.R. No. 162385, July 15, 2013 - SAMAR-MED

DISTRIBUTION, Petitioner, v. NATIONAL LABOR
RELATIONS COMMISSION, AND JOSAFAT GUTANG,
Respondents.

G.R. No. 172504, July 31, 2013 - DONNA C.

NAGTALON, Petitioner, v. UNITED COCONUT PLANTERS
BANK, Respondent.

G.R. No. 197725, July 31, 2013 - MARK ANTHONY

ESTEBAN (IN SUBSTITUTION OF THE DECEASED
GABRIEL O. ESTEBAN), Petitioner, v. SPOUSES
RODRIGO C. MARCELO AND CARMEN T. MARCELO,
Respondents.

G.R. No. 188708, July 31, 2013 - PEOPLE OF THE

PHILIPPINES, Appellee, v. ALAMADA MACABANDO,
Appellant.

G.R. No. 179326, July 31, 2013 - LUCIANO P.

CAEDO,* Petitioner, v. KAMPILAN SECURITY AND
DETECTIVE AGENCY, INC. AND RAMONCITO L.
ARQUIZA, Respondents.

G.R. No. 174978, July 31, 2013 - SALLY YOSHIZAKI,

Petitioner, v. JOY TRAINING CENTER OF AURORA, INC.,
Respondent.

A.M. No. P-10-2789 (formerly A.M. OCA IPI No. 09-

3181-P), July 31, 2013 - DEVELOPMENT BANK OF THE
PHILIPPINES, REPRESENTED BY ATTY. BENILDA A.
TEJADA, Complainant, v. DAMVIN V. FAMERO, SHERIFF
IV, REGIONAL TRIAL COURT, BRANCH 43, ROXAS,
ORIENTAL MINDORO, Respondent.

G.R. No. 165014, July 31, 2013 - HEIRS OF

ALEJANDRA DELFIN, NAMELY: LEOPOLDO DELFIN
(DECEASED), REPRESENTED BY HIS SPOUSE, LUZ C.
DELFIN, AND CHILDREN, LELANE C. DELFIN AND
ANASTACIA C. DELFIN, MARCELITO DELFIN,
FRANCISCO DELFIN, APOLLO DELFIN, ABRILES DELFIN,
LYDIA D. DACULAN, OLIVIA D. CABALLERO,
ALEJANDRO DELFIN, JULITO DELFIN, AND CANDIDO
DELFIN, JR., Petitioners, v. AVELINA RABADON,
PACIANO PANOGALING, HILARIA RABADON, PABLO
BOQUILLA, CATALINA RABADON, PACIANO RABAYA, FE
RABADON, GONZALO DABON, AND ROBERTO
RABADON, Respondents.

G.R. No. 186509, July 29, 2013 - PHILMAN MARINE

AGENCY, INC. (NOW DOHLE-PHILMAN MANNING
AGENCY, INC.) AND/OR DOHLE (IOM) LIMITED,
Petitioners, v. ARMANDO S. CABANBAN, Respondent.

G.R. No. 159371, July 29, 2013 - D. M. CONSUNJI

CORPORATION, Petitioner, v. ROGELIO P. BELLO,
Respondent.

G.R. No. 206236, July 15, 2013 - GILFREDO

BACOLOD, A.K.A. GILARDO BACOLOD, Accused-
Petitioner, v. PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES, Plaintiff-
Respondent.

G.R. No. 186610, July 29, 2013 - POLICE SENIOR

SUPERINTENDENT DIMAPINTO MACAWADIB,
Petitioner, v. THE PHILIPPINE NATIONAL POLICE
DIRECTORATE FOR PERSONNEL AND RECORDS
MANAGEMENT, Respondent.

G.R. No. 161075, July 15, 2013 - RAFAEL JOSE

CONSING, JR., Petitioner, v. PEOPLE OF THE
PHILIPPINES, Respondent.

G.R. No. 181119, July 31, 2013 - ARNEL ALICANDO Y

BRIONES, Petitioner, v. PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES,
Respondent.

G.R. No. 189570, July 31, 2013 - HEIRS OF SANTIAGO

NISPEROS, TEODORICO NISPEROS, RESTITUTA LARON,
CARMELITA H. NISPEROS, VIRGILIO H. NISPEROS,
CONCHITA H. NISPEROS, PURITA H. NISPEROS,
PEPITO H. NISPEROS, REBECCA H. NISPEROS,
ABRAHAM H. NISPEROS, IGNACIO F. NISPEROS,
RODOLFO F. NISPEROS, RAYMUNDO F. NISPEROS,
RENATO F. NISPEROS, FE N. MUNAR, BENITO F.
NISPEROS, REYNALDO N. NISPEROS, MELBA N. JOSE,
ELY N. GADIANO, REPRESENTED BY TEODORICO
NISPEROS, Petitioners, v. MARISSA NISPEROS-
DUCUSIN, Respondent.

G.R. No. 196973, July 31, 2013 - PEOPLE OF THE

PHILIPPINES, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. RUPER POSING Y
ALAYON, Accused-Appellant.

OCA I.P.I. NO. 11-3589-RTJ, July 29, 2013 - KONRAD

A. RUBIN AND CONRADO C. RUBIN, Complainants, v.
JUDGE EVELYN CORPUS-CABOCHAN, PRESIDING
JUDGE, REGIONAL TRIAL COURT, BRANCH 98, QUEZON
CITY, Respondent.

G.R. No. 191219, July 31, 2013 - SPO1 RAMON

LIHAYLIHAY1 AND C/INSP. VIRGILIO V. VINLUAN,
Petitioners, v. PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES,
Respondent.

G.R. No. 161211, July 17, 2013 - SPOUSES CELSO

DICO, SR. AND ANGELES DICO, Petitioners, v. VIZCAYA
MANAGEMENT CORPORATION, Respondent.

G.R. No. 173226, July 29, 2013 - LAND BANK OF THE

PHILIPPINES, Petitioner, v. MANUEL O. GALLEGO, JR.,
JOSEPH L. GALLEGO AND CHRISTOPHER L. GALLEGO,
Respondents.

G.R. No. 188767, July 24, 2013 - SPOUSES ARGOVAN

AND FLORIDA GADITANO, Petitioners, v. SAN MIGUEL
CORPORATION, Respondent.

G.R. No. 189121, July 31, 2013 - AMELIA GARCIA-

QUIAZON, JENNETH QUIAZON AND MARIA JENNIFER
QUIAZON, Petitioners, v. MA. LOURDES BELEN, FOR
AND IN BEHALF OF MARIA LOURDES ELISE QUIAZON,
Respondent.

G.R. No. 192685, July 31, 2013 - OSCAR R. AMPIL,

Petitioner, v. THE HON. OFFICE OF THE OMBUDSMAN,
POLICARPIO L. ESPENESIN, REGISTRAR, REGISTER OF
DEEDS, PASIG CITY, FRANCIS SERRANO, YVONNE S.
YUCHENGCO, AND GEMA O. CHENG, Respondents.; G.R.
No. 199115 - OSCAR R. AMPIL, Petitioner, v.
POLICARPIO L. ESPENESIN, Respondent.

G.R. No. 175666, July 29, 2013 - MANILA BANKERS

LIFE INSURANCE CORPORATION, Petitioner, v.
CRESENCIA P. ABAN, Respondent.

G.R. No. 165386, July 29, 2013 - NATIONAL POWER

CORPORATION, Petitioner, v. SPOUSES SALVADOR AND
NENITA CRUZ, SPOUSES EDMUNDO AND MERLA
BARZAGA, SPOUSES CRISANTO AND JULIETA DELA
CRUZ, SPOUSES LORENZO AND ROSALINA PALAGANAS,
SPOUSES RICARDO AND LOLITA SAGUID, SPOUSES
CARMELITA A-ND RESTITUTO ALCID, HIPOLITA
NASALGA, CRISELDA AND 'REDENTOR REYES,
ILUMINADA ALIPIO, REYNALDO ALIPIO, CORAZON
PELAYO, SPOUSES ROLANDO AND FELICIDAD
BOANGUTS, SPOUSES JOSELLTO AND CAROLINE
MENDOZA, SPOUSES ERLINDA AND CELSO DE GUZMAN,
SPOUSES MIGUEL AND VIRGINIA CASAS, SPOUSES
ERLINDA AND CELSO DICCION, MA. RENITA MARIANO,
VICTORIA ESPIRITU, SPOUSES VICTOR AND ROSARION
SOTELO, RENATO GUIEB, DANIEL STA. MARIA,
SPOUSES MELANIO AND SOTERIA TORRES, SPOUSES
CIRIACO AND PERLITA BENDIJO, SPOUSES L.ILIA AND
DOMINGO TORRES, PACITA TORRES AND
GREGORIA.CASTILLO, SPOUSES HILARIO AND AMANDA
DONIZA, SPOUSES JEREMIAS AND ISABEL GARCIA,
SPOUSES EDUARDO AND MA. MARIN CALDERON,
SPOUSES ERNESTO AND PELAGIA LUCAS, CORAZON
ACOSTA, TERESITA LACSON AND JULIANA DE GUZMAN,
PERLA REYES, SPOUSES ESMELITON AND REMEDIOS
ESPIRITU, SPOUSES ROGELIO AND AURORA ABALON,
DITAS GARCIA, TERESITA CAPATI, SPOUSES EFREN
AND MERCEDES MARTIN, SPOUSES HIPOLITO AND
ANTONIA STA. MARIA, DIONISIO AND ATANACIA
DOMONDON, JAOQUIN AND MA. THERESA DELA ROSA,
SPOUSES ROMULO AND NORMA DUCUSIN, GENOVEVA
CRUZ AND A. BAUTISTA, PURITA SUNICO, SPOUSES
MINERVA AND ROQUE NUALLA, AND SPOUSES GABINO,
JR. AND CRISPINA ALIPIO, Respondents.

G.R. No. 198110, July 31, 2013 - PEOPLE OF THE

PHILIPPINES, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. WILSON ROMAN,
Accused-Appellant.

G.R. No. 147257, July 31, 2013 - SPOUSES JESUS

DYCOCO and JOELA E. DYCOCO, Petitioners, v. THE
HONORABLE COURT OF APPEALS, NELLY SIAPNO-
SANCHEZ and INOCENCIO BERMA, Respondents.

A.C. No. 9906, July 29, 2013 - ATTY. LESTER R.

NUIQUE, Complainant, v. ATTY. EDUARDO SEDILLO,
Respondent.

G.R. No. 191025, July 31, 2013 - RHODORA PRIETO,

Petitioner, v. ALPADI DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION,
 Respondent.

G.R. No. 184622, July 03, 2013 - PHILIPPINE

OVERSEAS TELECOMMUNICATIONS CORPORATION
(POTC) AND PHILIPPINE COMMUNICATIONS
SATELLITE CORPORATION (PHILCOMSAT), Petitioners,
v. VICTOR AFRICA, ERLINDA I. BILDNER, SYLVIA K.
ILUSORIO, HONORIO POBLADOR III, VICTORIA C.
DELOS REYES, JOHN BENEDICT SIOSON, AND
JOHN/JANE DOES. Respondents.; G.R. Nos. 184712-14
- PHILIPPINE OVERSEAS TELECOMMUNICATIONS
CORPORATION (POTC) AND PHILIPPINE
COMMUNICATIONS SATELLITE CORPORATION
(PHILCOMSAT), Petitioners, v. HON. JENNY LIN
ALDECOA-DELORINO, PAIRING JUDGE OF THE
REGIONAL TRIAL COURT OF MAKATI CITY-BRANCH
138, VICTOR AFRICA, PURPORTEDLY REPRESENTING
PHILCOMSAT, AND JOHN/JANE DOES, Respondents.;
G.R. No. 186066 - PHILCOMSAT HOLDINGS
CORPORATION, REPRESENTED BY CONCEPCION
POBLADOR, Petitioner, v. PHILIPPINE
COMMUNICATIONS SATELLITE CORPORATION
(PHILCOMSAT), REPRESENTED BY VICTOR AFRICA,
Respondents.; G.R. No. 186590 - PHILCOMSAT
HOLDINGS CORPORATION, REPRESENTED BY ERLINDA
I. BILDNER, Petitioner, v. PHILCOMSAT HOLDINGS
CORPORATION, REPRESENTED BY ENRIQUE L. LOCSIN,
Respondent.

G.R. No. 182280, July 29, 2013 - TERESA C. AGUILAR,

CESAR D. RAAGAS, VILLAMOR VILLEGAS, AND THE
REGISTER OF DEEDS FOR THE CITY OF MAKATI,
Petitioners. v. MICHAEL J. OPALLICK, Respondent.

G.R. No. 189293, July 10, 2013 - PEOPLE OF THE

PHILIPPINES, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. VICENTE
CANDELLADA, Accused-Appellant.

Copyright 1998 - 20171998 - 2017 ChanRobles Publishing Company | Disclaimer | E-mail Restrictions ChanRobles Virtual Law Library | chanrobles.com RED