Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
Introduction
The relatively slow pace of adopting and embedding new technologies in education has
been noted and studied for 20 years (Bruce, 1993). More recently, a deeper understanding of
the complex nature of school systems has shifted the focus of such studies from a simple
causal approach at the level of the individual or institution to a more subtle and multi-faceted
study of individuals and schools as components within ecological systems (Crook, 2010).The
purpose of this report was to cooperate with professionals of multiple experiences within the UK
experience.
Interview Questions
1. What is the name and location of one of the schools you were teaching at?
Rationale: Due to England being such a large country, it is important to know the exact
area and school. This allows farther research to take place about the school and
population as well.
2. What were the demographics of that school? Race, Ages, FARMS, SPED?
Rationale: This question helps me to understand the school and student population. I
3. What was the technology availability at that school? Was it equal amongst all schools in
that district?
Conyers Interview Report 3
Rationale: This was to help gather a better understanding the technology availability for
the interviewee. This also helped me determine what students would be able to have
4. What did professional development look like at that school? Did it revolve around
technology?
school.
5. What technology limitations do you think there are in the UK, if any?
wanted to see where they felt the UK ranked with the implementation of technology.
This would also help me to connect with the above question on professional
development.
Strategy Used
Although several attempts were made through international blogs and via email to
teachers who seemed interested in connecting, there was little to no follow through with my
interview questions. Through one of my coworkers at school, I connected with her former
coworker, who is now part of Teach for America. Her connection then led me to my other
connection, although very grateful, it was a little late in the process. Communication was mainly
Persons Interviewed
international. She joined Teach for America, and was sent to England to work
with youth that has been put out of public schooling. While she has finished up
Washington D.C.
A 5th grade teacher of mathematics, English, Science, Social Studies, Art, and IT;
Anglea is also very interested in global education, and will be continuing her
After my internet chat with Wendy Oftedahl, the extreme disconnect with the levels of
education seemed to be apparent. Wendy is responsible for teaching students that have been
put out of the public education system in London, England. While teachers met with students
in a public library setting and were able to use the technology there, students had no access to
technology when leaving this setting. This setting was also not appropriate for teachers to
model technology for students, or collaborative learning to take place. As far as professional
development, the program was focused on students being able to pass the appropriate tests to
earn their graduation requirements, and to therefor keep the program funded. There was no
While this interview was rather shocking to me, the program truly was not that far off
from the GED programs that the US offers to students that drop out of the regular public
education setting. Unfortunately, this will not be setting the students up for much career
success, as they will not be confident with the use of technology, or comfortable working
My second interview, with Angela Laderach was also very informative from a teachers
prospective, that has been in several different teaching environments. Angela teaches at a
primary school with a population of mainly low-income students. While there was some
technology in the school, there was not nearly enough for a 1:1 setting, or even enough for a
structured classroom with properly run collaboration stations to be effective. There was a
smartboard and teacher computer, so at least these students were able to see technology
modeled appropriately with the teacher, and could be interactive within that environment.
Unfortunately, low income schools struggle to afford the proper technology, and while there is
funding, it comes from SAT scores, which are usually not high enough from low income schools.
A positive piece that Angela shared was regarding technology for special needs students. It
seems that no matter which income level school these students attended, they were always
afforded the adaptive technology they needed in order to be successful. While Angela shared
that professional development did happen, like Wendy, she stated that it was not in reference to
would have really liked to have interviewed a teacher from a higher income school in order to
compare my findings. While it seems that England has the appropriate technology, they need to
find a better way to level the playing field and evenly distribute the technology to all schools in
need. Teachers also need to have the proper professional development in order to be
successful in the classroom, and gain the greatest results with student knowledge.
Conyers Interview Report 6
Conclusion
Based on prior research and findings, I knew that England was well developed in terms
of technology in schools. The technology is there, and being implemented effectively, it is just
not happening in all schools. There needs to be a more efficient system for making certain that
all schools, regardless of income level, are provided with equal technology and an equally high
level of education. There also needs to be a system created to properly train teachers through
effective professional development, although this is an area in which all countries seem to
struggle. Hopefully we will continue to have educators such as Wendy and Angela, that dedicate
their life to sharing knowledge around the globe, and we also have teachers who dedicate
themselves to incorporating global education within their home classrooms. The more we open
Communication
Angela Laderach
to me
Hi Bonnie,
Wendy told me you'd be in touch. I'm happy to help in any way that I can
Chat soon,
Angela
Bonnie
Conyers <bonnieconyers@gmail.com>
to Angela
Ok great. So if you don't mind, I would like to ask you a few questions about the UK experience. Thanks!!!
1. What is the name and location of one of the schools you were teaching at?
2. What were the demographics of that school? Race, Ages, FARMS, SPED? (estimate is great)
3. What was the technology availability at that school? Was it equal amongst all schools in that district?
4. What did professional development look like at that school, did it revolve around technology?
5. What technology limitations do you think there are in the UK, if any?
Conyers Interview Report 7
Bonnie
Conyers <bonnieconyers@gmail.com>
to Angela
Just checking to see if you had time to answer my questions. It's just for a grad project...no pressure!
Angela Laderach
to me
Hi,
Sorry I got a little carried away with my two young nephews.
Just checking to see if you had time to answer my questions. It's just for a grad project...no pressure!
1. What is the name and location of one of the schools you were teaching at?
Rushy Meadow Primary School, Carshalton, Sutton. (South of London)
2. What were the demographics of that school? Race, Ages, FARMS, SPED? (estimate is great)
The school was made up of mainly low income Caucasian families with some low & middle income families of
African and Caribbean descent. Approximately 300 pupils ranging from 4-11 years of age. There was a special
unit for children with hearing impairment and we had about 10 deaf students in our school. As much as
possible they were integrated in mainstream classes with their own sign language translator. The SEN register
also had numerous children on the autism spectrum. About 30% of the students were either in care or had
social workers working closely with their families to ensure that they were cared for. 75-80% of students were
entitled to free school meals. Also about 60 % of students had severe behaviour needs which resulted in all
staff being trained in 'positive handling techniques' (basically staff were trained on how to restrain a child that
was acting out in order to prevent self-harm or harm to others)
3. What was the technology availability at that school? Was it equal amongst all schools in that district?
The technology was pretty limited when I was there. Each class had a smart board and a pc for teacher use.
There was also 1-2 other computers outside each class for students to use for extension activities. Children
with hearing impairments that had hearing aids were equipped with sound banks that amplified the teacher's
voice
4. What did professional development look like at that school, did it revolve around technology?
The school had regular pd sessions but because of the make up of the students they revolved more around
behaviour management techniques and integration of Sen students rather than on technology. In the 4 years
that I taught at that school I didn't receive any of focused on the use of new technology.
5. What technology limitations do you think there are in the UK, if any?
Conyers Interview Report 8
Schools in the U.K. Vary greatly as far as resources go. Schools in low socio-economic areas often struggle to
acquire the funding needed for new resources. Funding for schools is determined by how well they perform in
SATs and therefore often schools that could really benefit from additional resources are often the last to get.
Things may have changed in the last 5 years though because they have just recently implemented a new
curriculum with new means of measuring attainment.
Angela
References
Bruce, B.C. (1993). Innovation and social change. B.C. Bruce, J.K. Peyton, E. Batson (Eds.),
Cambridge (1993)
Crook et al., 2010. Crook, C., Harrison, C, Farrington-Flint, L., Toms, C. & Underwood, J.
(5.07.2013).