0 valutazioniIl 0% ha trovato utile questo documento (0 voti)
89 visualizzazioni1 pagina
This rubric evaluates case study papers on historical fires based on four main criteria: data presentation, discussion/analysis, format, and relevance to topic. Papers are scored on a scale from 1-5 in each category, with the highest scores going to papers that accurately present relevant facts to support their discussion, draw appropriate conclusions, follow APA style guidelines, demonstrate mastery of terminology, and fully develop their topic through relevant research. Papers scoring highest will provide a clear introduction, analyze data to support their main points without excessive quotes, and meet the overall objectives of the assignment.
This rubric evaluates case study papers on historical fires based on four main criteria: data presentation, discussion/analysis, format, and relevance to topic. Papers are scored on a scale from 1-5 in each category, with the highest scores going to papers that accurately present relevant facts to support their discussion, draw appropriate conclusions, follow APA style guidelines, demonstrate mastery of terminology, and fully develop their topic through relevant research. Papers scoring highest will provide a clear introduction, analyze data to support their main points without excessive quotes, and meet the overall objectives of the assignment.
This rubric evaluates case study papers on historical fires based on four main criteria: data presentation, discussion/analysis, format, and relevance to topic. Papers are scored on a scale from 1-5 in each category, with the highest scores going to papers that accurately present relevant facts to support their discussion, draw appropriate conclusions, follow APA style guidelines, demonstrate mastery of terminology, and fully develop their topic through relevant research. Papers scoring highest will provide a clear introduction, analyze data to support their main points without excessive quotes, and meet the overall objectives of the assignment.
Weight Category 5 4 2 1 Criteria Introduction paragraph Introduction accurately reflects paper content (summary) Relevant facts and information Data Presentation support paper. No more than 10% direct quotes. Students develop and discuss 60% Discussion / Analysis data, facts, and findings to support main points Use of subject/course Use of Terminology terminology correctly Overall conclusions drawn from Conclusions discussion and emphasizes main points APA style followed Title page, Format References, Margins, Font, Double-spaced 10% Correct spelling, grammar, and Spelling/Grammar/Punctuation sentence structure; generally error free 2-3 sources researched to Research Quality support the topic and fully develop points Meets course/paper objectives, 30% Relevance to Topic shows mastery of subject