1

Right to Information Application 13/06/2017

Nodal agency:- (Department of Personnel and Training) DOPT

New Delhi.

Public Authority:- Central Information Commission(henceforth called CIC, in brief)

Re: application for access to information (Right to Information Act , 2005)

The applicant seeks the following information to prevent weakening of

accountability in Public Life:-

Applicant/Appellant Respondent
Case No. Shri Gopal Soni The New India
CIC/MP/A/2016/000371 Assurance Co. Ltd
(NIACL)
Date of Hearing Date of Decision
6 January 2017 30 January 2017
1. Information of the During video conference Respondent NIACLs
the applicant observed that representative could
language used by
not reply in the
respondents language asked by
representative Central Information
Commissioner

2. Information of the audio

video recording of the
said video conference
hearing, if any.

3. Information of the file

noting in-between the date of
hearing and the date of
decision
RTI fee is paid by the applicant. Shri Gopal Soni (RTI applicant)
Regards,
revribhav@gmail.com C231,Panchsheel Nagar,Ajmer-305004
Cell No. 91-9414982395 P. T. O.
 2

1. 2006-07 Applicants article on RTI is published by a public sector undertaking,

namely NIACLs Jaipur magazine
2. Even before the process of domestic enquiry the applicants
12/06/ misconduct is spread as propaganda in the C I C by NIACL ignoring the
2008 CVC directions of April 2008 as per S. No.4 of this RTI

Nature of so called misconduct of the applicant:-

The act of Mr. ShriGopal Soni leaving headquarters repeatedly
without permission of comeptent authority amounts to his gross
(grave) violation of the Company rules which is not expected from a
public servant (company personnel) .
It is clear from the aforesaid that Mr. Soni did not observe honesty
& integrity to his duties and he acted against the image of a public
servant & under prejudice to the interests of the Company and thus
violated rules 3(i)(ii)(iii)(iv) & committed misonduct under Rules
4(1),(5),(6),(7),(8),(9),(16),(17),(20) & Rule 18(1) & Rule 19 of
General Insurance Conduct Discipline & Appeal Rules,1975.
Date:13.02.2008 Place: Jaipur (B. P. Yadav) Manager

3. Ethics applicable to NIACL officials stipulate the following:-

12.10. The Book of Dos and Donts List of Donts:-DO NOT:-
1999 Be arbitrary or capricious in your decisions, your decisions
should be justifiable and based on sound reasons.

4. CVC the appropriate nodal agency issues written directions

29.04. to NIACL to ensure that the applicant is not harassed in any
2008 manner.(OM Reference No. Conf/1463/08 /9639)

5. questions To ethical Credibility of the CVO of NIACL

 3

19.12.
2011

No existence of designation of hindi translators in the

NIACL,since 2006, reveals the above RTI
Abuse of chief vigilance officer,inter alia, for giving
19/01
fake information ; Mrs. Gopa Ray ,GM-CVO {Chief
/2009 Vigilance Officer}, NIACL, writes to CVC .
CVO NIACL stresses the specialized status of applicant
a Hindi Translator 3 times.

6.
27/06/ A R Sekar NIACLs senior most General Managers order to
applicant : applicants RTI transferred by The NHRC {National
2009
Human Rights Commission} :
It (seeking access to information under RTI) is a crude
attempt to confuse the different authorities and an
attempt to escape from the due process of law
7.
Clip from
staus
quo
bribe
takers
enjoy
4