Difference between culpa contractual and culpa aquilina

As to burden of proof
As to employers defense for employees negligence
1. Cangco v manila railroad, 14 October 1918
2. Calalas v ca 31 may 2000
Can one be liable for quasi delict if there is pre-existing contract?
3. Air France vs carascoso 28 September 1966
Concept of Negligence (what is the degree of diligence)
4. PNR v. CA 15 October 2007
5. PNR v. Brunty 2 Nov. 2006
What is gross negligence?
6. Ilao oreta v. ronquillo 11 Oct, 2007
Concept of good father of the family
7. Sicam v. Jorge 8 august 2007
Can children be guilty of negligence?
8. Taylor v. manila electric railroad 22 march 1910
9. Jarco Marketing vs ca 21 Dec. 1999
Pharmacist diligence
10. Us v.pineda 22 Jan 1918
11. Mercury drug v. de Leon 17 Oct 2008

Medical professional diligence / standard of professional must be testified by expert witness

12. Cruz v. ca 18 Nov. 1997
13. Cayao lasam v spouses ramonete 18 Dec 2008
14. Lucas v dr tuano 17 April 2009
Presumption of negligence
Art. 2185
15. Tison v. spouses pomasin 24 august 2011
16. Sanitary steam v ca 10 dec. 1998
Res ipsa loquitur
Concept / element
17. Professional services v. Agana 31 jan 2007
18. Tan v jam transit 25 nov 2009
19. College assurance v belfranlt 22 nov 2007
20.Dm consunji v ca 20 april 2001
21. Ramos v ca 29 dec 1999
Defenses for negligence
a. Plaintiff negligence is the proximate cause
22. Pldt vs ca 29 dec 1989
b. Contributory negligence of the plaintiff
23. MH rakes v atlantic 23 jan 1907
c. fortuitous event
see article 1174
24. Juntilla v Fontanar may 1985
25. Southeastern College v CA 10 jluy 1998
d. Plaintiff assumption of risk
26.Nikko hotel v. Roberto reyes 28 feb 2005
27.Pantaleon v American Express 25 August 2010
PROXIMATE CAUSE
28.Batachan v Medina 22 October 1957
29 phoenix construction vs iac 10 march 1987 ( emphasis on intervening cause )
30. Dy Teban v Jose Ching 4 February 2008
Last clear chance
31.Picart vs Smith 15 march 1918
32.Lapanday v Angala 21June 2007
Person Vicariously Liable
Parent
33. Libi v IAC 18 September 1992
34. Tamargo v CA 3 june 1992
35.Teacher and Schools
36.Palisoc vs. Brillantes 4 Oct. 1971
37.Amadora Vds. CA 15 April 1988
38.Salvosa v IAC 5 October 1988
39.St. Joseph College v Miranda 29 June 2010

Employer employee relationship

40.Profesional Services v. Agana 31 Jan 2007
41. NPC v CA 4 August 1998
Defense of employer
42. Mercury Drug vs. Huang 22 June 2007 ( selection and supervision )
43. Lampesa v De vera 4 February 2008
The State
44. Meritt v Government 21 March 1916
45. Fontanilla vs Maliaman 1 December 1989
Possessor of Animal
46. Vestil v IAC 6 November 1989
Motor Vehicle Mishap
47. Caedo v. Yu khe Thai 18 December 1968
City and Municipality
48. Quezon City vs. Dacara 15 June 2005
49. Guilatco v Dagupan 21 March 1989
Damages
50 Custodio v ca 9 February 1996 (there must be injury before damages can be awarded)
Actual damages
51 Omc carriers inc v ca 21 jan 1999
52 Pnoc vs ca 8 oct. 1998
53 Candano v sugata on 13 march 2007
54 Villa rey transit v ca 18 feb 1970
55 In contract and quasi contract
56 Sps zalamea v ca 18 nov 1993
57 Bpi fami;y bank v franco 23 nov 2007
Earning capacity /loss of earning capacity
58 Gatchalian v delim 21 oct 1991
59 Simex international v ca 19 march 1990
60 Phil. Hawk v lee 16 feb. 2010
61 Pleyto v lomboy 16 june 2004
In crime
62 Crisostomo v people 1 sept . 2010
63 People vs banago 29 june 1999.

Attorneys fees
64 Quirante v iac 31 jan1989
65 Manila electric company v ramoy 4 march 2008
66 Briones v macabagdal 3 august 2010
67 Bank of America vs. phil racing club 30 july 2009
68 Andrada v pilhino sales 23 feb. 2011
Interst
69 Eastern shipping v ca 12 july 1994
70 Pan pacific v equitable 18 march 2010
71 Frias vs san diego sison 3 april 2007
Moral damages
72 Keiruf v ca 13 march 1997
73 Bf metal v lomotan 16 april 2008
In Seduction rape
74 People v lizano 27 april 2007
Libel / slander
75 Occena v icamina 22 jan 1990
Juridical person
76 Abs cbn vs ca 21 jan 1999