Sei sulla pagina 1di 6

1/8/2017 Arandomizedcontrolstudycomparingthepharyngolaryngealmorbidityoflaryngealmaskairwayversusendotrachealtube

AnesthEssaysRes.2016MayAug10(2):189194. PMCID:PMC4864682
doi:10.4103/02591162.174466

Arandomizedcontrolstudycomparingthepharyngolaryngealmorbidityof
laryngealmaskairwayversusendotrachealtube
A.Venugopal,RonMathewJacob,andRachelCherianKoshy
DepartmentofAnaesthesiology,RegionalCancerCentre,Thiruvananthapuram,Kerala,India
Correspondingauthor:Dr.A.Venugopal,DepartmentofAnaesthesiology,RegionalCancerCentre,Thiruvananthapuram695011,Kerala,India.E
mail:venuanila@yahoo.com

Copyright:Anesthesia:EssaysandResearches

ThisisanopenaccessarticledistributedunderthetermsoftheCreativeCommonsAttributionNonCommercialShareAlike3.0License,whichallows
otherstoremix,tweak,andbuildupontheworknoncommercially,aslongastheauthoriscreditedandthenewcreationsarelicensedundertheidentical
terms.

Abstract Goto:

Introduction:
Endotrachealtube(ETT)hasbeenassociatedwithvariouspharyngolaryngealmorbidities(PLMs)following
generalanesthesia(GA).Laryngealmaskairway(LMA),currentlythemostcommonlyusedsupraglotticairway
device,hasseveraladvantageousovertheETTbuthasbeenassociatedwithvaryingresultsofPLM.Theaimof
ourstudywastocomparethePLMbetweenthemandtoknowwhetherLMAisabetteralternative.

MaterialsandMethods:
OnehundredandseventyAmericanSocietyofAnesthesiologistsGrades1and2womenscheduledforelective
mastectomywereincludedinthestudy,85eachineithergroup,EGroup(intubatedwithETT)andLGroup(using
LMA)onarandombasis.AllpatientsreceivedGAwithcontrolledventilationusingamusclerelaxant.PLMssuch
ashoarseness,painonphonation,sorethroat,anddifficultyinswallowingweredocumentedbyaninterviewdone
postoperatively.Peroperativeparameterssuchasintubationattempts,traumaduringairwaydeviceinsertion,and
intraoperativeincidentswerealsoanalyzed.Asamplesizeof85patientsineachgroupwascalculatedinorderto
achieveastudypowerof0.8andalphalevelwastakenas0.05.DatawereanalyzedusingSPSSversion16using
Chisquaretest,MannWhitneyUtestandFisher'sexacttestwereusedasnonparametrictests.AtwotailedP<
0.05wasconsideredsignificant.

Results:
PatientsinEGrouphadstatisticallysignificantincreasedincidenceofasorethroatandvoicecomplaintswhereasL
Groupshowedastatisticallysignificantincreaseofswallowingproblems.Therewasalsoasignificantcorrelation
betweentraumaticinsertionandsorethroat,painonswallowingintheLGroup,whichcouldbeduetodirect
trauma.

Conclusions:
ETTwasassociatedwithanincreasedincidenceofvoiceproblemsandsorethroatwhereasLMAhadanincreased
incidenceofdysphagiaandodynophagia.UseofLMAchangesthepharyngolaryngealprofiletoamoreacceptable
one.

Keywords:Anesthesiageneral,endotracheal,intubation,laryngealmaskairway,morbidity,postoperativeperiod

INTRODUCTION Goto:

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4864682/ 1/6
1/8/2017 Arandomizedcontrolstudycomparingthepharyngolaryngealmorbidityoflaryngealmaskairwayversusendotrachealtube

Injuriestotheairwayarewellrecognizedcomplicationsofgeneralanesthesia(GA).Claimstoairwayinjuriesare
frequentinAmericanSocietyofAnaesthesiologists(ASA)closedclaimsdatabaseinwhichinjuriestothelarynx
representabout33%,mostofthemrelatingtolonglastingpainorvoicecomplaintsduetonerveapraxiaand
cartilagetrauma.[1]Sorethroathadbeenratedastheeighthmostadverseeffectinthepostoperativeperiod
followingGAwhichcancontributetopostoperativemorbidityandpatientdissatisfaction.[2]

Severalriskfactorsforpostoperativesorethroatduetoanendotrachealtube(ETT)havebeenidentifiedwhich
includefemalegender,age,surgicalsite,useofnitrousoxide,anddurationofsurgery.[3]Laryngealmaskairway
(LMA),themostpopularsupraglotticairwaydevice,issaidtohavealowerincidenceofpostoperativesorethroat
andvoiceproblemsthoughwidevariationsintheirincidencearereported.[4]Inpediatricagegroup,theincidence
ofasorethroatbetweenendotrachealintubationandLMAarenotsignificant.[5]Inthisstudy,wecomparedthe
wholespectrumofpharyngolaryngealmorbidity(PLM)suchashoarseness,painonphonation,dysphagia,
odynophagia,andsorethroatbetweentheLMAandETTafterprovidingadequateanestheticdepthatthetimeof
intubation,avoidingnitrousoxide,anddurationofsurgeryrestrictingto2hwhicharesignificantpredictorsof
postoperativesorethroat.[3]Inaddition,wecomparedtheincidenceofvariousperioperativeeventsandtheir
significanceonPLM.

MATERIALSANDMETHODS Goto:

AfterobtainingapprovalfromtheInstitutionalReviewBoardandEthicsCommitteearandomizedcohorttrial
involving170patientsundergoingelectivemastectomywereallocatedtoeitherGroupE(intubatedwithETT)or
GroupL(LMAclassicastheairwaydevice)usingacomputergeneratedrandomtable.

Afterawritteninformedconsent,170womenofASAstatus1and2intheagegroup1860yearsscheduledfor
electivemastectomylasting12hwereincludedinourstudy.Exclusioncriteriaweredifficultairwaywith
Mallampatti(MP)Class3and4,historyofnausea,vomiting,orasorethroatwithin24hofsurgery,obesity,and
gastroesophagealreflux.Thosewithpreoperativevoiceandswallowingproblemsandrequiringmorethanthree
attemptsforairwaydeviceplacementwerealsoexcluded.

Allpatientswerepremedicatedorallywithalprazolam0.5mgonthenightbeforeandabout2hbeforeinduction.
Inthepremedicationroombaselineparameterssuchasheartrate,bloodpressure,electrocardiogram,andoxygen
saturationwererecorded,intravenous(I/V)fluidstartedandmidazolam1mg,fentanyl2g/kgweregivenbefore
induction.Afterpreoxygenation,I/Vlidocaine1.5mg/kgwasgivenandanesthesiainducedwithpropofol2.0
mg/kgandmusclerelaxationobtainedwith0.1mg/kgvecuronium.Patientswereventilatedwith35%oxygeninair
andisofluranedialconcentrationadjustedtoachieveaminimumalveolarconcentrationof1aspertheavailablegas
monitoringtoensureadequatedepththroughouttheprocedure.Tracheaintubatedwithappropriatesizedcuffedoral
ETTandconfirmedwithendtidalcarbondioxideandauscultationforbilateralairentry.Cuffwasinflatedjustto
preventairleakandtubewassecured.LMAinsertioninvolvedpreparationofthedevice(cuffdeflatedandwell
lubricatedwithKYjelly)andblinddigitalinsertionperformedandpositionconfirmedasabove.Cuffwasinflated
aspertheinstructionsofthemanufacturerandthedevicesecured.Amaximumofthreeattemptstopositionthe
devicewereallowed,beforeproceedingtoalternatemethodofairwaymanagementandsuchcaseswererecorded
andexcludedfromthestudy.Anesthesiawasmaintainedwithairoxygenmixturewithinspiredoxygenof35%.A
perioperativedataformcontainingintubationdataandperioperativeincidentswerealsofilledwhichdocumentsthe
numberofattemptsoranytraumatooropharynxduringintubation/LMAinsertion.Morethanoneattemptwas
takenasaperioperativeincident.Anyintraoperativeuntowardincidentsuchasabnormalriseinairwaypressure,
bucking,comingoutofanesthesiaduringtheprocedure,andextubationtimeeventswerealsonoted.

Thetraumatic/atraumaticcriteriawasbasedonwhethertherewasanybloodontheETT/LMAatthetimeof
extubationand/oranyvisibledamagetotheoropharynxafterextubationwhichincludestraumatothelips,teeth,or
gumincaseofendotrachealintubation.I/Vdiclofenacsodium/tramadolweregivenforpostoperativepainrelief.At
theendofthesurgeryneuromuscularblockadewasreversed,patientawakened,theairwaydeviceremoved,and
thepatientshiftedtotherecoveryroom.

Allpatientsunderwentastructuredinterviewat12,24,and36hpostoperativelywhichwasconductedbyan
anesthesiaresidentwhodidnotknowthenatureofairwaymanagementdeviceused.Patientswereaskedabout
sorethroat(constantpainindependentofswallowing),hoarseness,andorpainduringphonation(asvoice
complaints)andaboutdysphagia/odynophagia(difficulty/painonswallowing).Severityofpainduetosorethroat
andodynophagiawererecordedinthevisualanalogpainscale(VAS).
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4864682/ 2/6
1/8/2017 Arandomizedcontrolstudycomparingthepharyngolaryngealmorbidityoflaryngealmaskairwayversusendotrachealtube

MannWhitneyUteststatisticwasusedwhenthevariableswereordinal/interval,Fisher'sexacttestwasusedfor
smallsamplesizesandgoodnessoffittothedatawastestedusingChisquare(2)test.AtwotailedP<0.05was
consideredsignificant.ThestatisticalanalysiswasdoneusingSPSSversion16(SPSS,Inc.,Chicago,IL).

RESULTS Goto:

Outofthe170patientsoriginallyenrolledinthestudy,12patientscouldnotbefollowedup(4intheLGroupand
8intheETTGroup)astheyweredischargedbeforetheinterviewcouldbecompleted.Hence,thetotalstudy
populationwasonly158.ScoreontheVASscalewascategorizedtomild(12)moderate(35)andsevere(>6).
Boththegroupswerecomparableintermsofage,weight,durationofanesthesia,andanestheticmanagement.

Agedistributionbetweenthetwoairwaysmanagementtechniqueswerecloselymatched(P=0.749).Regarding
voicecomplaints,patientsweresortedintothreecategories(novoicecomplaintshoarsenessonlyandpainduring
speech).At12hsignificantlymorepatients(P<0.01)whowereintubatedwiththeETT(21outof77)hada
hoarsevoicethanthoseintheL(14outof81)group(27.3vs.17.3%).About9.0%oftheEGroup(7outof77)
hadpainduringphonationascomparedtononefortheLGroup.After24hcomplainsofhoarsenessintheE
Groupdecreasedto14.3%(11outof77)andpainonphonationdecreasedto2.6%(2outof77)while8.6%ofthe
patients(7outof81)intheLGrouphadhoarseness,nonehadpainonphonation.However,thisdifferencewas
notsignificant(P>0.05).After36h10.4%oftheEGroup(8outof77)hadhoarsenesswhereasonly1.2%(1out
of81)oftheLMAGrouphad(P<0.05).Nonehadpainonphonationat36h[Table1].

Table1
Comparisonofhoarseness/painonspeakingbasedongroup

Painonswallowingisanotherdistressingsequelofairwaymanagement.Agreaternumberofpatientswhowerein
theLGroup(27outof81)hadpainduringswallowingat12h(mildpain18.5%,moderatepain14.8%)compared
tothose(24outof77)intheEGroup(mildpain31.2%,nonehadmoderatepain).However,thisdifferencewas
notfoundtobesignificant(P>0.05).At24hpatientsintheLGroup(22outof81)hadsignificantly(P<0.01)
morepain(mild22.2%moderate4.9%)thanintheE(6outof77)Group(mild7.8%).Thisdifference(P<0.01)
continuedupto36hLGroup(mildpain16%EGroupnopainreported).Though31%ofpatientsintheEGroup
(almostsameasLGroup)hadpainonswallowingat12h,itreducedsignificantlyinthenext24handnopainwas
reportedat36h[Table2].

Table2
Comparisonofpainonswallowingbasedongroup

At12hcomplaintsofasorethroatweresignificantlymoreintheEGroup(47outof77)thanintheL(29outof
81)Group(61.1%vs.35.8%,P<0.01).TheseveritywasalsomoreintheEGroup(moderatepain13%vs.
4.9%).However,at24and36htherewerenosignificantdifferencesbetweenthetwogroupsalthoughalarger
percentageoftheEGrouphadasorethroat(35.15%vs.23.5%and22.1%vs.14.8%,respectively)[Table3].

Table3
Comparisonofasorethroatbasedongroup

PerioperativeeventsisabroadbasedtermintowhichalltheperioperativefactorsthatcouldplayaroleinPLM
havebeenplaced.Themainroleofthisvariablewastofilteroutconfoundingfactors.Comparisonofperioperative
eventsbasedonthegroupdoesnotshowanysignificantdifferencewithP=0.511(16.9%vs.21%and83.1%vs.
79%)buttraumaduringintubation/LMAinsertionshowedasignificantdifference.Only16.9%ofpatientsintheE
Groupshowedbloodoncuffcomparedto38.3%intheLGroup[P=0.003,Table4].Thesignificanceof
perioperativeeventswascheckedonlywiththeincidenceofthecomplaintsat12h.Fisher'sexacttestwasusedas
therewerecellsinthe22contingencytablewhichhadlessnumberofobservationsprecludingtheuseof2test.
Asperthestudy,therewasnosignificantimpactofvariousintraoperativeincidentsontheoutcomevariables
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4864682/ 3/6
1/8/2017 Arandomizedcontrolstudycomparingthepharyngolaryngealmorbidityoflaryngealmaskairwayversusendotrachealtube

exceptinthecomplaintsofasorethroatintheEGroupwheretheP=0.0123[Table5].Therewasalsoa
significantcorrelationbetweentraumaticinsertionandsorethroat(P<0.001),painonswallowing(P<0.003)in
theLGroup,whichcouldbeduetodirecttrauma[Tables6and7].

Table4
Comparisonoftraumaduringintubation/insertionbasedongroup

Table5
Comparisonofperioperativeincidentsontheincidenceofasorethroatin
theendotrachealtubegroupat12h

Table6
Comparisonoftraumaticinsertionontheincidenceofpainonswallowingin
thelaryngealmaskairwaygroupat12h

Table7
Comparisonoftraumaticinsertionontheincidenceofasorethroatinthe
laryngealmaskairwaygroupat12h

DISCUSSION Goto:

Asorethroatassociatedwithintubationcanbeattributedtomultiplefactorssuchastubesize,[6]sex,[3,7]typeof
surgeries,[3]cuffdesign,[8]useoflocalanesthetic,andlubricationforthecuff.[9]Ourincidenceofasorethroat
(61.1%at12h)fortheETTwashigherthanthereportof40%(n=809)incidencebyBiroetal.[10]butlessthan
Raduetal.[11]whereanincidenceof74%,butat6h.Thegreaterandmoresignificantincidenceofasorethroatin
theEGroupinourstudycanbebecauseoftheplacementofETTtomoresensitivetissuesofthelarynxandthe
tracheawhichcausessensitizationtopain,thuscontributingtoapostoperativesorethroat.[12]Christensenetal.[7]
intheirstudyreportedalowerincidenceofasorethroat(14.4%)whereasOgataetal.[13]foundanincidenceofa
sorethroattobe55%and45%,4and24haftersurgery.

Hoarsenessisacommoncomplicationafterendotrachealintubation.Yamanakaetal.[14]observedanincidenceof
49%onthedayofsurgery,29%,11%,and0.8%on1,3,and7postoperativedays,respectively.Themostcommon
causeforpostoperativehoarsenessinpatientsundergoingproceduresthatdonotinvolvetheheadandneckis
swellingofthevocalcords.[15]Vocalcordparalysisandparesishavebeenreportedaftertrachealintubation
despitetheintubationbeingatraumaticandthesiteofthesurgeryremotefromtheheadandneck.[16,17]The
incidenceofvocalcordgranulomathefollowingintubationisreportedtobebetween1in800and1in20,000.[18]
Arytenoiddislocationwhichisararecomplicationfollowingtrachealintubationthatwillresultinprolonged
hoarsenessofvoicehasalsobeenreported.[14]

AsorethroatduetoLMAcanbemultifactorial,anditsincidencecanbeinfluencedbythedepthofanesthesiaat
themomentofinsertion,methodofinsertion,thenumberofattempts,andthepresenceofhumidifiermoisture
exchangerinthecircuit.[19]TheincidenceofasorethroatwiththeuseofLMAvarieswidelyandmaybe
attributabletodifferentmethodologies.[8,20,21]Severalstudieshaveevaluatedinsertiontechniques,lubricantsand
theeffectofcuffpressurelimitationintermsofeaseofinsertionoftheLMA,pharyngealtrauma,andpostoperative
throatsymptoms.[22,23]However,whatwassurprisinginourstudywasahigherincidenceofasorethroatinL
Group(35.8%)astheyunderwentcontrolledventilation,whichmightrequirehighersealingpressuresforthecuff
ascomparedtospontaneouslybreathingpatients,thusresultinginmoremucosalischemicinjury.Someauthors[19]
foundnorelationshipbetweencuffpressureandPLM,whereasothers[24,25]cametotheconclusionthat
minimizingcuffpressuresledtodecreasedsorethroat.

Inametaanalysisofrandomizedcontroltrials[26]comparingLMAwithETT,lessincidenceofvoiceproblems
withLMAwasfoundwhichcanbeofadvantagetoprofessionalvoiceusers.LMAcancausetransientchangesin
vocalcordfunction.[27]Atotalof14nerveinjurieshasbeenreporteduntil2004[28,29]followingtheuseofLMA
namelyrecurrent(7),hypoglossal(5)andlingual(2).Inallthesecasessize,3and4LMA'swereused.Itshouldbe
pointedoutthat,whenperfectlypositioned,theLMAlieswiththetiprestingagainsttheupperesophageal
sphincter,withthesidesfacingthepyriformfossae.

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4864682/ 4/6
1/8/2017 Arandomizedcontrolstudycomparingthepharyngolaryngealmorbidityoflaryngealmaskairwayversusendotrachealtube

Thisstudywasdesignedmainlyforthepresenceorabsenceofaspecificcomplaintratherthantheirseverity.For
havinguniformityinthedurationoftheairwaydeviceplacement,weconfinedourstudypopulationto
mastectomieswhichcanbeconsideredasalimitation.Amuchgeneralizedstudyincludingmalesexandpediatric
populationwithvaryingdurationoftheprocedureisrequiredtofurthersubstantiateourfindings.Anotherlimitation
ofthisstudywasitlackedenoughpowertoestimatethemoreseverevoicecomplaints,asitwillrequireamuch
largersamplesize.Inourstudy,therewasasignificantincidenceoftraumafollowingLMAinsertionevenwith
adequaterelaxationandanestheticdepth.Itcan,therefore,belogicallyinferredthattraumaislikelytobegreater
whenadequaterelaxationandanestheticdeptharenotprovided.Toreducetrauma,perhapsMPclassificationcan
alsobeconsideredwhileselectingthesizeofLMA.

CONCLUSIONS Goto:

BothETTandLMAcancausesignificantPLMfollowingGAwhichcanaffectpatientcomplianceandqualityof
care.ThoughtheincidenceofdysphagiaandodynophagiawerefoundtobemorewithLMA,hoarseness,andsore
throatwhicharemajordeterminantsforprolongedhospitalstayandpatientdiscomfortwerefoundtobemuch
reducedinourstudywhencomparedwithETT.Reassuranceandsymptomaticmanagementforswallowing
problemsareallthatisrequiredtoreducepatient'sanxiety.DefinitelyLMAisabetteralternativewhenused
judiciously,gently,andunderadequateanestheticdepthtoreducetheincidenceofPLMfurther.Cuffpressure
monitoringshouldberecommendedasastandardpracticetoreduceadverseoutcomesofPLM.

Financialsupportandsponsorship
Nil.

Conflictsofinterest

Therearenoconflictsofinterest

Acknowledgment Goto:

WeacknowledgeDr.Aleyamma,AdditionalProfessorinEpidemiologyandStatistics,forthestatisticalhelpfrom
RegionalCancerCentre,Thiruvananthapuram,Kerala,India.

REFERENCES Goto:

1.DominoKB,PosnerKL,CaplanRA,CheneyFW.Airwayinjuryduringanesthesia:Aclosedclaimsanalysis.
Anesthesiology.199991:170311.[PubMed]

2.MacarioA,WeingerM,CarneyS,KimA.Whichclinicalanesthesiaoutcomesareimportanttoavoid.The
perspectiveofpatients?AnesthAnalg.199989:6528.[PubMed]

3.ChenKT,TzengJI,LuCL,LiuKS,ChenYW,HsuCS,etal.Riskfactorsassociatedwithpostoperativesore
throataftertrachealintubation:Anevaluationinthepostanestheticrecoveryroom.ActaAnaesthesiolTaiwan.
200442:38.[PubMed]

4.BriacombeJR,BrainAI.AReviewandPracticalGuide.2nded.WBSaunders:2004.TheLMA.

5.SplinterWM,SmallmanB,RhineEJ,KomocarL.Postoperativesorethroatinchildrenandthelaryngealmask
airway.CanJAnaesth.199441:10813.[PubMed]

6.StoutDM,BishopMJ,DwerstegJF,CullenBF.Correlationofendotrachealtubesizewithsorethroatand
hoarsenessfollowinggeneralanesthesia.Anesthesiology.198767:41921.[PubMed]

7.ChristensenAM,WillemoesLarsenH,LundbyL,JakobsenKB.Postoperativethroatcomplaintsaftertracheal
intubation.BrJAnaesth.199473:7867.[PubMed]

8.McHardyFE,ChungF.Postoperativesorethroat:Cause,preventionandtreatment.Anaesthesia.199954:444
53.[PubMed]

9.LoeserEA,StanleyTH,JordanW,MachinR.Postoperativesorethroat:Influenceoftrachealtubelubrication
versuscuffdesign.CanAnaesthSocJ.198027:1568.[PubMed]

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4864682/ 5/6
1/8/2017 Arandomizedcontrolstudycomparingthepharyngolaryngealmorbidityoflaryngealmaskairwayversusendotrachealtube

10.BiroP,SeifertB,PaschT.Complaintsofsorethroataftertrachealintubation:Aprospectiveevaluation.EurJ
Anaesthesiol.200522:30711.[PubMed]

11.RaduAD,MiledF,MarretE,VigneauA,BonnetF.Pharyngolaryngealdiscomfortafterbreastsurgery:
Comparisonbetweenorotrachealintubationandlaryngealmask.Breast.200817:40711.[PubMed]

12.CorkRC,DepaRM,StandenJR.Prospectivecomparisonofuseofthelaryngealmaskandendotrachealtube
forambulatorysurgery.AnesthAnalg.199479:71927.[PubMed]

13.OgataJ,MinamiK,HorishitaT,ShiraishiM,OkamotoT,TeradaT,etal.Garglingwithsodiumazulene
sulfonatereducesthepostoperativesorethroatafterintubationofthetrachea.AnesthAnalg.2005101:2903.
[PubMed]

14.YamanakaH,HayashiY,WatanabeY,UematuH,MashimoT.Prolongedhoarsenessandarytenoidcartilage
dislocationaftertrachealintubation.BrJAnaesth.2009103:4525.[PubMed]

15.LagasseRS.Isroutineendotrachealintubationsassafeaswethinkorwish?Anesthesiology.200399:2478.
[PubMed]

16.WasonR,GuptaP,GogiaAR.Bilateraladductorvocalcordparesisfollowingendotrachealintubationfor
generalanaesthesia.AnaesthIntensiveCare.200432:4178.[PubMed]

17.LuYH,HsiehMW,TongYH.UnilateralvocalcordparalysisfollowingendotrachealintubationAcase
report.ActaAnaesthesiolSin.199937:2214.[PubMed]

18.KanedaN,GotoR,IshijimaS,KawakamiS,ParkK,ShimaY.Laryngealgranulomacausedbyshortterm
endotrachealintubation.Anesthesiology.199990:14823.[PubMed]

19.FigueredoE,VivarDiagoM,MuozBlancoF.Laryngopharyngealcomplaintsafteruseofthelaryngealmask
airway.CanJAnaesth.199946:2205.[PubMed]

20.BrimacombeJ,KellerC,FullekrugB,AgrF,RosenblattW,DierdorfSF,etal.Amulticenterstudycomparing
theProSealandclassiclaryngealmaskairwayinanesthetized,nonparalyzedpatients.Anesthesiology.
200296:28995.[PubMed]

21.ReddySV,WinN.BrainlaryngealmaskStudyin50spontaneouslybreathingpatients.SingaporeMedJ.
199031:33840.[PubMed]

22.WakelingHG,ButlerPJ,BaxterPJ.Thelaryngealmaskairway:Acomparisonbetweentwoinsertion
techniques.AnesthAnalg.199785:68790.[PubMed]

23.RiegerA,BrunneB,StriebelHW.Intracuffpressuresdonotpredictlaryngopharyngealdiscomfortafteruseof
thelaryngealmaskairway.Anesthesiology.199787:637.[PubMed]

24.BurgardG,MllhoffT,PrienT.Theeffectoflaryngealmaskcuffpressureonpostoperativesorethroat
incidence.JClinAnesth.19968:198201.[PubMed]

25.SeetE,YousafF,GuptaS,SubramanyamR,WongDT,ChungF.Useofmanometryforlaryngealmask
airwayreducespostoperativepharyngolaryngealadverseevents:Aprospective,randomizedtrial.Anesthesiology.
2010112:6527.[PubMed]

26.BrimacombeJ.TheadvantagesoftheLMAoverthetrachealtubeorfacemask:Ametaanalysis.CanJ
Anaesth.199542:101723.[PubMed]

27.ErskineRJ,RabeyPG.Thelaryngealmaskairwayinrecovery.Anaesthesia.199247:354.[PubMed]

28.LowingerD,BenjaminB,GaddL.Recurrentlaryngealnerveinjurycausedbyalaryngealmaskairway.
AnaesthIntensiveCare.199927:2025.[PubMed]

29.SommerM,SchuldtM,RungeU,GielenWijffelsS,MarcusMA.Bilateralhypoglossalnerveinjuryfollowing
theuseofthelaryngealmaskwithouttheuseofnitrousoxide.ActaAnaesthesiolScand.200448:3778.
[PubMed]

ArticlesfromAnesthesia,EssaysandResearchesareprovidedherecourtesyofMedknowPublications

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4864682/ 6/6

Potrebbero piacerti anche