9 Contactmodeling

Contact Analysis:
Modeling Considerations
Arturo Valentin, PhD

and the staff at ADINA R&D, Inc.
March 8, 2016
ADINA R&D, Inc., 2016 1

Overview
Challenges
Basic tools
Understanding diagnostics
Contact definition guidelines
Compliance usage and consequences
Initial penetrations
Frictional contact
Simplifications and conditioning

Achieving Convergence

Achieving Convergence
Cannot expect quadratic convergence unless contact behavior has stabilized!

Why is Contact so Challenging?
Strong, discontinuous nonlinearity
In or out of contact
Slipping or sticking
Interaction with other aspects of model
Element formulations
Mesh size (spatial discretization)
Time steps (temporal discretization)
Potential for modeling errors
Surface definitions and contact search
Contact and solution parameters

Important Tools & Techniques
Enabling detailed diagnostics

Selecting and assigning contact surfaces
Choosing the correct elements/mesh
Judicious use of contact compliance
Suppressing oscillations
Properly handling initial penetrations
(Temporary) problem simplification

Diagnostics
First recommendation: always use
detailed diagnostics. This provides
crucial information!
Nodes coming in and out of contact
Nodes switching from stick to slip
Initial penetrations
Oscillatory behaviour
Causes the .out file to be larger (but

not the .por file).
Also offers Symptoms and probable

causes and remedies when
convergence is not achieved

Interpreting the .out file
Typical converging frictionless model:
Diagnostics: ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
- Nodes coming into contact. 1406 nodes including node 48362 with penetration = 1.000E-04
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Diagnostics: ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
- Nodes losing contact. 843 nodes including node 47524 with contact force = 7.749E-03
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Diagnostics: ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
...
[snip]
...
Diagnostics: ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Diagnostics: ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Diagnostics:
______________________________________________________________________________________________________
** SUCCESSFUL CONVERGENCE ANALYSIS **

Failed Convergence
Diagnostics:
______________________________________________________________________________________________________
** FAILED CONVERGENCE ANALYSIS **
Trend: Iterations are neither converging nor diverging
Symptoms:
- Contactor nodes still changing status between stick and slip
- Big increase in out-of-balance forces at iteration 1
- Ratio of factorized diagonals very high for all iterations in this time step
- Integration points still changing status between elastic and plastic
Most probable causes and remedies:
- Friction nonlinearity
* Increase 'Friction v-Function Parameter (EPST)'
* Apply loads more gradually
Add/increase 'Contact Compliance'
- Plasticity nonlinearity
* Apply loads more gradually, or use smaller time step
* Toggle 'Plasticity Type' algorithm
* Toggle 'Line Search' feature
NOTE: Before making any of the suggested modifications, make sure they are suitable for this model.
Check the program documentation for more details.
NOTE: Before making any of the suggested modifications,

make sure they are suitable for this model.

NOTE: Before making any of the suggested modifications,
make sure they are suitable for this model.
i.e., carefully consider the consequences of the

automated suggestions!
Enabling detailed diagnostics

Selecting and assigning contact surfaces
Choosing the correct elements/mesh
Judicious use of contact compliance
Suppressing oscillations
Properly handling initial penetrations
(Temporary) problem simplification

Assisting Convergence
Use prescribed displacements

Gradually increase loads until contact is well-
established
If iteration trend converging, increase MAX-ITER
Using line search, ATS, Low-speed dynamics, etc.
The basic idea is to stabilize the model and

increase the radius of convergence.

Contact Surface Selection
Given two surfaces how do we choose the contactor
and the target? Some basic considerations:
Inter-penetration condition
Dependent degrees of freedom
Relative stiffness
Guidelines:
Stiffer surface should be the target
Rigid surface should be the target
More coarsely meshed surface should be the target
The contactor surface should not have any
dependent translational DOF (slave nodes).
When there is prescribed displacement on any part
of the contact surface, it must be a target surface
Contact Surface Selection
Recall that target nodes can penetrate
contactor surface segments
Contact
surface 1
Contact
surface 2
Good Selection Poor Selection
Contactor Target
no penetrations surface penetrations surface
Target Contactor
surface surface
The more finely meshed surface
should be the contactor surface.

Finding a Target Segment
Contactor nodes should always
find a target surface segment
Convergence is difficult when

contact forces abruptly change
Contactor nodes may fall off
target in some situations
Extend the target surface
Round the corner of the target
segment definition.
Use the contact surface
extension parameter
Contact Surface Extension Factor CS-EXTENSION

Finding the Correct Target Segment
Contactor nodes can sometimes find
the wrong target surface segment
Can occur in self-contact a) b)
Thickness > 2 x segment length
Thickness < 2 x segment length

Can also occur when the target Wrong
side
surface is defined on both sides of a OK found!
thin 3D-solid body.
Possible when the thickness of the
body is less than twice the contact
segment length.
In this case, the target segments on
the opposite side of the body are
found Single target surface defined
Large distortions, inverted elements around thin green body
Workaround: define a different target surface on the other side of the

thin body, refine target mesh, or switch contact pair assignments.

Establishing Contact
It is difficult for the Newton method to converge when contactor
nodes reverse status during consecutive iterations.
The more contactor nodes, the more iterations are required.
Usually, it is possible to help convergence by cutting back the
time step so that only a few nodes are changing status.
But in some situations, many contactor nodes may change state
during a step, and cutting back the step size will not help:
t t + t
In this case, ATS will not help; need to

establish contact in some other way

Contact Normals
CONTACTSURFACE ORIENTATION
Specifies the orientation of the target segment normal

Definition is only important for target contact surfaces in
single-sided contact
For double-sided contact, the contact normal does not need
to be specified. Direction of the contact surface is
automatically determined by assuming that all contactor
nodes are initially out of contact.
Always be sure to check the normal orientations for shells
and rigid surfaces

Continuous Normals
The program pushes the contactor node in
the direction of the contact normal.
CGROUP CONTINUOUS-NORMAL
CONTINUOUS-NORMAL=NO CONTINUOUS-NORMAL=YES

Continuous Normals
Use care when modeling a
contact surface with sharp
corners. Recall that, by default,
CONTINUOUS-NORMAL=YES.
To ensure that the normal vectors

for segments near the corners are
computed correctly when
modeling target surfaces with
sharp corners:
use discontinuous normal
vectors, or
use small segments near the
corners
*Continuous normals are not
recommended for double-sided contact

Element Selection
First-order meshes are allowed to contact second-order meshes.
First order (linear) elements recommended for the contactor surface.

Equivalent nodal area is always positive for linear elements
Consistent nodal contact forces are always positive
Convergence can be difficult when using second-order elements on
contactor surfaces
Second-order elements can be useful for curved target segments
Avoid 10- and 11-node tets, and 20-node brick elements
Tensile contact forces can develop even when the underlying contact
tractions are compressive!
If this occurs, the node is considered out of contact, unless tension
consistent forces are allowed (TENSION-CONSISTENT=YES).
If a higher-order contactor mesh is required, recommend using 27-node
bricks. These elements satisfy the patch test in contact.

Spotty Contact
Convergence is difficult
when we have spotty
contact:
Fewer nodes are in

contact with a large force
at each contactor node
Nodes in contact can
abruptly change status
during the equilibrium
iterations (giving a large
CFORCE norm)
It is better to have many nodes in contact with small forces at each contactor node,
than to have few nodes in contact with large forces at each contactor node.
One way to do achieve this is to use contact compliance.

Contact Compliance
Diagnostics:
______________________________________________________________________________________________________
Symptoms:
- Contactor nodes still changing status between contact and gap
- Contact nonlinearity
* Add/increase 'Contact Compliance'
* Switch to 'Small Displacement Contact'
Artificially softens the contact surfaces

Helps prevent spotty contact and status reversals
Prevents singularities resulting from over constraining
(e.g., symmetric contact)
Helps reduce oscillations in impact problems

Contact Compliance
CFACTOR1 = 0.0 CFACTOR1 > 0.0
Compliance factor
CFACTOR1 softens contact
surfaces
Allows some penetration,
which is proportional to the
contact forces
Less accurate, but
smoother contact tractions/
better convergence A is the equivalent
nodal area
By default, no contact-compliance is used in the constraint-function method.

This corresponds to a rigid contact surface (no penetration is allowed).

Contact Compliance
Always check the contact

penetrations and ensure
that they are not excessive!

Element Selection
For 10- and 11-node tets, and 20-node brick elements, the equivalent nodal
contact area is zero or negative at the corner nodes.
In this case, contact compliance results in less accurate stresses and contact
tractions. COMPLIANCE NOT RECOMMENDED WITH THESE ELEMENTS!

Energy Storage
Compliant contact
behaves like a spring
between the contact
surfaces
Springs can store energy:
the energy stored by
compliant contact can be
computed and output by
ADINAs energy view
feature
Monitor this energy to
assess if the contact
compliance factor is too
high.

Energy Storage
Compliant contact
behaves like a spring
between the contact
surfaces
Springs can store energy:
the energy stored by
compliant contact can be
computed and output by
ADINAs energy view
feature
Monitor this energy to
assess if the contact
compliance factor is too
high.

Effects of Contact Penetrations
Dynamic impact of 2 elastic
bars
Bottom bar fixed at an end
Top bar approaching with Initial
an initial velocity Contact
motion
pair
Perfectly elastic problem;
ideally, kinetic energy and
elastic energy will always
sum to 100% of total.
By computing the energy

stored by contact Fixed end
compliance, we can
assess the accuracy of the Interested in demonstrating the effects
contact solution of contact compliance by comparing the
effects of parameterizing CFACTOR1
CFACTOR1=0.0
No penetration

Should be zero
energy stored as
a result of zero
penetrations
Expected
contact
duration

CFACTOR1>0.0
} Penetration

Should be zero
energy stored as
a result of zero
penetrations
Expected
contact
duration

Should be zero
energy stored as
a result of zero
penetrations
Expected
contact
duration

Should be zero
energy stored as
a result of zero
penetrations
Expected
contact
duration

Should be zero
energy stored as
a result of zero
penetrations
Expected
contact
duration

Should be zero
energy stored as
a result of zero
penetrations
Expected
contact
duration

Large amount of energy
stored by penetrations!
Longer
contact
duration
(inaccurate)

Remarks
Contact compliance is a powerful tool, but it must be used carefully! Do not
sacrifice accuracy for easier convergence without considering the
consequences.
The compliance factor must be set by trial & error and is model-dependent
Begin with CFACTOR1=1.0e-5
Check penetrations and energy storage (penetrations CFACTOR1)
Adjust CFACTOR1 accordingly
Impact is highly sensitive to contact penetration. Compliance artificially

softens the contact surface, which:
artificially reduces the impact forces by energy stored in contact surfaces
artificially increases the impact durations
Use the smallest compliance factor that converges to an accurate result.

Always check penetrations!

Initial Penetrations
CGROUP INITIAL-PENETRATION
By default, if there is a penetration between a contact node and a target
segment in the first solution step, ADINA attempts to eliminate the
penetration (INITIAL-PENETRATION=ALLOWED)
ADINA can eliminate the penetration at the first step or over a user-specified
interval using the TIMEPENETRATION parameter. This feature is useful if the
initial penetrations are too large to be eliminated in a single time step.
The program can also calculate initial penetrations at the start of solution and
ignore them in future steps (INITIAL-PENETRATION=DISCARDED):
If the initial geometric gap is positive or zero (no penetration): The contact
gap is set equal to the geometric gap.
If the initial geometric gap is negative (penetration): This initial penetration
is recorded and the contact gap is set equal to the geometric gap minus
the initial penetration.

Checking for Initial Penetrations
CGROUP INITIAL-PENETRATION=PRINT
NODE OVERLAP TARGET TARGET TARGET SEGMENT NODES (UP TO 4)
LABEL SURFACE SEGMENT N1 N2 N3 N4
110844 0.168374E-02 2 21725 34413 25570 28255 34413

110857 0.303387E-02 2 21725 34413 25570 28255 34413
CONTACT GROUP 1 HAS 2 INITIALLY PENETRATING CONTACTOR NODES
*** WARNING NO. A3 ***

Contact group 1 has 2 initially penetrating contactor nodes
Maximum penetration: 0.303387E-02
Decide if penetrations are physically

meaningful or due to discretization
It is also possible to visually inspect

for initial penetrations
For very large or complex models:
Use a large compliance factor
(allow for large penetrations)
Run for a single time step
Render overlap bandplot Visual Inspection

Eliminating Initial Penetrations
CGROUP TIMEPENETRATION
Initial penetrations can be eliminated

immediately or over some finite interval of time

Ignoring (Discarding)
INITIAL-PENETRATION=DISCARDED
Useful when these penetrations

are just a product of the finite
element discretization as in the
case of concentric cylinders
NOTE: The initial penetrations

calculated at each contactor node
are not valid for large rotations.
Ignoring initial penetrations alone
will not permit modelling of
bearings.
Always check initial penetrations

before ignoring them

Bearings
Second-order
elements on target
(curved segments)
For bearings, it is better to use a finer mesh or use second-

order elements on target (target segments will be curved).

Gap Override
INITIAL-PENETRATION=GAP-OVERRIDE
Gaps and penetrations from finite element mesh replaced by a user-specified value.
Useful for shrink-fits and contact involving curved meshes.
NOTE: this will override the gaps and penetrations for all contactor nodes in the group!

Friction
Diagnostics: ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
- Nodes switching from stick to slip. 8 nodes including node 2862
with contact force increase = 1.482E+00,
slip velocity = 7.099E-01
- Nodes switching from slip to stick. 15 nodes including node 260
with contact force = 4.768E+02
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Diagnostics:
______________________________________________________________________________________________________
Symptoms:
- Contactor nodes still changing status between contact and gap
- Contactor nodes still changing status between stick and slip
- Contact nonlinearity
* Add/increase 'Contact Compliance'
* Switch to 'Small Displacement Contact'
- Friction nonlinearity
* Increase 'Friction v-Function Parameter (EPST)'
Add/increase 'Contact Compliance

Friction
Time is not a dummy variable in (quasi)static
analyses involving frictional contact!
Ft Ft
Fn Fn
-T T
u u
Ideal friction Friction model, T specified
Sticking velocity EPST (Frictional Contact v-Function Parameter):

maximum velocity for sticking conditions
Sliding occurs even when Ft /Fn < . Stiction cant be modelled.

Friction
Time is not a dummy variable in (quasi)static
analyses involving frictional contact!
Parameter EPST has units of length per time.
Frictional behavior depends on the problems time and length

scales. Thus, parameter EPST is problem specific and will affect
predicted slipping/sticking behavior.
Greater EPST, smoother behavior (better convergence)

Smaller EPST, more accurate behavior
But what is the best way to select a value for EPST to avoid
numerical difficulties while preserving accuracy?

Selecting EPST
There is no general value of T that will work in all cases. It must
be set by the user for each specific problem.
The user should estimate the sliding velocity. T should be set to
one or two orders of magnitude smaller than that velocity.
In static analyses, divide the sliding distance by the increment of
time (e.g., use time steps of 1.0).
Diagnostics:
______________________________________________________________________________________________________
** SUCCESSFUL CONVERGENCE ANALYSIS **
- Maximum sliding contact velocity = 2.393E+01. Maximum at node = 11272
Default value of T is 1.0e-3.

T = 0.0 is internally replaced by 1.0e-3

Friction Delay
Parameter FRIC-DELAY can be used to allow friction to start
acting one step after contact is established
Significantly improves convergence
Removes nonlinearities associated with friction until after
contact is established
Useful for problems with initial penetrations: 1st step will be
frictionless
Not necessarily less accurate:

A nodes relative sliding velocity cannot be uniquely determined
at the first time step
In reality, contact begins at some time between t and t + t
With friction delay, contact begins at t + t rather than time t

Oscillations
Diagnostics: -------------------------------------------------
- Oscillating solution, which repeats every 3 iterations.
--------------------------------------------------------------
The same few contactor nodes

(perhaps a single node)
oscillate between multiple
target segments.
Often times, the oscillations
are between two acceptable
solutions.
ADINA can suppress these
oscillations by associating the
contactor node(s) with one of
its targets segments after a
certain number of iterations.
By default, CONTACT-CONTROL NSUPPRESS=0.
To activate suppression control, set NSUPPRESS
to some positive integer value.

Using NSUPPRESS
This feature is only effective when
given the chance to work properly.
MAX-ITER=30
Basic NSUPPRESS usage guidelines:
NSUPPRESS=20
Should not totally prevent contactor
nodes from associating with target
segments.
Should stop unwanted oscillatory
behavior by iteration MAX-ITER 5
to allow for convergence.
say, MAX-ITER=30
then: 15 < NSUPPRESS < MAX-ITER 5
Will permit real incremental contactor node movement and
suppress unwanted oscillations well before MAX-ITER.

Using NSUPPRESS
Contactor Node
Contactor node
Target
Face1
segment 2
Target
segment 1
Face2
Contactor node oscillating between

target segments 1 and 2
In this case, switching target and contactor surfaces

was of no help (symmetric contact was required).

Improperly Supported Bodies
In some problems (e.g., forming) there are unsuppressed rigid

body modes before contact is established.
Apply prescribed displacements to establish contact
Stabilize the model using:
Stiffness matrix stabilization
Low-Speed Dynamics
Contact damping
Prevent large motions as surfaces come into contact
Use limiting maximum incremental displacements feature
Use small initial steps until contact is established

Contact Damping
CGROUP DAMPING
Adds normal and tangential viscous dampers to all contactor

and target nodes
Damping can act only in the first time step (DAMPING=INITIAL)
or remain constant through out the analysis
(DAMPING=CONSTANT)
If it remains constant, the energy associated with damping is
written in .out file
Will damp out low frequency (rigid body) modes
Caution: can also damp out higher frequencies which may be of
interest in dynamic analyses

Temporary Simplifications
Reducing complexity improves signal to noise ratio in .out file and
facilitates solving one convergence issue at a time.
Material nonlinearities
Extend plasticity curves (prevent rupture)
Specify a positive strain hardening modulus
Loading
Specify deformation independent loading
Apply prescribed displacements to establish contact
Apply loads more gradually
Establish contact in stages
Stage 1: eliminate penetrations (without friction) over finite time
Stage 2: apply service loads

Other Strategies
Add boundary conditions

Use stiffness stabilization
Use Low-Speed Dynamics
Use damping (contact or Rayleigh)
Limit maximum displacements
Use line search/toggle plasticity algorithm
Use prescribed displacements instead of forces where
possible
Run an implicit dynamic analysis using the Bathe method

9 Contactmodeling

Caricato da

Informazioni sul documento

Titolo originale

Copyright

Formati disponibili

Condividi questo documento

Condividi o incorpora il documento

Opzioni di condivisione

Hai trovato utile questo documento?

Questo contenuto è inappropriato?

Copyright:

Formati disponibili

9 Contactmodeling

Caricato da

Copyright:

Formati disponibili

Contact Analysis:

Arturo Valentin, PhD

ADINA R&D, Inc., 2016 1

ADINA R&D, Inc., 2016 2

ADINA R&D, Inc., 2016 3

Cannot expect quadratic convergence unless contact behavior has stabilized!

ADINA R&D, Inc., 2016 4

ADINA R&D, Inc., 2016 5

Enabling detailed diagnostics

ADINA R&D, Inc., 2016 6

Causes the .out file to be larger (but

Also offers Symptoms and probable

ADINA R&D, Inc., 2016 7

ADINA R&D, Inc., 2016 8

Trend: Iterations are neither converging nor diverging

Most probable causes and remedies:

NOTE: Before making any of the suggested modifications,

ADINA R&D, Inc., 2016 9

i.e., carefully consider the consequences of the

Enabling detailed diagnostics

ADINA R&D, Inc., 2016 10

Use prescribed displacements

The basic idea is to stabilize the model and

ADINA R&D, Inc., 2016 11

ADINA R&D, Inc., 2016 13

Convergence is difficult when

Contact Surface Extension Factor CS-EXTENSION

ADINA R&D, Inc., 2016 14

Can occur in self-contact a) b)

Thickness > 2 x segment length

Thickness < 2 x segment length

Workaround: define a different target surface on the other side of the

ADINA R&D, Inc., 2016 15

In this case, ATS will not help; need to

ADINA R&D, Inc., 2016 16

Specifies the orientation of the target segment normal

ADINA R&D, Inc., 2016 17

ADINA R&D, Inc., 2016 18

To ensure that the normal vectors

ADINA R&D, Inc., 2016 19

First order (linear) elements recommended for the contactor surface.

ADINA R&D, Inc., 2016 20

Fewer nodes are in

One way to do achieve this is to use contact compliance.

ADINA R&D, Inc., 2016 21

Trend: Iterations are neither converging nor diverging

Most probable causes and remedies:

Artificially softens the contact surfaces

ADINA R&D, Inc., 2016 22

By default, no contact-compliance is used in the constraint-function method.

ADINA R&D, Inc., 2016 23

Always check the contact

ADINA R&D, Inc., 2016 24

CFACTOR1 = 0.0 CFACTOR1 > 0.0

ADINA R&D, Inc., 2016 25

ADINA R&D, Inc., 2016 26

ADINA R&D, Inc., 2016 27

By computing the energy

ADINA R&D, Inc., 2016 29

ADINA R&D, Inc., 2016 30

ADINA R&D, Inc., 2016 31

ADINA R&D, Inc., 2016 32

ADINA R&D, Inc., 2016 33

* WARNING NO. A3 *