Sei sulla pagina 1di 117

ASSESSING THE IMPACT OF OVERDEPENDENCE ON

OIL REVENUE TO NIGERIA ECONOMY

BY
IJEH CHUKWUEMEKA ANTHONY
PG/MBA/07/46774

DEPARTMENT OF MANAGEMENT
FACULTY OF BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION
UNIVERSITY OF NIGERIA, ENUGU CAMPUS

NOVEMBER, 2010

1
TITLE PAGE

ASSESSING THE IMPACT OF OVERDEPENDENCE ON OIL


REVENUE TO NIGERIA ECONOMY

BY
IJEH CHUKWUEMEKA ANTHONY
PG/MBA/07/46774

A PROJECT SUBMITTED TO THE DEPARTMENT OF


MANAGEMENT, FACULTY OF BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION,
UNIVERSITY OF NIGERIA, ENUGU CAMPUS IN PARTIAL
FULFILMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE AWARD OF
MASTER OF BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION (MBA) IN
MANAGEMENT

SUPERVISOR: DR. C.A. EZIGBO

NOVEMBER, 2010
2
APPROVAL PAGE

The project has been approved for the Department of Management.

.. ..
Dr. C.A. Ezigbo Date
(Supervisor)

. ..
Prof. U.J.F. Ewurum Date
(Head of Department)

3
CERTIFICATION

Ijeh, Chukwuemeka Anthony a postgraduate student in the

Department of Management with Registration Number

PG/MBA/07/46774 has satisfactorily completed the requirements

for the course and research work for the award of Master of

Business Administration (MBA) in Management.

The work embodied in this project is original and has not been

submitted in part or full for any degree of this or any other

university.

.
Dr. C. A. Ezigbo Date
(Supervisor)

.. .
Prof. U.J.F. Ewurum Date
(Head of Department)

. ...
IjehChukwuemeka Anthony Date
(Student)

4
DEDICATION

This project is dedicated to God Almighty and my beloved parents

Sir and Lady E.U. Ijeh for their prayers and financial support

throughout the duration of the programme.

5
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT

An excellent and successful academic work would not have been a

reality without the unalloyed support, aid, advice and

encouragement of well meaning individuals in the society.

My immense thanks first go to the Almighty God for his enabling

grace and love in making the entire programme a success.

My gratitude goes to my project supervisor Dr. C.A. Ezigbo whose

guidance, tolerance, constructive criticisms and understanding

provided the basis for the successful completion of this project.

My thanks also go to the Head of Department Prof. U.J.F. Ewurum

and all the lecturers and Non-academic staff of the Department of

Management for their academic support.

My sincere and special thanks also go to my parents Sir and Lady

E.U. Ijeh for their prayers, efforts as well as their moral and

financial support throughout the duration of the programme. I also

appreciate my siblings, Emmanuel Ijeh (Jnr), Robinson Ijeh,

Christopher Ijeh and my beloved sister Vivian AdaoraIjeh including

Mr. Paul Ijeh, Mr. Wale Ijeh, Mrs. Igba and Mrs. Menye for their

assistance and moral advice.

6
Worthy of recognition are my close friends and course mates,

Richard Ngatu, TerveshimaIgba, Betty, IfeomaIfejika, Nkechi,

Kingsley and Cyril Ukwueze and others who are of assistance in my

academic victory.

Finally, I thank God to whom all the glory is due for his faithfulness.

7
ABSTRACT

The research is on Assessing the Impact of Overdependence on Oil


Revenue to Nigeria Economy. The main objective of this study is to
assess the impact of overdependence on oil revenue to Nigeria
economy. Data for this research were obtained from both primary
and secondary sources. The questionnaire served as the main
instrument for data collection. Interview was also conducted so as to
obtain more data. Data analyses were done through the use of
tabular presentation and percentages. Hypotheses were tested
through Chi-square (X2).
The major findings of this study are as follows:
1. Overdependence on oil revenue has more positive impact than
negative impact on Nigerias economic development.
2. Agriculture, Tourism, Taxation & Solid minerals are factors
that could minimize Nigerias overdependence on oil revenue.
On the basis of the above findings, the study concludes that
Nigerian economic growth is highly depended on the oil revenue.
Hence, if there is a glut and fall in oil price in international market,
it may be a great disaster on the economy and to the citizenry of the
country.
From the findings of this study, the following are recommendations:
1. The Nigerian government should focus on the need for
diversification into other sources of revenue in order not to be
affected by fall of oil price in the international market.
2. The government should develop other sectors of the economy
such as agricultural sector, and industrial sector by providing
incentives such as tax concession, provision of facilities needed
by these sectors in order to boost more production.

8
TABLE OF CONTENTS

Title page - - - - - - - - - - i
Approval page - - - - - - - - - ii
Certification - - - - - - - - - iii
Dedication - - - - - - - - - iv
Acknowledgements - - - - - - - - v
Abstract - - - - - - - - - - vii
Table of contents - - - - - - - - viii

CHAPTER ONE: INTRODUCTION


1.1 Background of the Study - - - - - - 1
1.2 Statement of the Problem - - - - - - 5
1.3 Objectives of the Study - - - - - - 5
1.4 Research Questions - - - - - - - 6
1.5 Research Hypotheses - - - - - - 7
1.6 Significance of the Study - - - - - - 8
1.7 Scope of the Study - - - - - - - 9
1.8 Limitation of the study - - - - - - 9
1.9 Definition of Terms - - - - - - - 10
References

CHAPTER TWO: REVIEW OF RELATED LITERATURE


2.1 History of Crude Oil in Nigeria - - - - - 13
2.2 The Performance of the Oil Sector in Nigeria - - 15

9
2.3 The Impact of Petroleum Sub-Sector on
the Nigerian Economy - - - - - - 20
2.3.1The Negative Impact of Petroleum Sub-Sector
on the Nigerian Economy - - - - - - 21
2.3.2The Positive Impact of Petroleum Sub-sector on
the Nigerian Economy - - - - - - 28
2.4 Impact of Overdependence of Budget on Oil Revenue - 38
2.5 The Need for Independent Revenue Mobilization
for Nigerian Economy - - - - - - 40
2.5.1 State Government and Internal Revenue Mobilization 42
2.5.2 Local Government Revenue Mobilization - - - 42
2.6 Challenges in the Oil Sector - - - - - 44
2.7 Attempts Made by Government to Improve Non-Oil
Sectors - - - - - - - - - 46
2.8 The Level of Importation of Petroleum Products in
Nigeria - - - - - - - - - 48
2.9 Factors that Could Minimize Nigerias Over-
dependence on Oil Revenue - - - - - 51
References

CHAPTER THREE: RESEARCH METHODOLOGY


3.1 Sources of Data - - - - - - - 59
3.2 Population and Sample Size Determination - - 60
3.3 Description of Research Instrument - - - - 61
3.4 Data Analysis Technique - - - - - - 62

10
3.5 Validity of the- Research Instrument - - - - 64
3.6 Reliability of the Research Instrument - - - -
64 References

CHAPTER FOUR: DATA PRESENTATION, ANALYSIS


AND INTERPRETATION

CHAPTER FIVE: SUMMARY OF FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS AND


RECOMMENDATIONS
5.1 Summary of Findings - - - - - - 94
5.2 Conclusions - - - - - - - - 95
5.3 Recommendations - - - - - - - 95
Bibliography
Appendix

11
CHAPTER ONE

1.0 INTRODUCTION

1.1 BACKGROUND OF THE STUDY

Oil is a major source of energy in Nigeria and the world in general.

Before the advent of oil (Crude oil), agriculture used to be the

mainstay of the Nigerian economy which plays a vital role in shaping

the economic and political destiny of the country (Abolaji1985:2).

In 1960s, agricultural products provided about 80% of the total

export earnings and the main cash crops were cocoa, palm oil,

groundnut etc. In 1962, agriculture accounted for about N229.8

million or 82% of the nations total values of export. Moreso, in 1964

a total of N356.4 million was realized which represented 85% of the

countrys total export for that year.

According to Ezeagu (1979:9), the exportation of agricultural

products was really thriving during these years. However, by 1976

out of N274.2 million that came from export, agriculture

accountedonly for 4% of the nations earnings, even with the take-

over of export financing by the Finance Development House, the

earnings from the non-oil export (which agriculture products

12
dominated) have not improved by the end of 1991. It only managed

to provide 3.8% out of the total revenue. This was as a result of the

oil boom and excess dependence on its revenue or earnings.

During this time, the need and consumption pattern shifted and

became import oriented. Thus, the insatiable desire for importation

of goods became widespread in the nation with its attendant

economic problems.

According to the Statistical Bulletin 1997:60 of the Federal Bureau

of Statistics, the 1970s witnessed a drastic change of Nigeria

economy from one share of agriculture to Gross Domestic Product

(G.D.P) which drastically dropped from about 40% in the early

1970s to about 20% in the 1980s and even 16% in the 1990s. Since

the oil sector assumed a wider dimension to account for about 20%

of Gross Domestic Product (G.D.P), it also accounted for 81% of

government revenue and 96% of export earnings.

Sequel to the oil boom of the 1970s, spectacular change that crept

into the Nigerian economy with devastating effect still lingers on till

today.

13
The heavy dependence on oil as the main source of revenue to the

economy was highly vulnerable. Agriculture was completely

neglected to the extent that Nigeria began to import agricultural

products which were previously exported. The oil revenue kept

declining and the celebrated boom of 1970s became a doom for

the country.

Following the glut in the international oil market from 1982 to date,

the countrys projected revenue has never been attained due to

instability in the price of oil, for instance as at September 1985, the

total federally collected revenue was N20.287 billion. Arene

(1985:25).

In 1987, N29.44 billion was projected as federally collected revenue,

out of which N28.53 billion was envisaged to come from the oil

sector. This raises the question of how successful or to what extent

can this sum be realized when the vagaries of oil market are

considered?

To this end, President Olusegun Obasanjo buttressed his optimism

in which he stated, As a nation, we should be sensitive to oil but

not panic at the falling process rather we should pursue vigorously

14
the current programme already put in place to diversify revenue

sources (Statistical Bulletin 1999:80).

To all intents and purposes, the strengths and weaknesses of Nigeria

economy are tremendously being subjected to the dictates of oil

revenue. It could easily be seen that Nigeria virtually has no control

on the foreign exchange which is in high demand in the country

because of excessive importation of foreign goods which is as a

result of underdevelopment on the part of our industries, for

example, cottage industry.

Furthermore, there is optimism on the part of the federal

government inspite of the instability of the oil market, that the

selling price of the crude oil would be $14 per barrel with the

production base of 1.355 million barrels per day. It is imperative on

the part of the government to seek alternative source to supplement

oil as the major source of revenue.

Moreover, some major areas have been suggested by the experts as a

possible solution that can help salvage the present economic

situation. These are agriculture, mining, deregulation and promoting

manufacturing industries.

15
1.2 STATEMENT OF THE PROBLEM

Crude oil discovery has had certain impacts on the Nigeria economy

both positively and adversely. On the negative side, this can be

considered with respect to the surrounding communities within

which the oil wells are exploited. Some of these communities still

suffer environmental degradation, which leads to deprivation of

means of livelihood and other economic and social factors. Although

large proceeds are obtained from the domestic sales and export of

petroleum products, its effect on the growth of the Nigerian economy

as regards returns and productivity is still questionable. Thus the

study focuses on the impact of overdependence on oil revenue to

Nigeria economy.

1.3 OBJECTIVES OF THE STUDY

The specific objectives of the study include the following:

1. To assess the impact of overdependence on oil revenue to

Nigeria economy.

2. To determine the factors that could minimize Nigerias

overdependence on oil revenue.

16
3. To assess the level of importation of petroleum products in

Nigeria.

4. To evaluate the problems encountered by the Nigerian oil

sector.

1.4 RESEARCH QUESTIONS

The research questions postulated for this study include the

following:

1. What is the impact of overdependence on oil revenue to

Nigeria economy.

2. What are the factors that could minimize Nigerias

overdependence on oil revenue.

3. What is the level of importation of petroleum products in

Nigeria.

4. What are the problems encountered by the Nigerian oil

sector.

17
1.5 RESEARCH HYPOTHESES

For the purpose of this study, the following research hypotheses will

be tested.

1. Ho: Overdependence on oil revenue has more negative impact

than positive impact on Nigerias economic development.

H1 : Overdependence on oil revenue has more positive impact

than negative impact on Nigerias economic development.

2. Ho: Agriculture, Tourism, Taxation and Solid minerals are not

factors that could minimize Nigerias overdependence on oil

revenue.

H1 : Agriculture, Tourism, Taxation and Solid minerals are the

factors that could minimize Nigerias overdependence on oil

revenue.

3. Ho: The level of importation of petroleum products in Nigeria

is high.

H1: The level of importation of petroleum products in Nigeria is

low.

18
4. Ho: Poor funding of investments, Communal disturbances,

Smuggling and diversion of petroleum products and Products

adulteration are not problems encountered by the Nigerian oil

sector

H1: Poor funding of investments, Communal disturbances,

Smuggling and diversion of petroleum products and Products

adulteration are the problems encountered by the Nigerian oil

sector.

1.6 SIGNIFICANCE OF THE STUDY

The study is significant because it assesses the impact of Nigerias

overdependence on oil revenue. Also, the study will help direct

attention of the federal government and the oil sector on the need for

diversification into other sources of revenue like agriculture, for

economic growth.

It will also serve as a reference for future researchers in the same

field.

19
1.7 SCOPE OF THE STUDY

The study is on assessing the impact of overdependence on oil

revenue to Nigeria economy. The study focuses on the impact of

overdependence on oil revenue to Nigeria economy, factors that

could minimize Nigerias overdependence on oil revenue, the level of

importation of petroleum products in Nigeria and problems

encountered by the Nigerian oil sector.

However, the study will be carried out in the Federal Ministry of

Finance, Abuja.

1.8 LIMITATION OF THE STUDY

The main constraints of the study include the following:

a. Time

Due to the limited time given for the study, the researcher

could not get all the required information needed for the study.

20
b. Finance

The researcher has not got enough money to embark on the

study and therefore could not visit places where information

relevant to the study could be obtained.

c. Attitude of the Respondents

The attitude of the respondents affected the research work

because some of the respondents were unwilling to co-operate

with the researcher. They felt they have nothing to benefit from

the study.

1.9 DEFINITION OF TERMS

a. Crude Oil

Mixture of naturally occurring hydrocarbon that is refined into

diesel, gasoline, heating oil, jet fuel, kerosene, and literally

thousands of other products called petrochemicals.

b. Gross Domestic Product (GDP)

This refers to the total value of all the goods and services produced

in a country in a year. It is concerned with domestic production and

does not, include net income from abroad.

21
c. Petroleum Products

These are useful materials derived from crude oil (petroleum) as it is

processed in oil refineries.

d. Downstream Sector

The downstream sector of the petroleum industry is a part of the

industry that is responsible for final processing, product distribution

and marketing.

e. Deregulation

This is an act by which the government of a particular industry is

reduced or eliminated in order to create and foster a more efficient

market place.

22
REFERENCES

Abayomi, Y.O. (1977), Revenue Diversification. C.B.N. Bullion:

12(3).

Ugwuanyi, W. (1999), Agricultural Financial Management and Food

Marketing. (1st Edition), Lagos: John Kens and Willy

Publication, Ltd.

23
CHAPTER TWO

REVIEW OF RELATED LITERATURE

2.1 HISTORY OF CRUDE OIL IN NIGERIA

According to C.B.N Bullion Vol.3(13), Oil exploration started in

Nigeria in 1908 by the German Company, Nigeria Bitumen

Corporation, in the Araromi area of the present Ondo State. Their

pioneering effort ended due to the out break of the First World War

in 1914.

In 1937, oil prospecting was resumed by Shell DArcy (forerunner of

the present Shell Petroleum Development Company of Nigeria). The

company was awarded the sole concessionary right covering the

whole territory of Nigeria.

As it was in the beginning, their activities were again interrupted by

the Second World War but resumed in 1947. It was only in 1956

however that oil was discovered in commercial quantities at Oloibiri

in the Niger Delta Area. And in 1958, oil production and export

started from this field by 1961, other companies such as Mobil,

Chevron (formally Gulf), Agip, Safarap (Elf) e.t.c had commenced

exploration activities for oil in on-shore and off-shore area of Nigeria.

24
Consequently, the exploration rights formally granted shell alone

was extended to these new comers.

From an initial quantity of 5,100 barrels per day from the Oloibiri

field, the quantity doubled the following year and by 1972, crude oil

exports from Nigeria rose to 2.0 million barrel per day and reached a

peak of 2.4 million barrel per day in 1979. Consequently, Nigeria

attained the status of a major oil producer, ranking sixth in the

world.

In the early period, Government interest in oil exploration was only

limited to the collection of royalties from the companies and making

rudimentary laws to regulate the activities of the oil industry. This

low interest was partly due to the insignificant contribution of the

commodity to Nigerias economy before the late sixties and the

relatives lack of trained personnel and expertise. By 1971 however,

oil had assumed a different dimension in terms of importance to the

economy. To strengthen and establish government control in the

industry, the Nigerias National Oil Corporation (NNOC) was

established by Decree in 1971. Also in that year Nigeria joined the

OPEC as the 11th member nation.

25
The NNOC was accorded the responsibility for both upstream and

downstream activities in the oil industry. But the regulatory

functions were vested in the Ministry of Petroleum Resources.

As a result of all these developments, Government had acquired a

new stature and so decided to participate actively in the industrys

activities.

In April 1, 1977, a merger was effected between the NNOC and the

Ministry of Petroleum Resources which gave birth to the Nigerian

National Petroleum Corporation (NNPC). NNPC combined the

commercial functions of the NNOC with the regulatory functions of

Ministry of Petroleum Resources. This was to prevent unnecessary

duplication of effort and possible unhealthy rivalry that could be

inimical to the national economy.

2.2 THE PERFORMANCE OF THE OIL SECTOR IN NIGERIA

Odularu(2008), asserts that the Nigerian oil sector can be

categorized into three main sub-sectors, namely, upstream,

downstream and gas. The most problematic over the years has been

the downstream sector, which is the distribution arm and

26
connection with final consumers of refined petroleum products in

the domestic economy. The incessant crisis in supply of products

culminated in the decision by Government in 2003 to deregulate the

downstream sub-sector. However, the manner of its implementation

has been controversial because it ignores the economic realities in

Nigeria.

Oil production by the joint venture (JV) companies accounts for

about 95% of Nigerias crude oil production. Shell, which operates

the largest joint venture in Nigeria, with 55% Government interest

(through the Nigerian National Petroleum Corporation, NNPC),

produces about 50% of Nigerias crude oil. ExxonMobil, Chevron

Texaco, Eni/Agip and TotalFinaElf operate the other JVs, in which

the NNPC has 60% stake.

The overdependence on oil has created vulnerability to the vagaries

of the international market, as observed in the proceeding section

that show the contribution of oil to some macro-economic variables.

In particular, the place of oil in the mind of the average Nigerian has

become more profound since the deregulation of the downstream

segment of the Nigerian oil industry in 2003.

27
The contradiction is more glaring now with the recent rise in crude

oil prices at the global markets, which meant more external earnings

for Nigeria, but also increased the expense burden on imported

refined petroleum products. It is such contradictions that make the

Nigerian economy appear strange at times, as policies seem to ignore

what appears obvious to do. As such, policies designed to address

the deficiencies and defects in the structure end up being poorly

articulated and/or implemented because of regional, political or

rent-seeking selfish interests.

Obviously, it is the same rent-seekers that continually sabotage the

reinvigoration of the domestic refineries, making Nigeria to depend

on importation of refined products to meet the domestic need. At

present, Nigeria has four refineries, with a combined installed

refinery capacity of 445,000 barrels per day (bpd). Theses four

refineries are:

The first Port Harcourt Refinery was commissioned in 1965

with an installed capacity of 35,000 barrels per day and later

expanded to 60,000 barrels per day.

28
The Warri Refinery was commissioned in 1978 with an

installed refining capacity 100,000 barrels per day, and

upgraded to 125,000 barrels per day in 1986.

The Kaduna refinery was commissioned in 1980 with an

installed refining capacity of 100,000 barrels per day, and

upgraded to 110,000 barrels per day in 1986.

The second Port Harcourt refinery was commissioned in 1989

with 150,000 barrels per day processing capacity, and

designed to fulfill the dual role of supplying the domestic

market and exporting its surplus.

The combined capacities of these refineries exceed the domestic

consumption of refined products, chief of which is premium motor

spirit (gasoline), whose demand is stated at 33 million litres daily.

The refineries are however, operating far below their installed

capacities, as they were more or less abandoned during the military

era, skipping the routine and mandatory turn around maintenance

that made products importation inevitable. Importation

notwithstanding, there have been persistent product shortages that

29
gave strength to the argument for deregulation of the downstream oil

sub-sector in Nigeria.

The monetization of oil revenue has been a major factor in liquidity

management in Nigeria. Measuring liquidity as the narrow and

broad money definitions by the CBN, the early 1990s saw increases

that were dampened in 1995 up until the civilian administration

came on board in 1999.

The new Government maintained disciplined fiscal operations for

about one year and thereafter, the floodgates were opened. Since

then, the CBN has been battling to keep liquidity in check, in order

to ensure that it does not create adverse effects on the three key

macroeconomic prices (i.e. interest rate, exchange rate and inflation

rate).

The greatest challenge is when Nigeria generates more revenue from

crude oil sales than it budgeted, like now. Such excesses have

always been monetized, creating marketing distortions and

inflationary pressure. Adedipe (2004).

The same argument goes for deficit fiscal operations in comparison

to the GDP. The pattern of this ratio indicates the optimism that

30
accompanies increase in oil revenue and makes government to

engage in frivolous spending or unnecessary projects. Deficit

spending invariably makes government resort to borrowing from the

Central Bank through the instrument of Ways and Means Advances,

which later convert into short-term debt instruments that are quite

expensive to service at market rates.

2.3 THE IMPACT OF PETROLEUM SUB-SECTOR ON THE

NIGERIAN ECONOMY

According to Ikem (1979), the simple measure of any economy is the

Gross Domestic Product (GDP) which is defined as the value of all

goods and services produced in a given year. One of such sector is

the petroleum sector. The economy is made up of not only the

sectors but also the institutions and operators of both sectors and

the resources (natural and human). The Federal, State and Local

governments, through their annual budgets, operate the economy

and various sectors of the economy. It is conceivable that the

operation of the sectors such as Petroleum has some impacts on the

economy, the performance of the economy also has impacts on the

31
operation of the sector. Each sector is funded in the national budget

and the contribution of all the sectors in any year makes up the

annual budget.

According to Ikem (1979:2), the petroleum industry has had both

positive and negative impacts on the Nigeria economy and there has

been more negative than positive impacts due to poor

implementation of government policies. His position was not shared

by ProfessorAluko who argued that Niger Delta areas have gained

more from petroleum development than Non-Niger Delta areas of the

country.

2.3.1 The Negative Impact of Petroleum Sub-Sector on the

Economy

According to Ikem (1979:2), there is one school of thought, which

holds that the development of petroleum in Nigeria was more a curse

than a credit to the economy. The reasons advanced by this school

are based on the following:

1. Over-dependence on Crude Oil

This has a number of implications, neglect of non-oil sector, a

monoculture economy which is vulnerable to the vagaries of

32
international oil market, among others. Government dependence on

crude oil is reflected on crude oil contribution to gross domestic

product, total government revenue, total level of external reserves

and foreign exchange earnings. This indicated that the economy

since 1975, following the quadrupling of crude oil prices in the world

market in 1973/74, depended on the crude oil sector for more than

80% of foreign exchange earning and value of export, and over 60%

for total revenue. In real terms, the petroleum sector has accounted

for 13 to 22% of the country gross domestic product. In 1980 when

crude oil price of Nigerias Bonny Light was close to $41,000 a

barrel, the sector accounted for 22% of the gross domestic product.

The only sector which accounted more than the petroleum sector in

Nigerias gross domestic product in the 1980s and 1990s is the

agricultural sector. Before 1970 the contribution of the petroleum

sector to the gross domestic product was less than 4%, les than 20%

in value of exports, less than 27% in total revenue and foreign

exchange earnings.

Thus, before 1970 the non-oil sector contributed more to the

economy than the oil sector. The reverse is true in the 1980s and

33
1990s. Hence, Nigerias overdependence on the petroleum sector for

revenue for meeting expenditure needs is borne out by available

statistics.

According to McPherson (2000:9), he wrote that overdependence on

oil causes excessive credit expansion, i.e. when oil revenue get into

the domestic banking system, they are likely to restructure

excessive credit expansion, threatening financial stability. He also

noted that oil development can take resources and investment away

from other sectors of the economy.

2. Neglect of Other Sectors of the Economy

So much has been written on the poor performance of the non-oil

sectors of the economy particularly in their contribution to value of

exports included in non-oil sector made up of roadside economic

activities, including market activities, which are not captured in the

calculation of the gross domestic product, because gains from

petroleum development came from exertion of government and joint

venture oil companies, there was the temptation to go for the fast

tract rather than for slow process of revenue generation in the

agricultural sector, compared with other sectors like manufacturing

34
and solid minerals. Moreover the gestation period between

investment and returns on investment was quicker in the petroleum

sector than other sector. Financiers of projects found the petroleum

sector more promising for realizing returns on their investments

than non-petroleum sector. The markets for petroleum and

petroleum products were more attractive and world wide than the

market for non-petroleum products.

Available statistics shows that Nigeria has proven oil reserves of up

to 25 billion barrels, about 2.2% of total world crude oil reserves, it

also has as much gas reserves and deposits of bitumen. In addition,

it has ample reserves of coal, hydropower, and renewable energy

resources. Over the years the concentration of the government has

been the exploitation of crude oil to the neglect of other non-oil

energy resources with the exception of coal, the exploitation of which

suffered neglect due to Nigerian Civil War.

Another sector that suffered serious neglect is the solid minerals.

Studies carried out by the Geological Survey Department of Ministry

of Solid Minerals, the Raw Materials and Development Council, the

Nigerian Mining Council and the National Steel Council, shows that

35
Nigeria has several mineral resources of commercial quantity and

which could be exploited for export and for domestic uses as a way

to diversify away from the petroleum sector.

However, policy focus in the past was towards crude oil until

Ministry of Solid Minerals was created in 1995.

Even so, due to funding constraints, not much progress has been

made by the ministry to exploit the large deposit of bitumen found in

four states of the federation excluding Enugu were the exploitation

was concentrated in the past.

3. The Negative Impact of the Petroleum Sub-Sector on the

Niger Delta Areas

The Niger Delta, largely made up of Rivers, Edo, Delta, Bayelsa and

Akwa-Ibom States, has had the reputation of being the heart of

petroleum development in Nigeria. In fact the impact of petroleum

on the Nigerian economy cannot be separated from the impact of the

sector on the Niger Delta and the impact of the Niger Delta on the

economy. The government, oil companies and communities have had

36
conflicts and confrontations arising from petroleum exploitation in

the Niger Delta.

However, the negative impacts which development of petroleum has

had on the Niger Delta can be summarized as follows:

Oil population which endangers the plant and animal lives

especially in swampy areas and wetlands.

Gas flaring which makes life uncomfortable at night and

causes excessive heat in areas near the flare.

Inadequate compensation for the destruction of economic

crops especially when corrupt officials prevent the

compensation from reaching the target communities and

individuals.

Unfair share from revenue allocation, particularly the

revenue that came largely from petroleum development.

Marginalization in the development process, poor

infrastructure in the form of roads, electricity, pipe-borne

water particularly in non-urban areas.

37
Limited employment of Niger Delta Citizens in the activities

of petroleum companies and government, petroleum related

projects, like refineries and petrochemical complexes.

Low level of stake holding in all aspects of petroleum

development from exploration to marketing. Loses in lives

and property from violence, from unrest in the Niger Delta.

The above negative impacts are normally listed by the people in the

Niger Delta. The government and oil companies do not always agree

with the allegations. Government over the years has set up panels

and commissions to look into the companies of the Niger Delta and

even set up the organizations like Oil and Mineral Producing Areas

Development Commission (OMPADEC), the Clean Nigeria

Association (CAN), the NigerDelta Development Commission (NDDC)

among others to tackle some problems identified by the people.

It is the poor implementation of the recommendations to improve the

lots of the Niger Delta people rather than the policy that has caused

the negative impact of petroleum development on the economy of the

Niger Delta in particular and that of Nigeria in general.

38
4. Downstream Problems

The production of petroleum products and their distribution are at

the root of energy crises in Nigeria beside the erratic electricity

generation and transmission. Nigeria has four refineries of combined

capacity utilization of 445,000 barrels per day but they operate

below 57% capacity due to corrupt management, poor maintenance,

vandalisation activities, strikes by workers and disruption by irate

youths of some communities. Moreover, downstream is public sector

dominated and riddled with inefficiency, poor funding and low

commitment.

2.3.2 The Positive Impact of Petroleum Sub-sector on the

Economy

This review on the effects of oil will not be complete without

mentioning some of its positive impacts on the economy.

Abolaji (1986:3),pointed out that the best way to assess the positive

impact of petroleum (crude oil) on Nigerian economy is to imagine

Nigeria without crude oil. This would imply that such contribution to

gross domestic product, revenue employment, foreign investment,

39
transfer of technology, returns on investment, balance of payments

etc. would have to come elsewhere.

1. Contribution to Gross Domestic Product

Since 1970, the total revenue of government has been predicted on

the proportion coming from the petroleum sector. This proportion

ranges from 62.4 to 79.8% from 1990-2004.

The extent of realizing this contribution of the petroleum sector has

been dictated by price of oil in the world market, the exchange rate,

the rate of inflation and capacity of Nigeria to meet its share in crude

oil market. Since 1985, the petroleum sector has accounted for an

average of 14% of the gross domestic product in real terms. Thus, it

is easy to predict the level of Nigerias GDP from the revenue from

petroleum sector.

2. Revenue Generation and Utilization

Petroleum revenue comes from petroleum profit taxes, royalty, direct

crude sales by NNPC, penalty for gas flaring and rents. Non-oil

revenue comes from government revenue from its assets, value

added tax, customs and excise tax, company income tax and others

including petroleum special trust fund and accretion to reserves.

40
The impact of government revenue is the support of government

expenditures, composed of recurrent expenses (foreign and domestic

interest payments and other non-debt payment) and capital

expenses (foreign, domestic and non-debt). Any surplus of revenue

over expenditure is used to finance foreign and domestics debts.

Domestic debt include those owed to banking and non-bank

financial institutions and other funds such as net deductions for

loans made to State, Local governments and Parastatals. Over 50%

of debt, owed to the Central Bank of Nigeria. Total domestic debt

was 11.5% and 18.9% of nominal gross domestic product in 1997

and 1998 respectively.

Currently, Nigerias external debts is put out $30.99 billion, made

up of 81.9% to Paris club, 9.6% to London club, 3.8% promissory

notes and 4.7% to non-Paris club bilateral creditors. Debt services,

compromising of principle repayment and other charges is rather

high and gets higher as the country delays in making payments on

schedule or engages in re-scheduling and refinancing. Thus, the

revenue from petroleum is used to meet several governmentsdebt

obligations among others.

41
3. Employment Generation

The petroleum industry is capital technology and skill intensive,

hence it is not considered labour intensive like agriculture, trade

and commerce or manufacturing. However, given the multiplicity of

activities from exploration to marketing, labour requirement for the

petroleum industry including workers in petroleum ministry and

parastatals could be substantial. Labour force in the industry

includes executives and professionals in oil and gas companies,

senior staff, junior staff, service contractors and part time day-job

workers. Both NNPC and oil companies provide professionals and

intermediate technical level training for their workers.

The petroleum industry has produce engineers for various petroleum

operations, geologists, geophysicists, top level administrators who

current provide their services to the industry. NNPC and companies

also provide employment to people from the communities where they

operate, although occasionally some communities complain of

marginalization on the employment of their youths especially restive

ones.

42
To improve the quantity of labour in the petroleum industries, oil

companies offer scholarships to students entering tertiary

institutions to study petroleum and petrochemical engineering,

geology, physics, mathematics, finance, administration and related

subjects. The preponderance of these scholarships goes to student

from the areas where the companies operate, particularly the Niger

Delta. The Petroleum Training Institution Efurum was established in

1973 and it has since trained several technical and intermediate

staff working in NNPC and oil companies. A center for petroleum

studies is being set up in Kaduna for offering courses that will

enhance the knowledge of people interested in the petroleum

industry.

4. Foreign investment

The activities of multinationals in the petroleum sector, Shell, Mobil,

Chevron, Agip, Elf, Texaco involve inflow of foreign investment in the

form of expertise, plant and equipment used in the petroleum

industry, inflow of funds and finance for meeting expenses.

Investments in industrial core projects that use petroleum as inputs

fertilizers, aluminum, cement and steel plants.

43
In the 1970s the oil boom affected the pattern of investment.

Foreigners were falling over each other to lend to Nigeria. According

to one assessment, the oil boom allowed the public sector to become

the prime mover of the economy through investment of the growing

oil revenue in social, physical and economic infrastructure.

These include huge and expensive manufacturing projects such as

steel mills and papers rolling mills considered by many today as

drain pines. Besides, government investment activities were largely

urban based resulting in the focus of economic activities shifting

sharply to construction commerce and service sectors.

In the mid 1980s crude oil projects suffered capacity under-

utilization due to lack of funds for maintenance and purchase of

spare parts. In the 1990s government took some bold steps to make

the country investment friendly. These steps included the

promulgation of the Nigerian Investment Promotion Decree of 1995

and the Foreign Exchange (Monitoring and Miscellaneous

Provisions) Decree 17, of 1995. In addition government set out to

privatize several public sector enterprises especially in the power

and petroleum sectors.

44
In the petroleum sector there are several investment opportunities

some of which have already attracted significant foreign

investments. These include:

Improvement in the reserve additions which ensures the

investor profit margin of $2.30 a barrel.

Service contracts to provide specialized services like seismic

surveys, data acquisition, processions and interpretation,

wire logging and core analysis.

Bitumen development, pipeline development for natural gas

projects.

Acquisition of routing for bulk liquefied petroleum gas

transportation.

Production fabrication and project financing for

petrochemical industry

Compressed natural gas cylinder manufacturing

Refining, distribution and marketing of petroleum products

and crude oil transportation by Nigeria flagged ocean going

vessels now dominated by foreign vessels.

45
5. International Trade

No other sector of the economy has brought the gains from

international trade to Nigeria since 1975 more than the petroleum

industry.

The sector accounted for 85.6 to 97.7% of total value of exports

between 1975 and 1999. This means that non-petroleum exports

could manage 2.3 to 14.4% of total export during the same period.

The destination of Nigerias trade in petroleum is principally the

United States and Western Europe which accounted for 49.3% and

20.1% of the total in 1998. Nigerias membership and active

participation in the Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries

(OPEC) is due to the petroleum sector. Nigeria accounts for 7 to 8%

of total OPEC crude oil production and 3.2% of total OPEC proven

crude oil reserves. In accounts for a significant proportion of OPEC

gas reserves having recently joined the club of liquefied natural gas

exporters. Nigeria has the potential to play a major role in

international energy-petroleum issues, but optimal harnessing of the

potential is the question.

46
6. Balance of Payment

A countrys position in terms of favourable or unfavourable balance

of payment determines its strength in international trade with any

other country and with the rest of the world. The principal

contribution of increase in revenue from crude oil is to improve the

countrys balance of payment positions.

The impact of foreign exchange proceeds from the petroleum sector

is traceable to foreign exchange that accrues to economy vis-a-vis to

oil companies. Oil companies are allowed to keep the foreign

exchange earned from crude oil and only to bring back to Nigeria the

portion necessary to pay for local expenses. It was only recently that

non oil exporters were allowed to keep foreign exchange earned from

exports and repatriate some to Nigeria via domiciliary accounts. The

financial arrangements between the government and oil companies

had placed the government at a disadvantage because it appeared

that foreign exchange earnings are not maximized. This statement

was made as far back as 1973. It appears to be still true judging by

the receipts coming to government by ways of unstable petroleum

profit tax, royalties and penalty from gas flaring.

47
Overall, however it is the foreign exchange earning from oil and non-

oil sectors that enhance Nigerias balance of payment. Surpluses in

balance of payment are associated with those years when crude oil

prices were high and increasing. The reverse is true of those years

when there were deficits and low oil prices especially when non-oil

exports were not substantial.Balance of payments is recorded in

current, capital and services accounts.

Over the years, especially in periods of high crude oil prices, the

surplus in current account of oil sector is used to moderate the

deficit in non-oil sector. The result is a swing from balance of

payment deficit to surplus. Available statistics since 1990 shows

balance of trade was in surplus except for the year 1998 when crude

oil prices fell to as low as $10,00 a barrel.

The best suggestion for the future is to minimize the negative

impacts through credible policy reform and judicious

implementation of policy measures for example, the development of

the Niger delta and other sectors of the development of the Niger

Delta and other sectors of the economy. In addition the positive

48
contribution should be maximized also through enlightened policy

reforms.

2.4 IMPACT OF OVERDEPENDENCE OF BUDGET ON OIL

REVENUE

According to the Statistical Bulletin of the Federal Bureau of

Statistics, over 80% of total federally collectable revenue is expected

every year from oil sector. In addition large proportions of estimated

budget deficit are always financed from excess crude oil revenue. In

a situation where government expenditure depends solely on a

revenue derived from a resources with a volatile price, the objectives

of the budget may not be fully realized if prices fall.

For instance, the budget of 2000 which was the firstfull budget to be

formulated and implemented by the civilian administration in

Nigerias third republic, which the initial conditions of the budget

were one, in which the external front, the economy was

characterized by the notorious and lingering problems of high

external debts overhang, heavy import dependence, high export

49
concentration in favour of petroleum oil, and the related problem of

low level of non-oil export competiveness.

On the domestic front, economic growth was still stunted as the

Gross Domestic Product (GDP) grew at the rate of 2.7%, both the

private sector and the industrial base were weak, agricultural

productivity remained low, the incidence of poverty was

outrageously high, at more than 60% of the population, the rate of

unemployment was yet to abate, but inflationary pressures had been

successfully contained as the rate of inflation was about 6.6% at the

end of 1999. All this shows that the performance of the Nigerian

economy was lackluster and needed to be salvaged, it was on this

basis that 2000 budget was drawn. But the government failed to

achieve the aim of this budget due to overdependence on oil revenue

and poor implementation.

So in this case, there is a dire need for a fundamental restructuring

of the economy away from the petroleum sector, good governance is

the only condition for economic recovery and development, and the

economy should remain open within the frame work of globalization

and liberalization of trade and exchange.

50
2.5 THE NEED FOR INDEPENDENT REVENUE MOBILIZATION

FOR NIGERIAN ECONOMY

Independent revenue is defined as revenue accruable to federal,

state or local government other than revenue paid into the

Federation Account. This literature review will attempt to examine

what proportion of revenue collected by the federal, state and local

government is derived from independent sources and how the three

tiers of government can enhancetheir development programmes

instead of depending solely on oil revenue.

In a federal system of government, financial relation shop among the

different tiers of government, as pointed out by Olaku (1979) in the

most if not alI federal countries, one of the most constant sources of

inter-governmental wrangles center on the part of the lower levels of

government to discharge essential political and constitutional

responsibilities, thus in the case of Nigeria, almost all regimes from

colonial period to the present have been facing the problem of how to

distribute revenue from Federation Account among the different

levels of government to the satisfaction of all concerned.

51
According to the report of the political bureau (1987) as many as

thirteen different attempt have been made at devising an acceptable

revenue allocation formular (for the country) each of which is more

remembered for controversies it generated than issues settled.

Perhaps the contentions, conflicts and controversies generated by

revenue allocation would have been minimized if the different tiers of

governments had adequately mobilized all the sources of internal

revenue available to them. An examination of the years for which

figures are available on the mobilization of independent sources of

revenue by the different levels of government has revealed that very

little efforts have been made to mobilize revenue internally.

The Federal Government independent revenue accounted for a very

insignificant part of the non-oil revenue.

The major sources of internal revenue available to the Federal

Government include Company Income Tax, which is levied on profit

of companies, Capital Gain Tax and Personal Income Tax from

Armed Forces, Police and Foreign Affairs.

52
2.5.1 State Government and Internal Revenue Mobilization

The sources of independent revenue available to state governments

include personal income tax, motor vehicle license, educational

development tax, school fees, fees derived from pools promoters,

property tax, registration of business, premises, economic

development levy paid by business concerns in the states, company

tax, sales of agricultural produce, etc. In order to generate enough

revenue through independent sources, it is necessary for the state

government to establish tax offices not only in local government

areas but also at clan ward and village levels. Popoola (1993:9).

2.5.2 Local Government Revenue Mobilization

According to Popoola (1993:9), the situation regarding local

government revenue is not different from what is obtainable in the

states. Prior to the 1979 local government reforms, which made

provision for local governments to have allocation from Federation

Accounts, Local Governments used to derive a great part of their

revenue from independent sources. However, after 1976 reforms

53
almost all the local governments in the country become complacent

and depended almost entirely of Federal allocation.

The above situation where the Federal, State and Local Government

depend entirely on the revenue from Federation Account a great part

of which comes from oil and customs and excise revenue is

dangerous.

Oil is not an inexhaustible source of revenue and it is not good to

depend on a commodity whose price fluctuates depending on events

in the other parts of the world.

Moreover, Nigeria membership of many international trade

organizations may in future reduce her revenue from Customs and

Excise Duties. Efforts must therefore be made to tap the various

sources of internal revenue available to the Federal, State and Local

Governments as we have examined.

Finally, revenue collection is a national service, which calls for

dedication, honesty, patriotism and hard work.

One controversial issue in the mobilization of internal sources of

revenue by the various tiers of government is that the contractors

are better equipped to collect revenue for them. It is doubtful

54
whether these contractors have performed better than state and

local government employees since the introduction of the

contractors.

Moreover, the use of the contractors is illegal since the constitution

grants the powers of revenue collection to the different levels of

government and not to the contractors.

It is recommended that State and Local governments should train,

motivate and equip their personnel properly for tax collection and

stop depending on federal government allocation from oil revenue.

2.6 CHALLENGES IN THE OIL SECTOR

Ezeagu (1979:9), pointed out that the oil sector has been plagued by

various problems which undermined its optimal development over

the years.

In general terms, the oil sector of the Nigerian economy in the 1990s

faced (and still faces some of) the following problems.

1. Public control and Bureaucracy

The Nigerian National Petroleum Corporation (NNPC) is controlled by

the Ministry of Petroleum Resources. It lacks autonomy, as a result

55
of which decision taking is often bureaucratic and unnecessarily

delayed. Therefore, the operation of the NNPC is characterized by

inefficiency, especially in refinery operations, distribution and

marketing.

2. Poor Funding of Investments

Frequent delays in the payment of cash calls to the joint venture

operators have tended to discourage increase in the level of

investment by the oil companies. Insufficiency of funds has also

constrained adequateequipment maintenance and efficient refinery

operations by the NNPC. The Federal Governments delays in the

paymentof cash calls for its JV operations in the upstream sub-

sector, focusing more on maintenance rather than growth.

3. Communal Disturbances

There had been frequent communal disturbances which disrupts

crude production as oil communities clamour for higher stake in oil

operations.

4. Smuggling and Diversion of Petroleum Products

There are reported cases of massive smuggling of petroleum

products across the borders in quest for foreign exchange and to

56
take undue advantage of the lower domestic prices vis--vis

neighbouring countries prices.

5. Fraudulent Domestic Marketing Practices

Some marketers hoard products in periods of scarcity in order to sell

in the black market at higher prices.

6. Products Adulteration

This is encouraged largely by price differential of some products and

the proliferation of illegal sales outlets where some adulterations

occur.

2.7 ATTEMPTS MADE BY GOVERNMENT TO IMPROVE NON-OIL

SECTORS

According to Ezeagu (1993:99), the government has made different

attempts to improve the non-oil sector such as the Green Revolution

(GR), Operation Feed the Nation (OFN), Structural Adjustment

Programme (SAP) and Family Support Programme (FSP).

In consonance with this, Emekekwe (1997:504) added that Nigeria

Export and Import Bank (NEXIM) is also one of the attempt

measures taken to improve non-oil sector. It was meant to support

57
farmers and other small scale exporters to have direct access to

international market. Other attempts introduced by government to

improve the non-oil sector are the protection of domestic industries

against unfair competition from imports and dumping enhancement

of capacity utilization in agriculture, manufacturing and mining

industries, economic empowerment of both rural and urban

dwellers, and upgrading of social and economic infrastructure.

Others are the increase on budgetary allocation to the Education,

Health, Energy and Agricultural Sectors, incentive for investments in

manufacturing, agriculture and mining.

And not forgetting the greater one, which is Poverty Alleviation and

Equity, the Poverty Alleviation Programme (PAP) was launched in the

year 2000 to address the problem of high incidence of poverty in the

country. This programmewas geared towards socio-economic

empowerment of the people. Socio-economic empowerment was to

be achieved through programme targeting and direct provision of

employment opportunities.

Ezeagu (1993:107), still went ahead to maintain that all these

attempts failed due to poor implementations and mismanagement of

58
funds, by those in charge, given the poor performance of agriculture

in recent years and rapid growth of import substituting industries.

He also maintained that the manufacturing sectors have been

experiencing shortage of raw materials, and that the Operation Feed

the Nation (OFN) and its successors, have largely become conduit

pipes for wasting public funds, for they have not made any

meaningful impact on agricultural output nor to other sectors of the

economy.

2.8 THE LEVEL OF IMPORTATION OF PETROLUEM PRODUCTS

IN NIGERIA

According to newswatch magazine of 1st April 2001, federal

government decides on massive importation of petroleum products

to forestall scarcity that could be triggered by the shut down of

refineries for repairs. These may not be the best times for Nigerian

refineries. The Kaduna refinery has been shut down, barely six

months after it resumed production. Before then, both Kaduna and

Warri refineries had suffered inactivity for two years, following the

59
blow up of Chanomi Creek pipeline, which is a feeder pipeline to the

two refineries.

Consequently, the refining capacity would be below expectation. The

nations refining capacity had fallen below 30 percent. At full

capacity, all the refineries can refine 445,000 barrels of petroleum

products daily. But Nigerias petrol need is said to be about 30

million litres per day, and has been projected to hit 40 million litres

in a few years time. Before February 2006, Nigeria was spending

between $3million and $5million daily on importation of petroleum

products. With the almost non-production of petroleum products in

the country, the federal government has decided to import, to

forestall scarcity.

Ajuonuma, group general manger, public affairs of the Nigerian

National Petroleum Corporation, NNPC, said that fears of any

scarcity were erroneous, because the federal government has put in

place a comprehensive plan to increase the level of products, so as

to meet local consumption need.

Ogun, President and Natural Gas Senior Staff Association of Nigeria,

PENGASSAN, said that the federal government has no reason to

60
import fuel given the status of Nigeria as an oil producing country.

It does not make sense that we have oil and yet import the same

product from abroad. It tells us the need to have more refineries,

especially private ones, because the earlier it is for us to stop

importation, the better for this country, he added that to guard

against further importation of petroleum products, the major oil

companies should be given a mandate to construct refineries within

a time frame or be made to face sanctions.

Korodo, Zonal Secretary National Union of Petroleum and Natural

Gas Workers said There is an urgent need for the government to

allow private sector to run the plants because the situation at

present shows that government is not competent to mange the

refineries efficiently, he said, adding, with that situation right now,

it means government would spend over $5million on daily

importation of petroleum products to meet domestic demands.

Nigeria regarded as one of the major exporters of crude oil in the

world, does not have functional refineries, but depends totally on

importation of petroleum products for domestic consumption.

61
2.9 FACTORS THAT COULD MINIMIZE NIGERIAS

OVERDEPENDENCE ON OIL REVENUE

Abayomi (2006),stated that it is necessary that a number of factors

should be considered if success is to be achieved in a bid to diversify

revenue. The factors are:

1. Agriculture

Agriculture used to be the mainstay of the Nigerian economy which

plays a vital role in shaping the economic and political destiny of the

country. Agriculture has been the foundation of industrialization

throughout the world because without agriculture, there would have

been no industrial revolution in the first place. Agriculture provided

the raw materials for the manufacturing industries. The industries,

in turn, fuelled the expansion of agriculture to meet their raw

materials needs and the food needs in industrialized nations.

A report of the economic survey of Nigeria conducted in 1959 at the

instance of the Federal Government, showed that we earned 95.4

million pounds from yam exports and 86.1 million pounds from the

export of cassava and garri. On the other hand, only 30 million

pounds& 25 million pounds came from agriculture and cocoa

62
respectively. A recent report released by the Food and Agriculture

Organisation, FAO, of the United Nations showed that in 2008,

Nigeria earned N56 billion naira from yam export. Nigeria is

regarded as one of the biggest poultry producer in Africa, corporate

poultry as increased from 40 million birds annually to about 70

million.

Agriculture is said to be a surer and more lasting source of revenue

and a mighty grass root empowerment tool while our oil revenue is

applied to complement agricultural & other viable sources of

revenue (Isah, 2009).

2. Tourism

Tourism is also a factor thatcan aid less reliance on oil revenue for

economic development and also a source of revenue for the country.

The reality on ground is that tourism has become one of the most

important global industries of today. With the increasing ease of

travel and smoothness of movement across international boundaries

the Nigeria tourism sector boasts of being one of the worlds biggest

export earner generating enormous foreign exchange earnings and

employment. It is no longer in doubt that tourism has become a

63
catalyst for growth in Nigeria and in many countries like Australia,

Cyprus, Kenya, etc, as it brings in substantial revenues for

governments whilst stimulating greater investments in

infrastructure which ultimately contributes to improved living

conditions for the people.

Between the years 2000-2006, tourism was the second largest

foreign exchange earner after manufacturing for the Malaysian

Government. 2006 saw a 6.8% growth rate in tourist arrivals in

Malaysia with a 13.5% increase in receipts. In terms of employment,

it is estimated that this industry accounts for remarkable 1,344,000

jobs of which 492,320 are direct employment.

Nigeria and indeed Africa is well known for their more than the

usual hospitality. The traditional Nigerian society dwells richly in

welcoming guests, strangers and visitors using various approaches

and means. Locations such as beaches ideal for different kinds of

games, unique wildlife, vast strips of unspoiled nature ranging from

tropical forest, magnificent waterfalls and great artworks showcasing

lifestyle and creativity of the Nigerian people.

64
Some of these natural locations, sights and sounds of the people

have been developed into tourism sites widely sought after by local

and foreign tourists.

The tourists sites which have attracted good number of visitors

include Obudu Cattle Ranch in Calabar, Mambilla Plateau in Taraba

State, Yankari Game Reserve in Bauchi State, Oguta Lake in Imo

State, Lagos Sunburn Yatch Hotel. Beautiful festivals include, the

OsunOsogbo Festival, The Argungu Fishing Festival, Ine Festival in

Delta State, and the Iwa-Akwa Festivals in Imo State.

Ward (2008), an experienced hospitality consultant, and currently

the award winner of African Investors 2008 Tourism Investor

Adviser of the year in one of his article positioned that tourism is a

potential growth sector and a source of revenue for Nigeria.

(Ogene.wordpress.com/2009/02/04/vision-20-2020-developing-

sustainable-tourism).

3. Taxation

Taxation is a tool for economic growth and has been proven to be a

veritable source of revenue for sustenance of most economies,

including Nigeria. Nigeria derives its budgetary revenue from

65
taxation primarily from petroleum profit taxation, import and excise

duties, and mining rents and royalties. Petroleum taxation accounts

for 65 percent of the budgetary revenues. As of May 2000 the tax

rate for assessable petroleum profit was 85 percent. In March 1995,

the government established a new tariff structure levying taxes on

imported goods, ranging from 5 to 60 percent. Import tax is non-

preferential and applies equally to all countries. Import duties are

either specific or advalorem (value-added tax, VAT) depending on the

commodity. In 2000 the VAT rate was 5 percent.

Other sources of revenue from taxation include companies income

tax (30 percent of assessable profit), capital gains tax (10 percent of

capital gains), various types of licenses, and personal income tax.

Employees pay as they earn. Such taxes are deducted at monthly

pay periods by employers for the federal treasury.

(www.nationsencyclopedia.com/2009/economicsandtaxation).

In 2000 the tax rate varied from 5 to 25 percent of cumulative or

total taxable income. The government sought to collect the taxes by

introducing tax clearance certificates. Individuals had to produce

such certificates proving that they had paid their taxes, before

66
receiving government benefits, holding public office, or receiving

passports for foreign travel.

Many countries around the world have built their economies mainly

on a well organized tax system & these economies have succeeded

without any natural resources.

4. Solid Minerals

Sustainable development of the solid minerals sector has been

identified as fundamental to the diversification of the nations

economic dependence on oil and gas. President Yaradua noted

hatthe Ministry of Mines and Steel Development have embarked on

coal to power project and also the development of the nations

bitumen resources through competitive bidding as provided for

under the Nigeria Minerals and Mining Act 2007 stressing that

eleven strategic coal clusters have been identified across the country

to generate electricity of at least 600 mega watts over the next 20 to

30 months and beyond under the Independent Power Project to

ensure that operators with the financial & technical ability are

attracted to the sector.

(www.mmsd.gov.ng/Newsletter/solid_minetrals)Dev_Key.asp)

67
REFERENCES

Abayomi, Y.O. (2006), Revenue Diversification, C.B.N. Bullion: Vol.


2(3).

Abolaji, M.E. (1986), The Role of Banking Sector in Agricultural


Financing. C.B.N. Bullion: 3(13).

Adenikinju, A.F. (1998), Productivity Growth and Energy


Consumption in Nigeria Manufacturing Sector.A Panel Data
Analysis Energy Policy 26(3).

Alade, S.O. (2001), Analysis of the Year 2001 Federal Government


Budget. C.B.N Bullion: 25(1).

Anyanwu, J.C. et al: (1997), Structure of Nigeria Economy.


Onitsha:Hybrid Publication.

Chinemelu, C.A. (1994), Macro Economic Concept and Applications.


Onitsha: Published by Communication Ltd.

Emekekwue, P. (1977), Corporate Financial Management (3rd


Edition), Zaria, A Publication of Base/OAU.

Ikem, A.A. (1990), The Impact of Oil on a Developing Country: The


Case of Nigeria. New York: Praeger Publishers.

Maclean, M. (1958), Concentration of Export and Import


Comparison. Economic Journal: Vol. 68(60) Lagos: Nigeria
Economic Society Publication.

Popoola, S.A. (1993), Nigeria Energy Resources Endowment and


Principles of Revenue Allocation.Energy Policy Agenda for
Nigeria. Ibadan: Evans Brothers Publication Ltd.

68
Ugwuanyi, W. (1999), Agricultural Financial Management and Food
Marketing (1st Edition), Lagos: John Kens and Willy
Publication Ltd.
Isah. (2009), www.leadershipnigeria.com)

Obasi, S. (2008), Newswatch Magazine Respondent


www.newswatchngr.com

Ogene.wordpress.com/2009/02/04/vision-20-2020-developing-
sustainable-tourism.

www.mmsd.gov.ng/newsletter/solid_minerals_dev_key_key.asp.

www.nationsencyclopedia.com/2009/economicsandtaxation.

69
CHAPTER THREE

RESEARCH METHODOLOGY

The aim of this chapter is to discuss the methods and procedures

adopted by the researcher in carrying out the research work. The

chapter contains sources of data, population and sample size

determination, description of research instrument, data analysis

techniques, validity of the research instrument and reliability of the

research instruments.

3.1 SOURCES OF DATA

The sources of data for this study include:

a. Primary source

b. Secondary source

Primary Source of Data

These are first hand information. The primary data collected are

from personal interview and questionnaire.

Copies of the questionnaire were given to the staff of Federal

Ministry of Finance, Abuja.

70
Secondary Source of Data

Secondary data are facts that the researcher collected from already

existing sources. The secondary sources from which data is

generated are text books, journals, newspapers, magazines, lecture

notes and articles.

3.2 POPULATION AND SAMPLE SIZE DETERMINATION

The staff strength of Federal Ministry of Finance, Abuja stand at

640. Based on the population of Federal Ministry of Finance, Abuja

the sample size was determined at 5% error tolerance and 95%

degree of confidence, using the Yamane formular:

n = N
1 + Ne2

Where:

n = The relevant population size.

N = Total number of staff.

e = Sampling error (5%)

71
From the study, the sample size is computed as

n =

= 399.3

3.3 DESCRIPTION OF RESEARCH INSTRUMENT

The following instruments were used to collect data for this research

work.

1. Questionnaire.

2. Interview.

QUESTIONNAIRE

This is a set of questions designed to help the researcher get the

necessary information needed for the study. The questionnaire

72
contains seventeen questions (17) consisting of multiple choice

questions and open ended questions.

INTERVIEW

Key staff of the organization were interviewed orally. The response

from the interview were used to complement the questionnaire.

3.4 DATA ANALYSIS TECHNIQUES

The data collected was subjected to simple statistical treatment.

Firstly, they were organized and presented in tables. Also, Chi-

square X2 statistical test method was used to test the hypotheses.

The formular for Chi-square is given as:

Where X2 = Chi-square

0 = The Observed frequency.

E = Corresponding Expected Frequency.

K = Level of significance.
73
= Degree of freedom.

= Summation sign.

The Chi-Square Test (X2)

X2 test provides the basic for testing whether more than one

population may be considered equal. X2 provides a means of

comparing a set of observed frequencies with a set of expected

frequencies. The calculated X2 will be compared with the critical

value of the X2. The difference will form the basis for accepting or

rejecting the null hypothesis.

Decision Rule

The rule is to reject the (Ho) null hypothesis if the calculated X2 is

greater than the critical value of X2, otherwise do not reject. This

means that if the (Ho) null hypothesis is rejected, the alternative

hypothesis (H1) will be accepted.

74
3.5 VALIDITY OF THE RESEARCH INSTRUMENT

To ensure that the research instruments applied in the work are

valid, the researcher ensured that the instruments measure the

concepts they are supposed to measure. The questionnaire was

properly structured and a pre-test was conducted on every question

contained in the questionnaire to ensure that they are valid. Also,

the design of the questionnaire was made easy for the respondents

to tick their preferred choice from the options provided. Response

validity was obtained by re-contacting the individuals whose

responses appear unusual or inconsistent.

3.6 RELIABILITY OF THE RESEARCH INSTRUMENT

A reliability test was also conducted on the instrument to determine

how consistent the responses are. Reliability is defined as the degree

to which similar outcomes are produced by a measuring instrument

when used in different situations. Onwumere (2009:68).

The researcher utilized the test/retest method of reliability testing

whereby the questionnaire was administered at two different times

to the same group of respondents. A time lag of 3 weeks was allowed

75
to ensure that the respondents do not have their earlier responses in

memory.

A correlation of the two sets of observations was conducted and it

reveals a high degree of association which indicates that the

measure is very reliable.

76
REFERENCES

Akuezuilo, E.O. (1993), Research Methodology and Statistics.


Awka: NuelCenti Publication Ltd.

Nwabuokei, P.O. (2001), Fundamentals of Statistics.


Enugu: Koruma Publication Ltd.

Onuh, MO. (1998), Applied Statistical Techniques for Business and


Sciences: Owerri: CRC Publication Ltd.

Robert, G.O. (1996), Principles and Procedures of Statistics. New


York: McGraw Hill Book Publishing Company.

Tinuke, L.J. and Adami, S.O. (1985), Statistics for Beginners.


Ibadan: Evans Brothers Publishers Ltd.

77
CHAPTER FOUR

DATA PRESENTATION, ANALYSIS AND INTERPRETATION

4.0 INTRODUCTION

This chapter is aimed at presenting, analyzing and interpreting the

responses obtained from the questionnaire administered.

TABLE 1:

4.1 QUESTIONNAIRE DISTRIBUTION

Category Questionnaires Percentage Questionnaires Percentage Questionnaires Percentage

distributed distributed returned returned not returned not Returned

Management 5 1.25 5 1.25 - -

staff

Senior staff 96 24.06 94 23.56 2 0.50

Junior staff 298 74.69 288 72.18 10 2.50

Total 399 100 387 97 12 3

It was observed that out of 399 questionnaires distributed, 12

representing 3% were not returned while 387 representing 97% were

returned.

78
Table 2: Question 7

Overdependence on oil revenue has more positive impact than

negative impact on Nigerias economic development?

Option Responses Percentages (%)

Agree 183 47.29

Strongly agree 189 48.84

Disagree 8 2.06

Strongly disagree 7 1.81

Total 387 100

From the table above, 183 representing 47.29% of the respondents

indicated Agree, 189 representing 48.84% of the respondents

indicated Strongly agree, 8 representing 2.06% of the respondents

indicated Disagree, while 7 representing 1.81% of the respondents

indicated Strongly disagree.

This shows that overdependence on oil revenue has more positive

impact than negative impact on Nigerias economic development.

79
Table 3: Question 8

What are the negative impact of petroleum sub-sector on the Niger

Delta areas?

Option Responses Percentages (%)

Oil pollution 103 26.61

Gas flaring 102 26.36

Inadequate compensation for the 80 20.67

destruction of economic crops

Limited employment of Niger 102 26.36

Delta citizens in the activities of

petroleum companies.

Total 387 100

From the table above, 103 representing 26.61% of the respondents

indicated Oil pollution, 102 representing 26.36% of the respondents

indicated Gas flaring, 80 representing 20.67% of the respondents

indicated Inadequate compensation for the destruction of economic

crops, while 102 representing 26.36% of the respondents indicated

80
Limited employment of Niger Delta citizens in the activities of

petroleum companies.

This shows that the negative impact of petroleum sub-sector on the

Niger Delta areas include:

1. Oil pollution.

2. Gas flaring.

3. Inadequate compensation for the destruction of economic

crops.

4. Limited employment of Niger delta citizens in the activities of

petroleum companies.

81
Table 4: Question 9

What are the positive impact of petroleum sub-sector on Nigerias

economy?

Option Responses Percentages (%)

Contribution to Gross Domestic 109 28.17

Product

Revenue generation & utilization 97 25.06

Employment generation 88 22.74

Foreign investment 93 24.03

Total 387 100

The table above shows that 109 representing 28.17% of the

respondents indicated Contribution to Gross Domestic Product, 97

representing 25.06% of the respondents indicated Revenue

generation & utilization, 88 representing 22.74% of the respondents

indicated Employment generation, while 93 representing 24.03% of

the respondents indicated Foreign investment.

This shows that the positive impact of petroleum sub-sector on

Nigerias economy include:

82
1. Contribution to Gross Domestic Product.

2. Revenue generation & utilization.

3. Employment generation.

4. Foreign investment.

Table 5: Question 10

Do you think that Nigerias overdependence on oil revenue could be

minimized?

Option Responses Percentages (%)

Yes 377 97.4

No 10 2.68

Total 387 100

The table above shows that 377 representing 97.4% of the

respondents indicated Yes, while 10 representing 2.68% of the

respondents indicated No.

This shows thatNigerias overdependence on oil revenue could be

minimized.

83
Table 6: Question 11

What are the factors that could minimize Nigerias overdependence

on oil revenue?

Option Responses Percentages (%)

Agriculture 187 48.32

Tourism 70 18.1

Taxation 80 20.67

Solid minerals 50 12.91

Total 387 100

The table above shows that 187 representing 48.32% of the

respondents indicated Agriculture, 70 representing 18.1% of the

respondents indicated Tourism, 80 representing 20.67% of the

respondents indicated Taxation, while 50 representing 12.91% of the

respondents indicated Solid minerals.

This shows that the factors that could minimize Nigerias

overdependence on oil revenue include:

1. Agriculture.

2. Tourism.

84
3. Taxation.

4. Solid minerals.

Table 7: Question 12

Sustainable development of the solid minerals sector has been

identified as fundamental to the diversification of the nations

economic dependence on oil and gas?

Option Responses Percentages (%)

Agree 182 47.03

Strongly agree 194 50.13

Disagree 7 1.81

Strongly disagree 4 1.03

Total 387 100

The table above shows that 182 representing 47.03% of the

respondents indicated Agree, 194 representing 50.13% of the

respondents indicated Strongly agree, 7 representing 1.81% of the

85
respondents indicated Disagree, while 4 representing 1.03% of the

respondents indicated Strongly disagree.

This shows that sustainable development of the Solid minerals

sector has been identified as fundamental to the diversification of

the nations economic dependence on oil and gas.

Table 8: Question 13

Would you say that oil sector of the Nigerian economy faces some

problems?

Option Responses Percentages (%)

Yes 380 98.2

No 7 1.80

Total 387 100

From the table above, 380 representing 98.2% of the respondents

indicatedYes, while 7 representing 1.80% of the respondents

indicated No.

This shows that the oil sector of the Nigerian economy faces some

problems.

86
Table 9: Question 14

What are the problems faced by the Nigerian oil sector?

Option Responses Percentages (%)

Public control & bureaucracy 194 50.13

Poor funding of investments 79 20.41

Communal disturbances 64 16.54

Products adulteration 50 12.92

Total 387 100

The table above shows that 194 representing 50.13% of the

respondents indicated Public control & bureaucracy, 79

representing 20.41% of the respondents indicated Poor funding of

investments, 64 representing 16.54% of the respondents indicated

Communal disturbances, while 50 representing 12.92% indicated

Products adulteration.

This shows that the problems faced by the Nigerian oil sector

include:

1. Public control & bureaucracy.

2. Poor funding of investments.

87
3. Communal disturbances.

4. Products adulteration.

Table 10: Question 15

Federal government decides on massive importation of petroleum

products to forestall scarcity?

Option Responses Percentages (%)

Agree 183 47.29

Strongly agree 187 48.32

Disagree 9 2.33

Strongly disagree 8 2.06

Total 387 100

The table above shows that 183 representing 47.29% of the

respondents indicated Agree, 187 representing 48.32% of the

respondents indicated Strongly agree, 9 representing 2.33% of the

respondents indicated Disagree, while 8 representing 2.06% of the

respondents indicated Strongly disagree.

88
This shows that federal government decides on massive importation

of petroleum products to forestall scarcity.

Table 11: Question 16

What is the extent of importation of petroleum products in Nigeria?

Option Responses Percentages (%)

High 9 2.33

Very high 8 2.06

Low 189 48.84

Very low 181 46.77

Total 387 100

From the table above, 9 representing 2.33% of the respondents

indicatedHigh, 8 representing 2.06% of the respondents indicated

Very high, 189 representing 48.84% of the respondents indicated

Low, while 181 representing 46.77% of the respondents indicated

Very low.

This shows that the extent of importation of petroleum products in

Nigeria is low.

89
Table 12: Question 17

Nigeria regarded as one of the major exporters of crude oil in the

world, does not have functional refineries but depends totally on

importation of petroleum products for domestic consumption?

Option Responses Percentages (%)

Agree 182 47.03

Strongly agree 190 49.10

Disagree 8 2.06

Strongly disagree 7 1.81

Total 387 100

The table above shows that 182 representing 47.03% of the

respondents indicated Agree, 190 representing 49.10% of the

respondents indicated Strongly agree, 8 representing 2.06% of the

respondents indicated Disagree, while 7 representing 1.81% of the

respondents indicated Strongly disagree.

This shows that Nigeria regarded as one of the major exporters of

crude oil in the world, does not have functionalrefineries but

90
depends totally on importation of petroleum products for domestic

consumption.

4.2 Hypothesis Testing

In this section, the hypothesis associated with the study will be

tested. The data already presented in this chapter will be used in

testing the hypothesis.

Hypothesis 1

Ho: Overdependence on oil revenue has more negative impact than

positive impact on Nigerias economic development.

H1: Overdependence on oil revenue has more positive impact than

negative impact on Nigerias economic development.

91
TABLE 2: QUESTION 7

Overdependence on oil revenue has more positive impact than

negative impact on Nigerias economic development?

Option Responses Percentages (%)

Agree 183 47.29

Strongly agree 189 48.84

Disagree 8 2.06

Strongly disagree 7 1.81

Total 387 100

Tools of computation

Using Chi-square X2 = (Fo Fe)2


Fe

Where;

Fo = Observed frequency

Fe = Expected frequency

= Summation sign

Level of significance = 0.05 or 5%

Degree of freedom = (Row 1) (Column 1)

92
= (4 -1) (2 1)

= (3) (1)

= 3

At 1 degree of freedom, 0.05 level of significance

X2 = 7.815

Decision Rule:

The null hypothesis (Ho) will be rejected if the computed X2o, is

greater than the critical value X2. i.e. if X2o > X2. If the critical value

of X2 is greater than the computed value of X2o, the null hypothesis

(Ho) will be accepted and alternative hypothesis will be rejected.

Test of Hypothesis 1

Using X2 = (F0 Fe)2


Fe

Using Fo = Observed frequency = (183 + 189 + 8 + 7)

Fe = Expected frequency = (183 + 189 + 8 + 7)


4

= 96.75

Expected frequency = 96.75

93
Chi- square calculated equal to:

X20 = (183 96.75)2 + (189 96.75)2+ (8-96.75)2+(7-96.75)2

96.75 96.75 96.75 96.75

X20 = (86.25)2 + ( 92.25)2+ (-88.75)2 + (-89.75)2


96.75 96.75 96.75 96.75

X20 = 7439.06+ 8510.06 +7876.56 +8055.06


96.7596.75 96.75 96.75

X20 = 76.889 + 87.959 + 81.411 + 83.256

X20 = 329.515

Decision Rule:

Since calculated X20 of 329.515 is greater than the critical X2 of

7.815, the null hypothesis (Ho) is rejected. The alternative

hypothesis (H1) which states that overdependence on oil revenue has

more positive impact than negative impact on Nigerias economic

development is accepted.

94
Hypothesis 2

Ho: Agriculture, Tourism, Taxation & Solid minerals are not factors

that could minimize Nigerias overdependence on oil revenue.

H1: Agriculture, Tourism, Taxation & Solid minerals are the factors

that could minimize Nigerias overdependence on oil revenue.

Table 6: Question 11

What are the factors that could minimize Nigerias overdependence

on oil revenue?

Option Responses Percentages (%)

Agriculture 187 48.32

Tourism 70 18.1

Taxation 80 20.67

Solid minerals 50 12.91

Total 387 100

Tools of computation

Using Chi-square = X2 (Fo Fe)2


Fe

95
Where;

Fo = Observed frequency

Fe = Expected frequency

= Summation sign

Level of significance = 0.05 or 5%

Degree of freedom = (Row 1) (Column 1)

= (4 -1) (2 1)

= (3) (1)

= 3

At 3 degree of freedom, 0.05 level of significance

X2 = 7.815

Decision Rule:

The null hypothesis (Ho) will be rejected if the computed X20, is

greater than the critical value X2.i.e. if X20> X2. If the critical value of

X2 is greater than the computed value of X20, the null hypothesis

(Ho) will be accepted and the alternative hypothesis rejected.

96
Test of Hypothesis 2

Using X2 = (Fo Fe)2


Fe

Using Fo = Observed frequency = (187 + 70 + 80 + 50)

Fe = Expected frequency = (187 + 70 + 80 + 50)


4

= 96.75

Expected frequency = 96.75

Chi-square calculated equal to:

X2o = (187-96.75)2 + (70-96.75)2 + (80-96.75)2 + (50 96.75)2


96.75 96.75 96.75 96.75

X2o = (90.25)2 + (-26.75)2 + (-16.75)2 + (-46.75)2


96.75 96.75 96.75 96.75

X2o = 8145.06 + 715.56 + 280.56 + 2185.56


96.75 96.75 96.75 96.75

X2o = 84.18 + 7.395 + 2.899 + 22.58

X2o = 117.054

97
Decision Rule:

Since the calculated X2o of 117.054 is greater than the critical X2 of

7.815, the null hypothesis (Ho) is rejected. The alternative

hypothesis (H1) which states that Agriculture, Tourism, Taxation and

Solid minerals are the factors that could minimize Nigerias

overdependence on oil revenue is accepted.

Hypothesis 3

Ho: The level of importation of petroleum products in Nigeria is

high.

H1: The level of importation of petroleum products in Nigeria is low.

Table 11: Question 16

What is the extent of importation of petroleum products in Nigeria?

Option Responses Percentages (%)

High 9 2.33

Very high 8 2.06

Low 189 48.84

Very low 181 46.77

Total 387 100

98
Tools of computation

Using Chi-square X2 = (Fo Fe)2


Fe

Where;

Fo = Observed frequency

Fe = Expected frequency

= Summation sign

Level of significance = 0.05 or 5%

Degree of freedom = (Row 1) (Column 1)

= (4 1) (2 1)

= (3) (1)

= 3

At 3 degree of freedom, 0.05 level of significance

X2 = 7.815

Decision Rule:

The null hypothesis (Ho) will be rejected if the computed X2o, is

greater than the critical value X2. i.e. if X2o > X2. If the critical value

99
of X2 is greater than the computed value of X2o, the null hypothesis

(Ho) will be accepted and the alternative hypothesis rejected.

Test of Hypothesis 3

Using X2 = (Fo Fe)2


Fe

Using Fo = Observed frequency = (9 + 8 + 189 + 181)

Fe = Expected frequency = (9 + 8 + 189 + 181)


4

= 96.75

Expected frequency = 96.75

Chi square calculated equal to:

X2o = (9 96.75)2 + (8 96.75)2 + (189 96.75)2 + (181 96.75)2


96.75 96.75 96.75 96.75

X2o = (-87.75)2 + (-88.75)2 + (92.25)2 + (84.25)2


96.75 96.75 96.75 96.75

X2o = 7700.06 + 7876.56 + 8510.06 + 7098.06


96.75 96.75 96.75 96.75

X2o = 79.59 + 81.41 + 87.96 + 73.36

100
X2o = 322.32

Decision Rule:

Since the calculated X2o of 322.32 is greater than the critical X2 of

7.815, the null hypothesis (Ho) is rejected. The alternative

hypothesis (H1) which states that the level of importation of

petroleum products in Nigeria is low is accepted.

Hypothesis 4

Ho: Poor funding of investments, Communal disturbances,

Smuggling & diversion of petroleum products & Products

adulteration are not problems encountered by the Nigerian oil

sector.

H1: Poor funding of investments, Communal disturbances,

Smuggling & diversion of petroleum products & Products

adulteration are the problems encountered by the Nigerian oil

sector.

101
Table 9: Question 14

What are the problems encountered by the Nigerian oil sector?

Option Responses Percentages (%)

Public control & bureaucracy 194 50.13

Poor funding of investments 79 20.41

Communal disturbances 64 16.54

Products adulteration 50 12.92

Total 387 100

Tools of computation

Using Chi-square X2 = (Fo Fe)2


Fe

Where;

Fo = Observed frequency

Fe = Expected frequency

= Summation sign

Level of significance = 0.05 or 5%

Degree of freedom = (Row 1) (Column 1)

= (4 1) (2 1)

102
= (3) (1)

= 3

At 3 degree of freedom, 0.05 level of significance

X2 = 7.815

Decision Rule:

The null hypothesis (Ho) will be rejected if the computed X2o, is

greater than the critical value X2. i.e. if X2o > X2. If the critical value

of X2 is greater than the computed value of X2o, the null hypothesis

(Ho) will be accepted and the alternative hypothesis rejected.

Test of Hypothesis 4

Using X2 = (Fo Fe)2


Fe

Using Fo = Observed frequency = (194 + 79 + 64 + 50)

Fe = Expected frequency = (194 + 79 + 64 + 50)


4

= 96.75

Expected frequency = 96.75

Chi square calculated equal to:

X2o = (194 96.75)2 + (79 96.75)2 + (64 96.75)2 + (50 96.75)2


96.75 96.75 96.75 96.75

103
X2o = (97.25)2 + (-17.75)2 + (-32.75)2 + (-46.75)2
96.75 96.75 96.75 96.75

X2o = 9457.56 + 315.06+ 1072.56 + 2185.56


96.75 96.75 96.75 96.75

X2o = 97.75 + 3.256 + 11.09 + 22.59

X2o = 134.69

Decision Rule:

Since the calculated X2o of 134.69 is greater than the critical value

X2 of 7.815, the null hypothesis (Ho) is rejected. The alternative

hypothesis (H1) which states that Poor funding of investment,

Communal disturbances, Smuggling & diversion of petroleum

products & Products adulteration are the problems encountered by

the Nigerian oil sector is accepted.

104
CHAPTER FIVE

SUMMARY OF FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS &

RECOMMENDATIONS

5.1 SUMMARY OF FINDINGS

The major findings of this research investigation are as follows:

1. Overdependence on oil revenue has more positive impact

than negative impact on Nigerias economic development.

2. Agriculture, Tourism, Taxation & Solid minerals are the

factors that could minimize Nigerias overdependence on

oil revenue.

3. The level of importation of petroleum products in Nigeria

is low.

4. Poor funding of investments, Communal disturbances,

Smuggling and diversion of petroleum products and

Products adulteration are the problems encountered by

the Nigerian oil sector.

105
5.2 CONCLUSIONS

Nigerian economic growth is highly depended on the oil revenue.

Hence, if there is a glut and fall in oil price in international market,

it may be a great disaster on the economy and to the citizenry of the

country.

There is no doubt that the upstream sector of the oil industry in

Nigeria is the most developed and it has attracted considerable

foreign capital inflows.

5.3 RECOMMENDATIONS

Based on the findings of this study, the following are

recommendations:

1. The Nigerian government should focus on the need for

diversification into other sources of revenue in order not to be

affected by fall of oil price in the international market.

2. The government should develop other sectors of the economy

such as agricultural sector, and industrial sector by providing

incentives such as tax concession, provision of facilities

needed by these sectors in order to boost more production.

106
3. The government should build more refineries to complement

the existing ones that will go a long way to satisfy domestic

consumption and generate more revenue for the country.

107
BIBLIOGRAPHY

Abayomi, Y.O. (1977), Revenue Diversification, C.B.N. Bullion: 2(3).

Abolaji, M.E. (1986), The Role of Banking Sector in Agricultural


Financing. C.B.N. Bullion: 3(13).

Adenikinju, A.F. (1998), Productivity Growth and Energy


Consumption in Nigeria Manufacturing Sector.A Panel Data
Analysis Energy Policy 26(3).

Akuezuilo, E.O. (1993), Research Methodology and Statistics.


Awka: NuelCenti Publication Ltd.

Alade, S.O. (2001), Analysis of the Year 2001 Federal Government


Budget. C.B.N Bullion: 25(1).

Anyanwu, J.C. et. al: (1997), Structure of Nigeria Economy.


Onitsha: Hybrid Publication.

Chinemelu, C.A. (1994), Macro Economic Concept and Applications.


Onitsha: Published by Communication Ltd.

Emekekwue, P. (1977), Corporate Financial Management (3rd


Edition), Zaria, A Publication of Base/OAU.

Ikem, A.A. (1990), The Impact of Oil on a Developing Country: The


Case of Nigeria. New York: Praeger Publishers.

Maclean, M. (1958), Concentration of Export and Import


Comparison. Economic Journal: 68(60) Lagos: Nigeria
Economic Society Publication.

Nwabuokei, P.O. (2001), Fundamentals of Statistics. Enugu:


Koruma Publication Ltd.

108
Garba, A.G. (1999), Revenue and Appraisal of the 1998 Budget,
C.B.N. Bullion: 24(1).

Gali, C.D. (1997), The Nigeria Experience in National Economic


Planning, Design Implementation and Monitoring. C.B.N.
Bullion: 4(2).

Obioma, G.O. (1987), Research Methodology. Ibadan: Heinemann


Publishers.

Onuh, O. (1998), Applied Statistical Techniques for Business and


Sciences. Owerri: CRC Publication Ltd.

Osuala, E.C (1982), Introduction to Research Methodology.


Onitsha: Africa-Feb Publication Ltd.

Obadan, M.I. (1998), Non-Oil Exports in Nigerias Changing Policy


Dispensation. NCEMA Policy Analysis Series, 4(2)

Popoola, S.A. (1993), Nigeria Energy Resources Endowment and


Principles of Revenue Allocation.Energy Policy Agenda for
Nigeria. Ibadan: Evans Brothers Publication Ltd.

Robert, G.O. (1996), Principles and Procedures of Statistics. New


York: McGraw Hill Book Publishing Company.

Tinuke, L.J. and Adami, S.O. (1985), Statistics for Beginners.


Ibadan: Evans Brothers Publishers Ltd.

Ugwuanyi, W. (1999), Agricultural Financial Management and Food


Marketing (1st Edition), Lagos: John Kens and Willy
Publication Ltd.

109
INTERNET SOURCES

Isah.(2009), www.leadershipnigeria.com).

Obasi,S.(2008),NewswatchMagazineRespondent
www.newswatchgr.com

Ogene.wordpress.com/2009/02/04/vision-20-2020-developing-
sustainable-tourism.

www.nationsencyclopedia.com/2009/economicsandtaxation.

www.mmsd.gov/newsletter/solid_minerals_Dev_Key.asp.

110
APPENDIX 1

Department of Management,
Faculty of Business Administration,
University of Nigeria,
Enugu Campus.
Dear Respondent,

I am a postgraduate student of the Department of Management,

Faculty of Business Administration, University of Nigeria, Enugu

Campus.

I am undertaking a research project on the topic: Assessing the

Impact of Overdependence on Oil Revenue to Nigeria Economy.

You are kindly requested to answer the questionnaire.

However, this research work is simply for academic purposes. Any

information supplied by you will be treated with utmost confidence.

Thanks for your co-operation.

Yours faithfully,

Ijeh,Chukwuemeka Anthony

(Project Researcher)

111
QUESTIONNAIRE

SECTION A

Please tick () in the boxes provided for the answer you consider

appropriate.

1. Sex:

A. Male [ ] B. Female [ ]

2. Age:

A. 18 25yrs [ ] B. 26 35yrs. [ ]

C. 36 45yrs [ ] D. 46yrs and above [ ]

3. What is your educational qualification?

A. WASC/GCE [ ] B. OND/NCE [ ]

C. HND/BSc [ ] D. MSc/MBA [ ]

4. How long have you been working in the organization?

A. 1 5yrs [ ] B. 6 10yrs [ ]

C. 11-15yrs [ ] D. 16 20yrs [ ]

E. 21yrs and above [ ]

5. What category do you belong in the organization?

A. Management staff [ ] B. Senior staff [ ]

C. Junior staff [ ]

112
6. What is your income grade level?

A. 01-04 [ ] B. 05 08 [ ]

C. 09 12 [ ] D. 13 16 [ ]

SECTION B

7. Overdependence on oil revenue has more positive impact than

negative impact on Nigerias economic development?

A. Agree [ ]

B. Strongly agree [ ]

C. Disagree [ ]

D. Strongly disagree [ ]

8. What are the negative impact of petroleum sub-sector on the

Niger Delta areas?

A. Oil pollution [ ]

B. Gas flaring [ ]

C. Inadequate compensation for the destruction of

economics crops.[ ]

D. Limited employment of Niger Delta citizens in the

activities of petroleum companies. [ ]

113
9. What are the positive impact of petroleum sub-sector on

Nigerias economy?

A. Contribution to Gross Domestic Product [ ]

B. Revenue generation &utilization [ ]

C. Employment generation [ ]

D. Foreign investment [ ]

10. Do you think that Nigerias overdependence on oil revenue

could be minimized?

A. Yes [ ] B. No [ ]

11. What are the factors that could minimize Nigerias

overdependence on oil revenue?

A. Agriculture [ ]

B. Tourism [ ]

C. Taxation [ ]

D. Solid minerals [ ]

12. Sustainable development of the solid mineral sector has been

identified as fundamental to the diversification of the nations

economic dependence on oil and gas?

A. Agree [ ]

114
B. Strongly agree [ ]

C. Disagree [ ]

D. Strongly disagree [ ]

13. Would you say that the oil sector of the Nigeria economy faces

some problems?

A. Yes [ ] B. No [ ]

14. What are the problems encountered by the Nigerian oil

sector?

A. Public control and bureaucracy [ ]

B. Poor funding of investments [ ]

C. Communal disturbances [ ]

D. Products adulteration [ ]

15. Federal government decides on massive importation of

petroleum products to forestall scarcity?

A. Agree [ ]

B. Strongly agree [ ]

C. Disagree [ ]

D. Strongly disagree [ ]

115
16. What is the extent of importation of petroleum products in

Nigeria?

A. High [ ]

B. Very high [ ]

C. Low [ ]

D. Very low [ ]

17. Nigeria regarded as one of the major exporters of crude oil in

the world, does have functional refineries, but depends totally

on importation of petroleum products for domestic

consumption?

A. Agree [ ]

B. Strongly agree [ ]

C. Disagree [ ]

D. Strongly disagree [ ]

116
117

Potrebbero piacerti anche