Schematic - Design of Airport PDF

Schematic Design Summary VISION
Cheyenne Regional Airport

09 February 2011 EXPERIENCE
Report prepared by Architectural Alliance International, Inc COMMITMENT
Schematic Design Summary
09 February 2011
Table of Contents
1. Executive Summary
2. Sense of Place
. Sense of Place Design Process
. Cheyenne Sense of Place Research
. Architectural Design Research
3. Design Process
. Workshop 1
. Workshop 2
. Workshop 3
4. Schematic Design
. Building Plans
. Room Schedule by Department
. Exterior Elevations
. Building sections
. Building Renderings
. Interior Material and Color Palette
5. Site Design
09 February 2011
1. Executive Summary
Executive Summary
1.00
09 February 2011
Executive Summary
From September 2010 through February 2011, SEH and Architectural Working from the Conceptual Design solution, the preferred Schematic
Alliance International were engaged by the Cheyenne Regional Airport to Design was developed through a series of Design Workshops with the
develop a schematic design option for a potential new terminal. full Airport Board and additional meetings with Airport Staff. Through
refinements based both on current conditions and reassessments of
The basis of this design was the 10 March 2008 Cheyenne Regional previous decisions, a revised program was reached to better meet long-
Airport Terminal Feasibility Study, which studied projected future demand term facility needs. After three workshops, Scheme 2C was selected
to determine the appropriate size and scope of a future terminal. The by the Airport Board as the preferred alternative. A two-level facility
Feasibility Study projected annual enplanements to reach 28,900 by (with additional partial basement) and accommodations for significant
the year 2027. In addition, the Feasibility Study examined a number of concession space is proposed, with accommodations for additional
potential locations for the future terminal, including redevelopment of the future expansion. The proposed Schematic Design totals 36,000 sf. This
existing terminal site as well new potential sites. The Feasibility Study compares to 30,400 sf in the Feasibility Study program document, and
recommended Site 3A, located due East of the existing terminal site, 35,000 sf in the Conceptual Design.
accessed from the redeveloped Airport Parkway. A Conceptual Design was
proposed as part of the Feasibility Study. Probable construction costs for the terminal building are projected to be
$297 per square foot, for a total construction cost of $10,700,000. (See
The Schematic Design effort took the recommendation of Site 3A and Connico Preliminary Rough Order of Magnitude Estimate, provided under
the programming and Conceptual Design work of the Feasibility Study as separate cover, for detailed information regarding terminal project cost.)
a launching point. The Schematic Design addresses operational needs Probable construction costs have been estimated at $3,200,000 for the
for the airlines and passenger service improvements such as adequate new parking lot and related access improvements and $2,500,000 for the
gate hold seating, pre-security waiting areas, security checkpoint layouts new apron. (See SEH supporting documents, provided under separate
capable of handling current and potential future needs, mechanical and cover, for detailed information regarding site work costs.) Together,
electrical system upgrades, more easily maintainable and aesthetically probable construction costs for the new terminal and site work are
pleasing finishes, and a strong design presence for the terminal as a estimated at a total of $16,400,000. Probable construction costs do not
representation of the city of Cheyenne and its surrounding region. include design fees.
Desired capacity was based upon service of two simultaneous Regional

Jet departures in regularly scheduled domestic passenger traffic (60 seats
per aircraft for a total of 120 seat gate hold capacity). This capacity was
further supported by the potential to service narrow body jets in charter
operations and the potential to handle diverted flights from Denver.
Executive Summary
1.01
09 February 2011
2. Sense of Place
Sense of Place
2.00
Memphis , Tennessee Anchorage, Alaska Cheyenne Regional Airport
09 February 2011
Sense of Place Design Process
VISION AND SENSE OF PLACE
A communitys airport plays an important role in communicating the

regions image to the rest of the world. The airport is the gateway to the
region for a great number of visitors each year and the first and last thing
travelers see. It is also the place that welcomes home residents of the
Cheyenne region, and it should be a great source of pride. An overall
coordinated vision benefits the long-term and incremental growth of
airport facilities and helps unite planning and design efforts over many
Sense of Place Boards
years.
Sense of Place Boards Developed concurrently with the terminals programming and early
building and site design, Sense of Place research was conducted to
inform how the design relates to the site, as well as inspire the buildings
forms and materials.
Examples of Sense of Place

integration
Examples of Sense of Place

integration
Sense of Place
2.01
09 February 2011
Cheyenne Sense of Place Research
Referred to as The Magic City of the Plains Cheyenne, the capital of Wyo-
ming, is the gateway to natural wonders, relics of the frontier, and outdoor
recreation. Research was conducted to identify historical, cultural and
physical attributes important to the city and region resulting in a collec-
tion of representative imagery ranging from industry, architecture, topog-
raphy and cultural influences. The goal of this task was to determine the
most appropriate and meaningful imagery that best conveys the spirit of
Cheyenne.
Key Findings:
A Junction of Railroads- influencing history (first transcontinental
railroad) industry, and culture
Topography/Landscape - unique landforms , arid plains, and
wildlife
Architecture - style, material, and form
Culture/Heritage - western frontier and cowboy heritage
The development of an all-encompassing design concept relating to

certain physical or cultural aspects of the area can contribute greatly to
making the airport experience an inviting and memorable one. From this
regions unique topography and landscape to its frontier heritage and
deeply rooted western culture, it offers a vast breadth from which to draw
inspiration that embodies the most unique aspects of Cheyenne and the
region.
Sense of Place
2.02
09 February 2011
Cheyenne Sense of Place Research
Topography and Landscape
The topography and unique landscape of endless horizons, vast plains,

and outcropping landforms inspired the development of a color and
material palette reflective of Cheyenne and the surrounding region.
Important man made elements also characteristic of the landscape were
used to inform pattern, texture and form. Railroad tracks create a uniform
and linear rhythm and pattern cutting through the landscape while snow
fences follow the contours of the landscape creating weathered visual
texture and unique shadows . All of these elements contribute to a design
that is rich with sense of place and meaningful to Cheyenne.
Western Icon
Cheyennes deep western frontier heritage is an important part of the

citys past and present. There is strong iconic and identifiable imagery
associated with the cowboy and the cowboy culture. The craftsmanship
and design associated with saddles, cowboy boots, and western gear is
very artistic and beautiful. The tooled and embossed leathers, the silver
accents and the filigree patterns can all inspire materials , colors and
patterns for the interior design.
Sense of Place
2.03
09 February 2011
Architectural Design Research
At the beginning of Schematic Design, Architectural Alliance International
researched the unique qualities of the City of Cheyenne, its history, cul-
ture, and its relationship to the natural surroundings. Four main concepts
were identified, which in turn informed the main concepts for the design of
Context the terminal building:
Context
Both the local context of the immediate site and the larger context of the
City of Cheyenne and the Upper Great Plains were carefully studied. From
the natural context, weve identified the regional weather, the prevail-
ing NW winds, and the strong solar orientation as important elements .
Moreover, man-made structures like the snow fences and the railroads as
well as the vernacular buildings became a source of inspiration for parts of
the design.
Porch Porch
The concept of a porch can be found at both regional vernacular buildings
and more contemporary designs, and functionally relates to the transi-
tional space between the inside and the outside of the building. Experi-
entially, a porch functions as the front door for arriving and departing
passengers.
Screen
Screens are architectural elements used to modulate and filter sun light,
control winds, and filter or screen views. Inspired by the local snow fences
Screen and railroad cattle cars, these screens also have the potential of introduc-
ing dynamic and controlled patterns of shadow and light into the building.
Sustainability
With the belief that every buiding design is a careful response to its natural
and cultural sites, the schematic design represents an energy efficient
building that implements the sustainable strategies of daylighting, water
efficiency, use of local and renewable materials, and highly efficient me-
chanical systems among others.
Sustainability
Sense of Place
2.05
09 February 2011
3. Design Process
Design Process
3.00
09 February 2011
Program Refinement
During the course of the workshops with Airport Staff and the Airport Additional Concession Space
Board, a number of changes were made to programming assumptions The Board directed that additional concession space (beyond the restau-
developed during the 2008 Feasibility Study. These changes were driven rant) should be included as part of the Schematic Design. These tenant
by changes in current conditions and reassessments of previous decisions. spaces may not be strictly driven by passenger traffic, so the spaces were
Among the critical changes that impacted the Schematic Design: located at the east end of the terminal, where they are adjacent to the
short term parking lot. This location also allows for the spaces to be easily
Restaurant Size, Location, and Scope repurposed for future terminal expansion. Further, this location would
The Feasibility Study assumed a large, signature restaurant and bar lo- allow the concession space to be modified or eliminated during future
cated on the second floor of the terminal that would be directed primarily design phases without significantly impacting the terminal layout. The
at Cheyenne residents rather than passengers. Based on the financial current layout shows three spaces totaling approximately 500 sf each,
difficulties of the existing restaurant at the current terminal, the recent capable of accommodating office or small retail tenants.
expansion of restaurant offerings within Cheyenne, and the significant in-
vestment involved in a large restaurant, the Board ultimately decided that Airline Ticket Offices
a smaller restaurant with more limited offerings, located to serve primarily Based on the success of the recently instituted American Eagle service to
passengers would be more appropriate. DFW, the Board directed that the Schematic Design should accommodate
three full Airline Ticket Offices in addition to a dedicated TSA space. The
Multi-story Building Conceptual Design had shown TSA occupying a future ATO space, but this
The Level Two program in the Conceptual Design was dominated by the would have required TSA to relocate should a third Airline be recruited,
restaurant component, and when this was relocated, there was a question and left no swing space for charter operations.
as to whether or not the building should remain a multi-story building. The
Board determined that the multi-story building was still justified because
the cost difference was determined to be insignificant, the second story
gave the building additional presence on the site, it programmatically
made sense to separate the administrative functions, and because of the
efficiencies allowed by the partial basement.
Gate Hold and Security

The Gate Hold area was increased from a capacity of 60 in the Feasibility
Study to 120 in Schematic Design to allow it to accommodate two simul-
taneous regional jet departures (the ability to accommodate narrow-body
jets and to handle diverted planes from Denver was also a factor in this
decision). The Security Checkpoint was enlarged to allow it to accommo-
date the latest TSA requirements.
Design Process
3.01
09 February 2011
Workshop 1
Workshop 1 was held on 27 September 2010 at the offices of the Cheyenne
Regional Airport. Present were representatives of Architectural Alliance
International, SEH, Airport Director David Haring, and Airport Staff.
The Feasibility Study was validated, especially relative to changes in
airport operations driven by the addition of American Eagle service and the
closure of the existing restaurant.
The design process was explained, and examples of previous projects

were shown.
Results of initial Sense of Place and Architectural Design Research were

presented.
Sustainability was identified as an important consideration, especially

to the extent that careful building design, orientation, and selection of
appropriate building systems could reduce long-term operating costs.
Design Process
3.02
09 February 2011
Workshop 2
Workshop 2 was held on 10 November 2010 at the offices of the Cheyenne Four plans were presented that demonstrated options for the restaurant
Regional Airport as a part of the regularly scheduled Airport Board meeting. within the new terminal.

Present were representatives of Architectural Alliance International, SEH,
Airport Director David Haring, and the Airport Board. Schemes 1A and 1B are both one level schemes. Scheme 1A locates the
restaurant adjacent to the Gate Hold for easy passenger access. Scheme
The Sense of Place and Architectural Design Research was presented to the 1B locates the restaurant to the west, for adjacencies to the Loading Dock
Airport Board. and Short Term Parking and ease of after-hours access.
Floor Plan Scheme 1A Floor Plan Scheme 1B
Design Process
3.03

09 February 2011
Concept Sketches
Workshop 2
Schemes 2A and 2B are both two level schemes. Unlike the Conceptual Sketches were presented demonstrating both a two level option and a one
Design, which show the two level massing located to the East, these level option with a high-roofed volume over the public spaces.
schemes shift the two level massing to the West, still retaining a generous
double-height space at the Arrivals and Departures Hall and the Gate The Airport Board selected Scheme 2A as their preferred option,
Hold space. Both show a large, signature Restaurant space located at the demonstrating strong support for a two level option. There was, however,
Northwest of the terminal to maximize views to the airfield. Scheme 2A some concern about whether the terminal could support a large, signature
shows the Security Checkpoint oriented East-West, whereas Scheme 2B restaurant. They requested another alternative be prepared demonstrating
shows it oriented North-South. a smaller scale restaurant located on Level One, but still retaining
administrative functions on Level Two.

Floor Plan Scheme 2A

Floor Plan Scheme 2B

Design Process
3.04
09 February 2011
Workshop 3
Workshop 3 was held on 08 December 2010 at the offices of the Cheyenne Scheme 2C is an alternative showing a smaller restaurant located immedi-
Regional Airport as a part of the regularly scheduled Airport Board meet- ately to the west of the Gate Hold space, but still retaining an upper level
ing. Present were representatives of Architectural Alliance International, for the administrative functions and public viewing space. Scheme 2C has
SEH, Airport Director David Haring, and the Airport Board. the advantage of offering better service for passengers, while still main-
taining strong views to the airfield.
As requested by the Board at the previous workshop, two schemes were
presented. Scheme 2A is a refinement of the preferred plan presented Scheme 2C was ultimately selected by the Airport Board.
at the previous meeting with a large, signature restaurant located in the
northwest corner of Level Two.

Floor Plan Scheme 2A
Floor Plan Scheme 2C

Design Process
3.05

09 February 2011
Workshop 3
SECTION
Interior renderings were presented, showing how the public spaces of the
terminal are impacted by the changes between the 2A and 2C schemes.
SCHEME 2A
SCHEME 2C
Design Process
3.06
09 February 2011
Workshop 3
Two alternate exterior expressions were presented. Both options show a
curbside faade dominated by glazing with vestibules projecting through
the faade, and both are anchored by large stone or concrete panels.
Option 1 utilizes a random patterned metal screening element along

the upper stories, used to moderate the solar exposure into the spaces.
Option 2 shows a more consistent upper faade of metal panels,
interrupted by large glass openings crowned by projecting roof forms
which act to shield the sun.
The options demonstrate two possible treatments of a curbside canopy

one a solid projecting element and the other made up of glass and steel.
The Board preferred Option 2, but expressed some concern that the design
was still too heavy or boxy, and further expressed concern about the
building being dominated by flat roofs. This concern was addressed in
subsequent refinements of the final Schematic Design.
Design Process
3.07

09 February 2011
4. Schematic Design
Schematic Design
4.00
09 February 2011
A
20' - 0"
B
20' - 0"
C
30' - 0"
D.5
30' - 0"
F
20' - 0"
G
20' - 0"
H
20' - 0"
I
20' - 0"
J
20' - 0"
K
20' - 0"
L
20' - 0"
M
20' - 0"
N
20' - 0"
O
30' - 0"
Q
20' - 0"
R
20' - 0"
S Plan Description
Gate 1 Gate 2
Vestibule 41 42
35 50 SF 50 SF
6 73 SF
Gate Hold FUTURE
10' - 0"
44 GATEHOLD
Level One, 25,300 sf Level Two, 5,400 sf

2754 SF EXPANSION
5 DN
5
FUTURE
Deplaning Corridor
EXPANSION
20' - 0"
The Schematic Design proposes a facility with primary public and airport A second floor over the west portion of the building would be served by an
629 SF
65
30' - 0"
Baggage Make- Up
73
4 2128 SF
10' - 0"
operations on the ground level, with public access from two entrances elevator and provide administrative space and a large Conference Room
Screening Monitor Vending Jan Toilet Toilet
3 Baggage
Kitchen
17
32
69 SF
31
63 SF
33
109 SF
82
41 SF
81
54 SF
80
54 SF
3
3 266 SF AT O AT O AT O Circ
Restaurant
524 SF 70 69 68 74
Men Women Jan 26
Gate Lobby and Security
23' - 0"
51 52 981 SF 322 SF 322 SF 322 SF 361 SF
along the curbside (one at Ticketing and one at Bag Claim) and additional capable of holding Airport Board meetings with public seating. There is an
43 TSA Bag Screening Concessions Concessions
28' - 0"
Dock / Receiving 305 SF 305 SF 31 SF 71 75 76

9 TSA Office
429 SF
Passenger Scr eening
61 72
323 SF 454 SF 502 SF
Operations
Unisex 1457 SF 487 SF
50
95 SF
2 Public Space
1.8 Vestibule
22
Lobby
21
157 SF
Baggage Claim
64
3116 SF
Departure / Arrival Hall
62
3307 SF Ticketing Hall
Concession Circulation
97
Vestibule
79
92 SF Concessions entrances from both the East and West Short Term Parking Lots. The Upper Gallery providing views to the airfield and the Arrivals and Depar-
32' - 0"
597 SF
63
27' - 0"
68 SF
Building Systems
Ticketing Hall, Arrivals and Departures Hall, and Bag Claim together form a tures Hall for the general public and a Breakout Space with soft seating.
DN 2723 SF
1 UP
UP
Concessions
77
Vestibule 529 SF
1
1' - 6"
The Administration area contains four office spaces and support functions,
Vestibule
generous public space that would be populated with welcoming soft seat-
0.9 16
152 SF
2
152 SF
Rental Car Rental Car Rental Car Rental Car
ing and a fireplace lounge for waiting passengers and the public. including a Kitchen. The Kitchen, Upper Gallery, and Breakout Space can
66 59 55 53
160 SF 161 SF 160 SF 160 SF
LEVEL 1 work in conjunction with the Conference Room to host public functions.
level 1
0 32 48 64 In the Ticketing Hall, the facility is designed to accommodate three Airline
Ticket Offices (ATO) with adjacent Baggage Make-Up spaces. There is Lower Level, 5,300 sf
A B C D.5 F G H I J K L M N O Q R S
dedicated space for Transportation Security Administration (TSA) of- A partial basement is designed for provision of Mechanical space and easy
20' - 0" 20' - 0" 30' - 0" 30' - 0" 20' - 0" 20' - 0" 20' - 0" 20' - 0" 20' - 0" 20' - 0"
fices. The Security Checkpoint is designed to accommodate the latest distribution to the upper floors through a Utility Tunnel. Storage space is
6
TSA requirements and to provide flexibility for future changes in security provided both for the Airport and for concession users. Additional space is
10' - 0"
requirements. The Gate Hold contains seating for 120 and two departure provided for storm refuge of up to 260 people. As the design progresses,
20' - 0"
OPEN TO BELOW
4
gates with room for easy expansion to a third departure gate or the option the exact extents of the partial basement will need to be determined based
10' - 0"
3 Upper Gallery
3
Office Office
on Mechanical and Storage needs (in concert with budget refinement).

15
to add a passenger boarding bridge. There is a fully separated Deplaning

Director 91 90
92 Office 708 SF
118 SF 118 SF Kitchen
23' - 0"
314 SF 89
88
28' - 0"
139 SF
187 SF
Copy Conf Room
10
Corridor. The Bag Claim provides 50 linear feet of flat plate baggage claim
96
663 SF ROOF
Lobby
64 SF Buffet
84 Storage 2
Reception / Circ
1.8 23
69 SF Intern Admin Stor age 94
67 SF 87
Jan 46 SF
Toilet
85 Public Space
95 93 582 SF
86 83 SF
72 SF 157 SF Circ
area, with space to accommodate a future T shaped device to provide

43 SF
32' - 0"
99
OPEN TO BELOW Offices
27' - 0"
1095 SF
Break-Out
OPEN TO BELOW 36
Building Systems
1 DN Stair 2 641 SF
additional capacity.
24
230 SF DN
1
1' - 6"
0.9
Located immediately adjacent to the Gate Hold, a Restaurant conces-

level 2
LEVEL 2
sion space is open to the public but primarily oriented towards meeting
0 32 48 64
the needs of flight passengers. The Restaurant and associated Kitchen
totals 1250 sf. In addition to the Restaurant space, the Schematic Design
A
20' - 0"
B
20' - 0"
C
30' - 0"
D.5
30' - 0"
F
20' - 0"
G
20' - 0"
H
20' - 0"
I
20' - 0"
J
20' - 0"
K
20' - 0"
L
20' - 0"
M
20' - 0"
N
20' - 0"
O
30' - 0"
Q
20' - 0"
R
20' - 0"
S accommodates three additional concession spaces at the east end of
6
the terminal, totaling 1500 sf of leasable space and 600 sf of associated
10' - 0"
5 UP
5 circulation space (this space is designed to be easily convertible to future
20' - 0"
Airline Ticket Offices should future passenger demand require it). There
30' - 0"
4
10' - 0"
are also four Rental Car Offices provided, totaling 640 sf.
Utility Tunnel
39
1719 SF
3 3
23' - 0"
Mechanical Room
28' - 0"
Storm Refuge 37
83 Storage 1368 SF
1306 SF 98
359 SF
2
1.8
Concession Storage
38
520 SF
27' - 0"
1 UP
1' - 6"
0.9
Concessions
lower level
LOWER LEVEL Building Systems
0 32 48 64
Schematic Design
4.01
09 February 2011
20' - 0" 20' - 0" 30' - 0" 30' - 0" 20' - 0" 20' - 0" 20' - 0" 20' - 0" 20' - 0" 20' - 0" 20' - 0" 20' - 0" 20' - 0" 30' - 0" 20' - 0" 20' - 0"
Gate 1 Gate 2
Vestibule 41 42
35 50 SF 50 SF
6 73 SF
Gate Hold FUTURE
10' - 0"
44 GATEHOLD
2754 SF EXPANSION
5 DN
5
FUTURE
Deplaning Corridor
EXPANSION
20' - 0"
629 SF
65
30' - 0"
Baggage Make- Up
73
4 2128 SF
10' - 0"
Screening Monitor Vending Jan Toilet Toilet

3 Baggage
Kitchen
17
32
69 SF
31
63 SF
33
109 SF
82
41 SF
81
54 SF
80
54 SF
3
3 266 SF AT O AT O AT O Circ
Restaurant
524 SF 70 69 68 74
Men Women Jan 26
Gate Lobby and Security
23' - 0"
51 52 981 SF 322 SF 322 SF 322 SF 361 SF
43 TSA Bag Screening Concessions Concessions
28' - 0"
Dock / Receiving 305 SF 305 SF 31 SF 71 75 76

9 TSA Office
429 SF
Passenger Scr eening
61 72
323 SF 454 SF 502 SF
Operations
Unisex 1457 SF 487 SF
50
95 SF
2 Public Space
Lobby Vestibule
Baggage Claim Departure / Arrival Hall 79
1.8 Vestibule
21
157 SF 64 62
Concession Circulation
97
92 SF Concessions
22 3116 SF 3307 SF Ticketing Hall
32' - 0"
597 SF
63
27' - 0"
68 SF
DN 2723 SF Building Systems
1 UP
UP
Concessions
77
Vestibule 529 SF
1
1' - 6"
Vestibule
0.9 16
152 SF
2
152 SF
Rental Car Rental Car Rental Car Rental Car

66 59 55 53
160 SF 161 SF 160 SF 160 SF
LEVEL 1
0 32 48 64
Schematic Design
4.02
09 February 2011
20' - 0" 20' - 0" 30' - 0" 30' - 0" 20' - 0" 20' - 0" 20' - 0" 20' - 0" 20' - 0" 20' - 0"
6
10' - 0"
5
20' - 0"
OPEN TO BELOW
4
10' - 0"
3 Upper Gallery
3
Office Office
Director 91 90 15
92 Office 708 SF
118 SF 118 SF Kitchen
23' - 0"
314 SF 89
88
28' - 0"
139 SF
187 SF
Copy Conf Room
96 10
663 SF ROOF
Lobby
64 SF Buffet
84 Storage 2
Reception / Circ
1.8 23
69 SF Intern Admin Stor age 94
67 SF 87
Jan 46 SF
Toilet
85 Public Space
95 93 582 SF
86 83 SF
72 SF 157 SF 43 SF Circ
32' - 0"
99
OPEN TO BELOW Offices
27' - 0"
1095 SF
Break-Out
OPEN TO BELOW 36
Building Systems
1 DN Stair 2
24
641 SF
230 SF DN
1
1' - 6"
0.9
LEVEL 2
0 32 48 64
Schematic Design
4.03
09 February 2011
20' - 0" 20' - 0" 30' - 0" 30' - 0" 20' - 0" 20' - 0" 20' - 0" 20' - 0" 20' - 0" 20' - 0" 20' - 0" 20' - 0" 20' - 0" 30' - 0" 20' - 0" 20' - 0"
6
10' - 0"
5 UP
5
20' - 0"
30' - 0"
4
10' - 0"
Utility Tunnel
39
1719 SF
3 3
23' - 0"
Mechanical Room
28' - 0"
Storm Refuge 37
83 Storage 1368 SF
1306 SF 98
359 SF
2
1.8
Concession Storage
38
520 SF
27' - 0"
1 UP
1' - 6"
0.9
Concessions
LOWER LEVEL Building Systems
0 32 48 64
Schematic Design
4.04
09 February 2011
Room Schedule
Room Schedule
Building Systems Operations Shows the Schematic Design building program broken out into the follow-
Utility Tunnel Lower Level 1719 SF Baggage Make-Up Level 1 2128 SF
Mechanical Room Lower Level 1368 SF Baggage Level 1 524 SF ing departments:
Storm Refuge Lower Level 1306 SF TSA Office Level 1 487 SF
Dock / Receiving Level 1 429 SF Circ Level 1 361 SF
Storage Lower Level 359 SF TSA Bag Screening Level 1 323 SF Building Systems Mechanical and building support spaces
Jan Level 2 43 SF ATO Level 1 322 SF
Jan Level 1 31 SF ATO Level 1 322 SF Concessions Leasable spaces, including Restaurant, Rental Car Offices,
5255 SF ATO Level 1 322 SF and other Tenant Spaces
4790 SF
Concessions Gate Lobby and Security Gate Hold, Security Checkpoint, and associated
Restaurant Level 1 981 SF Public Space
Concessions Level 1 529 SF Departure / Arrival Hall Level 1 3307 SF
support spaces
Concession Storage Lower Level 520 SF Baggage Claim Level 1 3116 SF Offices Administrative Offices, Conference Room, and support spaces
Concessions Level 1 502 SF Ticketing Hall Level 1 2723 SF
Concessions Level 1 454 SF Circ Level 2 1095 SF Operations Airline Ticket Offices, Baggage Make-Up, Baggage Claim, and
Kitchen
Rental Car
Level 1
Level 1
266 SF
161 SF
Upper Gallery
Break-Out
Level
Level
2
2
708 SF
641 SF
support spaces
Rental Car Level 1 160 SF Concession Circulation Level 1 597 SF Public Space Public gathering, circulation, and support spaces
Rental Car Level 1 160 SF Men Level 1 305 SF
Rental Car Level 1 160 SF Women Level 1 305 SF
3893 SF Stair 1 Level 1 230 SF
Stair 2 Level 2 230 SF
Gate Lobby and Security Lobby Level 1 157 SF
Gate Hold Level 1 2754 SF Vestibule Level 1 152 SF
Passenger Screening Level 1 1457 SF Vestibule Level 1 152 SF
Deplaning Corridor Level 1 629 SF Unisex Level 1 95 SF
Vending Level 1 109 SF Vestibule Level 1 92 SF
Vestibule Level 1 73 SF Toilet Level 2 83 SF
Screening Level 1 69 SF Lobby Level 2 69 SF
Monitor Level 1 63 SF Vestibule Level 1 68 SF
Toilet Level 1 54 SF 14126 SF
Toilet Level 1 54 SF 35993 SF
Gate 1 Level 1 50 SF
Gate 2 Level 1 50 SF
Jan Level 1 41 SF
5403 SF
Offices
Conf Room Level 2 663 SF
Reception / Circ Level 2 582 SF
Director Level 2 314 SF
Kitchen Level 2 187 SF
Admin Storage Level 2 157 SF
Office Level 2 139 SF
Intern Level 2 72 SF
Buffet Level 2 67 SF
Copy Level 2 64 SF
Storage Level 2 46 SF
2526 SF
Schematic Design
4.05
09 February 2011
south elevation
0 5 15 30 FT
Building Elevations
The Schematic Design proposal orients the curbside faade to approxi-
mately due south, aligning it with the runway beyond. This orientation
allows for favorable solar access, bringing in south light which can be
modulated by sunscreening elements and deep overhangs, allowing for
more sun in the winter months when it is needed, and less in the summer
months when it isnt.
The south faade is grounded by light colored precast concrete panels at

the east end. These are envisioned to relate to the tones of the light sand-
stone that is found regionally, and will have texture and tones to enliven
west elevation them. At the ground level, there will be extensive glazing that is shielded
0 5 15 30 FT
by the deep roadside canopy. The glazing will be penetrated by the two
vestibules and the rental car offices, which are envisioned to be clad in
wood on both the interior and exterior.
The building massing steps up to its multi-story massing, and at the far
west end is terminated by the stair and elevator tower, which is again clad
in the precast concrete panels.
Schematic Design
4.06
09 February 2011
north elevation
0 5 15 30 FT
Building Elevations
The upper story of the terminal is clad in a mix of copper metal panels and
in select locations, large expanses of glazing that bring daylighting deep
into the space. These windows will be carefully located to take advantage
of views, and will be treated with sunscreening elements as their exposure
requires. Windows on the buildings north faade are able to bring in
daylight without concern about heat gain or glare.
The precast panels and metal panels wrap the more utilitarian portions of
the terminals airside, but the Gate Hold, Restaurant, and Upper Gallery all
have expansive views out to the airside and are treated with glazing and
east elevation articulated copper panels.
0 5 15 30 FT
Schematic Design
4.07
09 February 2011
Building Sections
In response to the Boards concerns about a flat-roofed terminal design
and that the building looked too boxy or heavy during Workshop 3, the
exterior design was reevaluated. A Butterfly roof was determined to be a
good fit for the terminal, providing a light feeling roof with deep overhangs
to provide sun protection. This roof form allows water to be controlled ef-
fectively, keeping it from running onto either the curbside or the airside. It
also allows for rain water to be collected and retained for site irrigation.
cross section at cafe
cross section at gate hold
Schematic Design
4.08
09 February 2011
Building Renderings
A continuous clerestory window immediately below the deep overhang
makes the roof appear to float over the building. The continuous glaz-
ing at the curbside makes for an easy transition between the interior and
the exterior spaces, with the fireplace visible and inviting. A smaller light
monitor over the ticketing hall brings sunlight into these spaces.
view of terminal from access road
view of terminal from parking
Schematic Design
4.09
09 February 2011
view of curb side
view of curb side at baggage claim
view of curb side from SW
Schematic Design
4.10
09 February 2011
view of gate hold from NW
view of gate hold from NE
Schematic Design
4.11
09 February 2011
view of arrival/departure hall
Schematic Design
4.12
09 February 2011
Interior Material and Color Concept A Interior Material and Color Concept B
Schematic Design
4.13
09 February 2011
Concrete Floor Pattern
Schematic Design
4.14
09 February 2011
5. Site Design
Site Design
5.00

Schematic - Design of Airport PDF

Caricato da

Informazioni sul documento

Titolo originale

Copyright

Formati disponibili

Condividi questo documento

Condividi o incorpora il documento

Opzioni di condivisione

Hai trovato utile questo documento?

Questo contenuto è inappropriato?

Copyright:

Formati disponibili

Schematic - Design of Airport PDF

Caricato da

Copyright:

Formati disponibili

Schematic Design Summary VISION

Cheyenne Regional Airport

Desired capacity was based upon service of two simultaneous Regional

A communitys airport plays an important role in communicating the

Examples of Sense of Place

Examples of Sense of Place

The development of an all-encompassing design concept relating to

The topography and unique landscape of endless horizons, vast plains,

Cheyennes deep western frontier heritage is an important part of the

Gate Hold and Security

The design process was explained, and examples of previous projects

Results of initial Sense of Place and Architectural Design Research were

Sustainability was identified as an important consideration, especially

Floor Plan Scheme 1A Floor Plan Scheme 1B

Floor Plan Scheme 2A

Option 1 utilizes a random patterned metal screening element along

The options demonstrate two possible treatments of a curbside canopy

Level One, 25,300 sf Level Two, 5,400 sf

Dock / Receiving 305 SF 305 SF 31 SF 71 75 76

Rental Car Rental Car Rental Car Rental Car

on Mechanical and Storage needs (in concert with budget refinement).

to add a passenger boarding bridge. There is a fully separated Deplaning

area, with space to accommodate a future T shaped device to provide

Located immediately adjacent to the Gate Hold, a Restaurant conces-

Screening Monitor Vending Jan Toilet Toilet

Dock / Receiving 305 SF 305 SF 31 SF 71 75 76

Rental Car Rental Car Rental Car Rental Car

The south faade is grounded by light colored precast concrete panels at

cross section at cafe

cross section at gate hold

view of terminal from access road

view of terminal from parking

view of curb side

view of curb side at baggage claim

view of curb side from SW

view of gate hold from NW

view of gate hold from NE

view of arrival/departure hall

Concrete Floor Pattern

Potrebbero piacerti anche