Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
by
Wang-Ping Chen
SUBMITTED IN
PARTIAL FULFILLMENT
at the
September 1979
OFLIBRARIES
LIBRARIES
SEISMIC STUDIES OF CENTRAL ASIA: SOME CHARACTERISTICS OF
by
Wang-Ping Chen
ABSTRACT
tensor form.
mantle heat flux of about 0.9 HFU at the base of the crust.
seismology.
ABSTRACT .................................................... 2
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ............................................ 4
I. INTRODUCTION ............................................ 6
collision process.
fact, could reach the solidus of the lower crust and cause
CHAPTER II
SEISMIC MOMENTS OF MAJOR EARTHQUAKES AND THE AVERAGE RATE OF SLIP IN CENTRAL ASIA
Abstract. Seismic moments for 12 major the 50-mm/yr convergence between India and
earthquakes (M > 7.6) in central Asia from 1911 Eurasia occurs as fault creep. As this rate
to 1967 were calculated from long-period is inversely proportional to the assumed
Rayleigh and Love wave spectral densities. thickness of the layer, given the uncertainties
With fault lengths estimated from geological in the estimates of the moments, all of this
field observations of surface faulting, convergence could occur as seismic slip
intensity distributions, or master event without fault creep in a layer 40 but not
relocations of aftershocks, the calculated 100 km thick. Similarly, the calculated
moments place bounds on the average slip and seismic slip rate seems to be too high for all
fault widths. The following table summarizes of the seismic slip to be confined to a thin
the calculated moments, estimated fault lengths, layer such as the San Andreas fault (0l km).
and inferred possible average displacements.
Introduction
Earthquake Length, Slip,
Location Year Mo, dyn-cm km m The current tectonic activity in central
Asia is interpreted as a consequence of a
Kebin, 1911 4.9 x 1027 180 2.3 continental collision between India and
Kirgizia Eurasia [e.g., Dewey and Burke, 1973; Molnar
Haiyuan, 1920 3.0 x 1028 200 10 et al., 1973; Molnar and Tapponnier, 1975].
Kansu Since the late Eocene, approximately 2000 km
Ku-long, 1927 4.3 x 1027 150 2.4 of crustal shortening seems to have taken place
Kansu after the collision between India and Eurasia.
Fuh-Yun, 1931 8.5 x 1027 300 1.9 Major east-west trending left-lateral strike-
Sinkiang slip faults and other major tectonic features
Bihar-Nepal 1934 1.1 x 1028 130 5.4 in China and Mongolia are revealed by the
Eastern 1947 9.8 x 1026 ? ? interpretation of Landsat photographs, fault
Himalaya plane solutions, and the surface deformation
Khait, 1949 2.4 x 1027 70 3.7 during earthquakes. Molnar and Tapponnier
Tajikistan [1975] infer that the pattern of deformation
Assam, 1950 4.0 x 1028 250 6.6 is such that a considerable amount of the
India convergence between India and Asia is absorbed
South Tibet 1951 4.6 x 1027 200 ? by lateral motion along these strike-slip
Muya, 1957 1.4 x 1027 35 4.5 faults.
Siberia In the present study we determined the
Gobi-Altai, 1957 1.3 x 1028 270 3.2 seismic moments of major earthquakes (M > 7.6)
Mongolia (Table 1 and Figure 1) in this area since
Mogod, 1967 3.8 x 1026 40 1.0 1911 and calculated the average rate of
Mongolia deformation caused by slip during earthquakes.
The seismic moment (Mo ) is the fundamental
The inferred average displacements on the parameter describing static changes in the
faults, in general, agree with field earth caused by earthquakes. Mo = VAAi, where
observations, if in some cases rupture zones p is the rigidity, A is the fault area, and
extend to 40-km depth. Differences in arrival Au is the average displacement along the fault
times between P and P for some other [Aki, 1966]. By summing the seismic moments
earthquakes in Asia indicate focal depths of for many earthquakes during the last 100 years
40 km and support the inference of brittle we calculate the average seismic slip rate
failure to the same depth. The average strain and compare it with the relative convergence
pattern caused by seismic slip shows a nearly rate between India and Eurasia.
north-south horizontal compression (or
shortening), a considerable amount of vertical Data and Analysis
expansion of the crust (uplift and crustal
thickening), and some nearly east-west We collected as many seismograms as we
horizontal extension. For different assump- could for earthquakes in central Asia since
tions about recurrence rates of large and 1911 with M > 7.6 (Table 1) and determined
small earthquakes the calculated shortening their seismic moments from long-period
for a layer 40 km thick is about 20 mm/yr. surface wave spectral densities [Aki, 1966].
It is tempting to infer that the remainder of All the seismograms used in this study for the
earthquakes occurring before the installation
of the World-Wide Standardized Seismograph
TABLE 1. Major Events in central Asia, 1911-1957
Corrected
Epicentral Spectral Source
Distance, Az, Period, Instru- Magnifi- Density,a Moment, Parameters,b
Station Component deg deg Phase s ment cation cm-s dyn-cm deg
c
May 22, 1927 22h 32m 42s 38.05 0 N, 102.37 0 E (M = 8.0, 8 . 3 d)
HOH 65.0 -67 RI 50 Wiechert 4.5 3.1 1.3 1027 45, N60W, 45S;
GTT 62.5 -45 RI 50 Wiechert 5.4 18.5 8.0 1027 oblique thrust
GTT 62.5 -45 R1 50 Wiechert 7.8 6.4 2.8 1027
LPZ 158.0 -26 GI 1 00 S Wiechert 5.1 11.8 1.2 1028
January 15, 1934 08h 43m 18s 27.55 0 N, 87:09 0 E (M = 8.3, C 8. 4d)
RAV 62.3 -47 RI 50 Wiechert 3.9 40.3 1.7 10 2 90, EW, 20N;
RIV 85.9 131 GIl 100 Wiechert 1.3 14.7 6.8 1027 low angle thrust
RIV
f
85.9 131 GIl 100 Wiechert 1.8 29.4 1.4 1028
VIC R2 f
100.0 20 100 Milne-Shaw 4 0.05 9 g 9.8 1027
SJpe 127.9 -33 G3 100 Wennere 9.4
e
8.3 e 8.2 1027
TABLE 1. (continued)
Corrected
Epicentral Spectral Source
Distance, Az, Period, Instru- Magnifi- Density, Moment, Parameters,
Station Component deg deg Phase a ment cation cm-s dyn-cm deg
0 0
July 29, 1947 13h 43m 22s 28.63 N, 93.73 E (M = 7. 7 ,c 7 . 9 d)
STU 65.7 -1356
Rl 50 Wiechert 4.5 5.2 1.8 1027
27
90, EW, 10ON;
RIV 82.4 R1 100 Wiechert 1.2 1.7 1.3 10 low angle thrust
135
RIV 82.4 Rl 100 Wiechert 1.2 5.3 4.1 1027
28135 102 6
PAS 110.3 RI 100 1-90 21.8 0.66 3.2
PAS 110.3
28 GI
28
100 1-90 21.8 0.34 3.0 102
6
UPP 38.8 -40 Ri 50 Wiechert 6.3 8.2 1.3 x 10 28 90, EW, 45S;
PAS 106.4 8 R1 100 1-90 21.8 1.7 4.4 x o1026 thrust
TABLE 1. (continued)
Corrected
Epicentral Spectral Source
Distance, Az, Period, Instru- Magnifi- Density,a Moment, Parameters,b
Station Component deg deg Phase s ment cation cm-s dyn-cm deg
o
December 4.
f
1957 03h 37m 45s 45.31 0 N,n 99.21-E ,
(M = 8.3J ) 1028 42, NT7W, 42s;
UPP 48.2 -42 100 Wiechert 2.3 10.4 1.2 1027 A
57.8 -51 100 Wiechert 0.3 6.1 6.3 strike-slip
STU 1028 and thrust
93.4 30 250 30-90 36. 54.7 2.2 and thrustn
PAS
93.4 30 200 30-90 83. 37.8 1.2 1028
PAS
93.4 30 250 30-90 36. 48.4 1.9 1028
PAS
93.4 30 200 30-90 83. 30.9 1.0 1028
PAS
PAS 93.4 30 250 30-90 36. 49.5 1.9 10 28
30 200 30-90 83. 34.6 1.1 1028
PAR 1 Q3. 4 ..
avalues are horizontal displacement spectral densities for G waves, or vertical displacement spectral
densities for R waves if using z-component; horizontal displacement spectral densities otherwise. All are
no malized for geometrical spreading and attenuation to the source.
The source parameters are the slip angle, the strike and the dip, respectively. Source depth is
fixed at 25 km except where otherwise noted.
cValue is from Gutenbure and Richter [1954].
dValue is from Richter [1958].
eInformation is from Brune and Engen [1969], and the spectral density is at A = 90o (U z for R wave).
fInformation is from Brune and King [1967], and the ground amplitude is at A = 900 (Uz for R waves).
gThis value is the absolute ground amplitude in cm. 0 0
12 N.
hThe values in parentheses are calculated for a pure thrust fault striking N81 E, dipping
iData for this station are from Ben-Menahem et al. [1974].
JValue is from Duda [1965].
---- ~-
----- _ ~_ __ _ __ ___ -__~---------~------ ------ s__ --s_~_~_
Fig. 1. Map showing major recent tectonic features of Asia (adapted from Molnar and Tapponnier
[1975]), events studied from 1911 to 1967, and major shocks from 1862 to 1907.
Chen and Molnar: Seismic Moments and Slip Rate 15.
R IV JAN 3 1911
N-S
24:13
Fig. 2a. Seismograms of Kebin event of 1911, Riverview, Australia, and Paris.
Sections between crosses are digitized and used to calculate the spectral
densities.
Network (WWSSN) are shown in Figur es 2a to 2i. force configuration and a steplike time
Surface waves with periods up to 6 0 s are function, from the spectral densities by using
clearly recorded in all cases. We digitized the tables constructed by Ben-Menahem et al.
the seismograms, corrected them fo r the curva- [1970]. We then took for the seismic moment
ture of the trace due to a stylus of finite the geometric average of the different
length, and calculated spectral de nsities. estimates.
In general, we used the average sp ectral den- Fault lengths were estimated from surface
sity over the period range of 90 t o 110 s. breaks observed in the field, intensity
Whenever clear signals with period s much longer distributions, or master event relocations of
than 100 s were recorded, particul arly for very aftershocks. The main shock was used as a
long paths (e.g., R2 or G2 ), we us ed the master event, and station residuals from the
spectral densities at the longer p eriods. If, master event were subtracted from the
on the other hand, signals with pe riods of arrival times of the aftershocks to calculate
100 s were not directly visible on the seismo- the new locations of the aftershocks. Stations
gram, we used spectral densities o nly for not used to locate the main shock were not
periods of 50 s; however, in this case spectral used to relocate the aftershocks. We used the
densities were used only for stati ons with arrival times listed in the Bulletin of the
relatively simple paths which do n ot cross International Seismological Summary (ISS). We
continental margins or the heterog eneous struc- arbitrarily assigned an uncertainty of 2 s for
ture that exists in much of Asia. We used each of the arrival times and used a program
Love waves (G2 and G3 ) with period s of 200 s written by B. Julian, in which arrival times
recorded by long-period seismograp hs of the from particular stations are assigned weights
WWSSN to study the Mogod, Mongolia ,earthquake depending on their calculated residuals. Focal
of January 5, 1967. depths were restrained to 15 km, as in general
Fault plane solutions were dete rmined from there were no nearby stations to constrain the
initial motions of P waves or from geologic depths. For most events, calculated
field observations and macroseismi c data or uncertainties were less for the master event
otherwise were inferred from well- determined epicenters than for the regular relocations,
fault plane solutions of other nea rby recent and we estimate that in general the relative
events that presumably occur on th e same relocations were no more uncertain than 25 km.
tectonic features. The seismic mo ments were Sometimes observations of relative displace-
then calculated by assuming a doub le-couple ments on faults were available from field
Chen and Molnar: Seismic Moments and Slip Rate
16.
RIV
12-16-20 NJ GI
2 C I 12-16-2 E GI
12 402
12q6-2 0 El GI
12;40 ?
I WN
1-15-34 NJ
n 0, ?
2 CM
I MIN
1-15-34 Ej GI
studies of the earthquakes. In such cases we that the signal was not distorted. As was
used the estimates of moment, fault length, mentioned above, only signals for which long-
and displacement to infer the fault width. period surface waves were visible to the eye
.he principal sources of the uncertainty in were used. This minimized the possibility of
the estimation of the seismic moments are (1) Fourier analyzing only noise or nonlinearly
the assumed fault plane solutions, (2) the distorted signals.
measurements of the surface wave spectral No correction for the finiteness of the
densities, and (3) the assumption of an sources was made. For a uniform slip with
appropriate stratified earth model or the constant rupture velocity v (v3.5 km/s) along
assumption of the time function of the source a long fault the amplitude spectrum is multi-
in the theoretical calculations. For several plied by an azimuthally dependent factor
cases we explored different fault plane sin X/X, where
solutions and found that the particular choice
did not matter very much. Only for gross X = Lw(l/v - cos e/c)12
errors could this make the calculated moment in
error by as much as a factor of 2. Moreover, Here L is the fault length, e is the azimuth
the uncertainty in the average value from between the fault strike and the path to the
several different stations is likely to be station, and C is the phase velocity [e.g.,
correspondingly less than that for estimates Ben-Menahem, 1961]. Only for a limited range
from one station. of azimuths and only for the largest earth-
Errors in the measured spectral densities quakes will the spectral density be affected
arise from a possibly inaccurate knowledge of significantly by the finiteness of the sources.
the instrument responses and from imprecise For the longest faults, periods much longer
analog to digital conversion especially for than 100 s were generally used. Moreover, for
low signal-to-noise ratios. The uncertainty most events the azimuthal coverage is broad
contributed by the instrument response is enough that the finiteness of the source will
difficult to estimate but in most cases have little effect on the average moment.
probably is much less than a factor of 2. To Possibly erroneous earth models and the
minimize the errors in digitizing, digitized attenuation factors given by Ben-Menahem et al.
seismograms were plotted and overlain on [1970] are likely to be less important.
original seismograms for comparison. When The overall uncertainty of the estimates of
traces were written by pens with finite lengths, the seismic moments varies frmn event to event
after the curvature of the trace was removed, and is less for the more recent events than
the seismograms again were plotted to be sure for the older events. In extreme cases,
17.
Chen and Molnar: Seismic Moments and Slip Rate
RI RIV
R I V
7-29-47 NJ
I I-I R-5I Nt I(
I0:10 6
I R
221 1 t + I
CM-
I MIN
11-18-51 El G1
10:10 G R
.MIN
COP 11-1B-51 Ft R1
10:00 R1
61
IWN
Fig. 2c. Seismograms of Riverview and Copenhagen.
estimates from individual stations may be in 1972]. Bogdanovich et al. [1914] observed a
error by as much as a factor of 3 or 4. As clear fault scarp showing thrust sense of
estimates from several stations and at motion with vertical displacement of about 4 m
different periods are generally within this near 42.83 0 N, 77.350 E (Figure 3). This appears
range of each other, the average moment should to be the maximum displacement that they
be more precise. Although for some earthquakes observed along a zonV of destruction, with
the average estimate may still be in error by segments of surfacebreaks and landslides,
this factor, for most cases and in particular trending east-west for about 200 km.
for the largest events, we consider the Shebalin [1972] inferred a nearly east-west
estimates to be precise to within a factor of 2. trending fault about 180 km long from the
Unless there is some gross systematic distribution of the maximum intensity (X)
error in the calculations or assumptions (such isoseismal.
as an incorrect fault plane solution), we Two clear recordings of Rayleigh waves
think that the estimates are accurate to (Figure 2a) lie on paths in nearly opposite
this factor also. directions from the source. From the measured
spectral densities and a fault plane solution
Results for Individual Earthquakes inferred from solutions of more recent events
[Molnar et al., 19731 the seismic moment is
In this section we describe briefly each estimated to be 4.9 x 1027 dyn-cm (Table 1),
earthquake and the assumed fault plane which corresponds to 2.3 m of average slip
sdlutions. We then give the average slip on a 180 x 40 km 2 fault. In comparison with
based on the calculated moment and inferred the 4-m maximum vertical displacement observed
fault length, and for an arbitrarily chosen, in the field [Bogdanovich et al., 19141 this
but reasonable fault width. value is reasonable.
Event of January 3, 1911, in Kebin, Event of December 16, 1920, in Haiyuan,
0 0 0
Kirgizia, USSR (42.8 N, 77.3 E). The geologi- Kansu (36.62 N, 105.h00E). This was one of the
cal effects of the Kebin event in the Tien Shan most catastrophic events in history. After
were studied in the field both immediately their expedition, Close and McCormick [1922]
after the earthquake [Bogdanovich et al., 1914] described the epicentral zone as 'where the
and more recently [Kuchai, 1969; Shebalin, mountains walked'. Landslides accompanying the
_ 1__~ _ ___ ___ ___________1_~ __ __T _ ____ _ *_*___ ____I_ _
R, PAS 7-29-47 Z RI
, c, E GI ,.
O'
PAS 7-10-49 Z RI
E GI.G3 U,
N G3
0
So
mrDo a
tw
P AS 6-27-57
NS G2
I MIN
2 CM
NS G3
in
-- I MIN
Fig. 2e. Seismograms of Pasadena, California.
0
shock were reported to have displaced super-
ficial features such as roads and houses up to
1 mi (1.6 km) without apparent damage.
Avalanches in an area of 160 x 480 km2 caused
2 x 105 reported deaths on the loess plateau.
The maximum intensity reached XI to XII, partly
due to unusual surficial conditions
[Seismological Brigade of Lanzhou et al.,
1976]. o
Only a few aftershocks were recorded at a
small number of stations, and they cannot be
relocated accurately. Recent resurveys W
[Seismological Brigade of Lanzhou et al.,
1976] indicate a surface
0
rupture
0
200 km long
with a strike of N50 to 70 W. Some vertical
displacement near the epicenter was observed
as was left-lateral horizontal displacement, 8
which is consistent with the P wave first o
motion recorded in Tokyo.
We obtained three seismograms with
recordings of long-period surface waves from
this event (Table 1 and Figures 2b and 2i)
but unfortunately with nearly the same
azimuths. The relatively large excitation
of Love wave is consistent with a mechanism
with a large component of horizontal
displacement. If a fault plane striking
NT70OW is assumed and there is half each of
horizontal and vertical motion, the calculated
seismic moments for dips of 450 and 900
differed by only 10%. By using the 450
dipping plane the seismic moment is determined
to be Mo = 3.0 x 1028 dyn-cm, which corre-
sponds to an average slip of 10 m (about
2
7 m horizontal movement) for a 200 x 50 km
fault.
Event of May 22, 1927, in Ku-long, Kansu
0 0
(38.05 N, 102.37 E). This event occurred
approximately 300 km to the northwest of the
1920 Haiyuan shock. The area of destruction
forms an ellipse elongated in the northwest
direction with a length of 600 km, but by
comparing the intensity distribution with
that of the Haiyuan shock, we estimated the
rupture length to be about 140 kmn.
~ _ _____~__~_11_~~_ ~_~_~ _~ . __~~, ~-
-- -- ~---- -sr I
HOH 5-22-27 NI RI
23:00 RI
I MIN
1-15-34 NI
9:10R9:0 RAV
R
I MIN
RAV 1-15-34 Et? RI
910 2 IMIN
MIN'N v'
RAV 11-18-51 Nt RI
10:05
IMIN
STU 7-29-47 Nt RI
14:14 I MIN
STU 6-27-57 Nt RI
IMIN
STU 12-4-57 NT RI
R 01:05
IMIN
Fig. 2g. Seismograms of Stuttgart, Hohenheim, and Ravensburg, Germany.
Various types of surface ruptures formed. to be on the same tectonic feature as the
One 10-km-long rupture shows a vertical Haiyuan event. Thus we infer that the fault
displacement of 3 to 5 m with the north side plane solution for this event is nearly the
down [Seismological Committee of the Academia same as that for the 1920 Haiyuan earthquake.
Sinica, 19561. In the resurvey report of the The moment estimated from recordings at
Haiyuan event [Seismological Brigade of three stations (Figures 2g and 2h) is 4.3 x
Lanzhou et al., 1976] this shock was considered 1027 dyn-cm, which corresponds to an 2
average slip of 2.4 m for a 150 x 40 km faul t.
Event of August 10, 1931, in Fuh-Yun,
Sinkiang (46.890N, 90.060 E). Little
TN RI information is available for this earthquake,
3:00 R j probably because of the low population density
near the epicentral zone. The Seismological
Committee of the Academia Sinica [19561
2 described high intensities (XI) and a surface
rupture 300 km long extending approximately
I min north-south. The epicenter lies near a north-
northwest striking fault that is inferred from
GTT 5-22-27 an interpretation of Landsat photographs to be
mostly strike-slip [Molnar and Tapponnier,
1975]. This inference is consistent with the
IE RI fact that surface wave observations show larger
Love waves than Rayleigh waves (Table 1 and
23;00 R
Figures 2c and 2i). Among the three stations
used, especially large amplitudes for Love
waves were recorded at Seven Falls (SFA)
I mAn l [Brune and Engen, 1969], to which the path
makes an azimuth of about 80 from the assumed
fault strike.
With station azimuth coverage from three
stations of only about 400 the moment is
LPZ determined to be 8.5 x 1021 dyn-cm, which
5-22-27 El GI
23:39? corresponds to an averaje displacement of
acut J , ',
1.9 m for a 50 x 300 km fault or 3.8 m for a
25 x 300 km 2 fault.
G R Event of January 15, 1934, in Bihar-Nepal
I MIN (27.550 N, 87.090E). Isoseismals of maximum
intensity X (Mercalli) extended in a west-
Fig. 2h. Seismograms of Gttingen, Germany, northwest direction from the epicenter, with
and La Paz (San Calixto), Bolivia. a total length of 130 km and a width of 30 km
21.
Chen and Molnar: Seismic Moments and Slip Rate
UPP 12-16-20 N G2
iS: 10
I MIN
I MIN
UPP 7-10-49 E RI
04:12 R
UPP 6-27 - 57 N RI
00:31 R
2 CM f )
I MIN
UPP 12-4-57 E RI
04::0
I MIN
[Dunn et al., 1939]. This field survey also along a west-northwest striking fault from the
showed a 'slump belt' of 300-km length trending intensity observations. Fault plane solutions
in the same direction. Within the belt, of more recent earthquakes in this region,
tilting or destruction of buildings, emission however, show low-angle thrust faulting
of sand and water from the ground, and various [e.g., Fitch, 1970; Molnar et al., 1973], and
fissures were widely observed. Dunn et al. we assume a mechanism of this type.
[1939] inferred a strike-slip sense of motion Note that datum for station Victoria (VIC)
Chen and Molnar: Seismic Moments and Slip Rate 22.
Fig. 3. Fault scarp of the 1911 Kebin earthquake near 42.83 0 W, 77.330 E looking
towards north-northwest (reproduced from Bogdanovich et al. [1914]).
is the amplitude of ground displacement from Event of July 10, 1949, in Khait,
Brune and King [19671. The seismic moment Tajikistan, USSR (39.270 N, 70.59 0 E). This
from it is evaluated by using another set of event occurred on the Hissaro-Kokhshal fault
tables by Ben-Menahem et al. [1970]. As this zone along the border of the southern Tien Shan
amplitude of ground motion depends on the [e.g., Gubin, 1960, 1967]. Field observations
slope of the group velocity dispersion curve indicated a shallow long source with a
explicitly, the structure along the ray path considerable amount of vertical motion during
is more important than it is when spectral the earthquake [Gubin, 1960, 1967]. Isoseis-
densities are used. The average seismic mals of maximum intensity (X) extend 65 to 70
moment from five measurements at three km in an east-west direction.
stations is 1.1 x 1028 dyn-cm, which corre- Gubin [1960, 1967] inferred that the
sponds to an average slip of 5.4 m for a 130 x faulting was reverse on a nearly vertical
50 km 2 fault. plane dipping slightly to the south. Unfor-
Event of July 29, 1947T in the eastern tunately, P wave first motions do not uniquely
malaya (28.63"N, 93.730 E). Little define a single set of nodal planes [Wickens
information is available for this event, which and Hodgson, 1967] but are consistent with
occurred near the eastern end of the Himalaya, this solution. The calculated seismic moment
and few aftershocks are reported in the ISS. from two stations is not well determined. Its
Thus we cannot estimate the fault dimensions. value of 2.4 x 1027 dyn-cm corresponds to an
Fault plane solutions of three more recent average slip of 3.7 m for a 70 x 30 km 2 fault.
earthquakes which occurred within 100 km of Event of August 15,l 1950, in Assam, India
this epicenter show east-west trending nearly (28.38 0 N, 96.76 0 E). This event was studied
vertical dipping nodal planes and poorly extensively by Ben-Menahem et al. [1974], using
ccnstrained but shallow dipping nodal planes Rayleigh to Love wave and R2/R 3 amplitude
[Fitch, 1970; Molnar et al., 1973]. We assume ratios at Pasadena (PAS), the P/PP amplitude
shallow angle thrust faulting to the north. ratio at Tokyo (TKY), and surface wave spectral
The average seismic moment-from five measure- densities and ground amplitudesat PAS, TKY,
ments at three stations is 9.8 x 1026 dyn-m. and Bergen. They concluded that a fault
Chen and Molnar: Seismic Moments and Slip Rate
0
0
oO
0 0
0
0
00
o
0 0 00o 0
o o o
29N o o o
a o o oo o
oo
o
o o o o
0 0 o 0 MAIN SI OCK
0 0 cj
o+ 00-
0 O 28"N
0
oW 00
0 0"
0
o 0
00 0
0
2 7 00 OCO
ON 0e
0 0
0
26" N
94 E 96 98
31 N
46
BOON
* TS GAAN
* NUU
- - ' ."
I _.---.. ,BARUUI - "
-q N"SHOCK TARYATIJ
. -, , - ' MAI ' NARIYN'..
. \ \:ul .Y AN , , 4<-
- 'x ~----NN
OYAN HARUUL\\
45N " ' "LAKE ,
- .- L K OROQ:NUUR
'-
' Uv:4.0Om U= 1.5 Mf', TO R--.R-
U1I. 5 m U =2.0m " KHE BAGA
S BOGDO \ BOGO
'Uh8.85m . -, 0--
o
%N ARTS BOGO
I44 ( - C+
C'J
0
Chen and Molnar: Seismic Moments and Slip Rate 27.
ARE
Mo:3.8 x 106
2
DYNE-CM
Fig. 8. Observed and calculated spectral densities of G2 and G3 waves normalized to
the source for the Mogod earthquake. Theoretical spectral density is calculated
for the average moment 3.8 x 1026 dyn-cm.
tion of right-lateral strike-slip and normal an average slip of 4.5 m on a 35 x 30 km2 fault,
faulting on a plane dipping 45 0N with the strike in reasonable agreement with that from the
constrained by the aftershock distribution. field observations.
The seismic moment calculated from eight Event of December 4, 1957, in Gobi-Altai,
measurements at four stations is 4.6 x 1027 Mongolia (45.310 N, 99.210 E). The 1957 Gobi-
dyn-cm. Altai event occurred on the Bogdo fault of
Event of June 27, 1957, in Muya, Siberia southern Mongolia. The fault plane solution
(56.200N. 116.590E). The Muya earthquake is quite well constrained (work of L. M.
was one of the largest known events in the Balakina in the work of Florensov and Solonenko
Baikal Rift system. Field studies [Solonenko, [1963] and shows a combination of overthrust
1965; Solonenko et al., 1966] indicate a and strike-slip motion. This solutiou is
component of left-lateral strike-slip faulting consistent with the observed surface faulting
(-1.5 m) and primarily normal faulting with as reported by Florensov and Solonenko [1963]
much as 5 to 6 m of dip-slip at one site on a and is summarized in Figure 7. The epicentral
35-km-long fault. The pattern of deformation zone has a surface break at least 270 km long,
is complex, and the average slip might have and the maximum horizontal displacement
been less than 5 m. The trend of the zone of reaches 8.85 m at one site. This earthquake
surface deformation is nearly east-west. P also caused relative motion on other nearby
wave first motion data agree with a solution (as far as 30 km away) tectonic features (e.g.,
with normal and left-lateral strike-slip motion the Tormkhon overthrust). Relocated epicenters
on a plane striking east-southeast [Vvedenskaya, of the 23 largest aftershocks relative to the
1960; Wickens and Hodgson, 1967]. main shock clearly follow the general trend of
Clear dispersed wave trains of G2 and G 3 the surface break, and most of the aftershocks
with periods up to 100s or more are recorded at cluster in a zone of 300 km long (Figure 7).
Pasadena (Figure 2e) and are consistent with Ben-Menahem and Toksiz [1962] studied this
the assumed fault azimuth and the 2xistence of event, using the Rayleigh wave directivity
strike-slip motion. at PAS and inferred a fault length of 560 km.
The average seismic moment from three Later, Okal [19761 constructed synthetic
stations of 1.4 x 1027 dyn-cm corresponds to seismograms of the Love waves at PAS and found
Chen and Molnar: Seismic Moments and Slip Rate
23.
T 2'
27 /
/ I
STRAIN ELLIPSE
, 05
REPRESENTATION QUADRIC
1911- 1967 (BM)
Assumed
Seismic Moment,
Date Latitude Longitude Location M Assumed Source Parameters dyn-cm
June 12, 1897 26 0 N 910 E Assam, Himalayas 8.7 Same as those for 1934 Bihar-Nepal 4 x 1028
event
Aug. 22, 1902 40N 770 E Pamir 8.6 Same as those for 1949 Khait event 3 x 1028
0 0
April 4, 1905 33 N 76 E Kangra, 8.6 Same as those for 1934 Bihar-Nepal 3 x 1028
Himalayas event
28
July 9, 1905
0
49 N
0
99 E Khangai, Mongolia 8.4 N60 0 E striking, vertical strike-slip 3 x 1028
fault
July 23, 1905 49 0 N 980 E Khangai, Mongolia 8.7 East-vest striking vertical strike- 5 x 1028
slip fault
1020 dyn-cm.
%6-27-1957
< In our case, the dimensions of the deformed
volume in both north-south and east-west
directions are about 3000 km (Figure 1).
Assuming a thickness of 40 km for the upper
part of the lithosphere where brittle
deformation can occur, we have an average slip
rate due to strain of 15 mm/yr for the time I I I I
span of 1911 to 1967 or 13 mm/yr for 1911 to 7 7Y2 e sY 9
1976 in comparison with the relative conver- Magnitude
gence rate of about 50 mm/yr between Indian Fig. 10. Magnitudes versus seismic moments
and Eurasian plates[Le Pichon, 1968; Minster for events studied here (pluses). Circles
et al., 1974]. (x) represent assumed seismic moments for
Diagonalizing Mij, we obtain events from 1862 to 1907.
9.4 0 o0
j (2dV) = 0 -8.8 0o x 10 28 dyn-cm (5a) earthquakes probably increases the calculated
0 0 -o.6 values of EMij or Tij by only 40% or less.
Effect of incorrect fault plane solutions.
The assumed fault plane solutions contribute
or to the uncertainties in the estimation of slip
rate both directly and indirectly through
4.4 0 0 their effect on the estimates of seismic
ij= 0 -4.1 j x 10-7 (5b)
3
moments. The Assam earthquake of 1950, which
has the highest seismic moment of all the
0 -0. V = 40 x 3000 x 3000 km
events studied (Table 1) and for which the
with the corresponding principal directions assumed slip vector is nearly horizontal,
shown in Figure 9. The horizontal cross contributes nearly 50% of the total slip from
section of the representation quadric (Figure 1911 to 1967 along the north-south direction.
9) shows that the calculated average strain Although the slip vector differs slightly for
caused by seismic slip in central Asia is near- the two possible fault plane solutions (Table
ly north-south compressional. In addition to 1) and the corresponding moments differ by a
uplift and crustal thickening, some east-west factor of 2, the slip rate in the north-south
extension also exists. direction remains essentially unchanged. The
Effect of small earthquakes.. The values calculated vertical and east-west stretching
calculated here include the contributions of depend very much on which fault plane solution
only the largest events. The contribution is assumed. If we assume that only shallow
of smaller events can be estimated by using angle underthrusting occurred with no component
frequency-magnitude and magnitude-moment of strike-slip motion, then the vertical
relations. If we assume that b = 1 in the expansion is increased by 70%, but there is
frequency-magnitude relation (log N = a - bM) no calculated east-west stretching. This
and a magnitude-moment relation, calculation probably shows the largest possible
effect of an erroneous fault plane solution.
log Mo = 1.5 Ms + 16.0 (6) Effect of nonstationarity of seismicity.
Clearly, the recurrence rate of very large
from Aki 11972] on the basis of the w-1 model shocks has a large effect on the estimated
of Brune and King [1967] for Ms > 5.0, the average slip rate, and perhaps the level of
total moment for events with magnitude ranging seismicity during the last 66 years is not
from 5.0 to 7.6 is about 37% of that for events representative of a longer time average. In
with magnitudes ranging from 7.6 to 8.7 studied fact, Richter [1958] listed seven major shocks
here. By further assuming that for smaller in this area between 1897 and 1907, and two
events the magnitude-moment relation has a others in 1862 and 1889, are clearly comparable
slope of 1, the total moment for events with in magnitude to those studied here (Figure 1
magnitudes ranging from 3.0 to 5 is about 5% and Table 2). The two 1905 Mongolian earth-
of that for events with magnitudes from 7.6 to quakes were studied by Okal [1977] and moments
8.7. These percentages are doubled or halved calculated by him agree well with the displace-
if b = 1.2 or 0.8, respectively. There is a ments and lengths of surface faults observed
suggestion that b is somewhat lower in Asia by A. V. Voznesenskii (cited by Florensov and
than it is elsewhere [Molnar et al., 1973; Solonenko [1963])and more recently by N. A.
Sykes, 1970], so that the effect of smaller Florensov, S. D. Hilko, and others. The July
31.
Chen and Molnar: Seismic Moments and Slip Rate
AAE - AAM -
-A- BKS
STU I min
13 Nov 1965
P
P P
I min
ATU COL
TAB
1 2 June 1973
pP
Fig. 11. Long-period vertical component seismograms of the WWSSN showing pP
arrivals of two selected events with focal depths of approximately 45 and
30 km, respectively. Relevant information on those readings is given in
Table 3.
23, 1905, event appears to have caused no less moment relation for the Asian events discussed
than 2.5 m of left-lateral slip as well as an above (Figure 10). Fault plane solutions are
unknown component of reverse faulting on a assumed to be the same as for adjacent events
370 km-long east-west fault. The July 9, 1905, studied in the previous section.
event seems to have ruptured a shorter fault, If a 40-km-thick layer is assumed, the
0
striking about N60 E with a complicated calculated slip rate, averaged from 1862 to
pattern of deformation (S. D. Hilko, personal 1967, is 23mm/yr in the north-south direction
communications, 1974, 1975). in comparison with 15 mm/yr for 1911 to 1967.
The geological effects of the 1862 Proval As Davies and Brune 11971] suggested that the
Bay event on Lake Baikal appear to be seismicity in around 1900 in this area was
comparable or perhaps larger than those of the particularly high, the difference between the
Muya event [Solonenko, 1968]. A large bay rates that include and exclude these earlier
formed when part of the Selenga River delta data gives an estimate of the uncertainty in
dropped relative to the lake level. (Proval the calculated rates due to the nonstationarity
translates from Russian to 'gap' or 'sink'.) of the seismicity. When averaging over 1862
The intensity distribution from the 1889 Chilik to 1967 the contribution from the Assam event
earthquake ,[Mushketov, 1891] is comparable in is relatively small, but the pattern of
maximum intensity and area to that of the 1911 deformation remains essentially north-south
Kebin earthquake [Bogdanovich et al., 1914], compressional, the smaller extension being in
and we assume that they have the same moment. the east-west and vertical directions. In the
Seismic moments for the remaining events are absence of other information we tentatively
estimated approximately from the magnitude- assume that the effect of the nonstationarity
Chen and Molnar: Seismic Moments and Slip Rate
rate do not allow for an accurate estimate of Bogdanovich, K. I., I. M. Kark, B. Ya.
this fraction or, alternatively, of the Korolkov, and D. I. Mushketov, The earth-
thickness of the brittle zone. Nevertheless, quake in the northern part of the Tien Shan
this fraction of the relative convergence is of 22 Dec. 1910 (4 Jan. 1911) (in Russian),
much larger than that in Iran, where most of Trans. Geol. Comm., 89, 1-270, 1914.
the convergence seems to occur by fault creep Brune, J. N., and C. R. Allen, A low-stress
[North, 1974], and it is consistent with the drop, low-magnitude earthquake with
inference that brittle deformation extends surface faulting, The Imperial, California,
to 40-km depth in much of Asia. earthquake of March 4, 1966, Bull. Seismol.
Soc. Amer., 57, 501-514, 1967.
Acknowledgments. We benefited from Brune,J., and G. R. Engen, Excitation of
numerous discussions with P. Tapponnier. We mantle Love waves and definition of mantle
thank J. Filson and R. North for assistance wave magnitude, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Amer.,
in computations, G. Stewart for pointing out 59, 923-933, 1969.
an error in one of the moment determinations, Brune, J. N., and C. Y. King, Excitation of
and D. McKenzie for pointing out that Kostrov's mantle Rayleigh waves of period 100 seconds
method ignores rotational strain. We also as a function of magnitude, Bull. Seismol.
thank M. Bath, J. Brune, R. Cabre, L. A. Soc. Amer., 57, 1355-1365, 1967.
Drake, S. Gregerson, J. B. Minster, E. A. Okal, Close, U., and E. McCormick, Where the
G. Schneider, J. H. Whitcomb, and H. Wilhelm mountains walked, Nat. Geogr. Mag., 41,
for providing the records and instrument 445-464, 1922.
response information used in this study. Davies, G., and J. N. Brune, Regional and
S. D. Hilko, V. I. Kuchai, N. V. Shebalin, and global slip rates from seismicity, Nature
V. P. Solonenko gave us valuable information Phys. Sci., 229, 101-107, 1971.
about surface faulting and intensity distri- Dewey, J. F., and K. C. Burke, Tibetan,
butions for some of the earthquakes studied. Variscan and Precambrian basement reactiva-
The reading of obscure publications was done tion: Products of continental collision, J.
while Molnar was a guest of the Academy of Geol., 81,81,
683-692, 1973.
Sciences of the USSR through exchange with Duda, S. J., Secular seismic energy release in
the U.S. National Academy of Sciences and the Circum-Pacific belt, Tectonophysics,
through exchange in earthquake prediction. 2, 409-452, 1965.
Thanks are due to numerous individuals who Dunn, J. A., J. B. Auden, A. M. N. Ghosh, and
helped during these exchanges. We appreciate D. N. Wadia, The Bihar-Nepal earthquake of
the critical comments of W. Pennington and an 1934, chaps. 2, 3, 5, India Geol. Surv. Mem.
anonymous referee. This research was 73, 1939.
supported primarily by National Science Fitch, T. J., Earthquake mechanisms in the
Foundation grant 74-02550EAR. Himalayan, Burmese, and Andaman regions and
continental tectonics in central Asia, J.
References Geophys. Res., 75, 2699-2709, 1970.
Florensov, N. A., and V. P. Solonenko, (Eds.),
Aki, K., Generation and propagation of G waves The Gobi-Altai Earthquake, chaps. 10, 12,
from the Niigata earthquake of June 16, Siberian Department of Academy of Science,
1964, 2, Estimation of earthquake moment, Moscow, 1963, (English Translation, U.S.
released energy, and stress-strain drop Department-of Commerce, Washington, D. C.,
from G wave spectrum, Bull. Earthquake 1965.)
Res. Inst. Tokyo, 44, 73-88, 1966. Gilbert, F., Excitation of the normal modes of
Aki, K., Scaling law of earthquake source time the earth by earthquake sources, Geophys.
function, Geophys. J. Roy. Astron. Soc., J. Roy. Astron. Soc., 22, 223-226, 1970.
31, 3-25, 1972. Gubin, I. E., Regularities of Seismic Activity
Armbruster, J., L. Seeber, and K. H. Jacob, in the Territory of Tajikistan, pp. 279-303,
The northwestern termination of the Academy of Sciences Publishing House,
Himalayan mountain front: Active tectonics Moscow, 1960.
from microearthquakes, J. Geophys. Res., Gubin, I. E., Lecture notes on basic problems
in press, 1977. in seismotectonics, pp. 67-68, Int. Inst. of
Ben-Menahem, A., Radiation of seismic surface Seismol. and Earthquake Eng., Tokyo, Japan,
waves from finite moving sources, Bull. 1967.
Seismol. Soc. Amer., 51, 401-435, 1961. Gutenberg, B., and C. F. Richter, Seismicity
Ben-Menahem, A., and M. N. Toksoz, Source of the Earth and Associated Phenomena, pp.
mechanism from spectra of long-period 133-150, Hafner, New York, 1954.
seismic surface waves, 1, The Mongolian Kostrov, V. V., Seismic moment and energy of
earthquake of December 4, 1957, J. Geophys. earthquakes, and seismic flow of rock,
Res., 67, 1953-1955, 1962. Izv. Acad. Sci. USSR, Phys. Solid Earth,
Ben-Menahem, A., M. Rosenman, and D. G. 1, 23-44, 1974.
Harkrider, Fast evaluation of source Kuchai, V. I., Results of repeated examination
parameters from isolated surface-wave of the remaining deformation in the
signals, 1, Universal tables, Bull. Seismol. pleistoseist of the Kebin earthquake (in
Soc. Amer., 60, 1337-1387, 1970. Russian), Geol. Geophys., 101-108, 1969.
Ben-Menahem, A., E. Aboudi, and R. Schild, The Le Pichon, X., Sea floor spreading and continen-
source of the great Assam earthquake - An tal drift, J. Geophys. Res., 73, 3661-3697,
interplate wedge motion, rhys. Earth Planet. 1968.
Interiors, 2, 265-289, 1974. . . Minster, J. B., T. H. Jordan, P. Molnar, and
Chen and Molnar: Seismic Moments and Slip Rate 34.
CHAPTER III
36.
Cambridge, MA 02139
37.
Abstract
above.
geotherm and thus lower the required mantle heat flow. Thus
calculations.
40.
INTRODUCTION
et al., 1973, 1977]. The Altyn Tagh and the Kun-Lun left-lateral
Similar rock types have also been reported along the southern
part of Tibet [Chang and Cheng, 1973; Hennig, 1915; Kidd, 1975].
[Bird, 1976; Bird and Toks6z, 1977; Chun and Yoshii, 1977;
42.
Patton, 1978; Tung and Teng, 1974; Tseng and Sung, 1963].
seismic phases.
was not thick before the collision between India and Eurasia
the plateau. Dewey and Burke [1973], Toks~z and Bird [1977]
1924; Powell and Conaghan, 1973, 1975] inferred that low angle
hot and light. Part of the high elevation but not the crustal
a) Dispersion Curves
just south of the Himalaya (Table I). More than 80% of each
of the great circle paths is within the plateau. We chose
multi-pathing was apparent (Fig. 2). For only two paths were
frequency.
46.
here also differ from one another by from 5 to 10% (Fig. 3b).
No clear Love wave with period longer than 70 sec was observed.
method:
47.
at short periods.
43.
time function.
b) Velocity Models
Resolving power of data and assumptions in models:
125 km. With both the fundamental and the first higher mode
errors.
structures.
and density structure for all models are the same as Gutenberg's
sedimentary layer, are included and the mantle between the Moho
short period range (<30 sec) does not constrain the crustal
only the model with the lowest value of m (4.4 km/s, model F4)
of the crust is less than 55 km, , must be lower than 4.4 km/s.
phase velocities for the I-NDI path well and were within
Sm > 4.8 km/s, however, the phase velocity data cannot rule
out a crustal thickness of 85 km.
low velocity layer and the Moho will not fit the data either
the crust of less than 3.5 km/sec is consistent with the data
crustal thickness.
55.
JZ).
shear wave velocity is low (<3.5 km/s). The data also seem to
sediments. Our data do not require a low velocity zone in the crust
[cf. Chun and Yoshii, 1977]. The crustal thickness and
waves other than the fact that there must exist a substantial
in Fig. 13a. The one marked 'normal Q' was generated with
coda of the S wave and the 20 sec period Rayleigh wave are
observational errors.
Aki, 1970].
PL PHASE SYNTHESIS
We observed one very clear PL phase that crossed Tibet
PL observations alone.
Next, we examined a series of multi-layered models similar
layer. A top low velocity layer has a small effect on the long
period character of the synthetic seismograms. From a series
Only rays reflected between the free surface and the interfaces
including and above the Moho were used. Fig. 14c shows one
G2.
effect on the long-period wave form (compare Figs. 14c and 14b).
better than the single layered crust cases. Other models were
from that of model SE, and with a modified model S7 with a linear
zone in the crust preferred by Chun and Yoshii [1977], does not
much.
63.
REFRACTION PROFILES
at a single station.
r, zp, h and v are the radius of the earth, the depth of the
+ r Ai p
-1] = (3)
t i - [(Api + T.)
1 ip3)
p
64.
focal depth and the origin time, together with a small error
velocity.
the dashed line in Fig. 15. A low Pn velocity will not fit
km/s for the depth corrected case (Fig. 16b). This is the
100 of Lhasa (Fig. 17). Despite the scatter, the same estimate
Sn across the Tibet and the Himalaya: There are also 23 sharp
were reported for distances greater than 100) After the depth
fit the data well (Fig. 18). The 11 sharp arrivals for events
(-300 km).
times were measured only for S wave signals that are clear
residuals.
the Himalaya (Fig. 23) and observed smaller S-P travel time
will have nearly identical paths except near the source region.
Thus we infer that the large S-P travel time delays for
ray paths.
focal depth and the origin time for events located teleseismically.
for the large S-P travel time delays for earthquakes in Tibet,
III).
Thus the average S-P travel times are late for events
S wave travel time. These lower bounds on the S-P travel time
beneath Tibet.
SEISMIC WAVE VELOCITY STRUCTURE
structures by itself.
cannot account for the difference between the data from Tibet
observed average S-P travel time delay of 3.6 sec with respect
then the average shear wave velocity beneath Tibet must still
the average shear wave velocity of about 4.3 km/s between 100
quoted above.
TECTONIC IMPLICATIONS
the Indian crust plunged into the mantle and then migrated,
probably as a melt, up to the base of Tibet's crust. In
Tibet and shields were only +0.05 km/sec. Thus this suggested
difference in temperature is only a crude estimate, not a
precise measurement.
(0.80 + 0.05 HFU, [Lachenbruch and Sass, 1976]) and the Indian
shield (0.93 HFU, [Rao et al., 1976]), the mantle heat flow
number is very large, our point is that the high Pn and Sn.
the lower crust and upper mantle. One can estimate the
assuming that the flow laws for steady state creep of olivine
For differential stress (c1 -c 3 ) less than 2 kb, the flow law
flow laws for Mt. Burnet dunite. Using his 'dry' flow low
Fig. 25 shows solidi for some likely crustal and upper mantle
1975]. None of the data have error bars and therefore can
assumptions:
1. A constant mantle heat flux (Qh) is held at the base
of the crust.
2. The thickening of the crust is instantaneous and
heat flow (Qs) and surface heat production rate (Ao ) is valid.
1978].
(K) = 0.01 cm2 /sec. Note that Tm can be scaled to any desired
but took place in four steps 10 m.y. apart, by using Fig. Al(a)
0
we find that Tm = 800 0 C after 42 m.y. if Tm0 = 500 C or after
not 4 TRo as is the case when doubling of the crust also doubles
and probably in the earth also, the source of heat is far from
The steady state final heat flow at the surface would be only
1.25 HFU for the former case and 2.25 HFU for the latter.
Since heat flow measurements are not available for Tibet,
from the recovery of the geotherm provided that the heat flux
from the mantle is greater than about 0.9 HFU without any
86.
in the crust (to produce 0.5 HFU) after the crustal thickening.
CONCLUSIONS
synthesis.
Acknowledgements
and P. Tapponnier.
References
1969.
Bird, P., Thermal and mechanical evolution of continental
Bird, P., M.N. Toksiz, and N.H. Sleep, Thermal and mechanical
1970.
1963.
5279-5291, 1962.
1647-1654, 1977.
65 pp., 1940.
5011-5027, 1970.
245-258, 1977.
1978.
1970.
Paris, 1977.
Molnar, P., T.J. Fitch, and F.T. Wu, Fault plane solutions of
419-426, 1975.
1978.
Norin, E., Geological Explorations in Western Tibet, Reports
1978.
1976.
98.
Tapponnier, P., and J. Francheteau, Necking of the lithosphere
1447-1462, 1970.
5729-5743, 1970.
1974.
Table I
Hypocenters and origin times as reported by ISC after 1964, by the Coastal
and Geodetic Survey before 1964.
Table II
Pn and Sn velocity estimates for Tibet (north of the suture) and regions south of the suture
Travel time (sec) =
Epicentral Distance No. of Distance (km)/velocity (km/s)
(deg.) Range Arrivals Observations + Intercept time (sec)
Results after the depth correction are given on the second line.
All velocities are calculated for a Moho at 70 km depth.
Table III
S-P travel time residuals with respect to the Jeffreys-Bullen Table for earthquakes
in Tibet (T) and the Himalaya (H)
Ave. 3.6
4.5
Table III (cont'd)
Ave.
2.0
Results after applying the station corrections are given
on the second line for each event. 2.6
103.
Figure Captions
same as in Fig. 5.
103.
ranges from 3.49 km/s to 3.44 km/s. The model FF3 which
S7, Fig. 6) fit the data at both long period and short
dashed line shows the slope of a curve that the data would
108.
Fig. 16. (a) Plots of data for Pn travel times without depth
Fig. 19. Map of Tibet showing the location of LHA and the
Fig. 20. Map of Tibet and the Himalaya showing the locations
in sec with respect to the J-B table for the source depths
errors.
original literature.
4 4
L316 64(M) F-
8-30-72(M[),(=I) (
IO-I4-66(Ml) 4-19-63( I)
- "3-24-71(ZI
/ ,ET 8-3o-67M)
800 90 I1000
Fig. 1
112.
E-W
Apr 19, 63
NOI
- PL-
07= 39
SMin
15 51
r* 1
I Mmn
LR
LR
01: 13
I Min
I
Min
N-S
E-W
01 19 LR
I Min
18: 56 LR
18: 56 LG
Fig. 2 (b)
I Min
U(km/sec)
3.70
Rayleigh Wave A AA A
I-NDI
L..A
3.50 H-
LIr-SHL
3.20 --
IE- NDI
3.00 E-Lctoo
fta
6A
ZE-NDI
anoo
X
X
o
o
Xx Fig. 3(a)
-J-NDI
U(km /sec)
3.70
Love Wave
* .6-M'- NDI
MEE-NDI-----x *
'3.30 * x
0 0 0 40 00
0
C) AoA A oo5 * "I-LAH
*x A 0 0ii
0
fl.
.
(D A
A A
3.001E- A
A A M-1 NIL
2.70 IL L1111111
111111 I
10.0 11.2 12.5 14.0 157 17.5 19.6 22.0 24.6 275 307 34.4 385 43.1 48.2 53.9 63.8
10.6 11.8 13.2 14.8 16.6 18.5 20.8 23.2 26.0 291 32.5 364 407 45.6 51.0 57 67.5
T(sec)
Fig. 3 (b)
74 I
_ ___ ___ I ___
6 6
4.1r- x NDI
o SHL
T(SEC)
Fig. 4
I _C~P_~
U (km /sec)
3.70 - xxx
* xxxx
w
x A X
o
U
A A A A
3.50 -
X o A
a
x
*x^
3.30 --
Love Wave m .
U *
Gm
,,x
AD G F4= (FF3) 4.4
R o
ER
a F5 4.5
x F7 47
3.00 - Rayleigh Wave
55km Crust
ft
x Fig. 5
x x
2.70 - I I I I I
I I I I II 1 I I I I I I I I I I I1 11
I0 12 14 IE 18 22 26 30 34 38 42 48 54 60 66 72 78 8490
20 24 28 32 36 39 45 51 57 63 69 75 81 87
T(sec)
J I a a
$(km/sec)
25 30 35 40 4.5 50
20-
30 -
40 -
50 - 55km Crust
60-
70 - F4 44 o
80 - F5 45 "
90 -
F7 -- 47 X
100
too
120 -
130 -
140 -
Depth (kin)
Fig. 5
(cont.)
4 4
U(km/sec)
3.70 -
-- AVA Z A V V
AV 0
VA 0 O
X
A 00 X
35A O xoXx
AO
x
x
A
OX X
ox
oX
0 Am
CX
0 x S4 4.4
3.0 o S7 (SS5) 47
x
X0
x x0
xxx
0
x 70 km Crust
00 A
A oA
2.70 - I I I I II I il ii ii II ~ l I ~ lI I I
10 12 14 16 18 22 26 30 34 38 42 48 54 60 66 727884 90
20 24 28 32 36 39 45 51 57 63 69 75 81 87
T (sec)
Fig. 6
----------
3( km/sec)
25 30
I0 -
20 -
30 -
40-
50 -
70 km Crust
60- )GM
70 - S4 - 44 X
80 -
90 -
100 -
S7(=SS5)
S8 --
47
48
o
A
_11711
110 -
20 -
130 -
140 -
Depth (kin)
Fig. 6
(cont.)
U(km/sec)
3701
V0 0
V 0 X
V x oX
0
X A
V oX A
3.50 -
0
A ^x^ A
o
3.30 - 0
o P
E7 4.7
A E8 x 4.8
E9 o 4.9
Rayleigh Wave
3.00 I-
x x
85km Crust
0
00 X 0
2.70 St I I I I I III I I I I I I I I I I I I I I II LL
10 12 14 16 18 22 26 30 34 38 42 48 54 60 66 72 78 8490
20 24 28 32 36 39 45 51 57 63 69 75 8187
T(sec)
Fig. 7
/ (km/sec)
30 35
85 km Crust
Bm
-x-x E4 4.4
- E7 47 A
E8 48 X
E9 49 o
I:1
I__j__J
! '
Depth (km)
Fig. 7
(cont.)
~
-- ~ --
U(km/sec)
3.70 -
xCX4C '
F4
(55k m) x o
- - --
S4 o
(70 km) o A (85km)
3.30
<0) x 0 E4
0. S o
X
x
0 A 0
0oo
A Fig. 8
2.70 - I I I I I I I I
I I II I I I I I 1 1 I .I I I I I
10 12 14 16 18 22 26 30 34 38 42 48 54 60 66 72 78 84 90
20 24 28 32 36 39 45 51 57 63 69 75 81 87
T (sec)
U(km /sec)
3.70 x
xx
xxxxxx
X v
X v 'o 0
X ' o
0
x o
00
o0
Royleigh Wave
3.50 - 0 A a A
(55km)F7x
(70 km)S7
3.20 -
3.00 1-
0 0 m =4.7
x 0
0 x x
-- x 0
0
x Fig.
x o
0 0
x
2.70 I I 1 I I I I I I I I I rl I I I I I I I I I I I1 1 111
10 12 14 16 18 22 26 30 34 38 41 48 54 60 66 72 78 84 90
20 24 28 32 36 39 45 51 57 63 69 75 8187
T (sec)
U(km/sec)
3.70 k
Royleigh Wave 0
v00
A0
0v
b
00 A
3.50 - AA
A
0
A A
0 A
3.30 - S8 o A (85km)
(70 km)
E8
0 A
A
0
A
3.00 --
6
0 A 0 A Rm =4.8
0
0 Fig. 10
0 0 0
2.70 iiIIIlI~tI1
I III I I .I~ . . II . . . Iti~lll
.1
. .
10 12 14 16 18 22 26 30 34 38 42 48 54 60 66 72 788490
20 24 28 32 36 39 45 51 57 63 69 75 81 87
T(sec)
_ ___ __
U(km /sec)
3.70 -
Rayleigh Wave Y
3.50 H- /) A A A A
/ A FF1 -
FFI
ix FF2-----o
FF3 --- x
3.30 -
55km Crust
a ,m = 4.4
3.00 -
A A A A A
A A A A
A A
2.70 I
I I I II II
I I
I I
I I
I I I II lI . . .. . . . . .
10 12 14 16 18 22 26 30 34 38 42 48 54 60 66 72 78 84 90
20 24 28 32 36 39 45 51 57 63 69 75 81 87
T(sec)
Fig. 11(a)
___ --
~--e --- ----- -----------_--_,~-~F
3 (km/sec)
5 3.5 4.5 5.0
I0
FFI 349
FF2 348
20- FF3 344 55 km Crust
/m =4.4
30-
40-
I!
oil
60 L
Fig. 11(a)
(cont.)
U(km/sec)
3.70
Rayleigh Wave
i y f gig'
Ia
3.50 - AA
A FF4 o
FF5 o
FF6 &
" 3.30 FF7 x
0
M
55km Crust
O
0 V 0O
3.00 - 4 o
V
0 ,am= 4.4
0
ax
A X
a
A A A 0 0
&xA
2.70
I I I_ II_ I I I I I I II I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
10 12 14 16 18 22 26 30 34 38 42 48 54 60 66 72 78 8490
20 24 28 32 36 39 45 51 57 63 69 75 8187
T(sec)
Fig. 11 (b)
4_A
. 4
S(km/sec)
2.5 5.0
I i I i
10- FF4 o0
FF5 -------
3.4 4 *
FF6
20- 55 km Crust
FF7 -
ii:
Sm= 4.4
E - 30
-.
CL 40 - 1
x
I' K
50
60
Fig. 11 (b)
(cont.)
U(km/sec)
3.70
Rayleigh Wave
3.50 H
SSI -o
3.20 H SS2- .
SS3 --. o
3.00 H
, 70 km Crust
S- -- -, ,m 4.7
2.70 I I I I It It I I I I I I I I I I I I I I lll
10 12 14 16 18 22 26 30 34 38 42 48 54 60 66 72 78 84 90
20 24 28 32 36 39 45 51 57 63 69 75 81 87
T(sec)
Fic. 12 (a)
'--~-- '-~---I 1 ~--11~1
3(km/sec)
5.0
2.5 1
I
10 - SSI - 3.53 o
SS2 -------- 3.48
I.
SS3 ---- 345 C
20-
30-
40-
i __
50-
60-
70 km Crust I
70-
Gm = 4.7
Fic. 12 (a)
(cont.)
_~______
U (km/sec)
3.70 -
Rayleigh Wave
T V IF
3.50 --
,/ 0a
V SS3 -o
ssi
o~ SS4--o
3.20 - SS5 --
3.00 H- VT ' VV
70km Crust
A A A A /m= 4.7
AA
2.70
I I I I I I I I I I I I1 1 I I l I I I I I I I I II
10 12 14 16 18 22 26 30 34 38 42 48 54 60 66 72 788490
20 24 28 32 36 39 45 51 57 63 69 75 8187
T (sec)
Fig. 12 (b)
/(km/sec)
2.5 3.5 4.5 5.0
10 - SS3 - 345 a
SS4 -------- 346 o
SS5----- 348 x
20- (m= 4.7)
SE --- 346
30- (m=4.8)
40-
50-
60I
70 km Crust
70
70
- Pm =4 7
80
90 x Xx
100-
Depth (km)
Fig. 12 (b)
(cont.)
F-J
Li
U(km/sec)
370 -
Rayleigh Wave Y , Y
0x
V
3.50 -- X A A
A 0
Ax
0
X
x0
/3m
S SE o 4.8
>"3.30
SS5 x 4.7
a1)
0o
3.00 -- V
IS
S A A
V 70 km Crust
o
tK
A A AA A
Fig. 12 (c)
---.- , ---
SHL Z LR OBSERVED ,--
S7 SYNTHETICS, 5kmn DEPTH
LOW 0
It N-NORMAL 0
It'll
I AI
min
To 25S
Fig. 13 (a)
LoJ
(J1
4 dl
575S
1 min
To = 25S
Fig. 13 (b)
*.-
NDI Z LR
500 S '
1 min
To z 25S
Fig. 13(c)
__
-No1 Z 4-19-63PL
t/
-- 70 I SACE, S(t)
LAYER-HALF
3iswl
H,,1 -
1 MIN
Fig. 14 (a)
C
LAYER-HALFSPACE " "
31i0 2.3-0
70 KM CRUST-
85 KM CRUST --
/
. to-
Sit)
SI
MIN
Fig. 6.04 349
14 (b)&.16356
146 4. 16448
Fig . 14 (b)
246S -
ii1
I / 16 MINI
I-.MIN
Fig. 14 (c)
o
0
240.0 r-
TIBET Pn 3 -
17
200.0 -
160.0 -
o9 0o
a0
120.0 -
80.0 -
-DD
40.0 -
II I II I I I I I -
0.0 L I I I I
0.0 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 6.0 7.0 8.0 9.0 IQO 11.0 12.0 13.0 14.0 15.0 16.0 17.0
DISTANCE (DEG)
Fia. 15
79km/s
CI) 8.0-
- -- -
-
-
0
U)0
11 c 0 00 o~ 0 0 0
a . D 1-j 80 0 0 0 0
ED0 0 0 0
00
~- 0.0 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 6.0 7.0 8.0 9.0 10.0 11.0 12.0 13.0 14.0 15.0 16.0 17.0
DISTANCE (DEG)
Fig. 15
(cant.)
14 3.
-
TIBET Pn 3 100
160.0
SHARP ARR.
w
! 120.0 -
I-
I-
w 80O
I- xX* v
40.0
0.0 L I I I I I I I I I
0.0 1.0 2.0 3.0 40 5.0 6.0 70 8.0 9.0 10.0
DISTANCE (DEG)
w
,) -x xx x x
-J x
-X x h x x x
.0 '3,x
D x
w
M~ N = 39 x
-8. 0- 8.0.1 km/s
1. 2.0I I I I I J
0.0 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 6.0 70 8.0 9.0 101
DISTANCE (DEG)
Fig. 16 (a)
144.
TIBET Pn 30- I0
w
160.0 SHARP ARR.
I0
w 120.0-
hi
a"' 80.0 -
o
I-
.u . M
X
0a
0.0 8 I I I I I
0.0 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 6.0 7.0 8.0 9.0 IQO
DISTANCE (DEG)
w
u, 8.0-
< - 7.9 km/s
a
--- - --- ' ..
0 - 0
o o 0
uiJ --
i-
0
N39
NJ
-8.0- 8.12.06 km/s
Fig. 16 (b)
145.
HIMALAYA Pn 3"-10"
S160.0 -
W o 0o
Sox
w
120.0- 0
I- 0.0
ao
w
0 40.0 - 0 --- o
0 .00.0 1.0 I 2.0 I 4.0
3.0 I 5.0
i 6.0
I 70I 8.0 I
9.0 I
I0.0O
DISTANCE (DEG)
U 8.0-
7.9 km/s
30
0 00
- 0.00 o n 0
0
w
S N=21
a-
o -8.0-
0J 8.1 0.1 km/s
I I I I I I I I I I
w 0.0 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 G.0 7.0 8.0 9.0 10.0
DISTANCE (DEG)
Fig. 17
146.
320.0
wJ TIBET Sn 30 - I0
I)
w
S240.0
..J
w
Ik:
I-
S160.0
w
I--
K
L) o
w
o 80.0
I-
o
I [II I II II I
0.0 1.0 2.0 30 4.0 5.0 6.0 70 8.0 9.0 10.0
DISTANCE (DEG)
0
W
Ci,) 16.0
E
N =23
4.77.08 km/s
-J
S4.5 km/s
9 8.0
c.)
w
S0
S0.0 0 0 0
0
w 00 0 0p
ac
cr 0 0 0
O
0
0
x: -8.0 - a
I-
w
0 .0 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 6.0 7.0 8.0 9.0 IQO
DISTANCE (DEG)
Fig. 18
a S
40
35
30
250
Fig.
0
800 900 40 N
30 0 N
70 0 E
900 1000
800
Fig. 20
149.
DAV E KEV N
01' 19 01 19
S
I Min I Min
JER N UME N
16 55 16 57
S
(7) I Min
RAB N VAL N
05: 10
0512
ISMi IMini
( II)
ATH N MAT N
07 27 07: 22
s
S S
(-4) (-4)
I Min I Min
Fig. 21
Dec 16, 66 C Himalayo
CTA E WIN E
21: 14 21 14
I Min I Min
A
6
ATM
ATH
AT NAI
0KEV NAI
PG
PMG
-
A STOL orG
- A A u AA
NUR
- ,
5 I I , I I , ,
30 40 50 so 70 30 40 50 60 70 so
so
A (DEGREES) A(DEGREES)
0
AAE OCT. 14,66
OCT 14.66 TIBET TIBET
3645*N 8743*E AAE
TAB AAE 36.45*N 8743'E
- x DAV +10 - xTA x DEPTH 14 KM
ANP Jx xx
xSTS
IST A STp JJR ATM
xANP D A x NOR
SUR
SISToNUR 0 0OSTU
X IKEVAT RSTU ZgKE
+5-
x
A
A ---------------------------------- DEPTHSKM
A& A-
A
1-0
'C
A A
-s I 30
,
40 50 60
p
70 so 30 40 SO 60 70 80
& (DEGREES) A (DEGREES)
0 ---
E xK K+
x
II SHI
x AAE
A A A0
GDH
.. . . . . W xATH D 0 T LG H-----
DEPTH
AA
A A " --
0 A A A K
I I I I
30 40 50 60 70 80 30 40 50 60 70 80
&(DEGREES) A (DEGREES)
+5 M
IST
x
NUR KON
IG? ADRI TOL
xGDH MAT x KONGTRG
o
V GO
+5 -NUR
MAT Ix x x TOL
A x
DEPTHA KM
AA ,
0
l
o
AA A A A.A
wA
JULY 14.73 TIBET x
x 8TS A 351 *N 8640E
A STP DEPTH 22KM
-IE
t I i I _ I I I I I
30 40 50 60 70 80 30 40 50 - 60 70 so
A (DEGREES) A (DEGREES)
aF-
JAN.I9.7S TIBET
JAN 7,5 TIBET 32 39"N TO 50*E
323g*N ?65OE
DEPTH I KM
i STU
AAE COP
AAE K FKN-
STU COt.
I KEV
MKC x v 0
ANP ATH BUL
KON
COL AMP K y R. ,
0
TRII 0 ST
I BUL ATH IS
(K
ANP
Kf
U
NUR Vr
DI ----.. NU-------.------ -UAT---------
MAT M
x MAT x KIIw
I :-----------------------------------------------------
----------------
-S -
- I I I I I I I
30 40 sO 60 70 sO so 40 50 so TO 80
A (DEGREES) A (DEGREES)
APR 28 , 75 TIBET
35 so*N 7?986E
APR 28,75 TIBE1 +10
+10- 33 KM
SS 0*N 7986*1
MAT
M AI ST, ATM1
SAG AT I MAT NA a S T J AA' TR1 MAI Vt
o
0
Sx K TRI
G
DAG
' 01
x
o
x
-- a A
I , I , I I I I ,
-s_ , I , 1 I , _1 , l ,
3A 4 . SO GR TO s0 o30 40 so So 7o so
& (DEGREES) A(DEGREES)
10 AAE 33KM
KEV
RA B
sTs NU CoP X PTO NUR COP 9A N
AAE PTO x OP 9TU COL MN
ASM AN
GUA A A
30 40 so 0 TO 80 5 30 40 50 60 70 B0
&(DEGREES)
0 A (DEGREES)
I
AAE
10 - MAY19, 75 TIBET
AA[ A (DEGREES) MAYt19 75? TIBET
35 I*N SO BO*E
3516N i60 OO*E
S BAG T NAA 35 1I*N
, BOB0OE
BAG KEY x x #T,
I NUR I A T, BG TRI NAI
SsTI ATM sTUNAI .T I5 .URS UR
. I STU
STU
+5 -
x I COP So '0 x ATM 50
oC 0 60 TO 60
A x +- 0 EV ICOP O 0 O
A A A
0 0
-S ~ I ~ i P ,
- . I , ,, I I I , I
30 40 50 60 7O
so o 30 eO 50 so TO so
A (DEGREES) & (DEGREES)
JUNE 4. 75 TIBET
35 87* 79 S*E
JUNE 4 , 75 TIBET
AE
35.67N 7965'E
+10- NA 33 KM
I
AAE
0I
NAI BUL
STU Vt I
1
co, 1
KON x
I
KTO T UL
STU
x 9x
+58- N NR C OS Ox x
I EV aB
OCOL -MG x x
K K C0PK1
10 0
10 COL
IST xA
x VAL
0 1 GOH 5 KM
? !t --
A I IKEV
0 ION
KOM
AaA A
Fig. 22 (a) A A
22(b)
Fig.
(cont.) x 8Ts
_-5 _. I , I I , I
AKST,BTp (Cont.)
30 40 50 60 70 80 30 40 50 60 70 B0
A (DEGREES) A (DEGREES)
I
TRI x x sT5
X
TRI Q U
x o 5 KM
x
,--
Iol00 -- -- - -- - I
--PTO
K
- -- - - - - -- -
ATH AQUSTU TOL x ...... .. . ....... .....
x ..
HLW ATH STU ESK PI
I
x NUR COP PTO I COP TOL 0
oNUR
NUR A
I o 0 o x
0
TRI
- I , I I , I , I I
30 , , I , t I ,
30 40 50 60 70 80so 30 40 50 60 70 60
A(DEGREES) A (DEGREES)
Oa a VAL , 10
A HNR 0 o 0 ox VLT )L (PTO
GUA x
. 1 I I I I , I -52 I , I , I , I ,
30 40 0so 60 70 0 30 40 50 60 T0 S
A(DEGREES) A (DEGREES)
NAl x x x &T. + - 0I o
I
VAL) RA13 STU BUL
x STU 0NA MI KM VALo PT CTA
x CTA -AI-ool
T
Ix PTO x I.
TRI KON
ATH x ATH x ONMAL
TOL HKC MAL9
A UME A a x A 0 UMETOL
A AMAL
I A AI
x x
[SUL
* I , I I , I I I
30 40 50 60 70 s0 30 40 50 60 70 s0
A(DEGREES) A (DEGREES)
+5 - 0 NA
NHA 8 JER
STRI CTA NHA o SHK oR
0 I ECTA
- 08
A
0I SHK
A
x
o
SI
MAL
TOL
8
A
PMGRE WIN
TO
DEPTH S KM
TOL pME
SUL WtN
BUL
-, I
-It, II1
30
30 40 50 60 70 80 40 50 60 70 80
A(DEGREES) A (DEGREES)
x x S SHIoMAT ATH 0o
IUoAH
TRI TOL
I I |I
SHI TRI x
-S II I I ,
30 40 50 60 70 80
30 40 50 o60 70 O
A (DEGREES)
(DEGREES)
MAT ST ATM
SHI IST ATH
SN) lST A
., _ I, I ,
30 40 50 60 70 80
30 40 50 40 70 so
A (DEGREES) A (DEGREES)
3 40 50 60 70 so
S0 40 50 610 710 a 10
A (DEGREES)
A(DEGREES)
8 DEPTH 5 KM
_
7
5 _
w 4
n1r
3
DEPTH5 KM
2
0
2 -
-3
II
IO
8
i t DEPTH 33 KM
U) 65
4
DEPTH33 KM
3
2
Fig. 24
DEPTH (KU)
4 45 50 19 33 20 37 12 20
0
9-3-72 9-26-64 12-16-66 6-27-66 3-24-74 10-21-64 3-14-67
1-19-75* 6-4-75 4-28-75 3-6-66 5-19-75 7-14-73 10-14-66 7-22-72 5-5-75 2-19-70
~I-----
-- ----- I-TI-
SOLIDUS
Qtz. Eclogite
40 -H 2 Sat. Peridotite
Granite HO Sat.
H O Sat..
, 20 4 -,/
2Gabbro
/
M. 0.1t.%H.0\/
\ / Dry
;
! / /Eclogite
10 I 1c t
.7
T (oC)
Fig. 25
U1
H
140
160.
CHAPTER IV
An Intermediate Depth Earthquake Beneath Tibet:
Wang-Ping Chen
Cambridge, MA 02139
Thomas J. Fitch
Cambridge, MA 02139
John L. Nabelek
Cambridge, MA 02139
Peter Molnar
Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences
Cambridge, MA 02139
1-2.
Abstract
periods of 50 sec.
133.
INTRODUCTION
normal faulting.
13
attenuation coefficient.
velocity structures.
of the data.
amplitude data onto the focal sphere and simply using the
the data.
September 14, 1976 is near 90 km, the depth phases are well
at SHI, TAB and TRI are negligible. The first motion of the
178.
waves.
180.
TECTONIC IMPLICATIONS
Normal Faulting at Depth
Tibetan mantle.
CONCLUSIONS
)
184.
Acknowledgements
References
1980.
1976.
41-54, 1979.
188.
419-426, 1975.
1978.
5729-5743, 197 .
!89.
Figure Captions
are not smoothed and only peaks and troughs are plotted
(open circles). Theoretical spectra (scales shown to
calibration pulse.
19%.
simplicity.
tion is parameterized by t* = 1.
P sp P sP P sP
JER
JER
53 00
1 MIN
tfAwO
COL 56 00
P pP
54 00 STU
-- A - AycV ;(YIIY(lrY~~
1PP 09 14 76
M
I MI
29.81 N 89.57 E
Fig. 2 TIBET
201.
N= 66 W
.1 =216-228
Fig. 3a
202.
N 1
Fig. 3b .
203.
06:54-48 HKC Z LR
07:05:30 JER Z LR
07:03:05 MAT Z LR
I mmin
KBL Z
06:52 20
,I min
Fig. 4
204.
U
a,
I0
E
81
C
a,
0
0
a-
cn
0
U
a,
0
a,
*r QI
I-
T (sec)
Fig. 5
205.
1 - I0-2
/
to-2
0 1
45km o/
01 i' / o
0 0
I , II\
E I11 11
- I I il
l "
zI I (b)
0 I I.
sol27IBA
X= 2, I/ -4
10=2 BAG Z _ 10
I09 14 76 T0bel
195 km,Sol 3
10 20 30 40 50
T (sec)
Fig. 5
(cont.)
206.
10 -,
45km
0 / o
/ 0/ 1-I0-2
Ik\
ool\
/ 0
u : / / <'
-, Iv' L/
II l o
11 - i
0
"6I III
o 'iI II o! 0
.,2 oI I
ocmn
- 0. 85km, 09 14 76 Tibet
Sol2 1011
Xs270 II -4
-
95km S03 10
(C)
10 20 30 40 50
T (sec)
Fig. 5
(cont.)
207.
45km
10 0
oo
o 0
/ ,, -
I'
If' AU
c/t,
/Ig
oo1,
00
1 A-
E 10 o(a
ro (
3ED
I . 01.
I 11;
to
I ! HKC Z
0 09 14 76 Tibet
0 1) II
0o 85km /i ,
Sol 2 I
- X=270II 0
-X:232oj I
- 95 km, Sol3
I (d)
I I I _
10 20 30 40 50
T (sec)
Fig. 5
(cont.)
208.
to -2
45km-
0/0
o'
/ 0'i
-,L
/ 1 -
E0 I 30
85kmio
I -
41 iiS'\2, 4/L
o i270* i - 1
10 20 30 40 50
T (sec)
Fig. 5
(cont.)
209.
0 20 30 40 50
T (sec)
Fig. 5
(cont.)
210.
I0C
0-2
45 k
0
0*
U)
n0
0
i-3,
30
KBS Z
09 14 76 Tibet
km, Sol. 3
/I
i fI I I I
10 20 30 40 50
T (sec)
Fig. 5
(cont.)
211.
10-
-2
45km 01
S/ I\ 0
o/0o
o 0
SII I KEV Z -
II0 II /II
0
Z I - I,I,
Ii 0 09 14 76 Tibet
'i in
I lo
- I I
o 95 km, Sol 3
0
0.1
Fig. 5
(cont.)
212.
t0o-
\ -10-2
E
- 45k o o0 ,/!2/ ,
00-
"" ! I 1 o I In
o 'o Ao t o O
0.0
I -- 'ONoi
if/ Z
S1o10 09 14 76 Tibet 0
0 I I, In
I- o / E
km, Sol 3
85 km,
SoL2,~
SSo.2, =2i / l,950 1 1l/ (i)-"
t0 20 30 40 50
T(sec)
Fig. 5
(cont.)
213.
10 -
0
45 km
- -2 n
Co Iv 10 (n
E
Z
"C 0
0.I
j,
0
I 0 MAT Z
ot 09 14 76 Tibet
I11i1, 0 1
OiAI n
oI I 0I
* I/ i~ i0
0
v 85km,
S Sol 2 iI
X 270 - - 95km
=
X 2 32-* o
1 , 1 -I
0.1 10 20 30 40 50
T (sec)
Fig. 5
(cont.)
214.
0
c*
10 S
'o CA .
pt
0.
I-
,6-4
T ( sec)
Fig. 5
(cont.)
215.
45km
o
10
I 1
85111
i1
k/ o I0
1o
,
0 / -2 0
0
/I I SHI Z
o 1 09 14 76 Tibet
0 11, 0 /1~l
JI
95 km, Sol 3
85 km
Sol 2,X=2700
10 20 30 40 50
T (sec)
Fig. 3
(cont.)
216.
o'
010 o
-62
'o-o2
4-
E /I
o 0
0
Ok(U 0
0 0 0 TAB Z
0U l , I 09 14 76 Tibet
oO 3
95 km, Sol 3
85km 0
- Sol. 2, x 270* m)
t0 20 30 40 50
T (sec)
Fig. 5
(cont.)
40
MHI
9 14 76 Tibet
TAB
KBL' KON
24
Mo5.5x 10 dyne-cm ATH KEV
JER
4- MAT HKC CHG
em
BAGJ SHI ST rKBS
0 E SOL,3 90KM
SOL.
o *
-C-
-
*0 * A=2
0
85KM
II __
Tk)!Uqz un
-/X
*8TZ
TAB Z ATH Z IST Z
t
P
JER Z TRI Z
P P
SHI Z MAT Z
t
PPt P
AAE Z DAV Z
-pP, D 1 /3x
P/ P
2 sP
P P
x nodal I MIN
I2X
Observed
X= 2320*
*=2
X=270a
-&- * 3
ii""i~-
I MIN
Fig. 9
221.
06:51:28
BAG Z 1.5 k
06:50:071
expected P arrival time
(b) SNG Z 3k
LEM Z 0.75k
sP
I
I min
Fig. 10
222.
BIOGRAPHIC NOTE
The author was born on November 28, 1951 to
Mr. S.K. Chen and Mrs. P.Y.C. Chen in Taipei, Taiwan, R.O.C.
in June, 1974.
Res., 1979.
Appendix A:
We solve analytically the one-dimensional time-
7=
6 Az~ + (Qh Aa)$/i, )
225.
# AX 644)
[Lachenbruch, 1970].
V T-k -As
0,' .)
[7 -- O
and -
, o
w(z,t) will have the form zero flux at k' p=ex ),
and from boundary condition of zero f lux at k)P=( %),
We have
2l00=
hD
x -c Z~'D1((~'/~
tt~~~~t-( ca t-/ )
where
B)
From equations (A2) to (A4) and (A8), it is clear
AA
A()=A* ) !-
T A o e0- 6 +-A
4 <(A)
/0
T-,)AA %,( 1o)
/
00
Thus, '-(, ) = ) -T with
14
(A/i
4 f@-Pb
1~ 3 e#3~
(P p*b' iic Pb')-2J
g1ts- 2 4 ,-t
Co(P'
I'>c''
(b)
Az) Ao-z/D
(b) A(z) = Ae-,z/D assuming that the migration of heat
crustal thickening).
Initial condition: from (A4), with z replaced by z/a
c -
-r ' .exp (-
"4 A, )
+(r P,- 4~2,p)v p6 . -D At, b4 (A /3)
"T
Thus, as in (All)
D I- -4o4
64
A" o
D?.= A x C-1, )
ep
e/, - .
229.
T1%4
ii = (C-)I Lj L)4PI
13 = 12
14 = (A / T)
z/ D
(c) A(z) = A0 e - and the migration of heat producing
Thus, as in (All)
,=- A0
7>1= ,. - .
2)=-;oL- ( a pc- ;, - )
230.
bj4f
13--
(A/')
T = Qh z//4:
Tm = 220 + Tm 0 = 770 0 C.
For TR, we calculated the values at three different
and (c). With these values any TR for a given D and time
details.
details.
Fig. A3 (c) TR as a function of time at z = 55 km for h' = 70 km
and for different values of D. See Fig. A2 (c) for details.
from the surface (case (a), Appendix A). See equations (A9)
and (AlO).
(a)
2
my. [h'/70(km)] 2//[ /OO(cm /sec)]
0 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90
(b)
Fig. Al
236.
10 1
(a) A(Z) =Ao,Os0 Z0 D0
351k
08 koh [ D3 5 k m
T O30km
Z - 70 km-
02-
0 0 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
my h,/70(km)] 001 8/ 0(cm/sec)
-Z / D
10 AtZI
cIb Aoe I5
08 h35 km ,o 2
Z- 70km
-D=10km '-i
D- 2 5 k.
TR
04
02
OO II i l
10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
m y [h' (cm2/sec)
/70 (km)]2/[/OOlf
Fig. A2
237.
h=35km, a=2 D= 10 km
Z 55S km
-D12 5km
a 6-
T
7' oQ
4-
2-
i J 1_ _1
.^
0 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 to
my [W/70 (km)]'/[ /OOl(cm2/sec)]
oeITz / I I I
T
(c) 0 30 4 0 6 7 0 0 0
h =35km, a-2_ _-- - - . . .
8 Z=551rn D =2 5kf_.. -
TR
T.'
4-
2-
10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
my 2/001
[h'/70(kml]2/ (cm2/sec)]
Fig. A3
238.
IJD I I I I I I I I I
(o) A(Z) Ao, O Z SD D 20m
08 h = 35 km, a =2 1- - -
O z35km - .. . =
35 km
=
06o- D 15km
S04- -' D= 5 km
02-
L A I I
0 0 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 10(
my [h'/70 (km)]/[ /OOI1 (cm /sec)]
- Z/
(b) A (Z) = Aoe D
h 35km,a 2
08 z- 35 km
06
QE D *Okm
TR
T 04
,Dx25km
02
10 20 30 40 2 50 60 70 80 90 I00
my [h'/70( km)] [/OOl(cm2/sec)]
-z/
(c)A (Z) AoeD
h35
km a 2 D-5k
08 Z 35km
D= IOkm
TR06 -
O2 --
T. 04
02-
0 0 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
my h'?70(km)]/[./OO (cm2/SeC]
Fig. A4
2 2
(b) T R -AoD /k o D<<h
To - R1/02. TR0
700-
Ao =10 HGU
600-
2 2
(a) TO AoD a /2k, T(o I/b T2
for ZaD
O
Ao =I HGU Z =70kmin TRZ70km
I/aT
400 z
400 - A x 70 km 400-
A 55 km Ao= 10 HGU
TR(C)
0 o 35 km
AZ=55 km
oIllI 1 I I
0 10 20 30 0 5 10 5 o
D ( km) D (km)
0 (kin)
Fig. A5
240
APPENDIX B
in the co-authored papers which appear in Chapter II, III and IV.