Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
Buenas
Practices prctica
for more
agrcolas
Resilient para un
Agriculture
Guidelines for Producers
agricultura ms resilient and Governments
Lineamientos para orientar la tar
de productores y gobiern
Alejandra
Alejandra Daz, Luciano
Daz, Luciano Gebler,
Gebler, Lucia Lucia
Maia, Maia,
Lourdes Medina,
Lourdes Medina, Sacha
Sacha TrellesTrelles
Buenas prcticas
Good Agricultural
agrcolas para una
Practices
agricultura for more
ms resiliente
Resilient Agriculture
Lineamientos para orientar la tarea
de productores
Guidelines y gobiernos
for Producers
and Governments
Good Agricultural Practices for more Resilient Agriculture: Guidelines for Producers and Gov-
ernments by IICA is published under license Creative Commons
(http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/igo/)
IICA encourages the fair use of this document. Proper citation is requested.
This publication is also available in electronic (PDF) format from the Institutes Web site: http://
www.iica.int
ISBN: 978-92-9248-699-0
AGRIS DEWEY
E10 630.252 53
FOREWORD 5
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS 7
1. INTRODUCTION 9
2. OBJECTIVE 13
3. SCOPE 13
4. DEFINITIONS 15
5. GENERAL FRAMEWORK 19
5.1 Agriculture and the Environment 20
5.2 Good Agricultural Practices in Latin America 21
5.3 Toward a comprehensive approach to good agricultural practices 24
5.4 Responsibilities in the implementation of good agricultural practices 26
7. BIBLIOGRAPHY 67
PHOTOGRAPHS 69
FOREWORD
Good agricultural practices (GAPs) are an indispensable tool for risk
management due to the close relationship between agriculture
and climate, as well as the climate variability currently being expe-
rienced. The implementation of these tools, however, involves fos-
tering innovation, increasing knowledge and giving stakeholders,
small producers in particular, a holistic view, so that they may im-
prove their production systems, increase their resilience, and ensure
their sustainability.
5
This publication is aligned with the mandates and guidelines of the
regions ministers of agriculture, who agree on the need to promote
an agricultural sector with production systems that are more envi-
ronmentally friendly, that will meet the demand for food and forage
required by the increasing world population, and where risks are ad-
dressed in a comprehensive way.
6
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
We wish to thank the GAP program leaders of the different coun-
tries who participated in the events organized by IICA. We also wish
to thank the producers and processors from Brazil and Costa Rica
who were interviewed during the validation process of the guide,
and the experts, for all their contributions.
7
1. INTRODUCTION
Agriculture worldwide, and specifically in the Americas, faces the
challenge of maintaining and improving productivity growth rates,
which also differ significantly among countries and types of agri-
culture (IICA 2016). Undoubtedly, innovation and the development
of technical capacities - in individuals, in organizations and in soci-
ety generally - are an indispensable component for increasing pro-
ductivity and being able to fully confront that challenge through
collaborative practices, sustainable solutions and comprehensive
proposals for adaptation to climate change.
10
Climate change affects the ecological relationships of the natural
environment and agroecosystem. Identifying and quantifying their
effects is complex, as they occur as a result of changes or pressures
in the ecological interrelations of the production process.
11
b) With respect to abiotic factors, extremes are detrimental: an in-
crease in the amount and intensity of rainfall accelerates soil loss;
a decrease in rainfall causes unexpected droughts. In both cases,
the support capacity of the biome is affected, although over time
it can be adapted. In any case, the socio-economic consequences
will not be anticipated: to replace soil loss and lack of water, a
financial investment will have to be made, and a change in the
type of vegetation involves introducing new crops or in any case,
learning to cope with new environmental conditions.
This document has been structured in such a way that the first part
brings together a set of indicators related to GAP that should be
satisfied by both producers and government entities (public pol-
icies, service provision). Then, using these indicators, an analysis
of the current situation and a risk assessment are presented high-
lighting the strengths and weaknesses of the organization under
study (government or farm). The information obtained in the di-
agnostic phase allows the producer to plan his work according to
an established schedule, in order to reduce or eliminate the risks
that his property runs. In this way, the producer constructs his own
road map, clearly establishes his priorities, the dimension affected,
and the manner and moment in which he will solve the identified
deficiency.
Governments, in turn, get a picture of the points to watch out for and,
by verifying the good progress of GAPs, are able to act more effective-
ly to reduce the impact of climate change.
12
2. OBJECTIVE
To support the design and implementation of integrated GAP pro-
grams or plans that contribute to countries improvement in health,
environmental, economic and social aspects, while promoting climate
change mitigation and adaptation.
3. SCOPE
This guide is intended for public institutions, such as agricultural
health and food safety services, as well as other organizations that,
in promoting GAPs, promote environmental protection and atten-
tion to climate change in agriculture.
13
4. DEFINITIONS
Adaptation: Process of adjustment to the real or projected climate
and its effects. In human systems, adaptation seeks to moderate or
avoid damage or take advantage of beneficial opportunities. In some
natural systems, human intervention can facilitate adjustment to the
projected climate and its effects (IPCC 2014).
Biotic and abiotic factors: Terms used in the field of ecology, biology,
agronomy and other sciences, with a focus on the environment. Biotic
factors refer to everything that is alive in a particular place, whether
16
humans, animals, plants or microorganisms (including the living part
of soil and water). Abiotic factors refer to all non-living components of
a particular location, such as rocks, weather (rain, wind, sunlight, etc.),
soil (the physical part of clay, silt and sand), and water (not counting
microorganisms). In nature, in a holistic analysis, it is very difficult to
completely separate the biotic factors from the abiotic ones. However,
in an impact assessment process and environmental evaluation, they
should be kept separate to the maximum extent in order for the task
to be fully executed.
17
defoliants, desiccants, agents for reducing fruit density or inhib-
itors of germination, and substances applied to crops before or
after harvest to protect the product against deterioration during
storage and transportation. The term normally excludes fertilizers,
plant and animal nutrients, food additives and veterinary drugs
(Codex Alimentarius Commission 2016).
18
5. GENERAL FRAMEWORK
5.1 Agriculture and the Environment
20
5.2 Good Agricultural Practices in Latin America
21
However, addressing sanitary, phytosanitary and environmental
risk management separately is not very effective, since public pol-
icies, as well as technical assistance and training provided by the
various institutions to producers, will, in addition to having a frag-
mented view of agriculture, suffer from a lack of coordination and
miss the opportunity to work in a complementary and integrated
way (Figure 1).
Water Worker
Hygiene and Soil health
and food safety
Adaptation and
Phytosanitary mitigaction
protection
Management
of waste
and
contaminants
22
Checkbox 1. Main Characteristics of Official GAP
programs in Latin America*
Institutional Framework
- Ministries of agriculture or institutions under their authority, head GAP programs, although
there are others promoting these methods.
Regulatory Framework
- GAP regulations are included in other regulations, such as safety or phytosanitary regula-
tions. There are, however, countries like Panama, which have specific GAP laws.
- Official monitoring is limited and focuses mainly on export activities.
- Countries have more general GAP manuals or guides for products that have been chosen
because of the opportunity they present or because they are targeted for export. These ma-
terials are based mainly on private standards and deal only in a limited way with the environ-
ment and climate change.
Scope of GAP
- GAP programs focus mainly on safety issues and are intended to meet the require-
ments of external markets. Few countries have focused on their domestic market.
- Argentina and Brazil have experience in applying GAP in the agricultural sector,
including methods aimed at reducing the impact of climate change
Coordination
- There is little coordination between extension agencies and climate change in the ministries
of agriculture and other public institutions promoting GAP.
- Countries such as Brazil and Argentina have made progress in thematic integration at the
local and regional level.
- There is a greater degree of linkages with institutions that promote exports.
Public-Private Coordination
- There is generally greater public-private coordination in the export sector.
Certification
- Private sector certification predominates, particularly for export.
- Some countries, such as Chile, Brazil and Costa Rica, have made progress in official certifica-
tion initiatives aimed at the domestic market,
Funding
- Programs depend on the technical and financial capacity of plant health or food safety units
- Although resources and external cooperation have been available for the development of
GAP programs, these have been directed primarily at meeting the requirements of external
markets.
* Prepared on the basis of results from regional and national GAP meetings organized by IICA, as well as interviews
with producers and packers from different countries.
23
5.3 Toward a comprehensive approach to good
agricultural practices
The producer, for example, would not be managing only the risks
of his property or a specific type of risk (phytosanitary or sanitary,
which are the most common because they guarantee access to mar-
kets), but would also be paying attention to risks that are generated
in the immediate area of his farm and that may affect his quality of
life or the quality of his production. Even if the monitoring and anal-
ysis process is done by segments (GAP checklist), the result will only
be complete if the community manages to reduce socio-economic
and environmental impacts to levels deemed safe.
Environment
Adaptation Public health
Integrated Pesticide
Worker pest residues Production
Food health management
security
24
Therefore, GAP systems, despite being primarily directed at the produc-
tion of food for commercial purposes, interact with broader issues, such
as public health and environmental protection.
Finally, there is the role of certification and quality seals, which are
public statements about the companys achievement generally
in relation to the safety of a specific product, an issue that is also
part of the objectives of a GAP program. However, with some com-
munication and marketing effort, standards such as safe for the
environment or this product contributes to reducing the impact of
climate change, could also be added, thereby recognizing the pro-
ducers effort (Executing Agency) and that of the government (Sys-
tem Organizer), which would open up new profit opportunities for
the private sector.
25
5.4 Responsibilities in the implementation
of good agricultural practices
Governments are thus faced with the challenge of being able to trig-
ger intensive and permanent processes of GAP implementation, with
a holistic approach, in which all actors participate together through a
shared vision (Figure 3).
Government: Producer:
Provides institutional and Applies the GAP with an
regulatory frameworks, integrative approach:
access to basic services, agricultural health and
infrastructure, technology safety, workers' health,
research and transfer, etc. environment, adaptation,
mitigation.
26
6. ELEMENTS FOR THE DESIGN
AND IMPLEMENTATION OF GOOD
AGRICULTURAL PRACTICES
Because of the shared responsibility of different actors in the imple-
mentation of good agricultural practices (GAP), their progress will
undoubtedly depend on the efforts of both the government and the
producer sector.
Propagating
material and Management
History seeds of soil and
and management other
of the farm
substrates
Training Fertilization
GAP with
comprehensive
Waste Water
management
approach management
Crop
Transport protection
Hygiene Presence of
and health animals on
the farm
28
6.1 Indicators for the comprehensive management of
good agricultural practices
29
GAP INDICATORS WITH A
COMPREHENSIVE APPROACH
Table 2. GAP Indicators with a Comprehensive Approach.
32
KEY FEATURES OF GAPs LEVEL 1: GOVERNMENT LEVEL 2: PRODUCER
33
KEY FEATURES OF GAPs LEVEL 1: GOVERNMENT LEVEL 2: PRODUCER
4. Fertilization
34
KEY FEATURES OF GAPs LEVEL 1: GOVERNMENT LEVEL 2: PRODUCER
4.3 Storage of Chemical Fertilizers
Fertilizers must be stored in such a way as to Are there regula- What is the per-
avoid risk of contaminating water sources or tions governing centage of farms
harvested products. the storage of with a structure
fertilizers? to store chemical
fertilizers?
Are there storage
and distribution What is the
structures for chem- percentage of
ical fertilizers that producers storing
meet the needs of fertilizers proper-
the region? ly to reduce the
risk of contami-
nation of water
sources?
4.4 Organic Fertilizers and Biofertilizers
(Substrates derived from biogas plants are Are there official What is the percent-
included here.) standards governing age of producers
the use of organic using organic fer-
Before using an organic fertilizer, an environ- fertilizers and biofer- tilizers or bio fertil-
mental and safety risk assessment should tilizers? izers based on a risk
be done. The type of fertilizer, the treatment assessment?
method, the heavy metal content and the Is the use of sewage
time of application, etc. must be evaluated. sludge prohibited?
35
KEY FEATURES OF GAPs LEVEL 1: GOVERNMENT LEVEL 2: PRODUCER
5. Water Management
36
KEY FEATURES OF GAPs LEVEL 1: GOVERNMENT LEVEL 2: PRODUCER
5.2 Water Quality
Water must be of adequate quality for its Does the country What is the percent-
intended use. have public sanita- age of farms with
tion policies? potable water for
Irrigation water: The risk of water contami- consumption and for
nation depends on the type of irrigation. The Is the availability packaging products?
greatest danger presents itself via sprinkler of drinking water
irrigation because it moistens the edible part guaranteed for all?
of the crop, which can be kept moist for sev-
eral hours. In addition, the physical force of Are water quality What is the percent-
the water droplet impact may contaminate analysis laboratories age of farms with
the protected areas of the leaf / product. Drip available? rural sanitation?
irrigation, which does not wet the plant, is Have quality stan- What is the percent-
the method that represents the lowest risk of dards been estab- age of producers
contamination, although care must be taken lished for irrigation controlling the qual-
that there is no accumulation of water on the water? ity of irrigation water
soil surface or in the furrows, so that water according to estab-
does not come into contact with the edible lished standards?
part of the crop.
Water for fertilizers and for pest control:
Water used for the application of water-solu-
ble fertilizers and for pesticides should be of
the same quality as the water used in irriga-
tion and should not present microbial con-
taminants in quantities that may adversely
affect the safety of the plant products, espe-
cially if applied directly to the edible parts at
the time of harvest. Human pathogens can
survive and multiply in many agrochemicals,
including pesticides.
Water consumed by workers and used to
wash produce and surfaces that come into
contact with harvested products must be
potable.
If the quality of water used for human con-
sumption and for preparation of products for
consumption is guaranteed, health risks to
workers and final consumers are considerably
reduced.
A good water quality policy helps reduce the
costs of public health programs and ensures
greater permanence of workers in the work-
place.
37
KEY FEATURES OF GAPs LEVEL 1: GOVERNMENT LEVEL 2: PRODUCER
5.3 Water Storage
Water reservoirs appropriate to the conditions Does the country On what percent-
of the place must be installed, and must be have public regula- age of farms do
maintained to take advantage of periods tions governing the water harvesting
of abundance and to have water stored for installation of water activities take
periods of scarcity. reservoirs? place?
Are there programs On what percent-
that encourage age of farms do
the collection and water storage activ-
storage of water for ities take place?
agricultural use?
What is the per-
Are there programs centage of farms
that promote water that maintain water
conservation? storage facilities?
38
KEY FEATURES OF GAPs LEVEL 1: GOVERNMENT LEVEL 2: PRODUCER
6. Crop protection
39
KEY FEATURES OF GAPs LEVEL 1: GOVERNMENT LEVEL 2: PRODUCER
6.3 Mixture preparation and pesticides residue elimination
Mismanagement of pesticide residues (or Is there some offi- What percentage
lack of management) can result in the con- cial program that of farms have the
tamination of soil and water in an entire requires that there infrastructure for
area, a situation that not only affects the is some type of preparation and
producer and his family, but an entire region, structure in order elimination of pesti-
as occurs when a city uses a river as a source to prepare the cide residues?
of water supply. mixture and elimi-
nate the pesticide
Correct elimination of pesticide residues residues?
is synonymous with greater safety for the
population and accordingly, with less use of
the health services.
6.4 Calibration of equipment
Many problems relating to pesticide residues Does the country What percentage of
in food and in the environment are as a have official calibra- producers maintain
result of product waste due to poor calibra- tion programs? their equipment
tion of the equipment or because they have properly calibrated?
leaks.
The leaks can generate enormous clouds of
pesticides, which, once they are displaced
by the wind can, in a state of very high
concentration, reach both the workers and
persons who are far away from the place of
application.
Also, the excess discharge resulting from
poor calibration causes a greater amount
of pesticides to be released into the environ-
ment, which increases the quantity of resi-
dues in food and their discharge into rivers
and lakes through surface runoff (eg. after a
shower of rain).
Proper calibration means less product waste
and less pollution of the environment.
40
KEY FEATURES OF GAPs LEVEL 1: GOVERNMENT LEVEL 2: PRODUCER
6.5 Personal protective equipment (PPE)
The person applying the pesticide runs the risk Is it compulsory for What percentage
of being contaminated, and if this person is every case of pesti- of farms maintain a
contaminated, his family will be affected and cide poisoning to be poisoning registry?
the health services will also be affected. reported?
What percentage of
Is there any offi- farms ensure that
cial program that protective equip-
promotes the use ment is used?
of protective equip-
ment?
Is there monitoring
of the reported cases
of poisoning?
6.6 Pesticide storage
Storing pesticides correctly amounts to Does the country What percentage
protecting the environment, to protecting have a public policy of farms have a
the worker and also the livelihood of the that supports the structure for pesti-
producer. construction of cide storage on the
pesticide storage property itself?
In the case of the environment, it is import- structures?
ant that the pesticides are protected from
rain and wind, if the products are in powder Are there regulato-
form, in order to prevent them from being ry frameworks for
dispersed and from contaminating unpro- regulating pesticide
tected sites and people. storage on farms?
In the case of workers, safe storage and ade-
quate organization of the products amounts
to greater personal safety, since the risks of
making mistakes when managing and com-
ing into contact with polluting substances
are reduced.
In the case of the producer, an adequate
storage structure makes it possible for him
to store the pesticides on the property itself,
in order to prevent loss and theft, and thus
protect his income.
41
KEY FEATURES OF GAPs LEVEL 1: GOVERNMENT LEVEL 2: PRODUCER
6.7 Management of empty pesticide containers
The management of empty containers is an Is there some What percentage
indisputable safety factor for the producer official program of farms manage
and his/her family: the majority of cases of that promotes the empty pesticide
poisoning of people and animals on the farm management of containers?
are related to the use of pesticide containers empty pesticide
for other uses (for example, to transport water containers?
and food for humans and animals). Removing
containers from the farm considerably reduces Are there other
this risk. initiatives for the
collection of empty
containers?
How widespread
is the collection of
containers through-
out the country?
6.8 Pesticide residues
All the food destined for human or animal Is there an official What percentage of
consumption should respect the maximum monitoring pro- producers analyze
residue level for pesticides. gram for pesticide pesticide residues
residues? in relation to their
This measure, in addition to protecting the products?
health of humans and animals, prevents What percentage
economic losses for the producer, since, if it of the program is What percentage of
surpasses the established limits, he will not to directed toward producers analyze
be able to market products that are pesticide residues in
sold on the domes- relation to products
tic market? that are sold on the
domestic market?
Is there a capacity
for analysis of pesti-
cide residues in the
country?
Is there any capacity
to authorize/accred-
it/outsource/dele-
gate the laboratory
test services in order
to determine the
quantity of pesticide
residues?
42
KEY FEATURES OF GAPs LEVEL 1: GOVERNMENT LEVEL 2: PRODUCER
43
KEY FEATURES OF GAPs LEVEL 1: GOVERNMENT LEVEL 2: PRODUCER
8.3 Sanitary structures
The availability of sanitary structures in the Is there public pol- Which percentage of
field not only meets the needs of the worker, icy for supporting farms have sanitary
but is a gesture of consideration for the the construction of structures in the
environment. It indicates that waste is being sanitary structures field?
channeled to its correct destination and that on the farms?
biological pollution of vegetables that are
cultivated is being prevented on the farm. Are there regulato-
ry frameworks for
guiding the con-
struction of sani-
tary structures and
treating effluents
on the farm?
44
KEY FEATURES OF GAPs LEVEL 1: GOVERNMENT LEVEL 2: PRODUCER
10.2 Waste reduction and recycling
Contamination that residues or waste produces Are there regulations What percentage of
at the point of elimination, known as concen- and incentives to farms have a man-
trated contamination, is much more dangerous avoid, reduce, reuse agement plan for
than management of contaminants in the field. and recycle the residues and pollut-
Each farm should have a plan to get rid of the waste that is gener- ing agents?
waste and to collect the liquids that are generat- ated from agricultur-
ed (wastewater and mudslides), and this can be al activities?
done on the farm or through a public service.
Pesticides are among the principal contami-
nants, which is the reason why they should be
managed and eliminated in a technically prov-
en and approved manner.
11. Training
45
CHECKLISTS FOR COMPLIANCE
WITH GAP ON THE FARMS
47
Table 3. Checklists for compliance
with GAP on the farms.
Fulfillment
Aspects to review
Yes No
1. History and management of the farm
1.1 Arrangement of the physical space of the farm
a) Does the producer have the capacity to read and interpret a
map or sketch of the farm?
b) Does the producer have at this time a map or sketch
that enables him to visualize the farm: production areas,
facilities, roads, water resources, forest, etc.?
c) If the previous response is no, could the owner design or
help to design a map or sketch of the farm that enables him
to plan the use of the physical space?
1.2 Management of the production site
a) Does the farm have a risk assessment that shows that the
production site is suitable for production, and does it have
a management plan to minimize the risks identified?
2. Planting material
2.1 Health and quality of the planting material
a) Do the planting materials have health and quality
certification?
3. Management of the soil and other substrate
3.1 Soil maps
a) Does the producer have access to soil maps of the
region?
3.2 Analysis of soil and substrate
a) Have soil analyses been conducted on the farm?
b) Does the producer know how to collect soil samples or
has the technical assistance to do so?
c) Does the producer know how to interpret the results of
a soil analysis or has the technical assistance to do so?
d) Does the producer follow the recommendations that are
derived from the interpretation of the soil analysis?
e) Are the soil samples always collected in the same places?
f) Does the producer keep documentation and records of
the results of soil analyses and fertilization practices?
48
Fulfillment
Aspects to review
Yes No
g) Does the producer analyze the trends in fertilizer
application on the soil based on the results of cumulative
soil analyses over the years?
h) Is treated dung used?
i) Is sewerage waste used?
3.3 Erosion control
a) Does the producer know how to identify soil erosion on
the farm?
b) Does the property have at least one rain gauge that
enables it to measure the quantity of rainfall?
c) Is erosion observed in the furrows of the crop areas after
short, light rainfall (ex. 5 mm/hour)?
d) After short, light showers (eg. 5 mm/hour), is there an
accumulation of clay on the roads of the property?
e) After a light shower (eg. 5 mm/hour), are the rivers that
run through the property turbid due to the presence of
dirt?
f) Does the producer have knowledge of erosion control
techniques?
g) Are erosion control techniques used on the property?
h) Were the roads on the property designed to combat
erosion?
3.4 Soil coverage practices
a) Does the producer apply soil coverage practices?
b) Is a crop rotation system applied?
4. Fertilization
4.1 Quality of the fertilizers
a) Do the fertilizers have quality assurance (does it include
heavy metals)?
4.2 Fertilization program
a) Are the fertilizers applied following the indications of a
technical `adviser`?
b) Is the fertilization equipment calibrated before the
applications?
49
Fulfillment
Aspects to review
Yes No
4.3 Fertilizer storage
a) Is there a covered storage area, completely protected
from rain, for storage of chemical fertilizers?
4.4 Organic fertilizers and biofertilizers
a) Is animal dung or biofertilizers used on the property
in keeping with the provisions of the pertinent
regulations?
b) Does the dung used on the property undergo any type of
treatment that ensures that pathogens are eliminated?
c) Does the producer change clothes after handling
animals or dung and before coming into contact with
crops or vegetables?
d) The producer washes the hands after having handled
animals and dung and before coming into contact with
crops or vegetables?
4.5 Storage of organic fertilizer
a) Does the property have a covered repository to store
organic fertilizers to shield them from rain?
5. Water management
5.1 Determination of water needs
a) Has any system for controlling free water been installed
on the farm; e.g. a rain gauge, a system to measure the
flow of the rivers or the volume of water available in the
reservoirs, a system to determine the use of urban water,
etc.?
b) Is water use monitored on the farm?
c) Does the producer know how to calculate the needs for
water on the farm or have technical assistance to do so?
5.2.A Quality of the irrigation water
a) Is the irrigation water used on the property been analyzed
in an authorized laboratory (authorized or accredited) in
order to determine its quality?
b) Does the producer understand the need for using only
good quality water on the agricultural crops?
c) Does the producer know how to interpret the results of a
water analysis or does he have technical assistance to this
end?
d) Is the irrigation water that is used on the property within
the statutory limits permitted for microbiological quality
and heavy metals?
50
Fulfillment
Aspects to review
Yes No
5.2.B Quality of the water for drinking and cleaning
a) Is there sufficient water for consumption by the people who
work on the farm?
b) Is the quality of the drinking water that is used on the
property analyzed periodically in an authorized laboratory
(official or accredited)?
c) Does the producer understand the obligation to use quality
water for human consumption and to pack the products on
the property?
d) The water that is used for consumption and packing of
products in the property is within the limits permitted
quality microbiological and of heavy metals?
5.3 Water storage
a) Is there sufficient water to irrigate the crops on the property
throughout the year?
b) Are there artificial water reserves for irrigation (reservoirs,
tanks, etc.) on the property to meet the needs of the dry
periods?
c1) During periods of lack of water for irrigation, is the
period lower than 5 days?
c2) During periods of lack of water for irrigation, is the
period between 5 and 30 days?
c3) During periods of lack of water for irrigation, is the
period longer than 30 days?
5.4 Protection of water sources
a) Have measures been adopted to protect the water sources
on the property against external contamination?
b) Are the deposits of dung on the property far from the water
sources in order to avoid direct and indirect contact (by
runoff ) between the water and this waste?
c) Are the edges of the water sources on the property
protected by vegetation in order to guarantee the volume
of water?
d) Are the areas surrounding the sources and watercourses on
the farm protected?
6. Crop protection
6.1 Integrated pest management
a) Does the rural producer know how to recognize the main
pests and diseases that affect his agricultural activity?
51
Fulfillment
Aspects to review
Yes No
b) Does the producer know how to identify damage caused by
pests in his activities?
c) Does the property use economic harm as parameter for
applying a plant health treatment?
d) Does the producer develop his productive processes while
respecting the parameters necessary for guaranteeing
quarantine safety?
e) For pest control, are pesticides which are authorized and in
the recommended doses used only?
f) With respect to pest control, is the recommended applica-
tion equipment used?
g) Are there records documenting the presence of pests on the
crops, the level of harm, the pesticides, and the doses used?
h) If records are kept, are these kept for at least 2 years?
6.2 Use of permitted pesticides
a) Does the producer only use the products indicated for the
crops that he has on his property?
b) Does the producer comply with the pre-harvest
intervals that should be observed in the application of
a product?
6.3 Mixture preparation and disposal of surplus application
mix
a) Is the water that is used to prepare the mixture on the
property clean, without suspended materials (or with very
few), odorless, and colorless?
b) Does the producer know what is the pH of the water?
c) Is there a habit on the property of checking the pH of the
water that is to be used for spraying?
d) Is the mixture always prepared in the same place?
e) Does the place where the mixture is prepared suitable for
residue collection?
f) Does the place where the mixture is prepared have
sufficient water for proper cleaning following the pesticide
management activity?
g) Is the residue from the mixture discarded in rivers, streams,
or lakes?
52
Fulfillment
Aspects to review
Yes No
h) Is the excess mixture discarded onto the soil, in a single
place?
i) Does the property have a system for management of
pesticide residues based on technical guidelines?
j) Does the producer wash the equipment in a fixed place
after the application?
k) Does the producer dispose of the cleaning water in the same
location where the residue from the mixture was discarded?
6.4 Calibration of equipment
a) Does the producer keep the technical manual on the
equipment in a safe place and does he understand the
instructions?
b) Has the producer been trained in the management and
calibration of equipment?
c1) Does the producer calibrate the equipment before each
application?
c2) Does the producer calibrate the equipment at least once a
month?
c3) Does the producer calibrate the equipment at least once
during the crop cycle (production)?
c4) Has the producer calibrated the equipment at least once
since purchasing it?
6.5 Protective equipment
a) Do the owner and the workers have the full equipment for
personal protection on the property (boots, gloves, suit, hat
made of waterproof material, glasses and protective mask)?
b) Does the producer know how to use all items of the
personal protective equipment?
c) Does the producer know how to identify which part of the
protective equipment is related to each stage of pesticide
management?
d) Is the protective equipment complete, without tears or
missing parts?
e) Does the producer always use the personal protective
equipment during pesticide management?
53
Fulfillment
Aspects to review
Yes No
f) After application, are the clothes and the protective
equipment that were used washed and dried apart from
other clothes and other instruments?
g) When the useful life of the protective equipment is over, are
the parts discarded in a similar manner as the containers
that contained pesticides?
h) Are the workers trained in the use of this equipment?
i) Do the workers use the personal protective equipment?
6.6 Pesticide storage
a) Is there a repository on the property that is destined
exclusively for pesticide storage?
6.7 Management of empty pesticide containers
a) Are the empty containers washed three times, dried, and
perforated before being sent to a collection center for final
destruction?
b) Are there storage structures for empty containers on the
property?
c) Are the empty and clean containers collected through an
approved collection system by a responsible authority?
d) Are the empty pesticide containers used again after being
washed?
e) Are the empty pesticide containers burned on the property
after being used?
f) Are the empty pesticide containers buried after being used?
g) Are the empty pesticide containers left abandoned after
use?
h) Are the empty containers collected, still dirty, by the urban
garbage collection system or through a similar system?
i) Are the empty containers collected, after cleaning, by
the urban garbage collection system or through a similar
system?
6.8 Pesticide residue
a) Does the producer understand what are pesticide
residues?
b) Does the producer know how to identify the specified
break periods from pesticides that apply to his property?
54
Fulfillment
Aspects to review
Yes No
c) Does the producer respect the break periods that
are indicated on the label and on the pamphlet that
accompany the pesticides?
d) Does the only producer use the products indicated for the
crops that he has on his property?
e) Does the producer respect the recommended product
dose for his crops?
f) Does the producer follow the recommended hygiene
measures after conducting work with pesticides and
before coming into contact with vegetables?
7. Presence of animals on the farm
7.1 Separation of animals in the production area
a) Is contamination by animals (collection of feces) controlled
or is there physical separation between the animals and
the production points?
8. Hygiene and health
8.1 Hygiene procedures
a) Has a vegetable handling protocol been established on the
property?
b) Have the workers been trained and they follow the
protocol?
8.2 Workers health
a) Do the workers have facilities where they can preserve and
consume their food?
b) Is the water that the workers consume potable and does it
meet the standards established by national legislation?
c) Does the farm have disease prevention control plans or
programs for the workers?
d) Have records been kept over the years on the occurrence
of diseases?
e) Does the farm have accident control programs for the
workers?
f) Are records kept on the occurrence of accidents over the
years?
55
Fulfillment
Aspects to review
Yes No
8.3 Sanitary structures
a) Do the farm workers have sanitary structures to which
there is easy access?
b) Do the sanitary structures have chlorinated water for
washing their hands, with soap and towels?
c) Do the workers wash their hands after using the restroom?
d) Do the workers know why they should wash their hands?
e) Are the residual structures provided with a septic tank or
some other technically recommended treatment system?
9. Transport
9.1 Transport of harvested products
a) Does the producer verify the conditions for transportation
before loading his products?
b) Are the vehicles authorized to transport food?
c) During transportation, are records kept of unforeseen
events (delays, equipment failure, loss of coldness, etc.)
d) Does the transporter keep a record of receipt and delivery
of the product?
10. Management of residues and polluting agents
10.1 Solid waste elimination
a) Is the solid waste (with the exception of pesticides) that
is generated on the property collected through a system,
whether public or private?
10.2 Waste reduction and waste recycling
a) Does the property have an environmental management
plan that promotes waste reduction and recycling?
11. Training
a) Do the workers receive training in good agricultural and
environmental practices when they begin to work on the
property?
b) After the initial training, are the workers trained periodically?
c) Are the workers evaluated in order to confirm the
effectiveness of their training?
d) Are training records kept?
56
6.2 Evaluation and monitoring of the application of
good agricultural practices
The following figure shows the basic activities related with evaluation
and monitoring of GAP:
Diagnosis/
evaluation
Execution Prioritization
Planning
Diagnosis/evaluation
57
Prioritization
Once the aspects showing a gap, or those that are critical, have been
identified, both the government and the producers should begin
to prioritize measures to deal with those deficiencies. Prioritization
should be done on the basis of the impact of such deficiencies on the
targets and goals of the country or the farm.
Planning
Execution
Once the improvements are made, the results should be evaluated, i.e. the
respective monitoring should be done. To this end, the same tool that was
used to make the diagnosis is applied, as part of a continuous improve-
ment process.
58
The system is programmed to record each answer according to the
following dimensions of impact:
a) Environmental
b) Worker safety
c) Food safety
d) Economical
59
Figure 6. Figures with results of analyses of indicators evaluated via
the GAP questionnaire, using an integrated approach.
1. History and management of the farm
1
11. Management of r 2. Propagation material and seeds
0,9
esidues and contaminants 0,8
0,7
0,6
0,5
10. Transportation of 0,4
3. Management
harvested products Total 0,3
of soils and
0,2
other substrates
0,1
0
9. Training 4. Fertilization
Environmental Worker
1. History and management of the farm 1. History and management of the farm
1
11. Management of r 2. Propagation material and seeds 1
2. Propagation material and seeds
0,9 11. Management of r 0,9
esidues and contaminants 0,8 esidues and contaminants 0,8
0,7
0,7
0,6
0,6
0,5
10. Transportation of 0,4
3. Management 10. Transportation of
0,5
3. Management
harvested products Total 0,3
of soils and harvested products Total
0,4
of soils and
0,2
other substrates 0,3
other substrates
0,2
0,1
0,1
0
0
9. Training 4. Fertilization 9. Training 4. Fertilization
Safety Economic
1. History and management of the farm 1. History and management of the farm
1
11. Management of r 2. Propagation material and seeds 1
2. Propagation material and seeds
0,9 11. Management of r 0,9
esidues and contaminants 0,8 esidues and contaminants 0,8
0,7
0,7
0,6 0,6
0,5
10. Transportation of 0,4
3. Management 10. Transportation of
0,5
3. Management
of soils and 0,4
harvested products Total 0,3 harvested products Total of soils and
0,3
0,2
other substrates other substrates
0,2
0,1 0,1
0 0
9. Training 4. Fertilization 9. Training 4. Fertilization
60
Information is thus obtained to serve as input for environmental planning of the pro-
duction units, as well as for planning occupational security, food safety, and the eco-
nomic security of the owner.
The next step is the planning phase, in which both the official entities and the rural
producers and technical personnel participate. The items in the questionnaire that
did show an ideal situation are included individually, are analyzed and the factors that
prevented their execution are sought. In order to resolve each item or problem one
or more actions can be proposed, and this should describe in detail how the goal that
was outlined is going to be achieved (figure 7).
It is also important to clarify what factors impeded achievement of the proposed ob-
jectives. Each action can bring together more than one problem, which, by itself, will
require a smaller corrective action on a feasible scale, which may also take the time
scale into consideration, so that the initial problem can be solved. An example of this
process can be seen in the figure 7, where the same example of a problem resolved by
official entities and by the producer.
61
Figure 7. Management matrices for the official entities and rural producers.
Problems found
Item Initial problem Initial action Mitigation (including execution time)
(limitations)
The producer is No trained technical team Prepare a technical team to provide
not able to read available to provide this this training in the next six months
and interpret a type of training
map or sketch
Lack of financial resources Allocate resources immediately
of the farm
to execute the project from other activities or include
resources in the budget for next
year
No priority given to a Establish public - private associa-
training plan for this type of tions that will continue until the
producer end of the second half of 2020
Devise a training plan in 2018 for the
next 5 years
62
B) Example of a management matrix for the actions of the producers.
At the same time, the official entities will have information on GAP
that is standardized and uniform, which will enable for precise analysis
of progress over time.
63
6.5 Recommendations for the implementation
of good agricultural practices
Stage 2. Training: Work is carried out with groups and with proper-
ties that decided to adopt the system. The first step is to prepare sup-
porting material for even the simplest matters, such as how to collect
refuse around the house or to ensure that there is no dung where peo-
ple have to move around. The support material cannot be just a manu-
al or a guide loaded with text. It helps a lot to use posters, illustrations,
symbols, and messages that indicate simply and directly whether a
procedure is good or bad. In communities where a great number of
inhabitants have not had the opportunity to receive formal education
and do not know how to read or write, or speak different languages,
symbols are an excellent mechanism for dissemination, as they make
it possible to associate a figure to an action. In any case, printed ma-
terial by itself is not sufficient. The presence of extension workers is
indispensable to eliminate doubts, provide details, and help achieve
results over set periods of time.
64
Stage 3. Beginning of implementation: Implementation begins
when participants are already aware of the existence of GAP, how
they operate and their objectives in the short, medium and long
term. In this phase, processes can be started that depend on fi-
nancial investment, but this would be subject to the proposed ob-
jectives. The figure of the extension worker begins to take second
place to the greater relevance of the local GAP actors or auditors.
The process of self-management can begin in this phase or in the
next.
Work tools:
Below (figure 8) are some of the tools that can be used in the stages
previously described.
Stage 4.
GAP Guide and assessment or audit sheets (participants and
Self-management
evaluators or auditors).
process
65
cal personnel and with the target audience, and a checklist of the
objectives achieved at each stage, bearing in mind that the final
objective is adaptation of the property/community/region to the
set of GAP.
Working tools
Meetings and written material (ex. GAP Guide) to guide the discus-
sions and the training of divulgators.
66
7. BIBLIOGRAPHY
Codex Alimentarius Commission. 2013. Code of hygienic prac-
tice for fresh fruits and vegetables (online). Rome, Italy. Consulted
on 9 oct. 2015. Available at http://www.fao.org/fao-who-codex-
alimentarius/sh-proxy/en/?lnk=1&url=https%253A%252F%252F-
workspace.fao.org%252Fsites%252Fcodex%252FStandards%252F-
CAC%2BRCP%2B53-2003%252FCXP_053e_2013.pdf.
Daz, A. 2009. Good agricultural practices: guide for small and medi-
um sized agribusiness operators (online). (Agribusiness series: export
handbooks). San Jose, Costa Rica, IICA. Consulted on 7 mar. 2016.
Available at http://repiica.iica.int/docs/b2257i/b2257i.pdf.
67
IPCC (Intergovermental Panel on Climate Change, Switzerland). 2014.
Annex II. Glossary. Mach, KJ; Planton, S; von Stechow, C (eds.). In Core
writing team members; Pachauri, RK; Meyer, LA (eds.). Climate change
2014: synthesis report. Contribution of working groups I, II and III to
the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Cli-
mate Change. Geneva, Switzerland. p. 117-130. Consulted on 9 oct.
2015. Available at https://www.ipcc.ch/pdf/assessment-report/ar5/syr/
SYR_AR5_FINAL_full_wcover.pdf.
68
PHOTOGRAPHS
Regional workshop Good agricultural practices within the context of climate change for resilient
agriculture. 2015. San Jos, Costa Rica.
Working team during the validation of the field guide, together with packagers, producers,
and government authorities. 2016
69
ABOUT THE AUTHORS:
Alejandra Daz. International Specialist in Agricultural Health and
Food Safety and Coordinator of the component of Management of
health and phytosanitary risks for resilient agriculture of IICAs Flagship
Project Resilience and Comprehensive Management of Environmental
Risks for Agricultural Production. Engineer in Food Industries and
Master of Science Degree in Food Technology from the Universidad
Nacional Agraria La Molina, Peru.
70
Inter-American Institute for Cooperation on Agriculture
Headquarters
San Jose, Vazquez de Coronado, San Isidro 11101 Costa Rica
Phone: (+506) 2216 0222 / Fax: (+506) 2216 0233