Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
Britany L. Alford
Kaplan University
Terry Campbell
10/06/2015
Public corruption is generally viewed as an obstacle to the development of a
donor-states have special agendas to fight the problem. Yet in the countries with high
levels of corruption, arguments have been made that because corruption is pervasive, it
has to have some benefit. While definitely not something to be proud of, public
Corruption is seen throughout the world as an issue which effects people in all
areas of the economy. For example; an on duty police officer paying or getting paid by a
prostitute for sex would benefit the both of them. This wrongdoing does several things, it
benefits the officer by pleasing him sexually, he gains monetary value from the prostitute
and she gets off by not going to jail. This will not only allow for this legal crime to
continue but the prostitute is also put at risk of getting raped or killed. Officers are to
serve and protect, not bribe and be dishonest while wearing their badge, officers have
high standards to uphold from both the public and their agency.
Noted in the iDebate message board Corruption is a Western concept and is not
applicable to traditional societies, where corruption does not have such a negative
meaning. Many traditional societies with a gift culture have a different understanding of
civil responsibilities and etiquette. The social structure and political traditions of many
countries are based on the beneficial exchange of rewards for services rendered, and
and relationship building in some parts of the world. It is two-faced for the west to target
creating nations for this same number of supposed majority rules systems are pitifully
In distinctive societies the lines between the satisfactory and inadmissible are
drawn in an unexpected way. On the other hand, there are cutoff points in all social
orders, past which an activity gets to be degenerate and inadmissible. The misuse of
force for private addition and the siphoning off of open or basic assets to private pockets
ought to be illicit and unsuitable in all societies and social orders. When government
officials are called to raise money, they contribute tremendous wholes to make people in
general accept on their liberality. 0n the other hand, they do this with the expectation of
The commitments they make are from people in general trusts. The deceitful
authorities masquerade corruption to show up like it is a gifts theyre giving out while it is
open cash they are utilizing which is misappropriation of open stores adding up to
defilement. They utilize the blessing offering conventions to deceive general society, get
their backing and through defilement they find themselves able to remain in office.
Taking advantage of people in order to get what you want is never a good way of going
against it.
References