Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
College of Engineering
DEPARTMENT OF CHEMICAL ENGINEERING
S.Y 2016-2017
BIOCHEMICAL ENGINEERING
Topic: Transport Phenomena In Bioprocess Systems
Care, Neil Dominic, Pea, Ruel, Reverente, Marianne, De Castro, Mae Ann
_____________________________________________________________________________________
MASS TRANSFER IN BIOPROCESS SYSTEMS
In the biochemical engineering profession, there are various bioprocesses actively involved in the
synthesis and production of biological products. Understanding of all the processes may require basic
knowledge of biology, biochemistry, biotechnology, and real knowledge of engineering processes. Transfer
of oxygen is a major concern in many bioprocesses that require air for microbial growth such as single cell
protein and production of antibiotics. Agitation in a fermentation unit is directly related to oxygen
transported from the gas phase to liquid phase followed by oxygen uptake by the individual microbial cell.
The activities of microorganisms are monitored by the utilization of oxygen from the supplied air and the
respiration quotient. The primary and secondary metabolites in a bioprocess can be estimated based on
projected pathways for production of intracellular and extracellular by-products.
Mass transfer occurs in mixtures containing local concentration variation. For example, when dye is
dropped into a cup of water, mass-transfer processes are responsible for the movement of dye molecules
through the water until equilibrium is established and the concentration is uniform. Mass is transferred from
one place to another under the influence of a concentration difference or concentration gradient in the
system. Gas-liquid mass transfer is extremely important in bioprocessing because many processes are
aerobic, oxygen must first be transferred from gas bulk through a series of steps onto the surfaces of cells
before it can be utilized. The solubility of oxygen within broth is very poor. Therefore, the enhancement of
gas-liquid mass transfer during aerobic cultures and fermentations is always put into priority.
Molecular Diffusion
Molecular diffusion is the movement of component molecules in a mixture under the influence of a
concentration difference in the system. Diffusion of molecules occurs in the direction required to destroy
the concentration gradient. If the gradient is maintained by constantly supplying material to the region of
high concentration and removing it from the region of low concentration, diffusion will be continuous. This
situation is often exploited in mass-transfer operations and bioreaction system.
Ficks Law of Diffusion
Assume that mass transfer of A occurs across area a perpendicular to the direction of diffusion. In
single-phase systems, the rate of mass transfer due to molecular diffusion is given by Fick's law of
diffusion, which states that mass flux is proportional to the concentration gradient:
= =
Ja is the mass flux of component A, N a is the rate of mass transfer of component A, a is the area
across which mass transfer occurs, .-DAB is the binary diffusion coefficient or diffusivity of component
A in a mixture of A and B, Ca is the concentration of component A, and y is distance, d C A / dy is the
concentration gradient, or change in concentration of A with distance.
Mixing As discussed before, turbulence in fluids produces bulk mixing on a scale equal to the
smallest eddy size. Within the smallest eddies, flow is largely streamline so that further mixing must occur
by diffusion of fluid components. Mixing on a molecular scale therefore completely relies on diffusion as
the final step in the mixing process.
Mass transfer across a phase boundary Mass transfer between phases occurs often in
bioprocesses. Oxygen transfer from gas bubbles to fermentation broth, penicillin recovery from aqueous to
organic liquid, and glucose transfer from liquid medium into mould pellets are typical examples. When
different phases come into contact, fluid velocity near the phase interface is significantly decreased and
diffusion becomes crucial for mass transfer across the phase interface.
Film Theory
The two-film theory is a useful model for mass transfer between phases. Mass transfer of solute
from one phase to another involves transport from the bulk of one phase to the phase boundary or interface,
and then from the interface to the bulk of the second phase. The film theory is based on the idea that a fluid
film or mass-transfer boundary layer forms wherever there is contact between two phases. According to the
film theory, turbulence in each fluid dies out at the phase boundary. A thin film of relatively stagnant fluid
exists on either side of the interface; mass transfer through this film is effected solely by molecular
diffusion. The concentration of A changes near the interface as indicated in Figure below, CAI i is the
interfacial concentration of A in the aqueous phase; CA2 i is the interfacial concentration of A in the organic
phase. Most of the resistance to mass transfer resides in the liquid films rather than in the bulk liquid. For
practical purposes it is generally assumed that there is negligible resistance to transport at the interface
itself; this is equivalent to assuming that the phases are in equilibrium at the plane of contact. The difference
between CA1 i and CA2 i at the interface accounts for the possibility that, at equilibrium, A may be more
soluble in one phase than in the other. For example, ifA were acetic acid in contact at the interface with
both water and chloroform, the equilibrium concentration in water would be greater than that in chloroform
by a factor of between 5 and 10. CAI i would then be significantly higher than CA2i.
where NA is the rate of mass transfer of component A, k is the mass-transfer coefficient, a is the area
available for masstransfer, CAo is the bulk concentration of component A away from the phase boundary,
and CAi is the concentration of A at the interface.
Mass transfer coupled with fluid flow is a more complicated process than diffusive mass transfer.
The value of the mass-transfer coefficient reflects the contribution to mass transfer from all the processes
in the system that affect the boundary layer, which depends on the combined effects of flow velocity,
geometry of equipment, and fluid properties such as viscosity and diffusivity. Because the hydrodynamics
of most practical systems are not easily characterized. k cannot be calculated reliably from theoretical
equations. Instead, it is measured experimentally or estimated using correlations available from the
literatures. In general, reducing the thickness of the boundary layer or improving the diffusion coefficient
in the film will result in enhancement of k and improvement in the rate of mass transfer.
Liquid-Solid Mass Transfer
Mass transfer between a moving liquid and a solid is important in biological processing in a variety
of applications. Transport of substrates to solid-phase cell or enzyme catalysts has already been mentioned.
Adsorption of molecules onto surfaces, such as in chromatography, requires transport from liquid phase to
solid; liquid-solid mass transfer is also important in crystallization as molecules move from the liquid to
the face of the growing crystal. Conversely, the process of dissolving a solid in liquid requires liquid-solid
mass transfer directed away from the solid surface.
The concentration of A at the phase boundary is CAi; the concentration of A in the bulk liquid
outside the film is CAo. If a is the liquid-solid interfacial area per unit volume, the volumetric rate of mass
transfer can be determined from the equation:
NA = kL a ( CAo - GAi )
where k L is the liquid-phase mass-transfer coefficient.
These two Eqs indicate that the rate of mass transfer between two phases is not dependent simply on the
concentration difference; the equilibrium relationship is also an important factor.
The driving force for transferring component A out of liquid 1 is the difference between the bulk
concentration CA1 and the concentration of component A in liquid 1 which would be in equilibrium with
concentration CA2 in liquid 2.
Gas-Liquid Mass Transfer
The rate of mass transfer of component A through the gas boundary layer is:
The rate of mass transfer of component A through the liquid boundary layer is:
If we assume that equilibrium exists at the interface, CAGi and CALi can be related. For dilute
concentration of most gases and for a wide range of concentration for some gases, equilibrium
concentration in the gas phase is a linear function of liquid concentration. Therefore:
When solute A is very soluble in the liquid, for example, ammonia, the liquid-phase resistance is small
compared with that posed by the gas interfacial film, therefore
Conversely, if component A is poorly soluble in the liquid, e.g. oxygen, the liquid-phase mass-transfer
resistance dominates and kG a is much larger than kL a, thus:
Oxygen Uptake in Cell Culture
Cells in aerobic culture take up oxygen from broth. The rate of oxygen transfer from gas to
liquid is therefore of prime important, especially at high cell densities when cell growth is likely to be
limited by availability of oxygen.
The solubility of oxygen in aqueous solutions at ambient temperature and pressure is only about 10
ppm.
This amount of oxygen is quickly consumed in aerobic cultures and must be constantly replaced
by sparging.
This is not an easy task because the low solubility of oxygen guarantees that the concentration
difference
( CAL* CAL) is always very small.
Design of fermenters for aerobic operation must take these factors into account and provide
optimum mass-transfer conditions.
Factors affecting
The inherent demand of an organism for oxygen depends primarily on the biochemical nature of the cell
and its nutritional environment. However, when the level of dissolved oxygen in the broth falls below a
certain point, the specific rate of oxygen uptake is also dependent on the oxygen concentration in the broth.
Mass-Transfer Correlations
In general, there are two approaches to evaluating kL and a: calculation using empirical correlations,
and experimental measurement. In both cases, separate determination of k L and a is laborious and
sometimes impossible. It is convenient therefore to directly evaluate the product kL a; the combined term
kL a is often referred to as the mass-transfer coefficient rather than just kL and a.
0.7
k L = 2.0x10-3 G
0.2
(7.1)
V
kLa- the combined mass-transfer coefficient in units of s-1
p - the power dissipated by the stirrer in W
V- the fluid volume in m 3
u G is the superficial gas velocity in m s-I;
Measurement of kLa
Because of the difficulty in predicting kLa in bioreactors using correlations, mass-transfer
coefficients for oxygen are usually determined experimentally. This is not without its own problems
however, as discussed below. Whatever method is used to measure kLa, the measurement conditions should
match those in the fermenter during normal operation. Techniques for measuring kLa have been reviewed
by van't Riet.
Dynamic Method
This method for measuring kLa is based on an unsteady-state mass balance for oxygen. The main
advantage of the dynamicof the dynamic method over the steady-state technique is the low cost of the
equipment needed. There are several different versions of the dynamic method; only one will be described
here.
Take for example, at some time to the broth is de-oxygenated either by sparging nitrogen into the
vessel or by stopping the air flow if the culture is oxygen-consuming, as shown by the figure.
Dissolved-oxygen concentration CAL drops during this period. Air is then pumped into the broth at
a constant flow-rate and the increase in CAL monitored as a function of time. It isimportant that the oxygen
concentration remains above Ccrit so that the rate of oxygen uptake by the cells is independent of oxygen
level. Assuming re-oxygenation of the broth is fast relative to cell growth, the dissolved-oxygen level will
soon reach a steady state value C'ALwhich reflects a balance between oxygen supply and oxygen
consumption in the system. CAL 1 and CAL 2 are two oxygen concentrations measured during re-
oxygenation at times t I and t 2, respectively. We can develop an equation for kEn in terms ofthese
experimental data.
During the re-oxygenation step, the system is not at steady state. The rate of change in dissolved-
oxygen concentration during this period is equal to the rate of oxygen transfer from gas to liquid, minus the
rate of oxygen uptake by the cells:
dC AL
dt
k l a C * AL C AL qo x
(1)
where q o x is the rate of oxygen consumption.
We can determine an expression for qo x by considering the final steady dissolved-oxygen concentration,
C'AL. When CAt ` = C'AL d CAL/d t -- 0 because there is no change in C AL with time. Therefore, from Eq. (1)
qo x k L a C * AL C AL (2)
Assuming kLa is constant with time, we can integrate Eq.(3) between t I and t 2 using the integration rules
described in Appendix D. The resulting equation for kLa is:
C *
AL C AL1
dC AL
kl a
ln
C *
C AL 2
AL (7.5)
dt t 2 t1
kLa can be estimated using two points from Figure below or, more accurately, from several values of (CAL
C *
AL C AL 1 is plotted against (t 2 - t l) as shown in Figure 7.6.2, the
l, t 1) and (CAL 2, t2). When ln
C *
AL C AL 2
slope is kLa. Eq. (7.5) can be applied to actively respiring cultures,or to systems without oxygen uptake. In
the latter case, C*AL=CAL
In aerobic fermentation, oxygen molecules must overcome a series of transport resistances before being
utilized by the cells. Eight mass-transport steps involved in transport of oxygen from the interior of gas
bubbles to the site of intracellular reaction are represented diagrammatically:
Transfer through the bulk gas phase in the bubble is relatively fast.
The gas-liquid interface itself contributes negligible resistance.
The liquid film around is a major resistance to oxygen transfer.
In a well mixed fermenter, concentration gradients in the bulk liquid are minimized and mass-
transfer resistance in this region is small.
Because single cells are much smaller than gas bubbles, the liquid film surrounding each cell is
much thinner than that around the bubbles and its effect on mass transfer can generally be
neglected.
On the other hand, if the cells form large clumps, liquid-film resistance can be significant.
Resistance at the cell-liquid interface is generally neglected.
When the cells are in clumps, intraparticle resistance is likely to be significant as oxygen has to
diffuse through the solid pellets to reach the interior cells. The magnitude of this resistance
depends on the size of the clumps.
Intracellular oxygen-transfer resistance is negligibile because of the small distances involved.
( ) = (1)
We can use Eq. (1) to predict the response of the fermenter to changes in mass-transfer operating
conditions. For example, if the rate of cell metabolism remains unchanged but k La is increased by raising
the stirrer speed to reduce the thickness of the boundary layer around the bubbles, the dissolved-oxygen
concentration C AL must rise in order for the left-hand side to remain equal to the right-hand side.
Similarly, if the rate of oxygen consumption by the cells accelerates while kLa is unaffected, CAL must
decrease.
Further, we can deduce some important relationship for fermenter operations. First, let us estimate the
maximum cell concentration that can be supported by the fermenters oxygen-transfer system. For a given
set of operating conditions, the maximum rate of oxygen transfer occurs when the concentration-
difference driving force (CAL * CAL) is highest, i.e. when the concentration of dissolved oxygen C AL is
zero. Therefore, the maximum cell concentration that can be supported by the mass-transfer function of
the reactor is:
= (2)
Another important parameter is the minimum kLa required to maintain CAL > Ccrit in the fermenter. This
can also be determined as:
( ) = (3)
Polarographic Electrodes
The electrode response time can be determined by quickly transferring the probe from a beaker containing
medium saturated with nitrogen to one saturated with air. The response time is defined as the time taken
for the probe to indicate 63% of the total change in dissolved-oxygen level. For commercially-available
steamsterilisable electrodes, response times are usually 10 ~ 100 s. Polarographic electrodes measure the
partial pressure of dissolved oxygen or oxygen tension in the fermentation broth, not the true dissolved-
oxygen concentration, it is necessary to know the solubility of oxygen in the broth at the temperature and
pressure of measurement.
Effect of Temperature
= 14.161 0.3943 + 7.71 103 2 6.46 105 3
Effect of Solutes
Five resistances are present in series: the thermal boundary layer on the hot-fluid side, a fouling
layer on the hot-fluid side, the pipe wall, a fouling layer on the cold-fluid side, and the cold-fluid
boundary layer. Each fouling layer has associated with it a heat-transfer coefficient; for scale and dirt the
coefficient is called a fouling factor. Let hfh be the fouling factor on the hot-fluid side, and hfc be the
fouling factor on the cold-fluid side. When these additional resistances are present, they must be included
in the expression for the overall heat-transfer coefficient, U. Eq. (8.23) becomes:
1 1 1 1 1
= + + + +
Adding fouling factors in Eq. (X.XX) increases 1/U thus decreasing the value of U.
Accurate estimation of fouling factors is very difficult. The chemical nature of the deposit and its thermal
conductivity depend on the fluid in the tube and the temperature; fouling thickness can also vary between
cleanings. Typical values of fouling factors for various fluids are listed in Table X.XX.
Table: Fouling Factors for Scale Deposits
Solution:
The density ofwater and medium is 1000 kg m -3. Therefore:
1 1000 2.78
= 103 1 =
3600 13
1 1000 6.94
= 253 1 =
3600 13
The heat capacity of water can be taken as 75.4 J gmol-1C -1 for most of the temperature range of
interest (Table B.3). Therefore:
1 1000
= = 75.4 1 1 = 4.19 103
18 1
(a) From Eq. (8.31) for the hot fluid:
= 2.78 4.19 103 (121 30) = 1.06 106 = 1060
(b) For the cold fluid, from Eq. (8.31)
1 106 1
= + = 15 + = 51.5
6.94 1 (4.19 103 1 1 )
The exit water temperature is 52C.
Eq. (8.31) can also be applied to heat removal from a reactor for the purpose of temperature control. At
steady state, the temperature of the hot fluid, e.g. fermentation broth, does not change; therefore the left-
hand side of Eq. (8.31) is zero. If energy is absorbed by the cold fluid as sensible heat, the energy-balance
equation becomes:
( ) = (8.32)
To use Eq. (8.32) for bioreactor design we must know Q. Q is found by considering all significant heat
sources and sinks in the system; an expression involving Q for fermentation systems:
= + (6.12)
Where is the rate of heat absorption or evolution due to metabolic reaction, is the mass flow
rate of evaporated liquid leaving the system, is the latent heat of evaporation, and Ws is the rate of
shaft work done on the system. For exothermic reactions A/-Irx n is negative, for endothermic reactions
is positive. In most fermentation systems the only source of shaft work is the stirrer; therefore Ws
is the power P dissipated by the impeller. Eq. (6.12) represents a considerable simplification of the energy
balance. It is applicable to systems in which heat of reaction dominates the energy balance so that
contributions from sensible heat and heats of solution can be ignored. In large insulated fermenters, heat
produced by metabolic activity is by far the dominant source of heat; energy dissipated by stirring may
also be worth considering. The other heat sources and sinks are relatively minor and can
generally be neglected.
At steady state dE/dt= 0 and Eq. (6.12) becomes:
= + (8.33)
Once Q has been estimated, Eq. (8.32) is used to evaluate unknown operating conditions as shown in
Example 8.2.
Solution:
Rate of heat generation by aerobic cultures is calculated directly from the oxygen demand. Approximately
460 kJ heat is released for each gmol oxygen consumed. Therefore, the metabolic heat load is:
460 1 1000 1
= 1.5 3 1503 = 898 = 898
32 1 3600
is negative because fermentation is exothermic. The rate of heat dissipation by the agitator is:
1 3 1503 = 150
Q can then be calculated from (8.33)
= (898 + 150) = 1048
The density of the cooling water is 1000 kg m-3; therefore:
3 1 1000
= 60 = 16.7
3600 13
The heat capacity of water is 75.4 J gmol-1C 1. Therefore:
1 1000
= 75.4 = 4.19 103
18 1
Equation 8.32 can then be applied and solving for Tco:
1048 103 1
= + = 10 + = 25
16.7 1 (4.19 103 1 1 )
The water outlet temperature is 25C