IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRIGNIA

ALEXANDRIA DIVISION

JANICE WOLK GRENADIER Case No. 1:17 cv 00280

Plaintiff

v.

James C. Clark
Defendant
Motion for Subpoenas

Comes Now Janice Wolk Grenadier requests Subpoenas. Plaintiff a Pro Se Poor persona has been
discriminated since September 2007, 10 years RAPED of all her Constitutional Rights in the STATE
and FEDERAL Courts. That the Judges have had tunnel vision so as to ignore the CRIMINAL:
activity of there own. That the Cover Up of a criminal spree of Divorce lawyer Ilona Grenadier
Heckman due to her money and power is obvious yet the Judiciary, the Government and the Elected
Officials have decided they are going to do what ever it takes to protect her and each other for
friendship, bribery and other things. It is all well documented even with all discovery being denied to
Plaintiff.
The law and rules are clear you all are a self reporting group of people and even when involved in a
case, or representing an attorney or Judge have the obligation of reporting that person or persons. But,
as long as you all agree to cover up for each other then you can continue your enterprise of denying all
DUE PROCESS to the Pro Se Poor litigant.
That the Retaliation and Retribution towards Pro Se litigants or to anyone who stands up and speaks
out about the criminal enterprise of our Government, Elected Officials and Judiciary is to KILL THEM
as you have done to me. To do everything you can to deny any justice as Judge Clark stated clearly
For Friendship.
That under RULE 45 Local and Federal states clearly no subpoena should be denied by the Clerk.
That a Judge does have the right to deny the Governor, the Attorney General and there BUDDIES:
other Judges. I have these three being subpoenaed, That I have been denied all discovery and open
court hearings in the Federal Court System in the last 4 years.
That Plaintiff expects this court and this opponents lawyer to do as has been done in the past and
ignore the Criminal Acts and Actions that Plaintiff has proof of and have the back door agreement with
the Judge to . use tunnel vision and ignore the TRUTH as Judge Kenny did and many others.

1
The following are being subpoenaed to show the collusion in the Cover Up of Judge Clark. They also
were involved in the Retaliation and Retribution of KILLING Janice Wolk Grenadier, so Divorce
Lawyer Ilona Grenadier Heckman could steal from Sonia Grenadier the mother of Judge Albert
Grenadier and Aunt to her second husband attorney and founding partner of Keller Heckman Jerome
Jerry Heckman who has passed.
That Plaintiff with being denied discovery by Judge Clark for 4 years is now subpoenaing the
following to support her argument that this court under the Rules of the Supreme Court of the United
States of America and Plaintiffs Constitutional Rights of Due Process will be able to show this court
that they do have Jurisdiction and rule 12 is not applicable as an argument as the criminal acts and
actions are clear et al. That Plaintiff will go into the law etc in her response due on May 2, 2017,
The Following Subpoenas are attached:
Governor Terry McAuliffe Donald Curry
Attorney General Mark Herring Yoav Katz
Judge Donald Haddock Edward Davis
Judge Lisa Kemler James Bodie
Judge Richard Bowen Potter Ret James Michael McCauley
Judge James McGrath Ret Jeff Goldberg
Judge Nolan Dawkins Joe Defeo
Judge James Clark Dave Albo
Judge Brian Kenny Brian Moran
Judge Beryl A. Howell Christopher Spera
Judge Reggie Walton Ann Schmidt
Judge Gerald Lee Howard Bierman
Judge Leonia Brinkema Ilona Ely Freedman Grenadier Heckman
Judge T.S. Ellis III Ben DiMuro
Judge Merrick Garland Michael Weiser
Justice Donald Lemons S. Mohsin Reza
Joseph Guzinski Heba Carter
Thomas P. Gorman H. Carter Land
Diane Fiske Craig Parker
Katherine Baldwin Burnett Judge John Tran

2
Andrea Mosley M Vaccaco
Mayor Allison Silberberg BL. Evans
Jonathan Termer Officer Germat
James L. Banks James Comey
Ed Semonian Marcus Wilson
Bryan Porter Captain Williams
Randy Sengel Lt Rea
Julie Goble Dana Lawhorne
P. Taylor Hunt Burke
That many of the above were subpoenaed for documents or to show up at the Grand Jury or a Court
hearing and never showed up and Judge Clark ignored the acts and actions. Some of them are in a
position of power and said they would look into it and didnt. But, due to there Oath of Office and
responsibilities of the Professional Code of Ethics ignored the Criminal Acts and Actiosn of Divorce
Lawyer Ilona Grenadier Hackmans Criminal Spree.
That the Judges have the information and have worked in collusion to Cover Up for Judge Clark and
for each other.
That the Subpoenas are clear the information to be delivered to Janice / Plaintiff through e-mail or
USPS should be directly or indirectly involving Sonia Grenadier, Janice Grenadier or Grenadier
Investment Corp. That in doing this she has limited that information to what pertains to the issues
being Covered Up, and that will show if there was a collusion with Judge Clark. That Judge Clark
denied several of this information in the last 4 years denying Constitutional rights of Due Process and
Discovery,
Discovery , in the law of the United States and other countries, is a pre-trial procedure in a lawsuit in
which each party, through the law of civil procedure , can obtain evidence from the other party or
parties by means of discovery devices such as a request for answers to interrogatories , request for
production of documents , request for admissions and depositions . Discovery can be obtained from
non-parties using subpoenas . When a discovery request is objected to, the requesting party may seek
the assistance of the court by filing a motion to compel discovery. Plaintiff has been denied all
discovery by Judge Clark.

The Fifth Amendment says to the federal government that no one shall be "deprived of life,
liberty or property without due process of law." The Fourteenth Amendment , ratified in
1868, uses the same eleven words, called the Due Process Clause, to describe a legal
obligation of all states. Plaintiff has been denied all Due Process in courts associated with
the Judges subpoenaed.

3
Rights associated with a fair trial are explicitly proclaimed in Article 10 of the Universal
Declaration of Human Rights , the Sixth Amendment to the United States Constitution , and Article 6
of the European Convention of Human Rights , as well as numerous other constitutions and
declarations throughout the world. There is no binding international law that defines what is not a fair
trial; for example, the right to a jury trial and other important procedures vary from nation to nation.

Relief Requested: all Subpoenas be signed by the Clerk as required by Rule 45, and as Plaintiff has IFP
be delivered by the Marshalls or made available to Plaintiff promptly to arrange to have them served.

April 21, 2017

Respectfully Submitted,

Janice Wolk Grenadier

15 W. Spring Street
Alexandria, VA 22301
202-369-7178
jwgrenadier@gmail.com

CERTIFICATION: I declare under penalty and perjury: That (1) No attorney has prepared or assisted in the
preparation of this document. Janice Wolk Grenadier Name of Pro Se Party.
_______________________________
April 21, 2017
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

Where is Janice / Plaintiff on April 21, 2017 will sent through e-mail, hand deliver, or USPS mail to:

Margeaux. S. Serrano,
202 North Ninth Street
Richmond, VA 23219
804-786-2071
mserrano@oag.state.va.us