Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
relationships
Thuong Phat Tang, Xiaorong Fu, Qinghong Xie
The study examines the influence of functional conflicts on the innovation and responsive
capabilities in channel relationships by triggering inter-organizational knowledge sharing.
Further, it explores the moderating effects of conflict frequency and relationship quality on the
relationships between functional conflict, knowledge sharing and the organizational
capabilities. Thus, an input-process-output model of the inter-organizational learning
relationship has been developed.
Hypothesis:
The following hypotheses were logically deducted from the theoretical discussions presented in
the article:
1. Functional conflict has a positive influence on inter-organizational knowledge sharing.
According to organization theory, a conflict encourages the organization to search for
additional information to solve the problem. Both the parties involved in the conflict
focus on achieving a common goal and enhanced mutual trust. This is only possible
through mutual exchange of information and knowledge between both the parties
involved
2. Conflict frequency negatively moderates the relationship between functional conflict and
inter-organizational knowledge sharing.
Earlier literature on conflicts indicate that as the frequency of conflicts increases,
members perception about interaction negatively affects the satisfaction levels of
members. In such cases, even though the functional conflict encourages knowledge
sharing, the dissatisfaction caused due to higher conflict frequency creates a huge
barrier for sharing knowledge.
3. a. Knowledge sharing is positively related to channel members responsive capability.
Sharing of knowledge allows greater flexibility for both the parties to respond to the
challenges caused due to the rapid changes in market and environment.
b. Knowledge sharing is positively related to channel members innovation capability
The process of knowledge sharing encourages the channel members to actively explore
new methods, evaluate alternatives and provide different perspectives to solve the
problem. Thus, it creates new knowledge and has a positive influence on the innovation
capability of the channel members.
4. Relationship quality positively moderates the relationship between functional conflict and
knowledge sharing.
During conflicts, a higher level of relationship quality helps members to overcome
communication barriers and enhances mutual adaption and understanding. A strong
relationship creates mutual trust which makes the channel members to forgo short-
term benefits. Thus, it acts as a strong stimulus to share more knowledge.
5. a. Relationship quality negatively moderates the relationship between knowledge sharing
and innovation capability
b. Relationship quality negatively moderates the relationship between knowledge sharing
and responsive capability.
Channel members in high-quality relationship are bound by the existing relationship
rules and are unwilling to break them. In such cases, channel members form closed
networks. This encourages knowledge sharing but, there is no creation of new
knowledge. A high-quality relationship results in sharing of homogenous market
information and makes the firms less flexible to change. Thus, it negatively affects both
the innovation capability and the responsive capability of organizations.
Findings:
The data analysis of the above-mentioned empirical study provides the following conclusions:
1. The functional conflict has a positive influence on knowledge sharing behaviour of
channel members.
2. Frequency of functional conflicts weakens the positive influence of functional conflict on
knowledge sharing.
3. Knowledge sharing has a positive influence on the marketing capability of the firm,
which is positively related to the innovation capability of the organization. Thus,
knowledge sharing fully mediates the relationship between the innovation capability
and conflict. The relationship between the organizations responsive capability and
conflict is only partially mediated by knowledge sharing.
4. Relationship quality is found to negatively moderate the relationship between
knowledge sharing and innovation capability. However, its effect on the relationship
between knowledge sharing and responsive capability is not significant.