Sei sulla pagina 1di 10

USER GUIDE FOR THE ITEM ANALYSIS TEMPLATE Balajadia 2014

General Directions:
1. Supply the "Worksheet" heading with the necessary data for Division, District, School, Subject, Grade-Section, Exam Title, Period, School Year, Name of Teacher.
2. Arrange checked and scored test papers from highest to lowest scorers.
3. Separate the highest 27% and the lowest 27%. Indicate the total number of students and the number of highest 27% in the "Worksheet" accordingly.
4. Tally the responses of students in the highest 27% (vertical) per item number (horizontal) in the yellow cells. Encode "1" for a correct answer and "0" for a wrong answer. Please, note that if you leave
student 1 blank on a particular item, it means that there are no data for that item.
5. Do step 4 for the lowest 27% in the pink cells.
6. Click the "Main Report" tab below to check the final report ready for interpretation. There is nothing to modify in this page.

Guide for Interpretation


1. Accept as it is. - No revision is needed because the level of difficulty and the discriminating power are enough. Retain the item and can be used again in future exams.
2. Accepted with very slight revision. - You can right away accept and retain the item or make little changes depending on the level of difficulty.
3. Accepted with slight revision. - The item is retained with slight increase or decrease of difficulty as regards the P.
4. May be accepted with minor revision. - The item may be retained or discarded as how you personally evaluate it. If retained, the level of difficulty and choices may be changed.
5. Major revision on the stem / choices. - If you think the item will be ratained, paraphrase the stem and replace the choices which no one chose for an answer.
6. Needs major revision or discarded. - Total paraphrasing of the stem and replacement of non-selected choices should be made. Better yet, discard the item.
7. Totally discard. - The item has to be discarded because it is either too easy or too difficult and is unable to distinguish the low performers from the high performers.
Notes: There are locked cells which you cannot modify to totally prevent errors and misencoding.The "Main Report" sheet is protected, therefore, no midification is necessary.

Instruction for writing the descriptive analysis


A. On the difficulty level of items
1. Group together the items having the same difficulty levels and infer on the topics or competencies the students achieved.
2. Highlight the items of "moderate difficulty" and explain that these items can challenge the students enough to think analytically and critically. Nitko and Brookhart (2011) explain that items with
moderate difficulty are better than those which are very easy or very difficult. In this way, students are genuinely tested of their analytical and critical thinking skills.
3. You may also describe easy items to be indicators of most learned concepts, likewise, difficult items signal the least learned competencies.
B. On the discrimination indices of items
1. Group together the items having the same discrimination indices and infer on the item on its ability to distinguish who thinks more analytically or don't.
2. Items that are very discriminating should be emphasized to discuss the credibility of the test in eliciting authentic learning abilities of students.
3. You may also mention about those which are discriminating and moderately discriminating to be reconsidered after some necessary revision.
4. Infer on the resulting items being non-discriminating and questionable.
C. On the final decision
1. Group together the items having the same decisions and infer on each item on its validity, reliability, and objectivity.
2. Commend the items that are to be accepted and retained right away.
3. Cite examples of revision of some items if there are.
4. Write a general impression of the entire test.

Printing and submission


1. Print the "Main Report" without any modification. Study the table(s).
2. Click the "Interpretation" tab below and accomplish your discussion as specified therein. Print.
3. Submit your report in the following order:
3.1 Main Report
3.2 Interpretation and Desriptive Analysis Report
3.3. Copy of the TOS and Test Paper with correct answers.
Division: TARLAC CITY District: NORTH A School: BALIBAGO PRIMERO INTEGRATED SCHOOL

Subject / Grade - Section Mathematics / Grade 7- AGONCILLO Total Number of Students: 48


Exam Title / Period / School Year First Periodical Test / SY 2017-2018 Number of highest scorers (27%): 13
Name of Teacher Mr. Juan C. Dela Cruz, Jr. Number of lowest scorers (27%): 13
Balajadia 2014
HIGHEST SCORERS LOWEST SCORERS
Total Total
item/SN 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Correct item/SN 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Correct

1 1
2 2
3 3
4 4
5 5
6 6
7 7
8 8
9 9
10 10
11 11
12 12
13 13
14 14
15 15
16 16
17 17
18 18
19 19

Balajadia 2014
20 20
21 21
22 22
23 23
24 24
25 25
26 26
27 27
28 28
29 29
30 30
31 31
32 32
33 33
34 34
35 35
36 36
37 37
38 38
39 39
40 40
41 41
42 42
43 43
44 44
45 45
46 46
47 47
48 48
49 49
50 50

Balajadia 2014
Total>>> 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total>>> 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Balajadia 2014

Balajadia 2014
Department of Education - Region III
TARLAC CITY
NORTH A
BALIBAGO PRIMERO INTEGRATED SCHOOL

ITEM ANALYSIS IN Mathematics / Grade 7- AGONCILLO

First Periodical Test / SY 2017-2018


Exam Title / School Year

Total Students (100%): Name of Teacher: Mr. Juan C. Dela Cruz, Jr.
48 Highest Scorers (27%): 13 Lowest Scorers (27%): 13 26 page 1/2

Total Total Difficulty Index Discrimination Index


Total Correct
Item # Correct Correct Decision
(high+low) P Interpretation D Interpretation
(high) (low)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
Balajadia 2014
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50

Summary of Results
1.Accepted as it is.. 0 4.May be accepted with minor revision 0 7.Totally discard.. 0

page 2/2
2.Accepted with very slight revision 0 5.Major revision on the stem or choices. 0
3.Accepted with slight revision. 0 6.Needs major revision or be discarded.. 0
Signature/Date:
page 2/2
Signature/Date:
Item analysis in: Mathematics / Grade 7- AGONCILLO First Periodical Test / SY 2017-2018 Mr. Juan C. Dela Cruz, Jr.

Balajadia 2014
Department of Education - Region III
TARLAC CITY
NORTH A
BALIBAGO PRIMERO INTEGRATED SCHOOL

ITEM ANALYSIS IN Mathematics / Grade 7- AGONCILLO


First Periodical Test / SY 2017-2018
Exam Title / School Year

Interpretation and Descriptive Analysis


Test Difficulty

Test Discrimination

Final Impression

Analyzed and reported by:


Mr. Juan C. Dela Cruz, Jr.
Teacher

Potrebbero piacerti anche