Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
A Survey of
Emissions and Controls for
Hazardous and Other Pollutants
by
Dr. A. J. Goldberg
diameter particles).
ii
TABLE OF CONTENTS
LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS iv
ACKNOWLEDGMENT vi
SECTION I INTRODUCTION 1
SECTION V SUMMARY 35
SECTION VI BIBLIOGRAPHY 37
iii
LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS
iv
LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS (Cont'd)
V
ACKNOWLEDGMENT
vi
I. INTRODUCTION
its seriousness becomes more evident and its dimensions loom larger.
In particular the dangers associated with long term low level exposure
general population.
1
generally present in the atmosphere at sufficient levels to consti-
of the respiratory tract to reach the air spaces of the lung. More-
only because these substances are more potent but because they per-
sist in the atmosphere, are more easily respirable and more readily
2
Indications of this are shown in Figures 1 and 2. Figure 1
which point there is a maximum retention rate over 75%. More than
retained while only a small amount of those particles less than .25
microns or more than 3.0 microns are retained. (It should be noted
Fine particles may also interfere with solar radiation and can cause
about which more will be said below, it seems incumbent upon EPA to
3
1.0
NASOPHARYNGEAL
0.9
0.8
A
~
0.7
E-t
H
ti)
0 0.6
p..
~ 0.5
~
t: o. 4
~r:,:.. 0.3
0.1
o.o--..................- -
10-2 1012
MASS MEDIAN DIAMETER, MICRON
*DATA FROM NAPCA - AIR QUALITY CRITERIA FOR PARTICULATE MATIER, p. 115.
FIGURE 1*
FRACTION OF PARTICLES DEPOSITED IN THE THREE
RESPIRATORY TRACT COMPARTMENTS AS A FUNCTION
OF PARTICLE DIAMETER
4
RETENTION(%)
80
~ ....
~
70 "'
" ' ......, l
60
\
50 '\
40
'\
30
20
' \
\
--....
"' .....
10
0
,
l
' -- -.._ .....
.25,50. 7511.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0
PARTICLE SIZE (MICRONS)
FIGURE 2
RETENTION OF PARTICULATE MATTER IN
LUNG IN RELATION TO PARTICLE SIZE*
5
be as precise as possible in establishing quantitative standards
target air quality level. Having accomplished this, we can then pro-
ceed to the third step in the R&D problem definition process which is
essary technology.
three preliminary steps, and delineates the effort yet needed. Thus
far, the bulk of our efforts have been devoted to the first stage
sions as well as some limited chemical and physical data and in-
several pollutants for which NAS or other surveys have been published.
7
II. SCOPE AND MAGNITUDE OF EMISSIONS OF POLLUTANTS
pollutant was being emitted to the atmosphere and how these emis-
200 industries.
arsenic lead
asbestos manganese
barium mercury
beryllium nickel
boron POM
cadmium selenium
chlorine tin
copper vanadium
fluorides zinc
represent the best data from the literature sources cited in Table 1
8
the data are approximate at best, not only because completeness is
certain industries.
only on the number and sizes of the sources in a given locality, but
below.
9
can yield a variety of pollutant materials in relatively large
sions from open hearth furnaces head the list of industrial sources
although these are far less than those created by open burning. In
10
Principal Polluting Industries
Principal
Industry Emissions Pollutants
Iron and Steel 103,822 Ba, Cd, Cu, Pb, Mg, Sn, V,
Zn, Fluorides
Non-Ferrous Smelting 68,002 As, Cd, Cu, Fluorides, Pb,
Mg, Hg, Se, Zn
Industrial Power and 127,839 As, Ba, Be, B, Cd, Cr, Cu,
Heat Generation Fluorides, Pb, Mg, Hg, fil,
POM, Se, Sn, Va, Zn
Residential Power and 121,714 As, Ba, Be, B1 Cr, Cu,
Heat Fluorides, Pb, Mg I Hg,, !!,! 1
POM 1 Se, Sn, Va, Zn
Chlorine Production and 56,370 Cl, Hg
related mfg
Metallurgical Coking 43,380 POM
Incineration 34,307 B, Cd, Cu, Fluorides, Mg,
Hg, POM, Se, Zn
Phosphate and related 13,330 Fluorides
fluoride emitting
industries
for each industry, the number of sources in each category, the total
11
nature of the pollutants in each case. Although the data on popu-
emissions are comprised of gases and both gross and fine particulates.
12
It should be reemphasized at this point that the hazards posed
the respiratory system to enter deep into the lungs and their rate
based on the assumption that the device which now gives the best results,
all sources. While this is generally not the case because sources
13
way offer us some insight into the approximate level of control
used.
The last column of Table 5 shows that generally after the application
to a situation.
application of the best control devices now in use are open hearth
furnaces in the iron and steel industry, blast furnaces used in the
14
of these cases, the total emissions would be very greatly reduced if
emitted.
remain.
municipal incinerators
non-ferroalloys
2. Processes whose residual emissions after application of best
asphalt blowing
15
blast furnace - primary lead, ferroalloys (also
open burning
metallurgical coke
is unknown.
Open burning
domestic incineration
chlorine liquefaction
16
In view of the different situations represented above we will
and welfare.
17
III. DEFINING CONTROL SYSTEM NEEDS
must first clarify the goals which are to be met in terms of pol-
know the maximum or most probable safe ambient air quality levels
the least stringent, and the most probable standards that are likely
anticipated standards.
the responses are given in Table 14 along with comparable data for
solicited in the survey after they have had time to review the
feedback,
19
levels be found which will not cause the desired ambient concentrations
which cooperation is guaranteed not only from all sources that may
affect air quality in a region but also from the environment. Lacking
emissions.
targets for the sources in our study. To gain some quick insights
PRESUMED
SAFE LEVEL
FOR LEAD
M-
E
"'3
II)
z
0
j::
:
1-
.5 -----------------------...IL---l
z
w
u
z
0
u
0
<(
w
-I SH= 500 (HI
>
-I FaT = 12,000 (LI
<(
0
w SH= 500 (HI
C,
: .1 FaT = 35,000 (HI
w
>
<(
:E
::::>
:E
I SH= STACK HEIGHT
X
<(
.05
I FaT = FLOW RATE
:!2: (1000 scfm) X
I TEMP. CHANGE
I AT TOP OF STACK
I
UPPER
BOUND
I
01 ...___.'---'----~-..__....___._........_--&,.._~_..__.......__._.._j
100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000
PARTICULATE EMISSIONS FOR LEAD SMEL TEAS (TONS/YEAR I
FIGURE 3
COMPARISON OF PRESUMED SAFE AND AMBIENT AIR CONCENTRATIONS
OF POLLUTANTS FROM SELECTED SOURCES (LEAD SMELTERS)
21
information is available which permits us to treat each of the smelters
in this county we have chosen to represent the data for the generic
issue which bears directly on the nature of the R&D program, namely,
subject of available control systems and the extent to which they might
22
The usual range of particle sizes effectively removed by
this survey.
23
IV. OTHER POLLUTANT PROBLEMS
A. Hydrocarbons
Hydrocarbon Emissions
Petroleum refining
Chemical manufacturing
Coal coking
24
Fuel Burning
Waste disposal
Food processing
Dry cleaning
Printing
1. Petroleum Refining
Condensation of emissions
2. Chemical Plants
Hydrocarbon collection
25
4. Waste Duposal
Good incineration procedures
SanLtary landfill
S. Food Processing
Scrubbers
Condensers
Afterburners
Incineration
Absorption processes
Condensation
Further definition of the nature of the emission problems is
26
The polynuclear organic materials are found in the atmosphere
penetrate the normal barriers and are retained in the lung. Per-
on the skin or entered into the respiratory tract and the rate of
carcinogens, other organic compounds are emitted into the air which
major sources of carcinogenic agents. The emission data for benzo (a)
pyrene, one of the key carcinogens is shown in Table 10. The impli-
27
(2) Efficient coal combustion in industrial-process boilers
formation.
tries, but these constitute only about 5% of the problem. Over 85%
include:
The brief resume just given does no more than identify some of
the areas of concern and hints at the scope of the problem. Further
problem definition is required including analysis of the emission
28
distribution and character, the efficacy of existing controls and
the delineation of approaches to the problem. Ah y d rocarbon study
along the lines of the one now in progress for hazardous pollutants
is proposed.
B. Odors
Animal Odors
Restaurants
Bakeries
Paint spraying
Commercial solvents
Hydrogen sulfide
Sulfur dioxide
Ammonia
Fertilizer plants
Plastic manufacturing
Foundry Odors
Core-oven odors
Smelting
JO
Odors from Combustion of Waste
Open-dump fires
Refinery Odors
Mercaptans
Sewage Odors
31
tabulated in Table 11. For each operation typical odor control equip-
ment is also indicated along with the resultant odor concentrations and
odor emission rates. Odor removal efficiencies vary among the various-
I Offensive trades)
51% controlled
(animal processing)
IV Metal industry
(foundries, galvanizing) 55% controlled
32
Because of the severity of the problem and the large number of
producing both edible and inedible products. The emissions from these
plants vary widely depending on the raw material used and the type of
units which are almost completely enclosed cause fewer odor emissions
33
the broad outlines of the odor emissions problem in somewhat analogous
fashion to the effort in the hydrocarbon area. Based on this it is
hoped that we can proceed with a problem definition study which will
reveal specific needs for R&D in all pertinent areas.
34
V. SUMMARY
The data presented herein show that the ferrous and non-ferrous
matter, which points up the need for special efforts to develop control
between the source and the control system need to be resolved before
35
VI. BIBLIOGRAPHY
NUMBER DOCUMENT
37
BIBLIOGRAPHY (CONT'D)
NUMBER. DOCUMENT
-30
31
Manganese, APTD 69-39, PB 188-079
38
BIBLIOGRAPHY (CONT'D}
NUMBER DOCUMENT
39
BIBLIOGRAPHY (CONT'D)
NUMBER DOCUMENT
40
BIBLIOGRAPHY (CONT'D)
NUMBER DOCUMENT
41
BIBLIOGRAPHY (CONT'd)
NUMBER DOCUMENT
42
BIBLIOGRAPHY (CONT'D)
NUMBER DOCUMENT
43
BIBLIOGRAPHY (CONT'D)
NUMBER DOCUMENT
44
BIBLIOGRAPHY (CONT'D)
NUMBER DOCUMENT
45
BIBLIOGRAPHY (CONT'D)
NUMBER DOCUMENT
46
BIBLIOGRAPHY (CONT'D)
NUMBER DOCUMENT
47
BIBLIOGRAPHY (CONT'D)
NUMBER DOCUMENT
48
BIBLIOGRAPHY (CONT'D)
NUMBER DOCUMENT
49
PAGE NOT
AVAILABLE
DIGITALLY
TABLE 2
ORDERING OF EMITTERS
BY OPERATION
SOURCE
56
79. Primary Mercury 55
80. Laboratory Use of Mercury 51
81. Paint Manufacture 42
82. Use of Insulating Cement 25
83. Welding Rods Consumption 23
84. Barton Process, Secondary Lead 20
85. Cotton Ginning 19
86. Asbestos Testiles 18
87. Recovery Furnace, Pulp and Paper 15
88. Spray-on Fire Proofing 15
89. Soap & Detergent Manufacture 13
90. Rotary Furnace 12
91. Secondary Mercury 11
92. Cadmium Paint Pigments 11
93. Refractory Bricks 7
94. Scrap Metal Preparation - Secondary Non-Ferrous Metal 5
95. Beryllium Alloys and Compounds 5
96. Vanadium Chemicals 4
97. Cadmium-Barium Stabilizers 3
98. Miscellaneous Arsenic Chemicals 3
99. Electrical Apparatus Manufacture 3
100. Miscellaneous Copper Metals & Alloys 2
101, Instrument Manufacture 2
102. Pharmaceuticals 2
103. Dental Apparatus 1
104. Cadmium-Nickel Batteries NEG
105. Miscellaneous Cadmium Products NEG
106. Fertilizer Application NEG
57
TABLE 3
NUMBER OF SOURCE LOCATIONS AND GENERAL EMISSION CHARACTERISTICS (l)
A. OPERATIONS CONTRIBUTING 90% OF HAZARDOUS POLLUTANTS
Gas Fluorides
Open Hearth Furnace Iron & Steel
(no oxygen
lance) 604 Ba, Pb, Mn, Hg, Sn, V,
Zn oxides, Fluorides,
POM
Fluorides, HF
Ba, Pb, Mn, Mg, Sn, V,
(with oxygen Zn oxides, POM
lance) Gas Fluorides, HF
Blast Furnace Iron & Steel 140 P,PF, Gas As, Cd, Mn, Hg, Ni, V,
Zn oxides, Fluorides,
POU
Ferro-Alloys 53 3.2 P,PF Mn, Ni, Zn oxides, POM
Secondary Pb 64 47.8 P,PF,Gas As, Pb oxides, POM,
Fluorides
Primary Pb 10 0.3 P,PF' Gas As, Cd, Pb oxides, POM
Fluorides
Secondary Cu 20 19.3 P,PF, Gas As, Cd, Zn
Roasting Primary Cu 19 0.6 p Cu , POM , As , Cd ,
Fluorides, Pb, Se
Primary Zn 17 0.5 Cd, Fluorides, Pb, POM
Se, Zn
Small Boilers, Oil
(Residential, Commercial) Resident Fuel 44000 Ba, Be, Cr, Cu, Pb, Mn,
Hg, Ni , PO~, Se, Sn, V,
Zn
(1) Source: The MITRE Corporation (2) P - Particulates
Preliminary Results PF- Fine Particulates (3) Data show total population of large
EPA Contract No. 68-01-0438 cities near to known sources.
TABLE 3
(2) P Particulates
PF - Fine Particulates
Stoker Coal Boiler, Industrial 124,000 P,PF As, Ba, Be, B, Cr,
Industrial Fuel Cu, Fluorides, Pb,
111n, Hg , Ni , POM, Se ,
Sn, V, Zn
Sintering Iron & Steel P,Gas Fluorides, Metal
Oxides, Alkalis
Primary Zn 17 0,5 P,Gas Zn, Pb, Cd, As,
Fluorides
Primary Pb 10 0,3 P,Gas As, Cd, Fluorides,
Pb, Se
Glass Manufacture Glass 249 P,PF As, Ba, B, Se, Zn, Pb
0'
0 Manufacture No Oxides, Fluorides
Hazardous
Except when Fe , 03 possible, POM
Fining, 2
Oxidizing,
Color Agents
Added
Barium Chemicals Barium
Chemicals 11 1.1 P,PF Ba, POM
(2) p - Particulates
PF - Fine Particulates
(3) Data show total Population of large cities
near to known sources
TABLE 3
Paint, Varnish, Paint, MFG P,PF 1 Gas Ba, Hg, POM, Se, Zn
etc,, MFG
Insulating Cement, Insulating p Asbestos, Cr
Installation Cement
Recovery Furnace Kraft Pulp 35 P,PF,Gas Asbestos, Cr, Hg, POH
Hilling
Fire Proofing Fire Proofing p Asbestos, Cr
Installation
Beryllium Fabrication Be Fabrication p Be
Instrument Manufacture Instrument MFG Gas Hg
a- Electrical Apparatus Electrical AP Gas Hg
w
Dental Preparations, Dental Prep Gas Hg
Cons
Pharmaceuticals Use Pharmaceuticals Gas Hg
TABLE 4
PARTICLE SIZE DISTRIBUTION FOR EMISSIONS FROM SELECTED PROCESSES (l)
WITHOUT CONTROL DEVICES ArlD WITH TYPICAL CONTROL DEVICES
PARTICLE SIZE
PROCESS DESCRIPTION INDUSTRY CONTROL DEVICE DISTRIBUTION REFERENCES
% WEIGHT
Open Hearth Furnace Iron and Steel MRI Handbook - Table 9-3 (Electron Microscope)
Oxygen Lance Lownie, H. w. and J. Varga, "A System Analysis
(Lime 8011) Uncontrolled 45% <2 Study of the Integrated Iron and Steel
30% 2-5 Industry," Battelle, Contract No. PM-22-68-65,
17% 5-10 May 1969
8% >LO
Mccrone, W. C. et al: "The Particle Atlas"
Ann Arbor Science Publishers, 1967
Open Hearth Furnace Iron and Steel 20% <2u MRI Handbook - Table 9-3 (Electron Microscope)
Oxygen Lance 25% 2-Su Lown1e 1 H. w.: op. cit.
(composite run) Uncontrolled 24% 5-lOu McCi;one, w.c.: op. cit.
31% >lOu
PARTICLE SIZE
DISTRIBUTION REFERENCES
PROCESS DESCRIPTION INDUSTRY CONTROL DEVICE % WEIGHT
Pulverized Coal Beiler Power Plant Uncontrolled 15% <311 MRI Handbook BAHCO Analysis
10% 3-511
17% 5-1011
23% 10-2011
16% 20-4011
19% >4011
Cyclone - 6 in. d1a. 83% <Ju Same as above fer cyclone and ESP
High Efficiency 11% 3-5 u
Followed By 5% 5-1011
Electrostatic 1% 10-2011
Precipitator Neg 20-4011
Neg >4011
Oil Burners Residential/Commercial Uncontrolled Est 90% <l II Reference: MITRE Estimate Based On
Industrial and Power Plant 011 Burners
Metallurgical Coke Iron and Steel Uncontrolled 4% <47 u Reference: MRI Handbook: Private Commun1-
96% >4711 cations with Several Steel Companies
TABLE 4
PARTICLE SIZE DISTRIBUTION FOR EMISSIONS FROM SELECTED PROCESSES
WITHOUT CONTROL DEVICES AND WITH TYPICAL CONTROL DEVICES
(Con t1.nued)
PARTICLE SIZE
DISTRIBUTION REFERENCES
PROCESS DESCRIPTION INDUSTRY CONTROL DEVICE
% WEIGHT
Roasters Pr1.mary Copper Uncontrolled 15% <lOll MRI Handbook
85% >101)
PARTICLE SIZE
DISTRIBUTION REFERENCES
PROCESS DESCRIPTION INDUSTRY CONTROL DEVICE
% WEIGHT
Incineration (continued) Municipal (continued) Spray Chamber 62% <21J Stairmand: op. cit.
22% 2-101'
3% 10-201'
2% 20-301'
11% >301'
PARTICLE SIZE
DISTRIBUTION REFERENCE
PROCESS DESCRIPTION INDUSTRY CONTROL DEVICE % WEIGHT
Sintering (continued) Iron and Steel (continued) Dry Cyclone Plus ESP 13% <2 A. P. Engineering Manual: op. cit.
17% 2-10 Watkins and Darby: op. Cl.t.
27% 10-30
3% 30-50
40% >50
Primary Zinc Uncontrolled 100% <10 Vere1n Deutscher Ingenieure, VDl, p.2285
Sept. 1961 (Size Analysis: Unspecified)
Fabric Filter Plus 100% <10 Sommer lad, R. s.: op. cit.
Wet ESP Watkins and Darby: op. cit,
ESP Plus Wet ESP 100% <10 Watkins and IJarby: op. Cl.t,
Primary Lead Uncontrolled 15% <10 MRI Handbook says similar to copper
85% >10 roasting
Ore Mining and Handling Asbestos Uncontrolled 100% <40\J Davis, w. E. & Associates: National Inventory
Cyclone r1.us nagnouse i,st. J.UU;i; <J.U of Sources and Emissions Cadmium, Nickel,
and Asbestos
TABLE 4
PARTICLE SIZE DISTRIBUTION FOR EMISSIONS FROM SELECTED PROCESS
WITHOUT CONTROL DEVICES AND WITH TYPICAL CONTROL DEVICES
(Continued)
PARTICLE SIZE
DISTRIBUTION REFERENCES
PROCESS DESCRIPTION INDUSTRY CONTROL DEVICE
% WEIGHT
Natural Gas Combustion Industrial Uncontrolled 100% <511 MRI Handbook (Size Analysis: MRI Estimate)
Pellet Plants Iron Ore Uncontrolled 1% <211 TRW: Engineering and Cost Effectiveness
4% 2-1011 Study of Fluoride Emissions Control.
15% 10-3011 Jan. 1972
5% 30-50 Southern Research Institute: op. cit.
75% >50 (Size Analysis: BARCO plus SEIVE)
PARTICLE SIZE
DISTRIBUTION REFERENCE
PROCESS DESCRIPTION INDUSTRY CONTROL DEVICE % WEICHT
Bleaching Pulp and Paper Uncontrolled All Gas E.P.A.: Draft, Control Techniques for
Chlorine and Hydrogen Chloride Emissions.
Alkali Scrubber All Gas March 1971
Oil Burners Power Plants Uncontrolled 90% <lu MRI Handbook: (Size Analys1.s: Unknown)
10% >lu
Industrial Uncontrolled 90% <lu MRI Handbook: (Size Analysis: Unknown)
10% >lu
Blast Furnace Primary Iron and Steel Uncontrolled 50%* <74u MRI Handbook: (Size Technique. Unknown)
50%* ,74u
..... "' MRI reports particle size highly variable
0
Settling Chamber Efficiencies are A.P. Engineering Manual: op. cit.
highly variable
depending on cham-
ber parameters.
Limit on collec-
t1on size is
usually 40u or
greater.
rligh Efficiency 80% <74u Tur-ner, B.: Grit Emissions Bay Area APCD
Cyclone 20% >74u Library Accession 977S
PARTICLE SIZE
DISTRIBUTIOII REFERENCES
PROCESS DESCRIPTION INDUSTRY CONTROL DEVICE % WEIGHT
Blast Furnace (continued) Primary Lead Uncontrolled 100% <.3 MRI Handbook (Size Analysis: Not Specified)
Penetra-
High Efficiency 96% tion at <.J MRI Volume II - Figure 17
Cyclone
Secondary Copper Uncontrolled 100% <.5 MRI Handbook (Size Analysis: Not Specified)
Penetra-
Fabric Filter 5% tion at <.5 MRI Volume II - Figure 17
Ferroalloys Uncontrolled 80% <l MRI Handbook (Size Analysis: Not Specified)
20% 1-20
PARTICLE SIZE
PROCESS DESCRIPTION INDUSTRY CONTROL DEVICE DISTRIBUTION REFERENCES
% WEIGHT
Blast Furnace (continued) Ferroalloys (continued) Fabric Filter 99% <l)J- MRI Volume II
1% 1-20
Non-Ferrous Alloys Uncontrolled 100% < ,JJJ- A P. Engineering Manual: op. Cl.t.
Allen, C. L.' et al.: op. cit. (Size
Analysis: Electron Microscope)
...
N
Stoker Coal 801.ler Industrial or P!!wer
Plant
Uncontrolled 9%
10%
<10
10-20 MRI Handbook: op. Cl.t. (average of
17% 20-44 spreader stoker & underfed stoker)
64% > 44
Gas Burners Residential, Commercial Uncontrolled 100% <51-'- MRI Handbook: op. cit.
or Industrial
High Efficiency ESP Avg.5% Penetration MRI Volume II - Figure 17
, n 0-'i u u~nn~
Pulverized Coal Boiler Industrial Same as Power Plant Data MRI Handbook: op. Cl.t.
TABLE 4
PARTICLE SIZE DISTRIBUTION FOR EMISSIONS FROM SELECTED PROCESSES
WITHOUT CONTROL DEVICES AND WITH TYPICAL CONTROL DEVICES
(Continued
PARTICLE SIZE
PROCESS DESCRIPTION INDUSTRY CONTROL DEVICE :nsTRIBUTION REFERENCES
% WEIGHT
E.~ISSIONS OF PARTICULATES AND FINE PARTICULATES AFTER 100% APPLICATION OF BEST CONTROL DEVICE (l)
Iron
&
&
Steel
Steel
Electrostatic
Precipitator
Electrostatic
Prec1pitator
58%
55%
<5
<2
41%
Pulverized Coal Boiler Power Plant Cyclone olus ESP 83% <3 97%* 51,471 20,164 16,736 <3
Chlorine Liquefaction Chlorine & Return Vents & 0% All 11as 100% 43,000 43,000 None
Alkahs Alkali Scrubber
Roasting Primary Copper Settlin11, Water 54,: <10 100% 4,373 4,373 2,361 <10
Spray plus ESP
Primary Zinc Waste Heat Boiler 37% <5 100% 34,187 34,187 12.649 <5
plus Cyclone plus
ESP
Incineration !-lunicipal Medium Ener11y 72% <2 100%* 29,393 4,741 3,414 <2
Wet Scrubber
Domestic Peabody Scru~ber Unknown Neg. 730 730 Unknown
*Best Control Device Not Universally Used. ** Applying High Efficiency ESP as Best Device.
(1) Source: The MITRE Corporation
Preliminary Results
EPA Contract No. 68-01-0438
TABLE 5
EIIISSIONS OF PARTICULATES AND FINE PARTICULATES AFTE~ 100% APPLICATION OF BEST CONTROL DEVICE
(Continued)
BEST DEVICE % BY WEIGHT % PRESENT EMISSIONS WITH FINE PARTICULATE
PROCESS INDUSTRY IN USE FINE PARTICULATF APPLICATION EMISSIONS 100% USE OF BtST EIIIISSIONS WITH 100%
FOR BEST DEVICE OF CONTROL TONS CONTROL AVAILABLE BEST CONTROL - TONS
TON<;
Sintenng Iron & Steel Baghouse 43% <2 100%* 18,200 2,984 1,283 <2
Primary Zinc Baithouse Plus 100% <10 100%* 14,400 2,880 2,880 <10
Wet ESP
Primary Lead Cyclone Plus 100% <10 90%* 1,016 230 230 <10
Ba2house
Ore "lining & Asbestos Cyclone Plus 100% <40 EST 100% 5,618 5,618 Unknown
Handling Baghouse
Mica (Beryllium) Cyclone Plus Unknown EST 100% 1.4 Lbs. 1.4 Lbs. Unknown
Baghouse
Borax Baghouse Unknown 100% 100 100 Unknown
Manganese Baghouse Unknown 100% 5 s Unknown
Copper, Zinc, Lead
..., Barium, Nickel, Baghouse Unknown EST 35% 20,605 3,008 Unknown
Mercury, Vanadium
"'
Asphalt Blowing Roofing Material Scrubber & 92% <5 EST 99% 23,230 23,218 21,360 <5
Afterburner
Natural Gas Combustion Industrial None 1100% <5 0 20,220 20,220 20,220 <S
Pellet Plants Iron Ore Baghouse 43% <2 EST 83%* 18,200 719 309 <2
Bleaching Pulp & Paper Alkali Scrubber 0% All gas 100% 18,000 18,000 None
Oil Burners Power Plants None (Except Soot 90% <l 0 14,273 199 ** 128 **
Blow)
Oil Burners Industrial None (Except Soot 90% <l 0 14,053 196 ** 126 **
Blow)
Blast Furnace Iron & Steel Cyclone Plus ESP SO% <74 100% 7,215 7,215 Unknown
EMISSIONS OF PARTICULATES AND FINE PARTICULATES AFTER 100% APPLICATION OF BEST CONTROL DEVICE
(Continued)
BEST DEVICE % BY WEIGHT % PRESENT EMISSIONS WITH FINE PARTICULATE
PROCESS INDUSTRY IN USE FINE PARTICULATE APPLICATION E'IISSIONS 100% USE OF BEST E~ISSlONS WITH 100%
FOR BEST DEVICE OF CONTROL TONS CONTROL AVAILABLE BEST CONTROL - TONS
TONS
Blast Furnace Pn.mary Lead Cyclone Plus 100% <.3 98%* 277 198 198
(cont'd)
Secondary Lead
Baghouse
High Eff ESP 100% <.4 I 100%* 1,500 98 98
Secondary Copper
Plus Baghouse
Baghouse 100% <,5
.I 75% 126 22 22
Ferroalloys High Eff ESP 80% <I 100%* 4,104 Unknown Unknown
Non-Ferroalloys H1.gh Eff ESP or 100% <,3 50% 130 6 6
Baghouse
Stoker Coal 801.ler Industrial H1.gh Eff. ESP 2% 10 62% * 13,237 1213 24 < 10.
Gas Burners Power Plane None 100% 5 0% 6,151 308 ** 308 < 5 .
Stoker Coal Boiler Power Plant H1.gh Eff. ESP 2% !Of' 87% * 5,994 1119 22 < 10..,_
Pulven.zed Coal
Burner
Induscr1.al High Eff. I:SP 83% 3 f-L 95% * 3,783 1282 1064 < 3
"yclone Coal Boiler Industrial H1.gh EH. ESP 83% 5 . 91% * 1,891 501 416 < 5 .
yclone Coal Bo1.ler Power Plant H1.gh EH. ESP 83% 5 71% * 1,776 218 181 < 5 I'-
Particulates
Configuration
77
TABLE 6
Economics
Product cost
Costs of existing control technology
Contribution of source to be controlled to final product cost
Impact of source on local economy
Waste disposal problems
78
TABLE 7
High-
High- Voltage
Efficiency Wet Fabric Electrostatic
Operation Cyclones Cyclones Collectors Filter Precipitators
Ceramics
Raw product handling Rare Seldom Frequent Frequent No
Fettling Rare Occasional Frequent Frequent No
Refractory sizing Seldom Occasional Frequent Frequent No
Glaze and vitreous enamel spray No No Usual Occasional No
Chemicals
Material handling Occasional Frequent Frequent Frequent Rare
Crushing, grinding Often Frequent Frequent Frequent No
Pneumatic conveying Usual Occasional Rare Usual No
Roasters, kilns, coolers Occasional Usual Usual Rare Often
Coal Mining and Power Plant
Material handling Rare Occasional Frequent Frequent No
Bunker ventilation Occasional Frequent Occasional Frequent No
Dedusting, air cleaning Frequent Frequent Occasional Often No
Drying Rare Occasional Frequent No No
Fly Ash
Coal-burning:
Chain grate No Rare No No No
Stoker fired Rare Usual No No Rare
Pulverized fuel Rare Frequent No No Frequent
Wood-burning Occasional Occasional No No No
Foundry
Shake out Rare Rare Usual Rare No
Sand handling Rare Rare Usual Rare No
Tumbling mills Nu ~o Frequent Frequent No
Abrasive cleaning No Occasional Frequent Frequent No
TABLE 7
Metal Melting
Steel blast furnace Frequent Rare Frequent No Frequent
Steel open hearth No No Doubtful Possible Probable
Steel electric furnace No No Considerable Frequent Rare
00
0 Ferrous cupola Rare Rare Frequent Occasional Occasional
Nonferrous reverberatory No No Rare
Nonferrous crucible No No Rare Occasional
Metal Working
Production grinding, scratch
brushing, abrasive cutoff Frequent Frequent Consid~rable Considerable No
Portable and swing frame Frequent Rare Frequent Rare No
Buffing Frequent Rare Frequent Rare No
Toolroom Frequent Frequent Frequent Frequent No
Cast iron machining Rare Frequent Considerable Considerable No
TABLE 7
Plastics
Raw material processing (See comments under chemicals)
Plastic finishing Frequent Frequent Frequent Frequent No
Rubber Products
....
00
Mixers No No Frequent Usual No
Batchout rolls No No Usual Frequent No
Talc dusting and dedusting No No Frequent Usual No
Grinding Often Often Frequent Often No
TABLE 8-A
Venturi
Venturi Throat Pulverized Coal. Abrasives, Rotary Kilns, 0.5
.> 6-80 99+
....00 Flooded Disk Foundries, Flue Gas, Fertilizers. Lime >0.5 6-70 99+
Multiple Jet Kilns, Roasting, Titanium Dioxide Pro-
cessing, Odor Control, Oxygen Steel Making,
Coke oven Gas, Fly Ash
Venturi Jet Fertilizer Manufacture, Odor Control, Smoke
Control
Packed Bed
Fixed Fertilizer Manufacturing, Plating, Acid
Pickling > 10.0 1-6 85
Flooded Acid Vapors, Aluminum Inoculation, Foundries,
Asphalt Plants, Atomic Wastes, Carbon Black, > 2.5 2-8 95
Ceramic Frit, Chlorine Tail Gas, Pigment
Manufacture, Cupola Gas, Driers, Ferrite.
Fertilizer
Type of Air
Cleaning Collector Efficiency,
Operation or Process Air Contaminant Equipment Wt.%
Type of Air
Cleaning Collector Efficiency,
Operation or Process Air Contaminant Equipment Wt. %
..,,
00
TABLE 9
Wet Scrubber
a. Cyclonic Spray Boiler flue gas Fly ash (pulverized coal) >2.5 0.49-2.58 0.02-0.046 88-98.8
Scrubber
(Pease-Anthony Blast furnace (iron) Iron ore coke 0.5-20 3-24 0.03-0.08 99
Type)
Lime kiln (Kraft mud) Lime 1-25 7.7 0.25 97
Lime kiln (raw stone) Lime 2-40 9.2 0.08 99
Reverbatory lead furnace Lead compounds 0.5-2 0.023-0.04 95-98
Rotary dryer Ammonium nitrate large, unstable 99+
agglomerates
Superphosphate den and mixer Fluorine compounds Mist 0.14 0.003 97.8
b. Venturi Scrubber Iron and Steel Industry
Gray iron cupola Iron, coke, silica dust 0.1-10 1-2 0.05-0.15 95
Oxygen steel converter Iron oxide 0.5-2 8-10 0.05-0.08 98.5
Steel open hearth furnace (scrap) Iron and zinc oxide 0.08-1.00 O.S-1.S 0.03-0.06 95
Steel open hearth furnace Iron oxide 0.02-0.50 1.0-6.0 0.01-0.07 99
(oxygen lanced)
Blast furnace (iron Iron ore and coke dust 0.5-20 3-24 0.008-0.05 99
Electric furnace Ferro-manganese fume 0.1-1 10-12 0.04-0.08 99
Electric furnace Ferro silicon dust 0.1-1 1-S 0.1-0.3 92
Rotary kiln-iron reduction Iron, carbon 0.5-50 3-10 0.1-0.3 99
Crushing and Screening Taconite iron ore dust 0.5-100 5-25 0.005-0.01 99.9
Chemical Industry
Acid-humidified so Sulphuric acid mist
3
(a) Scrub with water 0.13 0.0007 99.4
(b) Scrub with 40% acid 0.176 0.0012 99.3
Acid concentrator Sulphuric acid mist 0.058 0.0014 97.5
Copperas roasting kiln Sulphuric acid mist 0.087 0.0009 99
Chlorosulfonic acid plant Sulphuric acid mist 0.325 0.0034 98.9
Phosphoric acid plant Orthophosphoric acid mist 0.084 0.0016 98
Titanium chloride plant, Titanium dioxide, hydrogen
titanium dioxide dryer chloride fumes 0.5-1 1-5 0.05-0.1 95
TABLE 9
Petroleum Industry
Catalytic reformer Catalyst dust 0.5-50 0.09 0.005 95
Acid concentrator Sulphuric acid mist 0.059 0.0014 97.5
TCC catalyst regenerator Oil fumes 0.330 0.0035 98
Fertilizer Industry
Fertilizer dryer Ammonium chloride fumes 0.05-1 0.1-0.5 0.05 85
Superphosphate den and mixer Fluorine compounds 0.134 0.0024 98
Pulp Mills
Lime kiln Lime dust, soda fume 0.1-50 2-10 0.01-0.15 99
Recovery furnace Salt cake 4-6 0.4-0.6 90
TABLE 9
Total 18.8
TABLE 10
Total 421.6
Total 20.2
ODOR EMISSIONS FROM TYPICAL INDUSTRIAL EQUIPMENT AND ODOR CONTROL DEVICES
Rendering cooker
(Edible charge)
h 70,000h
Dry batch type 2,500h
Wet Batch type 350
Continuous type 650 to 1 ,oooh,l
ODOR EMISSIONS FROM TYPICAL INDUSTRIAL EQUIPMENT AND ODOR CONTROL DEVICES
(Continued)
ODOR EMISSIONS FROM TYPICAL INDUSTRIAL EQUIPMENT AND ODOR CONTROL DEVICES
(Continued)
ODOR EMISSIONS FROM TYPICAL INDUSTRIAL EQUIPMENT AND ODOR CONTROL DEVICES
(Continued)
Neutralisation or counteraction
with chemicals 57%
96
TABLE 13**
Odor
Removal
Concentra- BmiHion Condensate Afterburner Concentration Modal Emission Effi-
tion (odor Rate (odor Condenser Temperature Temperature (Odor units/ Rate (odor ciency
units/scf) units/min) Type (OF) (OF)
sfc) units/min) %
*Based on a hypothetical cooker that emits 500 scfm of vapor containing 5 percent
noncondensible paea.
OPSERVED VALUES
. . . .M 0
- ,.... .'
ELEMENT roxlCITY
IIAXIIIU~l, l I MIN1J 4
n.v WllRlllAY TIME SCIIIOEDER16 CHRISTENSEN(6) EU:INS(6l
FACTOR (I) 100. WEIGHTED AVG, J Nov 71 9 Nov 72 ZZ Nov 7Z
ARSENIC
Ao 1 5 15 10 10
ASBESTOS
05 fiber/
111
I fiber,'
ml
,I Uber/
ml
BARIUM
1w N I >U I IIU 5 zoo 10 z,
IU:.RlLLIUPI 1 UII~/ UUOl'I UUOl/ U0U01 02 0 l DUI
~Ro 100 50
oxide
"-.WHIU'I r JI I OJ Ol I 000\ 1
fume CL
0 I 5.
Cd J. soluble aalu
6, dust
CHLORINE N JO JO JO
rl
oluble
CHROMIUM E 10 I !10 006 / oooz 5 Hlta I 10 10
Cr meulllc &
10
lnaoluble ealu
FLUORIDES E I 89 / 16 05 / 05 Z5 10 100 50
F
KANCANESE E I 44 / 08 01 I 006 50 CL I, zo z,
Mn
MERCURY T 5 I I z
NICKEL r z , 76 006 I DOZ 10 OJ 10 10
NI
POH
SELENIUM N z 1 10 10
Se
TUI T 10 ,.01 zo OJ zo zo
Sn
(I Iii Nan-<aal, 6
T Toxlc ( >111nr:, A Schroeder I H D., Profe11or
l EHentlal of Ph:,1lolo1:,, Emarltua Dartaauth
Medical School
(?)Schroeder. H 1 "A Senatble THk of Air Pollution by Heull" Kerben E Chrlatenaen, D Sc
Kead, Toxicity and RHearch Analy1h
(])Ah Quality Data for 1967 (Rev '7l) EPA, p S Branch, NIOSH
Ka rvey I !lklne, N D , Dlvhlon
('-)By E11halon Specr:oanph Mer.had for 'tetah Aahed wlth Lav of Dccupatlanal Hy1lene, Departmant
Temperature Oxygen PlHma Aaher of Labor and lnduatriH, Co1110nv1allh
of Pla1Hchu11:etu
( j) 24 Hr avena H:cept H noted
98
APPENDIX A
99
HAZARDOUS POLLUTANT SOURCES ll)
ARSENIC
Amount % This
Source in Tons Pollutant
ASBESTOS
Amount % This
Source in Tons Pollutant
101
HAZAROOUS POLLUTANT SOURCES(l)
BARIUM
Amount % This
Source in Tons Pollutant
102
HAZARDOUS PPLLUTANT SOURCES (l)
BERYLLIUM
Amount % This
Source in Tons Pollutant
103
HAZARDOUS POLLUTANT SOURCES (l)
BOROl{
Arnounc % This
Source in Tons Pollutant
104
HAZARDOUS POLLUT.&~T SOURCES (1)
CADMIUM
Amount % This
Source in Tons Pollutant
CHLORINE
Amount % This
Source in Tons Pollutant
Chlorine Fluxing
Non-Ferrous Metals 100 0.13
Iron and Steel 1,900 2.43
Bleaching, Pulp and Paper 18,000 23.02
Chlorine Industry
Manufacture 4,000 5.12
Liquefaction and Handling 43,000 54.99
Organic Chlorine Chemicals 8,500 10.87
Hydrochloric Acid Manufacture 800 1.02
Bleach Manufacture 900 1.15
Miscellaneous Chlorine
Products 1,000 1.28
TOTAL 78,200 100.01
106
:>OURCES (1)
CHRO~IUM
Amount % This
Source in Tons Pollutant
107
HAZARDOUS POLLUTANT SOURCES (1)
COPPER
Amount % This
in Tons Pollutant
Source
Total 13,463
FLUORIDES
Amount % This
Source in Tons Pollutant
FLUORIDES (Continued)
Amount % This
Source in Tons Pollutant
110
HAZARDOUS POLLUT,~~T SOURCES (l)
LEAD
Amount % This
Source in Tons Pollutant
111
HAZARDOUS POLLUTANT SOURCES
LEAD (Continued)
Amount % This
Source in Tons Pollutant
112
HAZARDOUS POLLUTANT SOURCES(!)
MANGANESE
Amount % This
Source in Tons Pollutant
113
HAZARDOUS POLLUTANT SOURCES(!)
MERCURY
Amount % This
Source in Tons Pollutant
TOTAL 792
114
HAZARDOUS POLLUTANT SOURCES (l)
NICKEL
Amount % This
Source in Tons Pollutant
115
HAZARDOUS POLLUTANT SOURCES(!)
POM
Amount % This
Source in Tons Pollutant
116
HAZARDOUS POLLUTANT SOURCES (l)
SELENIUM
Amount % This
Source in Tons Pollutant
Primary Copper
Roasting 17 1.99
Rcverberatory Furnace 8 0.94
Converters 22 2.57
Material Handling 5 0.59
Primary Zinc
Roasting 27 3.16
Primary Lead
Sintering 5 0.59
Blast Furnace 2 0.23
Secondary Copper, Zinc 1 Lead 1 0.12
Glass Manufacture 203 23.74
Paint, Varnish, Lacquer Manufacture 1 0.12
Incineration 1 0.12
Power Plant Boilers
Pulverized Coal 360 42.ll
Stoker Coal 41 4.80
Cyclone Coal 12 1.40
All Oil 19 2.22
Tndustrial Boilers
Pulverized Coal 16 1.87
Stoker Coal 56 6.55
Cyclone Coal 8 0.94
All Oil 14 1.64
Residential/Commercial Boilers
Coal 5 0.59
Oil 32 3,74
TOTAL 855 100.03
117
HAZARDOUS POLLUTANT SOURCES (l)
TIN
Amount % This
Source in Tons Pollutant
118
HAZARDOUS POLLUTANT SOURCES (l)
VANADIUM
Amount % This
Source in Tons Pollutant
119
HAZARDOUS POLLUTANT SOURCES
ZINC (Continued)
AJnount % This
Source in Tons Pollutant
Industrial Boilers
Pulverized Coal 109 0.07
Stoker Coal 382 0.25
Cyclone Coal 55 0.04
All Oil 99 0.07
Residential/Commercial Boilers
Coal 34 0.02
Oil 221 0.15
120
HAZARDOUS POLLUTANT SOURCES (l)
ZINC
Amount % This
Source in Tons Pollutant
121
APPENDIX B
Act.
hazardous air pollutant as one "to which no ambient air quality stan-
hazardous, the law states that he shall "establish any such standard
122
summary documents are available.
Those that have been published to date include the following sub-
stances:
Beryllium Lead
Mercury Fluorides
Asbestos Cadm:J,um
as follows:
Nickel
Vanadium First draft of NAS
Manganese Report in preparation
Chromium
Zinc
Current Year Studies
Chlorine
Available in about 15 Months
Copper
associated with each. For mercury and beryllium specific ambient air
123
Although no quantitative air quality standards could be set for
Lead
Extent of Pollution
2
The NAS Report on lead concludes that there has been substantial
water. The larger portion of this has been contributed by the lead-using
while the remainder is frnm burned lead alkyls. Moreover, it has been
were higher than concentrations in rural areas, with the larger cities
Total 184,316
124
Generally, lead concentrations decrease rapidly with distance
remain in the atmosphere for long periods of time and can become
effect that the urban air concentrations of lead has been increasing
whose vicinity very high levels of lead have been found both in the
3
air and in the soi1 .
cluded that for the bulk of the population lead in the air posed no
125
pollution, occupational exposures in the lead-using industries excepted.
stantial source."
trial sources would add to the already high rates of intake and thereby
dards for and controls over lead emissions is a likely one so that
sources of lead emissions merit would rank high among the candidates
Fluorides
Evaluation of Hazard
conclusion 9
126
10
Also, the indication is given that airborne fluoride concen-
Cadmium
disease found among Japanese. The main cause of this disease is con-
cause cadmium will accumulate in the body. For example, the "standard
127
Absorption occurs primarily directly from the lungs which retain
128
APPENDIX B
REFERENCES
51'b"d
1 , Chapter 5
6 b'd
l. l. p. 209
7l.'b"d
1 pp.104-144
10 l.b"d
l. 221
P
11 'b"d pp. 34-41
1 1
12
1ou Friberg, et al., Cadmium in the Environment. A Toxicological
and Epidemiological Approval. Karolenska Institute, Stockholm,
Sweden, April 1971
13 ibid. Chapter 6
14
ibid. Chapter 7
15 ibid. Chapter 8
16
ibid. Chapter 6
17.b"d
l. l. p. 3-3
129
APPENDIX C
~f each through the economy from mining through end use and waste
was assembled during the course of the work and is included here as
a useful reference.
130
CXIPPER
SMELTERS
1
(2700 l'ONS)
I CLASS! (638 l'ONS)
MANUFACTURE
MININCl zrnc1
SMELTERS
I PESTICIDE 1
MANUFACTURE
PESTICIDE
APPLICATION
COTTON GINNING
& BURNlNI'
1
(2 l'ONS)
(1390 TONS)
I (196 TONS (292S TONS)l (34S TONS)
I
WOOD
WOOD PRESERVATIVE 1
SMELTERS PRESERVATIVE)
MANUFACTURE (NEC)
(376 TONS) APPLICATION (NEC)
I NONFERROUS ALLOY
OPERATIONS (NEC)
1
IMPORTED)
I MANUFACTIIRE
1
USE OF
1
1-----------+--I
INCINERATION OF
I
ARSENIC OF PHOSPHORIC DETERGENTS SEWAGE & SLUDGE
(NONE) ACID (UNKNOWN) (NEC) (2 TONS) l
I I RON FOIINDRI ES l
(97 TONS)
I HANDLING DURING 1
OTIIER MANUFACTURING 1 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ~
1 I
"NATIONAL INVENl'ORY OF SOURCES AND EMISSIONS
PROCESSES (3.3 TONS)
2 TONS 4466 TONS 934 TONS 3668 TONS 347 TONS 9417
I
II I
MINING 6 Ml~LING
(5610 TONS)
I ... PAPERl (15 TONS)
MANUFACTURE
I
I I I
I- -
BRAKE LINING 1
MANUFACTURE
EMISSIONS ARE
FROM MOBILE SOURCES .,_
I
I (318 TONS) NOT INCLUDED
I
I
_
MANUFACTURE OF
ASBESTOS CEMENT
I CONSTRUCTION
OF BUILDINGS
I INCi NERATION &
DESTRUCTION BY
I - I-
MANUFACTURE OF
- I
......... I
IMPORTED OTHER ASBESTOS]
ASBESTOS 3 BLD MATERIALS
(NONE)
I I
(UNKNOWN)
I I ... MANUFACTURE OF
STEEL FIREPROOFING
(UNKNOWN) 3
I
I
APPLICATION OF
STEEL FIREPROOFING
(15 TONS) 1
- I
I I ... 'IANUFACTIIRE AND
APPLICATION OF
INSIILATING CEMENT
I WEARING AWAY
OF INSIILATING
CEl!ENT (25 TONS)l
- I TOTAL
EMISSIONS
(UNKNOWN)
(TONS)
I I -- WELL DRILLING
1
-- 3
SYSTEMS, INC , Ocr0BER 1969.
I
I
I
HITRE
I
HUD ( 70 TON~)
I I
HINING
1 HILLlNGl
- I- 1
PAINT (JO TONS) ....
I I
(30 TONS) (2700 TONS) MANUFACTURE
I
----I - I I
1
METALLIC BARIUH
PRODUCTION (NEG) -- I
I I
IHPORTED
3
- -
BARIUM CHEMICALS
PRODUCTION (4400
-- I I I
I
BARIUM
(NONE) 1
TONS)
.... I I- I
I-
RUBBER PRODUCTS! INCINERATION)
......... PRODUCTION (NEG)
I
(UNIQIOWN)
I I
I .... I RON FOUNDRIES
(50 TONS)
1
I
-- I
I I
I- -I - I
-I
STEEL PRODUCTION COAL ( 4000 TONS) l
(200 TONS)l COMBUSTION
I I 1
OIL (100 TONS)
COMBUSTION -I I TOTAL
l!MISSTONS
I I (TONS)
I I
IMPORTED
BERYL ORE
(NONE)l
- I- IRON FOUNDRIES
(4 TONS) 1 - I
I I
...... I I- INCINERATION
(NEG) 1
.,. a
I -
I OIL (8 TONS)
COl!IIUSTION
1
.... I TOTAL
EIIISSIONS
(TONS)
ITRE,
I I
I
I
---I IRON FOUNDRIES
(UNKNOWN) 2
I
- I-
I
I
l'IPORTED
BORON
(NONE)l
I
MANUFACTURE OF
FERTILIZER &
PESTICIDE
(UNKNOWN))
I
FERTILIZER AND
PESTICIDE
APPLICATION!
(1800 TONS) -I -
I-
MANUFACTURE OF USE OF
-I
I I I OIL 3 (40 TONS)
CO'IBUSTION -I TOTAL
~IISSIONS
(TONS)
100 TONS 2400 TONS 1483 TONS 6540 TONS 20 TONS 10,543
1"NATIONAL INVENTORY OF SOURCES AND El!ISSIONS - SORON," W, E DAVIS
AND ASSOCBTES, JUNE 1972.
2"PRELIHINARY AlR POLLUTION SURVEY OF BORON AND ITS COMPOUNDS, LITTON
SYSTEMS, INC, OCTOBER 1969,
~ITRI!
PIGMENT
ZINC MINING
MANUFACTUP
(NEG)l (ll TONS)
IMPORTED
ELECTROPLATING
CADMIUM (NEG)l
(hONE)l
1
"NATIONAL INVENTORY OF SOURCES AND E!IISSIONS - CADMIUM, W E, DAVIS AND
ASSOCIATES," FEBRUARY 1970
2
"PRELIMINARY AIR POLLUTION SURVEY OF CADMIIN AND ITS COMPOUNDS," LI'!TON
SYSTEMS, INC., OCTOBER 1969
3
MITRE
-I
I I
CHLORINATIONS
(8500 TONS) 1
I I
I- I PULP
I I I
- ... -
HYDROCHLORIC
I
ACID MANUFACTURE
(800 TONS) 1
I
BLEACHING
(18,000 TONS)l
I I I
CHLORIDE I ELECTROLYTIC
HANUF ACTIJRE OF
I CHLORINE
I I I
I
COMPOUNDS FWXING
I
CHLORINE
(NONE) 2 (2000 TONS) 1
I (4000 TONS)l
I I
I I- BLEACH
!IANUFACTIJRING
I I I
I I
(900 TONS) 1
I I I
I I-
OTHER CHLORINE
PRODUCT
MANUFACTURI!G -I I I
I I
(1000 TONS)
I I I
- II I
CHLORINE
I I- LIOUEFACTION &
HANDLING
(43,000 TONS) 1
I TOTAL
E''USSIONS
I I I I (TONS)
1
"CONTROL TECIINIOUES FOR CHLORINE & HYDROGEN CHLORINE F:ISSIONS," EPA
2
"PRELIMINARY AIR POLLUTION SURVEY OF CHLORINE GAS," LITTON SYSTEMS,
INC., OCTOBER 1969
3
'!ITRE
I APPLICATIOJS OF
,.. I
I I- I
PRl'IER PAINTS &
IMPORTED
CHROMIJE ORE
(NONE)
I
I
METALLURGICAL
PROCESSING
(4200 TONS) 1
I
'IANUFACTIJRE OF
CHRO'IATES &
OTIIER Cllt:l'II CALS
(UNKNOWN)2 -I - DIPS (UNKNOIIN) 2
APPLICATION AS
FUNGICIDES & WOOD
PRESERVATIVES
,..
-I I
I
I I (IJNKNOWN) 2
I- I
ASBESTOS CHROME
MINING
(8 TONS)3
PLATING
(UNKNDYN) 2
I
I I I I I
I I I I- UICINERATION
(l'NKNOIIN) J
I
,.,...
I I I I
a,
I I COAL (7715 TONS)
- I
I I I
COMBUSTION)
I
- I
I I I OIL (77 TONS)
COHBUSTIO!IJ - I I TOTAL
EMISSIONS
I I I I I
(TONS)
'.\tlTRE
I I
----- .... I
CONSTRUCTION OF
I
BUILDINGS
(SEE 'IISC) 1
I I
.... -
USED IN INDUSTRIAL
I
- I I
SECONDARY
I
'IACIIINERY PARTS
COPPER (210 TONS) 1
& ELECTRICAL F.OUIP
PRODUCTION (SEE MISC)l
I -
USED FOR SEED
TREATMENT &
FUNGICIDE -I I I
(SEE HISC)
1
I I I
... I IHPORTED
COPPER
-- - ELECTROPLAJING
-
I -
lNCINERATION OF
SEWAGE, SLUDGE, &
I
I
(SEE MISC)
"' (NONE)2 REFUSF. (460 TONS)
I . - I
I
CLASS
-
I
COAL (1030 TONS) l
'IA!IUFACTURE
COMBUSTION
I -
(SEE MISC)l
I
I
... IRON & STEEL
PRODUCTION
(2760 TONS)
-I OIL (SO TONS) l
COl-lBUSTION -I I
I -
IRO'I
FOU'IDRIES
(SO TONS)
- I I I TOTAL
E.'IISSIONS
(TONS)
I I I I I
190 TI>NS I 8910 TONS I 3042 TONS T 1080 TONS I 460 TONS I 13,682
l"NATIONAL INVENTORY OF SOURCES AND E'IISSlONS - COPPER," WE, DAVIS, ADl!IL 1972.
2MITRE
I
I I
FLUORSPAR
MINING
( UNKNOWN ) l --I ,..
IIYDROFLUROIC2
ACID PRODUCTION
& ALKYLATION
(6500 TONS)
- I-
~I
PRIMARY ALUMINUM
PRODUCTION
(16,230 1'0NS) 2
-
I I
I
- HILLING &
. STRUCTURAL
-
I
I FLOTATION
(UNKNOWN) l
-II
CLAY PRODUCTION
(9720 TONS) 2
I I I
-I -I I I
Cu, Pb, Zn
IMPORTED EXPANDED CLAY
I
SMELTING &
FLUORSrAR REFINING - AGGREGATE PRODUCTION -
(NONE) (5300 TONS)2
(1000 TONS) 2
I I I I
,..
PHOSPHATE
ROCK MINING
(UNKNOWN) 1
PROCESSING OF
PHOSPHATE ROCK
(21,300 TONS)2 - I- OPAL GLASS
PRODUCTION
(3320 TONS) 2
-
I
- INCINERATION
(UNKNOWN)l
,,.
0
I I I I
I-
ENAHEL FRIT
-
I PRODUCTlON
(700 TONS)2 I I I
I I- CEMENT
IIAIIUFACTURE
(270 TONS)2
-I COAL (34,200 TONS)
COMBUST10N 2 - II I TOTAL
EMISSIONS
I I I I
(TONS)
I
I RON FOUNDRl ES
(l400 TONS) 1
I I
I
I
ORE CRUSHING SECONDARY LEAD BRONZE & BRASS
& GRINDING
(345 TONS)l
SMELTING
(2000 l'ONS) 1
I FOUNDRIES
(520 TONS)l
- I
I """ IMPORTED
LEAD I- I PETROLEUM
REFINING
I EMISSIONS ARE
FROH MOBILE
SOURCES ~OT -I I
(NONE)l (1250 TONS) 2
I I I
INCLUDED
I I
I-
LEAD OXIDE HANUFAClURE OF !'IUIIICIPAL
HANIJPACTURE STORAGE BATTERIES INCINERATION
(20 TONS) 1 (UNKIIOWN) 1
I (320 TONS)!
I I I
-I
EMISSIONS ARE
...... PRIMARY ZINC LEAD ALKYL
FRON MOBILE
I I
~ SMELTING HANUFAClURE
SOURCE NOT
(250 TONS) 1
I
(810 TONS)!
I INCWDED 3
I
I
PRIMARY COPPER
SMELTING
(380 TONS)l
I I
COAL ( 850 TONS) I
COMBUSTION -
I I
I I I OIL (24 TONS)!
COl!IIUSTION -I I TOTAL
EMISSIONS
I
I
I I I I (TONS)
345 TONS 3330 TONS I 4130 TONS 874 TONS I 320 TONS I 8999
~ITRE
...
CIDAL (1950 TONS) 1
COMBUSTION
-I I
OIL (7 l'ONS)l
CIDHBUSTION
...I I TOTAL
EMISSIONS
I I I I I (TONS)
5 roNs I 9271 l'ONS I 7S84 TONS I 1957 l'ONS I I7S TONS I 18,992
HANDLING OF DENTAL
PREPARATIONS
(1 TON)l
'IANUFACTURE OF
CHLORINE
(70 TONS) 1
USE OF (3 TONS)l
PHAR.'IACEUTICALS
1
"NATIONAL INVENTORY OF SOURCES AND EMISSIONS - MERCURY," W, E DAVIS AND
2
ASSOCIATES, SEPTEMBER 1971
I I
"PRELIMINARY AIR POLLUTION SURVEY OF MERCURY AND ITS CO'P'OUNDS , " LITTON
COAL (255 TONS)
C0'1BUSTION l
3
I OIL (5 TONS)l TOTAL
!!1TRE COMBUSTION E'llSSIONS
(TONS)
I -I
STAINLESS & HEST 1
I
2
"PRELIMINARY AIR POLLUTION SU'!.VEY OF NICKEL AND ITS CO'IDOUNDS." LITTON
SYSTEMS, INC., OCTOBER 1969
MINING
(SEE PRIM.
PRIMARY tlICKEL
SMELTING .... -
ALLOY STEEL
PRODUCTION
-
I
l'IITRE.
I
SMELTING) 1 I (248 TONS*) l (147 TONS) l
I I
I - ELECTROPLATING
(NEC)l - I I
I I
SECONDARY!
NICKEL SMELTING
(SEE PRIM. S'IELTING)
MANUFACTURE OF
NICKEL-CAD'IIUH
BATTERIES (2 TONS)l
- I I I
I - I I
IRON FOUNDRIES
(79 TONS)l
I-
I
I I I
I!IPORTED
- - 'IANUFACTIJRE OF
- INCINERATION
I
I
NICKEL OTHER STEEL I-
I
(UNKNOWN) 3
(NONE)) (100 TONS) 1
I I
I - l!AIIUFACfURE OF
OTHER ALLOYS
-
I
(64 TONS)l
I I
I .... 'IANUFACTURE OF
CATALYSTS
(NEG) 1
-I COAL (100 TONS)l
COMBUSTION
-I I
-
I I OIL (4970) 1
COMBUSTION -I I TOTAL
E.'IISSIONS
I I I
(TONS)
PETROLEUM OIL
REFININGl COMBUSTIONl
MANUFACTURE
OF RUBBER
PRODUCTS 1
CHEMICAL
PRODUCTION! INCINERATION
SEWAGE &
FOOD
SLUDGE
PROCESSINcl
BURNING 1
......
u,
COKE
MANUFACTURE
COAL & COKE
COMBUSTIONl
MANUFACTURE
OF COAL
PRODUCTSl
METAL MANUFACTURE
S!IELTING & OF METAL
REFININGl PRODUCTSl
GAS
1
COMBUSTION
IIOOD
COMBUSTIONl
MATERIAL Fl1lW THROUGH THE ECONOMY SHOlUNG DRI'1ARY EHISS ION SOUPCES
- POM -
I I- GLASS (203 TONS)l
MANUFACTURING
.... I
I ...
I MANU"FACTURE OF I
COPPER
HINING 1
SMELTING AND
- ELECTRONIC ....
I
REFINING l EQUIPMENT
(NEG) (85 TONS) (NEG) l
I
I .... MANUFACTURE OF
DUPLICATING
MACHINES (NEG) 1
....
I
SECONDARY
PRODUCTION
(1 TON)l
I MANUFACTURE OF
PIGMENTS (1 TON) 1
....
I
I IRON & STEEL
I-
- - INCINERATION
I
PRODUCTION OF REFUSE
(1 TON)l (NEG) 1
I
IMPORTED
-I COAL (630 TONS)
1
-
-I
SELENir COMBUSTION
(NONE)
1
"NAT10NAL [NVENTORY OF S URCES AND EMISSIONS - SELEN[UM," W. E DAVIS
AND ASSOCIATES, APRIL 1972.
2"PRELIMINARY AIR POLWTION SURVEY OF SELENill!! AND ITS CX>MPOUNDS,"
LITTON SYSTEMS, INC., OCTOBER 1969.
3
MtTRE.
I
I
IHPORTED
TIN
(NONE) 2
.... .... IRON FOUNDRIES
(UNKNOWN) 1 I-
COALl (116 TONS)
OOMBUSTION
I-
I
....,.
-I
.... IRON & STEEL
....
I
I
OIL (1 TON)l
PRODUCTION l '-- TOTAL
(260 TONS)
COMBUSTION
EMISSIONS
(TONS)
1-iITRE
I I I
HININC. AND
HILLING
(81 TONS) 1
.... I I
- IRON royNDRIES
(l TON)
-I
I FERROVANADIUH MANUFACTURE
I
- .... - ....
I
PRODUCTION!
(144 TONS)
I
1--
OF CATALYTSTS
(2 TONS)l
I I
I I
I
IMPORTED IMPORTED GLASS & CERAMICS
VANADIUH ORE
(NOllE)l
.... VANADIUM
(NONE)l
- - MANUFACTURE
(NEG)l
I-
I I-
I-
VANADIUM OIEl!ICALS
HANUFACTIIRE
(UNKNOWN) 2
.... INCINERATION
(UNKNOllN) 3
I
I I- NONFERROUS ALLOYS
MANUFACTURE
(3 TONS) l
- COAL (17!;0 TONS)
COHBUSTIONl -
I
I OIL (17,000 TONS)l
CO'UIUSTION -
1--
I TOTAL
E'IISSIOllS
I (TONS)
81 TONS 144 TONS 242 TONS 18, 7~0 TONS UNKNOWN 19,217
ZINC SHERAIU>I:tNC 6
ELECTROLYTIC
~~~~:,:;c TONS) I DISPOSITION (NEC)I
~~~~c~~;,1
6 BRONZE (HELTINC 6
FINISHINC) (IBO TONS)I
INCi NERATION OF
....
IRON 6 STEEL
COAL (4310 TOSl I
PIODUCTIO
(48,370 TONS)!
OOHBUSTION
~~:':~~o ro.s>
1
'WIUFACTIJR.E OF CLASS
CERNIICS, no0R COVERING
ETC (1000 70'5) I
:~~:s"fa\"~CT~:) I PAINT
'WI UF ACTUR.E
(10 TONS)I
INCINERATION TOTAL
EMISSIONS
1~5:;::P~:s> 1 (TONS)
72 TONS 61,900 TONS S5.240 TONS '760 TONS 29,450 TONS 151,422
~TERIAL FLOW 11110UCH 111E ECONOMY SHOWING PRI'tARY MISS ION SOURCES
- ZINC -
APPENDIX D
150
RR BENTON I TE STORAGE
CAR BIN
*
* BALLING
DRUM
STORAGE
BIN
GRATE
*
** * CONCENTRATOR FEEDER
IRON ORE ORE
FROM MINE CRUSHER
*
.... *
ORE
FINES
DRYING
HARDENING *
....VI RR
CAR
RR
*
CAR
TO STEEL TO STEEL
MILL MILL
I I
COOLER ~ COOLER ... DRYER
ATMOSPHERE
-- BRINE
'**
PREPARATION 0
I
H2 Cl
2 COMPRESSOR .... BLOW GAS
ABSORBER
ALTERNATING_ TRANSFORMER
...
,,. CURRENT
- AND
RECTIFIER
DIRECT _
- CURRENT
-
-
DIAPHRAGM
TYPE CELL
'if'**
-
MERCURY
FOR
ELECTRODES
*
CHLORINE
STORAGE
0 HOT CAUSTIC
,.....
V,
N CELL
LIQUOR
.... VACUUM
EVAPORATOR
LIQUOR
'
~
STORAGE
* MINOR EMISSION POINT SALT
COOLER
SLURRY
CAUSTIC
STORAGE
TANK TANK
RECOVERED BRINE
1 I,
CHARGING
CHUTE
' . PRIMARY
DRAFT
OIL OR GAS
FIRED ..- PRIMARY ..-
BURNING
PRIMARY
BURNER
CHAMBER
.-. MANUAL*
ASH
OIL OR GAS
' .
SECONDARY
REMOVAL
FIRED -
BURNING
SECONDARY CHAMBER
BURNER
1
EXHAUST
r------,
I
FLUE AFTERBURNER I
AND j4 - j (OPTIONAL) I
STACK L ______ J
,, **
ATMOSPHERE
* MINOR EMISSION POINT
** MAJOR EMISSION POINT
SOURCE: AIR POLLUTION ENGINEERING MANUAL
153
TO
ATMOSPHERE AIR-BLOWING
+ TANK
OIL
KNOCKOUT TO
ATMOSPHERE
GAS GAS TANK
STACK GAS FURNACE BURNER PIPELINE
OIL
t
KNOCKOUT t----1:a.1 STACK
TANK
, '*
FINISHED
* MINOR EMISSION POINT PRODUCT
~*
ORE
*
nux
STORAGE STORAGE
- ..-
BINS BINS GAS PLATE SCRUBBER
* CALCINE* *
TREATER
.
HEARTH
ROASTER
HOOD
,,
GAS ELECTROSTATIC
,, I ,, ' , ** ,, '*
PRECIPITATOR
MATTE_
WASTE
HEAT REVERBERATORY
. - DUST *
BOILER FURNACE ** CONVERTER
I,.
,,
-- SLAG -
1..-
AIR
TO SULFURIC
...
VI
' . BLISTER ACID PLANT
VI
** , COPPER
ELECTROSTATIC SLAG**
PRECIPITATOR DUMP '
.
ANODE
FURNACE
ATMO SPHERE
+**
'
STACK
,,**
ANODE
CASTING * .- QUENCHING * .-
TRANSPORT
ANODES
WHEEL TANK TO REFINERY
* MINOR EMISSION POINT
** MAJOR EMISSION POINT
SOURCE: MRI
* * *
HORIZONTAL CHLORINE
PREBAKE VERTICAL FLUX
ANODE SODERBERG SODERBERG
CELL CELL CELL
....
V,
(J\
ELECTRIC
POWER
RAW CASTING*
ALUMINUM FURNACE
*
OOAL GRINDING * ALUMINUM
CASTINGS
,'
WASTE
DISPOSAL ...
1...
FILTER --
SETilING
TANKS -
ATMOSPHERE
' .**
$r
I
7
POSSIBLE I
I CONTROL I
K DRYER
, .
--
UNBLEACHED
CLAY
AIR &
REACTION
~ BAGGING ~
STORAGE
AND/OR
SHIPMENT
ROTARY
I DEVICES
L ___ ....J
j4- KILN GASES
0
FUEL HEAT
BURNER ATMOSPHERE
1'~
H
REACTOR _r;;S-;IBLE~
CHAMBER .. , CONTROL
I DEVICES I
FOSSIL L __ _J
FUEL
,'
BLEACHED STORAGE
CLAY i-. BAGGING ~
AND/OR
SHIPMENT
157
OIL
TANKERS '**
STACK
-- *--
FORCED
OIL
TRUCKS
OIL
STORAGE t,----t:ti OIL PUMPS t,--~:N--1:-N FURNACE
CONTROL
DEVICES
- DRAFT
FAN
,,
I-'
u, OIL f-t ASH ASH
LIQUID
CID PIPELINE WASTES
,,
CURING - .-
ot
AMMONIATOR
GRANULATOR --
'*
DRYER ..- *'
COOLER ~ '*
SCREENING
* .- RUN OF PILE
PRODUCT
~'
GRANULATED
, . PRODUCT
SOURCE: MRI
STEAM--------..11'----
RECOVERED
REHEATING
STEAM
SOLUTION OF
..... ALUMINA TEMPERATURE PRECIPITATIO
(J\ EXPANSION UNDER _ _ __._,. EXCHANGE t-----OF Al (OH) J
0
PRESSURE
AL (OH)
3
PRIMING
..,.__ _,..SEPARATION OF FINAL ..__ _ _ _ __.SEPARATION OF
DILUTION RED MUDS FILTERING l(OH)
3
WASHING OF WASHING OF
CAL CI NATION Al (OH)
RED MUDS 3
* ~INOR EMISSION POINT.___ _ _ ____,
ATMOSPHERE
,j I
**
OIL
* -- OIL USUALLY GRAVITY . -- ...
TRUCK STORAGE FEED - FURNACE - STACK
GAS
PIPELINE --
* MINOR EMISSION POINT
** MAJOR EMISSION POINT
SOURCE: MITRE
* * *
BLAST
OR
**
ELECTRIC
FURNACE
'r
**
FERROALLOY
INGOTS
' ,
GRINDING *
FINISHED
INGOTS
162
GRAB
BUCKET *
CHARGING
HOPPER *
ATMOSPHERE
AND
FEEDING
-- FORCED
DRAFT
~,. DRYING
STOKER FAN
STACK
**
PRIMARY
COMBUSTION
.... ASH
CONVEYOR
'
STACK
CONTROL
DEVICES
--
SECONDARY
COMBUSTION
ASH
REMOVAL *
I
r----L---,
r - - ~- - I
I ASH
,- -
I
LI:ID -7 I
WASTE
I RD{OVAL I REMOVAL I
(OCNL)
IL _ _ _ _ _ .J (OCNL)
IL ______ J
163
COMBUSTIBLE
ATMOSPHERE
**
OIL
TANKERS
- WASTE
GAS FROM
PROCESS
I (OCNL)
STACK
w
I r - OCNL- -,
OIL
TRUCKS
* .- OIL
STORAGE
.- OIL
PUMPS
- .-
- FURNACE -- CONTROL
DEVICES
I
I
M L,_ _
FORCED
DRAFT
1
I
I
_ _ .J
FAN
I (OCNL)
--,
OIL
PIPELINE -
0
ASH
ASH
LIQ UID
WAS TE
*
ASH *
ASH
GAS
PIPELINE I
* MINOR EMISSION POINT
.
-
DISPOSAL DISPOSAL
SOURCE: MITRE
ID
FAN
PULP VENT
FILTER
MULT. GASES
(RED) EFF. MgO + so
EVAPO- 2
SPENT LIQUOR CONC'D
RATORS RED LIQUOR
PULP
MAGNESIA
MAKE-UP
*MINOR EMISSION POINT
SLURRY
* * MAJOR EMISSION POINT TANK
ORE PELLETS *
*
SCRAP
PILE
* *
COKE
PILE
OPEN BASIC ELECTRIC
* HEARTH OXYGEN ARC
FURNACE FURNACE FURNACE
*
BY-PRODUCT
RECOVERY
SILICA ATMOSPHERE
* **
GROG
FLUXES
ZINC
FUME AIR
COAL *
*
*
ORE
CONCENTRATE
BLEND **
SINTER
SINTER
BIN
UNREFINED
ZINC
OXIDE
POWDER
.... ZINC
....,
0\
PRODUCTS AIR
ATMOSPHERE
** **
STACK REFINER * REFINED
ZINC
PRODUCTS
ZINC
OXIDE
**
ROASTER PURIFIER BRIQUET CAST
CADMIUM
OXIDE
SOURCE: MRI
ASH
**
BLOW
MAKE-UP
SULFUR
TANK
HEAVY MULTIPLE-EFFECT
LIQUORia-------lEVAPORATORS
ACID
STORAGE
WEAK
WATER LIQUOR
CONDENSATE
STORAGE
*
SCREENS
BLEACHED
PULP
STORAGE
UNBLEACHED
STORAGE **
BLEACH PLANT