Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of JSTOR's Terms and Conditions of Use, available at .
http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp. JSTOR's Terms and Conditions of Use provides, in part, that unless
you have obtained prior permission, you may not download an entire issue of a journal or multiple copies of articles, and you
may use content in the JSTOR archive only for your personal, non-commercial use.
Please contact the publisher regarding any further use of this work. Publisher contact information may be obtained at .
http://www.jstor.org/action/showPublisher?publisherCode=sage. .
Each copy of any part of a JSTOR transmission must contain the same copyright notice that appears on the screen or printed
page of such transmission.
JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of
content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms
of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact support@jstor.org.
Sage Publications, Inc. is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to Gender and
Society.
http://www.jstor.org
Articles
RAINEDOZIER
Universityof Washington,Seattle
Gender is ubiquitousand, along with race and class, ordersmost aspects of daily
life. "Talkingaboutgender for most people is the equivalentof fish talking about
water"(Lorber1994, 13). Because transsexuals,transgenderedpeople, and others
at the bordersof genderand sex arefish out of water,they help illuminatestrengths
and weaknesses in common conceptions of gender.This projectclarifies the rela-
tionship between sex, gender, and sexual orientation through interviews with
female-to-male transsexualsand transgenderedpeople.' The interviewees chal-
lenge the underlyingassumptionin much of genderliteraturethatsex, gender,and
sexual orientationalign in highly correlated,relatively fixed, binary categories.
In the United States, the term "gender"is increasinglyused as a proxy for the
term "sex" (Auerbach1999). My own small rebellion againstthis tendency is to
respondliterally:When askedto indicatesex, I reply female; when askedfor gen-
der, I reply male. PerhapsI am doing little to change concepts of gender and sex,2
but at least I am on mailing lists thattargetmy diverseinterests!At the same time
thatthe public seems to be increasinglyusing "gender"as proxy for "sex,"gender
theorists are more clearly delineating the relationshipbetween sex and gender.
However,because gender and sex are seemingly inexplicablyconnected in most
aspects of social life, theorists have difficulty in retaining these delineations
throughouttheir work.
Intellectualshave been creating,critiquing,and advancingconcepts of gender
for the past 30 years.Generally,genderis definedas the socially constructedcorre-
late of sex. The conceptof genderas socially constructedhas been theorizedexten-
sively and illustratedin a varietyof arenasfrom the playgroundto the boardroom
(Fausto-Sterling2000; Kanter 1977; Kessler 1990; Lorber 1994; Messner 2000;
Thorne 1993; West and Zimmerman1987). However, many definitions positing
gender as an ongoing accomplishmentrely on sex as the "masterstatus"or "coat
rack"on which genderis socially constructed(Nicholson 1994). Althoughthereis
a general consensus that gender is socially constructed,theorists have too often
relied on sex as its initiatingpoint.
Delphy (1993) critiquedthe overrelianceon sex in defininggender.She claimed
that illustratingthe social constructionof genderby describingthe cross-cultural
variationin men's andwomen'sbehaviorandsocial roles only reinforcesthe notion
that gender originates in sex. The descriptionof cross-culturalvariationfurther
entrenchesthe notion of "genderas the contentwith sex as the container"(Delphy
1993, 3). Both Nicholson (1994) andDelphy (1993) challengedthe view thatgen-
der derives from sex and, in a sense, posited the opposite: That "genderis the
knowledgethatestablishesmeaningsfor bodily differences"(Scott 1988, 2). Gen-
der, then, is the concept that creates and defines sex differences.
Typically,sex is assignedbased on genitalinspectionat birth,butbiological sex
is a complex constellationof chromosomes,hormones,genitalia,andreproductive
organs.The study of intersexedand sex-reassignedchildrenillustratesthat social
notions of sex are employed when biological sex is ambiguous (Fausto-Sterling
2000; Kessler 1990). Because sex is an organizingprincipleof most societies, peo-
ple are forced to be one or the other,even when "only a surgicalshoehorncan put
them there"(Fausto-Sterling1993, 24). Given this, sex is both a physical attribute
and socially constructed.
Dozier / DOING SEX IN A GENDERED WORLD 299
Time from
Beginning of
Race/ Current Sexual Physical
Pseudonym Age Ethnicity Preference Transition TransitionStatus
NOTE: Bio women = biological women; bio men = biological men; FTMs = female-to-male
transsexual and transgendered people.
three of the respondentswere not living as trans even though they identified as
transgendered.
Fourteenof the respondentswere white, one was AfricanAmerican,two were
Latino, and one was Chinese American.Only one respondentdid not previously
identify as lesbian or bisexual. After transitioning,defining sexual orientation
becomes more complicatedsince sex, and sometimes sexual preference,changes.
Assigning sexual orientationrequiresassigning people to categoriesbased on the
sex of the sexual participants.Since many FTMs reportbeing newly attractedto
men aftertransitioning,it appearsthattheirorientationhas changedeven though,in
a sense, they remainhomosexual(previouslya lesbian,now gay). However,if they
are still primarilyinvolved with lesbians or with feminine women, it is difficultto
say their orientationhas changed when only their perceived sex is different. As
well, if an individual is primarily attracted to feminine people, but after
transitioningdates feminine men as well as feminine women, his genderedsexual
preferencehas not changed,so it is unclearwhetherthis describesa change in sex-
ual orientation.Because of these complexities,Table 1 recordsthe reportedsexual
preference as closely as possible without relying on usual categories of sexual
orientation.
Even though they were raised in a variety of locations, the great majorityof
respondentscurrentlylive in urbanareas.The sampleis probablynot representative
of the transpopulationin the United Statesbecauseit is overwhelminglyurbanand
emphasizesFTMs who have chosen not to assimilateinto mainstream,heterosex-
ual culture. These people, it seemed, might be betterpositioned to comment on
changes in the trans community regardingnotions of sex, gender, and sexuality
because they have access to greaternumbersof transpeople and are more often
engaged with others abouttransissues.
At the time of the interviews,five of the informantswere nonoperativeand not
takinghormones.Only one seemed certainhe neverwantedmedical intervention,
and thatwas due to a compromisedimmunesystem. Of these five, none have seri-
ously consideredtakinghormones,butfourexpresseda strongdesirefor chest sur-
gery thatinvolves removalof the breastsand repositioningof the nipples if neces-
sary.Two could not have surgeryfor financialreasonsandone for medicalreasons,
and one was hesitantfor family and political reasons.3
Only 1 of the 18 intervieweeshad had chest surgery,was not takinghormones,
and had no furtherplans for medical intervention.Twelve of the 13 taking hor-
mones had had chest surgeryor were planningto do so. The remainingindividual
was not consideringchest surgerydue to concerns about keloids due to his dark
skin.4He expressed frustrationat how little informationwas availableto darker-
skinnedtransmenaboutthe potentialeffects of surgery.
I interviewedFTMsusing a generalset of questionsregardingtheirexperiences
with the medical community,the transcommunity,their families, and their rela-
tionship to masculinity. I did not set out to prove a preformulatedhypothesis
regardingthe relationshipbetween sex, gender, and sexual orientation;nor did I
predeterminethe ideal numberof respondents.Instead,in a mannerderivedfrom
304 GENDER & SOCIETY / June 2005
FINDINGS
So, those fairly feminine men thatI have datedhave been very undeniablymale, but
theyhaven'tbeena hundredpercentmasculineall thetime,andI thinkI'velearned
frommyrelationships withthemto sortof relax.Lightenupa little;nailpolishisn't
goingtokillanybody.I thinkthatI'mmoreabletobeatpeacewithallof theaspectsof
myself.... [Now]I'mnotgoingto go outof mywayto butchit up.I'mmalelooking
enoughto getawaywithit, whereaswhenI didthatkindof stuffbeforeI transitioned
peoplewerelike,"Well,you'renotbutchenoughto be a man."(Billy)
CHANGING INTERACTION
unsettling.In Bellevue [his formerjob], it was a joke. 'Pete's here, so you better
shut up.' Because they're sexist, they're homophobic,they'reracist. And I would
say, 'This is not somethingI thinkyou shouldbe talkingaboutin the lunch room.'
So I was constantlyturningheads because I'm kind of an unusualguy" (Pete).
Acting like a "sensitivenew age guy" did not challenge Pete's masculinityor
essentialmalenessbutsimply definedhim as "kindof an unusualguy."He was able
to assume this role because his genderwas establishedand supportedthroughhis
unquestionablymale appearance.
Intervieweesfoundthattheirinteractionswith both men andwomen changedas
they transitioned.Aftertransitioning,a few FTMs,like the previouslyquotedinter-
viewee, maintainedstrongfeminist ideals and workedhardto change to appropri-
ate behaviorfor a feminist man. This was an effort as behavioralexpectationsfor
men andbutchlesbiansdifferradically,andwhatmay be attributedto assertiveness
in a masculinewoman becomes intolerablein a man:
I am a Black male. I'm the suspect.I'm the one you have to be afraidof. I'm the one
fromwhomyouhavetogetaway,soyouhavetocrossthestreet,youhavetolockyour
doors.Youhaveto clutchwhatever you'vegota littlecloserto yourbody.... It'svery
difficultto get whiteFTMsto understand
that.... [Asa Blackperson],if I go intoa
store,I amfollowed.NowI amopenlyfollowed;beforeit was,"Oh,let'shidebehind
therackof breadorsomethingso thatshewon'tseeus."Nowit's,"Oh,it'sa guy,he's
probably gota gun;he'sprobably
gota knife.Wehaveto knowwherehishandsareat
all times."(Rogelio)
Sexual behavior is another site that more clearly explicates the relationship
between sex andgender.Sexual orientationis based not solely on the objectof sex-
ual and erotic attraction,but also on the sex categoryand genderperformancecre-
atedin the contextof sexualinteraction.The performanceof genderis crucialin the
sexual arena for two reasons: First, because sexuality is expressed through the
body,which may or may not align with an individual'sgenderidentityand,second,
because heterosexualintercoursecan symbolize the social inequalities between
men and women. Altering the body alters the sexual relationshipsof FTMs by
changingtheir gender/sexlocation in sexual interaction.
Many FTMs change sexual orientationafter transitioningor, at the least, find
that their object attractionexpands to include both sexes. Devor (1997) found a
large increase in the number of FTMs who, after transitioning,were sexually
attractedto gay men. Why do many transmenchange sexual orientationafter
transitioning?Even the earliestsexualitystudiessuch as the Kinsey report(Kinsey,
Pomeroy,and Martin 1948) provide evidence that individuals'attractions,fanta-
sies, andbehaviorsdo not alwaysalign with theirprofessedsexualorientation.Cur-
rently,a diversegay cultureandthe increasedease of living a gay lifestyle have cre-
ated a wide varietyof options for people with attractionsto the same or both sexes
(Seidman2002). As well, coinciding with a rise in gay and lesbian culturesin the
1960s and 1970s was a heightened feminist consciousness. For some feminists,
sexual relationshipswith men are problematicbecause of the power dynamic and
broaderculturalcommentaryenacted in heterosexualrelations.Bisexual women
sometimesfind the dynamicuntenableandchoose to identify as lesbians. Aaron,a
previouslybisexual woman, confirms:
In another example, Dick was primarily involved with men and briefly identi-
fied as a lesbian before transitioning. He found sexual orientation and gender iden-
tity to be inexplicably entangled as he struggled to clarify his identity. When he was
a woman and in a long-term relationship with a man, he began to identify as queer.
He assumed that his male partner was incongruent with his queer orientation. Over
time, he realized that the sex of his partner was not as crucial to his queer identity as
was the gender organization of the relationship. Identifying as queer was an attempt
to express the desire for interaction congruent with gender identity rather than
expressing the desire for a partner of a particular sex.
Heterosexuality, then, is a problem for these FTMs not because of object choice
but because of the gendered meaning created in intimate and sexual interaction that
situates them as women. Most of the FTMs in the sample who changed sexual ori-
entation or attractions after transitioning did not previously identify as bisexual or
heterosexual. Two key changes allowed them to entertain the idea of sexual
involvement with men. First, the relationship and power dynamic between two men
is very different from that between a man and a woman. Second, in heterosexual
interactions previous to transitioning, the sexual arena only reinforced FTMs'
social and sexual position as women, thus conflicting with their gender identity.
After transitioning, sexual interaction with men can validate gender identity:
So, it's okay for me to datemen who were bornmen becauseI don'tfeel like they treat
me weird.I couldn't standthis feminizationof me, especially in the bedroom.Now I
feel like I actuallyhavea sex drive.Hormonesdidn'tmakeme horny,the combination
of me transitioningand taking hormonesmade me have maybe a normalsex drive.
(Dick)
Dozier / DOING SEX IN A GENDERED WORLD 313
I'venevertotallydismissedmenassexualpartners
ingeneral,butI knewthatI'mvery
muchdykeidentified.ButI thinkbeingmasculineandhavinga malerecognizeyour
masculinityisjustas sexyas a womanrecognizingyourmasculinity,
as opposedto a
manrelatingto youas a woman.(Trevor)
CONCLUSION
NOTES
REFERENCES
Auerbach,JudithD. 1999. From the SWS president:Genderas proxy.Gender & Society 13:701-703.
Bolin, Anne. 1988. In searchof Eve: Transsexualritesofpassage. SouthHadley,MA: Bergin& Garvey.
Bornstein,Kate. 1995. Genderoutlaw: On men, women,and the restof us. New York:Vintage.
Califia, Patrick.1997. Sex changes: Thepolitics of transgenderism.San Francisco:Cleis Press.
Cromwell,Jason. 1999. Transmenand FTMs:Identities,bodies, genders,and sexualities.Urbana:Uni-
versity of Illinois Press.
Delphy, Christine.1993. Rethinkingsex and gender.Women'sStudiesInternationalForum16:1-9.
Devor, Holly [AaronDevor]. 1989. Genderblending: Confrontingthe limits of duality.Bloomington:
IndianaUniversityPress.
---. 1997. FTM:Female-to-maletranssexualsin society. Bloomington:IndianaUniversityPress.
- . 1998. Sexual-orientationidentities,attractions,andpracticesof female-to-maletranssexuals.In
Currentconcepts in transgenderidentity,edited by Dallas Denny.New York:Garland.
---. 1999. Book review of "Second skins: The body narrativesof transsexuality"by Jay Prosser.
Journal of Sex Research36:207-208.
Devor,AaronH. 2004. Witnessingandmirroring:A fourteenstage model of transsexualidentityforma-
tion. Journalof Gay and Lesbian Psychotherapy8: 41-67.
Ekins,Richard.1997. Malefemaling: A groundedtheoryapproachto cross-dressingand sex-changing.
New York:Routledge.
Fausto-Sterling, Anne. 1993.Thefive sexes:Whymaleandfemalearenotenough.Sciences33 (2): 20-24.
- . 2000. Sexing the body: gender politics and the constructionof sexuality.New York:Basic
Books.
Feinberg,Leslie. 1998. Transliberation:Beyondpink or blue. Boston: Beacon.
Halberstam,Judith. 1998. Female masculinity.Durham,NC: Duke UniversityPress.
Herdt,Gilbert. 1981. Guardiansof theflutes: Idioms of masculinity.New York:McGraw-Hill.
Kanter,RosabethMoss. 1977. Men and womenof the corporation.New York:Basic Books.
Kessler,SuzanneJ. 1990. The medical constructionof gender:Case managementof intersexedinfants.
Signs: Journalof Womenin Cultureand Society 16:3-27.
Kessler, Suzanne J. and Wendy McKenna. 1978. Gender: An ethnomethodologicalapproach. New
York:JohnWiley.
Kinsey,AlfredC., WardellB. Pomeroy,andClyde E. Martin.1948. Sexualbehaviorin the humanmale.
Philadelphia:W. B. Saunders.
Lewins, Frank. 1995. Transsexualismin society: A sociology of male-to-female transsexuals. Mel-
bourne:MacmillanEducationAustralia.
Lorber,Judith. 1994. Paradoxesof gender.New Haven, CT: Yale UniversityPress.
- . 1999. Embattledterrain:Genderand sexuality.In Revisioninggender,edited by Myra Marx
Ferree,JudithLorber,and Beth Hess. ThousandOaks, CA: Sage.
Lucal, Betsy. 1999. Whatit means to be genderedme: Life on the boundariesof a dichotomousgender
system. Gender & Society 13:781-97.
Messner,Michael A. 2000. Barbiegirls versus sea monsters:Childrenconstructinggender.Gender &
Society 14:765-84.
Nicholson,Linda.1994. Interpretinggender.Signs:Journalof Womenin CultureandSociety20:79-105.
Parker,Richard,andPeterAggleton. 1999. Culture,society and sexuality:A reader.Los Angeles: UCLA
Press.
Prosser,Jay. 1998. Secondskins: Thebodynarrativesoftranssexuality.New York:ColumbiaUniversity
Press.
Rubin,Henry.2003. Self-mademen:Identityand embodimentamong transsexualmen. Nashville, TN:
VanderbiltUniversityPress.
Schippers,M. 2000. The social organizationof sexualityandgenderin alternativehardrock:An analysis
of intersectionality.Gender & Society 14:747-64.
Scott, Joan. 1988. Genderand the politics of history.New York:ColumbiaUniversityPress.
316 GENDER & SOCIETY / June 2005
Seidman, Steven. 2002. Beyond the closet: The transformationof gay and lesbian life. New York:
Routledge.
Thorne,Barrie. 1993. Genderplay: Girls and boys in school. New Brunswick,NJ: RutgersUniversity
Press.
West, Candace,and Don Zimmerman.1987. Doing gender Gender & Society 1:125-51.