Etp Guideline (May 2017) PDF

ENGINEERING TEAM PROJECT (MDB 3053)
GUIDELINES
------
MAY 2017
UNIVERSITI TEKNOLOGI PETRONAS
31750 Bandar Seri Iskandar, Perak Darul Ridzuan, Malaysia.
Open
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Contents Page
_______________________________________________________________________
1. INTRODUCTION . . . . . . . 4
2. OBJECTIVES AND LEARNING OUTCOMES . . . 4
3. SCOPE OF PROJECT . . . . . . 5
4. SUMMARY OF PROJECT WORK . . . . . 5
4.1 Project Proposal . . . . . . 5
4.2 Progress Report . . . . . . 6
4.3 Development of Prototype / Model . . . . 6
4.4 Poster Presentation . . . . . . 6
4.5 Demonstration of Working Prototype / Model . . . 6
4.6 Engineering Design Exhibition (SEDEX) . . 7
4.7 Oral Presentation . . . . . . 7
4.8 Final Report . . . . . . . 7
5. ETP COORDINATORS . . . . . . 8
6. SUPERVISORS . . . . . . . 8
6.1 Supervisor 1 . . . . . . . 8
6.2 Supervisor 2 . . . . . . . 8
7. ETP ANNOUNCEMENTS . . . . . . 8
8. ATTENDANCE AND MEETINGS . . . . . 9
9. EVALUATION . . . . . . . 9
10. PROJECT EXPENDITURE . . . . . 9
11. LABORATORY . . . . . . . 13
12. PLAGIARISM . . . . . . . 13
13. WRITING FORMAT FOR FINAL REPORT . . . 13
Engineering Team Project (ETP): May 2017 Semester Page 2

Open
14. APPENDICES . . . . . . . 18
APPENDICES:
Page
APPENDIX I IMPORTANT
DATES 18 ..................................................................................................................
APPENDIX II PROJECT ASSESSMENT RUBRIC....................................................19
APPENDIX III PROJECT PROPOSAL SCORE SHEET ............................................ 21
APPENDIX IV PROGRESS REPORT SCORE SHEET .............................................. 22
APPENDIX V FABRICATION SCORE SHEET ......................................................... 23
APPENDIX VI POSTER EVALUATION SHEET ........................................................ 24
APPENDIX VII DEMO. OF WORKING PROTOTYPE/MODEL ............................... 25
APPENDIX VIII ORAL PRESENTATION: GROUP ASSESSMENT ......................... 26
APPENDIX IX FINAL REPORT SCORE SHEET ....................................................... 27
APPENDIX X CALCULATION OF INDIVIDUAL CONTRIBUTION (IC)............ 28
APPENDIX XI RESULT
COMPILATION 29 ..................................................................................................................
APPENDIX XII LOGBOOK SUMMARY ....................................................................... 30
APPENDIX XIII PROJECT PROPOSAL CONTENT .................................................... 31
APPENDIX XIV SAMPLE OF REFERENCING FORMAT .......................................... 32
APPENDIX XV SAMPLE OF COVER PAGE FOR FINAL REPORT ....................... 33
APPENDIX XVI STUDENTS REQUISITION FORM. .................................................. 34
APPENDIX XVII STUDENTS REQUISITION FORM SAMPLE .............................. 35
APPENDIX XVIII JUSTIFICATION LETTER .................................................................. 36
APPENDIX XIX JUSTIFICATION LETTER SAMPLE ............................................. 37
APPENDIX XX ETP CLAIM BREAKDOWN FORM ................................................... 38
APPENDIX XXI PEER EVALUATION TEMPLATE ................................................... 39

Open
1. INTRODUCTION
This course is offered to the 3rd year engineering students. The subject is designed to ensure
that students will acquire the knowledge in conducting research and development by
working in a team. This includes conducting literature research, preparing project proposal,
performing preliminary design concepts, simulation, and evaluation for the best concept
and designing the selected concept.
Students will be divided into groups that consist of five to six members of various
disciplines namely Mechanical, Electrical & Electronics, Chemical, Civil and Petroleum
Engineering. Please note that in view of the dissimilar number of students registering for
this module from each engineering program, there are groups that may not have students
from all five engineering disciplines. One or two supervisors will be assigned to each
group.
2. OBJECTIVES AND LEARNING OUTCOMES
The objectives of the Engineering Team Project (ETP) course are as follows:
To inculcate teamwork spirit.

To develop leadership skills as well as technical competency in:
o delegation of various tasks
o analysing engineering problems
o performing engineering design
o enhancing software related skills
To broaden the knowledge on commercially available off-the-shelf equipment as
well as industrial equipment.
To develop knowledge in integrating components into a comprehensive working
system.
To provide a platform for advanced design courses.
To nurture creativity, innovativeness, and business acumen.
To provide exposure on project management skills
The course outcomes are; at the end of this course, students should be able to:
1. Apply engineering knowledge and solve engineering design problem.

2. Work in a multi-disciplinary team-based project work.
3. Apply the principle of project management.
4. Apply proper design process to produce creative and innovative solution.
5. Demonstrate effective communication, report writing, presentation and
entrepreneur skills.
Note: These are NOT the objectives of the project work you are working on.

Open
3. SCOPE OF PROJECT
The scope of the project includes:
To generate conceptual designs

To perform necessary engineering calculations
To generate engineering drawings of the selected concept
To develop a working model or prototype
The final result of the project shall be exhibited in the form of engineering drawings,
reports, and a WORKING MODEL or PROTOTYPE. The conceptual design should
incorporate as many as possible elements or components of Electrical / Electronic /
Mechanical / Chemical / Civil / Petroleum engineering. The approach to solutions and
methodologies such as selection of materials, problem analysis etc., shall be based on
fundamental engineering calculations. The feasibility and suitability of a project to be taken
as an ETP project are assessed by using the Project Assessment Rubric in Appendix II.
4. SUMMARY OF PROJECT WORK
Please refer to Appendix I for the schedule of the present semester.
4.1 Project Proposal
Each group shall discuss among members to come out with a suitable and feasible project
and more importantly within the time frame as specified in Appendix I. When an
agreement has been reached among the team members and also the supervisor, a project
proposal must be submitted for assessment. Prior to submission, the project proposal must
be discussed with the respective supervisors to determine the scope, problems, and
practicality of the proposed project. The content of the proposal must be based on the
format in Appendix XIII. The report shall not exceed 12 pages including the appendices.
Each group must submit the project proposal to the supervisor by the due date specified in
Appendix I. The proposal will be assessed based on the marking scheme in Appendix III.
Note: Supervisors need to ensure that any draft proposal be reviewed and returned promptly to
ensure that students are able to submit their work on time.

Open
4.2 Progress Report
A progress report must be submitted to the supervisor by the due date specified in
Appendix I. The report will be graded based on the marking scheme in Appendix IV. The
report, which shall not exceed 12 pages including the appendices, shall comprise:
details of the activities that need to be carried out
identification of potential problems
a few conceptual designs that have been considered
necessary preliminary engineering calculations, data collection and benefit-cost
analysis that have been used in deciding the final design.
4.3 Development of Prototype / Model

Throughout the project, the supervisor will monitor the overall progress and development
of the project through meetings and logbooks as well as progress report. The prototype or
model of the project must be completed by the date specified in Appendix I. Upon
completion, the group must make an arrangement with the supervisor for assessment of the
prototype or model. The assessment will generally be based on the planning, execution and
the quality of the prototype or model. Please refer to the format in Appendix V for the
guidelines of the assessment.
4.4 Poster Presentation

Each group will be required to present their results and findings in the form of ONE A-1
size poster with a portrait-layout. The poster presentation provides an opportunity for
students to expose or share their work, knowledge and experience with other students and
also with lecturers. The poster from each group will be examined, unmanned, by one or
more examiners in a session that will be advised further. Appendix VI provides the
guidelines on the poster exhibition assessment criteria. The tentative time for the session
is indicated in Appendix I. The use of more than one poster will be penalised.
Selected posters will be exhibited in the Engineering Design Exhibition (SEDEX), which
is described in Section 4.6. The selection will be made based on the scores given by the
examiners for the posters and the demonstration/simulation of the working
prototype/model.
4.5 Demonstration / Simulation of Working Prototype/Model
All groups are also required to demonstrate or simulate a working prototype or model of
their project before one or more examiners (non-supervisor). An actual model
demonstration is preferable, however, in certain cases, a computer simulation might be
acceptable depending on the nature of the project. This demonstration/simulation will be
assessed based on the criteria specified in Appendix VII.
The scores for the demonstration/simulation, together with the poster, will be used by the
ETP Coordinators in selecting groups that will participate in the SEDEX.

Open
4.6 Science & Engineering Design Exhibition (SEDEX)
The Science & Engineering Design Exhibition (SEDEX) is an event organized by the
university towards the end of every semester. It provides opportunities for students to
present their project works, mainly through the ETP and Final Year Project (FYP) courses.
Only selected projects will be allowed invited to participate. For ETP, selection will
generally be made based on the score obtained by groups in the evaluations for posters and
demonstrations.
All participants will be given certificates, and in addition winners will be awarded. Projects
with certain outstanding quality and innovation will be selected to represent the university
at national and international level competitions. It must be noted that the operational
matters of the SEDEX is beyond the responsibility of ETP supervisors and coordinators.
There shall also be no extra marks for groups that participate or win awards in the SEDEX.
Certificates, awards and details of the SEDEX should be obtained only from the SEDEX
Committee.
4.7 Oral Presentation
During the demonstration session, students shall deliver a presentation on their findings
using own laptop. Assessment on visual aspects, clarity of presentation, logic, knowledge
of subject matter and the overall content of the presentation will be made on a group basis
(Appendix VIII). Each group member must present some portion of the materials. Each
group will be allocated 10 minutes for the presentation, and another 5 minutes for a
question and answer session. The examiners will be the appointed lecturers, other than the
group supervisor.
4.8 Final Report
Each group shall submit a final report by the due date specified in Appendix I. The report
will be assessed using the form in Appendix IX. In this report, the ultimate results and
findings of the project shall be presented. The report shall be assessed based on:
Critical review of current problems/solutions
Literature review
Development of alternatives and options
Decision making processes
Final Design (engineering drawing)
Technical/Scientific aspects/support
Business and economic considerations
Application/Viability of selected design
Suggestion for area of improvements
Recommendations for future work
Please note that the report must be limited to thirty (30) pages excluding appendices,
figures and drawings.

Open
5. COORDINATORS
The following lecturers are appointed by the Head of the Mechanical Engineering
Programme as the ETP Coordinators.
1. Dr Hilmi Hussin (05 368 7027, hilmi_hussin@utp.edu.my)

2. Dr Setyamartana Parman (05 368 7197, setyamartana@utp.edu.my)
3. AP. Dr. Abd. Rahim Othman (05 3687200, rahim.othman@utp.edu.my)
4. Dr Mazli Mustapha (05 368 7208, mazli.mustapha@utp.edu.my)
The responsibilities of the Coordinators can be summarised as follows:
Managing and implementing the ETP course.

Assigning student groups and supervisors.
Advising supervisors on the project assessment or any other problems
encountered during the project work.
Assigning examiners and coordinate seminar presentation and poster exhibition.
Facilitate expenditure claims.
Compiling students results.
6. SUPERVISORS
6.1 Supervisor 1
Evaluating the project proposal, progress report, fabrication and final report based
on the rubric provided on timely basis.
Advising students on the preparation of their design projects, including but not
limited to the technical, economical and management aspects.
Monitoring of student's progress against Gantt chart through their weekly progress
reports.
Certifying students expenditure claims.
Obtaining claims and disbursement to students.
Assigning IC score to individual student appropriately.
6.2 Supervisor 2 or Co-Supervisor
A Supervisor 2 may be nominated to assist in the supervision of a team. The responsibilities

of the Supervisor 2 are:
Where applicable, guiding students or providing support in any specific areas

including but not limited to soft skills, language, report writing, business acumen,
etc., as and when necessary within the project time frame.
Representing Supervisor 1 in executing the tasks stipulated in Clause 6.1 under the
circumstances whereby Supervisor 1 is not able to perform the task(s).

Open
7. ANNOUNCEMENTS
All announcements regarding ETP will be made through e-Learning or posters at strategic
locations (e.g. Pocket C and Pocket D). Students MUST regularly visit these sites to keep
themselves updated and informed of all important dates and announcements.
8. ATTENDANCE AND MEETINGS
Students are required to conduct meetings regularly among themselves on project

implementation. In addition, all groups are required to arrange weekly meetings with the
supervisor. The attendance of group members will be recorded. The logbook, the
attendance record as well as students active participation will be monitored to calculate for
Individual Contribution (IC) (see Section 9. EVALUATION).
Each student must forward logbooks individually to the supervisor during weekly
meetings. The verified logbook shall be returned at the end of the meeting. Each student
shall bring the compilation of the logbooks to the weekly meeting.
9. EVALUATION
Students will be evaluated based on their capability in undertaking the project, producing
the written report and presenting the result. The main components of evaluation are given
in Table 1. In general, the evaluation of the group will be carried out by supervisors
(55 %), appointed examiners (40 %), and peer evaluation (5 %), with a total of 100 %. The
evaluation forms for each component are given in the Appendices.
The individual score for Individual Contribution (IC) (see Appendix X) described in
Section 8. ATTENDANCE AND MEETINGS, and peer evaluation (Appendix XXI)
will be used to differentiate the individual score for each student in a group. Each student
will also be evaluated based on prescribed criteria by other members of the team, by means
of peer evaluation. Instructions on peer evaluation will be provided approximately in the
last 3 weeks of the semester.
10. PROJECT EXPENDITURE
In building the prototype or model, each group may request project fund of up to RM 200
to purchase approved components or materials that are not available in laboratories at UTP.
Figure 1 shows the ETP Purchase Requisition Flow Chart that students need to follow in
order to purchase project materials, in which failure to comply with this procedure may
result in non-payment of the claims. Table 2 provides further explanation to the process
flow chart.

Open
Table 1: ETP Grading Structure.
Assessment Contribution
Tentative Components Evaluation
Time Supervisor Panel of Peer Forms
Examiners Evaluation
W3 Project Proposal Appendix III
10 %
W7 Progress Report Appendix IV
10 %
Fabrication of Prototype or
W 10 10 % Appendix V
Model
W 11 Poster Evaluation 10 % Appendix VI
Demonstration of Prototype or
W 11 20% Appendix VII
Model
Group & Individual Oral
W 11 10 % Appendix VIII
Presentation
W 14 Peer Evaluation 5% Appendix XXI
W 14 Final Report 15% Appendix IX

Individual Contribution
Continuous (Logbook & Meeting, Active 10% Appendix X
Participation)
Total 55 % 40 % 5%

Open
Start
1. - Fill up FORM 03 (App XVI)

- Obtain verification from Lab Executive
Amount Y
exceed 2. Prepare justification letter (App XVIII)
RM200?
N
N
3. - Obtain signature from SV for FORM 03 and justification letter

(if exceed RM200)
- Submit FORM 03 and justification letter to coordinator
Deadline: 15 Nov 2013
4. Purchase items
5. - Arrange original receipts according to sequence in FORM 03

- Paste original receipts on A4 papers
(Students are strongly advised to make copy of all receipts)
- Fill up ETP Claim Breakdown Form (App XX)
6. Submit ETP Claim Breakdown Form and receipts

(hardcopies and softcopies) to ETP Coordinator
7. Collect claims from SV
End
Legend
SV Supervisor
Note: 1. Submission of FORM 03 does not guarantee approval.

2. All deadlines stated are to be complied strictly. Late submissions will not be entertained.
Figure 1: Purchase Requisition Flow Chart

Open
Table 2: Explanation to Purchase Requisition Flow Chart.
Flow
Chart Description Remarks
Item #
- Fill up FORM 03 (App XVI) - Fill up FORM 03 completely. Refer sample, App XVII.
1
- Obtain verification from Lab Executive - Obtain verification from Lab Executive on availability of
the items in UTP.
- Obtain signature from SV for FORM 03 - Justification letter is applicable for purchase exceeding
2 and justification letter (if exceed RM200) RM200. Refer sample, App XIX.
- Prepare justification letter (App XVIII)
- Incomplete or inaccurate information will result in delay or
- Submit FORM 03 and justification letter to
3 non-approval.
Coordinator (make copy for future reference)
- Late submissions will not be entertained.
- Items purchased must be according to FORM 03 submitted.
- If additional items are required, a new FORM 03 must be
submitted to the coordinator.
4 Purchase items
- Claims of additional items not listed in the first FORM 03
will be honoured based on the discretion of coordinator.
- Purchases are made using students' own money in advance.
- Arrange original receipts according to
- Receipts should be arranged according to sequence in
sequence in FORM 03
FORM 03.
- Paste original receipts on A4 papers
- All original receipts are to be pasted on A4 papers.
5 (Students are strongly advised to make copy
- Copies of receipts are to be retained by students.
of all receipts)
- Fill up App XX completely, including Receipt No. for all
- Fill up ETP Claim Breakdown Form
items.
(App XX)
Submit ETP Claim Breakdown Form and
- Late submissions will not be entertained.
6 receipts to Coordinator in both softcopy and
- Please e-mail the softcopy version as well.
hardcopy forms.
- Students are responsible to follow up with SV on payment.

7 Collect claims from SV
Please allow some time for payment to reach SV.

Open
11. LABORATORY
Students are allowed to use the laboratory for the purposes of experiments or fabrications
of their model or prototype. The technicians who are in-charged for the laboratory related
to this course are responsible in co-ordinating the lab operations, which include the Health,
Safety and Environment (HSE) aspects, scheduling of equipment, checking and providing
consumables. Students are required to notify the technicians on their intent to use the lab
in advance. All lab regulations must be complied. Lab coats and proper attire shall be worn
in the lab. Each group must carry out housekeeping and the technicians will monitor this.
Failure to comply with the regulations may result in deduction of marks by the
Coordinators.
12. PLAGIARISM
Plagiarism is strictly prohibited and is a serious offence. Kindly refer to Section 5.1 of the
UTPs undergraduate handbook, A Guide to University Academic Policies and Procedures.
Any work that is found to have been copied or plagiarized will NOT be assessed.
13. WRITING FORMAT FOR FINAL REPORT
The writing format of the ETP final report should follow the UTP standard as described
below. The report consists of many parts arranged in a certain order. It is recommended
that the contents be in the following order, although not every report will include all the
items listed.
a) Title
b) Acknowledgement
c) Executive Summary / Abstract
d) Table of Contents
e) Background of Project Work
f) Identification and Definition of Problem
g) Objective and Scope
h) Project Management
i) Literature Review
j) Theory
k) Procedure / Methodology
l) Engineering Analysis
m) Business / Economic Analysis
n) Discussion of Results
o) Conclusion
p) Recommendation
q) References
r) Appendices

Open
General Writing Format
Students must follow specific guidelines for writing the report as stated below.
a) Language
The report must be written in English Language.
b) Font and Spacing
All text should be double-spaced (Times New Roman regular font-style, size 12)
written on one side of each white A4 paper. However, foot note, computer program
codes (must be reduced to font size 8), and captions for tables and figures should
be single-spaced.
c) Length
The report shall not be more than 30 pages, excluding the appendices. Students are
encouraged to be brief and concise in their writing and avoid jargon and passive
voice as much as possible.
d) Numbering
All pages must be numbered in proper sequence from introduction to the end of the
report including pages on figures, tables, computer programs and appendices. Page
numbers appear by themselves and are not to be enclosed in parenthesis, hyphens
or other decorative symbols. Page number must be positioned at the bottom and
centred.
e) Margin
The top, bottom and right margins are 25 mm. The left margin must be 40 mm.
f) Mathematical Text
Mathematical text must be spaced out, superscript and subscript must be clearly
shown as such.
g) Heading
Major headings, such as INTRODUCTION, should be in capitals. Times New

Roman and font size 14 should be used. Secondary headings such as Example, the
first letter should be capitalised, bold and font size 12 should be used, and tertiary
heading should be in Times New Roman.

Open
h) Tables and Figures
Tables and figures less than a page in size should be inserted into the text near the
point of reference with a three-line space above and below. Tables should be
continuous and not carried over to the succeeding page. Margins limits are the
same as text full-page. All tables and figures should be numbered consecutively.
Tables and figures are must be within the main text. Table captions should be
positioned at the top middle of each table. The captions for figures should be
positioned at the bottom middle of each figure.
i) References
The method of writing references must follow the standard format. See
Appendix XIV for samples of reference format.
j) Title Page
The title page should be set out in accordance with the Appendix XV and should
include the followings:
- name of the group members in FULL complete with the Matrix Number.
- title of the ETP project
- month and year in which the ETP final report is submitted
Students must submit one copy of their ETP final report to the respective supervisor
on week 14.
General Content
This section will elaborate more about the general content needed in each part of the report
format.
a) Title
The project title should reflect the focus on core issues of the research work.
b) Acknowledgements
Acknowledgements should include the names of the contributors to the project

work including the supervisors and members of the group, preferably not more than
one page.

Open
c) Summary / Abstract
The summary or abstract briefly covers the content of the work. It should contain
the (i) Objectives of the project; i.e., state the core issue, research question or
objective of the design work, (ii) Methodology; i.e., briefly describe the methods
or techniques used in achieving the objectives, (iii) Results; i.e., describe the results
obtained from the methodology employed, and (iv) Conclusions; i.e., interpretation
of the results in relation to the theory or hypotheses. Draw conclusions and state
the implications. The summary or abstract is presented so that any other reader,
who is attracted by the title of the project, can know a little more without having to
read the whole report. Any reference to the literature is not made in the abstract but
if such references are necessary, they should be footnoted. Abstract should not be
more than one page.
d) Table of Contents
Table of contents lists all headings and sub-headings, tables, figures, appendices,
bibliography with the page numbers.
e) Background of Project Work
The background covers the research project, the definition of the problem, the
achievement expected from the project, the importance of the project as well as the
range and depth of the study.
f) Objective and Scope
The aim of the study includes main/general matter that needs to be achieved or
implemented. Objectives are more detailed and closely related to aim. Scope is the
boundary for the research work planned by the students to ensure the feasibility of
the project to be carried out within the given time frame.
g) Project Management
Project management should focus on progress monitoring and task allocation with
the usage of Gantt chart.
h) Literature Review
Literature review includes the review of written materials on the topic and area
chosen. It gives the background of the current studies of the problem area chosen
from various written sources of references. This section reviews the previous
research analytically, critically and objectively.

Open
i) Theory, Methodology and Procedure
This section shall contain all the relevant theories, hypotheses, facts and data
obtained from references and literature reviews. The theories included must be
relevant with the objectives and the findings of the project, thus allowing the
comparison between the results achieved and the theory to be outstanding. The
methodology must be relevant and used in the project.
j) Engineering Analysis
This section should include data gathering, data analysis, tools required, possible
solutions to problems, decision making on the selected solution and project
benefits.
k) Discussion on Result and Findings
This section presents the finding or outcome of the research work. It is suggested
that the results obtained be presented clearly in the form of tables and figures such
as graphs, diagrams or others.
l) Conclusions
Conclusion highlights whether the work completed complies with the set objective
and the significance of the findings. Recommendation for future work should be
stated in this section to ensure the set objective can be achieved and improved or
even expanded.
m) References
This section is to record all references used for preparing the proposed project. Use
the standard format as given in the appendix.
n) Appendices
Lengthy calculations, figures, raw data, computer programs/source codes, outputs,

etc. are to be enclosed as appendices. They should be titled and numbered according
to chronological order. Each appendix is preferably named using capital letters and
the appendices need to be listed down in the Table of Contents.

Open
APPENDIX I: IMPORTANT DATES
* By co-ordinator: List of students, groups, supervisors and topics
Note: The above schedule is subjected to change. Please check messages in the e-learning regularly for updates.

Open
Dr Subarna Sivapalan
APPENDIX II: PROJECT ASSESSMENT RUBRIC
ETP Group: _______________________________ Project Title: _______________________________

Purpose: The assessment aims to measure the feasibility and suitability of a project to be taken as an ETP project.
Instruction: 1. Assign the appropriate score to each criteria, according to the most fitting description provided.
2. Sum up the total scores for all criteria in the last column.
3. Refer to the score indication table.
Criteria / Score 4 3 2 1 Score

1. Opportunity for teamwork Supports development of Reasonable opportunity Not much opportunity for No opportunity for
development teamwork for development of teamwork development teamwork development
[to assess suitability of project as teamwork and as the tasks are highly
Reflects interdependence balanced participation segmented and
means to inculcate teamwork] and balanced participation independent of each
Tasks are defined but
Every members role is not all members
other
defined and understood understand them
by all.
2. Level of technical competence The team possesses the The team possesses The team lacks the The team does not have
and capability of the team vis- necessary technical the necessary technical technical capability to the technical capability to
-vis projects requirement capability to accomplish capability to accomplish accomplish the tasks and accomplish the tasks
(such as specialized the tasks the tasks, however, requires substantial
some additional study guidance by supervisor
knowledge or skill) or guidance may be and extensive study
needed
3. Availability of equipment All equipment required are Most of the equipment Most of the equipment All equipment required
required available in UTP are available in UTP required are NOT are NOT available in UTP
available in UTP
4. Opportunity to incorporate High opportunity Moderate opportunity Little opportunity No opportunity

creativity, innovativeness and
business acumen
Open
Criteria / Score 4 3 2 1 Score
5. Risk in operational safety (e.g. Minimal risk Low risk Moderate risk. May High risk. Only authorized
laser cutting) require trained personnel and trained personnel
(technicians) allowed to
operate / handle project
equipment or materials.
6. Project involves hazardous None at all A small amount of Moderate amount of Large amount of
materials (e.g. arsenic) hazardous material, hazardous material hazardous material
within the capability of
the labs at UTP
7. Time required for project Can be completed within Can be completed May face difficulties in Cannot be completed
completion 10 weeks, with some within 10 weeks, with completing within 10 within 10 weeks
buffer time no buffer time weeks
8. Project involves Involves more than 3 Involves 3 engineering Involves 2 engineering Involves only 1
multidisciplinary knowledge engineering fields which fields, which are fields, which are engineering field
and skills are adequately balanced adequately balanced adequately balanced
9. Project cost Estimated less than Estimated between Estimated between Estimated more than
RM200 RM200 RM250 RM250 RM300 RM300
Total Score
Total Score Indication

28 36 Project is highly feasible and suitable for ETP
19 27 Project is moderately feasible and suitable for ETP. Project requires review to improve on the criteria where the scores are low.
< 19 Project does not meet ETP expectations. It is strongly suggested to modify the topic or change to a more feasible topic.
Supervisors Signature: _______________________________

Name: _______________________________
Date: _______________________________

Open
APPENDIX III: PROJECT PROPOSAL SCORE SHEET FORM E1
MCB 3053 ENGINEERING TEAM PROJECT
Group No Name ID
Supervisor 1.
2.
3.
Title 4.
5.
6.
Marks
Breakdown Guidelines for Marking Marks
Allocated
- Background analysis
1 Introduction - Objective statement
30
- Problem definition
- Design approach / methodology
- Gantt Chart
2
- Task / work allocation
Project planning
- Project flow showing 30
involvement of all project
members
- Preliminary information
Data gathering and (Behaviour trend and analysis)
3 30
analysis - Documentation: references /
survey / site visit
- In-time submission
Compliance to
4 - Report complies to 10
requirement
requirement/format
TOTAL 100
Weightage in course: 10%
_________________________
Supervisors signature
Date: ____________________
Note: Supervisors shall forward the completed form (scanned copy) to ETP Coordinator by the deadline given.
Open
APPENDIX IV: PROGRESS REPORT SCORE SHEET FORM E2
Group No Name ID
Supervisor 1.
2.
3.
Title 4.
5.
6.
Marks
Allocated
- Project definition and problem
statement
1 Introduction - Identification of potential solutions
30
- Literature review
- Design concept
- Justification in choosing design
- Task listing and distribution
2 Project
- Logic of sequence of task 20
planning
- Feasibility of plan
- Identification of suitable tools or
3 Methodology 20
software
- Application of fundamental
Data gathering engineering knowledge in solving or
4
and analysis analysing design problem 20
- Validity & suitability of data
Economical / - Capital cost considerations
5 business - Operational cost considerations 5
consideration - Alternatives in materials
- Summary of progress and findings
6 Conclusion 5
- Next plan of action
TOTAL 100
_________________________
Date: ____________________

Open
APPENDIX V: FABRICATION SCORE SHEET FORM E3

Group No
Title
Group Leader ID
No. Component 4 3 2 1 Marks

Understanding of
scientific principles ALL members have clear Most members have Most members have
Most members DID NOT
1 and accurate clear and accurate relatively accurate
understand
underlying the understanding understanding understanding
fabrication/product
Proper planning. Improper planning. Improper planning.
Proper planning.
2 Fabrication Plan Follows plans accurately.
Sometimes able to follow Some flaws in the Major flaws in the
plan implementation of plan. implementation of plan.
Very neat Neat. Quite neat.
Clear dimensioning. Clear dimensioning. Clear dimensioning. No dimensioning. Poor
3 Drawings Major components Some components Some components labeling.
labeled. labeled. labeled.
Appropriate materials Materials were partly
Materials were selected Inappropriate materials
4 Materials were carefully selected
based on scientific facts.
selected based on
were selected.
based on scientific facts. scientific facts.
Great care taken. Fabricated as per the

Fabrication Slightly as per the Not fabricated as per the
5 Fabricated as per the construction drawing.
construction drawing. construction drawing.
Process construction drawing.
Clear evidence.
Sufficient evidence. Some evidence.
Testing & Data taken several times Data not taken in a
6 in a careful, reliable
Data taken twice in a Data taken once in a
reliable manner.
Measurements careful, reliable manner. careful, reliable manner.
manner.
Functions extraordinarily Functions pretty well, but

7 Functionality well.
Functions well.
with minor defects
Major flaws in function.
Neat assembly. Poor assembly

Excellent assembly. Neat assembly.
Poor cuttings. Poor cuttings.
8 Finishing Quality Cuttings are very neat. Cuttings are quite neat.
Satisfactory jointing. Poor jointing.
Excellent jointing. Proper jointing.
Structure of Excellently rigid structure. Satisfactorily rigid Marginally stable

9 structure structure
Unstable structure.
Prototype
Excellent geometry.
Attractive color and Poor overall look and
10 Aesthetics Attractive color and
overall look.
Proper color chosen.
color.
overall look.
Total (Max = 40)
Weightage: 10%
_________________________
Date: ____________________

Open
APPENDIX VI: POSTER EVALUATION SHEET FORM E4

Group No
Title
Group Leader ID
All images are in focus. Most images are in focus Most images are in focus Many images are not
1 Clarity of Images Identifiable 2m away. Identifiable 2m away Identifiable 1m away clear or are too small.
The graphics used reflect One or two of the The graphics are made No graphics made by the
Originality of an exceptional degree of graphics used reflect by the student, but are student are included.
2 student creativity. student creativity. based on the designs of
Graphics
others.
All graphics relevant. Most graphics relevant. Most graphics irrelevant. All graphics not relevant.
Relevance of
3 All borrowed graphics All borrowed graphics Most borrowed graphics Most borrowed graphics
Graphics
have a source citation. have a source citation. have a source citation. without a source citation.
Overall
Creatively composed.
4 Composition: Suitable choice of colors.
Creatively composed. Satisfactorily composed Messy and distracting
Figures, text, background.
Over 90% accurate Up to 70% accurate Up to 50% accurate Less than 50% accurate
Accuracy of
5
Content / Facts Citation provided Citation provided Citation provided Citation not provided
Introduction:
6 Problem statement, Clear & concise Satisfactory but lengthy Unclear No description at all
background & objective.
7 Methodology Clear & concise Satisfactory but lengthy Unclear No description at all
Results &
8 Clear & concise Satisfactory but lengthy Unclear No description at all
Conclusions
Business/Economic
9 Clear & concise Satisfactory but lengthy Unclear No description at all
Considerations
Suitable text sizes Suitable text sizes Unsuitable text sizes Unsuitable text sizes
10 Texts & Grammar
No grammatical errors Some grammatical errors Some grammatical errors Many grammatical errors
Total (Max = 40)
Weightage: 10%
________________________ ____________________
Examiners signature Name & Date

Open
APPENDIX VII: DEMONSTRATION OF WORKING PROTOTYPE/MODEL FORM E5

Group No
Title
THEME
Group Leader ID

High: Substantial: Operational:
Excellent new and New and practical idea Incremental Repeating ideas and
1 Level of Creativity practical idea that can that can bring benefits to Practical idea that can existing procedures with
bring extreme benefits to society bring benefits to society little team input into the
society ideas behind the project
Radical or Substantial: Incremental:
Breakthrough: The work is further The work is applied Data Gathering:
The work tackles a new applied research, research, looking at The work is purely
methodology to achieve tackling a new simple improvement of number-crunching, with
2 Level of Innovation the same function, and
could lead to a new
method/material to
achieve an existing an existing concept or little associated novelty
E.g. measurement of
avenue of research subfunction design stress in bicycle spokes
E.g. Using bioenergy of E.g. The fabrication of a E.g. Rear sensors on a during typical loading
human rider as power racing bicycle sub frame bicycle to warn riders of cycle during cycling.
source for bicycles using bamboo imminent collision
Completion of 90 99 % 80 89 %
3 100 % < 80%
prototype
Excellent geometry and Attractive color and Poor overall look and
Proper color chosen.
assembly. Attractive color overall look. Neat color. Poor assembly
Aesthetics & Neat assembly.
4 and overall look. Cuttings assembly. Cuttings are
Poor cuttings.
Poor cuttings.
Finishing quality are very neat. Excellent quite neat. Poor jointing.
Satisfactory jointing
jointing Proper jointing.
Structure of Satisfactorily rigid Marginally stable
5 Excellently rigid structure.
structure structure
Unstable structure.
Prototype
Appropriate materials Materials were partly
Materials were selected Inappropriate materials
6 Materials were carefully selected
based on scientific facts.
selected based on
were selected.
based on scientific facts. scientific facts.
Clear evidence.
Sufficient evidence. Some evidence.
Testing & Data taken several times Data not taken in a
7 in a careful, reliable
Data taken twice in a Data taken once in a
reliable manner.
Measurements careful, reliable manner. careful, reliable manner.
manner.
Understanding of
Members have
scientific principles Members understand Members have little Members generally DID
8 underlying the
completely clear and
most understanding NOT understand
accurate understanding
fabrication/product
Functionality Functions pretty well, but
Functions extraordinarily Functions well.
/Ability to with minor defects Major flaws in function.
9 well. 100% 90 99 %
implement the 80 89 % < 80% implementation
implementation implementation
implementation
desired task
10 Demonstration skill Highly convincing Quite convincing Quite dubious Highly dubious
Total (Max = 40)
Weightage: 20%
COMMERCIALIZATION VALUE: HIGH / MEDIUM / LOW
RECOMMENDED FOR SEDEX? YES / NO

Open
APPENDIX VIII: ORAL PRESENTATION GROUP ASSESSMENT FORM E6

Clarity of
1 Very clear Quite clear Quite vague Very vague
Presentation
Sequence & Time Logical sequence. Logical sequence.
Acceptable continuity Poor continuity.
2 Good continuity Acceptable continuity
Exceed the time limit. Exceed the time limit.
Limit Compliance to time limit. Exceed the time limit.
Composition of
3 Very Good Good Marginal Poor
Slides
Suitable
4 Visual Aids
Reasonable quality Reasonable quality Low quality
High quality
(drawings & illustrations) Adequate Adequate Inadequate Inadequate
Introduction
5 (Background, problem Very clear Quite clear Quite vague Very vague
statement and objective)
Literature Review / Highly adequate and

6 relevant
Adequate Marginal Poor
Data Gathering
Questionable design
Justified design selection No design selection
selection No design selection
7 Methodology Adequate engineering
Adequate engineering Some engineering analysis
Minimal engineering
analysis analysis
analysis
Poor work flow
Good work flow Reasonable work flow Quite poor work flow
Poor scheduling
8 Project Planning Good scheduling Proper scheduling Proper scheduling
Improper task
Proper task distribution Proper task distribution Proper task distribution
distribution
Prototype well tested.
Prototype tested. Prototype tested.
Results & Good discussions on results. Prototype not tested.
9 Business/Economic
Reasonable discussions Inadequate discussions on
Minimal discussions.
Discussions on results results
considerations
Conclusion &
10 Highly convincing Quite convincing Quite dubious Highly dubious
Recommendation
Weightage: 8% Total (Max = 40)
INDIVIDUAL PRESENTATION ASSESSMENT

Allocated
Marks
Breakdown Guidelines for Marking

ID:
ID:
ID:
ID:
ID:
ID:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
- Enthusiasm
1 Presentation skills
- Attire 10
- Language, Communication (Interactive)
Knowledge / - Able to show solid understanding of the project
2 10
understanding - Ability to respond to questions
TOTAL 20
Weightage: 2%
_______________________ ____________________
Examiners signature Name & Date

Open
APPENDIX IX: FINAL REPORT SCORE SHEET FORM E8
MCB3053 ENGINEERING TEAM PROJECT

Group No Name ID Prog.
Supervisor
Title
Marks
Allocated
1 Layout and - Summary
presentability - Table of contents 10
- Appendices (compilation of relevant
information)
2 Introduction - Background of project work
- Objective 20
- Problem definition and identification
- Literature review
3 Procedure and - Approach to solutions / methodology 20
analysis - Fundamental engineering analysis
4 Results - Technical specification and engineering
drawing
- Project output 40
- Discussion on result
- Conclusion
- Recommendations
Project - Progress monitoring (Gantt Chart) 10
5
management - Task allocation
TOTAL 100
/ 15
_________________________
Date: ____________________

Open
APPENDIX X: CALCULATION OF INDIVIDUAL CONTRIBUTION (IC) FORM E9
Group No
Supervisor
Title
N Week 2 Week 3 Week 4 Week 5 Week 6 Week 7 Week 8 Week 9 Week 10 Week 11 LB MP IC
Name ID
o 5% 5% (10%)
LB MP LB MP LB MP LB MP LB MP LB MP LB MP LB MP LB MP LB MP
1
Logbook marking guidelines (LB) Meeting & Participation marking guidelines (MP)
Criteria Score Criteria Score

Submit & Complete all tasks 0.9-1 Come on time & active 0.8-1
Submit & Complete most tasks 0.8-0.9 Come on time & less active 0.7-0.8
Submit & Complete few tasks 0.1-0.8 Late & active 0.5-0.7
No submission (w/o reason) 0 Late & less active 0.1-0.5
Absent (w/o reason) 0
______________________
Date: ____________________ Weightage: 10%
CALCULATION OF IC (EXAMPLE)
N Week 2 Week 3 Week 4 Week 5 Week 6 Week 7 Week 8 Week 9 Week 10 Week 11 LB MP IC
Name ID
o 5% 5% (10%)
LB MP LB MP LB MP LB MP LB MP LB MP LB MP LB MP LB MP LB MP
1 Ali 1234 0.9 0.7 0.8 0.8 0.9 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.9 0.9 0.8 0.9 0.9 0.8 0.9 0.9 0.8 0,8 0.9 0.8 4.3 4.1 8.4

Open
APPENDIX XI: RESULT COMPILATION FORM E10
Group No
Supervisor
Title
SUPERVISOR OTHER EXAMINERS

Student Proj. Prog. Final Subtotal Grp Subtotal Peer
No ID Name Prog. Prop. Rpt. Fab. Rpt IC 1 Poster Demo Oral 2 Eval Total
10% 10% 10% 15% 10% 55% 15% 10% 10% 40% 5% 100%
1
2
3
4
5
6
ASSESSMENT FOR EACH STUDENT (EXAMPLE)
SUPERVISOR OTHER EXAMINERS

Proj. Prog. Final Subtotal Grp Subtotal
No ID Student Name Prog. Prop. Rpt. Fab. Rpt IC 1 Poster Demo Oral 2 Total
10% 10% 10% 15% 10% 55% 10% 20% 10% 40% 100%
1 XXXX STUDENT 1 CH 8 7.9 8.1 12 9 45 8 15 9.0 32 77
2 XXXX STUDENT 2 CH 8 7.9 8.1 12 8.7 44.7 8 15 9.0 32 76.7
3 XXXX STUDENT 3 CV 8 7.9 8.1 12 7.9 43.9 8 15 9.0 32 75.9
4 XXXX STUDENT 4 EE 8 7.9 8.1 12 9 45 8 15 9.0 32 77
5 XXXX STUDENT 5 ME 8 7.9 8.1 12 8 44 8 15 9.0 32 76

Open
APPENDIX XII: LOGBOOK SUMMARY FORM E11
Group No Week No
Supervisor
Title
Student Name ID
Completed Activities (from last week)
Planned Activities (for next week)
Overall group progress vs. Gantt Chart:
Problems encountered:
Note: 1) Maximum 2 pages only

2) Supervisor needs to verify each students activities during the weekly meeting.
_______________________
Date: ____________________
Note: Supervisors shall retain the forms for two consecutive years.

Open
APPENDIX XIII: PROJECT PROPOSAL CONTENT
The project proposal must have the followings at minimum:
Details of the Project Team (front page)
Group Number
Project:
Matric Number
Team Leader
Member
Member

Approved for submission: (signature)

Group Supervisor Name,
Date
Short Summary/Abstract
Problem Statement
Project Objectives
Background Study
Design Approach/Methodology
Procedures
Plan and Schematic Flow Process of the Project
Hardware/Tools and Software
Project Management
Task Allocation and Activities
Schedule/Gantt Chart

Open
APPENDIX XIV: SAMPLE OF REFERENCING FORMAT
The format of references for the respective sources is as follows:
1. journal refer to Meguid and Zhu (1995)

2. book refer to Glister P. (1993)
3. book in series refer to Ochoa, O.O and Reddy, J.N. (1989)
4. article in book/conference proceedings refer to Eskey, D and Grabe, W. (1988)
5. thesis refer to Mohd Shariff, A. (1995)
6. interview refer to Hamouda, A.M.S. (1994)
7. website refer to Duncan, Donna. (1998)
Meguid, S.A. and Zhu, Z.H., 1995, "A novel finite element for treating inhomogeneous solids,"
International Journal Numerical Methods Engineering 38 (2): 1579-1592
Glister P. 1993, The Internet Navigator, New York, John Wiley & Sons
Eskey, D and Grabe, W. 1988, "Interactive models for second language reading" in
P. Carrell, J. Devine and D. Eskey (Eds) Interactive approaches to Second Language Reading ,
Cambridge; Cambridge University Press
Hitam, P., 1995, Fundamental Study of X-111 Soil Characteristics, Ph.D. Thesis, Universiti Teknologi
PETRONAS, Malaysia.
Hamouda, A.M.S. 1994. LUSAS Ltd., UK, Private communication.
Websites (with author):

Author, Year, Title, Date accessed, from URL
Duncan, D. M., 2008, How to Eat Humble Pie, 6 Sept 2009, from http://www.geovillage.com
Websites (without author):

Title, Year, Date accessed, from URL

Open
APPENDIX XV: SAMPLE OF COVER PAGE FOR FINAL REPORT
ENGINEERING TEAM PROJECT
TITLE OF PROJECT
BY
GROUP NUMBER
Member 1 ( Matric Number)

Supervisor:
January 2030
Universiti Teknologi Petronas

Bandar Seri Iskandar
31750 Tronoh,
Perak Darul Ridzuan
Open
APPENDIX XVI: STUDENTS REQUISITION FORM FORM 03
Student's Name Student's ID

E-mail Address Contact No
ETP Group No Date
Project Title
Note: The cost of preparing project reports and posters including photocopying and stationeries are to be borne by the students
themselves.
Dimension (L X W X H)/ Unit
Vendor / Amount
No. Item Brand & Model description / material / Price Qty
supplier (RM)
specification (RM)
Total
Verified by: Certified by: Endorsed by: Approved by:

(Lab Executive) (Project Supervisor) (ETP Coordinator) (Programme Head)
Signature
Official
Stamp
Date

Open
APPENDIX XVII: STUDENTS REQUISITION FORM - SAMPLE FORM 03
Student's Name Suhana Bt Ramli Student's ID 12345

E-mail Address Suhana_ramli@utp.edu.my Contact No 012-345 6789
ETP Group No 91 Date 14 Feb 2008
Project Title Electron X provide brief description
Note: The cost of preparing project reports and posters including photocopying and stationeries are to be borne by the students
themselves.
Dimension (L X W X H)/ Unit
Vendor / Amount
No. Item Brand & Model description / material / Price Qty
supplier (RM)
specification (RM)
1 Photovoltaic module Kyocera 120 X 10 X 10 mm / 250W Sunny Boy 88.90 1 88.90
2 Inductor Sumida CDH53 68 uH 1.5Arms 0.18DCR Xcel Circuit 63.50 1 63.50
3 Padding N/A 50 X 11 X 6 mm / rubber Eng Huat 5.00 6 30.00
4 Dividers N/A 3" X 6" sheet metal / steel Eng Huat 8.50 3 25.50
5 Spray paint Net Paint 1 liter / Oil-based paint Eng Huat 10.00 2 20.00
6 Galvanised washers N/A 3/8" / steel Eng Huat 3.50 4 14.00
7 Ply wood N/A 100 X 80 X 6 mm / wood Eng Huat 12.80 1 12.80
8 Hinges N/A 30 X 90 mm / brass Eng Huat 2.00 2 4.00
Total 258.70
Verified by: Certified by: Endorsed by: Approved by:

(Lab Executive) (Project Supervisor) (ETP Coordinator) (Programme Head)
Signature
Official
Stamp
Date

Open
APPENDIX XVIII: JUSTIFICATION LETTER
MBB3013 ENGINEERING TEAM PROJECT
To : AP Ir Dr Masri bin Baharom

Head, Department of Mechanical Engineering
From :
ETP Group No Contact :
CC (Supervisor) : Date :
Dear Sir,
RE: JUSTIFICATION FOR PURCHASE EXCEEDING ETP BUDGET
Referring to the above, we wish to request your approval to allow purchases more than RM200 for our ETP project. The table
below shows the list of items to be purchased, in descending order of price and corresponding justifications or supporting remarks.
Is there any
Price cheaper
No Item Supplier Justifications / supporting remarks
(RM) alternative
source?
Total
Thank you for your consideration.
Yours sincerely, Endorsed by (Supervisor):
________________ ________________
Decision: tick ( )
Approved Not Approved

Sign: __________________________ Date: __________________________
Remarks (if any): ______________________________________________________________________________

Open
APPENDIX XIX: JUSTIFICATION LETTER - SAMPLE
MAB/MBB 3013 ENGINEERING TEAM PROJECT
To : Dr. Masri B Baharom

Head, Department of Mechanical Engineering
From : Suhana Bt Ramli
ETP Group No 88 Contact : 012 345 6789
CC (Supervisor) : Dr Mohd Jefri Date : 14 Feb 2008
Dear Sir,
RE: JUSTIFICATION FOR PURCHASE EXCEEDING ETP BUDGET
Referring to the above, we wish to request your approval to allow purchases more than RM200 for our ETP project. The table
below shows the list of items to be purchased, in descending order of price and corresponding justifications or supporting remarks.
Is there any
Price cheaper
No Item Supplier Justifications / supporting remarks
(RM) alternative
source?
1 Photovoltaic Sunny There is only one sole supplier (Sunny Boy) in
88.90 No
module Boy Malaysia.
2 Three quotations were obtained (RM77.50,
Xcel
Inductor 63.50 No RM72.00 and RM63.50) and Xcel Circuit provided
Circuit
the lowest price based on the same specification.
3 Padding 30.00
4 Dividers 25.50 For Items #3 - #8, Eng Huat is selected as the
5 Spray paint 20.00 location is near UTP, it has a complete range of
6 Galvanised Eng Huat products meeting the specifications, hence is
14.00 convenient and helps reduce traveling time and
washers
7 Ply wood 12.80 cost.
8 Hinges 4.00
Total 258.70
Thank you for your consideration.
Yours sincerely, Endorsed by (Supervisor):
___(Signature)_____________ ___(Signature)_____________
Decision: tick ()
Approved Not Approved
Sign: __________________________ Date: __________________________
Remarks (if any): ______________________________________________________________________________

Open
APPENDIX XX: ETP CLAIM BREAKDOWN FORM
MAB/MBB 3013 ENGINEERING TEAM PROJECT
PREPARED BY
Student's Name Student's ID
E-mail Address Contact No

ETP Group No Date
Project Title (Refer Finance Reference from UTP Claim Form)
Please attach the completely endorsed Form UTP 03 and all the receipts.
Please use additional pages if necessary.
Dimension (L x W x H)/ description / material /

No. Item Receipt No. Qty Amount
specification
Total
Prepared by,
___________________________

Open
APPENDIX XXI: PEER EVALUATION TEMPLATE
Peer Evaluation : Engineering Team Project ETP GRP:
Student to be evaluated
Name: ID:
CATEGORY 4 3 2 1 Score
Contributions Routinely provides Usually provides useful Sometimes provides Rarely provides useful
useful ideas when ideas when participating in useful ideas when ideas when participating
participating in the group the group work and participating in group in group work and
work and discussion. A discussion. A strong group work and discussion. A discussion. May refuse
definite leader or member who tries hard! satisfactory group to participate.
member who contributes member who does what
a lot of effort. is required.
Quality of Provides work of the Provides high quality Provides work that Provides work that
Work highest quality. work. occasionally needs to usually needs to be
be checked/redone by checked/redone by
other group members to others to ensure quality.
ensure quality.
Time- Routinely uses time well Usually uses time well Tends to procrastinate, Rarely gets things done
management throughout the project to throughout the project, but but always gets things by the deadlines AND
ensure things get done may have procrastinated done by the deadlines. group has to adjust
on time. Group does not on one thing. Group does Group does not have to deadlines or work
have to adjust deadlines not have to adjust adjust deadlines or responsibilities because
or work responsibilities deadlines or work work responsibilities of this person's
because of this person's responsibilities because of because of this inadequate time
procrastination. this person's person's management.
procrastination. procrastination.
Problem- Actively looks for and Refines solutions Does not suggest or Does not try to solve
solving suggests solutions to suggested by others. refine solutions, but is problems or help others
problems. willing to try out solve problems. Let
solutions suggested by others do the work.
others.
Attitude Always has a positive Often has a positive Usually has a positive Often has a negative
attitude about the attitude about the task(s). attitude about the attitude about the
task(s). Never is publicly Rarely is publicly critical of task(s). Occasionally is task(s). Often is publicly
critical of the project or the project or the work of publicly critical of the critical of the project or
the work of others. others. project or the work of the work of other
other members of the members of the group.
group.
Reliability Consistently stays Focuses on the task and Focuses on the task Rarely focuses on the
focused on the task and what needs to be done and what needs to be task and what needs to
what needs to be done. most of the time. Other done some of the time. be done. Lets others do
Very self-directed. group members can count Other group members the work.
on this person. must sometimes nag,
prod, and remind to
keep this person on-
task.
TOTAL
Adapted from: http://coe.nevada.edu/slefevre/grouprubric.html

Open

Etp Guideline (May 2017) PDF

Caricato da

Informazioni sul documento

Titolo originale

Copyright

Formati disponibili

Condividi questo documento

Condividi o incorpora il documento

Opzioni di condivisione

Hai trovato utile questo documento?

Questo contenuto è inappropriato?

Copyright:

Formati disponibili

Etp Guideline (May 2017) PDF

Caricato da

Copyright:

Formati disponibili

ENGINEERING TEAM PROJECT (MDB 3053)

2. OBJECTIVES AND LEARNING OUTCOMES . . . 4

4. SUMMARY OF PROJECT WORK . . . . . 5

4.1 Project Proposal . . . . . . 5

4.2 Progress Report . . . . . . 6

4.3 Development of Prototype / Model . . . . 6

4.4 Poster Presentation . . . . . . 6

4.5 Demonstration of Working Prototype / Model . . . 6

4.6 Engineering Design Exhibition (SEDEX) . . 7

4.7 Oral Presentation . . . . . . 7

4.8 Final Report . . . . . . . 7

8. ATTENDANCE AND MEETINGS . . . . . 9

10. PROJECT EXPENDITURE . . . . . 9

13. WRITING FORMAT FOR FINAL REPORT . . . 13

Engineering Team Project (ETP): May 2017 Semester Page 2

APPENDIX II PROJECT ASSESSMENT RUBRIC....................................................19

APPENDIX III PROJECT PROPOSAL SCORE SHEET ............................................ 21

APPENDIX IV PROGRESS REPORT SCORE SHEET .............................................. 22

APPENDIX V FABRICATION SCORE SHEET ......................................................... 23

APPENDIX VI POSTER EVALUATION SHEET ........................................................ 24

APPENDIX VII DEMO. OF WORKING PROTOTYPE/MODEL ............................... 25

APPENDIX VIII ORAL PRESENTATION: GROUP ASSESSMENT ......................... 26

APPENDIX IX FINAL REPORT SCORE SHEET ....................................................... 27

APPENDIX X CALCULATION OF INDIVIDUAL CONTRIBUTION (IC)............ 28

APPENDIX XII LOGBOOK SUMMARY ....................................................................... 30

APPENDIX XIII PROJECT PROPOSAL CONTENT .................................................... 31

APPENDIX XIV SAMPLE OF REFERENCING FORMAT .......................................... 32

APPENDIX XV SAMPLE OF COVER PAGE FOR FINAL REPORT ....................... 33

APPENDIX XVI STUDENTS REQUISITION FORM. .................................................. 34

APPENDIX XVII STUDENTS REQUISITION FORM SAMPLE .............................. 35

APPENDIX XVIII JUSTIFICATION LETTER .................................................................. 36

APPENDIX XIX JUSTIFICATION LETTER SAMPLE ............................................. 37

APPENDIX XX ETP CLAIM BREAKDOWN FORM ................................................... 38

APPENDIX XXI PEER EVALUATION TEMPLATE ................................................... 39

Engineering Team Project (ETP): May 2017 Semester Page 3

2. OBJECTIVES AND LEARNING OUTCOMES

To inculcate teamwork spirit.

1. Apply engineering knowledge and solve engineering design problem.

Engineering Team Project (ETP): May 2017 Semester Page 4

The scope of the project includes:

To generate conceptual designs

4. SUMMARY OF PROJECT WORK

Please refer to Appendix I for the schedule of the present semester.

4.1 Project Proposal

Engineering Team Project (ETP): May 2017 Semester Page 5

4.3 Development of Prototype / Model

4.4 Poster Presentation

4.5 Demonstration / Simulation of Working Prototype/Model

Engineering Team Project (ETP): May 2017 Semester Page 6

4.7 Oral Presentation

4.8 Final Report

Engineering Team Project (ETP): May 2017 Semester Page 7

1. Dr Hilmi Hussin (05 368 7027, hilmi_hussin@utp.edu.my)

The responsibilities of the Coordinators can be summarised as follows:

Managing and implementing the ETP course.

6.2 Supervisor 2 or Co-Supervisor

A Supervisor 2 may be nominated to assist in the supervision of a team. The responsibilities

Where applicable, guiding students or providing support in any specific areas

Engineering Team Project (ETP): May 2017 Semester Page 8

8. ATTENDANCE AND MEETINGS

Students are required to conduct meetings regularly among themselves on project

10. PROJECT EXPENDITURE

Engineering Team Project (ETP): May 2017 Semester Page 9

ETP Group: _ Project Title: _