Methodology:

Quantitative research method is used in this study. And for the collection of data
questionnaire is used as instrument and scale used is strongly agree to strongly
disagree. To compute the data inferential analysis is used. The population size is 100 and
the entire respondent will be the employees of private and government educational
sectors. And research site is Punjab University, Superior University, and Educators
School. The nature of the study will be cross sectional. And more than 2 variables will be
used in this study. The questionnaire is valid and reliable because it is taken from the
site and is used before in many researches.
Analysis and result:

In this research for summarizing data descriptive analysis is used and inferential analysis
is used to find the relationship and strength between the variables. For the analysis of
data SPSS is used in addition to other suitable statistical techniques. Because it transfer
the data in the simple manner so that the researcher can easily conclude that
information provided by the selected respondents.

Frequency Table for Gender

Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent

Valid female 19 19.0 19.0 19.0

Male 81 81.0 81.0 100.0

Total 100 100.0 100.0

 Bar Chart for Gender

The above frequency table and bar chart shows the number of participants with respect
of their gender. In the frequency table, 19 participants are female and 81 are male.
Third column of valid percent shows that 19% of female and 81% of male.

Frequency Table for job level

Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent

Valid lower level 31 31.0 31.0 31.0

middle level 53 53.0 53.0 84.0

top level 16 16.0 16.0 100.0

Total 100 100.0 100.0

 Bar chart for job level

In the above frequency table that shows the number of participants with respect of
their job level. In the frequency table, 31 participants belong to lower level of job, 53
participants belong to middle level of job and remaining 16 participants belong to top
level of job. in the column of valid percent shows that 31% of middle level job, 53% of
lower level job and 16% of top level job.
Correlations

Training opportunity and employee retention

In the above scatter plot where we find the difference of quadratic and linear line which
helps us to know either it is linear relationship between training opportunity and
employee retention or not. If the difference is greater than 0.05, means there is no
linear relationship between them then spearman correlation applies otherwise Pearson
correlation. In our analysis, the difference is 0.024 so we apply the Pearson correlation.
 Correlations

Employee training
retention opportunity

Employee retention Pearson Correlation 1 .386**

Sig. (2-tailed) .000

N 100 100

training opportunity Pearson Correlation .386** 1

Sig. (2-tailed) .000

N 100 100

In the above table of correlation sig. value is 0.000, it means null hypothesis is rejected,
there is some relationship between training opportunity and employee retention.
Pearson correlation value is .386 which means the relationship is moderate because the
Spearman correlation value is in between 0.33 and 0.66.

Work place environment and employee retention

In the above scatter plot where we find the difference of quadratic and linear line which
helps us to know either it is linear relationship between workplace environment and
employee retention or not. In our analysis, the difference is .169 it means there is no
linear relationship between them so we apply the spearman correlation.

Correlations

Employee work place

retention environment

Spearman's rho Employee retention Correlation Coefficient 1.000 .578**

Sig. (2-tailed) . .000

N 100 100

work place environment Correlation Coefficient .578** 1.000

Sig. (2-tailed) .000 .

N 100 100

**. Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed).

In the above table of correlation sig. value is 0.000, it means null hypothesis is rejected,
there is some relationship between work place environment and employee retention.
The positive sign of the Spearmans test value shows that there is positive relationship
which means that if the work place environment is better in life then employee
retention is also increase in the employees mind. Spearman correlation value is .578
which means the relationship is moderate because the Spearman correlation value is in
between 0.33 and 0.66.
Participation of employees and employee retention

In the above scatter plot where we find the difference of quadratic and linear line which
helps us to know either it is linear relationship between participation of employees and
employee retention or not. The difference is 0.028 so we apply the Pearson correlation.

Correlations

Employee participation of
retention employee

Employee retention Pearson Correlation 1 .893**

Sig. (2-tailed) .000

N 100 100

participation of employee Pearson Correlation .893** 1

Sig. (2-tailed) .000

N 100 100

**. Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed).

In the above table of correlation sig. value is 0.000, it means null hypothesis is rejected,
and there is some relationship between participation of employee and employee
retention. Pearson correlation value is .893 which means the relationship is strong
because the Spearman correlation value is high then 0.66.

Reward and employee retention

In the above scatter plot where we find the difference of quadratic and linear line which
helps us to know either it is linear relationship between Reward and employee retention
or not. In our analysis, the difference is 0.061 it means there is no linear relationship
between them so we apply the spearman correlation.
 Correlations

Employee
retention Reward

Spearman's rho Employee retention Correlation Coefficient 1.000 .794**

Sig. (2-tailed) . .000

N 100 100

Reward Correlation Coefficient .794** 1.000

Sig. (2-tailed) .000 .

N 100 100

**. Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed).

In the above table of correlation sig. value is 0.000, it means null hypothesis is rejected,
there is some relationship between reward and employee retention. The positive sign of
the Spearmans test value shows that there is positive relationship which means that if
the reward is increase then employee retention is also increase in the employees mind.
Spearman correlation value is .794 which means the relationship is strong because the
Spearman correlation value is greater than 0.66.
Employee satisfaction and employee retention
In the above scatter plot where we find the difference of quadratic and linear line which
helps us to know either it is linear relationship between employee satisfaction and
employee retention or not. The difference is 0.037 so we apply the Pearson correlation.

Correlations

Employee Employee
retention Satisfaction

Employee retention Pearson Correlation 1 .374**

Sig. (2-tailed) .000

N 100 100

Employee Satisfaction Pearson Correlation .374** 1

Sig. (2-tailed) .000

N 100 100

**. Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed).

In the above table of correlation sig. value is 0.000, it means null hypothesis is rejected,
there is some relationship between employee satisfaction and employee retention.
Pearson correlation value is .374 which means the relationship is moderate because the
Spearman correlation value is between 0.33 and 0.66.

Regressions
Through regression we can predict that how much influence on dependant variable
(response) due to how much change in independent variable (predictor).

1. Regression of Employee retention (dependant) and Training opportunity

(independent)

Model Summary

Adjusted R Std. Error of the

Model R R Square Square Estimate

1 .386a .149 .140 1.37007

 Model Summary

Adjusted R Std. Error of the

Model R R Square Square Estimate

1 .386a .149 .140 1.37007

a. Predictors: (Constant), training opportunity

Coefficientsa

Standardized
Unstandardized Coefficients Coefficients

Model B Std. Error Beta T Sig.

1 (Constant) 3.681 1.093 3.367 .001

training opportunity .653 .158 .386 4.139 .000

a. Dependent Variable: Employee retention

The significant value is 0.000 it means null hypothesis is rejected. It shows that there is
relationship between these variables. In the model summary table the adjusted R
square value is 14.0 %. It shows that Training Opportunity bring change by 14.9 % in on
Employee retention.

Regression equation : Y = 3.681 + .653X

2:Regression of Employee retention (dependant),Workplace environment

(independent)

Model Summary

Adjusted R Std. Error of the

Model R R Square Square Estimate

1 .623a .388 .382 1.16127

a. Predictors: (Constant), work place environment

 Coefficientsa

Standardized
Unstandardized Coefficients Coefficients

Model B Std. Error Beta T Sig.

1 (Constant) 3.773 .569 6.630 .000

work place environment .361 .046 .623 7.890 .000

a. Dependent Variable: Employee retention

The significant value is 0.000 it means null hypothesis is rejected. It shows that there is
relationship between these variables. In the model summary table to determine that
Workplace environment influences on Employee retention. And adjusted R square value
is 38.2 %. It means Workplace environment bring change by 38.8 % in on Employee
retention.

Regression equation : Y = 3.773 + .361X

3: Regression of Employee retention (dependant) and Employee participation

(independent)

Model Summary

Adjusted R Std. Error of the

Model R R Square Square Estimate

1 .893a .798 .796 .66735

a. Predictors: (Constant), participation of employee

Coefficientsa

Standardized
Model Unstandardized Coefficients Coefficients t Sig.
 B Std. Error Beta

1 (Constant) -3.900 .617 -6.321 .000

participation of employee 1.255 .064 .893 19.679 .000

a. Dependent Variable: Employee retention

The significant value is 0.000 it means null hypothesis is rejected. It shows that there is
relationship between these variables.

In the model summary table we can determine that how much participation of
employee influences on Employee retention. In the model summary table the adjusted
R square value is 79.6 %. It means participation of employee bring change by 89.3 % on
Employee retention.

Regression equation : Y = -3.900+ 1.255X

4: regression of Employee retention (dependant) and Reward (independent)

Model Summary

Adjusted R Std. Error of the

Model R R Square Square Estimate

1 .875a .765 .763 .71954

a. Predictors: (Constant), reward

Coefficientsa

Standardized
Unstandardized Coefficients Coefficients

Model B Std. Error Beta t Sig.

1 (Constant) 2.047 .350 5.847 .000

 Reward .382 .021 .875 17.872 .000

a. Dependent Variable: Employee retention

The significant value is 0.000 it means null hypothesis is rejected. It shows that there is
relationship between these variables

Model summary table shows that how much Reward influences on Employee retention.
In the model summary table the adjusted R square value is 76.3 %. It means Reward
bring change by 76.5 % on Employee retention.

Regression equation : Y = 2.047+ .382X

Multi regression

It predicts the influence of two or more independent variables on one dependent

variable.

Variables are Employees retention (dependant), Reward (independent), Training

opportunities (independent), Participation of employees (independent), Employee
satisfaction (independent).

Model Summary

Adjusted R Std. Error of the

Model R R Square Square Estimate

1 .956a .914 .910 .44276

a. Predictors: (Constant), participation of employee, training

opportunity, Employee Satisfaction, reward

Coefficientsa

Standardized
Unstandardized Coefficients Coefficients

Model B Std. Error Beta T Sig.

 (Constant) -10.754 2.639 -4.075 .000

Reward -.435 .168 -.995 -2.587 .011

training opportunity .103 .062 .061 1.675 .047

Employee Satisfaction -.258 .033 -.385 -7.724 .000

participation of employee 2.995 .516 2.132 5.805 .000

a. Dependent Variable: Employee retention

In the above coefficient table we can see that all these variables are below the
significant level so that all these independent variables are rejecting null hypothesis.
And all these independent variables (reward, training opportunity, employees
satisfaction, participation of employees) have 91.4 % influences on employee retention.

Excluded Variablesb

Collinearity
Statistics
Partial
Model Beta In t Sig. Correlation Tolerance

1 work place environment .a . . . .000

a. Predictors in the Model: (Constant), participation of employee, training opportunity, Employee Satisfaction,
reward

b. Dependent Variable: Employee retention

Workplace environment independently has influence on the employee retention but

with the combination of all the independent variables it does not show the affect. So it
is placed in the single table called Excluded variable.