Sei sulla pagina 1di 9

Nigerian Journal of Microbiology, 2009, Vol.

, 23(1);1830 - 1838

Assessment of Physicochemical and Biological Indices of Fluvial Deposits in Abandoned Mine


Pits in Ishiagu, South Eastern Nigeria

*Nwaugo, V.O.1, 2Onwuchekwa.I.S., 3Ogbonna, C. and 1Onyeagba, R.A


1
Environmental Microbiology Unit, Abia State University, Uturu
2
Hydrology and hydrobiology Unit, Abia State Univeristy, Uturu
3
Environmental Resources Management, Abia State University, Uturu
Abstract
The physicochemical and microbiological indices of heavy metal mine pit soil
were assessed using standard methods. PO4, SO4, NO3 and TOC were higher in alluvial
deposits of abandoned mine pits than active mine pit soil and control soil. Soil from the
alluvial deposits had high silts and clay contents while active pit soil had more sand particles.
Pb and Zn concentrations were statistically (P=0.05) higher in the active pit soil and above
the acceptable limits in all soil samples. Cd, Cu, and Fe were within acceptable levels. Total
heterotrophic, cellulolytic, nitrifying and phosphate solubilizing bacterial counts were higher
in the abandoned mine alluvial deposits. Iron oxidizing and sulphur oxidizing bacterial counts
were higher in the acidic active mine soil but sulphur reducing bacteria were more prevalent
in the neutral alluvial deposit soils of the abandoned pits. Most adversely affected bacterial
group was the nitrifying group, and the least was the total heterotrophic bacterial group.. All
soil enzymes whose activities were determined followed the trend of microbial loads ie
showing more activities in mine alluvial soil than the active mine pit soil. These enzymes
were dehydrogenase, which was the most adversely affected, urease, glucosidase, acid and
alkaline phosphatase.

Keywords; mine tailing, properties, bacteria, metals, adverse.


Corresponding author: Dr. V.O. Nwaugo
E-mail: vonwaugo@yahoo.com Tel; 2348063493654

Introduction cases, such soils contain silt and clay


The soil is very important to human particles with less of sand and high
existence for various reasons especially organic matter content (Prescott et al
agriculture. However, the soil has been ,2003).
subjected to several abuses including The complex geochemical nature of
dumping of wastes and other the environment portrays equally
contaminating activities (Weillinga et al, complex microbial flora. In the same
1999, Nwaugo et al, 2006, 2007a). The vein microorganisms mediating the
soil also contains several minerals and biogeochemical transformations
metals, which are only mined either by involving recycling of nutrients and
drilling or excavation. The excavation energy, are also complex. Lee et al
leaves large ditches and ponds on its (2002). Aon and Colaroneri (2001), and
trail. When these ditches are water or Pascual et al., (2000) agreed that the
sand filled, they serve other purposes for complexity of the microbial population
man (Nwaugo et al, 2006). According to gives rise to a complex array of enzymes
Weillinga et al., (1999) and Cloassens et catalyzing different transformation
al., (2005), alluvial deposits of most processes in alluvial soil of mine pits.
mine pits contain soil slightly different Generally, this type of alluvial soil
from the surroundings, as it contains litter all excavated mine areas in
mainly washed down particles. In most Nigeria, especially in the rural areas.

1830
Nwaugo et al., 2009 Nig.J.Microbiol., 23(1);1830 - 1838

The quality of and microbial activities in were determined by the methods stated
such soil remains largely unexplained in in UNEP(2004) analytical methods. The
Nigeria. Such heavy metal mining organic carbon content was determined
activities (excavation) have been on for by the loss of ignition method using
several years (over thirty-five years) MAC 2000 furnace while the moisture
unabated in Ishiagu, South eastern, content was determined gravimetrically
Nigeria, This study was therefore after drying at 105oC till constant weight
designed to investigate the was obtained. The heavy metal contents
physicochemical properties of the of the various soil samples were
alluvial deposits in abandoned and determined using HACH/DO/2010
active Pb and Zn mine pits including the Atomic Absorption spectrophotometer
microbial profile and enzymatic after digestion.
activities in Ishiagu. This will ascertain Microbial diversity
the suitability of such soil for The diluted (ten-fold serial dilution)
agricultural purposes. samples were spread plated on various
Materials and methods specific culture media for the desired
The study area is Ishiagu, a rural bacterial group and incubated
Pb/Zn mining community of Ebonyi appropriately for 24-72 hours. The
State, South Eastern Nigeria. It is bacterial groups and the media used
located between latitudes 7o30’ and include phosphate solubilizing bacteria
7o37’E and longitudes 5o52’ and 6o00’ (PSB) with phosphate solubilizing
N(Fig. 1). The study area lies in the bacteria medium (US patent, 2003),
typical Guinea Savanna area of Nigeria nitrifying bacteria (NB) with modified
characterized by tall grasses and a few mineral salt agar and cellulose Agar for
trees with a mean annual rainfall cellulolytic bacteria (CB). Postgate
between 1750 – 2000mm. The people medium (modified) was used for
are mainly farmers. sulphate reducing bacteria. Sulphur
Sampling oxidizing bacteria and iron oxidizing
Four of the abandoned pit alluvial bacteria were cultured as described by
soil and two recent/active mining pits Harrison (1984). Sulphate oxidizing
located in the same area were randomly bacteria was estimated using
sampled. The control was taken from Thiosulphate medium B as described by
another unexcavated natural area, a good Chessbrough (2003)
distance(500m) away from the mining Soil enzymatic activities
sties. At each sampling site, three The activities of five enzymes
samples collected according to Dick et were evaluated. These include
al., (1990), were pooled to give one dehydrogenase produced by all
main sample. While microbiological and microorganisms and indirectly related to
enzymatic activities were analyzed organic carbon content, urease,
within 2 - 3 hours of collection, the phosphatases (acid and alkaline)
samples for physicochemical parameters important in nitrogen and phosphorus
were stored at 40C until required for recycling respectively. The activities of
analysis within 1-3 days of collection. glucosidase known to influence carbon
Physicochemical parameters utilization was also assessed.
The pH and temperature were Dehydrogenase was analyzed
determined using Jenway Multipurpose according to Li et al., (2005) involving
Tester (HANNA 1910 model). The the use of triphenyl tetrazolum chloride
phosphate (PO4), and Sulphate (SO4) (TTC) amended soil with formation of

1831
Nwaugo et al., 2009 Nig.J.Microbiol., 23(1);1830 - 1838

triphenyl formazon (TPF) read at according to Tabatabai (1997) at pH of


485nM. Urease activity was determined 11 and 5.5 respectively using p-
colorimetrically as described by nitrophenyl phosphate as substrate and
Kandeler and Gerder (1988) with urea formation of p-nitrophenol. Glucosidase
amended soil. Alkaline and acid activity was estimated as described by
phosphatases were investigated Eivazi and Tabatabai (1988).

1832
Nwaugo et al, 2009 Nig.J.Microbiol., 23(1);1830 - 1838

Results Zn) on all the bacterial groups determined as soil


Physicochemical parameters with high metallic concentrations had low
Results obtained in the various alluvial soil microbial counts and vice versa (Table 2).
samples had similar values but different from Analysis of the bacterial groups showed that the
those from active mining pit soil. Values from the nitrifying, cellulolytic and phosphate solubilizling
control were found to be close to those from the bacteria were not significantly different in
alluvial soil in the abandoned pits. prevalence in the various soil samples.
Table 1 shows the physicochemical parameters Again,values ofs total heterotrophic bacteria were
of the soil samples analyzed. Abandoned pit also significantly higher than the values of the
alluvial soil had pH values 6.96 – 7.14 while the other groups of bacteria determined (Table 2).
active pits had 5.5 – 5.7 and control 6.52. The Soil enzymatic activities
values range of PO4 was 5.82 – 6.0mg/g, 2.24 – Soil enzymatic activities were observed to
2.48mg/g and 4.91mg/g for pit alluvial soil, active follow the pattern of total heterotrophic bacteria.
pit soil and control soil respectively. This same The highest activities were in the alluvial soil of
trend was also observed in SO4, NO3, TOC and the abandoned pits, followed by the control soil
moisture content (Table 1) respectively. before the active mining pit soil (Table 3).
Values obtained for Cu, Cd and Fe were low and The most adversely affected enzyme was
non-significant (P = 0.05). On the other dehydrogenase which had 7.82 – 8.31 mg/g-16h-1
hand,values for Pb and Zn were significantly (P = in abandoned pit alluvial soil and only 0.59 – 0.92
0.05) high and exceeded the safety levels as mg/g-16h-1 in the active mining pit soil (only
directed by CEC (1986). This was especially so in 11.07% of the highest activity). Urease had 4.25 –
the active pit soils while the abandoned alluvial 1.03 mg/gh-3-1 activities with lowest value in the
pit soils were within the upper acceptable limits active pit soil and highest in the alluvial soil. The
(Table 1). active mine soil had only 25.85 – 24.21% of the
Microbial diversity highest activities in the abandoned pit alluvial
All bacterial groups determined were present in soil.
all soil samples analyzed but at different rates. The phosphatases – acid and alkaline did
Similar trends were observed in all the groups not show as much differences in activities as the
except the SRB and IOB which were highest in other enzymes. The difference between the
the active pit soil. In all the other bacterial groups, highest values (2.27 µ-mol-p-nitrophenol in
highest biological loads were observed in alluvial alluvial pit soil) and the lowest (1.41 µ-mol-p-
soil of the abandoned pits, followed by the control nitrophenol in recent or active pit soil) was only
while the least were in the active mining pit soil 59.49% while that of alkaline phosphatase was
samples (Table 2). Nitrifying bacteria (2.7 x 103 – 55.46% (2.47 – 1.37). This shows that the
9 x 101 cfu/g) were the most adversely affected environmental factors did not have very
followed by the PSB (2.4 x 103 – 1.10 x102cfu/g). significant effect on the phosphatases compared
Cellulolytic bacteria had a range of 2.83 x 103 – to the other enzymes.
1.2 x 102 cfu/g. The least affected bacteria were Observations in the glucosidase activity also
the total heterotrophic group with a range of 6.7 x showed similar trends as other enzymes. The
106 – 4.3 x 104 cfu/g. lowest activity was in the soil from active mining
Analysis of pH and microbial counts showed pit (1.7 mg/g-16h-1) and the highest (6.7mg/g-6h-1)
that acidic pH favoured the proliferation of IOB in the tailing soil. Values for the control are
and SOB more than SRB while alkaline pH had shown on Table 2.
the opposite effects. Similarly there were
suppressive effects of the heavy metals (Pb and

1833
Nwaugo et al, 2009 Nig.J.Microbiol., 23(1);1830 - 1838

Table 1: Physicochemical parameters of the various alluvial deposit soil and active mine pit soil’

PARAMETER MTS 1 MTS 2 MTS 3 MTS 4 AMS 1 AMS2 Control


Soil
a a a b c c d
Clay % 13+01.00 13+02.00 14+02.00 15+02.00 6+0.3.00 4+0.06 09+1.00
Silt % 35+03.00a 34+02.00a 35+02.00a 37+03.02b 15+0.01c 18+1.01c 28+0.02d
Sand % 52+02.00a 53+03.00a 51+02.00a 48+02.00b 79+0.03c 78+0.02c 63+0.02d

Colour Dark Dark Dark Dark Brown Brown Brown


pH 7.14+02a 6.76+0.3b 7.24+02a 6.98+0.3b 5.6+0.2c 5.5+0.3c 6.5.2+0.2d
Temp oc 29.7+03a 29.8+02a 29.5+0.2a 29.4+0.2a 28.2+04b 28.4+0.3b 28.9+0.3b
a a a a c c d
PQ4 mg/g 5.97+0.11 5.64+0.3 5.82+0.10 6.01+0.13 2.42+0.3 2.24+0.2 4.91+0.11
a b b c d d e
SO4 mg/g 42.35+0.21 46.39+0.24 44.78+0.29 53.27+0.21 14.36+0.26 16.75+0.27 37.64+0.12
a a b b c c d
NO3 mg/g 4.36+0.11 4.24+0.17 4.74+0.14 4.82+0.13 0.82+0.18 0.91+0.16 2.87+0.12
TOC mg/g 1.02+0.2a 1.27+0.2b 1.30+0.3b 1.47+0.3b 0.32+0.4c O0.39+0.4c 0.92+0.2d
a b b a c c d
Moisture % 4.41+2.1 3.97+2.6 3.68+2.5 4.01+2.2 1.21+0.4 1.33+0.6 2.67+1.3
a a a b c c d
NH4 mg/g 0.41+0.1 0.45+0.1 0.47+0.1 0.64+0.1 0.12+0.03 0.11+0.6 0.29+0.1
a b c d a a
Cd mg/g 0.06+0.1 0.05+0.1 0.03+0.01 0.04 +0.1 0.06+0 0.06+0.2 0.01+.00d
Cr mg/g 0.04+0.0a 0.04+.00a 0.02+0.1b 0.03+00b 0.04+0.01a 0.04+0.00a 0.01+ 00c
a a a a b a c
Pb mg/g 100.81+3.1 104.62+5.1 06.46+3.1 102.12+3.1 191.49+5.1 186.42+32 40.41+22
a a a a b b c
Zn mg/g 42.41+1.3 39.21+1.6 38.51+2.0 40.11+1.9 109.41+3.7 112.64+40 26.79+2.1
a a a a b b
Fe mg/g 21.36+1.3 26.71+1.6 22.31+2.0 23.16+2.1 36.7+3.6 34.39+4.1 18.66+1.3c
MTS = Mine tailing soil AMS =Active mine soil
Values followed by the same alphabets are not significantly different but those followed by different alphabets
are significantly different

Table 2: Bacterial diversity in bioloads (cfu/g) of the various soil samples from abandoned alluvial and active
mine soils examined.

Parameter MTS 1 MTS 2 MTS 3 MTS 4 AMS 1 AMS 2 Control


Soil
NB 2.7X103 2.4x102 2.1X102 2.5X103 0.4X101 0.6X101 1.2X103
4 4 4 4 2 2 4
CE 2.5 x10 2.6+10 2.6 X10 2.9 X10 1.2 X10 1.4 X10 1.2 X10
3
PSB 2.1X10 2.0+103 2.4 X102 2.2 X103 1.4 X102 1.2 X102 2.8 X102
SRB 3.9X102 4.6X102 4.1 X102 4.5 X102 1.6 X102 1.6 X102 2.2 X102
3 2 3 3 4 4 2
IOB 6.7X10 6.1X10 6.4 X10 6.8 X10 2.4 X10 2.4 X10 3.1 X10
3 3 3 2 3 3 3
SOB 1.7X10 1.2X10 1.0 X10 1.1 X10 1.9 X10 1.9 X10 1.1 X10
THB 6.6X107 6.3X107 6.1 X102 6.7 X107 4.3 X104 4.7 X104 4.4 X106

*Values reported are mean values of three times estimation results


NB = Nitrifying bacteria, CB = Coliform bacteria, PSB = Phophate solubilization bacteria
,SRB = Sulphur reducing bacteria, SOB = Sulphur oxidizing bacteria, IOB = Iron oxidizing bacteria
THB = Total heterotrophic bacteria

1834
Nwaugo et al, 2009 Nig.J.Microbiol., 23(1);1830 - 1838

Table 3: Enzymatic activities in the various soil samples examined

Enzyme MTS 1 MTS 2 MTS 3 MTS 4 AMS 1 AMS 2 Control soil


Dehydrogenase 8.21+0.6a 7.91+0.4a 7.82+0.4a 8.10+0.3a 0.82+0.8b 0.91+0.8b 5.3+0.6 c
(mg/g-gh-1)

Urease 4.25+0.4a 4.42+0.3a 4.52+0.3a 4.36+0.3a 1.03+0.1b 1.10+0.1b 2.77+0.2c


(mg/g-1 3h-1)

Acid phosphatase 2.12+0.5a 2.41+0.4a 2.37+0.4 a 2.41+0.4a 1.41+0.1b 1.46+0.1b 1.94+0.2c


umol-p-nitrophenol

Alkaline 2.47+0.4a 2.44+0.4a 2.49+0.4a 2.46+0.4a 1.42+0.02b 1.38+0.03b 1.87+0.2c


phosphatase
u-mol-p-nitrophenol

Glucosidase mg/g- 6.7+0.4a 6.4+0.4a 6.4+0.4a 6.6+0. 4a 1.7+0.3 b 1.0+0.3b 3.2+0.1c


6h-1
Values followed by the same alphabets are not significantly different
Values followed by different alphabets are significantly different

Baath et al., (2005), and Schoenhaltz et


Discussions and conclusions al., (2000) who had earlier reported that
The washed down soil in the washing down of particles into a pit,
abandoned mine pits have been known to brings NO3, PO4, SO4 and organic carbon
be very complex and different from the into such pit. Again, excavation activities
surrounding soil (Weillinga et al, 1999, in mines, bring up sand particles to the
Nwaugo et al, 2007b). This was evident surface. These could therefore account
in this study. Physicochemical parameters for the poor soil quality of the active mine
determined in this study, showed pit soil and the opposite for the alluvial
significant differences in values according soil of the abandoned mine pits as
to the soil type analyzed. PO4, SO4, NO3, observed in this study.
TOC and moisture content were Further observations indicated that
significantly more in the alluvial soil in soil moisture contents were higher in the
the abandoned mine pits. Statistical abandoned mine alluvial soil than other
differences were equally evident in soil soil samples. This observation could be
particle sizes investigated, as silt and clay attributed to high silt and clay content of
particles were more available in the the alluvial soil which could retain more
alluvial soil while the active pit soil had water than the sandy soil. The pH
mainly sandy particles. This might have showed neutral values in the abandoned
resulted from the action of rain water run- pits following accumulation of materials
off which could carry smaller particles from various sources that could act as
of soil, and clay with less sand into the buffering materials thereby reducing the
abandoned pits. These particles had acidity. The active mine soil samples
higher PO4, SO4, NO3 and TOC content were still fresh and acidic due to the mine
than the sandy soil of the active mining effluent water. Several researchers have
pit where excavation was still on. reported acidic pH in active mines of
Nwaugo et al., (2007b) had reported a heavy metals (Weillinga et al, 1999,
similar observation. These observations Pascul et al, 2000).
equally agree with Cloasson et al., (2005),

1835
Nwaugo et al, 2009 Nig.J.Microbiol., 23(1);1830 - 1838

The heavy metals concentration bacteria. Much of the materials washed


showed a remarkable trend as only Pb and into the abandoned mine were plants and
Zn had concentrations above acceptable other organic materials which contained
limits following the standards of CEC high cellulose and phosphate. Thes served
as substrates for the cellulolytic and
directive, (CEC Directive, 1986, Van-Rensburg phosphate solubilizing bacteria. Kahn, and
et al, 1998). Values for Cu, Cd, and Fe were Scullion (2000) had a similar observation.
within acceptable limits, though Fe had higher While IOB and SOB were more
values in the active mining pits with its reddish prevalent in the acidic soil of the active
brown colour. The high Pb and Zn values could mines, SRB were higher in the more
be attributed to water from the mining pits. neutral abandoned mine alluvial soil.
These are the metals mined in the area, so parts This observation agrees with Cloassen et
of the ore could dissolve in the available soil al., (2005), Fortin et al., (1995) and
water. Brenar et al., (1995), and Fortin et al., Weillinga et al., (1999). This observation
(1995) had reported that the concentration of tends to agree that microbial diversity is
any particular heavy metal in soil is a reflection complex but depends on the interactions
of the metal mined in that area, which agrees of several environmental factors.
well with this study. The observations of more microbial
Observations in the microbial loads in the alluvial soil of the abandoned
diversity and structure showed a higher pits indicated the high availability of
microbial prevalence in the alluvial soil of utilizable substrates and condusive
the abandoned pits. This could be environmental factors. Konopka et al.,
attributed to its rich microbial nutrients (1998), and Prescott et al., (2003) have
availability and complexity. The stated that micro-organisms proliferate in
availability of SO4, PO4, NO3 and any habitat with enough nutrients and
metabolizable organic matter in the soil conducive environment. This could be the
indicated that nutrients were available to case in the abandoned mine alluvial soil
support the proliferation of with enough microbial nutrients (NO3,
microorganisms. However, the only PO4, SO4 and TOC) and good
difference was the concentrations coupled environmental conditions (more neutral
with the other accompanying pH, temperature and less heavy metal
environmental factors. concentrations).
The most sensitive bacterial group Dehydrogenase, produced by all
was the nitrifying bacteria while the least forms of microorganisms (Lee et al,
was the total heterotrophic bacteria. The 2002) was the most adversely affected
THB group is a very complex group enzyme. This correlated positively with
comprising of all forms of viable bacterial the microbial loads. Active mine pit soil
species in the soil. It is not specialized, had the least microbial loads except in the
hence is the sum total of all available case of IOB and SOB bacteria.
viable bacteria. The nitrifying bacteria are Summation of the microbial loads showed
very sensitive to environmental changes, that the alluvial soil of the abandoned pits
especially heavy metals and oxygen had higher loads than the control and the
tension. Mining is known to greatly alter active mine pit in that order. This then
these factors (Lee et al, 2002, Pascul et al, follows that the enzymatic activities are
1996) . The conditions in the active pit dependent on the producing
were neutralized in the mine alluvial soil microorganisms i.e. low microbial loads
hence the increase in microbial load. The will result in low enzymatic activities and
same trend was observed in the high load result in higher activities. The
cellulolytic and phosphate solubilizing high cellulose/carbohydrate components

1836
Nwaugo et al., 2009 Nig.J.Microbiol., 23(1);1830 - 1838

in the abandoned mine pit alluvial soil Microbiology. Tropical Health


provided substrate for the glucosidase [
Technology, ELBS London.
while the protein served as substrate for Cloassen, S., Riedel, K.J., Van Rensburg, C.,
urease. The phosphorus-containing Morgenthal, T.C.P. and J. Jansen, Vam
compounds, which were high in the Rensburg (2005) Soil Microbial
abandoned mine alluvial soil served as Propeties in Coal Mine Tailings under
substrates for the phosphatases. This then rehabilitation. Appl.
supported the high enzymatic activities in Eco. Environ. Research 4 (1):75-83.
such soil over the other soil types with Dick, R.P, Breakwell, D.P, and Turco, R.F.
less utilizable materials (substrates). (1996) Soil enzymes and biodiversity
Generally enzyme activities values measurements as integrative
obtained in this study fall within those microbiological indicators. In: Doran J.W.
reported by Li et al., (2005), Kuppeman ad Jones,(Eds) Methods for assessing
and Carreiro (1997) and Nwaugo et al., soil quality. SSSA special Publication 49.
(2007ab). Soil Science Societ of America, Modison
The results showed the alluvial soil W.I. 247-281.
of the abandoned mine pits as being more Eivazi, F. and Tabatabai, M.A. (1988).
complex in microbial diversity and Glucosidases and galactosidass in soil.
nutrients. This also indicated more Soil Biol Biochem. 34; 601-606
complex biogeochemical transformations Fortin, D.B., Davis, G. Southham and T.J.
in such soil with its complex array of Beveridge (1995) Biogeochemica
microorganisms and enzymes. phenomena induced by bacteria within
References sulfidic mine Tailings. J. Ind. Micorbiol.
Aon, M and Colaroneri, A.C. (2001) 14:178-185.
Temporal and spatial evolution of Harrison, A.P. (1984) The acidophilic thiobocilli
enzymatic activities and physicochemical and other acidophilic bacterial that share
properties in an agricultural soil; Appl. their habitat. Ann: Rev. Microbial.
Soil. Eco. 18:255-270. 38:265-292.
Baath, E. Diaz-Ravina, M, Bakken L.R. Kahn, M and Scullion J. (2000) Effects of soil
(2005) Microbial Biomass, community on microbial responses to metal
structure and metal tolerance of a contamination. Environ Poll. 110:115-125
naturally Pb – enriched forest soil. Kandelar, E. and Gerber, H. (1988) Short term
Microbial Eco. 50:496 – 505 assay of urease activity using colorimetric
Brener,S.G.;E.W.Smart,andMoore,J N (1995) determination of ammonium Bio. Fertil
Metal behaviour during surface ground Soils 6:68-72.
water interaction. Silver Bow Creek, Konopka,A, Oliveira, L and Turco, R F (1998)
Montanna Environ. Sc. Technol 29:1789- The use of carbon substrate utilization
1795. patterns in environment tal and ecological
CEC, Directive (1986) Commission of the Microbiology. Microbial Ecol. 35:103-
European Communities Council Directive 115
on the protection of the environment and Kuperman, R.G. and Cariciro, M.M. (1997).
in particular of soil, when sewage sludge Soil heavy metal concentrations,
is used in Agricultural Office. J. Europ. microbial biomass and enzymes activities
Comm. L1816. in a contaminated grassland ecosystem.
Chessbrough, M. (2003) Laboratory Manual Soil Biol. Biochem 29:179-190.
for Tropical Countries. Volume II Lee, I., Kim,K.,Chang, Y., Baa, B., Kini, H H
and Bachi, K. (2002) Heavy metal
Nig.J.Microbiol., 23(1);1795-1804

1837
Nwaugo et al. 2009 Nig.J.Microbiol., 23(1);1830 - 1838

concentrations and enzyme activities in Hill, Boston


soil from a contaminated Korean shooting Schoenhalts, S.H Van Micgroet, H. and Burger,
range. J Biosen. Biomin. 94(5);406-411 J.A. (2000) A review of chemical and
physical properties as indicators of forest
Li, H., Zhang, Y, Zhang, C.G. and Chen G.X soil quality, challenges and opportunity –
(2005). Effects of petroleum containing Forest. Eco. Mgt. 138:335-356.
waste water irrigation on bacterial Tabatabai, M.A. (1997). Soil Enzymes: In Page
diversities and enzymatic activities in a L. Millier, R.A. and Kenney, D.R. (eds).
paddy soil irrigation area. J. environ. Methods of Soil Analysis Part 2:
Qual. 34:1073-1080. Chemical and microbiological properties:
Nwaugo, V.O. Onyeagba, R.A. and Soil Sciences of America, Madison, N.Y.
Nwachukwu (2006). Bacteriological UNEP (2004) United Nations Environment
quality of cercariae Programme Analytical methods for
(Schistosoma haematobium) infested environmental water quality. Global
abounded quarry pits water. J. Sc. Engr. Environmental Monitoring System with
Tech. 13(2):6697-6706. International Atomic Energy Agency
Nwaugo, V.O., Obiekezie, S.O and Etok, C.A. Canada.
(2007). Post operational effects of heavy US Patent (2003) Patent storms 6638730.
metal mining on soil quality in Ishiagu, composition for qualitative screaming of
Ebonyi State. Int. J. Biotechnol All. Sci. phosphate
2(3) 24:242-351 solubilizing micro-organisms and a
Nwaugo, V.O., Onyeagba, R.A., Azu, N. and qualitative method for screening
Nworie, O. (2007a). Petroleum produced microorganism.
(formation) water induced changes in Issued on October, 28, 2003.
bacterial quality and soil enzymatic Van Rensburg, L. De Sousa, Correia, R.I.
activities in a Borysen, J. Ginster, M. (1998)
farmland in Egbema, Southern Nigeria. Revegetation on a
Estud. Biol. 29(66) 89-97. coal fine ash disposal site in South Africa.
Pascual, J.A. Hernandiz, C. Garcia, and J. Environ. Qual. 27:1479-1486.
Ayoso M. (1996). Enzymes activities in Wiellinga, B., Lucy, J.K., Moore, J.N.,
arid soil – amended with urban organic Seastone,O.F.and,Gamen,J.E.(1999)Micr
wastes. Laboratory experiments Business obiological and geochemical
Technol. 64:131-138. characterization of alluvially deposited
Prescott, L.M., Harley, S P., and Klein, D sulfidic mine tailings. Appl. Environ.
A.(2005) Microbiology 6th edition. WCB Microbiol, 65:1548-1555
McGraw

1838

Potrebbero piacerti anche