Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
UNDER ARIZONA RULE OF THE SUPREME COURT 111(c), THIS DECISION IS NOT PRECEDENTIAL
AND MAY BE CITED ONLY AS AUTHORIZED BY RULE.
IN THE
ARIZONA COURT OF APPEALS
DIVISION ONE
v.
AFFIRMED
COUNSEL
MEMORANDUM DECISION
T H O M P S O N, Judge:
4 In April 2014, DCS visited the home. They found the children
were dirty and were wearing dirty clothes. DCS also confirmed the home
condition, as reported, and mother admitted to having recentlyin the past
several daysused both methamphetamine and marijuana. The DCS
investigator discovered that A.L., nearly six years old at the time, had not
been enrolled in school and J.L. had an untreated medical need for his right
eye.
2
CHASTITY S. v. DCS, et al.
Decision of the Court
DISCUSSION
3
CHASTITY S. v. DCS, et al.
Decision of the Court
4
CHASTITY S. v. DCS, et al.
Decision of the Court
2 The record does not support mothers position that she could not
complete [individual therapy] because she had difficulty getting
transportation to the sessions. The record shows that DCS offered her
transportation and bus passes to assist her in her case plan services.
5
CHASTITY S. v. DCS, et al.
Decision of the Court
II. Sufficient evidence in the record supports the courts finding that
severance was in the childrens best interests.
3 See Maricopa Cty. Juv. Action No. JS-501904, 180 Ariz. 348, 352, 884
P.2d 234, 238 (App. 1994) ([DCS] need not show that it has a specific
adoption plan before terminating a parents rights; [DCS] must show that
the children are adoptable.).
6
CHASTITY S. v. DCS, et al.
Decision of the Court
CONCLUSION